I am attaching another screenshot to show that the control points unfortunately do not solve the problem. See occipital lobe.It is primate data. I am having trouble with this particular data set only; the other ones are at the same resolution and worked fine.Hi Bruce,sorry, I meant to say that data is conformed.
Caspar2013/10/3 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Hi Caspar,
that's probably part of the problem. Is this human data? If you actually run it at 1mm (conforming it) does it work better?
Bruce
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
It is originally 0.5x0.5x0.5 mm but we are pretending it's 1x1x1 mm.
Caspar
2013/10/3 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
what resolution?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
This was a fairly regular MPRAGE, unfortunately not
very well optimized for
contrast. However, the main issue seems to be that
the data were acquired
with a surface coil here. That made some of the
brain extremely bright
(close to the coil) and some of the brain pretty
dark (far away from the
coil). In the screenshot that I sent you, there is
some gray matter that has
values between 95-100, which is well captured by the
pial surface, while the
grey matter in the more medial areas has values
between 70 and 80. The
transition where the pial surface starts to fail is
when the gray matter
values drop from above 90 to below 90.
Caspar
2013/10/3 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
hmmmm. Can you tell us more about the
acquisition?
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
wrote:
the white matter is mostly between 100
and 110 in
these regions. at least in
the center of the wm, the voxels are
almost all 110.
caspar
2013/10/3 Bruce Fischl
<fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
is the WM in those regions already
close to
110? No, there is no
way to normalize GM intensity (it
has too much
biological
variability over the brain)
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar M.
Schwiedrzik
wrote:
Thanks, Bruce. The problem is
fairly
extensive. There is
no way to do
normalize grey matter intensity
(the white
surface looks
pretty good)?Caspar
On Thursday, October 3, 2013,
Bruce Fischl
wrote:
Hi Caspar
try putting control points
in the white
matter where
the pial
surface doesn't get out far
enough.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013, Caspar
M.
Schwiedrzik wrote:
Hi Freesurfer Experts,
I am working on a
fairly noisy and
inhomogeneous
MPRAGE T1 and I am
having
trouble getting the
pial surface
to go all the
way
through the grey
matter.
Please see screenshot
attached.
These data
were
acquired with a
surface coil
and the grey matter
varies a lot
in intensity.
Interestingly, the
pial
surface growing
process fails
where the grey
matter
is fairly dark. I have
tried several rounds
of
normalizing using the
N3
tool but that didn't
change
anything.
Thanks for any advice
on this,
Caspar
The information in this
e-mail is
intended only for
the person
to whom it is
addressed. If you believe
this e-mail
was sent to
you in error
and the e-mail
contains patient
information, please
contact the
Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline .
If the
e-mail was sent
to you in error
but does not contain patient
information, please
contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.