Hi Bruce and Michael,
That would be very nice. Do I just email you the hi-res whole-brain mprages, or is their another way to get the images to you?
On the other hand, I'm a fair hand at scripting. I'd be willing to experiment with any scripts that you might provide.
Last, and on an unrelated note. Is that programming position at Freesurfer still open? I know someone looking for an interesting and challenging position like that.
Best,
Joshua
Yes, I have a modified script working. For the white surface, the
essentials are the same as Bruce's script but it has some additional stuff
(e.g register T2w to T1w), and I call it in the middle of the recon-all
rather than at the end. For the pial surface, I have done some more
complicated stuff, which I'd love to talk to Bruce about some more some
time. :)
Peace,
Matt.
-----Original Message-----
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:29 AM
To: Michael Waskom
Cc: FreeSurfer
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future
you need to call mris_make_surfaces directly. It's a bit complicated as you
need to intensity normalize and register the hires volume to the surfaces
first. I have an example script if anyone is interested, but no one has
used it yet but me I don't think (unless Matt Glasser has gotten his
version working, which on second thought he probably has)
On Mon, 14
May 2012, Michael Waskom wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> Is there a flag for this on recon-all? Or do you need to use
> mri_make_surfaces directly?
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> Hi Joshua
>
> yes, we already have upgraded mris_make_surfaces to take higher
> res data
> and refine the surfaces with it. Haven't tried it on the aseg
> yet, but if
> you upload a sample dataset I could see how hard it is.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Mon, 14 May 2012,
> Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> > Dear Freesurfers,
> >
> > Over the last years, MR imaging technology hasimproved such
> that sub 1-mm
> > isotropic scans can be obtained with good signal to noise
> characteristics.
> > For example, our lab uses 0.7mm isotropic structural MR
> images. I understand
> > that the Freesurfer pipeline will up-sample these to 1mm
> isotropic, but it
> > seems a shame that so much information is left unused which
> could be used to
> > improve the accuracy of sub-cortical and cortical
> segmentation. My question
> > is whether there are any plans at Freesurfer to change the
> reference
> > standard resolution from 1mm isotropic, or provide another
> solution that can
> > help researchers make the most of your technology.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> >
> > Joshua
> > -
> > Joshua
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
> it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
> in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
> and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer