Dear Bruce,

that sounds good. How about the following three which I think may have some specific problems in which as mentioned in the file name, especially in the cerebellum one, I think there are a lot of slices similar to this one: the gray matter seems always cover a little bit part of the adjacent cerebellum. So do you think whether they have problems or not?

Thanks,

Kaiming

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Hi Kaiming

those look pretty good. It's impossible to tell for sure from a single slice.

Bruce

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Kaiming Yin wrote:

Dear guys,

I have a simple question in the manual edits parts.

I am using freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0 with Ubuntu 13.10, for a trial on a 3T adult data, and I attached the data 2 screenshot common
examples here, personally I am not sure if the wm boundary seems good or not. So I hope if you can help have a look and see if this data has any place need edits.
And also usually, for a 3T data like this, how many edits will be approximately needed? I mean will it usually cost several corrections enough? Or 10s? 30s? or
even more? (sorry for the oversize of last email attachment)

Great thanks,
Kaiming

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.