Hi all,

I have a similar question: My T2 scans are similar to Nicola's - approximately .86 x .86 x 4.5mm. However, about 60/168 subjects don't have T2 scans. Would you recommend including the T2's for the subjects who have them, or excluding the T2 scans altogether?

Thank you in advance for your help!


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Nicola

the T2 might in 5.2, but it is pretty thick slices so might hurt more
than it helps. Not sure, but you can try it out

cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Nicola
Toschi wrote:

> Hello List,
>
> on out 3T scanner, in addition to MPRAGE images (1 mm^3), we usually
> acquire T2 and PD images - however they are at 1x1x5 mm resolution.
>
> Would you recommend passing these (T2+PD) to the recon-all stream anyway
> - would they add value/accuracy to the segmentation/parcellation (or
> would they possibly decrease accuracy)?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Nicola
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
Ashley A. Shurick
Graduate Student, Psychology
Stanford University