Hi again,
in the paper, we used FreeSurfer 5.3 the process the data (recon-all), and then run the hippocampal module on top of that. So, with a bit of trouble, you can reproduce the results..
However, the 6.0 beta was taken down, so reproducing the results of the recon-all stream would be hard, and since such results affect the hippocampal module, reproducing the subfield segmentation would in turn also be hard.
Does this make sense?
Cheers,
/E
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Postdoctoral researcher BCBL
www.jeiglesias.com
www.bcbl.eu
Legal disclaimer/Aviso legal/Lege-oharra: www.bcbl.eu/legal-disclaimer
From: "Francis Tyson Thomas" <francistthomas@email.arizona.edu>
To: "Freesurfer support list" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 1:04:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer v6 beta
Hi Eugenio,
I understood this part that you mentioned but I didn't understand how is is affected and what would be its consequences? Because I am referring to your preprint paper that makes use of v6, so will the results/validity of that paper also get affected by these differences. Because in my work the accuracy of the segmentation outputs are critical both for analysis and speeding it up.
Thanks,
Tyson
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.