that's interesting. Is it open source? If so, can you point us at it? Maybe
someone should compare it to the version I wrote 20 years ago :)
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016, Mojmír Vinkler wrote:
> Thanks!
> Just FYI - we applied newer version of NLME from Pierrick Coupé before
> running freesurfer and it greatly improved segmentation results.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:47 PM Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> Hi Mojmir
>
> we don't apply mri_nlfilter by default so there is no need to
> turn it
> off. You are welcome to try it out. It implement some nonlinear
> filters
> including what is now called nonlocal means as described in this
> paper:
>
>
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/abstractAuthors.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=745
> 732
>
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On
> Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Mojmír Vinkler wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering if it's possible to replace or turn off your
> denoising
> > algorithm `mri_nlfilter`. We'd like to try different denoising
> filters and
> > compare how they influence segmentation performance. Right now
> we're
> > applying filter before running recon-all, but I fear that
> applying your
> > filter on already filtered image might degrade our analysis.
> >
> > I couldn't find any mention of mri_nlfilter besides this one
> on mailinglisthttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2011-October/020
> 762.
> > html. I hope I didn't miss something anything.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Mojmir
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
> to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
> and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> Compliance HelpLine at
>
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
> to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>