External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Bruce,


I sent you the whole directory if one subject un which we had some problems extending the pial surface. Se would like extend the pial surface without affect the wm boundary. 

Did you have a chance to review It?


Thanks in advance,


Cheers,



El vie., 4 may. 2018 1:02, Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández <miguelrivasfdez@gmail.com> escribió:
Hi Bruce,


I tried to upload the whole subject dir in the ftp site but i didn´t works. I send you the file in 7zip format trough a google drive link . I would know how can i extend the pial surface without affect the wm boundaries because the pial surface segmentation in some subjects (as this that i send to you) was incorrect.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=11xcWuDlWzGeLLV4MvW-bJK3-rrlsIA8Q



Thaks in advance


Cheers,

2018-05-01 16:26 GMT+02:00 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
why don't you tar and gzip the whole subject dir and upload it to our ftp site and we will take a look
cheers
Bruce

On Tue, 1 May 2018, Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández wrote:


        External Email - Use Caution        


Hi Bruce,


The problem is that the reconstruction of the pial surface is incorrect. I tried to put control
points on some voxels but did a wrong reconstruction because in this region there is no voxel with
an intensity between 95-110. How can I improve the reconstruction of the pial surface (in this case
extend) without modifying the boundaries of wm? . Sorry, I read the answer you gave to Saum but I
could not understand very well how to modify the statistics that FreeSurfer does in the
mri_make_surfaces.



Hi Saum

it is, but you need to figure out why it isn't getting out far enough. The easiest way is to
override the intensity statistics that are computed automatically in mris_make_surfaces. You can see
them if you look in your recon-all.log. For example if the lowest value gm is allowed to be at the
pial surface is too high, then it will settle too far in 


Thanks,


Cheers,

 

2018-04-29 17:33 GMT+02:00 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
      that looks like a big temporal lobe bias field to me. Is the WM in the temporal lobes
      significantly darker than 110? I can't tell if some of the stuff in e.g. the left medial
      temporal lobe is WM or GM. Try putting some control points in regions where the
      intensity is in say [95, 110) and see if that helps

      cheers
      Bruce


      On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández wrote:


                    External Email - Use Caution        

            Hi guys,


            I have the same problem as Saum, I executed the recon-all in several
            subjects and I did not obtain a
            completely correct segmentation of the pial surface. To solve this error
            could I use the control
            points? When I use the control points, will I also be able to correct the
            white matter segmentation?

            I send you a image if you want
            to check it.

            Thank you very much!


            Cheers,



            [IMAGE]

             

            2018-04-27 21:28 GMT+02:00 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
                  Hi Saum

                  it is, but you need to figure out why it isn't getting out far enough.
            The easiest way
                  is to override the intensity statistics that are computed
            automatically in
                  mris_make_surfaces. You can see them if you look in your
            recon-all.log. For example if
                  the lowest value gm is allowed to be at the pial surface is too high,
            then it will
                  settle too far in

                  cheers
                  Bruce


                  On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Saum Naderi wrote:


                                External Email - Use Caution        

                        Hi guys,

                        I'm having some trouble extending the pial surface of my bm
            volume. I am
                        aware that the general
                        procedure for extending the pial is to extend the wm first and
            the pial will
                        follow. However, is it
                        possible to extend the pial surface without affecting the wm
            boundary?

                        Thanks,

                        Saum



            _______________________________________________
            Freesurfer mailing list
            Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
            https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


            The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
            addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
            e-mail
            contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
            HelpLine at
            http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
            error
            but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
            properly
            dispose of the e-mail.




            --
            Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
Miguel Ángel Rivas Fernández