Dear Doug,
Thanks. According to your suggestions, I would extract fmri time course from an individual paracellation with subcortical regions (e.g. caudate, thalamus...). Would you like to help me to make sure whether the following commands are correct. Here the filtered_fun_data.nii.gz did not be smoothed. Thanks a lot.
reg-feat2anat --feat SUBID/bold.feat --subject SUBID
aseg2feat --feat SUBID/bold.feat --aseg aparcs+aseg
mri_segstats --seg SUBID/bold.feat/reg/
mapping the time courses to the average subject does not solve this problem, it just hides it. I'm not sure why this would be of a concern anyway. There might be a tiny difference in the expected variance for each subject, but, unless the region is very small, the differences won't amount for much.
doug
liang wang wrote:
Dear Doug,2010/7/18 Doug Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Thanks for your comments. However, I am worried about the different number of voxels within each parcellation between subjects, if extracting fmri time course from individual parcellation result.
Also, I am using the following combined commands to carry out the steps. Do you think it's correct?
reg-feat2anat --feat SUBID/bold.feat --subject SUBID
aseg2feat --feat SUBID/bold.feat --aseg aparcs+aseg
mri_segstats --seg SUBID/bold.feat/reg/freesurfer/aparc.a2009s+aseg.nii.gz --in filtered_fun_data.nii.gz -avgwf file.dat
Thanks,
Liang
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting> <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
definitely use the individuals. Use mri_vol2surf to convert the motion
corrected (and otherwise unsmoothed) fmri time courses to the
surface. Then use mri_segstats with the --avgwf and --annot options
to compute the mean time course over the parcellations.
doug
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, liang wang wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know one of studies which uses the parcellations
(aparc or
aparc.a2009s) Freesurfer provides to extract fMRI time course
from each
subject's fMRI data. Reading the instructions in Freesurfer
Wiki, I know how
to do that. However, I am not sure whether I should use the
parcellations
from the average output (obtained from make_average_subject),
or the
parcellations based on each subject. I would next compute
functional
connectivity between these regions. I am appreciated for any
suggestions.
Liang
-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR CenterEmail: wanglbit@gmail.com <mailto:wanglbit@gmail.com>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners
Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the
sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
--
Liang Wang, PhD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Woodward Lab
Department of Psychiatry
University of British Columbia
BC Mental Health & Addiction Services
938 West 28th Avenue
Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4
Telephone: 1-604-875-2000 (ext. 4735)
Fax: 1-604-875-3871
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html