Thanks for reply. But adding subfield volumes together leads to too high number compared to overall hippocampus volume. Like 9500 mm3 compared to 2.1 mm3.

Petr

---------- Původní zpráva ----------
Od: Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Komu: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Datum: 15. 4. 2014 14:35:13
Předmět: Re: [Freesurfer] FS volume discrepancies

>From Eugenio:
------------------------
Dear Petr,
at this point, the hippocampal subfield module is - to some extent -
independent from the whole hippocampal segmentation. The values you will
obtain from adding the subfield volumes together will be around 15% lower
than the volumes from aseg.stat, but they will still be very highly
correlated.
Kind regards,
------------------------

On
Tue,
15 Apr 2014, zach.petr@post.cz wrote:

>
> I have several issues concerning automated volumes calculation. When you
> look at the aseg.stat for hippocampal volume (in mm3) it gives different
> value compared to hippocampal subfields volume calculation (which comes in
> voxels but there is stated that 1 voxel is 0.5mm3). How is it possible? I
> presume that anatomical definition and subfield incorporation is the same.
>
> Next - if you look at the whole hippocampal formation volume in hippocampal
> subfield calculations it is way lower compared to the summation of the
> CA1-CA4 + dentate gyrus = hippocampal formation. What could be explanation
> of this?
>
> Petr
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.