Thu Jul 13 06:05:20 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106 /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/recon-all -all -hires -openmp 4 -s nmr01106 -FLAIRpial -expert expert.opts subjid nmr01106 setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer/dev Actual FREESURFER_HOME /autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/dev build-stamp.txt: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170711-a80a795 Linux compute-0-37 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux cputime unlimited filesize unlimited datasize unlimited stacksize 10240 kbytes coredumpsize 0 kbytes memoryuse unlimited vmemoryuse 29360128 kbytes descriptors 32768 memorylocked unlimited maxproc 128314 total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 32877136 14141464 18735672 168 164912 3907436 -/+ buffers/cache: 10069116 22808020 Swap: 67108860 41068 67067792 pbsjob 14402458.launchpad.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu ######################################## program versions used $Id: recon-all,v 1.601 2017/02/08 21:17:33 greve Exp $ $Id: mri_motion_correct.fsl,v 1.15 2016/02/16 17:17:20 zkaufman Exp $ mri_convert.bin -all-info ProgramName: mri_convert.bin ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:20-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 FLIRT version 6.0 $Id: talairach_avi,v 1.13 2015/12/23 04:25:17 greve Exp $ mri_convert.bin --version dev build (use --all-info flag for full version info) ProgramName: tkregister2_cmdl ProgramArguments: --all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:20-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: tkregister2.c,v 1.133 2016/08/02 21:17:11 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 Program nu_correct, built from: Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@minerva (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) on 2010-02-20 at 17:32:37 ProgramName: mri_make_uchar ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:21-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_make_uchar.c,v 1.4 2011/03/02 00:04:14 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:21-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_normalize.c,v 1.92 2017/01/27 22:31:34 ah221 Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_watershed ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:22-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_watershed.cpp,v 1.103 2016/06/17 18:00:49 zkaufman Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_gcut ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:22-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_gcut.cpp,v 1.14 2011/03/02 00:04:16 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_segment ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:22-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_segment.c,v 1.44 2016/10/22 17:29:37 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_label2label.bin ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:22-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_label2label.c,v 1.50 2016/12/10 22:57:43 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_em_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:22-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_em_register.c,v 1.106 2016/10/22 17:31:12 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_ca_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:22-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_ca_normalize.c,v 1.69 2016/10/22 17:30:57 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_ca_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:23-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_ca_register.c,v 1.99 2016/10/22 17:31:24 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_ca_label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:23-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_ca_label.c,v 1.115 2016/10/22 17:31:36 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_pretess ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:23-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_pretess.c,v 1.22 2013/08/30 18:12:25 mreuter Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_fill ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:23-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_fill.c,v 1.119 2011/10/25 14:09:58 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_tessellate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:24-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.39 2016/07/20 21:05:04 zkaufman Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_concatenate_lta.bin ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:24-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_concatenate_lta.c,v 1.16 2015/11/21 00:06:20 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_normalize_tp2 ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:24-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_normalize_tp2.c,v 1.8 2011/03/02 00:04:23 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_smooth ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:24-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_smooth.c,v 1.30 2014/01/21 18:48:21 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_inflate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:24-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_inflate.c,v 1.45 2016/01/20 23:42:15 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_curvature ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:25-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_curvature.c,v 1.31 2011/03/02 00:04:30 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_sphere ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:25-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.62 2017/02/07 19:04:37 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_fix_topology ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:25-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.51 2016/10/27 19:43:58 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_topo_fixer ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:26-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_topo_fixer.cpp,v 1.29 2011/03/02 00:04:34 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_ca_label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:26-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_ca_label.c,v 1.37 2014/02/04 17:46:42 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_euler_number ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:26-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_euler_number.c,v 1.10 2013/01/14 22:39:14 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_make_surfaces ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:26-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.172 2017/02/16 19:42:36 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:26-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_register.c,v 1.64 2017/02/07 19:04:44 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_volmask ProgramArguments: --all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:26-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_volmask.cpp,v 1.28 2016/11/18 19:19:29 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_anatomical_stats ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_anatomical_stats.c,v 1.79 2016/03/14 15:15:34 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mrisp_paint ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mrisp_paint.c,v 1.12 2016/03/22 14:47:57 fischl Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_curvature_stats ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_curvature_stats.c,v 1.65 2015/06/04 20:50:51 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mris_calc ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mris_calc.c,v 1.55 2016/09/27 18:50:16 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 $Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.77 2016/01/20 23:36:17 greve Exp $ ProgramName: mri_robust_register.bin ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.77 2016/01/20 23:36:17 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 $Id: mri_robust_template.cpp,v 1.54 2016/05/05 21:17:08 mreuter Exp $ ProgramName: mri_robust_template ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_robust_template.cpp,v 1.54 2016/05/05 21:17:08 mreuter Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_and ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_and.c,v 1.4 2011/03/02 00:04:13 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_or ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:27-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_or.c,v 1.5 2013/03/20 15:03:29 lzollei Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_fuse_segmentations ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:28-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_fuse_segmentations.c,v 1.8 2011/03/02 00:04:15 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_segstats ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:28-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.122 2017/01/23 18:23:14 greve Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ProgramName: mri_relabel_hypointensities ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: $ TimeStamp: 2017/07/13-10:05:28-GMT BuildTimeStamp: Jul 11 2017 03:02:24 CVS: $Id: mri_relabel_hypointensities.c,v 1.13 2015/05/15 18:44:10 nicks Exp $ User: tgholipo Machine: compute-0-37 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 40400 ####################################### GCADIR /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average GCA RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca GCASkull RB_all_withskull_2016-05-10.vc700.gca AvgCurvTif folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif GCSDIR /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average GCS DKaparc.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.gcs ####################################### #-------------------------------------------- #@# MotionCor Thu Jul 13 06:05:28 EDT 2017 Found 1 runs /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/001.mgz Checking for (invalid) multi-frame inputs... Only one run found so motion correction will not be performed. I'll copy the run to rawavg and continue. cp /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/001.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/rawavg.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106 mri_convert /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/rawavg.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz --conform_min mri_convert.bin /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/rawavg.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz --conform_min $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/rawavg.mgz... TR=2530.00, TE=1.72, TI=1100.00, flip angle=7.00 i_ras = (-0.11874, -0.992901, -0.00697291) j_ras = (-0.0476783, 0.012716, -0.998782) k_ras = (-0.99178, 0.118263, 0.0488498) changing data type from short to uchar (noscale = 0)... MRIchangeType: Building histogram Reslicing using trilinear interpolation writing to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz... mri_add_xform_to_header -c /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz INFO: extension is mgz #-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Thu Jul 13 06:06:07 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_nu_correct.mni --no-rescale --i orig.mgz --o orig_nu.mgz --n 1 --proto-iters 1000 --distance 50 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni --no-rescale --i orig.mgz --o orig_nu.mgz --n 1 --proto-iters 1000 --distance 50 nIters 1 $Id: mri_nu_correct.mni,v 1.27 2016/02/26 16:19:49 mreuter Exp $ Linux compute-0-37 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thu Jul 13 06:06:07 EDT 2017 Program nu_correct, built from: Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@minerva (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) on 2010-02-20 at 17:32:37 /usr/bin/bc Found /dev/shm , will use for temp dir tmpdir is /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_convert orig.mgz /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu0.mnc -odt float mri_convert.bin orig.mgz /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu0.mnc -odt float $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from orig.mgz... TR=2530.00, TE=1.72, TI=1100.00, flip angle=7.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, -4.97676e-09) j_ras = (4.97676e-09, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 6.22094e-10) changing data type from uchar to float (noscale = 0)... writing to /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu0.mnc... Outputting Volume: ............................................................ -------------------------------------------------------- Iteration 1 Thu Jul 13 06:06:42 EDT 2017 nu_correct -clobber /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu0.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu1.mnc -tmpdir /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/0/ -iterations 1000 -distance 50 [tgholipo@compute-0-37:/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/] [2017-07-13 06:06:42] running: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 1000 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 50 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/0/ /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu0.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu1.imp Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Number of iterations: 6 CV of field change: 0.000972048 [tgholipo@compute-0-37:/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/] [2017-07-13 06:06:58] running: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu0.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/0//template.mnc Transforming slices:...................................................................................................................Done Transforming slices:......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done mri_convert /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu1.mnc orig_nu.mgz --like orig.mgz --conform mri_convert.bin /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu1.mnc orig_nu.mgz --like orig.mgz --conform $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.20878/nu1.mnc... TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, -4.97676e-09) j_ras = (4.97676e-09, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 6.22094e-10) INFO: transform src into the like-volume: orig.mgz changing data type from float to uchar (noscale = 0)... MRIchangeType: Building histogram writing to orig_nu.mgz... Thu Jul 13 06:07:41 EDT 2017 mri_nu_correct.mni done talairach_avi --i orig_nu.mgz --xfm transforms/talairach.auto.xfm talairach_avi log file is transforms/talairach_avi.log... Started at Thu Jul 13 06:07:41 EDT 2017 Ended at Thu Jul 13 06:09:27 EDT 2017 talairach_avi done cp transforms/talairach.auto.xfm transforms/talairach.xfm #-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Failure Detection Thu Jul 13 06:09:30 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri talairach_afd -T 0.005 -xfm transforms/talairach.xfm talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm OK (p=0.6070, pval=0.2817 >= threshold=0.0050) awk -f /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/extract_talairach_avi_QA.awk /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/talairach_avi.log tal_QC_AZS /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/talairach_avi.log TalAviQA: 0.96382 z-score: -3 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Nu Intensity Correction Thu Jul 13 06:09:30 EDT 2017 mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --cm --n 2 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --cm --n 2 nIters 2 $Id: mri_nu_correct.mni,v 1.27 2016/02/26 16:19:49 mreuter Exp $ Linux compute-0-37 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thu Jul 13 06:09:30 EDT 2017 Program nu_correct, built from: Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@minerva (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) on 2010-02-20 at 17:32:37 /usr/bin/bc Found /dev/shm , will use for temp dir tmpdir is /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_convert -cm orig.mgz /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu0.mnc -odt float mri_convert.bin -cm orig.mgz /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu0.mnc -odt float $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from orig.mgz... TR=2530.00, TE=1.72, TI=1100.00, flip angle=7.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, -4.97676e-09) j_ras = (4.97676e-09, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 6.22094e-10) changing data type from uchar to float (noscale = 0)... writing to /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu0.mnc... Outputting Volume: ............................................................ -------------------------------------------------------- Iteration 1 Thu Jul 13 06:10:00 EDT 2017 nu_correct -clobber /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu0.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu1.mnc -tmpdir /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/0/ [tgholipo@compute-0-37:/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/] [2017-07-13 06:10:00] running: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/0/ /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu0.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu1.imp Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Number of iterations: 3 CV of field change: 0.00092834 [tgholipo@compute-0-37:/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/] [2017-07-13 06:10:07] running: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu0.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/0//template.mnc Transforming slices:...................................................................................................................Done Transforming slices:......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done -------------------------------------------------------- Iteration 2 Thu Jul 13 06:10:16 EDT 2017 nu_correct -clobber /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu1.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc -tmpdir /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/1/ [tgholipo@compute-0-37:/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/] [2017-07-13 06:10:16] running: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/1/ /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu1.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.imp Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Processing:.......................................................................................Done Number of iterations: 3 CV of field change: 0.000956514 [tgholipo@compute-0-37:/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/] [2017-07-13 06:10:24] running: /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu1.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/1//template.mnc Transforming slices:...................................................................................................................Done Transforming slices:......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done mri_binarize --i /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc --min -1 --o /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz $Id: mri_binarize.c,v 1.43 2016/06/09 20:46:21 greve Exp $ cwd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri cmdline mri_binarize.bin --i /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc --min -1 --o /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 user tgholipo input /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc frame 0 nErode3d 0 nErode2d 0 output /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz Binarizing based on threshold min -1 max +infinity binval 1 binvalnot 0 fstart = 0, fend = 0, nframes = 1 Found 40001688 values in range Counting number of voxels in first frame Found 40001688 voxels in final mask Count: 40001688 16777216.061522 40001688 100.000000 mri_binarize done mri_segstats --id 1 --seg /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz --i orig.mgz --sum /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/sum.junk --avgwf /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/input.mean.dat $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.122 2017/01/23 18:23:14 greve Exp $ cwd cmdline mri_segstats --id 1 --seg /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz --i orig.mgz --sum /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/sum.junk --avgwf /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/input.mean.dat sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 user tgholipo whitesurfname white UseRobust 0 Loading /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz Loading orig.mgz Voxel Volume is 0.419413 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 1 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation Reporting on 1 segmentations Using PrintSegStat Computing spatial average of each frame 0 Writing to /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/input.mean.dat mri_segstats done mri_segstats --id 1 --seg /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz --i /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc --sum /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/sum.junk --avgwf /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/output.mean.dat $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.122 2017/01/23 18:23:14 greve Exp $ cwd cmdline mri_segstats --id 1 --seg /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz --i /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc --sum /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/sum.junk --avgwf /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/output.mean.dat sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 user tgholipo whitesurfname white UseRobust 0 Loading /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/ones.mgz Loading /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc Voxel Volume is 0.419413 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 1 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation Reporting on 1 segmentations Using PrintSegStat Computing spatial average of each frame 0 Writing to /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/output.mean.dat mri_segstats done mris_calc -o /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc mul .97573482649631092473 Saving result to '/dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc' (type = MINC )Outputting Volume: ............................................................ [ ok ] mri_convert /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc nu.mgz --like orig.mgz mri_convert.bin /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc nu.mgz --like orig.mgz $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from /dev/shm/tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.21234/nu2.mnc... TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, -4.97676e-09) j_ras = (4.97676e-09, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 6.22094e-10) INFO: transform src into the like-volume: orig.mgz writing to nu.mgz... mri_make_uchar nu.mgz transforms/talairach.xfm nu.mgz type change took 0 minutes and 28 seconds. mapping (13, 209) to ( 3, 110) Thu Jul 13 06:13:53 EDT 2017 mri_nu_correct.mni done mri_add_xform_to_header -c /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm nu.mgz nu.mgz INFO: extension is mgz #-------------------------------------------- #@# Intensity Normalization Thu Jul 13 06:13:57 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_normalize -g 1 -mprage -noconform nu.mgz T1.mgz using max gradient = 1.000 assuming input volume is MGH (Van der Kouwe) MP-RAGE not interpolating and embedding volume to be 256^3... reading from nu.mgz... normalizing image... talairach transform 1.13374 -0.11502 -0.07346 -10.36661; 0.11834 0.95192 0.26449 -53.43629; 0.03985 -0.33074 1.00580 28.98155; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; processing without aseg, no1d=0 MRInormInit(): INFO: Modifying talairach volume c_(r,a,s) based on average_305 MRInormalize(): MRIsplineNormalize(): npeaks = 20 Starting OpenSpline(): npoints = 20 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8... Iterating 2 times --------------------------------- 3d normalization pass 1 of 2 white matter peak found at 110 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 81 (81) csf peak at 51, setting threshold to 75 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8... --------------------------------- 3d normalization pass 2 of 2 white matter peak found at 110 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 77 (77) csf peak at 50, setting threshold to 75 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8... Done iterating --------------------------------- writing output to T1.mgz 3D bias adjustment took 8 minutes and 34 seconds. #-------------------------------------------- #@# Skull Stripping Thu Jul 13 06:22:34 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_em_register -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mri_em_register.skull.dat -skull nu.mgz /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_withskull_2016-05-10.vc700.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta aligning to atlas containing skull, setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 5 == Number of threads available to mri_em_register for OpenMP = 4 == reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach_with_skull.log reading '/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_withskull_2016-05-10.vc700.gca'... average std = 22.9 using min determinant for regularization = 52.6 0 singular and 9002 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized reading 'nu.mgz'... freeing gibbs priors...done. accounting for voxel sizes in initial transform bounding unknown intensity as < 8.7 or > 569.1 total sample mean = 77.6 (1399 zeros) ************************************************ spacing=8, using 3243 sample points, tol=1.00e-05... ************************************************ register_mri: find_optimal_transform find_optimal_transform: nsamples 3243, passno 0, spacing 8 resetting wm mean[0]: 100 --> 108 resetting gm mean[0]: 61 --> 61 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=5.0 skull bounding box = (61, 15, 10) --> (280, 253, 306) using (134, 94, 158) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 108, using box (107,65,121) --> (161, 123,194) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 109 robust fit to distribution - 109 +- 3.2 after smoothing, mri peak at 109, scaling input intensities by 0.991 scaling channel 0 by 0.990826 initial log_p = -4.471 ************************************************ First Search limited to translation only. ************************************************ max log p = -4.363807 @ (-9.091, 27.273, -9.091) max log p = -4.287217 @ (4.545, -4.545, 4.545) max log p = -4.275186 @ (2.273, -2.273, 2.273) max log p = -4.275186 @ (0.000, 0.000, 0.000) max log p = -4.267426 @ (-3.977, 0.568, 1.705) max log p = -4.264182 @ (-3.125, -1.420, 0.852) Found translation: (-9.4, 19.6, 0.3): log p = -4.264 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 0 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-4.239, old_max_log_p =-4.264 (thresh=-4.3) 0.80468 0.00000 0.00000 -15.14106; 0.00000 0.74213 0.09770 9.16916; 0.00000 -0.09770 0.74213 16.35762; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 1 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-4.106, old_max_log_p =-4.239 (thresh=-4.2) 0.79756 -0.00021 0.09933 -24.74149; -0.02718 0.72347 0.19044 5.72510; -0.09552 -0.17770 0.66328 52.40505; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 2 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-4.106, old_max_log_p =-4.106 (thresh=-4.1) 0.79756 -0.00021 0.09933 -24.74149; -0.02718 0.72347 0.19044 5.72510; -0.09552 -0.17770 0.66328 52.40505; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; reducing scale to 0.2500 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 3 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-4.036, old_max_log_p =-4.106 (thresh=-4.1) 0.78309 -0.02257 0.09154 -18.89899; -0.00014 0.75013 0.20095 -3.97600; -0.09731 -0.18103 0.67572 48.65095; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 4 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-4.036, old_max_log_p =-4.036 (thresh=-4.0) 0.78309 -0.02257 0.09154 -18.89899; -0.00014 0.75013 0.20095 -3.97600; -0.09731 -0.18103 0.67572 48.65095; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; reducing scale to 0.0625 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 5 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-4.027, old_max_log_p =-4.036 (thresh=-4.0) 0.78493 -0.02262 0.09176 -19.33588; -0.00014 0.74749 0.20024 -3.76169; -0.09697 -0.18039 0.67334 48.53428; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 6 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-4.018, old_max_log_p =-4.027 (thresh=-4.0) 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 7 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-4.018, old_max_log_p =-4.018 (thresh=-4.0) 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; min search scale 0.025000 reached *********************************************** Computing MAP estimate using 3243 samples... *********************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 3243 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; outof QuasiNewtonEMA: 010: -log(p) = -0.0 tol 0.000010 Resulting transform: 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -4.018 (old=-4.471) transform before final EM align: 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; ************************************************** EM alignment process ... Computing final MAP estimate using 364799 samples. ************************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 364799 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; outof QuasiNewtonEMA: 012: -log(p) = 4.4 tol 0.000000 final transform: 0.78585 -0.02265 0.09186 -19.55483; -0.00014 0.74662 0.20001 -3.53407; -0.09674 -0.17997 0.67177 48.76945; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; writing output transformation to transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta... mri_em_register utimesec 1996.370505 mri_em_register stimesec 2.754581 mri_em_register ru_maxrss 839208 mri_em_register ru_ixrss 0 mri_em_register ru_idrss 0 mri_em_register ru_isrss 0 mri_em_register ru_minflt 219199 mri_em_register ru_majflt 1 mri_em_register ru_nswap 0 mri_em_register ru_inblock 149440 mri_em_register ru_oublock 24 mri_em_register ru_msgsnd 0 mri_em_register ru_msgrcv 0 mri_em_register ru_nsignals 0 mri_em_register ru_nvcsw 5562 mri_em_register ru_nivcsw 15050 registration took 9 minutes and 7 seconds. mri_watershed -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mri_watershed.dat -T1 -brain_atlas /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_withskull_2016-05-10.vc700.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta T1.mgz brainmask.auto.mgz Mode: T1 normalized volume Mode: Use the information of atlas (default parms, --help for details) ********************************************************* The input file is T1.mgz The output file is brainmask.auto.mgz conforming input... updating LTA to account for conformation Weighting the input with atlas information before watershed *************************WATERSHED************************** Sorting... first estimation of the COG coord: x=133 y=90 z=106 r=82 first estimation of the main basin volume: 2321097 voxels Looking for seedpoints 2 found in the cerebellum 18 found in the rest of the brain global maximum in x=110, y=84, z=66, Imax=255 CSF=11, WM_intensity=110, WM_VARIANCE=5 WM_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MAX=110, WM_MAX=110 preflooding height equal to 10 percent done. Analyze... main basin size=429569198 voxels, voxel volume =1.000 = 429569198 mmm3 = 429569.184 cm3 done. PostAnalyze...Basin Prior 78 basins merged thanks to atlas ***** 0 basin(s) merged in 1 iteration(s) ***** 0 voxel(s) added to the main basin done. Weighting the input with prior template ****************TEMPLATE DEFORMATION**************** second estimation of the COG coord: x=128,y=107, z=104, r=11578 iterations ^^^^^^^^ couldn't find WM with original limits - expanding ^^^^^^ GLOBAL CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=11 , nb = 37884 RIGHT_CER CSF_MIN=0, CSF_intensity=4, CSF_MAX=13 , nb = -1031476880 LEFT_CER CSF_MIN=0, CSF_intensity=32, CSF_MAX=41 , nb = -1047356314 RIGHT_BRAIN CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=8 , nb = -1069669018 LEFT_BRAIN CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=12 , nb = 1084431644 OTHER CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=13 , nb = 1066049218 CSF_MAX TRANSITION GM_MIN GM GLOBAL before analyzing : 11, 13, 30, 89 after analyzing : 11, 24, 30, 40 RIGHT_CER before analyzing : 13, 23, 58, 89 after analyzing : 13, 46, 58, 56 LEFT_CER before analyzing : 41, 42, 48, 77 after analyzing : 41, 46, 48, 53 RIGHT_BRAIN before analyzing : 8, 10, 30, 90 after analyzing : 8, 23, 30, 39 LEFT_BRAIN before analyzing : 12, 14, 30, 88 after analyzing : 12, 24, 30, 40 OTHER before analyzing : 13, 37, 73, 89 after analyzing : 13, 61, 73, 68 mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain highly tesselated surface with 10242 vertices matching...74 iterations *********************VALIDATION********************* curvature mean = -0.012, std = 0.014 curvature mean = 74.893, std = 9.993 No Rigid alignment: -atlas Mode Off (basic atlas / no registration) before rotation: sse = 7.15, sigma = 16.42 after rotation: sse = 7.15, sigma = 16.42 Localization of inacurate regions: Erosion-Dilation steps the sse mean is 10.89, its var is 16.61 before Erosion-Dilatation 10.89% of inacurate vertices after Erosion-Dilatation 12.18% of inacurate vertices Validation of the shape of the surface done. Scaling of atlas fields onto current surface fields ********FINAL ITERATIVE TEMPLATE DEFORMATION******** Compute Local values csf/gray Fine Segmentation...47 iterations mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain Brain Size = 2165623 voxels, voxel volume = 1.000 mm3 = 2165623 mmm3 = 2165.623 cm3 INFO: MRImask() using MRImaskDifferentGeometry() ****************************** Saving brainmask.auto.mgz done mri_watershed utimesec 71.572119 mri_watershed stimesec 0.785880 mri_watershed ru_maxrss 844816 mri_watershed ru_ixrss 0 mri_watershed ru_idrss 0 mri_watershed ru_isrss 0 mri_watershed ru_minflt 218396 mri_watershed ru_majflt 0 mri_watershed ru_nswap 0 mri_watershed ru_inblock 8920 mri_watershed ru_oublock 7840 mri_watershed ru_msgsnd 0 mri_watershed ru_msgrcv 0 mri_watershed ru_nsignals 0 mri_watershed ru_nvcsw 9454 mri_watershed ru_nivcsw 547 mri_watershed done cp brainmask.auto.mgz brainmask.mgz #------------------------------------- #@# EM Registration Thu Jul 13 06:32:41 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_em_register -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mri_em_register.dat -uns 3 -mask brainmask.mgz nu.mgz /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca transforms/talairach.lta setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 3 using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... == Number of threads available to mri_em_register for OpenMP = 4 == reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach.log reading '/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca'... average std = 7.3 using min determinant for regularization = 5.3 0 singular and 841 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized reading 'nu.mgz'... freeing gibbs priors...done. accounting for voxel sizes in initial transform bounding unknown intensity as < 6.3 or > 503.7 total sample mean = 78.8 (1011 zeros) ************************************************ spacing=8, using 2830 sample points, tol=1.00e-05... ************************************************ register_mri: find_optimal_transform find_optimal_transform: nsamples 2830, passno 0, spacing 8 resetting wm mean[0]: 98 --> 107 resetting gm mean[0]: 61 --> 61 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=19.9 skull bounding box = (88, 38, 36) --> (257, 248, 277) using (144, 108, 157) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 107, using box (123,82,127) --> (164, 133,186) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 109 robust fit to distribution - 109 +- 3.1 after smoothing, mri peak at 109, scaling input intensities by 0.982 scaling channel 0 by 0.981651 initial log_p = -4.414 ************************************************ First Search limited to translation only. ************************************************ max log p = -4.129805 @ (-9.091, 27.273, 9.091) max log p = -4.053561 @ (4.545, -4.545, -4.545) max log p = -4.004011 @ (6.818, 2.273, -6.818) max log p = -3.990010 @ (-1.136, 3.409, -3.409) max log p = -3.966563 @ (1.705, -0.568, -0.568) max log p = -3.964112 @ (0.284, 0.852, -0.852) Found translation: (3.1, 28.7, -7.1): log p = -3.964 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 0 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-3.707, old_max_log_p =-3.964 (thresh=-4.0) 0.84615 -0.11569 0.05424 -11.04721; 0.11140 0.71404 0.20255 -23.07137; -0.11236 -0.16327 0.60932 59.37704; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 1 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-3.707, old_max_log_p =-3.707 (thresh=-3.7) 0.84615 -0.11569 0.05424 -11.04721; 0.11140 0.71404 0.20255 -23.07137; -0.11236 -0.16327 0.60932 59.37704; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; reducing scale to 0.2500 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 2 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-3.587, old_max_log_p =-3.707 (thresh=-3.7) 0.80852 -0.01581 0.06125 -16.51542; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 3 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-3.587, old_max_log_p =-3.587 (thresh=-3.6) 0.80852 -0.01581 0.06125 -16.51542; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; reducing scale to 0.0625 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 4 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-3.551, old_max_log_p =-3.587 (thresh=-3.6) 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 5 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-3.551, old_max_log_p =-3.551 (thresh=-3.5) 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; min search scale 0.025000 reached *********************************************** Computing MAP estimate using 2830 samples... *********************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 2830 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; outof QuasiNewtonEMA: 008: -log(p) = -0.0 tol 0.000010 Resulting transform: 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -3.551 (old=-4.414) transform before final EM align: 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; ************************************************** EM alignment process ... Computing final MAP estimate using 315557 samples. ************************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 315557 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; outof QuasiNewtonEMA: 010: -log(p) = 4.1 tol 0.000000 final transform: 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.lta... mri_em_register utimesec 1277.291822 mri_em_register stimesec 2.134675 mri_em_register ru_maxrss 826792 mri_em_register ru_ixrss 0 mri_em_register ru_idrss 0 mri_em_register ru_isrss 0 mri_em_register ru_minflt 226579 mri_em_register ru_majflt 0 mri_em_register ru_nswap 0 mri_em_register ru_inblock 140152 mri_em_register ru_oublock 24 mri_em_register ru_msgsnd 0 mri_em_register ru_msgrcv 0 mri_em_register ru_nsignals 0 mri_em_register ru_nvcsw 6084 mri_em_register ru_nivcsw 10306 registration took 5 minutes and 50 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# CA Normalize Thu Jul 13 06:38:31 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_ca_normalize -c ctrl_pts.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz nu.mgz /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca transforms/talairach.lta norm.mgz writing control point volume to ctrl_pts.mgz using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... reading 1 input volume reading atlas from '/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca'... reading transform from 'transforms/talairach.lta'... reading input volume from nu.mgz... resetting wm mean[0]: 98 --> 107 resetting gm mean[0]: 61 --> 61 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=18.0 skull bounding box = (88, 38, 35) --> (257, 249, 277) using (144, 108, 156) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 107, using box (123,82,126) --> (164, 134,185) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 109 robust fit to distribution - 109 +- 3.1 after smoothing, mri peak at 109, scaling input intensities by 0.982 scaling channel 0 by 0.981651 using 246344 sample points... INFO: compute sample coordinates transform 0.80663 -0.01578 0.06111 -17.01582; -0.00368 0.73086 0.21723 -7.26590; -0.09268 -0.18687 0.60443 61.72868; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; INFO: transform used finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 39915 control points for structure... bounding box (165, 43, 25) --> (253, 206, 279) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 98.0 --> 132.0 10 of 7335 (0.1%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 39557 control points for structure... bounding box (90, 44, 17) --> (173, 196, 277) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 97.0 --> 132.0 23 of 8007 (0.3%) samples deleted finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 3059 control points for structure... bounding box (174, 170, 73) --> (234, 225, 155) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 94.0 --> 132.0 0 of 30 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 2705 control points for structure... bounding box (119, 170, 62) --> (175, 226, 151) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 98.0 --> 132.0 0 of 161 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Brain_Stem.... found 3518 control points for structure... bounding box (150, 147, 123) --> (192, 241, 171) Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 90.0 --> 116.0 1 of 315 (0.3%) samples deleted using 15848 total control points for intensity normalization... bias field = 0.985 +- 0.050 212 of 15814 control points discarded finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 39915 control points for structure... bounding box (165, 43, 25) --> (253, 206, 279) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 92.0 --> 129.0 10 of 7508 (0.1%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 39557 control points for structure... bounding box (90, 44, 17) --> (173, 196, 277) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 92.0 --> 129.0 22 of 8177 (0.3%) samples deleted finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 3059 control points for structure... bounding box (174, 170, 73) --> (234, 225, 155) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 129.0 9 of 82 (11.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 2705 control points for structure... bounding box (119, 170, 62) --> (175, 226, 151) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 129.0 10 of 204 (4.9%) samples deleted finding control points in Brain_Stem.... found 3518 control points for structure... bounding box (150, 147, 123) --> (192, 241, 171) Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 104.0 23 of 419 (5.5%) samples deleted using 16390 total control points for intensity normalization... bias field = 1.024 +- 0.041 140 of 16265 control points discarded finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 39915 control points for structure... bounding box (165, 43, 25) --> (253, 206, 279) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 92.0 --> 131.0 10 of 7491 (0.1%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 39557 control points for structure... bounding box (90, 44, 17) --> (173, 196, 277) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 91.0 --> 131.0 16 of 8160 (0.2%) samples deleted finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 3059 control points for structure... bounding box (174, 170, 73) --> (234, 225, 155) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 131.0 41 of 91 (45.1%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 2705 control points for structure... bounding box (119, 170, 62) --> (175, 226, 151) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 131.0 118 of 219 (53.9%) samples deleted finding control points in Brain_Stem.... found 3518 control points for structure... bounding box (150, 147, 123) --> (192, 241, 171) Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 88.0 --> 102.0 98 of 489 (20.0%) samples deleted using 16450 total control points for intensity normalization... bias field = 1.018 +- 0.036 115 of 16051 control points discarded writing normalized volume to norm.mgz... writing control points to ctrl_pts.mgz freeing GCA...done. normalization took 4 minutes and 28 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# CA Reg Thu Jul 13 06:42:59 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_ca_register -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mri_ca_register.dat -nobigventricles -T transforms/talairach.lta -align-after -mask brainmask.mgz norm.mgz /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca transforms/talairach.m3z not handling expanded ventricles... using previously computed transform transforms/talairach.lta renormalizing sequences with structure alignment, equivalent to: -renormalize -regularize_mean 0.500 -regularize 0.500 using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... == Number of threads available to mri_ca_register for OpenMP = 4 == reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach.log reading input volume 'norm.mgz'... reading GCA '/usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca'... label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) det(m_affine) = 0.39 (predicted orig area = 20.3) label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) freeing gibbs priors...done. average std[0] = 5.0 **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ enabling zero nodes setting smoothness coefficient to 0.156 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.948, neg=0, invalid=762 0001: dt=490.927101, rms=0.873 (7.938%), neg=0, invalid=762 0002: dt=312.848656, rms=0.855 (2.010%), neg=0, invalid=762 0003: dt=517.888000, rms=0.841 (1.709%), neg=0, invalid=762 0004: dt=295.936000, rms=0.833 (0.892%), neg=0, invalid=762 0005: dt=443.904000, rms=0.828 (0.587%), neg=0, invalid=762 0006: dt=295.936000, rms=0.825 (0.443%), neg=0, invalid=762 0007: dt=295.936000, rms=0.823 (0.248%), neg=0, invalid=762 0008: dt=295.936000, rms=0.821 (0.246%), neg=0, invalid=762 0009: dt=295.936000, rms=0.818 (0.331%), neg=0, invalid=762 0010: dt=295.936000, rms=0.814 (0.447%), neg=0, invalid=762 0011: dt=295.936000, rms=0.811 (0.362%), neg=0, invalid=762 0012: dt=295.936000, rms=0.808 (0.393%), neg=0, invalid=762 0013: dt=295.936000, rms=0.806 (0.246%), neg=0, invalid=762 0014: dt=295.936000, rms=0.804 (0.264%), neg=0, invalid=762 0015: dt=295.936000, rms=0.803 (0.165%), neg=0, invalid=762 0016: dt=295.936000, rms=0.801 (0.208%), neg=0, invalid=762 0017: dt=295.936000, rms=0.800 (0.178%), neg=0, invalid=762 0018: dt=295.936000, rms=0.798 (0.170%), neg=0, invalid=762 0019: dt=295.936000, rms=0.797 (0.108%), neg=0, invalid=762 0020: dt=295.936000, rms=0.796 (0.147%), neg=0, invalid=762 0021: dt=295.936000, rms=0.796 (0.081%), neg=0, invalid=762 0022: dt=295.936000, rms=0.795 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=762 0023: dt=517.888000, rms=0.795 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=762 0024: dt=517.888000, rms=0.795 (-0.039%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.795, neg=0, invalid=762 0025: dt=129.472000, rms=0.794 (0.125%), neg=0, invalid=762 0026: dt=18.496000, rms=0.794 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=762 0027: dt=18.496000, rms=0.794 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.615 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.824, neg=0, invalid=762 0028: dt=81.454545, rms=0.819 (0.556%), neg=0, invalid=762 0029: dt=145.152000, rms=0.816 (0.432%), neg=0, invalid=762 0030: dt=414.720000, rms=0.810 (0.643%), neg=0, invalid=762 0031: dt=124.416000, rms=0.808 (0.285%), neg=0, invalid=762 0032: dt=124.416000, rms=0.807 (0.104%), neg=0, invalid=762 0033: dt=124.416000, rms=0.806 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=762 0034: dt=124.416000, rms=0.805 (0.175%), neg=0, invalid=762 0035: dt=124.416000, rms=0.804 (0.127%), neg=0, invalid=762 0036: dt=124.416000, rms=0.802 (0.196%), neg=0, invalid=762 0037: dt=124.416000, rms=0.801 (0.162%), neg=0, invalid=762 0038: dt=124.416000, rms=0.800 (0.132%), neg=0, invalid=762 0039: dt=124.416000, rms=0.799 (0.107%), neg=0, invalid=762 0040: dt=124.416000, rms=0.798 (0.081%), neg=0, invalid=762 0041: dt=36.288000, rms=0.798 (0.034%), neg=0, invalid=762 0042: dt=36.288000, rms=0.798 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=762 0043: dt=36.288000, rms=0.798 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=762 0044: dt=36.288000, rms=0.798 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=762 0045: dt=36.288000, rms=0.798 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.798, neg=0, invalid=762 0046: dt=0.000000, rms=0.798 (0.081%), neg=0, invalid=762 0047: dt=0.000000, rms=0.798 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0048: dt=0.450000, rms=0.798 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 2.353 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.843, neg=0, invalid=762 0049: dt=8.000000, rms=0.839 (0.462%), neg=0, invalid=762 0050: dt=1.600000, rms=0.839 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0051: dt=1.600000, rms=0.839 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0052: dt=1.600000, rms=0.839 (-0.030%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.840, neg=0, invalid=762 0053: dt=0.000000, rms=0.839 (0.072%), neg=0, invalid=762 0054: dt=0.000000, rms=0.839 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 8.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.926, neg=0, invalid=762 0055: dt=3.229907, rms=0.904 (2.363%), neg=0, invalid=762 0056: dt=3.403423, rms=0.895 (0.990%), neg=0, invalid=762 0057: dt=2.076726, rms=0.892 (0.366%), neg=0, invalid=762 0058: dt=2.901099, rms=0.890 (0.168%), neg=0, invalid=762 0059: dt=2.901099, rms=0.889 (0.119%), neg=0, invalid=762 0060: dt=2.901099, rms=0.889 (0.057%), neg=0, invalid=762 0061: dt=2.901099, rms=0.889 (-0.152%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.889, neg=0, invalid=762 0062: dt=0.000000, rms=0.889 (0.067%), neg=0, invalid=762 0063: dt=0.000000, rms=0.889 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 20.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.941, neg=0, invalid=762 0064: dt=0.112000, rms=0.940 (0.091%), neg=0, invalid=762 0065: dt=0.112000, rms=0.940 (0.014%), neg=0, invalid=762 0066: dt=0.112000, rms=0.940 (0.011%), neg=0, invalid=762 0067: dt=0.112000, rms=0.940 (0.018%), neg=0, invalid=762 0068: dt=0.112000, rms=0.939 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=762 0069: dt=0.112000, rms=0.939 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=762 0070: dt=0.112000, rms=0.938 (0.093%), neg=0, invalid=762 0071: dt=0.112000, rms=0.937 (0.128%), neg=0, invalid=762 0072: dt=0.112000, rms=0.935 (0.121%), neg=0, invalid=762 0073: dt=0.112000, rms=0.934 (0.115%), neg=0, invalid=762 0074: dt=0.448000, rms=0.934 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=762 0075: dt=0.448000, rms=0.933 (0.151%), neg=0, invalid=762 0076: dt=0.448000, rms=0.932 (0.110%), neg=0, invalid=762 0077: dt=0.448000, rms=0.931 (0.104%), neg=0, invalid=762 0078: dt=1.024000, rms=0.929 (0.161%), neg=0, invalid=762 0079: dt=0.112000, rms=0.929 (0.031%), neg=0, invalid=762 0080: dt=0.112000, rms=0.929 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 0081: dt=0.112000, rms=0.929 (-0.027%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.929, neg=0, invalid=762 0082: dt=0.080000, rms=0.929 (0.063%), neg=0, invalid=762 0083: dt=0.064000, rms=0.929 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 0084: dt=0.064000, rms=0.929 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 40.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.874, neg=0, invalid=762 0085: dt=0.112000, rms=0.871 (0.340%), neg=0, invalid=762 0086: dt=0.001750, rms=0.871 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 0087: dt=0.001750, rms=0.871 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.871, neg=0, invalid=762 0088: dt=0.007000, rms=0.871 (0.072%), neg=0, invalid=762 0089: dt=0.003000, rms=0.871 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 renormalizing by structure alignment.... renormalizing input #0 gca peak = 0.10027 (20) mri peak = 0.25562 (53) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 2.60 x + 0.0 (10923 voxels, overlap=0.003) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (10923 voxels, peak = 52), gca=30.0 gca peak = 0.15565 (16) mri peak = 0.21416 (53) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 3.28 x + 0.0 (8173 voxels, overlap=0.003) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (8173 voxels, peak = 52), gca=24.0 gca peak = 0.26829 (96) mri peak = 0.12728 (103) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (3919 voxels, overlap=0.524) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (3919 voxels, peak = 102), gca=102.2 gca peak = 0.20183 (93) mri peak = 0.11163 (103) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (3615 voxels, overlap=0.798) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (3615 voxels, peak = 99), gca=99.0 gca peak = 0.21683 (55) mri peak = 0.06961 (76) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (4221 voxels, overlap=0.015) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (4221 voxels, peak = 71), gca=71.2 gca peak = 0.30730 (58) mri peak = 0.06524 (73) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (3548 voxels, overlap=0.021) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (3548 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.4 gca peak = 0.11430 (101) mri peak = 0.14465 (106) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (292998 voxels, overlap=0.549) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (292998 voxels, peak = 105), gca=104.5 gca peak = 0.12076 (102) mri peak = 0.14708 (106) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (291613 voxels, overlap=0.587) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (291613 voxels, peak = 106), gca=105.6 gca peak = 0.14995 (59) mri peak = 0.04381 (87) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.51 x + 0.0 (166000 voxels, overlap=0.000) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.51 x + 0.0 (166000 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.4 gca peak = 0.15082 (58) mri peak = 0.03785 (90) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.49 x + 0.0 (162326 voxels, overlap=0.000) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.49 x + 0.0 (162326 voxels, peak = 86), gca=86.1 gca peak = 0.14161 (67) mri peak = 0.14445 (53) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 0.76 x + 0.0 (3136 voxels, overlap=0.026) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 0.76 x + 0.0 (3136 voxels, peak = 51), gca=51.3 gca peak = 0.15243 (71) mri peak = 0.08648 (96) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (3799 voxels, overlap=0.019) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (3799 voxels, peak = 91), gca=90.5 gca peak = 0.13336 (57) mri peak = 0.02405 ( 5) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (59299 voxels, overlap=0.000) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (59299 voxels, peak = 79), gca=78.9 gca peak = 0.13252 (56) mri peak = 0.03026 ( 5) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.39 x + 0.0 (69031 voxels, overlap=0.000) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.39 x + 0.0 (69031 voxels, peak = 78), gca=78.1 gca peak = 0.18181 (84) mri peak = 0.06956 (87) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.04 x + 0.0 (26394 voxels, overlap=0.730) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.04 x + 0.0 (26394 voxels, peak = 88), gca=87.8 gca peak = 0.20573 (83) mri peak = 0.10514 (85) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (25656 voxels, overlap=0.679) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (25656 voxels, peak = 86), gca=85.9 gca peak = 0.21969 (57) mri peak = 0.09401 (80) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (2021 voxels, overlap=0.057) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (2021 voxels, peak = 80), gca=80.1 gca peak = 0.39313 (56) mri peak = 0.10284 (79) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (2218 voxels, overlap=0.057) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (2218 voxels, peak = 78), gca=77.6 gca peak = 0.14181 (85) mri peak = 0.11638 (104) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (16780 voxels, overlap=0.006) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (16780 voxels, peak = 102), gca=101.6 gca peak = 0.11978 (83) mri peak = 0.10441 (102) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.22 x + 0.0 (14939 voxels, overlap=0.006) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.22 x + 0.0 (14939 voxels, peak = 101), gca=100.8 gca peak = 0.13399 (79) mri peak = 0.06312 (90) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.24 x + 0.0 (9561 voxels, overlap=0.013) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.24 x + 0.0 (9561 voxels, peak = 98), gca=97.6 gca peak = 0.14159 (79) mri peak = 0.05895 (97) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (9461 voxels, overlap=0.016) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.27 x + 0.0 (9461 voxels, peak = 101), gca=100.7 gca peak = 0.10025 (80) mri peak = 0.09417 (88) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (40540 voxels, overlap=0.402) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (40540 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.2 gca peak = 0.13281 (86) mri peak = 0.08717 (98) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (5902 voxels, overlap=0.299) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (5902 voxels, peak = 97), gca=96.8 gca peak = 0.12801 (89) mri peak = 0.08982 (98) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (6062 voxels, overlap=0.537) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (6062 voxels, peak = 97), gca=97.5 gca peak = 0.20494 (23) mri peak = 0.32172 (51) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 2.17 x + 0.0 (331 voxels, overlap=0.031) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 2.17 x + 0.0 (331 voxels, peak = 50), gca=50.0 gca peak = 0.15061 (21) mri peak = 0.08204 (27) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.59 x + 0.0 (1914 voxels, overlap=0.542) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.59 x + 0.0 (1914 voxels, peak = 33), gca=33.3 gca peak Unknown = 0.94835 ( 0) gca peak Left_Cerebral_Cortex = 0.14995 (59) gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.18056 (32) gca peak Left_Thalamus = 0.64095 (94) gca peak Third_Ventricle = 0.20494 (23) gca peak Fourth_Ventricle = 0.15061 (21) gca peak CSF = 0.20999 (34) gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.39030 (62) gca peak Left_undetermined = 0.95280 (25) gca peak Left_vessel = 0.67734 (53) gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.09433 (44) gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.23544 (26) gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.30312 (64) gca peak Right_vessel = 0.46315 (51) gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.14086 (44) gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.51669 (36) gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.09722 (76) gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.11899 (47) gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.39033 (72) label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) not using caudate to estimate GM means setting label Left_Cerebral_Cortex based on Right_Cerebral_Cortex = 1.49 x + 0: 86 estimating mean gm scale to be 1.39 x + 0.0 estimating mean wm scale to be 1.03 x + 0.0 estimating mean csf scale to be 1.50 x + 0.0 Left_Putamen too bright - rescaling by 0.969 (from 1.235) to 94.5 (was 97.6) Right_Putamen too bright - rescaling by 0.939 (from 1.275) to 94.5 (was 100.7) Right_Pallidum too bright - rescaling by 0.997 (from 1.065) to 101.9 (was 102.2) saving intensity scales to talairach.label_intensities.txt **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ enabling zero nodes setting smoothness coefficient to 0.008 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.918, neg=0, invalid=762 0090: dt=353.615923, rms=0.830 (9.581%), neg=0, invalid=762 0091: dt=443.904000, rms=0.794 (4.416%), neg=0, invalid=762 0092: dt=295.936000, rms=0.783 (1.273%), neg=0, invalid=762 0093: dt=517.888000, rms=0.769 (1.781%), neg=0, invalid=762 0094: dt=221.952000, rms=0.765 (0.628%), neg=0, invalid=762 0095: dt=1183.744000, rms=0.753 (1.470%), neg=0, invalid=762 0096: dt=166.054054, rms=0.749 (0.597%), neg=0, invalid=762 0097: dt=1775.616000, rms=0.740 (1.212%), neg=0, invalid=762 0098: dt=369.920000, rms=0.735 (0.605%), neg=0, invalid=762 0099: dt=129.472000, rms=0.735 (0.054%), neg=0, invalid=762 0100: dt=517.888000, rms=0.734 (0.087%), neg=0, invalid=762 0101: dt=517.888000, rms=0.732 (0.306%), neg=0, invalid=762 0102: dt=129.472000, rms=0.732 (0.048%), neg=0, invalid=762 0103: dt=129.472000, rms=0.732 (0.025%), neg=0, invalid=762 0104: dt=129.472000, rms=0.731 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=762 0105: dt=129.472000, rms=0.731 (0.079%), neg=0, invalid=762 0106: dt=129.472000, rms=0.730 (0.137%), neg=0, invalid=762 0107: dt=129.472000, rms=0.728 (0.177%), neg=0, invalid=762 0108: dt=129.472000, rms=0.727 (0.172%), neg=0, invalid=762 0109: dt=129.472000, rms=0.726 (0.157%), neg=0, invalid=762 0110: dt=129.472000, rms=0.725 (0.142%), neg=0, invalid=762 0111: dt=129.472000, rms=0.724 (0.127%), neg=0, invalid=762 0112: dt=129.472000, rms=0.723 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=762 0113: dt=129.472000, rms=0.722 (0.153%), neg=0, invalid=762 0114: dt=129.472000, rms=0.721 (0.163%), neg=0, invalid=762 0115: dt=129.472000, rms=0.720 (0.169%), neg=0, invalid=762 0116: dt=129.472000, rms=0.718 (0.157%), neg=0, invalid=762 0117: dt=129.472000, rms=0.717 (0.135%), neg=0, invalid=762 0118: dt=129.472000, rms=0.717 (0.123%), neg=0, invalid=762 0119: dt=129.472000, rms=0.716 (0.123%), neg=0, invalid=762 0120: dt=129.472000, rms=0.715 (0.143%), neg=0, invalid=762 0121: dt=129.472000, rms=0.713 (0.170%), neg=0, invalid=762 0122: dt=129.472000, rms=0.712 (0.153%), neg=0, invalid=762 0123: dt=129.472000, rms=0.711 (0.134%), neg=0, invalid=762 0124: dt=129.472000, rms=0.711 (0.117%), neg=0, invalid=762 0125: dt=129.472000, rms=0.710 (0.110%), neg=0, invalid=762 0126: dt=129.472000, rms=0.709 (0.097%), neg=0, invalid=762 0127: dt=129.472000, rms=0.708 (0.088%), neg=0, invalid=762 0128: dt=129.472000, rms=0.708 (0.105%), neg=0, invalid=762 0129: dt=129.472000, rms=0.707 (0.105%), neg=0, invalid=762 0130: dt=129.472000, rms=0.706 (0.098%), neg=0, invalid=762 0131: dt=129.472000, rms=0.706 (0.084%), neg=0, invalid=762 0132: dt=129.472000, rms=0.705 (0.072%), neg=0, invalid=762 0133: dt=129.472000, rms=0.705 (0.069%), neg=0, invalid=762 0134: dt=129.472000, rms=0.704 (0.072%), neg=0, invalid=762 0135: dt=129.472000, rms=0.704 (0.080%), neg=0, invalid=762 0136: dt=129.472000, rms=0.703 (0.088%), neg=0, invalid=762 0137: dt=129.472000, rms=0.702 (0.083%), neg=0, invalid=762 0138: dt=129.472000, rms=0.702 (0.079%), neg=0, invalid=762 0139: dt=129.472000, rms=0.701 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=762 0140: dt=129.472000, rms=0.701 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=762 0141: dt=129.472000, rms=0.701 (0.059%), neg=0, invalid=762 0142: dt=129.472000, rms=0.700 (0.061%), neg=0, invalid=762 0143: dt=129.472000, rms=0.700 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=762 0144: dt=129.472000, rms=0.699 (0.054%), neg=0, invalid=762 0145: dt=129.472000, rms=0.699 (0.053%), neg=0, invalid=762 0146: dt=129.472000, rms=0.699 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=762 0147: dt=129.472000, rms=0.698 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=762 0148: dt=129.472000, rms=0.698 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=762 0149: dt=129.472000, rms=0.698 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=762 0150: dt=129.472000, rms=0.698 (0.038%), neg=0, invalid=762 0151: dt=129.472000, rms=0.697 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=762 0152: dt=129.472000, rms=0.697 (0.039%), neg=0, invalid=762 0153: dt=129.472000, rms=0.697 (0.021%), neg=0, invalid=762 0154: dt=129.472000, rms=0.697 (0.026%), neg=0, invalid=762 0155: dt=129.472000, rms=0.697 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=762 0156: dt=129.472000, rms=0.696 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=762 0157: dt=129.472000, rms=0.696 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=762 0158: dt=129.472000, rms=0.696 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=762 0159: dt=129.472000, rms=0.696 (0.027%), neg=0, invalid=762 0160: dt=129.472000, rms=0.696 (0.026%), neg=0, invalid=762 0161: dt=129.472000, rms=0.695 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0162: dt=129.472000, rms=0.695 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=762 0163: dt=129.472000, rms=0.695 (0.019%), neg=0, invalid=762 0164: dt=129.472000, rms=0.695 (0.029%), neg=0, invalid=762 0165: dt=129.472000, rms=0.695 (0.027%), neg=0, invalid=762 0166: dt=129.472000, rms=0.694 (0.029%), neg=0, invalid=762 0167: dt=129.472000, rms=0.694 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0168: dt=129.472000, rms=0.694 (0.022%), neg=0, invalid=762 0169: dt=1775.616000, rms=0.694 (0.015%), neg=0, invalid=762 0170: dt=1775.616000, rms=0.694 (-0.808%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.695, neg=0, invalid=762 0171: dt=129.472000, rms=0.694 (0.097%), neg=0, invalid=762 0172: dt=369.920000, rms=0.694 (0.021%), neg=0, invalid=762 0173: dt=369.920000, rms=0.693 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=762 0174: dt=369.920000, rms=0.693 (0.029%), neg=0, invalid=762 0175: dt=369.920000, rms=0.693 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 0176: dt=369.920000, rms=0.693 (0.022%), neg=0, invalid=762 0177: dt=369.920000, rms=0.693 (0.045%), neg=0, invalid=762 0178: dt=369.920000, rms=0.692 (0.039%), neg=0, invalid=762 0179: dt=369.920000, rms=0.692 (0.009%), neg=0, invalid=762 0180: dt=369.920000, rms=0.692 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=762 0181: dt=369.920000, rms=0.692 (0.053%), neg=0, invalid=762 0182: dt=369.920000, rms=0.691 (0.023%), neg=0, invalid=762 0183: dt=369.920000, rms=0.691 (0.010%), neg=0, invalid=762 0184: dt=1775.616000, rms=0.691 (0.075%), neg=0, invalid=762 0185: dt=55.488000, rms=0.691 (0.009%), neg=0, invalid=762 0186: dt=55.488000, rms=0.691 (-0.003%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.031 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.695, neg=0, invalid=762 0187: dt=145.152000, rms=0.690 (0.677%), neg=0, invalid=762 0188: dt=580.608000, rms=0.684 (0.957%), neg=0, invalid=762 0189: dt=103.680000, rms=0.679 (0.714%), neg=0, invalid=762 0190: dt=145.152000, rms=0.676 (0.416%), neg=0, invalid=762 0191: dt=103.680000, rms=0.675 (0.189%), neg=0, invalid=762 0192: dt=145.152000, rms=0.673 (0.294%), neg=0, invalid=762 0193: dt=103.680000, rms=0.672 (0.142%), neg=0, invalid=762 0194: dt=145.152000, rms=0.670 (0.258%), neg=0, invalid=762 0195: dt=103.680000, rms=0.669 (0.114%), neg=0, invalid=762 0196: dt=145.152000, rms=0.668 (0.242%), neg=0, invalid=762 0197: dt=103.680000, rms=0.667 (0.094%), neg=0, invalid=762 0198: dt=145.152000, rms=0.666 (0.218%), neg=0, invalid=762 0199: dt=103.680000, rms=0.665 (0.114%), neg=0, invalid=762 0200: dt=145.152000, rms=0.664 (0.200%), neg=0, invalid=762 0201: dt=82.944000, rms=0.663 (0.097%), neg=0, invalid=762 0202: dt=497.664000, rms=0.661 (0.343%), neg=0, invalid=762 0203: dt=36.288000, rms=0.659 (0.238%), neg=0, invalid=762 0204: dt=62.208000, rms=0.658 (0.084%), neg=0, invalid=762 0205: dt=2322.432000, rms=0.647 (1.727%), neg=0, invalid=762 0206: dt=36.288000, rms=0.647 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=762 0207: dt=82.944000, rms=0.646 (0.050%), neg=0, invalid=762 0208: dt=82.944000, rms=0.646 (0.059%), neg=0, invalid=762 0209: dt=82.944000, rms=0.646 (0.084%), neg=0, invalid=762 0210: dt=82.944000, rms=0.645 (0.096%), neg=0, invalid=762 0211: dt=82.944000, rms=0.644 (0.109%), neg=0, invalid=762 0212: dt=82.944000, rms=0.643 (0.137%), neg=0, invalid=762 0213: dt=82.944000, rms=0.642 (0.156%), neg=0, invalid=762 0214: dt=82.944000, rms=0.641 (0.172%), neg=0, invalid=762 0215: dt=82.944000, rms=0.640 (0.173%), neg=0, invalid=762 0216: dt=82.944000, rms=0.639 (0.173%), neg=0, invalid=762 0217: dt=82.944000, rms=0.638 (0.172%), neg=0, invalid=762 0218: dt=82.944000, rms=0.637 (0.174%), neg=0, invalid=762 0219: dt=82.944000, rms=0.636 (0.183%), neg=0, invalid=762 0220: dt=82.944000, rms=0.634 (0.188%), neg=0, invalid=762 0221: dt=82.944000, rms=0.633 (0.190%), neg=0, invalid=762 0222: dt=82.944000, rms=0.632 (0.178%), neg=0, invalid=762 0223: dt=82.944000, rms=0.631 (0.157%), neg=0, invalid=762 0224: dt=82.944000, rms=0.630 (0.140%), neg=0, invalid=762 0225: dt=82.944000, rms=0.629 (0.122%), neg=0, invalid=762 0226: dt=82.944000, rms=0.629 (0.121%), neg=0, invalid=762 0227: dt=82.944000, rms=0.628 (0.119%), neg=0, invalid=762 0228: dt=82.944000, rms=0.627 (0.116%), neg=0, invalid=762 0229: dt=82.944000, rms=0.627 (0.106%), neg=0, invalid=762 0230: dt=82.944000, rms=0.626 (0.102%), neg=0, invalid=762 0231: dt=82.944000, rms=0.625 (0.099%), neg=0, invalid=762 0232: dt=82.944000, rms=0.625 (0.091%), neg=0, invalid=762 0233: dt=82.944000, rms=0.624 (0.082%), neg=0, invalid=762 0234: dt=82.944000, rms=0.624 (0.071%), neg=0, invalid=762 0235: dt=82.944000, rms=0.623 (0.066%), neg=0, invalid=762 0236: dt=82.944000, rms=0.623 (0.070%), neg=0, invalid=762 0237: dt=82.944000, rms=0.622 (0.079%), neg=0, invalid=762 0238: dt=82.944000, rms=0.622 (0.075%), neg=0, invalid=762 0239: dt=82.944000, rms=0.621 (0.073%), neg=0, invalid=762 0240: dt=82.944000, rms=0.621 (0.071%), neg=0, invalid=762 0241: dt=82.944000, rms=0.621 (0.065%), neg=0, invalid=762 0242: dt=82.944000, rms=0.620 (0.062%), neg=0, invalid=762 0243: dt=82.944000, rms=0.620 (0.059%), neg=0, invalid=762 0244: dt=82.944000, rms=0.620 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=762 0245: dt=82.944000, rms=0.619 (0.053%), neg=0, invalid=762 0246: dt=82.944000, rms=0.619 (0.048%), neg=0, invalid=762 0247: dt=82.944000, rms=0.619 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=762 0248: dt=82.944000, rms=0.618 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=762 0249: dt=82.944000, rms=0.618 (0.049%), neg=0, invalid=762 0250: dt=82.944000, rms=0.618 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=762 0251: dt=82.944000, rms=0.617 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=762 0252: dt=82.944000, rms=0.617 (0.035%), neg=0, invalid=762 0253: dt=82.944000, rms=0.617 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=762 0254: dt=82.944000, rms=0.617 (0.031%), neg=0, invalid=762 0255: dt=82.944000, rms=0.617 (0.035%), neg=0, invalid=762 0256: dt=82.944000, rms=0.616 (0.034%), neg=0, invalid=762 0257: dt=82.944000, rms=0.616 (0.029%), neg=0, invalid=762 0258: dt=82.944000, rms=0.616 (0.028%), neg=0, invalid=762 0259: dt=82.944000, rms=0.616 (0.031%), neg=0, invalid=762 0260: dt=82.944000, rms=0.616 (0.031%), neg=0, invalid=762 0261: dt=82.944000, rms=0.616 (0.025%), neg=0, invalid=762 0262: dt=82.944000, rms=0.615 (0.027%), neg=0, invalid=762 0263: dt=82.944000, rms=0.615 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=762 0264: dt=82.944000, rms=0.615 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0265: dt=82.944000, rms=0.615 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0266: dt=82.944000, rms=0.615 (0.028%), neg=0, invalid=762 0267: dt=82.944000, rms=0.615 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0268: dt=82.944000, rms=0.614 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0269: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=762 0270: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=762 0271: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0272: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0273: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.012%), neg=0, invalid=762 0274: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.014%), neg=0, invalid=762 0275: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.023%), neg=0, invalid=762 0276: dt=145.152000, rms=0.614 (0.020%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.615, neg=0, invalid=762 0277: dt=124.416000, rms=0.613 (0.293%), neg=0, invalid=762 0278: dt=145.152000, rms=0.612 (0.103%), neg=0, invalid=762 0279: dt=9.072000, rms=0.612 (0.003%), neg=0, invalid=762 0280: dt=9.072000, rms=0.612 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.118 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.635, neg=0, invalid=762 0281: dt=25.600000, rms=0.634 (0.221%), neg=0, invalid=762 0282: dt=38.400000, rms=0.633 (0.101%), neg=0, invalid=762 0283: dt=127.163399, rms=0.631 (0.336%), neg=0, invalid=762 0284: dt=214.325581, rms=0.625 (0.891%), neg=0, invalid=762 0285: dt=32.000000, rms=0.623 (0.321%), neg=0, invalid=762 0286: dt=44.800000, rms=0.621 (0.288%), neg=0, invalid=762 0287: dt=44.800000, rms=0.621 (0.137%), neg=0, invalid=762 0288: dt=100.036923, rms=0.619 (0.263%), neg=0, invalid=762 0289: dt=25.600000, rms=0.618 (0.148%), neg=0, invalid=762 0290: dt=179.200000, rms=0.616 (0.398%), neg=0, invalid=762 0291: dt=32.000000, rms=0.615 (0.093%), neg=0, invalid=762 0292: dt=44.800000, rms=0.614 (0.134%), neg=0, invalid=762 0293: dt=44.800000, rms=0.614 (0.057%), neg=0, invalid=762 0294: dt=44.800000, rms=0.613 (0.103%), neg=0, invalid=762 0295: dt=44.800000, rms=0.613 (0.042%), neg=0, invalid=762 0296: dt=44.800000, rms=0.612 (0.103%), neg=0, invalid=762 0297: dt=44.800000, rms=0.611 (0.131%), neg=0, invalid=762 0298: dt=44.800000, rms=0.611 (0.141%), neg=0, invalid=762 0299: dt=44.800000, rms=0.609 (0.228%), neg=0, invalid=762 0300: dt=44.800000, rms=0.608 (0.250%), neg=0, invalid=762 0301: dt=44.800000, rms=0.606 (0.245%), neg=0, invalid=762 0302: dt=44.800000, rms=0.605 (0.201%), neg=0, invalid=762 0303: dt=44.800000, rms=0.604 (0.223%), neg=0, invalid=762 0304: dt=44.800000, rms=0.602 (0.206%), neg=0, invalid=762 0305: dt=44.800000, rms=0.601 (0.179%), neg=0, invalid=762 0306: dt=44.800000, rms=0.600 (0.166%), neg=0, invalid=762 0307: dt=44.800000, rms=0.599 (0.194%), neg=0, invalid=762 0308: dt=44.800000, rms=0.598 (0.155%), neg=0, invalid=762 0309: dt=44.800000, rms=0.598 (0.119%), neg=0, invalid=762 0310: dt=44.800000, rms=0.597 (0.095%), neg=0, invalid=762 0311: dt=44.800000, rms=0.596 (0.120%), neg=0, invalid=762 0312: dt=44.800000, rms=0.596 (0.088%), neg=0, invalid=762 0313: dt=44.800000, rms=0.595 (0.069%), neg=0, invalid=762 0314: dt=44.800000, rms=0.595 (0.071%), neg=0, invalid=762 0315: dt=44.800000, rms=0.595 (0.059%), neg=0, invalid=762 0316: dt=44.800000, rms=0.594 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=762 0317: dt=44.800000, rms=0.594 (0.039%), neg=0, invalid=762 0318: dt=44.800000, rms=0.594 (0.052%), neg=0, invalid=762 0319: dt=44.800000, rms=0.593 (0.055%), neg=0, invalid=762 0320: dt=44.800000, rms=0.593 (0.045%), neg=0, invalid=762 0321: dt=44.800000, rms=0.593 (0.037%), neg=0, invalid=762 0322: dt=44.800000, rms=0.593 (0.050%), neg=0, invalid=762 0323: dt=44.800000, rms=0.592 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=762 0324: dt=44.800000, rms=0.592 (0.028%), neg=0, invalid=762 0325: dt=44.800000, rms=0.592 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=762 0326: dt=44.800000, rms=0.592 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=762 0327: dt=44.800000, rms=0.592 (0.027%), neg=0, invalid=762 0328: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.026%), neg=0, invalid=762 0329: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 0330: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.029%), neg=0, invalid=762 0331: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.017%), neg=0, invalid=762 0332: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.018%), neg=0, invalid=762 0333: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.028%), neg=0, invalid=762 0334: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.015%), neg=0, invalid=762 0335: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=762 0336: dt=44.800000, rms=0.591 (0.018%), neg=0, invalid=762 0337: dt=0.000000, rms=0.591 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.591, neg=0, invalid=762 0338: dt=38.400000, rms=0.590 (0.219%), neg=0, invalid=762 0339: dt=11.200000, rms=0.590 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=762 0340: dt=11.200000, rms=0.590 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.400 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.632, neg=0, invalid=762 0341: dt=0.000000, rms=0.632 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=762 0342: dt=0.000000, rms=0.632 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0343: dt=0.150000, rms=0.632 (-0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.632, neg=0, invalid=762 0344: dt=0.000000, rms=0.632 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=762 0345: dt=0.000000, rms=0.632 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0346: dt=0.150000, rms=0.632 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 1.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.714, neg=0, invalid=762 0347: dt=2.822835, rms=0.696 (2.444%), neg=0, invalid=762 0348: dt=1.792000, rms=0.694 (0.289%), neg=0, invalid=762 0349: dt=1.280000, rms=0.694 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=762 0350: dt=0.448000, rms=0.694 (0.012%), neg=0, invalid=762 0351: dt=0.448000, rms=0.694 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0352: dt=0.448000, rms=0.694 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.694, neg=0, invalid=762 0353: dt=1.792000, rms=0.692 (0.246%), neg=0, invalid=762 0354: dt=1.792000, rms=0.692 (0.100%), neg=0, invalid=762 0355: dt=1.792000, rms=0.691 (0.062%), neg=0, invalid=762 0356: dt=1.792000, rms=0.691 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=762 0357: dt=1.792000, rms=0.691 (0.015%), neg=0, invalid=762 0358: dt=1.792000, rms=0.691 (-0.045%), neg=0, invalid=762 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.645, neg=0, invalid=762 0359: dt=1.280000, rms=0.606 (6.056%), neg=0, invalid=762 0360: dt=0.000000, rms=0.606 (0.009%), neg=0, invalid=762 0361: dt=0.050000, rms=0.606 (-0.131%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.607, neg=0, invalid=762 0362: dt=0.000000, rms=0.606 (0.078%), neg=0, invalid=762 0363: dt=0.000000, rms=0.606 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0364: dt=0.050000, rms=0.606 (-0.057%), neg=0, invalid=762 label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) ********************* ALLOWING NEGATIVE NODES IN DEFORMATION******************************** **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ enabling zero nodes setting smoothness coefficient to 0.008 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.598, neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0365: dt=92.480000, rms=0.596 (0.265%), neg=0, invalid=762 0366: dt=129.472000, rms=0.596 (0.074%), neg=0, invalid=762 0367: dt=129.472000, rms=0.595 (0.082%), neg=0, invalid=762 0368: dt=129.472000, rms=0.595 (0.071%), neg=0, invalid=762 0369: dt=129.472000, rms=0.595 (0.019%), neg=0, invalid=762 0370: dt=887.808000, rms=0.593 (0.250%), neg=0, invalid=762 0371: dt=73.984000, rms=0.593 (0.017%), neg=0, invalid=762 0372: dt=73.984000, rms=0.593 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.594, neg=0, invalid=762 0373: dt=295.936000, rms=0.592 (0.197%), neg=0, invalid=762 0374: dt=110.976000, rms=0.592 (0.034%), neg=0, invalid=762 0375: dt=110.976000, rms=0.592 (0.006%), neg=0, invalid=762 0376: dt=110.976000, rms=0.592 (0.021%), neg=0, invalid=762 0377: dt=110.976000, rms=0.592 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=762 0378: dt=110.976000, rms=0.592 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=762 0379: dt=110.976000, rms=0.591 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=762 0380: dt=110.976000, rms=0.591 (0.021%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.031 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.592, neg=0, invalid=762 0381: dt=109.886792, rms=0.589 (0.520%), neg=0, invalid=762 0382: dt=145.152000, rms=0.586 (0.512%), neg=0, invalid=762 0383: dt=62.208000, rms=0.585 (0.121%), neg=0, invalid=762 0384: dt=62.208000, rms=0.585 (0.105%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0385: dt=62.208000, rms=0.584 (0.177%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0386: dt=62.208000, rms=0.582 (0.204%), neg=0, invalid=762 0387: dt=62.208000, rms=0.581 (0.198%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0388: dt=62.208000, rms=0.580 (0.177%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0389: dt=62.208000, rms=0.579 (0.154%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0390: dt=62.208000, rms=0.578 (0.152%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0391: dt=62.208000, rms=0.578 (0.137%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 8 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0392: dt=62.208000, rms=0.577 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0393: dt=62.208000, rms=0.576 (0.111%), neg=0, invalid=762 0394: dt=62.208000, rms=0.576 (0.106%), neg=0, invalid=762 0395: dt=145.152000, rms=0.575 (0.114%), neg=0, invalid=762 0396: dt=62.208000, rms=0.575 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=762 0397: dt=62.208000, rms=0.574 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=762 0398: dt=62.208000, rms=0.574 (0.061%), neg=0, invalid=762 0399: dt=62.208000, rms=0.574 (0.074%), neg=0, invalid=762 0400: dt=62.208000, rms=0.573 (0.079%), neg=0, invalid=762 0401: dt=62.208000, rms=0.573 (0.090%), neg=0, invalid=762 0402: dt=62.208000, rms=0.572 (0.091%), neg=0, invalid=762 0403: dt=62.208000, rms=0.572 (0.086%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0404: dt=62.208000, rms=0.571 (0.077%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.572, neg=0, invalid=762 0405: dt=145.152000, rms=0.569 (0.501%), neg=0, invalid=762 0406: dt=145.152000, rms=0.568 (0.196%), neg=0, invalid=762 0407: dt=145.152000, rms=0.568 (-0.149%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.118 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.572, neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 8 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0408: dt=69.442177, rms=0.566 (0.908%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 2 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0409: dt=71.466667, rms=0.560 (1.057%), neg=0, invalid=762 0410: dt=25.600000, rms=0.558 (0.418%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 10 after 9 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0411: dt=176.784906, rms=0.554 (0.684%), neg=0, invalid=762 0412: dt=30.790932, rms=0.552 (0.438%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0413: dt=44.800000, rms=0.550 (0.268%), neg=0, invalid=762 0414: dt=25.600000, rms=0.550 (0.095%), neg=0, invalid=762 0415: dt=25.600000, rms=0.549 (0.084%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0416: dt=25.600000, rms=0.549 (0.125%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0417: dt=25.600000, rms=0.548 (0.163%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0418: dt=25.600000, rms=0.547 (0.184%), neg=0, invalid=762 0419: dt=25.600000, rms=0.546 (0.204%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0420: dt=25.600000, rms=0.545 (0.214%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0421: dt=25.600000, rms=0.543 (0.194%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 4 after 3 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0422: dt=25.600000, rms=0.543 (0.177%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0423: dt=25.600000, rms=0.542 (0.154%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0424: dt=25.600000, rms=0.541 (0.145%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0425: dt=25.600000, rms=0.540 (0.140%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0426: dt=25.600000, rms=0.540 (0.116%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0427: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.097%), neg=0, invalid=762 0428: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=762 0429: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.003%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0430: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0431: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.013%), neg=0, invalid=762 0432: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.010%), neg=0, invalid=762 0433: dt=25.600000, rms=0.539 (0.009%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.539, neg=0, invalid=762 0434: dt=70.032787, rms=0.535 (0.769%), neg=0, invalid=762 0435: dt=32.000000, rms=0.534 (0.151%), neg=0, invalid=762 0436: dt=32.000000, rms=0.534 (0.050%), neg=0, invalid=762 0437: dt=32.000000, rms=0.534 (0.037%), neg=0, invalid=762 0438: dt=32.000000, rms=0.534 (-0.011%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.400 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.548, neg=0, invalid=762 0439: dt=1.333333, rms=0.548 (0.084%), neg=0, invalid=762 0440: dt=0.216000, rms=0.548 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 0441: dt=0.216000, rms=0.548 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.548, neg=0, invalid=762 0442: dt=3.456000, rms=0.547 (0.131%), neg=0, invalid=762 0443: dt=1.008000, rms=0.547 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0444: dt=1.008000, rms=0.547 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0445: dt=1.008000, rms=0.547 (-0.012%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 1.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.570, neg=0, invalid=762 0446: dt=0.768000, rms=0.569 (0.175%), neg=0, invalid=762 0447: dt=0.256000, rms=0.569 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=762 0448: dt=0.256000, rms=0.569 (-0.003%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.569, neg=0, invalid=762 0449: dt=1.024000, rms=0.568 (0.197%), neg=0, invalid=762 0450: dt=0.448000, rms=0.568 (0.015%), neg=0, invalid=762 0451: dt=0.448000, rms=0.568 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.544, neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 245 after 14 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0452: dt=2.286203, rms=0.510 (6.176%), neg=0, invalid=762 0453: dt=0.112000, rms=0.510 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=762 0454: dt=0.112000, rms=0.510 (-0.016%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.510, neg=0, invalid=762 0455: dt=0.112000, rms=0.509 (0.179%), neg=0, invalid=762 0456: dt=0.016000, rms=0.509 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 0457: dt=0.016000, rms=0.509 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) ***************** morphing with label term set to 0 ******************************* **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ enabling zero nodes setting smoothness coefficient to 0.008 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.491, neg=0, invalid=762 0458: dt=0.000000, rms=0.491 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.491, neg=0, invalid=762 0459: dt=0.000000, rms=0.491 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.031 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.492, neg=0, invalid=762 0460: dt=9.072000, rms=0.492 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=762 0461: dt=2.268000, rms=0.492 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0462: dt=2.268000, rms=0.492 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.492, neg=0, invalid=762 0463: dt=36.288000, rms=0.492 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=762 0464: dt=62.208000, rms=0.491 (0.025%), neg=0, invalid=762 0465: dt=62.208000, rms=0.491 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=762 0466: dt=62.208000, rms=0.491 (0.046%), neg=0, invalid=762 0467: dt=62.208000, rms=0.491 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=762 0468: dt=62.208000, rms=0.491 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=762 0469: dt=62.208000, rms=0.490 (0.050%), neg=0, invalid=762 0470: dt=62.208000, rms=0.490 (0.056%), neg=0, invalid=762 0471: dt=62.208000, rms=0.490 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=762 0472: dt=62.208000, rms=0.490 (0.055%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.118 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.491, neg=0, invalid=762 0473: dt=11.200000, rms=0.490 (0.158%), neg=0, invalid=762 0474: dt=11.200000, rms=0.489 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=762 0475: dt=11.200000, rms=0.489 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 7 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0476: dt=11.200000, rms=0.489 (-0.043%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.489, neg=0, invalid=762 0477: dt=62.017699, rms=0.487 (0.561%), neg=0, invalid=762 0478: dt=44.800000, rms=0.485 (0.332%), neg=0, invalid=762 0479: dt=32.000000, rms=0.484 (0.121%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 6 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0480: dt=32.000000, rms=0.484 (0.115%), neg=0, invalid=762 0481: dt=32.000000, rms=0.483 (0.166%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 2 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0482: dt=32.000000, rms=0.482 (0.197%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 4 after 7 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0483: dt=32.000000, rms=0.481 (0.176%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0484: dt=32.000000, rms=0.480 (0.211%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0485: dt=32.000000, rms=0.479 (0.179%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 4 after 8 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0486: dt=32.000000, rms=0.479 (0.153%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0487: dt=32.000000, rms=0.478 (0.118%), neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 3 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0488: dt=32.000000, rms=0.478 (0.115%), neg=0, invalid=762 0489: dt=44.800000, rms=0.477 (0.017%), neg=0, invalid=762 0490: dt=44.800000, rms=0.477 (-0.007%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.400 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.484, neg=0, invalid=762 0491: dt=2.666667, rms=0.484 (0.031%), neg=0, invalid=762 0492: dt=0.252000, rms=0.484 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 0493: dt=0.252000, rms=0.484 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.484, neg=0, invalid=762 0494: dt=4.032000, rms=0.483 (0.025%), neg=0, invalid=762 0495: dt=1.008000, rms=0.483 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 0496: dt=1.008000, rms=0.483 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 0497: dt=1.008000, rms=0.483 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=762 setting smoothness coefficient to 1.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.494, neg=0, invalid=762 0498: dt=0.000000, rms=0.494 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.494, neg=0, invalid=762 0499: dt=0.000000, rms=0.494 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=762 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.476, neg=0, invalid=762 iter 0, gcam->neg = 222 after 11 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0500: dt=1.609943, rms=0.462 (2.843%), neg=0, invalid=762 0501: dt=0.028000, rms=0.462 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=762 0502: dt=0.028000, rms=0.462 (-0.003%), neg=0, invalid=762 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.462, neg=0, invalid=762 0503: dt=0.112000, rms=0.462 (0.072%), neg=0, invalid=762 0504: dt=0.028000, rms=0.462 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=762 0505: dt=0.028000, rms=0.462 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=762 0506: dt=0.028000, rms=0.462 (-0.010%), neg=0, invalid=762 writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.m3z... GCAMwrite mri_ca_register took 4 hours, 57 minutes and 11 seconds. mri_ca_register utimesec 20489.883064 mri_ca_register stimesec 13.611930 mri_ca_register ru_maxrss 1801232 mri_ca_register ru_ixrss 0 mri_ca_register ru_idrss 0 mri_ca_register ru_isrss 0 mri_ca_register ru_minflt 5701528 mri_ca_register ru_majflt 0 mri_ca_register ru_nswap 0 mri_ca_register ru_inblock 0 mri_ca_register ru_oublock 63576 mri_ca_register ru_msgsnd 0 mri_ca_register ru_msgrcv 0 mri_ca_register ru_nsignals 0 mri_ca_register ru_nvcsw 19549 mri_ca_register ru_nivcsw 97918 FSRUNTIME@ mri_ca_register 4.9529 hours 4 threads #-------------------------------------- #@# SubCort Seg Thu Jul 13 11:40:10 EDT 2017 mri_ca_label -relabel_unlikely 9 .3 -prior 0.5 -align norm.mgz transforms/talairach.m3z /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects cd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_ca_label -relabel_unlikely 9 .3 -prior 0.5 -align norm.mgz transforms/talairach.m3z /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz == Number of threads available to mri_ca_label for OpenMP = 4 == relabeling unlikely voxels with window_size = 9 and prior threshold 0.30 using Gibbs prior factor = 0.500 renormalizing sequences with structure alignment, equivalent to: -renormalize -renormalize_mean 0.500 -regularize 0.500 reading 1 input volumes reading classifier array from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca reading input volume from norm.mgz average std[0] = 7.3 reading transform from transforms/talairach.m3z setting orig areas to linear transform determinant scaled 20.33 Atlas used for the 3D morph was /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/RB_all_2016-05-10.vc700.gca average std = 7.3 using min determinant for regularization = 5.3 0 singular and 0 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized labeling volume... renormalizing by structure alignment.... renormalizing input #0 gca peak = 0.16259 (20) mri peak = 0.15992 (53) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 2.49 x + 0.0 (22456 voxels, overlap=0.007) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (22456 voxels, peak = 50), gca=30.0 gca peak = 0.17677 (13) mri peak = 0.17260 (53) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 3.72 x + 0.0 (8070 voxels, overlap=0.008) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (8070 voxels, peak = 48), gca=19.5 gca peak = 0.28129 (95) mri peak = 0.14958 (103) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (3189 voxels, overlap=0.273) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (3189 voxels, peak = 101), gca=101.2 gca peak = 0.16930 (96) mri peak = 0.14450 (103) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (2955 voxels, overlap=0.499) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.07 x + 0.0 (2955 voxels, peak = 102), gca=102.2 gca peak = 0.24553 (55) mri peak = 0.06849 (77) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (3787 voxels, overlap=0.025) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (3787 voxels, peak = 76), gca=75.6 gca peak = 0.30264 (59) mri peak = 0.06468 (73) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (3115 voxels, overlap=0.027) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.29 x + 0.0 (3115 voxels, peak = 76), gca=76.4 gca peak = 0.07580 (103) mri peak = 0.16603 (106) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (188881 voxels, overlap=0.545) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (188881 voxels, peak = 105), gca=104.5 gca peak = 0.07714 (104) mri peak = 0.18201 (106) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (186340 voxels, overlap=0.517) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (186340 voxels, peak = 105), gca=104.5 gca peak = 0.09712 (58) mri peak = 0.04816 (90) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.48 x + 0.0 (181424 voxels, overlap=0.000) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.48 x + 0.0 (181424 voxels, peak = 86), gca=85.6 gca peak = 0.11620 (58) mri peak = 0.04383 (84) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.47 x + 0.0 (173691 voxels, overlap=0.000) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.47 x + 0.0 (173691 voxels, peak = 85), gca=85.0 gca peak = 0.30970 (66) mri peak = 0.17887 (50) Right_Caudate: unreasonable value (48.5/50.0), not in range [50, 100] - rejecting gca peak = 0.15280 (69) mri peak = 0.09117 (94) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (5022 voxels, overlap=0.021) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.26 x + 0.0 (5022 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.3 gca peak = 0.13902 (56) mri peak = 0.03516 (77) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (37622 voxels, overlap=0.002) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (37622 voxels, peak = 79), gca=78.7 gca peak = 0.14777 (55) mri peak = 0.04034 (75) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (43933 voxels, overlap=0.002) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (43933 voxels, peak = 76), gca=75.6 gca peak = 0.16765 (84) mri peak = 0.11077 (88) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.04 x + 0.0 (12323 voxels, overlap=0.729) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.04 x + 0.0 (12323 voxels, peak = 88), gca=87.8 gca peak = 0.18739 (84) mri peak = 0.12962 (88) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (11378 voxels, overlap=0.742) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.03 x + 0.0 (11378 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.9 gca peak = 0.29869 (57) mri peak = 0.12389 (81) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (1806 voxels, overlap=0.053) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.40 x + 0.0 (1806 voxels, peak = 80), gca=80.1 gca peak = 0.33601 (57) mri peak = 0.10847 (79) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (1813 voxels, overlap=0.049) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (1813 voxels, peak = 79), gca=78.9 gca peak = 0.11131 (90) mri peak = 0.12619 (106) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.16 x + 0.0 (15413 voxels, overlap=0.007) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.16 x + 0.0 (15413 voxels, peak = 105), gca=104.8 gca peak = 0.11793 (83) mri peak = 0.10682 (103) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.22 x + 0.0 (15364 voxels, overlap=0.008) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.22 x + 0.0 (15364 voxels, peak = 101), gca=100.8 gca peak = 0.08324 (81) mri peak = 0.06642 (92) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.22 x + 0.0 (6695 voxels, overlap=0.013) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.22 x + 0.0 (6695 voxels, peak = 98), gca=98.4 gca peak = 0.10360 (77) mri peak = 0.05625 (97) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (8202 voxels, overlap=0.077) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (8202 voxels, peak = 94), gca=94.3 gca peak = 0.08424 (78) mri peak = 0.09143 (88) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.11 x + 0.0 (36523 voxels, overlap=0.476) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.11 x + 0.0 (36523 voxels, peak = 86), gca=86.2 gca peak = 0.12631 (89) mri peak = 0.09090 (98) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (6664 voxels, overlap=0.323) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (6664 voxels, peak = 100), gca=100.1 gca peak = 0.14500 (87) mri peak = 0.09568 (98) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (6716 voxels, overlap=0.474) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (6716 voxels, peak = 97), gca=97.0 gca peak = 0.14975 (24) mri peak = 0.35811 (51) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 1.90 x + 0.0 (180 voxels, overlap=0.035) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 1.90 x + 0.0 (180 voxels, peak = 46), gca=45.7 gca peak = 0.19357 (14) mri peak = 0.07988 (26) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.66 x + 0.0 (1314 voxels, overlap=0.286) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.66 x + 0.0 (1314 voxels, peak = 23), gca=23.3 gca peak Unknown = 0.94835 ( 0) gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.16825 (27) gca peak Left_Thalamus = 1.00000 (94) gca peak Third_Ventricle = 0.14975 (24) gca peak Fourth_Ventricle = 0.19357 (14) gca peak CSF = 0.23379 (36) gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.70037 (62) gca peak Left_undetermined = 1.00000 (26) gca peak Left_vessel = 0.75997 (52) gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.12089 (35) gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.24655 (23) gca peak Right_Caudate = 0.30970 (66) gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.45042 (65) gca peak Right_vessel = 0.82168 (52) gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.14516 (37) gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.65475 (32) gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.07854 (76) gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.08491 (43) gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.71127 (75) not using caudate to estimate GM means setting label Right_Caudate based on Left_Caudate = 1.26 x + 0: 87 estimating mean gm scale to be 1.40 x + 0.0 estimating mean wm scale to be 1.01 x + 0.0 estimating mean csf scale to be 1.50 x + 0.0 Left_Putamen too bright - rescaling by 0.956 (from 1.215) to 94.1 (was 98.4) Left_Pallidum too bright - rescaling by 0.992 (from 1.065) to 101.4 (was 102.2) Right_Putamen too bright - rescaling by 0.997 (from 1.225) to 94.1 (was 94.3) saving intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt renormalizing by structure alignment.... renormalizing input #0 gca peak = 0.12544 (31) mri peak = 0.15992 (53) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.68 x + 0.0 (22456 voxels, overlap=0.040) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (22456 voxels, peak = 52), gca=46.5 gca peak = 0.13981 (19) mri peak = 0.17260 (53) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 2.47 x + 0.0 (8070 voxels, overlap=0.015) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.50 x + 0.0 (8070 voxels, peak = 47), gca=28.5 gca peak = 0.25618 (102) mri peak = 0.14958 (103) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (3189 voxels, overlap=0.999) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (3189 voxels, peak = 102), gca=102.0 gca peak = 0.17041 (102) mri peak = 0.14450 (103) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2955 voxels, overlap=0.995) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2955 voxels, peak = 103), gca=102.5 gca peak = 0.20277 (76) mri peak = 0.06849 (77) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 0.96 x + 0.0 (3787 voxels, overlap=1.003) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 0.96 x + 0.0 (3787 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.3 gca peak = 0.24997 (73) mri peak = 0.06468 (73) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (3115 voxels, overlap=1.006) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (3115 voxels, peak = 71), gca=71.2 gca peak = 0.07736 (104) mri peak = 0.16603 (106) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (188881 voxels, overlap=0.598) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (188881 voxels, peak = 104), gca=104.0 gca peak = 0.07923 (105) mri peak = 0.18201 (106) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (186340 voxels, overlap=0.534) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (186340 voxels, peak = 105), gca=105.0 gca peak = 0.06530 (84) mri peak = 0.04816 (90) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (181424 voxels, overlap=0.882) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (181424 voxels, peak = 84), gca=84.4 gca peak = 0.08255 (85) mri peak = 0.04383 (84) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (173691 voxels, overlap=0.955) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (173691 voxels, peak = 85), gca=85.0 gca peak = 0.21462 (83) mri peak = 0.17887 (50) Right_Caudate: unreasonable value (48.6/50.0), not in range [50, 100] - rejecting gca peak = 0.14924 (98) mri peak = 0.09117 (94) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (5022 voxels, overlap=0.934) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.01 x + 0.0 (5022 voxels, peak = 99), gca=99.5 gca peak = 0.10412 (79) mri peak = 0.03516 (77) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (37622 voxels, overlap=0.945) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (37622 voxels, peak = 78), gca=77.8 gca peak = 0.11459 (75) mri peak = 0.04034 (75) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (43933 voxels, overlap=0.992) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (43933 voxels, peak = 74), gca=73.9 gca peak = 0.15219 (88) mri peak = 0.11077 (88) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (12323 voxels, overlap=0.931) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (12323 voxels, peak = 88), gca=87.6 gca peak = 0.18135 (87) mri peak = 0.12962 (88) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (11378 voxels, overlap=0.896) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (11378 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.6 gca peak = 0.29273 (80) mri peak = 0.12389 (81) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1806 voxels, overlap=0.999) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1806 voxels, peak = 80), gca=80.0 gca peak = 0.30699 (79) mri peak = 0.10847 (79) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (1813 voxels, overlap=1.004) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (1813 voxels, peak = 78), gca=77.8 gca peak = 0.11024 (103) mri peak = 0.12619 (106) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (15413 voxels, overlap=0.740) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (15413 voxels, peak = 103), gca=103.0 gca peak = 0.08806 (101) mri peak = 0.10682 (103) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (15364 voxels, overlap=0.765) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (15364 voxels, peak = 102), gca=101.5 gca peak = 0.07840 (94) mri peak = 0.06642 (92) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (6695 voxels, overlap=0.730) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (6695 voxels, peak = 99), gca=99.2 gca peak = 0.08078 (92) mri peak = 0.05625 (97) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (8202 voxels, overlap=0.963) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (8202 voxels, peak = 92), gca=92.5 gca peak = 0.07063 (89) mri peak = 0.09143 (88) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (36523 voxels, overlap=0.804) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (36523 voxels, peak = 89), gca=88.6 gca peak = 0.10034 (95) mri peak = 0.09090 (98) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (6664 voxels, overlap=0.803) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 0.99 x + 0.0 (6664 voxels, peak = 94), gca=93.6 gca peak = 0.14577 (95) mri peak = 0.09568 (98) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (6716 voxels, overlap=0.867) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (6716 voxels, peak = 95), gca=95.0 gca peak = 0.12656 (38) mri peak = 0.35811 (51) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (180 voxels, overlap=0.035) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (180 voxels, peak = 50), gca=49.6 gca peak = 0.16542 (24) mri peak = 0.07988 (26) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (1314 voxels, overlap=0.854) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.12 x + 0.0 (1314 voxels, peak = 27), gca=26.8 gca peak Unknown = 0.94835 ( 0) gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.17746 (35) gca peak Left_Thalamus = 0.72551 (105) gca peak CSF = 0.15446 (55) gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.57596 (79) gca peak Left_undetermined = 0.95280 (34) gca peak Left_vessel = 0.75997 (52) gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.12303 (35) gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.18665 (32) gca peak Right_Caudate = 0.21462 (83) gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.32601 (83) gca peak Right_vessel = 0.82168 (52) gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.14504 (37) gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.51780 (46) gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.07889 (77) gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.12165 (55) gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.49822 (75) not using caudate to estimate GM means setting label Right_Caudate based on Left_Caudate = 1.01 x + 0: 99 estimating mean gm scale to be 0.99 x + 0.0 estimating mean wm scale to be 1.00 x + 0.0 estimating mean csf scale to be 1.36 x + 0.0 Left_Putamen too bright - rescaling by 0.948 (from 1.055) to 94.0 (was 99.2) Left_Pallidum too bright - rescaling by 0.989 (from 1.005) to 101.4 (was 102.5) Right_Pallidum too bright - rescaling by 0.994 (from 1.000) to 101.4 (was 102.0) saving intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt saving sequentially combined intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt 251254 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling 1230 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling 43 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling 0 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling 377147 gm and wm labels changed (%29 to gray, %71 to white out of all changed labels) 1200 hippocampal voxels changed. 4 amygdala voxels changed. pass 1: 230650 changed. image ll: -2.372, PF=0.500 pass 2: 60989 changed. image ll: -2.369, PF=0.500 pass 3: 25282 changed. pass 4: 12684 changed. pass 5: 6971 changed. pass 6: 4115 changed. 349351 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling 2127 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling 137 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling 3 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling 0 voxels changed in iteration 4 of unlikely voxel relabeling 18289 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling 337 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling 50 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling 1 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling 1 voxels changed in iteration 4 of unlikely voxel relabeling 17459 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling 218 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling 64 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling 6 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling 0 voxels changed in iteration 4 of unlikely voxel relabeling 14431 voxels changed in iteration 0 of unlikely voxel relabeling 80 voxels changed in iteration 1 of unlikely voxel relabeling 3 voxels changed in iteration 2 of unlikely voxel relabeling 2 voxels changed in iteration 3 of unlikely voxel relabeling 2 voxels changed in iteration 4 of unlikely voxel relabeling !!!!!!!!! ventrice segment 6 with volume 25754 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! ventrice segment 0 with volume 1924 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! ventrice segment 0 with volume 13674 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! ventrice segment 7 with volume 137 above threshold 100 - not erasing !!!!!!!!!! MRItoUCHAR: min=0, max=85 MRItoUCHAR: converting to UCHAR writing labeled volume to aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz mri_ca_label utimesec 15445.821878 mri_ca_label stimesec 3.153520 mri_ca_label ru_maxrss 3623716 mri_ca_label ru_ixrss 0 mri_ca_label ru_idrss 0 mri_ca_label ru_isrss 0 mri_ca_label ru_minflt 962869 mri_ca_label ru_majflt 0 mri_ca_label ru_nswap 0 mri_ca_label ru_inblock 0 mri_ca_label ru_oublock 1048 mri_ca_label ru_msgsnd 0 mri_ca_label ru_msgrcv 0 mri_ca_label ru_nsignals 0 mri_ca_label ru_nvcsw 976 mri_ca_label ru_nivcsw 18530 auto-labeling took 255 minutes and 4 seconds. mri_cc -aseg aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz -o aseg.auto.mgz -lta /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/cc_up.lta nmr01106 will read input aseg from aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz writing aseg with cc labels to aseg.auto.mgz will write lta as /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/cc_up.lta reading aseg from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz reading norm from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/norm.mgz 257056 voxels in left wm, 271910 in right wm, xrange [154, 181] searching rotation angles z=[-4 10], y=[-1 13] searching scale 1 Z rot -4.3 searching scale 1 Z rot -4.1 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.8 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.6 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.3 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.1 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.8 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.6 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.3 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.1 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.8 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.6 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.3 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.1 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.8 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.6 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.3 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.1 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 4.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 4.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 4.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 4.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 5.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 5.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 5.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 5.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 6.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 6.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 6.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 6.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 7.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 7.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 7.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 7.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 8.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 8.4 searching scale 1 Z rot 8.7 searching scale 1 Z rot 8.9 searching scale 1 Z rot 9.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 9.4 global minimum found at slice 167.4, rotations (5.70, 2.69) final transformation (x=167.4, yr=5.702, zr=2.691): 0.99395 -0.04695 0.09925 -48.17236; 0.04672 0.99890 0.00466 10.59894; -0.09936 0.00000 0.99505 -4.62386; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; updating x range to be [122, 130] in xformed coordinates best xformed slice 128 cc center is found at 128 109 150 eigenvectors: 0.00037 0.00147 1.00000; -0.10690 -0.99427 0.00150; 0.99427 -0.10690 -0.00021; writing aseg with callosum to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/aseg.auto.mgz... corpus callosum segmentation took 7.9 minutes #-------------------------------------- #@# Merge ASeg Thu Jul 13 16:03:08 EDT 2017 cp aseg.auto.mgz aseg.presurf.mgz #-------------------------------------------- #@# Intensity Normalization2 Thu Jul 13 16:03:08 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_normalize -mprage -noconform -aseg aseg.presurf.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz norm.mgz brain.mgz assuming input volume is MGH (Van der Kouwe) MP-RAGE not interpolating and embedding volume to be 256^3... using segmentation for initial intensity normalization using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... reading from norm.mgz... Reading aseg aseg.presurf.mgz normalizing image... processing with aseg removing outliers in the aseg WM... 2290 control points removed Building bias image building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 0... Smoothing with sigma 8 Applying bias correction building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8... Iterating 2 times --------------------------------- 3d normalization pass 1 of 2 white matter peak found at 110 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 60 (60) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8... --------------------------------- 3d normalization pass 2 of 2 white matter peak found at 110 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 61 (61) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 8... Done iterating --------------------------------- writing output to brain.mgz 3D bias adjustment took 11 minutes and 26 seconds. #-------------------------------------------- #@# Mask BFS Thu Jul 13 16:14:40 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_mask -T 5 brain.mgz brainmask.mgz brain.finalsurfs.mgz threshold mask volume at 5 DoAbs = 0 Found 4790856 voxels in mask (pct= 11.98) Writing masked volume to brain.finalsurfs.mgz...done. #-------------------------------------------- #@# WM Segmentation Thu Jul 13 16:14:45 EDT 2017 mri_segment -mprage brain.mgz wm.seg.mgz doing initial intensity segmentation... using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels... computing class statistics for intensity windows... WM (104.0): 104.5 +- 6.1 [79.0 --> 125.0] GM (73.0) : 71.5 +- 13.6 [30.0 --> 95.0] setting bottom of white matter range to 85.1 setting top of gray matter range to 98.6 doing initial intensity segmentation... using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels... using local geometry to label remaining ambiguous voxels... reclassifying voxels using Gaussian border classifier... removing voxels with positive offset direction... smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 removing 1-dimensional structures... thickening thin strands.... 20 segments, 6598 filled 3403 bright non-wm voxels segmented. 12338 diagonally connected voxels added... white matter segmentation took 5.6 minutes writing output to wm.seg.mgz... assuming input volume is MGH (Van der Kouwe) MP-RAGE mri_edit_wm_with_aseg -keep-in wm.seg.mgz brain.mgz aseg.presurf.mgz wm.asegedit.mgz preserving editing changes in input volume... auto filling took 1.74 minutes reading wm segmentation from wm.seg.mgz... 286 voxels added to wm to prevent paths from MTL structures to cortex 11242 additional wm voxels added 0 additional wm voxels added SEG EDIT: 178165 voxels turned on, 142022 voxels turned off. propagating editing to output volume from wm.seg.mgz 115,126,128 old 0 new 0 115,126,128 old 0 new 0 writing edited volume to wm.asegedit.mgz.... mri_pretess wm.asegedit.mgz wm norm.mgz wm.mgz Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (xy+): 73 found - 73 modified | TOTAL: 73 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 73 modified | TOTAL: 73 pass 1 (xy-): 66 found - 66 modified | TOTAL: 139 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 66 modified | TOTAL: 139 pass 1 (yz+): 82 found - 82 modified | TOTAL: 221 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 82 modified | TOTAL: 221 pass 1 (yz-): 73 found - 73 modified | TOTAL: 294 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 73 modified | TOTAL: 294 pass 1 (xz+): 73 found - 73 modified | TOTAL: 367 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 73 modified | TOTAL: 367 pass 1 (xz-): 65 found - 65 modified | TOTAL: 432 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 65 modified | TOTAL: 432 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (+++): 93 found - 93 modified | TOTAL: 93 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 93 modified | TOTAL: 93 pass 1 (+++): 115 found - 115 modified | TOTAL: 208 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 115 modified | TOTAL: 208 pass 1 (+++): 126 found - 126 modified | TOTAL: 334 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 126 modified | TOTAL: 334 pass 1 (+++): 102 found - 102 modified | TOTAL: 436 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 102 modified | TOTAL: 436 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (++): 249 found - 249 modified | TOTAL: 249 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 249 modified | TOTAL: 249 pass 1 (+-): 249 found - 249 modified | TOTAL: 498 pass 2 (+-): 2 found - 251 modified | TOTAL: 500 pass 3 (+-): 0 found - 251 modified | TOTAL: 500 pass 1 (--): 217 found - 217 modified | TOTAL: 717 pass 2 (--): 1 found - 218 modified | TOTAL: 718 pass 3 (--): 0 found - 218 modified | TOTAL: 718 pass 1 (-+): 201 found - 201 modified | TOTAL: 919 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 201 modified | TOTAL: 919 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (xy+): 20 found - 20 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 20 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 1 (xy-): 27 found - 27 modified | TOTAL: 47 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 27 modified | TOTAL: 47 pass 1 (yz+): 21 found - 21 modified | TOTAL: 68 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 21 modified | TOTAL: 68 pass 1 (yz-): 29 found - 29 modified | TOTAL: 97 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 29 modified | TOTAL: 97 pass 1 (xz+): 32 found - 32 modified | TOTAL: 129 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 32 modified | TOTAL: 129 pass 1 (xz-): 36 found - 36 modified | TOTAL: 165 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 36 modified | TOTAL: 165 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (+++): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (+++): 6 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 7 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 7 pass 1 (+++): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 9 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 9 pass 1 (+++): 5 found - 5 modified | TOTAL: 14 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 5 modified | TOTAL: 14 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (++): 14 found - 14 modified | TOTAL: 14 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 14 modified | TOTAL: 14 pass 1 (+-): 12 found - 12 modified | TOTAL: 26 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 12 modified | TOTAL: 26 pass 1 (--): 11 found - 11 modified | TOTAL: 37 pass 2 (--): 0 found - 11 modified | TOTAL: 37 pass 1 (-+): 8 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 45 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 45 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (xy+): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (xy-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 1 (yz+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 1 (xz+): 5 found - 5 modified | TOTAL: 9 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 5 modified | TOTAL: 9 pass 1 (xz-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 10 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 10 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (-+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 3 Iteration Number : 4 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 4 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 4 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Total Number of Modified Voxels = 2024 (out of 1903593: 0.106325) binarizing input wm segmentation... Ambiguous edge configurations... mri_pretess done #-------------------------------------------- #@# Fill Thu Jul 13 16:22:18 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri mri_fill -a ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log -xform transforms/talairach.lta -segmentation aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz wm.mgz filled.mgz logging cutting plane coordinates to ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log... INFO: Using transforms/talairach.lta and its offset for Talairach volume ... using segmentation aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz... reading input volume...done. searching for cutting planes...voxel to talairach voxel transform 1.07760 -0.02108 0.08163 -22.73207; -0.00492 0.97638 0.29021 -9.70679; -0.12381 -0.24965 0.80748 82.46566; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; voxel to talairach voxel transform 1.07760 -0.02108 0.08163 -22.73207; -0.00492 0.97638 0.29021 -9.70679; -0.12381 -0.24965 0.80748 82.46566; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; reading segmented volume aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz... Looking for area (min, max) = (624, 2499) area[0] = 4997 (min = 624, max = 2499), aspect = 1.30 (min = 0.10, max = 0.75) need search nearby using seed (170, 185, 145), TAL = (0.7, -19.5, -10.5) talairach voxel to voxel transform 0.91746 -0.00358 -0.09146 28.36372; -0.03406 0.93813 -0.33371 35.85182; 0.13014 0.28949 1.12122 -86.69339; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; segmentation indicates cc at (170, 185, 145) --> (0.7, -19.5, -10.5) done. writing output to filled.mgz... filling took 2.4 minutes badRH = 472/900124, badLH=17507/952906 Please check filled volume. Cerebellum may be included. talairach cc position changed to (0.75, -19.46, -10.48) Erasing brainstem...done. seed_search_size = 13, min_neighbors = 5 search rh wm seed point around talairach space:(18.75, -19.46, -10.48) SRC: (148.35, 156.05, 148.43) search lh wm seed point around talairach space (-17.25, -19.46, -10.48), SRC: (192.47, 154.41, 154.69) compute mri_fill using aseg Erasing Brain Stem and Cerebellum ... Define left and right masks using aseg: Building Voronoi diagram ... Using the Voronoi diagram to separate WM into two hemispheres ... Find the largest connected component for each hemisphere ... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Tessellate lh Thu Jul 13 16:24:45 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mri_pretess ../mri/filled.mgz 255 ../mri/norm.mgz ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (xy+): 17 found - 17 modified | TOTAL: 17 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 17 modified | TOTAL: 17 pass 1 (xy-): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 19 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 19 pass 1 (yz+): 9 found - 9 modified | TOTAL: 28 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 9 modified | TOTAL: 28 pass 1 (yz-): 6 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 34 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 34 pass 1 (xz+): 6 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 40 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 40 pass 1 (xz-): 13 found - 13 modified | TOTAL: 53 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 13 modified | TOTAL: 53 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (++): 4 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 1 (+-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 1 (--): 7 found - 7 modified | TOTAL: 12 pass 2 (--): 0 found - 7 modified | TOTAL: 12 pass 1 (-+): 8 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 20 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (xy+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (yz+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (yz-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 3 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (++): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Total Number of Modified Voxels = 77 (out of 952983: 0.008080) Ambiguous edge configurations... mri_pretess done mri_tessellate ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz 255 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.39 2016/07/20 21:05:04 zkaufman Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ slice 40: 120 vertices, 144 faces slice 50: 5474 vertices, 5792 faces slice 60: 19457 vertices, 20102 faces slice 70: 37684 vertices, 38450 faces slice 80: 57161 vertices, 57953 faces slice 90: 77646 vertices, 78460 faces slice 100: 98409 vertices, 99338 faces slice 110: 119061 vertices, 119919 faces slice 120: 139304 vertices, 140197 faces slice 130: 161284 vertices, 162300 faces slice 140: 180543 vertices, 181562 faces slice 150: 200805 vertices, 201856 faces slice 160: 220164 vertices, 221257 faces slice 170: 240098 vertices, 241293 faces slice 180: 259805 vertices, 261018 faces slice 190: 278764 vertices, 279927 faces slice 200: 296562 vertices, 297838 faces slice 210: 314877 vertices, 316196 faces slice 220: 330285 vertices, 331494 faces slice 230: 343814 vertices, 345054 faces slice 240: 356817 vertices, 358030 faces slice 250: 368068 vertices, 369226 faces slice 260: 378012 vertices, 379158 faces slice 270: 386807 vertices, 387880 faces slice 280: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces slice 290: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces slice 300: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces slice 310: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces slice 320: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces slice 330: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces slice 340: 390678 vertices, 391500 faces using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points... writing ../surf/lh.orig.nofix using vox2ras matrix: -0.74854 0.00000 0.00000 128.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.74854 -128.00000; 0.00000 -0.74854 0.00000 128.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; rm -f ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz mris_extract_main_component ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig.nofix counting number of connected components... 390678 voxel in cpt #1: X=-822 [v=390678,e=1174500,f=783000] located at (-25.023615, -16.260765, 38.817974) For the whole surface: X=-822 [v=390678,e=1174500,f=783000] One single component has been found nothing to do done #-------------------------------------------- #@# Tessellate rh Thu Jul 13 16:25:08 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mri_pretess ../mri/filled.mgz 127 ../mri/norm.mgz ../mri/filled-pretess127.mgz Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (xy+): 11 found - 11 modified | TOTAL: 11 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 11 modified | TOTAL: 11 pass 1 (xy-): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 13 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 13 pass 1 (yz+): 12 found - 12 modified | TOTAL: 25 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 12 modified | TOTAL: 25 pass 1 (yz-): 5 found - 5 modified | TOTAL: 30 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 5 modified | TOTAL: 30 pass 1 (xz+): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 32 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 32 pass 1 (xz-): 8 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 40 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 40 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (+++): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (+++): 4 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 6 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 6 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 6 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (++): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (+-): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 1 (--): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 2 (--): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 1 (-+): 4 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 9 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 9 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Total Number of Modified Voxels = 57 (out of 900181: 0.006332) Ambiguous edge configurations... mri_pretess done mri_tessellate ../mri/filled-pretess127.mgz 127 ../surf/rh.orig.nofix $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.39 2016/07/20 21:05:04 zkaufman Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ slice 40: 1073 vertices, 1223 faces slice 50: 10296 vertices, 10775 faces slice 60: 27138 vertices, 27835 faces slice 70: 47889 vertices, 48718 faces slice 80: 69351 vertices, 70126 faces slice 90: 91232 vertices, 92066 faces slice 100: 113219 vertices, 114093 faces slice 110: 133953 vertices, 134710 faces slice 120: 153979 vertices, 154849 faces slice 130: 174542 vertices, 175395 faces slice 140: 193465 vertices, 194347 faces slice 150: 212494 vertices, 213389 faces slice 160: 230635 vertices, 231498 faces slice 170: 248032 vertices, 248956 faces slice 180: 264557 vertices, 265452 faces slice 190: 280326 vertices, 281213 faces slice 200: 294997 vertices, 295917 faces slice 210: 309500 vertices, 310394 faces slice 220: 321896 vertices, 322751 faces slice 230: 333751 vertices, 334673 faces slice 240: 343953 vertices, 344814 faces slice 250: 354216 vertices, 355106 faces slice 260: 363121 vertices, 363949 faces slice 270: 369458 vertices, 370167 faces slice 280: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces slice 290: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces slice 300: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces slice 310: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces slice 320: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces slice 330: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces slice 340: 371222 vertices, 371772 faces using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points... writing ../surf/rh.orig.nofix using vox2ras matrix: -0.74854 0.00000 0.00000 128.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.74854 -128.00000; 0.00000 -0.74854 0.00000 128.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; rm -f ../mri/filled-pretess127.mgz mris_extract_main_component ../surf/rh.orig.nofix ../surf/rh.orig.nofix counting number of connected components... 371222 voxel in cpt #1: X=-550 [v=371222,e=1115316,f=743544] located at (27.854292, -22.575603, 35.798275) For the whole surface: X=-550 [v=371222,e=1115316,f=743544] One single component has been found nothing to do done #-------------------------------------------- #@# Smooth1 lh Thu Jul 13 16:25:31 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix setting seed for random number generator to 1234 smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations... smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Smooth1 rh Thu Jul 13 16:25:54 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.orig.nofix ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix setting seed for random number generator to 1234 smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations... smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Inflation1 lh Thu Jul 13 16:26:17 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_inflate -no-save-sulc -n 15 ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix niterations = 15 Not saving sulc Reading ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix avg radius = 52.7 mm, total surface area = 117757 mm^2 writing inflated surface to ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix inflation took 3.0 minutes step 000: RMS=0.165 (target=0.015) step 005: RMS=0.131 (target=0.015) step 010: RMS=0.110 (target=0.015) step 015: RMS=0.099 (target=0.015) step 020: RMS=0.091 (target=0.015) step 025: RMS=0.085 (target=0.015) step 030: RMS=0.080 (target=0.015) step 035: RMS=0.077 (target=0.015) step 040: RMS=0.074 (target=0.015) step 045: RMS=0.072 (target=0.015) step 050: RMS=0.070 (target=0.015) step 055: RMS=0.069 (target=0.015) step 060: RMS=0.068 (target=0.015) step 065: RMS=0.067 (target=0.015) step 070: RMS=0.066 (target=0.015) step 075: RMS=0.066 (target=0.015) step 080: RMS=0.066 (target=0.015) step 085: RMS=0.067 (target=0.015) step 090: RMS=0.066 (target=0.015) inflation complete. Not saving sulc mris_inflate utimesec 464.233425 mris_inflate stimesec 2.363640 mris_inflate ru_maxrss 604912 mris_inflate ru_ixrss 0 mris_inflate ru_idrss 0 mris_inflate ru_isrss 0 mris_inflate ru_minflt 87031 mris_inflate ru_majflt 1 mris_inflate ru_nswap 0 mris_inflate ru_inblock 576 mris_inflate ru_oublock 27512 mris_inflate ru_msgsnd 0 mris_inflate ru_msgrcv 0 mris_inflate ru_nsignals 0 mris_inflate ru_nvcsw 140538 mris_inflate ru_nivcsw 3727 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Inflation1 rh Thu Jul 13 16:29:18 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_inflate -no-save-sulc -n 15 ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix niterations = 15 Not saving sulc Reading ../surf/rh.smoothwm.nofix avg radius = 53.4 mm, total surface area = 112921 mm^2 writing inflated surface to ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix inflation took 2.8 minutes step 000: RMS=0.159 (target=0.015) step 005: RMS=0.126 (target=0.015) step 010: RMS=0.105 (target=0.015) step 015: RMS=0.095 (target=0.015) step 020: RMS=0.087 (target=0.015) step 025: RMS=0.081 (target=0.015) step 030: RMS=0.076 (target=0.015) step 035: RMS=0.073 (target=0.015) step 040: RMS=0.069 (target=0.015) step 045: RMS=0.067 (target=0.015) step 050: RMS=0.066 (target=0.015) step 055: RMS=0.064 (target=0.015) step 060: RMS=0.064 (target=0.015) step 065: RMS=0.063 (target=0.015) step 070: RMS=0.062 (target=0.015) step 075: RMS=0.062 (target=0.015) step 080: RMS=0.062 (target=0.015) step 085: RMS=0.063 (target=0.015) step 090: RMS=0.062 (target=0.015) inflation complete. Not saving sulc mris_inflate utimesec 447.288001 mris_inflate stimesec 2.450627 mris_inflate ru_maxrss 574168 mris_inflate ru_ixrss 0 mris_inflate ru_idrss 0 mris_inflate ru_isrss 0 mris_inflate ru_minflt 82407 mris_inflate ru_majflt 0 mris_inflate ru_nswap 0 mris_inflate ru_inblock 0 mris_inflate ru_oublock 26136 mris_inflate ru_msgsnd 0 mris_inflate ru_msgrcv 0 mris_inflate ru_nsignals 0 mris_inflate ru_nvcsw 144765 mris_inflate ru_nivcsw 3694 #-------------------------------------------- #@# QSphere lh Thu Jul 13 16:32:09 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_sphere -q -p 6 -a 128 -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix doing quick spherical unfolding. limitting unfolding to 6 passes using n_averages = 128 setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.62 2017/02/07 19:04:37 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading original vertex positions... unfolding cortex into spherical form... surface projected - minimizing metric distortion... vertex spacing 0.60 +- 0.44 (0.00-->6.55) (max @ vno 261243 --> 261244) face area 0.01 +- 0.02 (-0.10-->0.58) == Number of threads available to mris_sphere for OpenMP = 4 == scaling brain by 0.250... inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00) 000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=176.726, avgs=0 005/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.466, avgs=0 010/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.907, avgs=0 015/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.172, avgs=0 020/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.333, avgs=0 025/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=173.436, avgs=0 030/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=172.505, avgs=0 035/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=171.556, avgs=0 040/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=170.598, avgs=0 045/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.636, avgs=0 050/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=168.683, avgs=0 055/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.733, avgs=0 060/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=166.787, avgs=0 065/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=165.843, avgs=0 070/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=164.909, avgs=0 075/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.979, avgs=0 080/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.055, avgs=0 085/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=162.135, avgs=0 090/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=161.221, avgs=0 095/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.312, avgs=0 100/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.408, avgs=0 105/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.509, avgs=0 110/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.615, avgs=0 115/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=156.726, avgs=0 120/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=155.842, avgs=0 125/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.963, avgs=0 130/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.088, avgs=0 135/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.219, avgs=0 140/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.354, avgs=0 145/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.495, avgs=0 150/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.640, avgs=0 155/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.790, avgs=0 160/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.945, avgs=0 165/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.104, avgs=0 170/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.269, avgs=0 175/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.438, avgs=0 180/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.611, avgs=0 185/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.790, avgs=0 190/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.972, avgs=0 195/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.160, avgs=0 200/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.352, avgs=0 205/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.548, avgs=0 210/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.749, avgs=0 215/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.955, avgs=0 220/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.166, avgs=0 225/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.382, avgs=0 230/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.602, avgs=0 235/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.826, avgs=0 240/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.055, avgs=0 245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.288, avgs=0 250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.526, avgs=0 255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.767, avgs=0 260/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.013, avgs=0 265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.264, avgs=0 270/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.518, avgs=0 275/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.777, avgs=0 280/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.040, avgs=0 285/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.307, avgs=0 290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.579, avgs=0 295/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.855, avgs=0 300/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.136, avgs=0 spherical inflation complete. epoch 1 (K=10.0), pass 1, starting sse = 50940.18 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/13 = 0.00009 epoch 2 (K=40.0), pass 1, starting sse = 10837.06 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/13 = 0.00003 epoch 3 (K=160.0), pass 1, starting sse = 1825.25 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.01/13 = 0.00088 epoch 4 (K=640.0), pass 1, starting sse = 245.06 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.05/14 = 0.00338 final distance error %34.27 writing spherical brain to ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix spherical transformation took 0.26 hours mris_sphere utimesec 2256.498960 mris_sphere stimesec 3.068533 mris_sphere ru_maxrss 603056 mris_sphere ru_ixrss 0 mris_sphere ru_idrss 0 mris_sphere ru_isrss 0 mris_sphere ru_minflt 87081 mris_sphere ru_majflt 0 mris_sphere ru_nswap 0 mris_sphere ru_inblock 0 mris_sphere ru_oublock 27512 mris_sphere ru_msgsnd 0 mris_sphere ru_msgrcv 0 mris_sphere ru_nsignals 0 mris_sphere ru_nvcsw 156040 mris_sphere ru_nivcsw 16572 FSRUNTIME@ mris_sphere 0.2566 hours 1 threads #-------------------------------------------- #@# QSphere rh Thu Jul 13 16:47:33 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_sphere -q -p 6 -a 128 -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix ../surf/rh.qsphere.nofix doing quick spherical unfolding. limitting unfolding to 6 passes using n_averages = 128 setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.62 2017/02/07 19:04:37 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading original vertex positions... unfolding cortex into spherical form... surface projected - minimizing metric distortion... vertex spacing 0.59 +- 0.44 (0.00-->4.63) (max @ vno 229734 --> 231373) face area 0.01 +- 0.02 (-0.09-->0.33) == Number of threads available to mris_sphere for OpenMP = 4 == scaling brain by 0.251... inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00) 000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=176.402, avgs=0 005/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.144, avgs=0 010/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.591, avgs=0 015/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.864, avgs=0 020/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.036, avgs=0 025/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=173.138, avgs=0 030/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=172.208, avgs=0 035/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=171.261, avgs=0 040/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=170.307, avgs=0 045/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.350, avgs=0 050/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=168.394, avgs=0 055/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.441, avgs=0 060/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=166.492, avgs=0 065/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=165.548, avgs=0 070/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=164.609, avgs=0 075/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.675, avgs=0 080/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=162.746, avgs=0 085/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=161.824, avgs=0 090/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.908, avgs=0 095/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.997, avgs=0 100/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.091, avgs=0 105/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.190, avgs=0 110/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.294, avgs=0 115/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=156.403, avgs=0 120/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=155.517, avgs=0 125/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.637, avgs=0 130/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.763, avgs=0 135/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.895, avgs=0 140/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.031, avgs=0 145/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.172, avgs=0 150/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.318, avgs=0 155/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.469, avgs=0 160/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.624, avgs=0 165/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.785, avgs=0 170/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.950, avgs=0 175/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.119, avgs=0 180/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.293, avgs=0 185/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.471, avgs=0 190/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.654, avgs=0 195/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.842, avgs=0 200/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.034, avgs=0 205/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.231, avgs=0 210/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.433, avgs=0 215/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.639, avgs=0 220/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.850, avgs=0 225/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.065, avgs=0 230/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.285, avgs=0 235/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.510, avgs=0 240/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.738, avgs=0 245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.971, avgs=0 250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.209, avgs=0 255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.450, avgs=0 260/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.697, avgs=0 265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.948, avgs=0 270/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.204, avgs=0 275/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.464, avgs=0 280/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.729, avgs=0 285/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.997, avgs=0 290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.270, avgs=0 295/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.547, avgs=0 300/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=126.827, avgs=0 spherical inflation complete. epoch 1 (K=10.0), pass 1, starting sse = 48334.62 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/13 = 0.00013 epoch 2 (K=40.0), pass 1, starting sse = 10249.20 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/13 = 0.00000 epoch 3 (K=160.0), pass 1, starting sse = 1716.19 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.01/13 = 0.00114 epoch 4 (K=640.0), pass 1, starting sse = 223.21 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.06/13 = 0.00487 final distance error %32.94 writing spherical brain to ../surf/rh.qsphere.nofix spherical transformation took 0.24 hours mris_sphere utimesec 2155.593300 mris_sphere stimesec 3.123525 mris_sphere ru_maxrss 572324 mris_sphere ru_ixrss 0 mris_sphere ru_idrss 0 mris_sphere ru_isrss 0 mris_sphere ru_minflt 82452 mris_sphere ru_majflt 0 mris_sphere ru_nswap 0 mris_sphere ru_inblock 0 mris_sphere ru_oublock 26136 mris_sphere ru_msgsnd 0 mris_sphere ru_msgrcv 0 mris_sphere ru_nsignals 0 mris_sphere ru_nvcsw 165429 mris_sphere ru_nivcsw 16227 FSRUNTIME@ mris_sphere 0.2444 hours 1 threads #-------------------------------------------- #@# Fix Topology Copy lh Thu Jul 13 17:02:13 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts cp ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig cp ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix ../surf/lh.inflated #-------------------------------------------- #@# Fix Topology Copy rh Thu Jul 13 17:02:14 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts cp ../surf/rh.orig.nofix ../surf/rh.orig cp ../surf/rh.inflated.nofix ../surf/rh.inflated #@# Fix Topology lh Thu Jul 13 17:02:15 EDT 2017 mris_fix_topology -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_fix_topology.lh.dat -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -ga -seed 1234 nmr01106 lh reading spherical homeomorphism from 'qsphere.nofix' using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 ************************************************************* Topology Correction Parameters retessellation mode: genetic search number of patches/generation : 10 number of generations : 10 surface mri loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 volume mri loglikelihood coefficient : 10.0 normal dot loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 volume resolution : 2 eliminate vertices during search : 1 initial patch selection : 1 select all defect vertices : 0 ordering dependant retessellation: 0 use precomputed edge table : 0 smooth retessellated patch : 2 match retessellated patch : 1 verbose mode : 0 ************************************************************* INFO: assuming .mgz format $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.51 2016/10/27 19:43:58 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ before topology correction, eno=-822 (nv=390678, nf=783000, ne=1174500, g=412) using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface... Correction of the Topology Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 8 iterations marking ambiguous vertices... 110408 ambiguous faces found in tessellation segmenting defects... 238 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions... analyzing neighboring defects... -merging segment 18 into 11 -merging segment 44 into 39 -merging segment 72 into 65 -merging segment 154 into 68 -merging segment 180 into 68 -merging segment 183 into 68 -merging segment 92 into 76 -merging segment 84 into 79 -merging segment 90 into 87 -merging segment 149 into 130 -merging segment 135 into 132 -merging segment 131 into 138 -merging segment 174 into 164 -merging segment 182 into 179 -merging segment 204 into 185 -merging segment 191 into 190 222 defects to be corrected 0 vertices coincident reading input surface /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.qsphere.nofix... reading brain volume from brain... reading wm segmentation from wm... Computing Initial Surface Statistics -face loglikelihood: -9.4364 (-4.7182) -vertex loglikelihood: -6.2930 (-3.1465) -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.4118 (-3.4118) -quad curv loglikelihood: -6.3171 (-3.1585) Total Loglikelihood : -25.4583 CORRECTING DEFECT 0 (vertices=5, convex hull=14, v0=120) After retessellation of defect 0 (v0=120), euler #=-185 (328295,969981,641501) : difference with theory (-219) = -34 CORRECTING DEFECT 1 (vertices=131, convex hull=28, v0=830) After retessellation of defect 1 (v0=830), euler #=-184 (328297,969994,641513) : difference with theory (-218) = -34 CORRECTING DEFECT 2 (vertices=29, convex hull=62, v0=925) After retessellation of defect 2 (v0=925), euler #=-183 (328302,970031,641546) : difference with theory (-217) = -34 CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=4193, convex hull=831, v0=1488) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 3 (v0=1488), euler #=-182 (328803,971943,642958) : difference with theory (-216) = -34 CORRECTING DEFECT 4 (vertices=49, convex hull=28, v0=1664) After retessellation of defect 4 (v0=1664), euler #=-181 (328804,971956,642971) : difference with theory (-215) = -34 CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=4091, convex hull=770, v0=1817) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 5 (v0=1817), euler #=-183 (329124,973327,644020) : difference with theory (-214) = -31 CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=217, convex hull=117, v0=2178) After retessellation of defect 6 (v0=2178), euler #=-182 (329133,973417,644102) : difference with theory (-213) = -31 CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=485, convex hull=211, v0=2686) After retessellation of defect 7 (v0=2686), euler #=-181 (329181,973658,644296) : difference with theory (-212) = -31 CORRECTING DEFECT 8 (vertices=3663, convex hull=794, v0=3310) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 8 (v0=3310), euler #=-180 (329314,974460,644966) : difference with theory (-211) = -31 CORRECTING DEFECT 9 (vertices=141, convex hull=99, v0=8336) After retessellation of defect 9 (v0=8336), euler #=-179 (329334,974567,645054) : difference with theory (-210) = -31 CORRECTING DEFECT 10 (vertices=2850, convex hull=919, v0=9351) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 10 (v0=9351), euler #=-178 (329646,975969,646145) : difference with theory (-209) = -31 CORRECTING DEFECT 11 (vertices=138, convex hull=67, v0=10302) After retessellation of defect 11 (v0=10302), euler #=-176 (329652,976019,646191) : difference with theory (-208) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 12 (vertices=21, convex hull=53, v0=12034) After retessellation of defect 12 (v0=12034), euler #=-175 (329659,976060,646226) : difference with theory (-207) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 13 (vertices=52, convex hull=40, v0=16208) After retessellation of defect 13 (v0=16208), euler #=-174 (329660,976083,646249) : difference with theory (-206) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 14 (vertices=28, convex hull=60, v0=16795) After retessellation of defect 14 (v0=16795), euler #=-173 (329666,976125,646286) : difference with theory (-205) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 15 (vertices=362, convex hull=193, v0=18090) After retessellation of defect 15 (v0=18090), euler #=-172 (329675,976233,646386) : difference with theory (-204) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 16 (vertices=14, convex hull=42, v0=18804) After retessellation of defect 16 (v0=18804), euler #=-171 (329677,976253,646405) : difference with theory (-203) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 17 (vertices=42, convex hull=60, v0=19616) After retessellation of defect 17 (v0=19616), euler #=-170 (329684,976295,646441) : difference with theory (-202) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 18 (vertices=49, convex hull=74, v0=29323) After retessellation of defect 18 (v0=29323), euler #=-169 (329693,976353,646491) : difference with theory (-201) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 19 (vertices=21, convex hull=47, v0=34530) After retessellation of defect 19 (v0=34530), euler #=-168 (329698,976386,646520) : difference with theory (-200) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 20 (vertices=580, convex hull=275, v0=37400) After retessellation of defect 20 (v0=37400), euler #=-167 (329750,976670,646753) : difference with theory (-199) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 21 (vertices=157, convex hull=89, v0=41485) After retessellation of defect 21 (v0=41485), euler #=-166 (329765,976760,646829) : difference with theory (-198) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 22 (vertices=22, convex hull=38, v0=41536) After retessellation of defect 22 (v0=41536), euler #=-165 (329767,976780,646848) : difference with theory (-197) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 23 (vertices=25, convex hull=40, v0=45806) After retessellation of defect 23 (v0=45806), euler #=-164 (329774,976815,646877) : difference with theory (-196) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 24 (vertices=78, convex hull=99, v0=45994) After retessellation of defect 24 (v0=45994), euler #=-163 (329791,976908,646954) : difference with theory (-195) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 25 (vertices=121, convex hull=153, v0=46274) After retessellation of defect 25 (v0=46274), euler #=-162 (329806,977022,647054) : difference with theory (-194) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 26 (vertices=73, convex hull=33, v0=46965) After retessellation of defect 26 (v0=46965), euler #=-161 (329807,977037,647069) : difference with theory (-193) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 27 (vertices=659, convex hull=312, v0=49592) After retessellation of defect 27 (v0=49592), euler #=-160 (329863,977358,647335) : difference with theory (-192) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 28 (vertices=54, convex hull=51, v0=55005) After retessellation of defect 28 (v0=55005), euler #=-159 (329868,977394,647367) : difference with theory (-191) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 29 (vertices=60, convex hull=83, v0=56512) After retessellation of defect 29 (v0=56512), euler #=-158 (329885,977483,647440) : difference with theory (-190) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 30 (vertices=141, convex hull=119, v0=57961) After retessellation of defect 30 (v0=57961), euler #=-157 (329906,977607,647544) : difference with theory (-189) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 31 (vertices=2004, convex hull=168, v0=59170) After retessellation of defect 31 (v0=59170), euler #=-156 (329980,977903,647767) : difference with theory (-188) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 32 (vertices=34, convex hull=62, v0=63800) After retessellation of defect 32 (v0=63800), euler #=-155 (329988,977954,647811) : difference with theory (-187) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 33 (vertices=6, convex hull=12, v0=66947) After retessellation of defect 33 (v0=66947), euler #=-154 (329989,977959,647816) : difference with theory (-186) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 34 (vertices=50, convex hull=69, v0=70348) After retessellation of defect 34 (v0=70348), euler #=-153 (329998,978013,647862) : difference with theory (-185) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 35 (vertices=35, convex hull=62, v0=70644) After retessellation of defect 35 (v0=70644), euler #=-152 (330005,978062,647905) : difference with theory (-184) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 36 (vertices=292, convex hull=375, v0=74498) After retessellation of defect 36 (v0=74498), euler #=-151 (330038,978341,648152) : difference with theory (-183) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 37 (vertices=28, convex hull=55, v0=78368) After retessellation of defect 37 (v0=78368), euler #=-150 (330045,978386,648191) : difference with theory (-182) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 38 (vertices=255, convex hull=187, v0=82261) After retessellation of defect 38 (v0=82261), euler #=-148 (330090,978616,648378) : difference with theory (-181) = -33 CORRECTING DEFECT 39 (vertices=15, convex hull=20, v0=83142) After retessellation of defect 39 (v0=83142), euler #=-147 (330091,978625,648387) : difference with theory (-180) = -33 CORRECTING DEFECT 40 (vertices=70, convex hull=105, v0=83193) After retessellation of defect 40 (v0=83193), euler #=-146 (330105,978708,648457) : difference with theory (-179) = -33 CORRECTING DEFECT 41 (vertices=266, convex hull=221, v0=84795) After retessellation of defect 41 (v0=84795), euler #=-146 (330166,979016,648704) : difference with theory (-178) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 42 (vertices=57, convex hull=70, v0=84998) After retessellation of defect 42 (v0=84998), euler #=-145 (330175,979068,648748) : difference with theory (-177) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 43 (vertices=6, convex hull=16, v0=88043) After retessellation of defect 43 (v0=88043), euler #=-144 (330176,979075,648755) : difference with theory (-176) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 44 (vertices=47, convex hull=69, v0=89096) After retessellation of defect 44 (v0=89096), euler #=-143 (330187,979139,648809) : difference with theory (-175) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 45 (vertices=24, convex hull=45, v0=89500) After retessellation of defect 45 (v0=89500), euler #=-142 (330191,979170,648837) : difference with theory (-174) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 46 (vertices=46, convex hull=62, v0=95700) After retessellation of defect 46 (v0=95700), euler #=-141 (330199,979214,648874) : difference with theory (-173) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 47 (vertices=39, convex hull=72, v0=99283) After retessellation of defect 47 (v0=99283), euler #=-140 (330206,979266,648920) : difference with theory (-172) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 48 (vertices=26, convex hull=61, v0=105266) After retessellation of defect 48 (v0=105266), euler #=-139 (330213,979312,648960) : difference with theory (-171) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 49 (vertices=47, convex hull=55, v0=105456) After retessellation of defect 49 (v0=105456), euler #=-138 (330222,979362,649002) : difference with theory (-170) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 50 (vertices=21, convex hull=51, v0=105948) After retessellation of defect 50 (v0=105948), euler #=-137 (330228,979397,649032) : difference with theory (-169) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 51 (vertices=50, convex hull=60, v0=108570) After retessellation of defect 51 (v0=108570), euler #=-136 (330235,979442,649071) : difference with theory (-168) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 52 (vertices=116, convex hull=92, v0=109199) After retessellation of defect 52 (v0=109199), euler #=-135 (330244,979512,649133) : difference with theory (-167) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 53 (vertices=36, convex hull=70, v0=111609) After retessellation of defect 53 (v0=111609), euler #=-134 (330253,979571,649184) : difference with theory (-166) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 54 (vertices=28, convex hull=47, v0=111719) After retessellation of defect 54 (v0=111719), euler #=-133 (330258,979603,649212) : difference with theory (-165) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 55 (vertices=157, convex hull=155, v0=112386) After retessellation of defect 55 (v0=112386), euler #=-132 (330277,979736,649327) : difference with theory (-164) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 56 (vertices=386, convex hull=277, v0=112636) After retessellation of defect 56 (v0=112636), euler #=-131 (330337,980049,649581) : difference with theory (-163) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 57 (vertices=46, convex hull=48, v0=113676) After retessellation of defect 57 (v0=113676), euler #=-130 (330346,980094,649618) : difference with theory (-162) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 58 (vertices=156, convex hull=185, v0=115970) After retessellation of defect 58 (v0=115970), euler #=-129 (330385,980293,649779) : difference with theory (-161) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 59 (vertices=48, convex hull=83, v0=116098) After retessellation of defect 59 (v0=116098), euler #=-128 (330394,980353,649831) : difference with theory (-160) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 60 (vertices=20, convex hull=60, v0=119493) After retessellation of defect 60 (v0=119493), euler #=-127 (330402,980400,649871) : difference with theory (-159) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 61 (vertices=46, convex hull=67, v0=122018) After retessellation of defect 61 (v0=122018), euler #=-126 (330416,980471,649929) : difference with theory (-158) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 62 (vertices=27, convex hull=26, v0=122268) After retessellation of defect 62 (v0=122268), euler #=-125 (330418,980485,649942) : difference with theory (-157) = -32 CORRECTING DEFECT 63 (vertices=5233, convex hull=1382, v0=122288) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 63 (v0=122288), euler #=-126 (330633,981936,651177) : difference with theory (-156) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 64 (vertices=20, convex hull=31, v0=122733) After retessellation of defect 64 (v0=122733), euler #=-125 (330635,981950,651190) : difference with theory (-155) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 65 (vertices=20, convex hull=48, v0=123413) After retessellation of defect 65 (v0=123413), euler #=-124 (330642,981989,651223) : difference with theory (-154) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 66 (vertices=6077, convex hull=3382, v0=124422) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 66 (v0=124422), euler #=-125 (331436,986151,654590) : difference with theory (-153) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 67 (vertices=291, convex hull=169, v0=128241) After retessellation of defect 67 (v0=128241), euler #=-125 (331474,986354,654755) : difference with theory (-152) = -27 CORRECTING DEFECT 68 (vertices=55, convex hull=91, v0=128332) After retessellation of defect 68 (v0=128332), euler #=-124 (331484,986424,654816) : difference with theory (-151) = -27 CORRECTING DEFECT 69 (vertices=49, convex hull=72, v0=130246) After retessellation of defect 69 (v0=130246), euler #=-123 (331497,986493,654873) : difference with theory (-150) = -27 CORRECTING DEFECT 70 (vertices=47, convex hull=36, v0=132108) After retessellation of defect 70 (v0=132108), euler #=-122 (331499,986511,654890) : difference with theory (-149) = -27 CORRECTING DEFECT 71 (vertices=40, convex hull=44, v0=136341) After retessellation of defect 71 (v0=136341), euler #=-121 (331504,986541,654916) : difference with theory (-148) = -27 CORRECTING DEFECT 72 (vertices=172, convex hull=82, v0=136951) After retessellation of defect 72 (v0=136951), euler #=-120 (331513,986600,654967) : difference with theory (-147) = -27 CORRECTING DEFECT 73 (vertices=391, convex hull=276, v0=137879) After retessellation of defect 73 (v0=137879), euler #=-118 (331567,986912,655227) : difference with theory (-146) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 74 (vertices=40, convex hull=59, v0=137980) After retessellation of defect 74 (v0=137980), euler #=-117 (331576,986962,655269) : difference with theory (-145) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 75 (vertices=44, convex hull=61, v0=146467) After retessellation of defect 75 (v0=146467), euler #=-116 (331585,987015,655314) : difference with theory (-144) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 76 (vertices=69, convex hull=131, v0=147574) After retessellation of defect 76 (v0=147574), euler #=-114 (331598,987112,655400) : difference with theory (-143) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 77 (vertices=6, convex hull=28, v0=149383) After retessellation of defect 77 (v0=149383), euler #=-113 (331598,987120,655409) : difference with theory (-142) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 78 (vertices=30, convex hull=62, v0=150575) After retessellation of defect 78 (v0=150575), euler #=-112 (331611,987184,655461) : difference with theory (-141) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 79 (vertices=5, convex hull=17, v0=151320) After retessellation of defect 79 (v0=151320), euler #=-111 (331611,987187,655465) : difference with theory (-140) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 80 (vertices=78, convex hull=39, v0=152004) After retessellation of defect 80 (v0=152004), euler #=-110 (331613,987210,655487) : difference with theory (-139) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 81 (vertices=65, convex hull=44, v0=153562) After retessellation of defect 81 (v0=153562), euler #=-109 (331620,987246,655517) : difference with theory (-138) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 82 (vertices=84, convex hull=97, v0=155519) After retessellation of defect 82 (v0=155519), euler #=-108 (331629,987316,655579) : difference with theory (-137) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 83 (vertices=198, convex hull=268, v0=157395) After retessellation of defect 83 (v0=157395), euler #=-106 (331671,987577,655800) : difference with theory (-136) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 84 (vertices=6, convex hull=22, v0=158130) After retessellation of defect 84 (v0=158130), euler #=-105 (331671,987582,655806) : difference with theory (-135) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 85 (vertices=341, convex hull=299, v0=159016) After retessellation of defect 85 (v0=159016), euler #=-104 (331730,987909,656075) : difference with theory (-134) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 86 (vertices=217, convex hull=203, v0=161977) After retessellation of defect 86 (v0=161977), euler #=-103 (331763,988106,656240) : difference with theory (-133) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 87 (vertices=9, convex hull=25, v0=162363) After retessellation of defect 87 (v0=162363), euler #=-102 (331764,988118,656252) : difference with theory (-132) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 88 (vertices=8, convex hull=25, v0=162458) After retessellation of defect 88 (v0=162458), euler #=-101 (331764,988125,656260) : difference with theory (-131) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 89 (vertices=709, convex hull=636, v0=164382) After retessellation of defect 89 (v0=164382), euler #=-100 (331928,988955,656927) : difference with theory (-130) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 90 (vertices=486, convex hull=422, v0=165179) After retessellation of defect 90 (v0=165179), euler #=-99 (332041,989501,657361) : difference with theory (-129) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 91 (vertices=12, convex hull=29, v0=166752) After retessellation of defect 91 (v0=166752), euler #=-98 (332044,989517,657375) : difference with theory (-128) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 92 (vertices=9, convex hull=15, v0=172149) After retessellation of defect 92 (v0=172149), euler #=-97 (332046,989526,657383) : difference with theory (-127) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 93 (vertices=66, convex hull=91, v0=173286) After retessellation of defect 93 (v0=173286), euler #=-96 (332055,989592,657441) : difference with theory (-126) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 94 (vertices=59, convex hull=52, v0=180362) After retessellation of defect 94 (v0=180362), euler #=-95 (332061,989631,657475) : difference with theory (-125) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 95 (vertices=79, convex hull=37, v0=183292) After retessellation of defect 95 (v0=183292), euler #=-94 (332064,989650,657492) : difference with theory (-124) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 96 (vertices=70, convex hull=28, v0=183446) After retessellation of defect 96 (v0=183446), euler #=-93 (332067,989669,657509) : difference with theory (-123) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 97 (vertices=27, convex hull=46, v0=187021) After retessellation of defect 97 (v0=187021), euler #=-92 (332076,989714,657546) : difference with theory (-122) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 98 (vertices=42, convex hull=56, v0=187416) After retessellation of defect 98 (v0=187416), euler #=-91 (332084,989764,657589) : difference with theory (-121) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 99 (vertices=79, convex hull=70, v0=187796) After retessellation of defect 99 (v0=187796), euler #=-90 (332092,989812,657630) : difference with theory (-120) = -30 CORRECTING DEFECT 100 (vertices=63, convex hull=84, v0=188755) After retessellation of defect 100 (v0=188755), euler #=-90 (332105,989892,657697) : difference with theory (-119) = -29 CORRECTING DEFECT 101 (vertices=121, convex hull=114, v0=192773) After retessellation of defect 101 (v0=192773), euler #=-90 (332125,990008,657793) : difference with theory (-118) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 102 (vertices=661, convex hull=172, v0=194821) After retessellation of defect 102 (v0=194821), euler #=-89 (332156,990190,657945) : difference with theory (-117) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 103 (vertices=61, convex hull=88, v0=194886) After retessellation of defect 103 (v0=194886), euler #=-88 (332168,990262,658006) : difference with theory (-116) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 104 (vertices=42, convex hull=43, v0=196193) After retessellation of defect 104 (v0=196193), euler #=-87 (332171,990285,658027) : difference with theory (-115) = -28 CORRECTING DEFECT 105 (vertices=429, convex hull=240, v0=197565) After retessellation of defect 105 (v0=197565), euler #=-88 (332240,990632,658304) : difference with theory (-114) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 106 (vertices=32, convex hull=58, v0=197696) After retessellation of defect 106 (v0=197696), euler #=-87 (332247,990674,658340) : difference with theory (-113) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 107 (vertices=49, convex hull=70, v0=203273) After retessellation of defect 107 (v0=203273), euler #=-86 (332258,990735,658391) : difference with theory (-112) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 108 (vertices=83, convex hull=85, v0=204921) After retessellation of defect 108 (v0=204921), euler #=-85 (332275,990820,658460) : difference with theory (-111) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 109 (vertices=50, convex hull=70, v0=207308) After retessellation of defect 109 (v0=207308), euler #=-84 (332286,990880,658510) : difference with theory (-110) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 110 (vertices=25, convex hull=59, v0=210372) After retessellation of defect 110 (v0=210372), euler #=-83 (332293,990923,658547) : difference with theory (-109) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 111 (vertices=26, convex hull=53, v0=215046) After retessellation of defect 111 (v0=215046), euler #=-82 (332300,990967,658585) : difference with theory (-108) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 112 (vertices=6, convex hull=29, v0=215640) After retessellation of defect 112 (v0=215640), euler #=-81 (332301,990980,658598) : difference with theory (-107) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 113 (vertices=34, convex hull=29, v0=215669) After retessellation of defect 113 (v0=215669), euler #=-80 (332303,990997,658614) : difference with theory (-106) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 114 (vertices=337, convex hull=86, v0=215672) After retessellation of defect 114 (v0=215672), euler #=-79 (332329,991119,658711) : difference with theory (-105) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 115 (vertices=224, convex hull=185, v0=216019) After retessellation of defect 115 (v0=216019), euler #=-78 (332357,991291,658856) : difference with theory (-104) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 116 (vertices=6, convex hull=40, v0=216534) After retessellation of defect 116 (v0=216534), euler #=-77 (332358,991306,658871) : difference with theory (-103) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 117 (vertices=29, convex hull=51, v0=216725) After retessellation of defect 117 (v0=216725), euler #=-76 (332365,991350,658909) : difference with theory (-102) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 118 (vertices=125, convex hull=84, v0=217992) After retessellation of defect 118 (v0=217992), euler #=-75 (332378,991432,658979) : difference with theory (-101) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 119 (vertices=21, convex hull=48, v0=220191) After retessellation of defect 119 (v0=220191), euler #=-74 (332384,991464,659006) : difference with theory (-100) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 120 (vertices=19, convex hull=39, v0=220201) After retessellation of defect 120 (v0=220201), euler #=-73 (332390,991497,659034) : difference with theory (-99) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 121 (vertices=22, convex hull=35, v0=221028) After retessellation of defect 121 (v0=221028), euler #=-72 (332392,991513,659049) : difference with theory (-98) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 122 (vertices=71, convex hull=52, v0=223513) After retessellation of defect 122 (v0=223513), euler #=-71 (332396,991546,659079) : difference with theory (-97) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 123 (vertices=10, convex hull=16, v0=228500) After retessellation of defect 123 (v0=228500), euler #=-70 (332397,991554,659087) : difference with theory (-96) = -26 CORRECTING DEFECT 124 (vertices=2676, convex hull=993, v0=229262) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 124 (v0=229262), euler #=-80 (332743,993210,660387) : difference with theory (-95) = -15 CORRECTING DEFECT 125 (vertices=52, convex hull=116, v0=230405) After retessellation of defect 125 (v0=230405), euler #=-78 (332754,993293,660461) : difference with theory (-94) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 126 (vertices=19, convex hull=39, v0=231209) After retessellation of defect 126 (v0=231209), euler #=-77 (332757,993316,660482) : difference with theory (-93) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 127 (vertices=45, convex hull=71, v0=231404) After retessellation of defect 127 (v0=231404), euler #=-76 (332772,993390,660542) : difference with theory (-92) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 128 (vertices=16, convex hull=30, v0=233079) After retessellation of defect 128 (v0=233079), euler #=-75 (332774,993405,660556) : difference with theory (-91) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 129 (vertices=17, convex hull=40, v0=233345) After retessellation of defect 129 (v0=233345), euler #=-74 (332780,993437,660583) : difference with theory (-90) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 130 (vertices=18, convex hull=23, v0=233988) After retessellation of defect 130 (v0=233988), euler #=-72 (332781,993447,660594) : difference with theory (-89) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 131 (vertices=35, convex hull=57, v0=234053) After retessellation of defect 131 (v0=234053), euler #=-71 (332791,993495,660633) : difference with theory (-88) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 132 (vertices=22, convex hull=29, v0=234654) After retessellation of defect 132 (v0=234654), euler #=-70 (332793,993509,660646) : difference with theory (-87) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 133 (vertices=23, convex hull=58, v0=234830) After retessellation of defect 133 (v0=234830), euler #=-69 (332799,993550,660682) : difference with theory (-86) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 134 (vertices=577, convex hull=75, v0=238888) After retessellation of defect 134 (v0=238888), euler #=-68 (332809,993613,660736) : difference with theory (-85) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 135 (vertices=27, convex hull=70, v0=238913) After retessellation of defect 135 (v0=238913), euler #=-67 (332816,993659,660776) : difference with theory (-84) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 136 (vertices=146, convex hull=77, v0=239767) After retessellation of defect 136 (v0=239767), euler #=-66 (332825,993719,660828) : difference with theory (-83) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 137 (vertices=18, convex hull=49, v0=239828) After retessellation of defect 137 (v0=239828), euler #=-65 (332830,993750,660855) : difference with theory (-82) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 138 (vertices=5, convex hull=22, v0=240699) After retessellation of defect 138 (v0=240699), euler #=-64 (332830,993757,660863) : difference with theory (-81) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 139 (vertices=14, convex hull=31, v0=241654) After retessellation of defect 139 (v0=241654), euler #=-63 (332832,993773,660878) : difference with theory (-80) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 140 (vertices=25, convex hull=25, v0=241695) After retessellation of defect 140 (v0=241695), euler #=-62 (332834,993790,660894) : difference with theory (-79) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 141 (vertices=5, convex hull=26, v0=244961) After retessellation of defect 141 (v0=244961), euler #=-61 (332835,993798,660902) : difference with theory (-78) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 142 (vertices=9, convex hull=20, v0=244983) After retessellation of defect 142 (v0=244983), euler #=-60 (332836,993806,660910) : difference with theory (-77) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 143 (vertices=55, convex hull=27, v0=245006) After retessellation of defect 143 (v0=245006), euler #=-59 (332839,993821,660923) : difference with theory (-76) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 144 (vertices=54, convex hull=33, v0=246586) After retessellation of defect 144 (v0=246586), euler #=-58 (332845,993851,660948) : difference with theory (-75) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 145 (vertices=53, convex hull=80, v0=247786) After retessellation of defect 145 (v0=247786), euler #=-57 (332856,993915,661002) : difference with theory (-74) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 146 (vertices=27, convex hull=23, v0=247915) After retessellation of defect 146 (v0=247915), euler #=-56 (332858,993933,661019) : difference with theory (-73) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 147 (vertices=6, convex hull=29, v0=248418) After retessellation of defect 147 (v0=248418), euler #=-55 (332860,993950,661035) : difference with theory (-72) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 148 (vertices=28, convex hull=43, v0=250488) After retessellation of defect 148 (v0=250488), euler #=-54 (332867,993988,661067) : difference with theory (-71) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 149 (vertices=35, convex hull=63, v0=250587) After retessellation of defect 149 (v0=250587), euler #=-53 (332875,994038,661110) : difference with theory (-70) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 150 (vertices=30, convex hull=63, v0=250856) After retessellation of defect 150 (v0=250856), euler #=-52 (332883,994084,661149) : difference with theory (-69) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 151 (vertices=44, convex hull=37, v0=251744) After retessellation of defect 151 (v0=251744), euler #=-51 (332885,994104,661168) : difference with theory (-68) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 152 (vertices=43, convex hull=68, v0=254384) After retessellation of defect 152 (v0=254384), euler #=-50 (332894,994163,661219) : difference with theory (-67) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 153 (vertices=26, convex hull=43, v0=255095) After retessellation of defect 153 (v0=255095), euler #=-49 (332901,994199,661249) : difference with theory (-66) = -17 CORRECTING DEFECT 154 (vertices=285, convex hull=223, v0=259863) After retessellation of defect 154 (v0=259863), euler #=-49 (332911,994350,661390) : difference with theory (-65) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 155 (vertices=22, convex hull=38, v0=261528) After retessellation of defect 155 (v0=261528), euler #=-48 (332913,994371,661410) : difference with theory (-64) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 156 (vertices=35, convex hull=55, v0=266360) After retessellation of defect 156 (v0=266360), euler #=-47 (332919,994411,661445) : difference with theory (-63) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 157 (vertices=12, convex hull=27, v0=267376) After retessellation of defect 157 (v0=267376), euler #=-46 (332920,994421,661455) : difference with theory (-62) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 158 (vertices=11, convex hull=33, v0=268522) After retessellation of defect 158 (v0=268522), euler #=-45 (332920,994430,661465) : difference with theory (-61) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 159 (vertices=64, convex hull=38, v0=269173) After retessellation of defect 159 (v0=269173), euler #=-44 (332923,994451,661484) : difference with theory (-60) = -16 CORRECTING DEFECT 160 (vertices=5672, convex hull=1831, v0=270504) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 160 (v0=270504), euler #=-54 (333161,996201,662986) : difference with theory (-59) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 161 (vertices=105, convex hull=54, v0=271391) After retessellation of defect 161 (v0=271391), euler #=-53 (333168,996248,663027) : difference with theory (-58) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 162 (vertices=38, convex hull=78, v0=272072) After retessellation of defect 162 (v0=272072), euler #=-52 (333177,996307,663078) : difference with theory (-57) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 163 (vertices=27, convex hull=51, v0=272188) After retessellation of defect 163 (v0=272188), euler #=-51 (333183,996343,663109) : difference with theory (-56) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 164 (vertices=6, convex hull=30, v0=276379) After retessellation of defect 164 (v0=276379), euler #=-50 (333185,996357,663122) : difference with theory (-55) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 165 (vertices=21, convex hull=20, v0=277350) After retessellation of defect 165 (v0=277350), euler #=-49 (333186,996366,663131) : difference with theory (-54) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 166 (vertices=120, convex hull=116, v0=277723) After retessellation of defect 166 (v0=277723), euler #=-48 (333201,996476,663227) : difference with theory (-53) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 167 (vertices=14, convex hull=28, v0=279839) After retessellation of defect 167 (v0=279839), euler #=-47 (333202,996490,663241) : difference with theory (-52) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 168 (vertices=612, convex hull=245, v0=280255) After retessellation of defect 168 (v0=280255), euler #=-45 (333241,996729,663443) : difference with theory (-51) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 169 (vertices=117, convex hull=124, v0=283768) After retessellation of defect 169 (v0=283768), euler #=-44 (333268,996863,663551) : difference with theory (-50) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 170 (vertices=33, convex hull=27, v0=287228) After retessellation of defect 170 (v0=287228), euler #=-43 (333269,996875,663563) : difference with theory (-49) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 171 (vertices=4534, convex hull=2080, v0=289608) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 171 (v0=289608), euler #=-46 (333918,999996,666032) : difference with theory (-48) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 172 (vertices=53, convex hull=29, v0=290876) After retessellation of defect 172 (v0=290876), euler #=-45 (333919,1000008,666044) : difference with theory (-47) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 173 (vertices=18, convex hull=44, v0=292273) After retessellation of defect 173 (v0=292273), euler #=-44 (333923,1000037,666070) : difference with theory (-46) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 174 (vertices=870, convex hull=184, v0=292650) After retessellation of defect 174 (v0=292650), euler #=-43 (333977,1000293,666273) : difference with theory (-45) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 175 (vertices=17, convex hull=53, v0=293554) After retessellation of defect 175 (v0=293554), euler #=-42 (333981,1000328,666305) : difference with theory (-44) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 176 (vertices=285, convex hull=130, v0=295968) After retessellation of defect 176 (v0=295968), euler #=-40 (334016,1000491,666435) : difference with theory (-43) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 177 (vertices=88, convex hull=50, v0=299977) After retessellation of defect 177 (v0=299977), euler #=-39 (334023,1000531,666469) : difference with theory (-42) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 178 (vertices=24, convex hull=62, v0=302326) After retessellation of defect 178 (v0=302326), euler #=-38 (334030,1000576,666508) : difference with theory (-41) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 179 (vertices=19, convex hull=38, v0=303760) After retessellation of defect 179 (v0=303760), euler #=-37 (334034,1000601,666530) : difference with theory (-40) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 180 (vertices=15, convex hull=26, v0=306714) After retessellation of defect 180 (v0=306714), euler #=-36 (334035,1000610,666539) : difference with theory (-39) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 181 (vertices=311, convex hull=165, v0=307196) After retessellation of defect 181 (v0=307196), euler #=-35 (334088,1000856,666733) : difference with theory (-38) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 182 (vertices=43, convex hull=34, v0=311056) After retessellation of defect 182 (v0=311056), euler #=-34 (334090,1000874,666750) : difference with theory (-37) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 183 (vertices=31, convex hull=50, v0=311668) After retessellation of defect 183 (v0=311668), euler #=-33 (334092,1000898,666773) : difference with theory (-36) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 184 (vertices=284, convex hull=161, v0=311832) After retessellation of defect 184 (v0=311832), euler #=-32 (334117,1001056,666907) : difference with theory (-35) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 185 (vertices=53, convex hull=67, v0=315305) After retessellation of defect 185 (v0=315305), euler #=-32 (334124,1001105,666949) : difference with theory (-34) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 186 (vertices=214, convex hull=96, v0=316669) After retessellation of defect 186 (v0=316669), euler #=-31 (334132,1001173,667010) : difference with theory (-33) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 187 (vertices=103, convex hull=70, v0=320772) After retessellation of defect 187 (v0=320772), euler #=-30 (334142,1001231,667059) : difference with theory (-32) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 188 (vertices=24, convex hull=23, v0=321579) After retessellation of defect 188 (v0=321579), euler #=-29 (334145,1001245,667071) : difference with theory (-31) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 189 (vertices=138, convex hull=117, v0=327612) After retessellation of defect 189 (v0=327612), euler #=-28 (334167,1001365,667170) : difference with theory (-30) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 190 (vertices=45, convex hull=69, v0=328942) After retessellation of defect 190 (v0=328942), euler #=-27 (334176,1001422,667219) : difference with theory (-29) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 191 (vertices=99, convex hull=59, v0=331427) After retessellation of defect 191 (v0=331427), euler #=-26 (334184,1001473,667263) : difference with theory (-28) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 192 (vertices=38, convex hull=41, v0=332111) After retessellation of defect 192 (v0=332111), euler #=-25 (334190,1001506,667291) : difference with theory (-27) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 193 (vertices=5, convex hull=16, v0=333986) After retessellation of defect 193 (v0=333986), euler #=-24 (334191,1001512,667297) : difference with theory (-26) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 194 (vertices=71, convex hull=84, v0=342629) After retessellation of defect 194 (v0=342629), euler #=-23 (334200,1001577,667354) : difference with theory (-25) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 195 (vertices=13, convex hull=24, v0=343083) After retessellation of defect 195 (v0=343083), euler #=-22 (334202,1001587,667363) : difference with theory (-24) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 196 (vertices=24, convex hull=41, v0=347155) After retessellation of defect 196 (v0=347155), euler #=-21 (334204,1001608,667383) : difference with theory (-23) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 197 (vertices=32, convex hull=27, v0=352948) After retessellation of defect 197 (v0=352948), euler #=-20 (334205,1001619,667394) : difference with theory (-22) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 198 (vertices=479, convex hull=305, v0=357683) After retessellation of defect 198 (v0=357683), euler #=-19 (334239,1001883,667625) : difference with theory (-21) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 199 (vertices=230, convex hull=195, v0=360779) After retessellation of defect 199 (v0=360779), euler #=-18 (334271,1002075,667786) : difference with theory (-20) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 200 (vertices=161, convex hull=163, v0=361411) After retessellation of defect 200 (v0=361411), euler #=-17 (334302,1002247,667928) : difference with theory (-19) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 201 (vertices=22, convex hull=29, v0=361592) After retessellation of defect 201 (v0=361592), euler #=-16 (334304,1002265,667945) : difference with theory (-18) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 202 (vertices=27, convex hull=20, v0=363587) After retessellation of defect 202 (v0=363587), euler #=-15 (334305,1002273,667953) : difference with theory (-17) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 203 (vertices=27, convex hull=53, v0=363599) After retessellation of defect 203 (v0=363599), euler #=-14 (334308,1002300,667978) : difference with theory (-16) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 204 (vertices=14, convex hull=21, v0=365959) After retessellation of defect 204 (v0=365959), euler #=-13 (334309,1002309,667987) : difference with theory (-15) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 205 (vertices=23, convex hull=23, v0=367941) After retessellation of defect 205 (v0=367941), euler #=-12 (334311,1002319,667996) : difference with theory (-14) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 206 (vertices=27, convex hull=50, v0=371752) After retessellation of defect 206 (v0=371752), euler #=-11 (334317,1002352,668024) : difference with theory (-13) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 207 (vertices=6, convex hull=34, v0=372106) After retessellation of defect 207 (v0=372106), euler #=-10 (334318,1002367,668039) : difference with theory (-12) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 208 (vertices=804, convex hull=303, v0=372681) After retessellation of defect 208 (v0=372681), euler #=-9 (334376,1002691,668306) : difference with theory (-11) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 209 (vertices=38, convex hull=71, v0=374140) After retessellation of defect 209 (v0=374140), euler #=-8 (334381,1002732,668343) : difference with theory (-10) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 210 (vertices=23, convex hull=49, v0=377476) After retessellation of defect 210 (v0=377476), euler #=-7 (334385,1002763,668371) : difference with theory (-9) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 211 (vertices=56, convex hull=64, v0=379485) After retessellation of defect 211 (v0=379485), euler #=-6 (334394,1002818,668418) : difference with theory (-8) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 212 (vertices=44, convex hull=64, v0=379523) After retessellation of defect 212 (v0=379523), euler #=-5 (334403,1002870,668462) : difference with theory (-7) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 213 (vertices=193, convex hull=158, v0=380553) After retessellation of defect 213 (v0=380553), euler #=-4 (334412,1002969,668553) : difference with theory (-6) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 214 (vertices=49, convex hull=72, v0=381038) After retessellation of defect 214 (v0=381038), euler #=-4 (334417,1003015,668594) : difference with theory (-5) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 215 (vertices=85, convex hull=130, v0=381582) After retessellation of defect 215 (v0=381582), euler #=-3 (334430,1003111,668678) : difference with theory (-4) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 216 (vertices=261, convex hull=126, v0=382566) After retessellation of defect 216 (v0=382566), euler #=-2 (334450,1003237,668785) : difference with theory (-3) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 217 (vertices=51, convex hull=64, v0=384019) After retessellation of defect 217 (v0=384019), euler #=-1 (334452,1003273,668820) : difference with theory (-2) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 218 (vertices=15, convex hull=21, v0=384312) After retessellation of defect 218 (v0=384312), euler #=0 (334453,1003283,668830) : difference with theory (-1) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 219 (vertices=63, convex hull=101, v0=385702) After retessellation of defect 219 (v0=385702), euler #=1 (334468,1003367,668900) : difference with theory (0) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 220 (vertices=22, convex hull=64, v0=386609) After retessellation of defect 220 (v0=386609), euler #=2 (334471,1003403,668934) : difference with theory (1) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 221 (vertices=10, convex hull=18, v0=387041) After retessellation of defect 221 (v0=387041), euler #=3 (334472,1003410,668941) : difference with theory (2) = -1 computing original vertex metric properties... storing new metric properties... computing tessellation statistics... vertex spacing 0.69 +- 0.30 (0.01-->30.29) (max @ vno 209377 --> 261700) face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00) performing soap bubble on retessellated vertices for 0 iterations... vertex spacing 0.69 +- 0.30 (0.01-->30.29) (max @ vno 209377 --> 261700) face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00) tessellation finished, orienting corrected surface... 791 mutations (35.8%), 1419 crossovers (64.2%), 2188 vertices were eliminated building final representation... 56206 vertices and 0 faces have been removed from triangulation after topology correction, eno=3 (nv=334472, nf=668941, ne=1003410, g=0) writing corrected surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.orig... defective orientation at vertex 221098(221099) with faces 433280 and 660190 edge (221098<-->221116) has too many faces (at least : 433280 660242) ! edge (221098<-->222741) has too many faces (at least : 660242 660157) ! defective orientation at vertex 221099(221098) with faces 433280 and 660190 defective orientation at vertex 221099(221117) with faces 433283 and 660189 defective orientation at vertex 221115(221116) with faces 433281 and 660243 defective orientation at vertex 221115(222741) with faces 660243 and 433282 edge (221116<-->221098) has too many faces (at least : 433280 660242) ! defective orientation at vertex 221116(221115) with faces 433281 and 660243 defective orientation at vertex 221116(221117) with faces 433283 and 660160 edge (221116<-->222741) has too many faces (at least : 660242 660159) ! defective orientation at vertex 221117(221099) with faces 433283 and 660189 defective orientation at vertex 221117(221116) with faces 433283 and 660160 defective orientation at vertex 222741(221115) with faces 433282 and 660243 edge (222741<-->221098) has too many faces (at least : 433282 660157) ! edge (222741<-->221116) has too many faces (at least : 660243 660159) ! 0.003 % of the vertices (10 vertices) exhibit an orientation change topology fixing took 601.2 minutes edge 221098 <--> 221116 has 3 face(s)! (433280,433281,660242) 221098 221099 221116 !!! edge 221098 <--> 222741 has 3 face(s)! (660242,433282,660157) 221098 222741 221116 !!! edge 221116 <--> 222741 has 3 face(s)! (660242,660243,660159) 221098 222741 221116 !!! 3 defective edges removing intersecting faces 000: 4362 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 4362 intersecting 002: 843 intersecting 003: 121 intersecting 004: 13 intersecting terminating search with 0 intersecting mris_fix_topology utimesec 36093.801908 mris_fix_topology stimesec 1.696742 mris_fix_topology ru_maxrss 1334456 mris_fix_topology ru_ixrss 0 mris_fix_topology ru_idrss 0 mris_fix_topology ru_isrss 0 mris_fix_topology ru_minflt 148962 mris_fix_topology ru_majflt 1 mris_fix_topology ru_nswap 0 mris_fix_topology ru_inblock 624 mris_fix_topology ru_oublock 32688 mris_fix_topology ru_msgsnd 0 mris_fix_topology ru_msgrcv 0 mris_fix_topology ru_nsignals 0 mris_fix_topology ru_nvcsw 7978 mris_fix_topology ru_nivcsw 45696 FSRUNTIME@ mris_fix_topology lh 10.0194 hours 1 threads #@# Fix Topology rh Fri Jul 14 03:03:26 EDT 2017 mris_fix_topology -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_fix_topology.rh.dat -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -ga -seed 1234 nmr01106 rh reading spherical homeomorphism from 'qsphere.nofix' using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 ************************************************************* Topology Correction Parameters retessellation mode: genetic search number of patches/generation : 10 number of generations : 10 surface mri loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 volume mri loglikelihood coefficient : 10.0 normal dot loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 volume resolution : 2 eliminate vertices during search : 1 initial patch selection : 1 select all defect vertices : 0 ordering dependant retessellation: 0 use precomputed edge table : 0 smooth retessellated patch : 2 match retessellated patch : 1 verbose mode : 0 ************************************************************* INFO: assuming .mgz format $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.51 2016/10/27 19:43:58 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ before topology correction, eno=-550 (nv=371222, nf=743544, ne=1115316, g=276) using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface... Correction of the Topology Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 12 iterations marking ambiguous vertices... 78801 ambiguous faces found in tessellation segmenting defects... 209 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions... analyzing neighboring defects... -merging segment 50 into 44 -merging segment 77 into 55 -merging segment 102 into 55 -merging segment 105 into 55 -merging segment 126 into 55 -merging segment 70 into 67 -merging segment 127 into 96 -merging segment 124 into 96 -merging segment 131 into 116 -merging segment 135 into 129 -merging segment 96 into 137 -merging segment 156 into 173 -merging segment 178 into 177 196 defects to be corrected 0 vertices coincident reading input surface /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.qsphere.nofix... reading brain volume from brain... reading wm segmentation from wm... Computing Initial Surface Statistics -face loglikelihood: -9.5785 (-4.7892) -vertex loglikelihood: -6.1764 (-3.0882) -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.4732 (-3.4732) -quad curv loglikelihood: -6.2786 (-3.1393) Total Loglikelihood : -25.5066 CORRECTING DEFECT 0 (vertices=319, convex hull=72, v0=106) After retessellation of defect 0 (v0=106), euler #=-185 (327096,971603,644322) : difference with theory (-193) = -8 CORRECTING DEFECT 1 (vertices=2958, convex hull=795, v0=2043) L defect detected... After retessellation of defect 1 (v0=2043), euler #=-185 (327327,972696,645184) : difference with theory (-192) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 2 (vertices=79, convex hull=88, v0=2710) After retessellation of defect 2 (v0=2710), euler #=-184 (327339,972767,645244) : difference with theory (-191) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=1104, convex hull=332, v0=3003) After retessellation of defect 3 (v0=3003), euler #=-183 (327380,973055,645492) : difference with theory (-190) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 4 (vertices=5, convex hull=26, v0=3929) After retessellation of defect 4 (v0=3929), euler #=-182 (327381,973064,645501) : difference with theory (-189) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=4606, convex hull=786, v0=4152) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 5 (v0=4152), euler #=-181 (327623,974194,646390) : difference with theory (-188) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=20, convex hull=20, v0=4774) After retessellation of defect 6 (v0=4774), euler #=-180 (327624,974201,646397) : difference with theory (-187) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=11, convex hull=29, v0=4873) After retessellation of defect 7 (v0=4873), euler #=-179 (327627,974218,646412) : difference with theory (-186) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 8 (vertices=35, convex hull=51, v0=9304) After retessellation of defect 8 (v0=9304), euler #=-178 (327635,974261,646448) : difference with theory (-185) = -7 CORRECTING DEFECT 9 (vertices=344, convex hull=163, v0=9446) After retessellation of defect 9 (v0=9446), euler #=-178 (327666,974445,646601) : difference with theory (-184) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 10 (vertices=151, convex hull=111, v0=19905) After retessellation of defect 10 (v0=19905), euler #=-177 (327682,974551,646692) : difference with theory (-183) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 11 (vertices=40, convex hull=59, v0=33164) After retessellation of defect 11 (v0=33164), euler #=-176 (327694,974611,646741) : difference with theory (-182) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 12 (vertices=70, convex hull=57, v0=38116) After retessellation of defect 12 (v0=38116), euler #=-175 (327702,974657,646780) : difference with theory (-181) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 13 (vertices=646, convex hull=272, v0=43286) After retessellation of defect 13 (v0=43286), euler #=-174 (327767,974983,647042) : difference with theory (-180) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 14 (vertices=77, convex hull=36, v0=45506) After retessellation of defect 14 (v0=45506), euler #=-173 (327770,975005,647062) : difference with theory (-179) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 15 (vertices=57, convex hull=85, v0=46736) After retessellation of defect 15 (v0=46736), euler #=-172 (327776,975060,647112) : difference with theory (-178) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 16 (vertices=6, convex hull=19, v0=47833) After retessellation of defect 16 (v0=47833), euler #=-171 (327776,975066,647119) : difference with theory (-177) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 17 (vertices=15, convex hull=20, v0=49031) After retessellation of defect 17 (v0=49031), euler #=-170 (327777,975074,647127) : difference with theory (-176) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 18 (vertices=51, convex hull=59, v0=50600) After retessellation of defect 18 (v0=50600), euler #=-169 (327785,975120,647166) : difference with theory (-175) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 19 (vertices=64, convex hull=86, v0=52480) After retessellation of defect 19 (v0=52480), euler #=-168 (327800,975205,647237) : difference with theory (-174) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 20 (vertices=28, convex hull=48, v0=54780) After retessellation of defect 20 (v0=54780), euler #=-167 (327805,975240,647268) : difference with theory (-173) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 21 (vertices=50, convex hull=54, v0=55190) After retessellation of defect 21 (v0=55190), euler #=-166 (327814,975289,647309) : difference with theory (-172) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 22 (vertices=62, convex hull=57, v0=66913) After retessellation of defect 22 (v0=66913), euler #=-165 (327822,975336,647349) : difference with theory (-171) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 23 (vertices=113, convex hull=118, v0=68052) After retessellation of defect 23 (v0=68052), euler #=-164 (327841,975445,647440) : difference with theory (-170) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 24 (vertices=143, convex hull=101, v0=70651) After retessellation of defect 24 (v0=70651), euler #=-163 (327849,975513,647501) : difference with theory (-169) = -6 CORRECTING DEFECT 25 (vertices=600, convex hull=356, v0=76223) After retessellation of defect 25 (v0=76223), euler #=-164 (327911,975892,647817) : difference with theory (-168) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 26 (vertices=36, convex hull=50, v0=77338) After retessellation of defect 26 (v0=77338), euler #=-163 (327916,975927,647848) : difference with theory (-167) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 27 (vertices=39, convex hull=34, v0=77378) After retessellation of defect 27 (v0=77378), euler #=-162 (327917,975943,647864) : difference with theory (-166) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 28 (vertices=42, convex hull=46, v0=77789) After retessellation of defect 28 (v0=77789), euler #=-161 (327920,975969,647888) : difference with theory (-165) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 29 (vertices=17, convex hull=24, v0=78511) After retessellation of defect 29 (v0=78511), euler #=-160 (327921,975979,647898) : difference with theory (-164) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 30 (vertices=518, convex hull=390, v0=79753) After retessellation of defect 30 (v0=79753), euler #=-159 (328002,976414,648253) : difference with theory (-163) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 31 (vertices=23, convex hull=26, v0=86431) After retessellation of defect 31 (v0=86431), euler #=-158 (328004,976429,648267) : difference with theory (-162) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 32 (vertices=17, convex hull=56, v0=88067) After retessellation of defect 32 (v0=88067), euler #=-157 (328006,976453,648290) : difference with theory (-161) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 33 (vertices=56, convex hull=93, v0=92858) After retessellation of defect 33 (v0=92858), euler #=-156 (328018,976527,648353) : difference with theory (-160) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 34 (vertices=34, convex hull=66, v0=98802) After retessellation of defect 34 (v0=98802), euler #=-155 (328024,976570,648391) : difference with theory (-159) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 35 (vertices=29, convex hull=23, v0=99998) After retessellation of defect 35 (v0=99998), euler #=-154 (328025,976582,648403) : difference with theory (-158) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 36 (vertices=31, convex hull=45, v0=101084) After retessellation of defect 36 (v0=101084), euler #=-153 (328030,976612,648429) : difference with theory (-157) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 37 (vertices=65, convex hull=69, v0=101330) After retessellation of defect 37 (v0=101330), euler #=-152 (328037,976667,648478) : difference with theory (-156) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 38 (vertices=29, convex hull=35, v0=102644) After retessellation of defect 38 (v0=102644), euler #=-151 (328041,976690,648498) : difference with theory (-155) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 39 (vertices=30, convex hull=73, v0=103657) After retessellation of defect 39 (v0=103657), euler #=-150 (328049,976743,648544) : difference with theory (-154) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 40 (vertices=5, convex hull=14, v0=105198) After retessellation of defect 40 (v0=105198), euler #=-149 (328049,976747,648549) : difference with theory (-153) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 41 (vertices=19, convex hull=61, v0=105718) After retessellation of defect 41 (v0=105718), euler #=-148 (328055,976782,648579) : difference with theory (-152) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 42 (vertices=17, convex hull=34, v0=110295) After retessellation of defect 42 (v0=110295), euler #=-147 (328060,976809,648602) : difference with theory (-151) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 43 (vertices=32, convex hull=75, v0=110478) After retessellation of defect 43 (v0=110478), euler #=-146 (328070,976872,648656) : difference with theory (-150) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 44 (vertices=31, convex hull=67, v0=112038) After retessellation of defect 44 (v0=112038), euler #=-144 (328078,976927,648705) : difference with theory (-149) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 45 (vertices=24, convex hull=24, v0=113120) After retessellation of defect 45 (v0=113120), euler #=-143 (328079,976937,648715) : difference with theory (-148) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 46 (vertices=32, convex hull=27, v0=116592) After retessellation of defect 46 (v0=116592), euler #=-142 (328082,976955,648731) : difference with theory (-147) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 47 (vertices=129, convex hull=150, v0=116957) After retessellation of defect 47 (v0=116957), euler #=-142 (328116,977132,648874) : difference with theory (-146) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 48 (vertices=311, convex hull=395, v0=118729) After retessellation of defect 48 (v0=118729), euler #=-142 (328195,977563,649226) : difference with theory (-145) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 49 (vertices=20, convex hull=62, v0=120283) After retessellation of defect 49 (v0=120283), euler #=-141 (328203,977609,649265) : difference with theory (-144) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 50 (vertices=69, convex hull=30, v0=125611) After retessellation of defect 50 (v0=125611), euler #=-140 (328204,977623,649279) : difference with theory (-143) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 51 (vertices=33, convex hull=55, v0=126971) After retessellation of defect 51 (v0=126971), euler #=-139 (328210,977661,649312) : difference with theory (-142) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 52 (vertices=139, convex hull=122, v0=127219) After retessellation of defect 52 (v0=127219), euler #=-138 (328230,977776,649408) : difference with theory (-141) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 53 (vertices=21, convex hull=81, v0=131459) After retessellation of defect 53 (v0=131459), euler #=-137 (328237,977824,649450) : difference with theory (-140) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 54 (vertices=10513, convex hull=2395, v0=131774) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 54 (v0=131774), euler #=-139 (328882,981138,652117) : difference with theory (-139) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 55 (vertices=154, convex hull=72, v0=133873) After retessellation of defect 55 (v0=133873), euler #=-138 (328894,981208,652176) : difference with theory (-138) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 56 (vertices=59, convex hull=50, v0=138554) After retessellation of defect 56 (v0=138554), euler #=-137 (328904,981256,652215) : difference with theory (-137) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 57 (vertices=75, convex hull=37, v0=139197) After retessellation of defect 57 (v0=139197), euler #=-136 (328907,981279,652236) : difference with theory (-136) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 58 (vertices=27, convex hull=85, v0=142618) After retessellation of defect 58 (v0=142618), euler #=-135 (328913,981327,652279) : difference with theory (-135) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 59 (vertices=31, convex hull=57, v0=144474) After retessellation of defect 59 (v0=144474), euler #=-134 (328922,981377,652321) : difference with theory (-134) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 60 (vertices=63, convex hull=69, v0=146303) After retessellation of defect 60 (v0=146303), euler #=-133 (328931,981432,652368) : difference with theory (-133) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 61 (vertices=299, convex hull=229, v0=146456) After retessellation of defect 61 (v0=146456), euler #=-132 (328947,981590,652511) : difference with theory (-132) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 62 (vertices=461, convex hull=142, v0=146505) After retessellation of defect 62 (v0=146505), euler #=-131 (328980,981757,652646) : difference with theory (-131) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 63 (vertices=67, convex hull=38, v0=148869) After retessellation of defect 63 (v0=148869), euler #=-130 (328984,981785,652671) : difference with theory (-130) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 64 (vertices=25, convex hull=31, v0=153468) After retessellation of defect 64 (v0=153468), euler #=-129 (328988,981806,652689) : difference with theory (-129) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 65 (vertices=39, convex hull=30, v0=155122) After retessellation of defect 65 (v0=155122), euler #=-128 (328990,981820,652702) : difference with theory (-128) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 66 (vertices=449, convex hull=400, v0=156758) After retessellation of defect 66 (v0=156758), euler #=-126 (329013,982096,652957) : difference with theory (-127) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 67 (vertices=209, convex hull=91, v0=159030) After retessellation of defect 67 (v0=159030), euler #=-125 (329030,982191,653036) : difference with theory (-126) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 68 (vertices=6, convex hull=30, v0=159528) After retessellation of defect 68 (v0=159528), euler #=-124 (329033,982207,653050) : difference with theory (-125) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 69 (vertices=105, convex hull=73, v0=166032) After retessellation of defect 69 (v0=166032), euler #=-123 (329042,982264,653099) : difference with theory (-124) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 70 (vertices=46, convex hull=74, v0=169632) After retessellation of defect 70 (v0=169632), euler #=-122 (329056,982337,653159) : difference with theory (-123) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 71 (vertices=97, convex hull=106, v0=172898) After retessellation of defect 71 (v0=172898), euler #=-121 (329065,982409,653223) : difference with theory (-122) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 72 (vertices=57, convex hull=93, v0=174453) After retessellation of defect 72 (v0=174453), euler #=-120 (329074,982474,653280) : difference with theory (-121) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 73 (vertices=69, convex hull=89, v0=175553) After retessellation of defect 73 (v0=175553), euler #=-119 (329083,982539,653337) : difference with theory (-120) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 74 (vertices=68, convex hull=36, v0=176412) After retessellation of defect 74 (v0=176412), euler #=-118 (329088,982568,653362) : difference with theory (-119) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 75 (vertices=738, convex hull=273, v0=179570) After retessellation of defect 75 (v0=179570), euler #=-117 (329114,982783,653552) : difference with theory (-118) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 76 (vertices=183, convex hull=70, v0=182938) After retessellation of defect 76 (v0=182938), euler #=-116 (329126,982845,653603) : difference with theory (-117) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 77 (vertices=5, convex hull=24, v0=183173) After retessellation of defect 77 (v0=183173), euler #=-115 (329127,982854,653612) : difference with theory (-116) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 78 (vertices=205, convex hull=61, v0=186006) After retessellation of defect 78 (v0=186006), euler #=-114 (329139,982917,653664) : difference with theory (-115) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 79 (vertices=6, convex hull=28, v0=188525) After retessellation of defect 79 (v0=188525), euler #=-113 (329142,982933,653678) : difference with theory (-114) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 80 (vertices=58, convex hull=76, v0=191882) After retessellation of defect 80 (v0=191882), euler #=-112 (329155,983004,653737) : difference with theory (-113) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 81 (vertices=54, convex hull=43, v0=192546) After retessellation of defect 81 (v0=192546), euler #=-111 (329163,983044,653770) : difference with theory (-112) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 82 (vertices=14, convex hull=39, v0=194139) After retessellation of defect 82 (v0=194139), euler #=-110 (329166,983066,653790) : difference with theory (-111) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 83 (vertices=50, convex hull=24, v0=195154) After retessellation of defect 83 (v0=195154), euler #=-109 (329170,983083,653804) : difference with theory (-110) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 84 (vertices=5, convex hull=25, v0=199882) After retessellation of defect 84 (v0=199882), euler #=-108 (329170,983089,653811) : difference with theory (-109) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 85 (vertices=116, convex hull=39, v0=202005) After retessellation of defect 85 (v0=202005), euler #=-107 (329178,983125,653840) : difference with theory (-108) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 86 (vertices=280, convex hull=129, v0=204257) After retessellation of defect 86 (v0=204257), euler #=-106 (329212,983295,653977) : difference with theory (-107) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 87 (vertices=23, convex hull=51, v0=207655) After retessellation of defect 87 (v0=207655), euler #=-105 (329219,983337,654013) : difference with theory (-106) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 88 (vertices=21, convex hull=46, v0=207703) After retessellation of defect 88 (v0=207703), euler #=-104 (329226,983377,654047) : difference with theory (-105) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 89 (vertices=5, convex hull=21, v0=208164) After retessellation of defect 89 (v0=208164), euler #=-103 (329227,983386,654056) : difference with theory (-104) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 90 (vertices=18, convex hull=31, v0=217242) After retessellation of defect 90 (v0=217242), euler #=-102 (329228,983400,654070) : difference with theory (-103) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 91 (vertices=86, convex hull=121, v0=219658) After retessellation of defect 91 (v0=219658), euler #=-101 (329247,983507,654159) : difference with theory (-102) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 92 (vertices=72, convex hull=83, v0=220319) After retessellation of defect 92 (v0=220319), euler #=-100 (329259,983583,654224) : difference with theory (-101) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 93 (vertices=25, convex hull=62, v0=221594) After retessellation of defect 93 (v0=221594), euler #=-99 (329267,983627,654261) : difference with theory (-100) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 94 (vertices=26, convex hull=56, v0=222038) After retessellation of defect 94 (v0=222038), euler #=-98 (329276,983677,654303) : difference with theory (-99) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 95 (vertices=19, convex hull=21, v0=222524) After retessellation of defect 95 (v0=222524), euler #=-97 (329278,983689,654314) : difference with theory (-98) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 96 (vertices=36, convex hull=63, v0=223473) After retessellation of defect 96 (v0=223473), euler #=-96 (329293,983757,654368) : difference with theory (-97) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 97 (vertices=6, convex hull=14, v0=223480) After retessellation of defect 97 (v0=223480), euler #=-95 (329294,983763,654374) : difference with theory (-96) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 98 (vertices=45, convex hull=89, v0=225338) After retessellation of defect 98 (v0=225338), euler #=-94 (329303,983823,654426) : difference with theory (-95) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 99 (vertices=165, convex hull=81, v0=226406) After retessellation of defect 99 (v0=226406), euler #=-93 (329320,983906,654493) : difference with theory (-94) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 100 (vertices=7, convex hull=27, v0=231547) After retessellation of defect 100 (v0=231547), euler #=-92 (329321,983914,654501) : difference with theory (-93) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 101 (vertices=32, convex hull=62, v0=232227) After retessellation of defect 101 (v0=232227), euler #=-91 (329330,983964,654543) : difference with theory (-92) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 102 (vertices=277, convex hull=180, v0=234836) After retessellation of defect 102 (v0=234836), euler #=-90 (329378,984189,654721) : difference with theory (-91) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 103 (vertices=21, convex hull=48, v0=236251) After retessellation of defect 103 (v0=236251), euler #=-89 (329382,984217,654746) : difference with theory (-90) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 104 (vertices=34, convex hull=35, v0=237285) After retessellation of defect 104 (v0=237285), euler #=-88 (329384,984238,654766) : difference with theory (-89) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 105 (vertices=610, convex hull=258, v0=237955) After retessellation of defect 105 (v0=237955), euler #=-87 (329406,984443,654950) : difference with theory (-88) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 106 (vertices=34, convex hull=41, v0=239848) After retessellation of defect 106 (v0=239848), euler #=-86 (329408,984463,654969) : difference with theory (-87) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 107 (vertices=19, convex hull=24, v0=244451) After retessellation of defect 107 (v0=244451), euler #=-85 (329411,984479,654983) : difference with theory (-86) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 108 (vertices=25, convex hull=33, v0=245423) After retessellation of defect 108 (v0=245423), euler #=-84 (329417,984507,655006) : difference with theory (-85) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 109 (vertices=59, convex hull=50, v0=249614) After retessellation of defect 109 (v0=249614), euler #=-83 (329421,984534,655030) : difference with theory (-84) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 110 (vertices=401, convex hull=64, v0=249688) After retessellation of defect 110 (v0=249688), euler #=-81 (329446,984639,655112) : difference with theory (-83) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 111 (vertices=305, convex hull=240, v0=250079) After retessellation of defect 111 (v0=250079), euler #=-80 (329480,984857,655297) : difference with theory (-82) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 112 (vertices=10, convex hull=24, v0=254172) After retessellation of defect 112 (v0=254172), euler #=-79 (329482,984869,655308) : difference with theory (-81) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 113 (vertices=11, convex hull=25, v0=255596) After retessellation of defect 113 (v0=255596), euler #=-78 (329483,984881,655320) : difference with theory (-80) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 114 (vertices=190, convex hull=99, v0=257460) After retessellation of defect 114 (v0=257460), euler #=-77 (329492,984949,655380) : difference with theory (-79) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 115 (vertices=34, convex hull=32, v0=259893) After retessellation of defect 115 (v0=259893), euler #=-76 (329495,984968,655397) : difference with theory (-78) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 116 (vertices=61, convex hull=120, v0=261396) After retessellation of defect 116 (v0=261396), euler #=-75 (329505,985048,655468) : difference with theory (-77) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 117 (vertices=134, convex hull=50, v0=262257) After retessellation of defect 117 (v0=262257), euler #=-74 (329517,985105,655514) : difference with theory (-76) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 118 (vertices=29, convex hull=63, v0=263063) After retessellation of defect 118 (v0=263063), euler #=-73 (329524,985152,655555) : difference with theory (-75) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 119 (vertices=89, convex hull=78, v0=272346) After retessellation of defect 119 (v0=272346), euler #=-72 (329533,985214,655609) : difference with theory (-74) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 120 (vertices=106, convex hull=140, v0=273421) After retessellation of defect 120 (v0=273421), euler #=-70 (329553,985338,655715) : difference with theory (-73) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 121 (vertices=7, convex hull=21, v0=275140) After retessellation of defect 121 (v0=275140), euler #=-69 (329555,985348,655724) : difference with theory (-72) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 122 (vertices=204, convex hull=88, v0=277168) After retessellation of defect 122 (v0=277168), euler #=-68 (329564,985416,655784) : difference with theory (-71) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 123 (vertices=622, convex hull=349, v0=277650) After retessellation of defect 123 (v0=277650), euler #=-68 (329657,985887,656162) : difference with theory (-70) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 124 (vertices=425, convex hull=114, v0=281106) After retessellation of defect 124 (v0=281106), euler #=-67 (329686,986030,656277) : difference with theory (-69) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 125 (vertices=36, convex hull=36, v0=281414) After retessellation of defect 125 (v0=281414), euler #=-66 (329689,986049,656294) : difference with theory (-68) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 126 (vertices=3423, convex hull=1034, v0=282716) XL defect detected... After retessellation of defect 126 (v0=282716), euler #=-65 (330028,987637,657544) : difference with theory (-67) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 127 (vertices=10, convex hull=31, v0=282816) After retessellation of defect 127 (v0=282816), euler #=-64 (330029,987650,657557) : difference with theory (-66) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 128 (vertices=19, convex hull=31, v0=282923) After retessellation of defect 128 (v0=282923), euler #=-63 (330031,987668,657574) : difference with theory (-65) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 129 (vertices=18, convex hull=40, v0=285406) After retessellation of defect 129 (v0=285406), euler #=-62 (330037,987700,657601) : difference with theory (-64) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 130 (vertices=82, convex hull=39, v0=288032) After retessellation of defect 130 (v0=288032), euler #=-61 (330044,987734,657629) : difference with theory (-63) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 131 (vertices=24, convex hull=42, v0=288465) After retessellation of defect 131 (v0=288465), euler #=-60 (330051,987773,657662) : difference with theory (-62) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 132 (vertices=63, convex hull=40, v0=288890) After retessellation of defect 132 (v0=288890), euler #=-59 (330055,987801,657687) : difference with theory (-61) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 133 (vertices=43, convex hull=86, v0=290621) After retessellation of defect 133 (v0=290621), euler #=-58 (330064,987862,657740) : difference with theory (-60) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 134 (vertices=20, convex hull=29, v0=291812) After retessellation of defect 134 (v0=291812), euler #=-57 (330068,987885,657760) : difference with theory (-59) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 135 (vertices=546, convex hull=185, v0=294782) After retessellation of defect 135 (v0=294782), euler #=-59 (330119,988150,657972) : difference with theory (-58) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 136 (vertices=58, convex hull=35, v0=294915) After retessellation of defect 136 (v0=294915), euler #=-58 (330122,988171,657991) : difference with theory (-57) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 137 (vertices=165, convex hull=72, v0=295037) After retessellation of defect 137 (v0=295037), euler #=-57 (330132,988231,658042) : difference with theory (-56) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 138 (vertices=64, convex hull=54, v0=297287) After retessellation of defect 138 (v0=297287), euler #=-56 (330137,988269,658076) : difference with theory (-55) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 139 (vertices=352, convex hull=97, v0=297943) After retessellation of defect 139 (v0=297943), euler #=-55 (330147,988353,658151) : difference with theory (-54) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 140 (vertices=49, convex hull=32, v0=300744) After retessellation of defect 140 (v0=300744), euler #=-54 (330150,988373,658169) : difference with theory (-53) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 141 (vertices=5, convex hull=10, v0=301421) After retessellation of defect 141 (v0=301421), euler #=-53 (330150,988375,658172) : difference with theory (-52) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 142 (vertices=25, convex hull=63, v0=303556) After retessellation of defect 142 (v0=303556), euler #=-52 (330155,988411,658204) : difference with theory (-51) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 143 (vertices=45, convex hull=45, v0=303741) After retessellation of defect 143 (v0=303741), euler #=-51 (330161,988443,658231) : difference with theory (-50) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 144 (vertices=83, convex hull=60, v0=303883) After retessellation of defect 144 (v0=303883), euler #=-51 (330167,988500,658282) : difference with theory (-49) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 145 (vertices=147, convex hull=41, v0=304749) After retessellation of defect 145 (v0=304749), euler #=-50 (330176,988545,658319) : difference with theory (-48) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 146 (vertices=30, convex hull=58, v0=306683) After retessellation of defect 146 (v0=306683), euler #=-49 (330182,988585,658354) : difference with theory (-47) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 147 (vertices=14, convex hull=25, v0=306792) After retessellation of defect 147 (v0=306792), euler #=-48 (330183,988597,658366) : difference with theory (-46) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 148 (vertices=9, convex hull=21, v0=309309) After retessellation of defect 148 (v0=309309), euler #=-47 (330184,988602,658371) : difference with theory (-45) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 149 (vertices=15, convex hull=21, v0=310044) After retessellation of defect 149 (v0=310044), euler #=-46 (330185,988612,658381) : difference with theory (-44) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 150 (vertices=5, convex hull=16, v0=311229) After retessellation of defect 150 (v0=311229), euler #=-45 (330186,988619,658388) : difference with theory (-43) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 151 (vertices=54, convex hull=50, v0=312110) After retessellation of defect 151 (v0=312110), euler #=-44 (330194,988659,658421) : difference with theory (-42) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 152 (vertices=50, convex hull=74, v0=313727) After retessellation of defect 152 (v0=313727), euler #=-43 (330206,988726,658477) : difference with theory (-41) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 153 (vertices=32, convex hull=52, v0=313826) After retessellation of defect 153 (v0=313826), euler #=-42 (330210,988758,658506) : difference with theory (-40) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 154 (vertices=763, convex hull=460, v0=314090) After retessellation of defect 154 (v0=314090), euler #=-41 (330299,989254,658914) : difference with theory (-39) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 155 (vertices=243, convex hull=232, v0=315234) After retessellation of defect 155 (v0=315234), euler #=-40 (330330,989459,659089) : difference with theory (-38) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 156 (vertices=85, convex hull=93, v0=315552) After retessellation of defect 156 (v0=315552), euler #=-39 (330345,989546,659162) : difference with theory (-37) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 157 (vertices=1189, convex hull=489, v0=315944) After retessellation of defect 157 (v0=315944), euler #=-38 (330489,990234,659707) : difference with theory (-36) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 158 (vertices=91, convex hull=81, v0=316624) After retessellation of defect 158 (v0=316624), euler #=-37 (330498,990297,659762) : difference with theory (-35) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 159 (vertices=13, convex hull=34, v0=317518) After retessellation of defect 159 (v0=317518), euler #=-36 (330499,990313,659778) : difference with theory (-34) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 160 (vertices=50, convex hull=64, v0=319601) After retessellation of defect 160 (v0=319601), euler #=-35 (330504,990355,659816) : difference with theory (-33) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 161 (vertices=549, convex hull=319, v0=320925) After retessellation of defect 161 (v0=320925), euler #=-33 (330580,990738,660125) : difference with theory (-32) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 162 (vertices=42, convex hull=54, v0=323357) After retessellation of defect 162 (v0=323357), euler #=-32 (330583,990767,660152) : difference with theory (-31) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 163 (vertices=13, convex hull=17, v0=324787) After retessellation of defect 163 (v0=324787), euler #=-31 (330583,990770,660156) : difference with theory (-30) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 164 (vertices=11, convex hull=15, v0=325498) After retessellation of defect 164 (v0=325498), euler #=-30 (330583,990774,660161) : difference with theory (-29) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 165 (vertices=112, convex hull=117, v0=325792) After retessellation of defect 165 (v0=325792), euler #=-28 (330602,990888,660258) : difference with theory (-28) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 166 (vertices=6, convex hull=18, v0=327625) After retessellation of defect 166 (v0=327625), euler #=-27 (330602,990894,660265) : difference with theory (-27) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 167 (vertices=15, convex hull=14, v0=328385) After retessellation of defect 167 (v0=328385), euler #=-26 (330602,990897,660269) : difference with theory (-26) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 168 (vertices=16, convex hull=27, v0=329768) After retessellation of defect 168 (v0=329768), euler #=-25 (330604,990911,660282) : difference with theory (-25) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 169 (vertices=30, convex hull=68, v0=330136) After retessellation of defect 169 (v0=330136), euler #=-24 (330610,990957,660323) : difference with theory (-24) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 170 (vertices=10, convex hull=16, v0=331171) After retessellation of defect 170 (v0=331171), euler #=-23 (330610,990963,660330) : difference with theory (-23) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 171 (vertices=111, convex hull=51, v0=331184) After retessellation of defect 171 (v0=331184), euler #=-22 (330613,990990,660355) : difference with theory (-22) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 172 (vertices=198, convex hull=109, v0=331980) After retessellation of defect 172 (v0=331980), euler #=-21 (330622,991072,660429) : difference with theory (-21) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 173 (vertices=107, convex hull=56, v0=332425) After retessellation of defect 173 (v0=332425), euler #=-20 (330627,991117,660470) : difference with theory (-20) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 174 (vertices=27, convex hull=24, v0=334445) After retessellation of defect 174 (v0=334445), euler #=-19 (330629,991130,660482) : difference with theory (-19) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 175 (vertices=87, convex hull=68, v0=334717) After retessellation of defect 175 (v0=334717), euler #=-18 (330640,991190,660532) : difference with theory (-18) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 176 (vertices=115, convex hull=60, v0=340803) After retessellation of defect 176 (v0=340803), euler #=-17 (330649,991240,660574) : difference with theory (-17) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 177 (vertices=359, convex hull=186, v0=341000) After retessellation of defect 177 (v0=341000), euler #=-16 (330683,991432,660733) : difference with theory (-16) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 178 (vertices=14, convex hull=26, v0=342272) After retessellation of defect 178 (v0=342272), euler #=-15 (330684,991444,660745) : difference with theory (-15) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 179 (vertices=91, convex hull=75, v0=344021) After retessellation of defect 179 (v0=344021), euler #=-14 (330695,991504,660795) : difference with theory (-14) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 180 (vertices=104, convex hull=55, v0=345244) After retessellation of defect 180 (v0=345244), euler #=-13 (330700,991544,660831) : difference with theory (-13) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 181 (vertices=107, convex hull=68, v0=349650) After retessellation of defect 181 (v0=349650), euler #=-12 (330709,991603,660882) : difference with theory (-12) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 182 (vertices=24, convex hull=31, v0=351643) After retessellation of defect 182 (v0=351643), euler #=-11 (330710,991616,660895) : difference with theory (-11) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 183 (vertices=35, convex hull=54, v0=352923) After retessellation of defect 183 (v0=352923), euler #=-10 (330716,991654,660928) : difference with theory (-10) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 184 (vertices=36, convex hull=62, v0=356384) After retessellation of defect 184 (v0=356384), euler #=-9 (330723,991699,660967) : difference with theory (-9) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 185 (vertices=35, convex hull=34, v0=357964) After retessellation of defect 185 (v0=357964), euler #=-8 (330726,991718,660984) : difference with theory (-8) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 186 (vertices=26, convex hull=45, v0=358428) After retessellation of defect 186 (v0=358428), euler #=-7 (330728,991736,661001) : difference with theory (-7) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 187 (vertices=62, convex hull=92, v0=358810) After retessellation of defect 187 (v0=358810), euler #=-6 (330736,991795,661053) : difference with theory (-6) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 188 (vertices=79, convex hull=76, v0=358891) After retessellation of defect 188 (v0=358891), euler #=-5 (330745,991857,661107) : difference with theory (-5) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 189 (vertices=94, convex hull=111, v0=359028) After retessellation of defect 189 (v0=359028), euler #=-4 (330753,991935,661178) : difference with theory (-4) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 190 (vertices=11, convex hull=23, v0=359684) After retessellation of defect 190 (v0=359684), euler #=-3 (330754,991946,661189) : difference with theory (-3) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 191 (vertices=295, convex hull=215, v0=360306) After retessellation of defect 191 (v0=360306), euler #=-2 (330794,992170,661374) : difference with theory (-2) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 192 (vertices=419, convex hull=198, v0=361173) After retessellation of defect 192 (v0=361173), euler #=-1 (330841,992409,661567) : difference with theory (-1) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 193 (vertices=72, convex hull=81, v0=361673) After retessellation of defect 193 (v0=361673), euler #=0 (330852,992477,661625) : difference with theory (0) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 194 (vertices=430, convex hull=136, v0=363550) After retessellation of defect 194 (v0=363550), euler #=1 (330865,992584,661720) : difference with theory (1) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 195 (vertices=15, convex hull=20, v0=369399) After retessellation of defect 195 (v0=369399), euler #=2 (330866,992592,661728) : difference with theory (2) = 0 computing original vertex metric properties... storing new metric properties... computing tessellation statistics... vertex spacing 0.68 +- 0.27 (0.07-->19.46) (max @ vno 131110 --> 141768) face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00) performing soap bubble on retessellated vertices for 0 iterations... vertex spacing 0.68 +- 0.27 (0.07-->19.46) (max @ vno 131110 --> 141768) face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00) tessellation finished, orienting corrected surface... 710 mutations (36.7%), 1225 crossovers (63.3%), 1398 vertices were eliminated building final representation... 40356 vertices and 0 faces have been removed from triangulation after topology correction, eno=2 (nv=330866, nf=661728, ne=992592, g=0) writing corrected surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.orig... defective orientation at vertex 114205(114215) with faces 227027 and 649194 defective orientation at vertex 114205(114206) with faces 227027 and 649221 defective orientation at vertex 114206(114205) with faces 227027 and 649221 defective orientation at vertex 114206(116051) with faces 227028 and 649218 defective orientation at vertex 114215(114205) with faces 227027 and 649194 defective orientation at vertex 114215(116051) with faces 227028 and 649219 defective orientation at vertex 116051(114206) with faces 227028 and 649218 defective orientation at vertex 116051(114215) with faces 227028 and 649219 0.002 % of the vertices (8 vertices) exhibit an orientation change topology fixing took 408.5 minutes 0 defective edges removing intersecting faces 000: 3082 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 3082 intersecting 002: 630 intersecting 003: 66 intersecting 004: 4 intersecting terminating search with 0 intersecting mris_fix_topology utimesec 24534.575177 mris_fix_topology stimesec 1.311800 mris_fix_topology ru_maxrss 1202712 mris_fix_topology ru_ixrss 0 mris_fix_topology ru_idrss 0 mris_fix_topology ru_isrss 0 mris_fix_topology ru_minflt 140084 mris_fix_topology ru_majflt 0 mris_fix_topology ru_nswap 0 mris_fix_topology ru_inblock 0 mris_fix_topology ru_oublock 31984 mris_fix_topology ru_msgsnd 0 mris_fix_topology ru_msgrcv 0 mris_fix_topology ru_nsignals 0 mris_fix_topology ru_nvcsw 6823 mris_fix_topology ru_nivcsw 27700 FSRUNTIME@ mris_fix_topology rh 6.8083 hours 1 threads mris_euler_number ../surf/lh.orig mris_fix_topology failed on lh! (euler number != 2) Trying new mris_topo_fixer on lh... cp ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 334472 - 1003410 + 668941 = 3 --> 0 holes F =2V-4: 668941 != 668944-4 (-1) 2E=3F: 2006820 != 2006823 (-3) total defect index = 4 mris_euler_number ../surf/rh.orig euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 330866 - 992592 + 661728 = 2 --> 0 holes F =2V-4: 661728 = 661732-4 (0) 2E=3F: 1985184 = 1985184 (0) total defect index = 0 cp ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix ../surf/lh.qsphere cp ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/lh.smoothwm mris_topo_fixer -mgz -warnings -seed 1234 nmr01106 lh verbose mode on (medium mode): printing warnings setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 Before topology correction, eno=-822 (nv=390678, nf=783000, ne=1174500, g=412) Surface Diagnostics: eno=-822 (nv=390678, nf=783000, ne=1174500) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 The original surface is a valid manifold Counting the number of connected components The original surface has one component The original surface does not self-intersect The surface has 412 loops (X=-822) Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 12 iterations identify defects... marking ambiguous vertices... 112542 ambiguous faces found in tessellation segmenting defects... analyzing defects for overlaps... INFO: assuming .mgz format reading input surface /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.orig... reading brain volume from brain... reading wm segmentation from wm... Detecting contrast direction: right direction [ GM (82.58) < WM (98.50) ] Computing Initial Surface Statistics -face loglikelihood: -6.2993 (-3.1497) -vertex loglikelihood: -6.2802 (-3.1401) -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.4107 (-3.4107) -quad curv loglikelihood: -6.6038 (-3.3019) Total Loglikelihood : -22.5939 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 1 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 1!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -822 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-822 (nv=390678, nf=783000, ne=1174500) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 2 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 2!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -822 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-822 (nv=390678, nf=783000, ne=1174500) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 3 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 3: 54 vertices location: [ (202,150,43) - average intensity = 89.851 ] -gray ( 75.36 , 11.08 ) -white ( 96.53 , 2.86 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (75.357162 [log = -3.322665 ]- 96.527184 [log = -1.991283 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 86(86) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -36.07948 mri =0.000 curv = 9.153 unmri = -0.531 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.15 , q= 18.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.15 , q= 18.31 ) 28 patches have been generated - 14 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -36.07948 # generated patches : 28 (14 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -820 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-820 (nv=390700, nf=783040, ne=1174560) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 4 with euler number -25 (13 loops) computing statistics for defect 4: 4651 vertices location: [ (207,136,63) - average intensity = 91.355 ] -gray ( 80.12 , 8.30 ) -white ( 98.29 , 4.10 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.121933 [log = -2.882159 ]- 98.293282 [log = -2.359004 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 9016(9016) - loop = 1 (13) - ntries = [153,3616] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.02909 mri =0.000 curv = 0.727 unmri = -0.880 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.73 , q= 1.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.73 , q= 1.45 ) 307 patches have been generated - 155 self-intersected max face = 9016(9068) - loop = 2 (13) - ntries = [153,3616] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.71497 mri =0.000 curv = 0.729 unmri = -1.200 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.73 , q= 1.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.73 , q= 1.46 ) 307 patches have been generated - 155 self-intersected max face = 9016(9112) - loop = 3 (13) - ntries = [153,3616] 459 patches have been generated - 459 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 4 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -820 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-820 (nv=390700, nf=783040, ne=1174560) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 5 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 5!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -820 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-820 (nv=390700, nf=783040, ne=1174560) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 6 with euler number -21 (11 loops) computing statistics for defect 6: 4623 vertices location: [ (192,164,65) - average intensity = 90.338 ] -gray ( 77.06 , 8.57 ) -white ( 99.83 , 4.05 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (77.058464 [log = -3.129075 ]- 99.825081 [log = -2.377723 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 8981(8981) - loop = 1 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -87.68007 mri =0.000 curv = 1.827 unmri = 80.372 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) 363 patches have been generated - 183 self-intersected max face = 8981(9209) - loop = 2 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -88.82745 mri =0.000 curv = 2.392 unmri = 79.260 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) 363 patches have been generated - 183 self-intersected max face = 8981(9257) - loop = 3 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -258.78137 mri =0.000 curv = 3.294 unmri = 245.605 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) 363 patches have been generated - 183 self-intersected max face = 8981(9533) - loop = 4 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -284.61133 mri =0.000 curv = 3.875 unmri = 269.113 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.87 , q= 7.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.87 , q= 7.75 ) 363 patches have been generated - 183 self-intersected max face = 8981(9713) - loop = 5 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -280.14217 mri =0.000 curv = 3.986 unmri = 264.198 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.99 , q= 7.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.99 , q= 7.97 ) 363 patches have been generated - 183 self-intersected max face = 8981(9941) - loop = 6 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -296.36580 mri =0.000 curv = 3.966 unmri = 280.501 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.97 , q= 7.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.97 , q= 7.93 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -287.65473 mri =0.000 curv = 5.482 unmri = 265.727 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.48 , q= 10.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.48 , q= 10.96 ) 363 patches have been generated - 3 self-intersected max face = 8981(10065) - loop = 7 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] BEST FITNESS (o)is -287.84210 mri =0.000 curv = 5.529 unmri = 265.727 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.53 , q= 11.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.53 , q= 11.06 ) 363 patches have been generated - 183 self-intersected max face = 8981(10117) - loop = 8 (11) - ntries = [181,3602] 543 patches have been generated - 543 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 6 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -820 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-820 (nv=390700, nf=783040, ne=1174560) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 7 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 7: 286 vertices location: [ (204,163,47) - average intensity = 92.107 ] -gray ( 79.90 , 8.70 ) -white ( 99.63 , 3.85 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (79.897774 [log = -2.884492 ]- 99.632256 [log = -2.312453 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 534(534) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [81,224] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.33798 mri =0.000 curv = 2.042 unmri = 2.171 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.04 , q= 4.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.04 , q= 4.08 ) 162 patches have been generated - 81 self-intersected max face = 534(586) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [81,224] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.92930 mri =0.000 curv = 2.388 unmri = 2.378 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) 162 patches have been generated - 81 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.92930 # generated patches : 324 (162 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -816 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-816 (nv=390766, nf=783164, ne=1174746) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 8 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 8: 759 vertices location: [ (188,156,51) - average intensity = 93.239 ] -gray ( 82.97 , 4.52 ) -white ( 99.27 , 3.38 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.969872 [log = -2.512750 ]- 99.274826 [log = -2.057443 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1420(1420) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [214,578] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.14071 mri =0.000 curv = 1.100 unmri = -0.260 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.20 ) 428 patches have been generated - 214 self-intersected max face = 1420(1460) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [214,578] BEST FITNESS (o)is -489.67472 mri =0.000 curv = 121.663 unmri = 3.022 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=121.66 , q= 243.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=121.66 , q= 243.33 ) 428 patches have been generated - 214 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -489.67471 # generated patches : 856 (428 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -812 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-812 (nv=390852, nf=783328, ne=1174992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 9 with euler number -19 (10 loops) computing statistics for defect 9: 4145 vertices location: [ (219,160,62) - average intensity = 90.828 ] -gray ( 73.72 , 12.71 ) -white ( 99.66 , 4.40 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (73.719421 [log = -3.512455 ]- 99.661995 [log = -2.491089 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 7981(7981) - loop = 1 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.16150 mri =0.000 curv = 0.910 unmri = 0.523 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.91 , q= 1.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.91 , q= 1.82 ) 400 patches have been generated - 200 self-intersected max face = 7981(8021) - loop = 2 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -39.27843 mri =0.000 curv = 0.997 unmri = 35.292 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.00 , q= 1.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.00 , q= 1.99 ) 401 patches have been generated - 202 self-intersected max face = 7981(8249) - loop = 3 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -144.14900 mri =0.000 curv = 1.534 unmri = 138.012 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.53 , q= 3.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.53 , q= 3.07 ) 401 patches have been generated - 202 self-intersected max face = 7981(8513) - loop = 4 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -148.59119 mri =0.000 curv = 1.522 unmri = 142.502 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -148.15008 mri =0.000 curv = 1.523 unmri = 142.057 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.05 ) 400 patches have been generated - 200 self-intersected max face = 7981(8581) - loop = 5 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -152.09667 mri =0.000 curv = 1.518 unmri = 146.026 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) 599 patches have been generated - 598 self-intersected max face = 7981(8641) - loop = 6 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -156.83254 mri =0.000 curv = 1.509 unmri = 150.798 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.51 , q= 3.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.51 , q= 3.02 ) 599 patches have been generated - 598 self-intersected max face = 7981(8701) - loop = 7 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -158.79497 mri =0.000 curv = 1.624 unmri = 152.300 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) 599 patches have been generated - 598 self-intersected max face = 7981(8773) - loop = 8 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -164.28610 mri =0.000 curv = 1.636 unmri = 157.742 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.27 ) 599 patches have been generated - 598 self-intersected max face = 7981(8845) - loop = 9 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -183.42541 mri =0.000 curv = 4.286 unmri = 166.283 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.29 , q= 8.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.29 , q= 8.57 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -181.75972 mri =0.000 curv = 3.708 unmri = 166.927 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) 400 patches have been generated - 200 self-intersected max face = 7981(8981) - loop = 10 (10) - ntries = [200,3202] BEST FITNESS (o)is -203.13582 mri =0.000 curv = 3.674 unmri = 188.439 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.67 , q= 7.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.67 , q= 7.35 ) 599 patches have been generated - 598 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -203.13582 # generated patches : 4997 (3994 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -792 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-792 (nv=391422, nf=784428, ne=1176642) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 10 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 10: 194 vertices location: [ (215,151,54) - average intensity = 92.958 ] -gray ( 72.05 , 13.54 ) -white ( 100.79 , 11.82 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (72.050323 [log = -3.311408 ]- 100.794800 [log = -2.408905 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 352(352) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [54,151] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.41105 mri =0.000 curv = 5.520 unmri = -3.669 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.52 , q= 11.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.52 , q= 11.04 ) 109 patches have been generated - 56 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -18.41105 # generated patches : 109 (56 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -790 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-790 (nv=391468, nf=784516, ne=1176774) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 11 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 11: 3482 vertices location: [ (193,131,76) - average intensity = 90.839 ] -gray ( 83.13 , 5.66 ) -white ( 96.95 , 3.76 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.133850 [log = -2.751813 ]- 96.952179 [log = -2.276304 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 6608(6608) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [500,2653] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.56498 mri =0.000 curv = 1.507 unmri = 1.536 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.51 , q= 3.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.51 , q= 3.01 ) 1499 patches have been generated - 1498 self-intersected max face = 6608(6656) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [500,2653] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.82302 mri =0.000 curv = 1.493 unmri = 2.851 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.99 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -4.70617 mri =0.000 curv = 1.542 unmri = -1.462 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.54 , q= 3.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.54 , q= 3.08 ) 1499 patches have been generated - 1497 self-intersected max face = 6608(6712) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [500,2653] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.04732 mri =0.000 curv = 1.540 unmri = -1.111 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.54 , q= 3.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.54 , q= 3.08 ) 1499 patches have been generated - 1497 self-intersected max face = 6608(6768) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [500,2653] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.75002 mri =0.000 curv = 1.551 unmri = -0.453 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.10 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -0.50100 mri =0.000 curv = 1.588 unmri = -5.852 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.18 ) 1499 patches have been generated - 1497 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.50100 # generated patches : 5996 (5989 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -782 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-782 (nv=391598, nf=784760, ne=1177140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 12 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 12!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -782 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-782 (nv=391598, nf=784760, ne=1177140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 13 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 13!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -782 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-782 (nv=391598, nf=784760, ne=1177140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 14 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 14: 49 vertices location: [ (179,111,55) - average intensity = 92.295 ] -gray ( 81.08 , 6.90 ) -white ( 95.63 , 2.63 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.077332 [log = -3.105442 ]- 95.629982 [log = -1.906129 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 77(77) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,41] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.85714 mri =0.000 curv = 2.733 unmri = -1.075 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.11463 mri =0.000 curv = 0.550 unmri = 1.913 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.10 ) 26 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.11463 # generated patches : 26 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -780 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-780 (nv=391626, nf=784812, ne=1177218) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 15 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 15!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -780 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-780 (nv=391626, nf=784812, ne=1177218) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 16 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 16!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -780 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-780 (nv=391626, nf=784812, ne=1177218) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 17 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 17: 55 vertices location: [ (214,125,58) - average intensity = 91.559 ] -gray ( 85.86 , 5.58 ) -white ( 98.19 , 3.16 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.860992 [log = -2.952928 ]- 98.189957 [log = -2.068110 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 85(85) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.07108 mri =0.000 curv = 0.692 unmri = -0.695 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.69 , q= 1.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.69 , q= 1.38 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.07077 mri =0.000 curv = 0.692 unmri = -0.695 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.69 , q= 1.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.69 , q= 1.38 ) 28 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.07077 # generated patches : 28 (0 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -778 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-778 (nv=391648, nf=784852, ne=1177278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 18 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 18: 453 vertices location: [ (215,112,63) - average intensity = 91.470 ] -gray ( 80.34 , 9.32 ) -white ( 98.29 , 3.64 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.341843 [log = -3.495794 ]- 98.292152 [log = -2.237337 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 829(829) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [125,342] 375 patches have been generated - 375 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 18 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -778 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-778 (nv=391648, nf=784852, ne=1177278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 19 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 19: 66 vertices location: [ (180,98,61) - average intensity = 91.691 ] -gray ( 85.70 , 5.57 ) -white ( 96.04 , 2.84 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.702927 [log = -2.907513 ]- 96.037544 [log = -1.968117 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 111(111) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,54] 54 patches have been generated - 54 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 19 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -778 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-778 (nv=391648, nf=784852, ne=1177278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 20 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 20: 83 vertices location: [ (220,128,67) - average intensity = 91.322 ] -gray ( 84.26 , 6.49 ) -white ( 96.40 , 3.18 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.262939 [log = -3.053179 ]- 96.398079 [log = -2.040078 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 138(138) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -72.14712 mri =0.000 curv = 18.164 unmri = -0.511 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=18.16 , q= 36.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=18.16 , q= 36.33 ) 44 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -72.14713 # generated patches : 44 (22 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -776 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-776 (nv=391670, nf=784892, ne=1177338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 21 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 21: 42 vertices location: [ (219,124,68) - average intensity = 89.410 ] -gray ( 81.13 , 6.28 ) -white ( 95.19 , 2.95 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.128159 [log = -2.779898 ]- 95.188255 [log = -1.976694 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 66(66) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,36] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.27198 mri =0.000 curv = 0.552 unmri = 0.064 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.10 ) 22 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.27198 # generated patches : 22 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -774 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-774 (nv=391692, nf=784932, ne=1177398) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 22 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 22!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -774 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-774 (nv=391692, nf=784932, ne=1177398) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 23 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 23: 728 vertices location: [ (224,179,73) - average intensity = 90.760 ] -gray ( 78.24 , 11.96 ) -white ( 99.55 , 4.71 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (78.242874 [log = -4.149322 ]- 99.545425 [log = -2.404120 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1347(1347) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [203,549] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.67568 mri =0.000 curv = 0.245 unmri = -0.304 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.25 , q= 0.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.25 , q= 0.49 ) 608 patches have been generated - 606 self-intersected max face = 1347(1403) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [203,549] BEST FITNESS (o)is -98.61560 mri =0.000 curv = 0.794 unmri = 95.439 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.79 , q= 1.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.79 , q= 1.59 ) 406 patches have been generated - 203 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -98.61560 # generated patches : 1014 (809 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -770 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-770 (nv=391858, nf=785256, ne=1177884) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 24 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 24!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -770 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-770 (nv=391858, nf=785256, ne=1177884) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 25 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 25!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -770 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-770 (nv=391858, nf=785256, ne=1177884) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 26 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 26: 202 vertices location: [ (216,189,75) - average intensity = 89.273 ] -gray ( 83.02 , 6.54 ) -white ( 96.11 , 3.12 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.021072 [log = -2.848892 ]- 96.108879 [log = -2.073824 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 382(382) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [58,163] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.46406 mri =0.000 curv = 2.987 unmri = 0.515 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.97 ) 116 patches have been generated - 58 self-intersected max face = 382(422) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [58,163] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.59875 mri =0.000 curv = 2.881 unmri = 2.074 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.59875 mri =0.000 curv = 2.881 unmri = 2.074 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) 116 patches have been generated - 58 self-intersected max face = 382(466) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [58,163] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.37469 mri =0.000 curv = 3.410 unmri = 0.737 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.41 , q= 6.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.41 , q= 6.82 ) 116 patches have been generated - 58 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.37469 # generated patches : 348 (174 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -764 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-764 (nv=391934, nf=785396, ne=1178094) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 27 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 27!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -764 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-764 (nv=391934, nf=785396, ne=1178094) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 28 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 28: 42 vertices location: [ (220,117,74) - average intensity = 91.438 ] -gray ( 87.73 , 2.93 ) -white ( 95.20 , 2.95 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.732742 [log = -1.961447 ]- 95.202286 [log = -2.062483 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 70(70) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -46.48324 mri =0.000 curv = 11.561 unmri = 0.240 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.56 , q= 23.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.56 , q= 23.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.68853 mri =0.000 curv = 1.528 unmri = 0.575 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.53 , q= 3.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.53 , q= 3.06 ) 24 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.68853 # generated patches : 24 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -762 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-762 (nv=391958, nf=785440, ne=1178160) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 29 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 29: 120 vertices location: [ (236,127,76) - average intensity = 90.910 ] -gray ( 82.45 , 6.68 ) -white ( 98.05 , 5.17 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.450493 [log = -3.162502 ]- 98.046913 [log = -2.423174 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 201(201) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [31,90] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.65115 mri =0.000 curv = 1.031 unmri = 2.526 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.06 ) 62 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.65115 # generated patches : 62 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -760 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-760 (nv=392000, nf=785520, ne=1178280) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 30 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 30: 198 vertices location: [ (235,140,76) - average intensity = 92.931 ] -gray ( 80.37 , 9.82 ) -white ( 99.19 , 4.34 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.367943 [log = -3.417945 ]- 99.190308 [log = -2.535268 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 337(337) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [52,145] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.31870 mri =0.000 curv = 0.419 unmri = 3.642 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.84 ) 104 patches have been generated - 52 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -5.31870 # generated patches : 104 (52 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -758 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-758 (nv=392028, nf=785572, ne=1178358) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 31 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 31!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -758 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-758 (nv=392028, nf=785572, ne=1178358) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 32 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 32: 866 vertices location: [ (228,109,84) - average intensity = 91.743 ] -gray ( 83.63 , 6.16 ) -white ( 97.98 , 4.03 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.629753 [log = -2.854330 ]- 97.977592 [log = -2.329082 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1601(1601) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [241,650] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.91020 mri =0.000 curv = 3.897 unmri = 9.321 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.90 , q= 7.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.90 , q= 7.79 ) 482 patches have been generated - 241 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -24.91020 # generated patches : 482 (241 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -756 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-756 (nv=392082, nf=785676, ne=1178514) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 33 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 33!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -756 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-756 (nv=392082, nf=785676, ne=1178514) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 34 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 34: 81 vertices location: [ (191,184,78) - average intensity = 92.103 ] -gray ( 87.08 , 2.95 ) -white ( 98.20 , 2.53 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.076820 [log = -2.064343 ]- 98.195747 [log = -1.845761 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 142(142) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [22,67] BEST FITNESS (o)is -31.57692 mri =0.000 curv = 8.185 unmri = -1.164 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.19 , q= 16.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.19 , q= 16.37 ) 44 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -31.57692 # generated patches : 44 (22 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -754 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-754 (nv=392104, nf=785716, ne=1178574) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 35 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 35: 102 vertices location: [ (228,152,81) - average intensity = 91.623 ] -gray ( 85.76 , 4.18 ) -white ( 97.39 , 3.35 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.764320 [log = -2.478217 ]- 97.385635 [log = -2.089848 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 169(169) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [26,78] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.31745 mri =0.000 curv = 0.564 unmri = 1.063 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.13 ) 52 patches have been generated - 25 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.31745 # generated patches : 52 (25 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -752 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-752 (nv=392136, nf=785776, ne=1178664) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 36 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 36: 209 vertices location: [ (232,121,83) - average intensity = 90.100 ] -gray ( 82.14 , 7.16 ) -white ( 96.75 , 3.46 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.140396 [log = -2.933939 ]- 96.754539 [log = -2.080455 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 369(369) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [56,158] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.24095 mri =0.000 curv = 1.495 unmri = 5.261 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.99 ) 112 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.24095 # generated patches : 112 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -750 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-750 (nv=392180, nf=785860, ne=1178790) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 37 with euler number -21 (11 loops) computing statistics for defect 37: 2080 vertices location: [ (240,180,98) - average intensity = 88.768 ] -gray ( 85.00 , 3.62 ) -white ( 99.76 , 4.13 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.003387 [log = -2.130467 ]- 99.762230 [log = -2.342675 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 4138(4138) - loop = 1 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.40246 mri =0.000 curv = 6.452 unmri = 0.595 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.45 , q= 12.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.45 , q= 12.90 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4178) - loop = 2 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.92995 mri =0.000 curv = 6.459 unmri = -0.906 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.46 , q= 12.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.46 , q= 12.92 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4218) - loop = 3 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.87555 mri =0.000 curv = 6.398 unmri = 2.283 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.40 , q= 12.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.40 , q= 12.80 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4258) - loop = 4 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.39800 mri =0.000 curv = 6.321 unmri = 5.115 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.32 , q= 12.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.32 , q= 12.64 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4306) - loop = 5 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -40.15044 mri =0.000 curv = 6.282 unmri = 15.021 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.28 , q= 12.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.28 , q= 12.56 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4358) - loop = 6 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -40.97279 mri =0.000 curv = 6.380 unmri = 15.453 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.38 , q= 12.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.38 , q= 12.76 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4414) - loop = 7 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -48.92083 mri =0.000 curv = 7.664 unmri = 18.267 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.66 , q= 15.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.66 , q= 15.33 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4466) - loop = 8 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -46.43784 mri =0.000 curv = 7.823 unmri = 15.146 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.82 , q= 15.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.82 , q= 15.65 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4526) - loop = 9 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -57.34947 mri =0.000 curv = 7.841 unmri = 25.985 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.84 , q= 15.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.84 , q= 15.68 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -44.12115 mri =0.000 curv = 8.325 unmri = 10.820 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.65 ) 362 patches have been generated - 180 self-intersected max face = 4138(4590) - loop = 10 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -51.36452 mri =0.000 curv = 8.233 unmri = 18.431 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.23 , q= 16.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.23 , q= 16.47 ) 362 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 4138(4662) - loop = 11 (11) - ntries = [181,1665] BEST FITNESS (o)is -60.00873 mri =0.000 curv = 8.163 unmri = 27.358 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.16 , q= 16.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.16 , q= 16.33 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -54.20502 mri =0.000 curv = 9.137 unmri = 17.657 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.14 , q= 18.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.14 , q= 18.27 ) 542 patches have been generated - 361 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -54.20502 # generated patches : 4162 (2170 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -728 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-728 (nv=392628, nf=786712, ne=1180068) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 38 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 38: 64 vertices location: [ (176,101,84) - average intensity = 91.519 ] -gray ( 86.87 , 4.02 ) -white ( 94.53 , 2.41 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.870934 [log = -2.373538 ]- 94.530685 [log = -1.830439 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 108(108) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [17,53] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.93125 mri =0.000 curv = 2.035 unmri = 0.791 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.04 , q= 4.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.04 , q= 4.07 ) 34 patches have been generated - 17 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -8.93125 # generated patches : 34 (17 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -726 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-726 (nv=392654, nf=786760, ne=1180140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 39 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 39: 85 vertices location: [ (178,112,87) - average intensity = 92.745 ] -gray ( 87.91 , 3.49 ) -white ( 94.85 , 2.71 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.914543 [log = -2.174039 ]- 94.845802 [log = -1.897262 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 143(143) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [22,67] BEST FITNESS (o)is -111.33590 mri =0.000 curv = 28.134 unmri = -1.201 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=28.13 , q= 56.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=28.13 , q= 56.27 ) 45 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -111.33590 # generated patches : 45 (24 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -724 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-724 (nv=392682, nf=786812, ne=1180218) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 40 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 40: 65 vertices location: [ (233,129,87) - average intensity = 93.382 ] -gray ( 86.53 , 6.80 ) -white ( 96.53 , 3.21 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.533279 [log = -2.637305 ]- 96.534271 [log = -2.199125 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 107(107) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [17,53] BEST FITNESS (o)is -473.03847 mri =0.000 curv = 118.218 unmri = 0.167 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=118.22 , q= 236.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=118.22 , q= 236.44 ) 50 patches have been generated - 49 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -473.03848 # generated patches : 50 (49 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -722 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-722 (nv=392704, nf=786852, ne=1180278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 41 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 41: 459 vertices location: [ (230,117,92) - average intensity = 93.297 ] -gray ( 85.55 , 9.38 ) -white ( 97.47 , 10.43 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.553932 [log = -2.490679 ]- 97.467140 [log = -2.514707 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 762(762) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [115,315] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.07356 mri =0.000 curv = 0.358 unmri = -0.359 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.36 , q= 0.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.36 , q= 0.72 ) 344 patches have been generated - 342 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.07356 # generated patches : 344 (342 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -720 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-720 (nv=392726, nf=786892, ne=1180338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 42 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 42: 53 vertices location: [ (176,111,90) - average intensity = 92.439 ] -gray ( 84.78 , 19.43 ) -white ( 90.91 , 20.71 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.784103 [log = -3.584872 ]- 90.909286 [log = -3.478355 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 87(87) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,45] BEST FITNESS (o)is -39.58582 mri =0.000 curv = 10.609 unmri = -2.852 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.61 , q= 21.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.61 , q= 21.22 ) 28 patches have been generated - 14 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -39.58582 # generated patches : 28 (14 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -718 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-718 (nv=392748, nf=786932, ne=1180398) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 43 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 43: 92 vertices location: [ (209,102,92) - average intensity = 90.580 ] -gray ( 82.61 , 5.36 ) -white ( 95.94 , 2.70 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.609077 [log = -2.649891 ]- 95.935730 [log = -1.912790 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 155(155) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [24,72] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.49660 mri =0.000 curv = 1.835 unmri = -0.843 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.67 ) 48 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.49660 # generated patches : 48 (24 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -716 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-716 (nv=392774, nf=786980, ne=1180470) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 44 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 44!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -716 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-716 (nv=392774, nf=786980, ne=1180470) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 45 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 45: 118 vertices location: [ (199,153,93) - average intensity = 92.396 ] -gray ( 83.84 , 5.10 ) -white ( 97.34 , 3.64 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.839508 [log = -2.527867 ]- 97.335197 [log = -2.087571 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 197(197) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [31,89] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.79594 mri =0.000 curv = 3.454 unmri = 4.980 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.45 , q= 6.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.45 , q= 6.91 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.00146 mri =0.000 curv = 2.496 unmri = 4.016 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.50 , q= 4.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.50 , q= 4.99 ) 62 patches have been generated - 31 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.00146 # generated patches : 62 (31 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -714 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-714 (nv=392810, nf=787048, ne=1180572) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 46 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 46: 384 vertices location: [ (246,123,97) - average intensity = 91.007 ] -gray ( 79.33 , 9.84 ) -white ( 100.52 , 4.56 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (79.331032 [log = -3.142249 ]- 100.524300 [log = -2.401707 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 694(694) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [105,288] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.77937 mri =0.000 curv = 0.790 unmri = 0.621 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.79 , q= 1.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.79 , q= 1.58 ) 210 patches have been generated - 105 self-intersected max face = 694(734) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [105,288] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.28910 mri =0.000 curv = 0.955 unmri = 2.467 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.91 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.08063 mri =0.000 curv = 0.810 unmri = 2.840 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.62 ) 210 patches have been generated - 104 self-intersected max face = 694(846) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [105,288] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.47619 mri =0.000 curv = 0.947 unmri = 4.688 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.95 , q= 1.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.95 , q= 1.89 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -7.78966 mri =0.000 curv = 2.160 unmri = -0.848 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.32 ) 210 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.78966 # generated patches : 630 (209 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -708 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-708 (nv=392916, nf=787248, ne=1180872) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 47 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 47: 85 vertices location: [ (177,134,95) - average intensity = 92.060 ] -gray ( 88.46 , 3.28 ) -white ( 95.09 , 3.02 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.463257 [log = -2.184122 ]- 95.093925 [log = -2.013760 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 148(148) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [23,69] BEST FITNESS (o)is -291.40094 mri =0.000 curv = 72.863 unmri = -0.051 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=72.86 , q= 145.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=72.86 , q= 145.73 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -227.95180 mri =0.000 curv = 56.899 unmri = 0.357 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=56.90 , q= 113.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=56.90 , q= 113.80 ) 46 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -227.95180 # generated patches : 46 (23 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -706 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-706 (nv=392938, nf=787288, ne=1180932) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 48 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 48!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -706 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-706 (nv=392938, nf=787288, ne=1180932) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 49 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 49: 259 vertices location: [ (205,103,96) - average intensity = 88.253 ] -gray ( 76.48 , 13.40 ) -white ( 94.29 , 15.22 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (76.476105 [log = -2.926385 ]- 94.294914 [log = -2.457053 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 470(470) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [72,198] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.03819 mri =0.000 curv = 1.138 unmri = -2.512 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.28 ) 145 patches have been generated - 74 self-intersected max face = 470(518) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [72,198] BEST FITNESS (o)is -79.73658 mri =0.000 curv = 10.558 unmri = 37.504 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.56 , q= 21.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.56 , q= 21.12 ) 145 patches have been generated - 74 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -79.73659 # generated patches : 290 (148 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -702 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-702 (nv=393038, nf=787480, ne=1181220) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 50 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 50: 82 vertices location: [ (177,123,96) - average intensity = 92.422 ] -gray ( 88.45 , 4.13 ) -white ( 96.89 , 3.65 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.452301 [log = -2.188859 ]- 96.885201 [log = -2.289515 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 136(136) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [21,64] BEST FITNESS (o)is -64.48095 mri =0.000 curv = 16.211 unmri = -0.365 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.21 , q= 32.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.21 , q= 32.42 ) 42 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -64.48096 # generated patches : 42 (21 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -700 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-700 (nv=393060, nf=787520, ne=1181280) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 51 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 51: 54 vertices location: [ (196,146,95) - average intensity = 89.574 ] -gray ( 87.03 , 3.96 ) -white ( 98.72 , 3.50 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.034248 [log = -2.015921 ]- 98.715500 [log = -2.270235 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 90(90) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.52581 mri =0.000 curv = 3.017 unmri = 1.456 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.07225 mri =0.000 curv = 1.044 unmri = -1.105 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.04 , q= 2.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.04 , q= 2.09 ) 30 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.07225 # generated patches : 30 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -698 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-698 (nv=393092, nf=787580, ne=1181370) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 52 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 52!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -698 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-698 (nv=393092, nf=787580, ne=1181370) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 53 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 53!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -698 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-698 (nv=393092, nf=787580, ne=1181370) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 54 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 54!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -698 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-698 (nv=393092, nf=787580, ne=1181370) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 55 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 55: 68 vertices location: [ (249,152,99) - average intensity = 93.224 ] -gray ( 80.77 , 9.00 ) -white ( 96.70 , 2.96 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.771378 [log = -3.876531 ]- 96.701485 [log = -2.059807 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 118(118) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [19,57] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.09245 mri =0.000 curv = 4.176 unmri = -1.612 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.18 , q= 8.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.18 , q= 8.35 ) 56 patches have been generated - 55 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -15.09245 # generated patches : 56 (55 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -696 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-696 (nv=393114, nf=787620, ne=1181430) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 56 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 56: 72 vertices location: [ (178,107,100) - average intensity = 92.809 ] -gray ( 87.89 , 3.29 ) -white ( 94.81 , 2.20 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.891624 [log = -2.078800 ]- 94.810158 [log = -1.729084 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 117(117) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [19,57] BEST FITNESS (o)is -29.77368 mri =0.000 curv = 7.990 unmri = -2.186 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.99 , q= 15.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.99 , q= 15.98 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.20214 mri =0.000 curv = 7.623 unmri = -2.289 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.62 , q= 15.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.62 , q= 15.25 ) 38 patches have been generated - 19 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -28.20214 # generated patches : 38 (19 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -694 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-694 (nv=393144, nf=787676, ne=1181514) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 57 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 57: 54 vertices location: [ (212,69,103) - average intensity = 92.222 ] -gray ( 86.45 , 5.23 ) -white ( 97.63 , 3.12 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.447105 [log = -2.707147 ]- 97.627640 [log = -2.118661 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 86(86) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -49.62998 mri =0.000 curv = 12.398 unmri = 0.040 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.40 , q= 24.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.40 , q= 24.80 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.61956 mri =0.000 curv = 2.609 unmri = 0.182 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.61 , q= 5.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.61 , q= 5.22 ) 28 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -10.61956 # generated patches : 28 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -692 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-692 (nv=393174, nf=787732, ne=1181598) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 58 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 58: 71 vertices location: [ (222,79,104) - average intensity = 91.499 ] -gray ( 85.11 , 5.74 ) -white ( 96.24 , 3.50 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.110344 [log = -2.748398 ]- 96.237175 [log = -2.169829 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 127(127) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [20,61] BEST FITNESS (o)is -23.59778 mri =0.000 curv = 6.053 unmri = -0.616 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.05 , q= 12.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.05 , q= 12.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.34768 mri =0.000 curv = 5.204 unmri = -0.469 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.20 , q= 10.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.20 , q= 10.41 ) 40 patches have been generated - 20 self-intersected max face = 127(175) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [20,61] BEST FITNESS (o)is -221.27081 mri =0.000 curv = 55.633 unmri = -1.260 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=55.63 , q= 111.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=55.63 , q= 111.27 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -36.28928 mri =0.000 curv = 9.258 unmri = -0.744 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.26 , q= 18.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.26 , q= 18.52 ) 40 patches have been generated - 20 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -36.28928 # generated patches : 80 (40 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -688 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-688 (nv=393230, nf=787836, ne=1181754) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 59 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 59: 40 vertices location: [ (179,103,103) - average intensity = 90.701 ] -gray ( 88.09 , 3.33 ) -white ( 93.62 , 2.31 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.090477 [log = -2.057659 ]- 93.618073 [log = -1.777074 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 62(62) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [10,35] BEST FITNESS (o)is -64.91912 mri =0.000 curv = 16.249 unmri = -0.077 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.25 , q= 32.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.25 , q= 32.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.15324 mri =0.000 curv = 0.544 unmri = 0.976 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.54 , q= 1.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.54 , q= 1.09 ) 20 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.15324 # generated patches : 20 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -686 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-686 (nv=393260, nf=787892, ne=1181838) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 60 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 60: 75 vertices location: [ (245,137,104) - average intensity = 87.889 ] -gray ( 81.09 , 8.73 ) -white ( 98.10 , 3.90 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.089508 [log = -4.008233 ]- 98.100845 [log = -2.380267 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 129(129) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [20,62] 60 patches have been generated - 60 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 60 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -686 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-686 (nv=393260, nf=787892, ne=1181838) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 61 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 61: 170 vertices location: [ (238,175,109) - average intensity = 91.575 ] -gray ( 83.69 , 3.83 ) -white ( 101.43 , 4.22 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.687866 [log = -2.305670 ]- 101.432426 [log = -2.299517 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 304(304) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.63209 mri =0.000 curv = 7.678 unmri = -0.082 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.68 , q= 15.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.68 , q= 15.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.63209 mri =0.000 curv = 7.678 unmri = -0.082 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.68 , q= 15.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.68 , q= 15.36 ) 94 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -30.63209 # generated patches : 94 (47 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -684 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-684 (nv=393290, nf=787948, ne=1181922) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 62 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 62: 88 vertices location: [ (204,93,107) - average intensity = 91.354 ] -gray ( 81.26 , 6.28 ) -white ( 96.33 , 3.62 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.256660 [log = -3.344444 ]- 96.333199 [log = -2.310356 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 149(149) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [23,70] BEST FITNESS (o)is -45.53941 mri =0.000 curv = 11.184 unmri = 0.802 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.18 , q= 22.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.18 , q= 22.37 ) 46 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -45.53941 # generated patches : 46 (23 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -682 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-682 (nv=393318, nf=788000, ne=1182000) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 63 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 63: 70 vertices location: [ (175,88,107) - average intensity = 90.495 ] -gray ( 88.57 , 3.92 ) -white ( 94.22 , 3.03 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.574852 [log = -1.979639 ]- 94.218483 [log = -2.059771 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 117(117) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [19,57] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.46724 mri =0.000 curv = 3.078 unmri = -1.846 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.08 , q= 6.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.08 , q= 6.16 ) 56 patches have been generated - 36 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -10.46724 # generated patches : 56 (36 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -680 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-680 (nv=393340, nf=788040, ne=1182060) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 64 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 64: 228 vertices location: [ (179,135,108) - average intensity = 95.679 ] -gray ( 87.76 , 6.92 ) -white ( 101.01 , 4.63 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.762238 [log = -2.833293 ]- 101.013725 [log = -2.558458 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 408(408) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [62,173] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.71188 mri =0.000 curv = 1.449 unmri = -0.085 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.45 , q= 2.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.45 , q= 2.90 ) 124 patches have been generated - 62 self-intersected max face = 408(448) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [62,173] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.11583 mri =0.000 curv = 7.659 unmri = -0.520 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.66 , q= 15.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.66 , q= 15.32 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.33938 mri =0.000 curv = 2.615 unmri = -1.123 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.23 ) 125 patches have been generated - 63 self-intersected max face = 408(520) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [62,173] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.93173 mri =0.000 curv = 3.824 unmri = -1.363 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.82 , q= 7.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.82 , q= 7.65 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.30085 mri =0.000 curv = 2.781 unmri = -2.823 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.56 ) 124 patches have been generated - 62 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -8.30085 # generated patches : 373 (187 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -674 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-674 (nv=393464, nf=788276, ne=1182414) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 65 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 65: 483 vertices location: [ (244,150,109) - average intensity = 90.832 ] -gray ( 80.31 , 7.98 ) -white ( 99.72 , 4.85 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.310463 [log = -2.887028 ]- 99.720749 [log = -2.459320 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 852(852) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [129,351] 387 patches have been generated - 387 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 65 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -674 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-674 (nv=393464, nf=788276, ne=1182414) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 66 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 66: 66 vertices location: [ (179,94,108) - average intensity = 92.622 ] -gray ( 88.71 , 3.79 ) -white ( 96.29 , 2.84 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.710999 [log = -2.088482 ]- 96.286995 [log = -1.966637 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 115(115) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,56] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.36775 mri =0.000 curv = 4.900 unmri = -1.231 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.90 , q= 9.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.90 , q= 9.80 ) 36 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -18.36775 # generated patches : 36 (18 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -672 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-672 (nv=393490, nf=788324, ne=1182486) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 67 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 67: 235 vertices location: [ (243,112,110) - average intensity = 91.956 ] -gray ( 84.26 , 6.27 ) -white ( 98.53 , 3.67 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.263733 [log = -2.967281 ]- 98.532036 [log = -2.280814 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 395(395) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [60,168] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.86171 mri =0.000 curv = 0.926 unmri = 1.159 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) 120 patches have been generated - 59 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.86171 # generated patches : 120 (59 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -670 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-670 (nv=393520, nf=788380, ne=1182570) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 68 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 68: 80 vertices location: [ (178,123,108) - average intensity = 95.220 ] -gray ( 89.62 , 4.57 ) -white ( 102.37 , 4.69 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.616600 [log = -2.383254 ]- 102.373047 [log = -2.953886 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 129(129) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [20,62] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.15807 mri =0.000 curv = 0.430 unmri = -1.561 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.43 , q= 0.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.43 , q= 0.86 ) 40 patches have been generated - 19 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.15807 # generated patches : 40 (19 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -668 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-668 (nv=393548, nf=788432, ne=1182648) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 69 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 69: 45 vertices location: [ (181,87,110) - average intensity = 90.205 ] -gray ( 86.46 , 6.38 ) -white ( 94.17 , 3.31 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.455284 [log = -3.325860 ]- 94.168999 [log = -2.015615 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 70(70) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.78137 mri =0.000 curv = 3.119 unmri = 0.305 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.12 , q= 6.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.12 , q= 6.24 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -12.78137 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -666 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-666 (nv=393570, nf=788472, ne=1182708) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 70 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 70: 80 vertices location: [ (178,119,111) - average intensity = 94.917 ] -gray ( 82.77 , 20.17 ) -white ( 96.06 , 23.48 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.774841 [log = -3.133269 ]- 96.056396 [log = -2.803283 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 137(137) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.57281 mri =0.000 curv = 0.533 unmri = 4.440 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.53 , q= 1.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.53 , q= 1.07 ) 44 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.57281 # generated patches : 44 (22 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -664 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-664 (nv=393596, nf=788520, ne=1182780) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 71 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 71!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -664 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-664 (nv=393596, nf=788520, ne=1182780) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 72 with euler number -37 (19 loops) computing statistics for defect 72: 5918 vertices location: [ (199,151,133) - average intensity = 75.668 ] -gray ( 74.23 , 17.44 ) -white ( 92.21 , 13.82 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (74.232941 [log = -4.253825 ]- 92.207108 [log = -3.461728 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 11437(11437) - loop = 1 (19) - ntries = [105,4585] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.22185 mri =0.000 curv = 1.908 unmri = 3.591 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.82 ) 211 patches have been generated - 107 self-intersected max face = 11437(11477) - loop = 2 (19) - ntries = [105,4585] BEST FITNESS (o)is -128.20997 mri =0.000 curv = 33.094 unmri = -4.166 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=33.09 , q= 66.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=33.09 , q= 66.19 ) 211 patches have been generated - 107 self-intersected max face = 11437(11549) - loop = 3 (19) - ntries = [105,4585] BEST FITNESS (o)is -103.02780 mri =0.000 curv = 32.952 unmri = -28.780 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=32.95 , q= 65.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=32.95 , q= 65.90 ) 211 patches have been generated - 107 self-intersected max face = 11437(11725) - loop = 4 (19) - ntries = [105,4585] 315 patches have been generated - 315 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 72 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -664 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-664 (nv=393596, nf=788520, ne=1182780) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 73 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 73!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -664 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-664 (nv=393596, nf=788520, ne=1182780) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 74 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 74: 43 vertices location: [ (189,84,112) - average intensity = 92.979 ] -gray ( 80.22 , 6.43 ) -white ( 95.72 , 3.15 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.217094 [log = -2.923051 ]- 95.722771 [log = -2.092323 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 67(67) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,37] BEST FITNESS (o)is -85.19492 mri =0.000 curv = 21.691 unmri = -1.571 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.69 , q= 43.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.69 , q= 43.38 ) 22 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -85.19492 # generated patches : 22 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -662 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-662 (nv=393618, nf=788560, ne=1182840) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 75 with euler number -23 (12 loops) computing statistics for defect 75: 8036 vertices location: [ (230,137,162) - average intensity = 93.274 ] -gray ( 82.55 , 5.63 ) -white ( 100.47 , 3.82 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.552017 [log = -2.790505 ]- 100.473907 [log = -2.268894 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 14747(14747) - loop = 1 (12) - ntries = [166,5909] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.71797 mri =0.000 curv = 3.563 unmri = -0.533 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.56 , q= 7.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.56 , q= 7.13 ) 333 patches have been generated - 168 self-intersected max face = 14747(14823) - loop = 2 (12) - ntries = [166,5909] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.24570 mri =0.000 curv = 3.722 unmri = -1.643 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.72 , q= 7.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.72 , q= 7.44 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -13.17464 mri =0.000 curv = 4.228 unmri = -3.736 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.23 , q= 8.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.23 , q= 8.46 ) 333 patches have been generated - 3 self-intersected max face = 14747(14883) - loop = 3 (12) - ntries = [166,5909] 498 patches have been generated - 498 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 75 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -662 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-662 (nv=393618, nf=788560, ne=1182840) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 76 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 76: 368 vertices location: [ (176,112,120) - average intensity = 95.405 ] -gray ( 85.48 , 17.09 ) -white ( 97.19 , 19.00 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.480881 [log = -2.893116 ]- 97.191124 [log = -2.674121 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 688(688) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [104,285] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.04921 mri =0.000 curv = 4.387 unmri = -5.499 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.39 , q= 8.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.39 , q= 8.77 ) 209 patches have been generated - 106 self-intersected max face = 688(752) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [104,285] BEST FITNESS (o)is -146.71098 mri =0.000 curv = 39.347 unmri = -10.676 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=39.35 , q= 78.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=39.35 , q= 78.69 ) 209 patches have been generated - 106 self-intersected max face = 688(860) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [104,285] BEST FITNESS (M) is -592.47324 mri =0.000 curv = 153.569 unmri = -21.804 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=153.57 , q= 307.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=153.57 , q= 307.14 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -255.69654 mri =0.000 curv = 69.646 unmri = -22.888 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=69.65 , q= 139.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=69.65 , q= 139.29 ) 209 patches have been generated - 105 self-intersected max face = 688(1024) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [104,285] BEST FITNESS (o)is -262.86199 mri =0.000 curv = 72.115 unmri = -25.598 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=72.11 , q= 144.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=72.11 , q= 144.23 ) 208 patches have been generated - 104 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -262.86200 # generated patches : 835 (421 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -654 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-654 (nv=393820, nf=788948, ne=1183422) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 77 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 77: 95 vertices location: [ (246,123,114) - average intensity = 89.963 ] -gray ( 83.73 , 6.98 ) -white ( 97.02 , 3.59 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.733017 [log = -2.762842 ]- 97.016441 [log = -2.274729 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 154(154) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [24,72] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.85740 mri =0.000 curv = 4.209 unmri = -0.980 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.21 , q= 8.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.21 , q= 8.42 ) 48 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -15.85740 # generated patches : 48 (24 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -652 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-652 (nv=393850, nf=789004, ne=1183506) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 78 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 78: 81 vertices location: [ (247,118,116) - average intensity = 91.333 ] -gray ( 82.81 , 7.86 ) -white ( 98.48 , 3.97 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.810585 [log = -3.290287 ]- 98.475510 [log = -2.373391 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 135(135) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [21,64] BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.96889 mri =0.000 curv = 5.154 unmri = 0.355 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.15 , q= 10.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.15 , q= 10.31 ) 42 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -20.96889 # generated patches : 42 (21 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -650 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-650 (nv=393872, nf=789044, ne=1183566) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 79 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 79: 249 vertices location: [ (181,154,125) - average intensity = 93.681 ] -gray ( 86.41 , 3.77 ) -white ( 96.95 , 2.95 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.412689 [log = -2.236196 ]- 96.948921 [log = -1.923318 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 460(460) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [70,194] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.36951 mri =0.000 curv = 1.811 unmri = 0.127 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.62 ) 140 patches have been generated - 69 self-intersected max face = 460(500) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [70,194] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.76908 mri =0.000 curv = 2.622 unmri = 8.279 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.42059 mri =0.000 curv = 2.636 unmri = 6.878 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.27 ) 140 patches have been generated - 70 self-intersected max face = 460(556) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [70,194] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.87122 mri =0.000 curv = 2.908 unmri = 7.240 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.91 , q= 5.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.91 , q= 5.82 ) 140 patches have been generated - 69 self-intersected max face = 460(612) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [70,194] BEST FITNESS (o)is -19.36683 mri =0.000 curv = 2.810 unmri = 8.129 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.81 , q= 5.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.81 , q= 5.62 ) 209 patches have been generated - 207 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -19.36683 # generated patches : 629 (415 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -642 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-642 (nv=393988, nf=789260, ne=1183890) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 80 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 80!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -642 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-642 (nv=393988, nf=789260, ne=1183890) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 81 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 81!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -642 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-642 (nv=393988, nf=789260, ne=1183890) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 82 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 82: 207 vertices location: [ (249,158,125) - average intensity = 91.627 ] -gray ( 81.60 , 4.88 ) -white ( 100.44 , 4.38 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.597733 [log = -2.307027 ]- 100.439590 [log = -2.307745 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 381(381) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [58,162] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.06287 mri =0.000 curv = 1.661 unmri = 0.419 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.32 ) 116 patches have been generated - 57 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.06287 # generated patches : 116 (57 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -640 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-640 (nv=394014, nf=789308, ne=1183962) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 83 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 83: 299 vertices location: [ (172,100,125) - average intensity = 91.897 ] -gray ( 88.80 , 3.84 ) -white ( 96.98 , 3.93 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.798546 [log = -2.152985 ]- 96.975250 [log = -2.227208 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 538(538) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [82,225] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.56857 mri =0.000 curv = 1.115 unmri = 0.109 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.23 ) 164 patches have been generated - 81 self-intersected max face = 538(582) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [82,225] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.52827 mri =0.000 curv = 1.791 unmri = -0.635 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.79 , q= 3.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.79 , q= 3.58 ) 164 patches have been generated - 82 self-intersected max face = 538(630) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [82,225] BEST FITNESS (o)is -183.28875 mri =0.000 curv = 46.157 unmri = -1.339 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=46.16 , q= 92.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=46.16 , q= 92.31 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.46896 mri =0.000 curv = 4.391 unmri = -5.094 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.39 , q= 8.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.39 , q= 8.78 ) 164 patches have been generated - 82 self-intersected max face = 538(698) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [82,225] BEST FITNESS (o)is -169.55822 mri =0.000 curv = 43.839 unmri = -5.799 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=43.84 , q= 87.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=43.84 , q= 87.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.24652 mri =0.000 curv = 5.042 unmri = -3.920 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.04 , q= 10.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.04 , q= 10.08 ) 164 patches have been generated - 82 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -16.24652 # generated patches : 656 (327 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -632 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-632 (nv=394144, nf=789552, ne=1184328) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 84 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 84: 65 vertices location: [ (173,101,120) - average intensity = 91.335 ] -gray ( 89.46 , 2.44 ) -white ( 96.63 , 3.53 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.463707 [log = -1.826769 ]- 96.627571 [log = -2.306765 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 111(111) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [18,54] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.26166 mri =0.000 curv = 1.565 unmri = -0.998 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.57 , q= 3.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.57 , q= 3.13 ) 36 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected max face = 111(151) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [18,54] BEST FITNESS (o)is -53.14222 mri =0.000 curv = 14.027 unmri = -2.965 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.03 , q= 28.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.03 , q= 28.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.09909 mri =0.000 curv = 1.058 unmri = -0.134 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.06 , q= 2.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.06 , q= 2.12 ) 36 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.09909 # generated patches : 72 (36 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -628 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-628 (nv=394192, nf=789640, ne=1184460) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 85 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 85!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -628 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-628 (nv=394192, nf=789640, ne=1184460) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 86 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 86!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -628 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-628 (nv=394192, nf=789640, ne=1184460) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 87 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 87: 68 vertices location: [ (252,107,124) - average intensity = 91.394 ] -gray ( 84.14 , 6.00 ) -white ( 95.77 , 3.25 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.136818 [log = -2.891745 ]- 95.774895 [log = -2.143989 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 116(116) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,56] BEST FITNESS (o)is -44.10784 mri =0.000 curv = 11.231 unmri = -0.816 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.23 , q= 22.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.23 , q= 22.46 ) 36 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -44.10784 # generated patches : 36 (18 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -626 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-626 (nv=394214, nf=789680, ne=1184520) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 88 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 88: 55 vertices location: [ (248,167,123) - average intensity = 92.478 ] -gray ( 80.57 , 8.23 ) -white ( 100.81 , 5.91 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.571861 [log = -2.903109 ]- 100.813980 [log = -3.005523 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 90(90) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.90034 mri =0.000 curv = 1.091 unmri = -0.465 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.18 ) 30 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.90034 # generated patches : 30 (0 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -624 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-624 (nv=394236, nf=789720, ne=1184580) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 89 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 89: 56 vertices location: [ (182,93,125) - average intensity = 91.257 ] -gray ( 87.95 , 4.38 ) -white ( 94.54 , 2.85 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.951363 [log = -2.427872 ]- 94.543419 [log = -1.990033 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 92(92) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,47] BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.66496 mri =0.000 curv = 4.218 unmri = -0.207 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.22 , q= 8.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.22 , q= 8.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.02301 mri =0.000 curv = 3.448 unmri = -0.768 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.45 , q= 6.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.45 , q= 6.90 ) 30 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -13.02301 # generated patches : 30 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -622 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-622 (nv=394270, nf=789784, ne=1184676) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 90 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 90!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -622 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-622 (nv=394270, nf=789784, ne=1184676) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 91 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 91!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -622 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-622 (nv=394270, nf=789784, ne=1184676) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 92 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 92!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -622 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-622 (nv=394270, nf=789784, ne=1184676) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 93 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 93: 78 vertices location: [ (245,170,126) - average intensity = 91.538 ] -gray ( 76.86 , 15.77 ) -white ( 100.37 , 18.43 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (76.860168 [log = -3.621702 ]- 100.368225 [log = -3.032519 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 124(124) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [20,60] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.14299 mri =0.000 curv = 0.545 unmri = -1.038 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.09 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.11365 mri =0.000 curv = 0.538 unmri = -1.038 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.54 , q= 1.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.54 , q= 1.08 ) 40 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.11365 # generated patches : 40 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -620 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-620 (nv=394296, nf=789832, ne=1184748) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 94 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 94: 122 vertices location: [ (246,104,129) - average intensity = 90.909 ] -gray ( 86.31 , 5.23 ) -white ( 98.32 , 4.40 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.308990 [log = -2.489401 ]- 98.322372 [log = -2.599468 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 206(206) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [32,92] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.02923 mri =0.000 curv = 0.818 unmri = 0.758 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.82 , q= 1.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.82 , q= 1.64 ) 64 patches have been generated - 32 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.02923 # generated patches : 64 (32 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -618 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-618 (nv=394330, nf=789896, ne=1184844) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 95 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 95: 255 vertices location: [ (182,88,132) - average intensity = 90.872 ] -gray ( 85.59 , 4.79 ) -white ( 95.32 , 3.16 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.589340 [log = -2.494058 ]- 95.319931 [log = -2.084222 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 413(413) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [63,175] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.88967 mri =0.000 curv = 0.417 unmri = 1.221 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.83 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.87514 mri =0.000 curv = 0.412 unmri = 1.228 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.41 , q= 0.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.41 , q= 0.82 ) 126 patches have been generated - 63 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.87514 # generated patches : 126 (63 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -616 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-616 (nv=394356, nf=789944, ne=1184916) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 96 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 96!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -616 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-616 (nv=394356, nf=789944, ne=1184916) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 97 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 97: 478 vertices location: [ (232,174,133) - average intensity = 86.071 ] -gray ( 73.45 , 6.41 ) -white ( 97.84 , 4.30 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (73.451004 [log = -3.028784 ]- 97.837944 [log = -2.391920 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 853(853) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [129,351] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.93116 mri =0.000 curv = 0.734 unmri = -1.004 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.73 , q= 1.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.73 , q= 1.47 ) 258 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected max face = 853(893) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [129,351] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.20712 mri =0.000 curv = 0.680 unmri = -1.511 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.68 , q= 1.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.68 , q= 1.36 ) 258 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected max face = 853(941) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [129,351] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.23982 mri =0.000 curv = 1.059 unmri = 0.005 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.06 , q= 2.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.06 , q= 2.12 ) 258 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.23982 # generated patches : 774 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -610 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-610 (nv=394446, nf=790112, ne=1185168) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 98 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 98: 59 vertices location: [ (184,91,129) - average intensity = 91.184 ] -gray ( 80.60 , 23.37 ) -white ( 86.44 , 24.60 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.601486 [log = -3.973211 ]- 86.438248 [log = -7.060239 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 100(100) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [16,50] BEST FITNESS (o)is -193.43699 mri =0.000 curv = 49.890 unmri = -6.124 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=49.89 , q= 99.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=49.89 , q= 99.78 ) 32 patches have been generated - 16 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -193.43700 # generated patches : 32 (16 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -608 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-608 (nv=394468, nf=790152, ne=1185228) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 99 with euler number -9 (5 loops) computing statistics for defect 99: 310 vertices location: [ (171,94,135) - average intensity = 92.307 ] -gray ( 88.10 , 3.74 ) -white ( 96.42 , 3.69 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.104973 [log = -2.204586 ]- 96.423714 [log = -2.190706 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 556(556) - loop = 1 (5) - ntries = [84,232] BEST FITNESS (o)is -45.56143 mri =0.000 curv = 11.730 unmri = -1.357 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.73 , q= 23.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.73 , q= 23.46 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.63923 mri =0.000 curv = 3.314 unmri = 2.383 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.63 ) 168 patches have been generated - 84 self-intersected max face = 556(612) - loop = 2 (5) - ntries = [84,232] BEST FITNESS (o)is -43.82201 mri =0.000 curv = 10.699 unmri = 1.026 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.70 , q= 21.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.70 , q= 21.40 ) 251 patches have been generated - 250 self-intersected max face = 556(652) - loop = 3 (5) - ntries = [84,232] BEST FITNESS (o)is -45.02657 mri =0.000 curv = 10.630 unmri = 2.507 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.63 , q= 21.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.63 , q= 21.26 ) 251 patches have been generated - 250 self-intersected max face = 556(692) - loop = 4 (5) - ntries = [84,232] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1062.77821 mri =0.000 curv = 263.776 unmri = 7.675 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=263.78 , q= 527.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=263.78 , q= 527.55 ) 251 patches have been generated - 250 self-intersected max face = 556(752) - loop = 5 (5) - ntries = [84,232] BEST FITNESS (o)is -982.33245 mri =0.000 curv = 243.757 unmri = 7.304 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=243.76 , q= 487.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=243.76 , q= 487.51 ) 251 patches have been generated - 250 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -982.33246 # generated patches : 1172 (1084 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -598 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-598 (nv=394602, nf=790400, ne=1185600) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 100 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 100: 236 vertices location: [ (173,103,134) - average intensity = 94.627 ] -gray ( 83.09 , 20.51 ) -white ( 94.13 , 23.27 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.092209 [log = -3.290812 ]- 94.127815 [log = -2.925575 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 431(431) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [66,182] BEST FITNESS (o)is -71.03985 mri =0.000 curv = 17.484 unmri = 1.105 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.48 , q= 34.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.48 , q= 34.97 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -65.89580 mri =0.000 curv = 15.730 unmri = 2.976 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=15.73 , q= 31.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=15.73 , q= 31.46 ) 132 patches have been generated - 66 self-intersected max face = 431(487) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [66,182] BEST FITNESS (o)is -47.16877 mri =0.000 curv = 13.964 unmri = -8.687 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.96 , q= 27.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.96 , q= 27.93 ) 132 patches have been generated - 66 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -47.16877 # generated patches : 264 (132 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -594 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-594 (nv=394666, nf=790520, ne=1185780) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 101 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 101!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -594 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-594 (nv=394666, nf=790520, ne=1185780) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 102 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 102: 1026 vertices location: [ (222,127,141) - average intensity = 93.647 ] -gray ( 86.89 , 3.45 ) -white ( 100.75 , 3.63 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.885315 [log = -2.166432 ]- 100.749809 [log = -2.220632 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1801(1801) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [271,730] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.14584 mri =0.000 curv = 1.677 unmri = -4.562 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.68 , q= 3.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.68 , q= 3.35 ) 542 patches have been generated - 271 self-intersected max face = 1801(1841) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [271,730] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.26591 mri =0.000 curv = 1.617 unmri = -2.203 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.23 ) 542 patches have been generated - 271 self-intersected max face = 1801(1881) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [271,730] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.15785 mri =0.000 curv = 1.633 unmri = -1.373 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.63 , q= 3.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.63 , q= 3.27 ) 542 patches have been generated - 270 self-intersected max face = 1801(1929) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [271,730] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.82284 mri =0.000 curv = 2.619 unmri = -4.653 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) 542 patches have been generated - 270 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -5.82284 # generated patches : 2168 (1082 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -586 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-586 (nv=394770, nf=790712, ne=1186068) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 103 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 103: 517 vertices location: [ (242,164,136) - average intensity = 90.437 ] -gray ( 75.02 , 10.39 ) -white ( 100.68 , 9.08 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (75.020134 [log = -3.265227 ]- 100.678581 [log = -2.700575 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 900(900) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [136,370] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.10655 mri =0.000 curv = 0.718 unmri = 1.235 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.72 , q= 1.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.72 , q= 1.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.49389 mri =0.000 curv = 0.622 unmri = 0.008 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.62 , q= 1.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.62 , q= 1.24 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -0.64036 mri =0.000 curv = 1.764 unmri = -6.415 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.76 , q= 3.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.76 , q= 3.53 ) 272 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected max face = 900(956) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [136,370] BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.85377 mri =0.000 curv = 1.873 unmri = 9.361 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.87 , q= 3.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.87 , q= 3.75 ) 272 patches have been generated - 136 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -16.85377 # generated patches : 544 (136 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -582 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-582 (nv=394858, nf=790880, ne=1186320) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 104 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 104!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -582 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-582 (nv=394858, nf=790880, ne=1186320) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 105 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 105!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -582 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-582 (nv=394858, nf=790880, ne=1186320) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 106 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 106: 151 vertices location: [ (233,164,138) - average intensity = 87.656 ] -gray ( 71.94 , 5.02 ) -white ( 98.71 , 3.29 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (71.944992 [log = -2.561872 ]- 98.709747 [log = -2.108345 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 257(257) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [40,113] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.91306 mri =0.000 curv = 0.445 unmri = -0.868 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.29525 mri =0.000 curv = 0.310 unmri = -0.946 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.31 , q= 0.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.31 , q= 0.62 ) 80 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected max face = 257(325) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [40,113] BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.45867 mri =0.000 curv = 0.339 unmri = -1.814 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.34 , q= 0.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.34 , q= 0.68 ) 80 patches have been generated - 40 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 0.45867 # generated patches : 160 (41 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -578 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-578 (nv=394916, nf=790988, ne=1186482) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 107 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 107: 104 vertices location: [ (177,86,138) - average intensity = 92.015 ] -gray ( 85.93 , 4.40 ) -white ( 93.30 , 2.97 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.928383 [log = -2.413706 ]- 93.297737 [log = -1.955445 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 177(177) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [28,81] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.92104 mri =0.000 curv = 3.476 unmri = -1.985 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.48 , q= 6.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.48 , q= 6.95 ) 56 patches have been generated - 28 self-intersected max face = 177(217) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [28,81] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.20894 mri =0.000 curv = 5.249 unmri = -6.785 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.25 , q= 10.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.25 , q= 10.50 ) 56 patches have been generated - 28 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.20894 # generated patches : 112 (56 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -574 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-574 (nv=394968, nf=791084, ne=1186626) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 108 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 108!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -574 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-574 (nv=394968, nf=791084, ne=1186626) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 109 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 109!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -574 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-574 (nv=394968, nf=791084, ne=1186626) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 110 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 110!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -574 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-574 (nv=394968, nf=791084, ne=1186626) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 111 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 111: 112 vertices location: [ (182,57,144) - average intensity = 92.435 ] -gray ( 86.02 , 5.62 ) -white ( 95.96 , 3.46 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.018677 [log = -2.956690 ]- 95.959961 [log = -2.216901 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 204(204) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [32,92] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.41662 mri =0.000 curv = 2.940 unmri = -0.345 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) 64 patches have been generated - 31 self-intersected max face = 204(244) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [32,92] BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.99271 mri =0.000 curv = 5.493 unmri = -0.979 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.49 , q= 10.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.49 , q= 10.99 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.73802 mri =0.000 curv = 4.341 unmri = 0.372 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.34 , q= 8.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.34 , q= 8.68 ) 64 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected max face = 204(300) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [32,92] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.70322 mri =0.000 curv = 6.237 unmri = -0.246 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.24 , q= 12.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.24 , q= 12.47 ) 64 patches have been generated - 32 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -24.70322 # generated patches : 192 (64 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -568 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-568 (nv=395042, nf=791220, ne=1186830) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 112 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 112: 45 vertices location: [ (180,85,143) - average intensity = 91.444 ] -gray ( 82.34 , 17.07 ) -white ( 90.59 , 18.38 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.339027 [log = -2.981350 ]- 90.592697 [log = -2.511524 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 75(75) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,40] BEST FITNESS (o)is -143.29889 mri =0.000 curv = 35.350 unmri = 1.897 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=35.35 , q= 70.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=35.35 , q= 70.70 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -78.04673 mri =0.000 curv = 21.408 unmri = -7.587 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.41 , q= 42.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.41 , q= 42.82 ) 24 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -78.04672 # generated patches : 24 (0 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -566 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-566 (nv=395068, nf=791268, ne=1186902) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 113 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 113: 69 vertices location: [ (248,112,144) - average intensity = 92.655 ] -gray ( 86.21 , 7.01 ) -white ( 98.89 , 4.61 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.206284 [log = -2.744302 ]- 98.885361 [log = -2.752524 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 114(114) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,56] BEST FITNESS (o)is -105.04466 mri =0.000 curv = 26.174 unmri = 0.349 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=26.17 , q= 52.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=26.17 , q= 52.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -100.43401 mri =0.000 curv = 25.201 unmri = -0.370 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=25.20 , q= 50.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=25.20 , q= 50.40 ) 36 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -100.43401 # generated patches : 36 (0 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -564 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-564 (nv=395098, nf=791324, ne=1186986) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 114 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 114!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -564 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-564 (nv=395098, nf=791324, ne=1186986) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 115 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 115: 176 vertices location: [ (221,175,147) - average intensity = 89.834 ] -gray ( 72.84 , 6.55 ) -white ( 99.56 , 4.37 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (72.837502 [log = -2.493214 ]- 99.559563 [log = -2.486968 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 312(312) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [48,135] BEST FITNESS (o)is -23.48552 mri =0.000 curv = 5.652 unmri = 0.878 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.65 , q= 11.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.65 , q= 11.30 ) 96 patches have been generated - 48 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -23.48552 # generated patches : 96 (48 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -562 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-562 (nv=395120, nf=791364, ne=1187046) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 116 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 116: 749 vertices location: [ (195,173,157) - average intensity = 89.043 ] -gray ( 83.64 , 4.44 ) -white ( 95.89 , 3.86 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.635330 [log = -2.434083 ]- 95.890709 [log = -2.162579 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1431(1431) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [216,582] BEST FITNESS (o)is -90.88841 mri =0.000 curv = 23.780 unmri = -4.230 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=23.78 , q= 47.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=23.78 , q= 47.56 ) 432 patches have been generated - 216 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -90.88840 # generated patches : 432 (216 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -560 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-560 (nv=395150, nf=791420, ne=1187130) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 117 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 117: 97 vertices location: [ (169,55,148) - average intensity = 93.025 ] -gray ( 86.78 , 5.71 ) -white ( 96.68 , 2.95 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.778694 [log = -2.843569 ]- 96.678688 [log = -2.093200 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 162(162) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.18699 mri =0.000 curv = 8.443 unmri = -0.583 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.44 , q= 16.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.44 , q= 16.89 ) 50 patches have been generated - 25 self-intersected max face = 162(202) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.16942 mri =0.000 curv = 7.376 unmri = -2.337 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.38 , q= 14.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.38 , q= 14.75 ) 50 patches have been generated - 25 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -27.16942 # generated patches : 100 (50 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -556 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-556 (nv=395198, nf=791508, ne=1187262) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 118 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 118!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -556 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-556 (nv=395198, nf=791508, ne=1187262) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 119 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 119: 172 vertices location: [ (170,97,150) - average intensity = 95.222 ] -gray ( 92.51 , 9.42 ) -white ( 104.35 , 6.40 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (92.508911 [log = -2.817151 ]- 104.352013 [log = -3.227009 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 304(304) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is -40.58557 mri =0.000 curv = 9.170 unmri = 3.905 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.17 , q= 18.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.17 , q= 18.34 ) 94 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected max face = 304(344) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is -45.03069 mri =0.000 curv = 8.003 unmri = 13.019 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.00 , q= 16.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.00 , q= 16.01 ) 94 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -45.03069 # generated patches : 188 (94 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -552 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-552 (nv=395258, nf=791620, ne=1187430) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 120 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 120: 51 vertices location: [ (250,103,149) - average intensity = 90.929 ] -gray ( 86.35 , 4.81 ) -white ( 96.35 , 4.53 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.346611 [log = -2.288442 ]- 96.345779 [log = -2.592992 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 82(82) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,43] BEST FITNESS (o)is -53.14830 mri =0.000 curv = 13.059 unmri = 0.911 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.06 , q= 26.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.06 , q= 26.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -48.07999 mri =0.000 curv = 11.792 unmri = 0.913 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.79 , q= 23.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.79 , q= 23.58 ) 26 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -48.07999 # generated patches : 26 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -550 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-550 (nv=395284, nf=791668, ne=1187502) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 121 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 121: 77 vertices location: [ (168,83,152) - average intensity = 91.210 ] -gray ( 88.16 , 4.07 ) -white ( 96.13 , 4.10 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.160683 [log = -2.122056 ]- 96.131859 [log = -2.530954 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 138(138) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.27074 mri =0.000 curv = 1.738 unmri = 0.320 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.74 , q= 3.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.74 , q= 3.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.59092 mri =0.000 curv = 0.955 unmri = -0.230 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.91 ) 44 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected max face = 138(178) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -636.68172 mri =0.000 curv = 159.093 unmri = 0.311 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=159.09 , q= 318.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=159.09 , q= 318.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -399.56416 mri =0.000 curv = 99.868 unmri = 0.092 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=99.87 , q= 199.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=99.87 , q= 199.74 ) 65 patches have been generated - 43 self-intersected max face = 138(434) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -361.59816 mri =0.000 curv = 90.117 unmri = 1.131 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=90.12 , q= 180.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=90.12 , q= 180.23 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -360.22126 mri =0.000 curv = 90.110 unmri = -0.219 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=90.11 , q= 180.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=90.11 , q= 180.22 ) 44 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -360.22125 # generated patches : 153 (87 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -544 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-544 (nv=395458, nf=792004, ne=1188006) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 122 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 122: 118 vertices location: [ (180,48,154) - average intensity = 93.462 ] -gray ( 89.00 , 5.10 ) -white ( 97.29 , 3.47 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.002159 [log = -2.633385 ]- 97.287285 [log = -2.228839 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 214(214) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [33,96] BEST FITNESS (o)is -31.76854 mri =0.000 curv = 8.028 unmri = -0.344 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.03 , q= 16.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.03 , q= 16.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.88518 mri =0.000 curv = 3.320 unmri = -0.394 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) 66 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected max face = 214(270) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [33,96] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.85802 mri =0.000 curv = 7.899 unmri = -0.738 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.90 , q= 15.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.90 , q= 15.80 ) 66 patches have been generated - 33 self-intersected max face = 214(310) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [33,96] BEST FITNESS (o)is -32.32323 mri =0.000 curv = 8.259 unmri = -0.711 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.26 , q= 16.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.26 , q= 16.52 ) 66 patches have been generated - 33 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -32.32323 # generated patches : 198 (67 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -538 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-538 (nv=395534, nf=792144, ne=1188216) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 123 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 123: 77 vertices location: [ (175,70,154) - average intensity = 92.086 ] -gray ( 85.92 , 5.25 ) -white ( 97.01 , 2.95 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.915138 [log = -2.677707 ]- 97.014015 [log = -2.015677 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 130(130) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [21,62] BEST FITNESS (o)is -37.48967 mri =0.000 curv = 7.963 unmri = 5.637 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.96 , q= 15.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.96 , q= 15.93 ) 42 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -37.48967 # generated patches : 42 (21 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -536 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-536 (nv=395564, nf=792200, ne=1188300) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 124 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 124: 390 vertices location: [ (169,93,159) - average intensity = 95.702 ] -gray ( 92.82 , 13.15 ) -white ( 101.29 , 13.90 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (92.822502 [log = -2.635106 ]- 101.290665 [log = -2.797499 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 724(724) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [110,300] BEST FITNESS (o)is -37.17310 mri =0.000 curv = 9.186 unmri = 0.428 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.19 , q= 18.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.19 , q= 18.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.34023 mri =0.000 curv = 7.709 unmri = 2.503 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.71 , q= 15.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.71 , q= 15.42 ) 220 patches have been generated - 110 self-intersected max face = 724(768) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [110,300] BEST FITNESS (o)is -39.41426 mri =0.000 curv = 9.121 unmri = 2.931 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.12 , q= 18.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.12 , q= 18.24 ) 220 patches have been generated - 110 self-intersected max face = 724(808) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [110,300] BEST FITNESS (o)is -39.61723 mri =0.000 curv = 8.369 unmri = 6.143 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.37 , q= 16.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.37 , q= 16.74 ) 220 patches have been generated - 110 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -39.61723 # generated patches : 660 (330 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -530 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-530 (nv=395648, nf=792356, ne=1188534) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 125 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 125: 52 vertices location: [ (171,69,158) - average intensity = 92.586 ] -gray ( 77.44 , 20.12 ) -white ( 91.11 , 22.28 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (77.444405 [log = -3.199213 ]- 91.105110 [log = -3.825934 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 90(90) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -48.48499 mri =0.000 curv = 12.847 unmri = -2.904 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.85 , q= 25.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.85 , q= 25.69 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -42.21566 mri =0.000 curv = 11.445 unmri = -3.564 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.44 , q= 22.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.44 , q= 22.89 ) 30 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -42.21566 # generated patches : 30 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -528 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-528 (nv=395674, nf=792404, ne=1188606) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 126 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 126!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -528 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-528 (nv=395674, nf=792404, ne=1188606) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 127 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 127: 377 vertices location: [ (246,115,165) - average intensity = 89.996 ] -gray ( 83.37 , 7.03 ) -white ( 96.51 , 3.73 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.372360 [log = -2.648984 ]- 96.509972 [log = -2.323102 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 728(728) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [110,301] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.45339 mri =0.000 curv = 2.970 unmri = 2.572 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.97 , q= 5.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.97 , q= 5.94 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.62402 mri =0.000 curv = 3.201 unmri = -0.178 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.20 , q= 6.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.20 , q= 6.40 ) 220 patches have been generated - 109 self-intersected max face = 728(784) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [110,301] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.04031 mri =0.000 curv = 3.099 unmri = -0.357 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.10 , q= 6.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.10 , q= 6.20 ) 220 patches have been generated - 110 self-intersected max face = 728(844) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [110,301] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.86367 mri =0.000 curv = 2.961 unmri = 0.020 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -10.42877 mri =0.000 curv = 4.435 unmri = -7.312 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.44 , q= 8.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.44 , q= 8.87 ) 220 patches have been generated - 109 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -10.42877 # generated patches : 660 (328 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -522 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-522 (nv=395762, nf=792568, ne=1188852) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 128 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 128: 316 vertices location: [ (249,144,162) - average intensity = 90.874 ] -gray ( 82.09 , 5.70 ) -white ( 99.40 , 4.78 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.090004 [log = -2.624783 ]- 99.398224 [log = -2.465012 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 573(573) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [87,239] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.20727 mri =0.000 curv = 1.207 unmri = 1.378 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.41 ) 174 patches have been generated - 87 self-intersected max face = 573(637) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [87,239] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.48794 mri =0.000 curv = 3.888 unmri = 8.935 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.89 , q= 7.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.89 , q= 7.78 ) 174 patches have been generated - 87 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -24.48794 # generated patches : 348 (174 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -518 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-518 (nv=395830, nf=792696, ne=1189044) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 129 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 129!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -518 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-518 (nv=395830, nf=792696, ne=1189044) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 130 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 130: 51 vertices location: [ (211,60,158) - average intensity = 92.096 ] -gray ( 82.11 , 8.13 ) -white ( 96.41 , 3.81 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.114998 [log = -3.985489 ]- 96.408669 [log = -2.423216 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 86(86) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -91.03110 mri =0.000 curv = 22.878 unmri = -0.481 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=22.88 , q= 45.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=22.88 , q= 45.76 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.81302 mri =0.000 curv = 1.608 unmri = 1.381 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.61 , q= 3.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.61 , q= 3.22 ) 28 patches have been generated - 14 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.81302 # generated patches : 28 (14 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -516 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-516 (nv=395860, nf=792752, ne=1189128) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 131 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 131: 164 vertices location: [ (247,157,160) - average intensity = 92.817 ] -gray ( 82.69 , 6.67 ) -white ( 102.98 , 4.87 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.693581 [log = -2.388337 ]- 102.980797 [log = -2.487621 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 305(305) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.45375 mri =0.000 curv = 4.136 unmri = -0.090 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.14 , q= 8.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.14 , q= 8.27 ) 94 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected max face = 305(353) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.89304 mri =0.000 curv = 4.075 unmri = -0.406 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.07 , q= 8.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.07 , q= 8.15 ) 94 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -15.89304 # generated patches : 188 (48 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -512 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-512 (nv=395912, nf=792848, ne=1189272) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 132 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 132: 38 vertices location: [ (195,45,160) - average intensity = 91.910 ] -gray ( 79.74 , 9.44 ) -white ( 96.14 , 2.93 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (79.739960 [log = -3.769613 ]- 96.135262 [log = -2.028728 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 61(61) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [10,34] BEST FITNESS (o)is -302.34183 mri =0.000 curv = 75.829 unmri = -0.975 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=75.83 , q= 151.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=75.83 , q= 151.66 ) 20 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -302.34183 # generated patches : 20 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -510 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-510 (nv=395934, nf=792888, ne=1189332) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 133 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 133: 42 vertices location: [ (189,46,161) - average intensity = 92.880 ] -gray ( 84.37 , 7.16 ) -white ( 95.68 , 2.77 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.368805 [log = -3.292577 ]- 95.677513 [log = -2.006916 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 69(69) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -65.96216 mri =0.000 curv = 16.261 unmri = 0.917 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.26 , q= 32.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.26 , q= 32.52 ) 22 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -65.96217 # generated patches : 22 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 134 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 134!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 135 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 135!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 136 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 136!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 137 with euler number -77 (39 loops) computing statistics for defect 137: 3159 vertices location: [ (201,155,177) - average intensity = 92.125 ] -gray ( 85.07 , 7.47 ) -white ( 96.80 , 4.64 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.071770 [log = -2.903238 ]- 96.803467 [log = -2.416990 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 6129(6129) - loop = 1 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -31.51324 mri =0.000 curv = 8.093 unmri = -0.861 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.09 , q= 16.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.09 , q= 16.19 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6169) - loop = 2 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -32.99023 mri =0.000 curv = 8.217 unmri = 0.124 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.22 , q= 16.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.22 , q= 16.43 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6209) - loop = 3 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.97814 mri =0.000 curv = 8.186 unmri = 1.234 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.19 , q= 16.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.19 , q= 16.37 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -27.01598 mri =0.000 curv = 8.250 unmri = -5.984 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.25 , q= 16.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.25 , q= 16.50 ) 102 patches have been generated - 50 self-intersected max face = 6129(6249) - loop = 4 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.91802 mri =0.000 curv = 8.244 unmri = -7.057 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.24 , q= 16.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.24 , q= 16.49 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6289) - loop = 5 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.90514 mri =0.000 curv = 8.179 unmri = -5.810 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.18 , q= 16.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.18 , q= 16.36 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6329) - loop = 6 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.73919 mri =0.000 curv = 8.325 unmri = -4.561 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.65 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6369) - loop = 7 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -29.52341 mri =0.000 curv = 8.287 unmri = -3.624 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.29 , q= 16.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.29 , q= 16.57 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6409) - loop = 8 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.09027 mri =0.000 curv = 8.229 unmri = -5.826 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.23 , q= 16.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.23 , q= 16.46 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -19.78495 mri =0.000 curv = 8.386 unmri = -13.760 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.39 , q= 16.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.39 , q= 16.77 ) 102 patches have been generated - 50 self-intersected max face = 6129(6449) - loop = 9 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -19.97155 mri =0.000 curv = 8.361 unmri = -13.474 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.36 , q= 16.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.36 , q= 16.72 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6489) - loop = 10 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.16495 mri =0.000 curv = 8.329 unmri = -15.151 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.66 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6537) - loop = 11 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.68207 mri =0.000 curv = 8.299 unmri = -17.514 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.30 , q= 16.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.30 , q= 16.60 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6577) - loop = 12 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.15597 mri =0.000 curv = 8.385 unmri = -18.385 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.39 , q= 16.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.39 , q= 16.77 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6629) - loop = 13 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.70025 mri =0.000 curv = 8.332 unmri = -17.627 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.66 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6681) - loop = 14 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.19065 mri =0.000 curv = 8.262 unmri = -15.856 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.26 , q= 16.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.26 , q= 16.52 ) 102 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected max face = 6129(6733) - loop = 15 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.90021 mri =0.000 curv = 8.195 unmri = -15.881 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.20 , q= 16.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.20 , q= 16.39 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -14.83539 mri =0.000 curv = 8.704 unmri = -19.980 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.70 , q= 17.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.70 , q= 17.41 ) 102 patches have been generated - 50 self-intersected max face = 6129(6781) - loop = 16 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.45559 mri =0.000 curv = 8.848 unmri = -9.938 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.85 , q= 17.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.85 , q= 17.70 ) 103 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 6129(6889) - loop = 17 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -22.64817 mri =0.000 curv = 8.791 unmri = -12.517 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.79 , q= 17.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.79 , q= 17.58 ) 103 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 6129(6945) - loop = 18 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.61262 mri =0.000 curv = 9.132 unmri = -7.913 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.13 , q= 18.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.13 , q= 18.26 ) 103 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 6129(7013) - loop = 19 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -62.28121 mri =0.000 curv = 16.949 unmri = -5.516 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.95 , q= 33.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.95 , q= 33.90 ) 153 patches have been generated - 103 self-intersected max face = 6129(7357) - loop = 20 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -70.13042 mri =0.000 curv = 16.820 unmri = 2.851 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.82 , q= 33.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.82 , q= 33.64 ) 103 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 6129(7433) - loop = 21 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -76.89177 mri =0.000 curv = 16.907 unmri = 9.264 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.91 , q= 33.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.91 , q= 33.81 ) 103 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 6129(7525) - loop = 22 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -74.33145 mri =0.000 curv = 16.785 unmri = 7.190 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.79 , q= 33.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.79 , q= 33.57 ) 103 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 6129(7585) - loop = 23 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -81.43586 mri =0.000 curv = 16.679 unmri = 14.721 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.68 , q= 33.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.68 , q= 33.36 ) 152 patches have been generated - 151 self-intersected max face = 6129(7633) - loop = 24 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -86.84989 mri =0.000 curv = 16.563 unmri = 20.600 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.56 , q= 33.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.56 , q= 33.13 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -78.57947 mri =0.000 curv = 16.668 unmri = 11.908 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.67 , q= 33.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.67 , q= 33.34 ) 152 patches have been generated - 150 self-intersected max face = 6129(7689) - loop = 25 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] BEST FITNESS (o)is -80.93967 mri =0.000 curv = 16.551 unmri = 14.735 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.55 , q= 33.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.55 , q= 33.10 ) 152 patches have been generated - 151 self-intersected max face = 6129(7741) - loop = 26 (39) - ntries = [51,2462] 153 patches have been generated - 153 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 137 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 138 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 138!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 139 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 139!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -508 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-508 (nv=395956, nf=792928, ne=1189392) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 140 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 140: 70 vertices location: [ (186,160,167) - average intensity = 86.823 ] -gray ( 80.55 , 10.99 ) -white ( 98.69 , 12.13 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.551193 [log = -3.444020 ]- 98.689308 [log = -3.594837 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 115(115) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,56] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.35504 mri =0.000 curv = 3.739 unmri = 3.399 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.74 , q= 7.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.74 , q= 7.48 ) 36 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -18.35504 # generated patches : 36 (18 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -506 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-506 (nv=395982, nf=792976, ne=1189464) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 141 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 141: 56 vertices location: [ (168,81,166) - average intensity = 91.564 ] -gray ( 83.63 , 6.38 ) -white ( 95.45 , 2.71 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.630264 [log = -2.982286 ]- 95.450012 [log = -1.913786 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 88(88) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,45] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.30558 mri =0.000 curv = 0.573 unmri = 1.014 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.57 , q= 1.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.57 , q= 1.15 ) 28 patches have been generated - 14 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.30558 # generated patches : 28 (14 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -504 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-504 (nv=396008, nf=793024, ne=1189536) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 142 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 142: 45 vertices location: [ (166,85,166) - average intensity = 92.122 ] -gray ( 83.81 , 20.53 ) -white ( 90.18 , 21.56 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.807343 [log = -4.460106 ]- 90.184937 [log = -3.885305 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 69(69) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.20444 mri =0.000 curv = 1.924 unmri = 5.508 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.92 , q= 3.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.92 , q= 3.85 ) 22 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -13.20444 # generated patches : 22 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -502 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-502 (nv=396030, nf=793064, ne=1189596) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 143 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 143!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -502 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-502 (nv=396030, nf=793064, ne=1189596) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 144 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 144: 34 vertices location: [ (204,155,166) - average intensity = 90.036 ] -gray ( 83.07 , 7.92 ) -white ( 97.98 , 5.09 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.067757 [log = -3.379486 ]- 97.983940 [log = -2.708235 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 54(54) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [9,32] BEST FITNESS (o)is -76.60266 mri =0.000 curv = 19.276 unmri = -0.503 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=19.28 , q= 38.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=19.28 , q= 38.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.26817 mri =0.000 curv = 2.487 unmri = 0.319 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.49 , q= 4.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.49 , q= 4.97 ) 18 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -10.26817 # generated patches : 18 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -500 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-500 (nv=396052, nf=793104, ne=1189656) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 145 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 145: 56 vertices location: [ (168,62,167) - average intensity = 91.484 ] -gray ( 83.99 , 8.03 ) -white ( 95.07 , 2.30 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.994591 [log = -3.361991 ]- 95.068916 [log = -1.757596 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 95(95) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,48] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.53734 mri =0.000 curv = 8.697 unmri = -1.252 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.70 , q= 17.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.70 , q= 17.39 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.36143 mri =0.000 curv = 8.653 unmri = -1.252 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.65 , q= 17.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.65 , q= 17.31 ) 30 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -33.36143 # generated patches : 30 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -498 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-498 (nv=396074, nf=793144, ne=1189716) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 146 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 146!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -498 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-498 (nv=396074, nf=793144, ne=1189716) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 147 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 147: 49 vertices location: [ (163,121,168) - average intensity = 85.111 ] -gray ( 86.12 , 18.10 ) -white ( 74.41 , 20.85 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.123604 [log = -4.864625 ]- 74.413773 [log = -4.892440 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 79(79) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,42] BEST FITNESS (o)is -191.11015 mri =0.000 curv = 47.150 unmri = 2.510 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=47.15 , q= 94.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=47.15 , q= 94.30 ) 38 patches have been generated - 37 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -191.11015 # generated patches : 38 (37 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -496 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-496 (nv=396096, nf=793184, ne=1189776) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 148 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 148!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -496 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-496 (nv=396096, nf=793184, ne=1189776) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 149 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 149!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -496 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-496 (nv=396096, nf=793184, ne=1189776) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 150 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 150: 51 vertices location: [ (242,121,169) - average intensity = 89.171 ] -gray ( 82.05 , 4.87 ) -white ( 96.47 , 3.27 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.045166 [log = -2.587114 ]- 96.470108 [log = -2.182975 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 77(77) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,41] BEST FITNESS (o)is -65.88734 mri =0.000 curv = 16.559 unmri = -0.350 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.56 , q= 33.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.56 , q= 33.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -51.50297 mri =0.000 curv = 12.963 unmri = -0.350 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.96 , q= 25.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.96 , q= 25.93 ) 26 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -51.50297 # generated patches : 26 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -494 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-494 (nv=396118, nf=793224, ne=1189836) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 151 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 151!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -494 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-494 (nv=396118, nf=793224, ne=1189836) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 152 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 152: 179 vertices location: [ (242,164,173) - average intensity = 90.870 ] -gray ( 79.13 , 7.86 ) -white ( 100.31 , 4.30 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (79.132500 [log = -3.002336 ]- 100.309692 [log = -2.424549 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 333(333) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [51,143] BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.46060 mri =0.000 curv = 5.350 unmri = 0.059 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.35 , q= 10.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.35 , q= 10.70 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -11.52424 mri =0.000 curv = 3.213 unmri = -1.329 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.43 ) 102 patches have been generated - 50 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.52424 # generated patches : 102 (50 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -492 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-492 (nv=396148, nf=793280, ne=1189920) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 153 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 153: 40 vertices location: [ (190,167,169) - average intensity = 87.855 ] -gray ( 84.51 , 4.40 ) -white ( 92.73 , 4.63 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.508255 [log = -2.563134 ]- 92.730080 [log = -2.562186 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 65(65) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,36] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.94117 mri =0.000 curv = 3.484 unmri = 0.006 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.48 , q= 6.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.48 , q= 6.97 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.34829 mri =0.000 curv = 2.622 unmri = -0.140 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) 22 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -10.34829 # generated patches : 22 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=396174, nf=793328, ne=1189992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 154 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 154!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=396174, nf=793328, ne=1189992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 155 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 155!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=396174, nf=793328, ne=1189992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 156 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 156!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=396174, nf=793328, ne=1189992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 157 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 157!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=396174, nf=793328, ne=1189992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 158 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 158!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=396174, nf=793328, ne=1189992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 159 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 159: 42 vertices location: [ (199,152,171) - average intensity = 93.585 ] -gray ( 88.87 , 6.64 ) -white ( 95.71 , 2.78 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.874702 [log = -2.386049 ]- 95.714218 [log = -1.963671 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 67(67) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,37] BEST FITNESS (o)is -71.41882 mri =0.000 curv = 17.351 unmri = 2.015 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.35 , q= 34.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.35 , q= 34.70 ) 22 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -71.41882 # generated patches : 22 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -488 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-488 (nv=396196, nf=793368, ne=1190052) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 160 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 160!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -488 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-488 (nv=396196, nf=793368, ne=1190052) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 161 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 161!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -488 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-488 (nv=396196, nf=793368, ne=1190052) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 162 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 162: 89 vertices location: [ (185,49,176) - average intensity = 93.516 ] -gray ( 87.32 , 7.04 ) -white ( 96.67 , 3.28 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.322800 [log = -3.393797 ]- 96.670486 [log = -2.164506 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 147(147) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [23,69] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.77730 mri =0.000 curv = 8.807 unmri = -1.450 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.81 , q= 17.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.81 , q= 17.61 ) 46 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -33.77730 # generated patches : 46 (23 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -486 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-486 (nv=396218, nf=793408, ne=1190112) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 163 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 163!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -486 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-486 (nv=396218, nf=793408, ne=1190112) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 164 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 164: 50 vertices location: [ (167,95,175) - average intensity = 95.358 ] -gray ( 96.89 , 7.22 ) -white ( 104.73 , 4.02 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (96.887405 [log = -2.814940 ]- 104.731323 [log = -2.198047 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 85(85) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -160.55147 mri =0.000 curv = 41.446 unmri = -5.233 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=41.45 , q= 82.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=41.45 , q= 82.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -126.45634 mri =0.000 curv = 33.193 unmri = -6.315 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=33.19 , q= 66.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=33.19 , q= 66.39 ) 28 patches have been generated - 14 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -126.45634 # generated patches : 28 (14 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -484 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-484 (nv=396248, nf=793464, ne=1190196) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 165 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 165: 49 vertices location: [ (216,100,175) - average intensity = 89.308 ] -gray ( 84.92 , 8.25 ) -white ( 91.08 , 17.94 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.923225 [log = -2.693600 ]- 91.077698 [log = -5.153333 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 73(73) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,39] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.24801 mri =0.000 curv = 1.974 unmri = -2.648 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.97 , q= 3.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.97 , q= 3.95 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -5.24801 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -482 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-482 (nv=396270, nf=793504, ne=1190256) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 166 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 166: 55 vertices location: [ (215,127,175) - average intensity = 92.548 ] -gray ( 88.63 , 2.61 ) -white ( 98.95 , 3.86 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.627785 [log = -1.901459 ]- 98.945976 [log = -2.197747 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 89(89) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,46] 42 patches have been generated - 42 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 166 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -482 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-482 (nv=396270, nf=793504, ne=1190256) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 167 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 167!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -482 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-482 (nv=396270, nf=793504, ne=1190256) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 168 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 168!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -482 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-482 (nv=396270, nf=793504, ne=1190256) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 169 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 169: 69 vertices location: [ (233,88,177) - average intensity = 93.165 ] -gray ( 89.98 , 3.16 ) -white ( 100.38 , 3.47 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.982925 [log = -1.909803 ]- 100.379494 [log = -2.190811 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 113(113) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,55] BEST FITNESS (o)is -115.42994 mri =0.000 curv = 28.526 unmri = 1.326 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=28.53 , q= 57.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=28.53 , q= 57.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -111.08441 mri =0.000 curv = 27.525 unmri = 0.983 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=27.53 , q= 55.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=27.53 , q= 55.05 ) 36 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -111.08440 # generated patches : 36 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -480 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-480 (nv=396296, nf=793552, ne=1190328) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 170 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 170: 42 vertices location: [ (180,150,178) - average intensity = 104.681 ] -gray ( 99.99 , 35.16 ) -white ( 108.16 , 31.59 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (99.991890 [log = -4.629543 ]- 108.158890 [log = -3.919816 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 69(69) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.14635 mri =0.000 curv = 7.917 unmri = 1.479 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.92 , q= 15.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.92 , q= 15.83 ) 32 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -33.14635 # generated patches : 32 (21 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -478 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-478 (nv=396318, nf=793592, ne=1190388) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 171 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 171: 233 vertices location: [ (188,49,184) - average intensity = 91.709 ] -gray ( 84.05 , 15.18 ) -white ( 94.61 , 15.20 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.054504 [log = -4.305565 ]- 94.608513 [log = -2.273760 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 418(418) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [64,177] BEST FITNESS (o)is -81.14597 mri =0.000 curv = 20.940 unmri = -2.615 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=20.94 , q= 41.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=20.94 , q= 41.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -71.78261 mri =0.000 curv = 18.712 unmri = -3.064 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=18.71 , q= 37.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=18.71 , q= 37.42 ) 128 patches have been generated - 64 self-intersected max face = 418(474) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [64,177] BEST FITNESS (o)is -51.34417 mri =0.000 curv = 16.209 unmri = -13.494 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.21 , q= 32.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.21 , q= 32.42 ) 128 patches have been generated - 64 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -51.34417 # generated patches : 256 (128 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -474 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-474 (nv=396386, nf=793720, ne=1190580) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 172 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 172!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -474 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-474 (nv=396386, nf=793720, ne=1190580) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 173 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 173!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -474 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-474 (nv=396386, nf=793720, ne=1190580) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 174 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 174: 57 vertices location: [ (234,89,183) - average intensity = 93.427 ] -gray ( 84.58 , 19.29 ) -white ( 95.92 , 21.87 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.584946 [log = -3.249762 ]- 95.923279 [log = -3.447783 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 94(94) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,48] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.95772 mri =0.000 curv = 4.019 unmri = -1.119 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.02 , q= 8.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.02 , q= 8.04 ) 30 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.95772 # generated patches : 30 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -472 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-472 (nv=396408, nf=793760, ne=1190640) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 175 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 175!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -472 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-472 (nv=396408, nf=793760, ne=1190640) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 176 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 176: 152 vertices location: [ (167,84,185) - average intensity = 92.657 ] -gray ( 87.66 , 4.88 ) -white ( 95.64 , 3.87 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.657272 [log = -2.233902 ]- 95.641678 [log = -2.417246 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 246(246) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [38,108] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.09360 mri =0.000 curv = 2.878 unmri = -0.419 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) 76 patches have been generated - 38 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.09360 # generated patches : 76 (38 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -470 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-470 (nv=396432, nf=793804, ne=1190706) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 177 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 177!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -470 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-470 (nv=396432, nf=793804, ne=1190706) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 178 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 178!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -470 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-470 (nv=396432, nf=793804, ne=1190706) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 179 with euler number -53 (27 loops) computing statistics for defect 179: 6444 vertices location: [ (213,130,204) - average intensity = 92.683 ] -gray ( 86.10 , 7.51 ) -white ( 100.41 , 5.03 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.098869 [log = -2.550699 ]- 100.413353 [log = -2.502499 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 12361(12361) - loop = 1 (27) - ntries = [74,4954] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.18722 mri =0.000 curv = 3.012 unmri = -2.862 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) 149 patches have been generated - 76 self-intersected max face = 12361(12453) - loop = 2 (27) - ntries = [74,4954] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.02803 mri =0.000 curv = 3.031 unmri = -3.097 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.06 ) 149 patches have been generated - 76 self-intersected max face = 12361(12505) - loop = 3 (27) - ntries = [74,4954] 222 patches have been generated - 222 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 179 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -470 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-470 (nv=396432, nf=793804, ne=1190706) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 180 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 180!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -470 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-470 (nv=396432, nf=793804, ne=1190706) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 181 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 181: 239 vertices location: [ (198,148,189) - average intensity = 98.720 ] -gray ( 83.84 , 10.20 ) -white ( 98.18 , 3.49 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.842773 [log = -3.752597 ]- 98.183365 [log = -2.169439 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 435(435) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [66,184] BEST FITNESS (o)is -45.83429 mri =0.000 curv = 10.688 unmri = 3.083 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.69 , q= 21.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.69 , q= 21.38 ) 132 patches have been generated - 66 self-intersected max face = 435(475) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [66,184] BEST FITNESS (o)is -51.46852 mri =0.000 curv = 10.661 unmri = 8.823 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.66 , q= 21.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.66 , q= 21.32 ) 132 patches have been generated - 66 self-intersected max face = 435(515) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [66,184] BEST FITNESS (o)is -83.67238 mri =0.000 curv = 16.693 unmri = 16.899 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.69 , q= 33.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.69 , q= 33.39 ) 132 patches have been generated - 66 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -83.67238 # generated patches : 396 (198 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -464 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-464 (nv=396500, nf=793928, ne=1190892) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 182 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 182: 165 vertices location: [ (184,49,190) - average intensity = 90.560 ] -gray ( 81.80 , 20.51 ) -white ( 92.45 , 21.87 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.797287 [log = -5.086053 ]- 92.445824 [log = -3.518779 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 298(298) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.37964 mri =0.000 curv = 2.679 unmri = 1.664 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.34907 mri =0.000 curv = 3.026 unmri = -1.757 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.05 ) 92 patches have been generated - 46 self-intersected max face = 298(358) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.90484 mri =0.000 curv = 2.680 unmri = -8.814 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.36 ) 92 patches have been generated - 46 self-intersected max face = 298(406) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.88794 mri =0.000 curv = 4.374 unmri = -13.607 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.37 , q= 8.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.37 , q= 8.75 ) 92 patches have been generated - 46 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.88794 # generated patches : 276 (138 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -458 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-458 (nv=396586, nf=794088, ne=1191132) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 183 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 183: 44 vertices location: [ (163,90,187) - average intensity = 92.193 ] -gray ( 88.75 , 3.50 ) -white ( 95.64 , 4.29 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.753296 [log = -2.105070 ]- 95.642311 [log = -2.570935 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 72(72) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,39] BEST FITNESS (o)is -50.92773 mri =0.000 curv = 12.763 unmri = -0.126 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.76 , q= 25.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.76 , q= 25.53 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.22564 mri =0.000 curv = 2.511 unmri = 1.181 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.02 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.22564 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -456 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-456 (nv=396616, nf=794144, ne=1191216) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 184 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 184!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -456 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-456 (nv=396616, nf=794144, ne=1191216) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 185 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 185!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -456 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-456 (nv=396616, nf=794144, ne=1191216) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 186 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 186!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -456 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-456 (nv=396616, nf=794144, ne=1191216) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 187 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 187!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -456 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-456 (nv=396616, nf=794144, ne=1191216) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 188 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 188: 175 vertices location: [ (162,99,192) - average intensity = 100.052 ] -gray ( 98.20 , 8.86 ) -white ( 107.84 , 4.70 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (98.195374 [log = -4.737276 ]- 107.843864 [log = -2.126248 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 323(323) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [49,139] BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.69000 mri =0.000 curv = 3.832 unmri = 6.362 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.83 , q= 7.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.83 , q= 7.66 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.36579 mri =0.000 curv = 3.749 unmri = 6.370 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.75 , q= 7.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.75 , q= 7.50 ) 98 patches have been generated - 49 self-intersected max face = 323(363) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [49,139] BEST FITNESS (o)is -255.25127 mri =0.000 curv = 61.467 unmri = 9.384 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=61.47 , q= 122.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=61.47 , q= 122.93 ) 146 patches have been generated - 145 self-intersected max face = 323(403) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [49,139] BEST FITNESS (o)is -233.51829 mri =0.000 curv = 54.833 unmri = 14.187 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=54.83 , q= 109.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=54.83 , q= 109.67 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -233.51725 mri =0.000 curv = 54.833 unmri = 14.186 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=54.83 , q= 109.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=54.83 , q= 109.67 ) 98 patches have been generated - 49 self-intersected max face = 323(443) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [49,139] BEST FITNESS (o)is -220.31470 mri =0.000 curv = 49.399 unmri = 22.718 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=49.40 , q= 98.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=49.40 , q= 98.80 ) 98 patches have been generated - 49 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -220.31470 # generated patches : 440 (292 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -448 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-448 (nv=396704, nf=794304, ne=1191456) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 189 with euler number -15 (8 loops) computing statistics for defect 189: 739 vertices location: [ (203,157,196) - average intensity = 90.627 ] -gray ( 85.95 , 4.64 ) -white ( 98.49 , 3.58 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.950027 [log = -2.619713 ]- 98.490868 [log = -2.220232 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1416(1416) - loop = 1 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.67652 mri =0.000 curv = 2.394 unmri = 1.102 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.02236 mri =0.000 curv = 2.389 unmri = 0.467 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -7.09125 mri =0.000 curv = 3.008 unmri = -4.941 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) 426 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected max face = 1416(1464) - loop = 2 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.75724 mri =0.000 curv = 2.900 unmri = -3.845 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.80 ) 426 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected max face = 1416(1516) - loop = 3 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.55316 mri =0.000 curv = 3.194 unmri = -5.222 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.19 , q= 6.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.19 , q= 6.39 ) 638 patches have been generated - 637 self-intersected max face = 1416(1564) - loop = 4 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.13858 mri =0.000 curv = 3.079 unmri = -2.179 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.08 , q= 6.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.08 , q= 6.16 ) 638 patches have been generated - 637 self-intersected max face = 1416(1612) - loop = 5 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.29575 mri =0.000 curv = 3.355 unmri = -1.125 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.36 , q= 6.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.36 , q= 6.71 ) 638 patches have been generated - 637 self-intersected max face = 1416(1664) - loop = 6 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.10558 mri =0.000 curv = 3.255 unmri = -0.915 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.26 , q= 6.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.26 , q= 6.51 ) 426 patches have been generated - 213 self-intersected max face = 1416(1720) - loop = 7 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.11866 mri =0.000 curv = 3.126 unmri = 3.615 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.13 , q= 6.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.13 , q= 6.25 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.60246 mri =0.000 curv = 3.425 unmri = 0.904 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.42 , q= 6.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.42 , q= 6.85 ) 426 patches have been generated - 213 self-intersected max face = 1416(1828) - loop = 8 (8) - ntries = [213,576] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.80922 mri =0.000 curv = 3.299 unmri = 5.614 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.60 ) 426 patches have been generated - 213 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -18.80922 # generated patches : 4044 (2551 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -432 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-432 (nv=396960, nf=794784, ne=1192176) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 190 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 190!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -432 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-432 (nv=396960, nf=794784, ne=1192176) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 191 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 191: 171 vertices location: [ (181,150,195) - average intensity = 91.156 ] -gray ( 81.84 , 11.02 ) -white ( 96.77 , 3.44 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (81.844429 [log = -3.214468 ]- 96.767113 [log = -2.195693 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 294(294) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [45,128] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.89964 mri =0.000 curv = 1.703 unmri = 5.087 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.70 , q= 3.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.70 , q= 3.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.68069 mri =0.000 curv = 1.647 unmri = 5.092 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.65 , q= 3.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.65 , q= 3.29 ) 90 patches have been generated - 44 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.68069 # generated patches : 90 (44 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -430 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-430 (nv=396996, nf=794852, ne=1192278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 192 with euler number -75 (38 loops) computing statistics for defect 192: 5722 vertices location: [ (164,105,223) - average intensity = 96.004 ] -gray ( 88.22 , 4.35 ) -white ( 98.18 , 4.37 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.219276 [log = -2.136821 ]- 98.183952 [log = -2.533928 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 10768(10768) - loop = 1 (38) - ntries = [52,4317] BEST FITNESS (o)is -23.99769 mri =0.000 curv = 3.598 unmri = 9.604 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.60 , q= 7.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.60 , q= 7.20 ) 105 patches have been generated - 54 self-intersected max face = 10768(10824) - loop = 2 (38) - ntries = [52,4317] 156 patches have been generated - 156 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 192 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -430 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-430 (nv=396996, nf=794852, ne=1192278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 193 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 193!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -430 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-430 (nv=396996, nf=794852, ne=1192278) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 194 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 194: 44 vertices location: [ (166,138,197) - average intensity = 95.236 ] -gray ( 90.58 , 4.75 ) -white ( 97.51 , 2.73 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (90.576546 [log = -2.424036 ]- 97.507584 [log = -1.934084 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 67(67) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,37] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.68596 mri =0.000 curv = 1.908 unmri = 0.053 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.82 ) 22 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.68596 # generated patches : 22 (0 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -428 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-428 (nv=397018, nf=794892, ne=1192338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 195 with euler number -11 (6 loops) computing statistics for defect 195: 986 vertices location: [ (212,150,210) - average intensity = 90.417 ] -gray ( 84.00 , 3.79 ) -white ( 101.49 , 3.63 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.999947 [log = -2.315156 ]- 101.490021 [log = -2.182345 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1921(1921) - loop = 1 (6) - ntries = [289,778] BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.11983 mri =0.000 curv = 4.134 unmri = 0.583 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.13 , q= 8.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.13 , q= 8.27 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -14.41183 mri =0.000 curv = 4.708 unmri = -4.419 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.71 , q= 9.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.71 , q= 9.42 ) 578 patches have been generated - 288 self-intersected max face = 1921(1961) - loop = 2 (6) - ntries = [289,778] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.48371 mri =0.000 curv = 4.723 unmri = -5.409 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.72 , q= 9.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.72 , q= 9.45 ) 578 patches have been generated - 289 self-intersected max face = 1921(2001) - loop = 3 (6) - ntries = [289,778] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.24539 mri =0.000 curv = 4.669 unmri = -5.429 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.67 , q= 9.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.67 , q= 9.34 ) 578 patches have been generated - 289 self-intersected max face = 1921(2045) - loop = 4 (6) - ntries = [289,778] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.51637 mri =0.000 curv = 4.620 unmri = -5.963 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.62 , q= 9.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.62 , q= 9.24 ) 578 patches have been generated - 289 self-intersected max face = 1921(2097) - loop = 5 (6) - ntries = [289,778] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.94033 mri =0.000 curv = 4.519 unmri = -3.136 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.52 , q= 9.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.52 , q= 9.04 ) 578 patches have been generated - 289 self-intersected max face = 1921(2145) - loop = 6 (6) - ntries = [289,778] BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.56196 mri =0.000 curv = 4.430 unmri = -0.156 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.43 , q= 8.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.43 , q= 8.86 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.59138 mri =0.000 curv = 5.242 unmri = -9.376 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.24 , q= 10.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.24 , q= 10.48 ) 578 patches have been generated - 289 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.59138 # generated patches : 3468 (1733 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -416 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-416 (nv=397202, nf=795236, ne=1192854) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 196 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 196!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -416 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-416 (nv=397202, nf=795236, ne=1192854) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 197 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 197: 46 vertices location: [ (167,99,198) - average intensity = 97.194 ] -gray ( 90.88 , 2.60 ) -white ( 103.95 , 3.55 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (90.879013 [log = -1.925890 ]- 103.947998 [log = -2.353727 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 70(70) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.72727 mri =0.000 curv = 0.518 unmri = 1.653 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.04 ) 24 patches have been generated - 0 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.72727 # generated patches : 24 (0 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -414 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-414 (nv=397224, nf=795276, ne=1192914) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 198 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 198!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -414 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-414 (nv=397224, nf=795276, ne=1192914) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 199 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 199: 315 vertices location: [ (167,143,205) - average intensity = 94.534 ] -gray ( 89.73 , 5.16 ) -white ( 98.85 , 3.11 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.728439 [log = -2.388664 ]- 98.851479 [log = -2.134277 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 588(588) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [89,245] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.76641 mri =0.000 curv = 1.978 unmri = 1.853 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.98 , q= 3.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.98 , q= 3.96 ) 178 patches have been generated - 89 self-intersected max face = 588(628) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [89,245] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.00662 mri =0.000 curv = 1.913 unmri = 6.356 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.83 ) 178 patches have been generated - 89 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.00662 # generated patches : 356 (178 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -410 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-410 (nv=397278, nf=795376, ne=1193064) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 200 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 200!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -410 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-410 (nv=397278, nf=795376, ne=1193064) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 201 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 201: 50 vertices location: [ (199,172,203) - average intensity = 93.709 ] -gray ( 85.81 , 3.71 ) -white ( 102.88 , 3.33 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.809204 [log = -2.251104 ]- 102.884109 [log = -2.126834 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 79(79) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,42] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.67886 mri =0.000 curv = 1.456 unmri = 0.853 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.46 , q= 2.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.46 , q= 2.91 ) 26 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.67886 # generated patches : 26 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -408 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-408 (nv=397300, nf=795416, ne=1193124) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 202 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 202: 33 vertices location: [ (175,144,203) - average intensity = 93.640 ] -gray ( 88.86 , 2.83 ) -white ( 99.79 , 3.22 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.859245 [log = -1.920761 ]- 99.786415 [log = -2.124218 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 53(53) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [9,31] BEST FITNESS (o)is -57.46714 mri =0.000 curv = 14.487 unmri = -0.481 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.49 , q= 28.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.49 , q= 28.97 ) 18 patches have been generated - 9 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -57.46714 # generated patches : 18 (9 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -406 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-406 (nv=397322, nf=795456, ne=1193184) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 203 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 203!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -406 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-406 (nv=397322, nf=795456, ne=1193184) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 204 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 204!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -406 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-406 (nv=397322, nf=795456, ne=1193184) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 205 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 205!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -406 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-406 (nv=397322, nf=795456, ne=1193184) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 206 with euler number -9 (5 loops) computing statistics for defect 206: 393 vertices location: [ (190,140,210) - average intensity = 92.011 ] -gray ( 82.98 , 6.40 ) -white ( 97.75 , 3.24 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.984657 [log = -2.734223 ]- 97.746376 [log = -2.165193 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 740(740) - loop = 1 (5) - ntries = [112,306] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.56782 mri =0.000 curv = 3.496 unmri = -0.416 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.50 , q= 6.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.50 , q= 6.99 ) 224 patches have been generated - 112 self-intersected max face = 740(780) - loop = 2 (5) - ntries = [112,306] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.51779 mri =0.000 curv = 3.347 unmri = 0.129 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.35 , q= 6.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.35 , q= 6.69 ) 224 patches have been generated - 112 self-intersected max face = 740(820) - loop = 3 (5) - ntries = [112,306] BEST FITNESS (o)is -19.49319 mri =0.000 curv = 4.584 unmri = 1.157 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.58 , q= 9.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.58 , q= 9.17 ) 224 patches have been generated - 112 self-intersected max face = 740(868) - loop = 4 (5) - ntries = [112,306] BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.35581 mri =0.000 curv = 4.589 unmri = 2.999 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.59 , q= 9.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.59 , q= 9.18 ) 224 patches have been generated - 112 self-intersected max face = 740(920) - loop = 5 (5) - ntries = [112,306] BEST FITNESS (o)is -35.18602 mri =0.000 curv = 4.295 unmri = 18.005 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.30 , q= 8.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.30 , q= 8.59 ) 224 patches have been generated - 112 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -35.18602 # generated patches : 1120 (560 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -396 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-396 (nv=397468, nf=795728, ne=1193592) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 207 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 207!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -396 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-396 (nv=397468, nf=795728, ne=1193592) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 208 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 208: 52 vertices location: [ (224,83,209) - average intensity = 91.483 ] -gray ( 86.21 , 6.26 ) -white ( 99.54 , 5.31 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.209091 [log = -2.501565 ]- 99.542717 [log = -2.835663 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 86(86) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.45350 mri =0.000 curv = 1.016 unmri = 0.388 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.02 , q= 2.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.02 , q= 2.03 ) 28 patches have been generated - 14 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.45350 # generated patches : 28 (14 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -394 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-394 (nv=397494, nf=795776, ne=1193664) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 209 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 209: 364 vertices location: [ (165,93,213) - average intensity = 94.132 ] -gray ( 90.10 , 4.89 ) -white ( 97.95 , 4.11 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (90.099266 [log = -2.240060 ]- 97.946465 [log = -2.102827 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 679(679) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [103,282] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.71799 mri =0.000 curv = 5.988 unmri = 0.766 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.99 , q= 11.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.99 , q= 11.98 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -22.07968 mri =0.000 curv = 5.566 unmri = -0.183 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.57 , q= 11.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.57 , q= 11.13 ) 206 patches have been generated - 103 self-intersected max face = 679(731) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [103,282] BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.84818 mri =0.000 curv = 5.504 unmri = 3.834 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.50 , q= 11.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.50 , q= 11.01 ) 207 patches have been generated - 3 self-intersected max face = 679(803) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [103,282] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.67805 mri =0.000 curv = 6.220 unmri = 2.796 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.22 , q= 12.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.22 , q= 12.44 ) 207 patches have been generated - 105 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -27.67805 # generated patches : 620 (211 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -388 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-388 (nv=397604, nf=795984, ne=1193976) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 210 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 210: 80 vertices location: [ (165,85,211) - average intensity = 92.497 ] -gray ( 87.64 , 5.33 ) -white ( 95.54 , 3.16 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (87.644211 [log = -2.736954 ]- 95.537918 [log = -2.100227 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 144(144) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [23,68] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.84775 mri =0.000 curv = 7.772 unmri = -0.239 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.77 , q= 15.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.77 , q= 15.54 ) 68 patches have been generated - 67 self-intersected max face = 144(184) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [23,68] BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.29683 mri =0.000 curv = 7.218 unmri = -0.576 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.22 , q= 14.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.22 , q= 14.44 ) 68 patches have been generated - 67 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -28.29683 # generated patches : 136 (134 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -384 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-384 (nv=397648, nf=796064, ne=1194096) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 211 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 211: 263 vertices location: [ (202,168,213) - average intensity = 93.959 ] -gray ( 84.51 , 4.53 ) -white ( 102.06 , 3.18 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.511055 [log = -2.592196 ]- 102.055000 [log = -2.064647 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 483(483) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [73,203] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.49975 mri =0.000 curv = 2.245 unmri = 0.521 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.24 , q= 4.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.24 , q= 4.49 ) 146 patches have been generated - 72 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -9.49975 # generated patches : 146 (72 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -382 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-382 (nv=397670, nf=796104, ne=1194156) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 212 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 212!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -382 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-382 (nv=397670, nf=796104, ne=1194156) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 213 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 213!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -382 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-382 (nv=397670, nf=796104, ne=1194156) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 214 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 214: 195 vertices location: [ (194,66,222) - average intensity = 91.280 ] -gray ( 85.18 , 7.87 ) -white ( 97.67 , 4.13 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.184395 [log = -3.173869 ]- 97.673264 [log = -2.641140 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 346(346) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [53,148] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.30093 mri =0.000 curv = 1.572 unmri = 0.013 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.57 , q= 3.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.57 , q= 3.14 ) 106 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected max face = 346(386) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [53,148] BEST FITNESS (o)is -87.71790 mri =0.000 curv = 21.101 unmri = 3.314 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.10 , q= 42.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.10 , q= 42.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -77.98053 mri =0.000 curv = 19.192 unmri = 1.213 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=19.19 , q= 38.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=19.19 , q= 38.38 ) 106 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -77.98054 # generated patches : 212 (106 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -378 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-378 (nv=397756, nf=796268, ne=1194402) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 215 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 215: 82 vertices location: [ (186,58,219) - average intensity = 92.677 ] -gray ( 89.58 , 3.24 ) -white ( 98.40 , 4.06 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.582291 [log = -1.944018 ]- 98.399895 [log = -2.476940 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 135(135) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [21,64] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.60599 mri =0.000 curv = 1.108 unmri = 1.172 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.22 ) 42 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -5.60599 # generated patches : 42 (21 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -376 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-376 (nv=397778, nf=796308, ne=1194462) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 216 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 216: 127 vertices location: [ (161,133,222) - average intensity = 92.953 ] -gray ( 89.02 , 2.45 ) -white ( 97.26 , 2.96 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.018600 [log = -1.828010 ]- 97.259178 [log = -2.056182 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 235(235) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [36,104] BEST FITNESS (o)is -113.99675 mri =0.000 curv = 27.257 unmri = 4.967 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=27.26 , q= 54.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=27.26 , q= 54.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -109.90707 mri =0.000 curv = 26.319 unmri = 4.632 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=26.32 , q= 52.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=26.32 , q= 52.64 ) 72 patches have been generated - 36 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -109.90707 # generated patches : 72 (36 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -374 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-374 (nv=397808, nf=796364, ne=1194546) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 217 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 217: 56 vertices location: [ (159,83,221) - average intensity = 99.347 ] -gray ( 88.99 , 3.05 ) -white ( 93.99 , 2.45 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.989624 [log = -2.057834 ]- 93.989059 [log = -1.770584 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 100(100) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [16,50] BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.66617 mri =0.000 curv = 7.686 unmri = -2.079 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.69 , q= 15.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.69 , q= 15.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.12065 mri =0.000 curv = 7.512 unmri = -1.929 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.51 , q= 15.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.51 , q= 15.02 ) 32 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -28.12066 # generated patches : 32 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -372 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-372 (nv=397830, nf=796404, ne=1194606) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 218 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 218!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -372 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-372 (nv=397830, nf=796404, ne=1194606) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 219 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 219: 111 vertices location: [ (192,70,232) - average intensity = 93.440 ] -gray ( 84.75 , 6.81 ) -white ( 97.17 , 3.48 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.753357 [log = -3.213054 ]- 97.166107 [log = -2.323910 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 192(192) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [30,87] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.78237 mri =0.000 curv = 7.698 unmri = -3.011 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.70 , q= 15.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.70 , q= 15.40 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.08108 mri =0.000 curv = 7.082 unmri = -3.247 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.08 , q= 14.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.08 , q= 14.16 ) 60 patches have been generated - 30 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -25.08108 # generated patches : 60 (30 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -370 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-370 (nv=397856, nf=796452, ne=1194678) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 220 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 220!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -370 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-370 (nv=397856, nf=796452, ne=1194678) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 221 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 221: 44 vertices location: [ (169,98,232) - average intensity = 92.486 ] -gray ( 89.36 , 2.49 ) -white ( 93.83 , 2.70 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.356201 [log = -1.797131 ]- 93.831017 [log = -1.890424 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 72(72) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,39] BEST FITNESS (o)is -285.92761 mri =0.000 curv = 71.317 unmri = 0.660 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=71.32 , q= 142.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=71.32 , q= 142.63 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -285.92761 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -368 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-368 (nv=397878, nf=796492, ne=1194738) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 222 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 222!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -368 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-368 (nv=397878, nf=796492, ne=1194738) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 223 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 223: 666 vertices location: [ (164,117,247) - average intensity = 92.741 ] -gray ( 89.14 , 2.94 ) -white ( 98.48 , 4.49 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.138199 [log = -1.906968 ]- 98.481102 [log = -2.780574 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1233(1233) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [186,503] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.39581 mri =0.000 curv = 3.400 unmri = 0.794 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.40 , q= 6.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.40 , q= 6.80 ) 557 patches have been generated - 556 self-intersected max face = 1233(1273) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [186,503] BEST FITNESS (o)is -94.98659 mri =0.000 curv = 22.902 unmri = 3.380 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=22.90 , q= 45.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=22.90 , q= 45.80 ) 557 patches have been generated - 556 self-intersected max face = 1233(1325) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [186,503] BEST FITNESS (o)is -86.85803 mri =0.000 curv = 21.784 unmri = -0.279 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.78 , q= 43.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.78 , q= 43.57 ) 557 patches have been generated - 556 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -86.85803 # generated patches : 1671 (1668 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -362 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-362 (nv=397962, nf=796648, ne=1194972) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 224 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 224: 249 vertices location: [ (181,132,246) - average intensity = 92.270 ] -gray ( 83.79 , 5.25 ) -white ( 99.56 , 3.80 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.785736 [log = -2.228944 ]- 99.564568 [log = -2.064450 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 435(435) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [66,184] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.91879 mri =0.000 curv = 1.307 unmri = 1.692 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.31 , q= 2.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.31 , q= 2.61 ) 132 patches have been generated - 66 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.91879 # generated patches : 132 (66 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -360 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-360 (nv=397992, nf=796704, ne=1195056) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 225 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 225: 333 vertices location: [ (161,88,246) - average intensity = 91.265 ] -gray ( 80.93 , 7.07 ) -white ( 96.99 , 4.44 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.927040 [log = -2.939808 ]- 96.989006 [log = -2.255400 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 595(595) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [90,248] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.25039 mri =0.000 curv = 6.209 unmri = -0.587 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.21 , q= 12.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.21 , q= 12.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.95823 mri =0.000 curv = 4.975 unmri = 2.057 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.98 , q= 9.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.98 , q= 9.95 ) 180 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected max face = 595(647) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [90,248] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.27384 mri =0.000 curv = 5.701 unmri = 1.471 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.70 , q= 11.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.70 , q= 11.40 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -23.86566 mri =0.000 curv = 5.599 unmri = 1.471 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.60 , q= 11.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.60 , q= 11.20 ) 180 patches have been generated - 90 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -23.86566 # generated patches : 360 (91 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -356 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-356 (nv=398042, nf=796796, ne=1195194) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 226 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 226!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -356 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-356 (nv=398042, nf=796796, ne=1195194) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 227 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 227!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -356 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-356 (nv=398042, nf=796796, ne=1195194) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 228 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 228: 51 vertices location: [ (194,127,245) - average intensity = 90.709 ] -gray ( 86.79 , 4.01 ) -white ( 97.79 , 4.46 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.792030 [log = -2.173061 ]- 97.793045 [log = -2.620070 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 83(83) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,43] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.79685 mri =0.000 curv = 0.957 unmri = 0.969 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.91 ) 26 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.79685 # generated patches : 26 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=398064, nf=796836, ne=1195254) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 229 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 229!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=398064, nf=796836, ne=1195254) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 230 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 230!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=398064, nf=796836, ne=1195254) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 231 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 231: 45 vertices location: [ (162,115,253) - average intensity = 92.436 ] -gray ( 89.26 , 2.83 ) -white ( 95.96 , 3.25 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (89.262253 [log = -1.858290 ]- 95.957573 [log = -2.198934 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 75(75) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,40] BEST FITNESS (o)is -49.93332 mri =0.000 curv = 12.611 unmri = -0.512 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.61 , q= 25.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.61 , q= 25.22 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -35.44558 mri =0.000 curv = 9.047 unmri = -0.741 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.05 , q= 18.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.05 , q= 18.09 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -35.44558 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -352 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-352 (nv=398094, nf=796892, ne=1195338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 232 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 232!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -352 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-352 (nv=398094, nf=796892, ne=1195338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 233 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 233: 1000 vertices location: [ (178,107,262) - average intensity = 93.499 ] -gray ( 82.28 , 6.47 ) -white ( 99.88 , 3.95 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.275070 [log = -3.284702 ]- 99.884262 [log = -2.436749 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 1878(1878) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [283,761] 849 patches have been generated - 849 self-intersected PBM : Could Not Increase Euler Number for defect 233 PBM : Could not correct topology AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -352 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-352 (nv=398094, nf=796892, ne=1195338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 234 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 234: 70 vertices location: [ (169,145,256) - average intensity = 91.601 ] -gray ( 80.75 , 7.58 ) -white ( 99.56 , 4.28 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (80.747375 [log = -2.967189 ]- 99.562088 [log = -2.364813 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 113(113) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,55] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.96131 mri =0.000 curv = 3.586 unmri = 0.615 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.59 , q= 7.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.59 , q= 7.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.01336 mri =0.000 curv = 0.763 unmri = -1.037 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.76 , q= 1.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.76 , q= 1.53 ) 36 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.01336 # generated patches : 36 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -350 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-350 (nv=398128, nf=796956, ne=1195434) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 235 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 235: 47 vertices location: [ (161,102,259) - average intensity = 90.893 ] -gray ( 88.86 , 3.89 ) -white ( 96.71 , 4.10 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (88.857674 [log = -2.168943 ]- 96.706459 [log = -2.452274 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 78(78) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,41] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.57269 mri =0.000 curv = 1.992 unmri = 1.606 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.99 , q= 3.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.99 , q= 3.98 ) 26 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -9.57269 # generated patches : 26 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -348 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-348 (nv=398150, nf=796996, ne=1195494) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 236 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 236: 89 vertices location: [ (159,109,262) - average intensity = 89.007 ] -gray ( 86.95 , 4.19 ) -white ( 94.75 , 3.51 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.952972 [log = -2.110205 ]- 94.747673 [log = -2.256248 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 156(156) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [24,72] BEST FITNESS (o)is -172.73130 mri =0.000 curv = 43.572 unmri = -1.559 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=43.57 , q= 87.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=43.57 , q= 87.14 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.81288 mri =0.000 curv = 4.732 unmri = -5.115 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.73 , q= 9.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.73 , q= 9.46 ) 48 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -13.81288 # generated patches : 48 (24 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -346 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-346 (nv=398186, nf=797064, ne=1195596) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 237 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 237: 73 vertices location: [ (189,112,263) - average intensity = 92.452 ] -gray ( 86.91 , 4.50 ) -white ( 97.52 , 3.78 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (86.906715 [log = -2.315637 ]- 97.520042 [log = -2.401192 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 122(122) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [19,59] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.80305 mri =0.000 curv = 7.568 unmri = 0.531 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.57 , q= 15.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.57 , q= 15.14 ) 38 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -30.80305 # generated patches : 38 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -344 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-344 (nv=398214, nf=797116, ne=1195674) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 238 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 238: 464 vertices location: [ (167,127,266) - average intensity = 93.015 ] -gray ( 85.76 , 5.22 ) -white ( 98.62 , 3.73 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (85.758186 [log = -2.531857 ]- 98.620598 [log = -2.243136 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 830(830) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [126,342] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.99508 mri =0.000 curv = 0.243 unmri = 0.025 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.49 ) 252 patches have been generated - 125 self-intersected max face = 830(882) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [126,342] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.92172 mri =0.000 curv = 0.260 unmri = -0.117 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.26 , q= 0.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.26 , q= 0.52 ) 377 patches have been generated - 376 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.92172 # generated patches : 629 (501 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -340 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-340 (nv=398288, nf=797256, ne=1195884) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 239 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 239: 81 vertices location: [ (161,101,263) - average intensity = 91.724 ] -gray ( 82.83 , 21.56 ) -white ( 91.65 , 23.99 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (82.831635 [log = -3.784819 ]- 91.648163 [log = -3.286270 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 145(145) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [23,68] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.29508 mri =0.000 curv = 2.919 unmri = 1.617 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.84 ) 46 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected max face = 145(185) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [23,68] BEST FITNESS (o)is -22.24648 mri =0.000 curv = 4.296 unmri = 5.061 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.30 , q= 8.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.30 , q= 8.59 ) 46 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -22.24648 # generated patches : 92 (46 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -336 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-336 (nv=398334, nf=797340, ne=1196010) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 240 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 240: 391 vertices location: [ (165,139,268) - average intensity = 91.388 ] -gray ( 84.35 , 12.49 ) -white ( 97.90 , 14.52 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.347603 [log = -2.342885 ]- 97.902534 [log = -2.505376 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 742(742) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [112,307] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.94801 mri =0.000 curv = 1.002 unmri = 6.941 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.00 , q= 2.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.00 , q= 2.00 ) 224 patches have been generated - 111 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -10.94801 # generated patches : 224 (111 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -334 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-334 (nv=398384, nf=797436, ne=1196154) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 241 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 241!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -334 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-334 (nv=398384, nf=797436, ne=1196154) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 242 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 242!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -334 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-334 (nv=398384, nf=797436, ne=1196154) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 243 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 243: 105 vertices location: [ (188,117,270) - average intensity = 93.004 ] -gray ( 83.28 , 7.13 ) -white ( 98.82 , 4.39 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (83.276283 [log = -3.056429 ]- 98.824356 [log = -2.379065 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 174(174) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [27,80] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.82546 mri =0.000 curv = 0.293 unmri = 1.652 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.29 , q= 0.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.29 , q= 0.59 ) 54 patches have been generated - 27 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.82546 # generated patches : 54 (27 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -332 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-332 (nv=398414, nf=797492, ne=1196238) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 244 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 244: 52 vertices location: [ (161,126,269) - average intensity = 93.246 ] -gray ( 84.09 , 18.13 ) -white ( 92.52 , 19.46 ) -gray ( 83.54 , 14.51 ) -white ( 99.16 , 12.21 ) -intensity (84.087212 [log = -3.687940 ]- 92.518921 [log = -2.803841 ]) -curv (k1=-0.149 (0.782) , r1 = 6.717 | k2=-0.060 (0.193), r2 = 16.796 ) -curv (k1=-0.108 (0.799) , r1 = 9.217 | k2=-0.033 (0.261), r2 = 30.070 ) max face = 80(80) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,42] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.40016 mri =0.000 curv = 0.963 unmri = 3.550 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.96 , q= 1.93 ) 26 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.40016 # generated patches : 26 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -330 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-330 (nv=398436, nf=797532, ne=1196298) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 245 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 245!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -330 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-330 (nv=398436, nf=797532, ne=1196298) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 The final surface does not self-intersect ! after topology correction, eno=-330 (nv=398436, nf=797532, ne=1196298, g=166) 0.000 % of the vertices (0 vertices) exhibit an orientation change topology fixing took 260.0 minutes /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_remove_intersection ../surf/lh.orig ../surf/lh.orig intersection removal took 0.00 hours writing corrected surface to ../surf/lh.orig rm ../surf/lh.inflated cp ../surf/lh.orig_corrected ../surf/lh.orig /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_remove_intersection ../surf/rh.orig ../surf/rh.orig intersection removal took 0.01 hours removing intersecting faces 000: 720 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 720 intersecting 002: 133 intersecting 003: 26 intersecting 004: 12 intersecting terminating search with 0 intersecting writing corrected surface to ../surf/rh.orig rm ../surf/rh.inflated #-------------------------------------------- #@# Make White Surf lh Fri Jul 14 14:12:48 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_make_surfaces -aseg ../mri/aseg.presurf -white white.preaparc -noaparc -whiteonly -mgz -T1 brain.finalsurfs -max_gray_at_csf_border 60 -max_csf 35 nmr01106 lh using white.preaparc as white matter name... only generating white matter surface using aseg volume ../mri/aseg.presurf to prevent surfaces crossing the midline not using aparc to prevent surfaces crossing the midline INFO: assuming MGZ format for volumes. using brain.finalsurfs as T1 volume... $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.172 2017/02/16 19:42:36 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/filled.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brain.finalsurfs.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/wm.mgz... 62122 bright wm thresholded. 6589 bright non-wm voxels segmented. reading original surface position from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.orig... computing class statistics... border white: 757455 voxels (1.89%) border gray 784249 voxels (1.96%) WM (99.0): 100.1 +- 6.2 [70.0 --> 110.0] GM (83.0) : 79.9 +- 12.4 [30.0 --> 110.0] setting MIN_GRAY_AT_WHITE_BORDER to 72.6 (was 70) setting MAX_BORDER_WHITE to 114.2 (was 105) setting MIN_BORDER_WHITE to 85.0 (was 85) setting MAX_CSF to 35.0 (was 40) setting MAX_GRAY to 101.8 (was 95) setting MAX_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 60.0 (was 75) setting MIN_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 47.9 (was 40) repositioning cortical surface to gray/white boundary smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000 vertex spacing 0.60 +- 0.18 (0.00-->2.66) (max @ vno 391120 --> 391123) face area 0.15 +- 0.07 (0.00-->1.34) mean absolute distance = 1.42 +- 1.68 14780 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... spring scale = 1.34 using class modes intead of means, discounting robust sigmas.... intensity peaks found at WM=108+-12.2, GM=85+-9.6 mean inside = 98.0, mean outside = 82.5 smoothing surface for 5 iterations... inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group mean border=97.8, 6317 (6317) missing vertices, mean dist -1.0 [1.6 (%73.9)->0.4 (%26.1))] %38 local maxima, %46 large gradients and %10 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=2.0, host=compu, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 0.000000 desired_rms_height 0.000000 momentum 0.000000 nbhd_size 0 max_nbrs 0 niterations 100 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 0 (0) use curv 0 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 2 mris->hemisphere 0 randomSeed 0 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000 vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.22 (0.01-->3.85) (max @ vno 272372 --> 272373) face area 0.15 +- 0.09 (0.00-->1.98) mean absolute distance = 0.64 +- 0.94 9234 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=30222466.0, rms=10.342 001: dt: 0.5000, sse=6590102.0, rms=7.385 (28.597%) 002: dt: 0.5000, sse=4646125.0, rms=5.781 (21.720%) 003: dt: 0.5000, sse=3946674.8, rms=5.090 (11.946%) 004: dt: 0.5000, sse=3689519.2, rms=4.774 (6.214%) 005: dt: 0.5000, sse=3598277.0, rms=4.578 (4.096%) 006: dt: 0.5000, sse=3442545.0, rms=4.432 (3.188%) 007: dt: 0.5000, sse=3372233.0, rms=4.319 (2.553%) 008: dt: 0.5000, sse=3343754.2, rms=4.226 (2.151%) 009: dt: 0.5000, sse=3097705.2, rms=4.110 (2.756%) 010: dt: 0.5000, sse=3073346.5, rms=4.032 (1.885%) rms = 3.96, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 011: dt: 0.5000, sse=3187514.0, rms=3.962 (1.746%) 012: dt: 0.2500, sse=2713254.0, rms=3.537 (10.737%) 013: dt: 0.2500, sse=2378768.5, rms=3.348 (5.334%) rms = 3.25, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 014: dt: 0.2500, sse=2391541.0, rms=3.255 (2.778%) rms = 3.24, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 015: dt: 0.1250, sse=2214142.8, rms=3.245 (0.307%) positioning took 6.1 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group mean border=97.6, 6294 (2839) missing vertices, mean dist -0.3 [0.8 (%52.7)->0.4 (%47.3))] %67 local maxima, %22 large gradients and % 4 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=1.0, host=compu, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500 vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.22 (0.01-->3.20) (max @ vno 391121 --> 391122) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->2.60) mean absolute distance = 0.41 +- 0.67 9859 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2894987.8, rms=4.271 rms = 3.51, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 016: dt: 0.5000, sse=3039889.5, rms=3.511 (17.785%) 017: dt: 0.2500, sse=2568355.2, rms=3.211 (8.568%) 018: dt: 0.2500, sse=2457805.5, rms=3.014 (6.125%) 019: dt: 0.2500, sse=2397582.5, rms=2.938 (2.523%) 020: dt: 0.2500, sse=2325323.0, rms=2.828 (3.755%) 021: dt: 0.2500, sse=2285722.8, rms=2.755 (2.562%) 022: dt: 0.2500, sse=2236598.0, rms=2.651 (3.781%) rms = 2.59, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 023: dt: 0.2500, sse=2273113.2, rms=2.591 (2.253%) rms = 2.55, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 024: dt: 0.1250, sse=2060242.2, rms=2.547 (1.710%) positioning took 3.7 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 1 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group mean border=98.1, 5996 (1951) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.5 (%61.6)->0.3 (%38.4))] %76 local maxima, %15 large gradients and % 3 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=1, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.22 (0.01-->3.30) (max @ vno 391115 --> 391116) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->2.78) mean absolute distance = 0.33 +- 0.51 10733 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2200066.5, rms=2.951 rms = 2.74, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 025: dt: 0.5000, sse=2646830.0, rms=2.736 (7.288%) 026: dt: 0.2500, sse=2267129.0, rms=2.554 (6.657%) rms = 2.46, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 027: dt: 0.2500, sse=2366017.2, rms=2.456 (3.835%) rms = 2.43, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 028: dt: 0.1250, sse=2019025.0, rms=2.430 (1.056%) positioning took 1.7 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group mean border=98.1, 6800 (1631) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.4 (%56.3)->0.3 (%43.7))] %79 local maxima, %12 large gradients and % 2 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.2, host=compu, nav=0, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 writing white matter surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.white.preaparc... writing smoothed curvature to lh.curv 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2073061.5, rms=2.569 rms = 2.45, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 029: dt: 0.5000, sse=2401367.2, rms=2.454 (4.462%) 030: dt: 0.2500, sse=2118256.5, rms=2.369 (3.479%) 031: dt: 0.2500, sse=2109405.0, rms=2.258 (4.689%) rms = 2.29, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 032: dt: 0.1250, sse=1684380.8, rms=2.174 (3.707%) rms = 2.14, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 033: dt: 0.1250, sse=1909836.8, rms=2.138 (1.653%) positioning took 2.3 minutes removing intersecting faces 000: 9 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 9 intersecting terminating search with 0 intersecting generating cortex label... 48 non-cortical segments detected only using segment with 25077 vertices erasing segment 1 (vno[0] = 134272) erasing segment 2 (vno[0] = 150848) erasing segment 3 (vno[0] = 162016) erasing segment 4 (vno[0] = 166024) erasing segment 5 (vno[0] = 169905) erasing segment 6 (vno[0] = 181373) erasing segment 7 (vno[0] = 185282) erasing segment 8 (vno[0] = 186431) erasing segment 9 (vno[0] = 214667) erasing segment 10 (vno[0] = 214684) erasing segment 11 (vno[0] = 214756) erasing segment 12 (vno[0] = 218998) erasing segment 13 (vno[0] = 239855) erasing segment 14 (vno[0] = 254495) erasing segment 15 (vno[0] = 254538) erasing segment 16 (vno[0] = 257028) erasing segment 17 (vno[0] = 257060) erasing segment 18 (vno[0] = 257079) erasing segment 19 (vno[0] = 258980) erasing segment 20 (vno[0] = 259047) erasing segment 21 (vno[0] = 264336) erasing segment 22 (vno[0] = 269175) erasing segment 23 (vno[0] = 270871) erasing segment 24 (vno[0] = 270939) erasing segment 25 (vno[0] = 273135) erasing segment 26 (vno[0] = 274656) erasing segment 27 (vno[0] = 274685) erasing segment 28 (vno[0] = 276369) erasing segment 29 (vno[0] = 276394) erasing segment 30 (vno[0] = 280014) erasing segment 31 (vno[0] = 285464) erasing segment 32 (vno[0] = 294046) erasing segment 33 (vno[0] = 316137) erasing segment 34 (vno[0] = 322453) erasing segment 35 (vno[0] = 324007) erasing segment 36 (vno[0] = 329660) erasing segment 37 (vno[0] = 330885) erasing segment 38 (vno[0] = 335611) erasing segment 39 (vno[0] = 336712) erasing segment 40 (vno[0] = 336862) erasing segment 41 (vno[0] = 340699) erasing segment 42 (vno[0] = 392775) erasing segment 43 (vno[0] = 393685) erasing segment 44 (vno[0] = 393774) erasing segment 45 (vno[0] = 394540) erasing segment 46 (vno[0] = 395590) erasing segment 47 (vno[0] = 397206) writing cortex label to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/label/lh.cortex.label... writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.curv writing smoothed area to lh.area writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.area vertex spacing 0.64 +- 0.22 (0.00-->3.85) (max @ vno 272372 --> 272373) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->2.80) refinement took 19.1 minutes #-------------------------------------------- #@# Make White Surf rh Fri Jul 14 14:31:55 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_make_surfaces -aseg ../mri/aseg.presurf -white white.preaparc -noaparc -whiteonly -mgz -T1 brain.finalsurfs -max_gray_at_csf_border 60 -max_csf 35 nmr01106 rh using white.preaparc as white matter name... only generating white matter surface using aseg volume ../mri/aseg.presurf to prevent surfaces crossing the midline not using aparc to prevent surfaces crossing the midline INFO: assuming MGZ format for volumes. using brain.finalsurfs as T1 volume... $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.172 2017/02/16 19:42:36 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/filled.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brain.finalsurfs.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/wm.mgz... 62122 bright wm thresholded. 6589 bright non-wm voxels segmented. reading original surface position from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.orig... computing class statistics... border white: 757455 voxels (1.89%) border gray 784249 voxels (1.96%) WM (99.0): 100.1 +- 6.2 [70.0 --> 110.0] GM (83.0) : 79.9 +- 12.4 [30.0 --> 110.0] setting MIN_GRAY_AT_WHITE_BORDER to 67.6 (was 70) setting MAX_BORDER_WHITE to 114.2 (was 105) setting MIN_BORDER_WHITE to 80.0 (was 85) setting MAX_CSF to 35.0 (was 40) setting MAX_GRAY to 101.8 (was 95) setting MAX_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 60.0 (was 75) setting MIN_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 42.9 (was 40) repositioning cortical surface to gray/white boundary smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000 vertex spacing 0.63 +- 0.19 (0.01-->6.19) (max @ vno 11721 --> 327403) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->11.41) mean absolute distance = 1.32 +- 1.57 12513 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... spring scale = 1.34 using class modes intead of means, discounting robust sigmas.... intensity peaks found at WM=108+-6.1, GM=80+-8.7 mean inside = 98.8, mean outside = 82.8 smoothing surface for 5 iterations... inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 4 vertex label from ripped group mean border=96.4, 568 (568) missing vertices, mean dist -0.8 [1.6 (%65.5)->0.5 (%34.5))] %49 local maxima, %39 large gradients and % 9 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=2.0, host=compu, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 0.000000 desired_rms_height 0.000000 momentum 0.000000 nbhd_size 0 max_nbrs 0 niterations 100 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 0 (0) use curv 0 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 2 mris->hemisphere 1 randomSeed 0 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000 vertex spacing 0.67 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.71) (max @ vno 66513 --> 70427) face area 0.17 +- 0.11 (0.00-->8.84) mean absolute distance = 0.64 +- 0.89 9104 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6035728.0, rms=8.813 001: dt: 0.5000, sse=3052302.0, rms=5.814 (34.036%) 002: dt: 0.5000, sse=2125482.0, rms=4.292 (26.172%) 003: dt: 0.5000, sse=1814038.1, rms=3.643 (15.113%) 004: dt: 0.5000, sse=1720598.8, rms=3.338 (8.371%) 005: dt: 0.5000, sse=1672552.2, rms=3.155 (5.500%) 006: dt: 0.5000, sse=1653354.5, rms=3.039 (3.682%) 007: dt: 0.5000, sse=1581822.1, rms=2.976 (2.055%) rms = 2.92, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 008: dt: 0.5000, sse=1620482.4, rms=2.919 (1.936%) 009: dt: 0.2500, sse=1288036.6, rms=2.083 (28.633%) 010: dt: 0.2500, sse=1230888.0, rms=1.870 (10.246%) rms = 1.78, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 011: dt: 0.2500, sse=1247338.5, rms=1.781 (4.718%) 012: dt: 0.1250, sse=1141017.4, rms=1.721 (3.371%) rms = 1.68, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 013: dt: 0.1250, sse=1150800.4, rms=1.683 (2.238%) positioning took 3.9 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group mean border=96.1, 930 (254) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.8 (%50.7)->0.4 (%49.3))] %77 local maxima, %16 large gradients and % 3 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=1.0, host=compu, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500 vertex spacing 0.66 +- 0.22 (0.02-->6.65) (max @ vno 235926 --> 217890) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->9.82) mean absolute distance = 0.43 +- 0.65 10183 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1897968.9, rms=3.678 014: dt: 0.5000, sse=1597765.1, rms=2.645 (28.084%) 015: dt: 0.5000, sse=1561303.2, rms=2.550 (3.593%) rms = 2.58, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 016: dt: 0.2500, sse=1223573.2, rms=1.901 (25.456%) rms = 1.56, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 017: dt: 0.2500, sse=1295396.6, rms=1.560 (17.966%) 018: dt: 0.1250, sse=1195504.1, rms=1.460 (6.375%) rms = 1.41, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 019: dt: 0.1250, sse=1222978.8, rms=1.413 (3.257%) positioning took 2.0 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 2 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group mean border=96.6, 1024 (218) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.5 (%60.0)->0.3 (%40.0))] %85 local maxima, % 9 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=1, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 vertex spacing 0.66 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.75) (max @ vno 235926 --> 217890) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->9.38) mean absolute distance = 0.33 +- 0.52 11031 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1423568.8, rms=2.344 rms = 1.99, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 020: dt: 0.5000, sse=1449936.8, rms=1.990 (15.082%) 021: dt: 0.2500, sse=1279395.2, rms=1.497 (24.778%) 022: dt: 0.2500, sse=1212058.9, rms=1.361 (9.120%) 023: dt: 0.2500, sse=1209855.9, rms=1.310 (3.734%) rms = 1.26, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 024: dt: 0.2500, sse=1194875.4, rms=1.264 (3.515%) rms = 1.21, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 025: dt: 0.1250, sse=1229760.0, rms=1.214 (3.928%) positioning took 1.8 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group mean border=96.5, 1354 (197) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.4 (%55.2)->0.3 (%44.8))] %88 local maxima, % 7 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.2, host=compu, nav=0, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 writing white matter surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.white.preaparc... writing smoothed curvature to rh.curv 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1316448.0, rms=1.682 026: dt: 0.5000, sse=1286690.9, rms=1.509 (10.233%) rms = 1.85, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 027: dt: 0.2500, sse=1068163.5, rms=1.182 (21.670%) rms = 1.16, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 028: dt: 0.2500, sse=1191018.8, rms=1.155 (2.300%) 029: dt: 0.1250, sse=1096290.8, rms=1.057 (8.487%) rms = 1.03, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 030: dt: 0.1250, sse=1040797.1, rms=1.026 (2.930%) positioning took 1.7 minutes removing intersecting faces 000: 25 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 25 intersecting terminating search with 0 intersecting generating cortex label... 17 non-cortical segments detected only using segment with 13623 vertices erasing segment 1 (vno[0] = 197689) erasing segment 2 (vno[0] = 198872) erasing segment 3 (vno[0] = 229622) erasing segment 4 (vno[0] = 230898) erasing segment 5 (vno[0] = 233707) erasing segment 6 (vno[0] = 237835) erasing segment 7 (vno[0] = 239297) erasing segment 8 (vno[0] = 242087) erasing segment 9 (vno[0] = 243638) erasing segment 10 (vno[0] = 247993) erasing segment 11 (vno[0] = 250430) erasing segment 12 (vno[0] = 251470) erasing segment 13 (vno[0] = 263868) erasing segment 14 (vno[0] = 269908) erasing segment 15 (vno[0] = 273596) erasing segment 16 (vno[0] = 282490) writing cortex label to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/label/rh.cortex.label... writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.curv writing smoothed area to rh.area writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.area vertex spacing 0.66 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.83) (max @ vno 217890 --> 235926) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->9.11) refinement took 14.1 minutes #-------------------------------------------- #@# Smooth2 lh Fri Jul 14 14:45:59 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_smooth -n 3 -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.white.preaparc ../surf/lh.smoothwm smoothing for 3 iterations setting seed for random number generator to 1234 smoothing surface tessellation for 3 iterations... smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Smooth2 rh Fri Jul 14 14:46:23 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_smooth -n 3 -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.white.preaparc ../surf/rh.smoothwm smoothing for 3 iterations setting seed for random number generator to 1234 smoothing surface tessellation for 3 iterations... smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Inflation2 lh Fri Jul 14 14:46:42 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_inflate -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_inflate.lh.dat -n 15 ../surf/lh.smoothwm ../surf/lh.inflated niterations = 15 Reading ../surf/lh.smoothwm avg radius = 52.6 mm, total surface area = 117953 mm^2 writing inflated surface to ../surf/lh.inflated writing sulcal depths to ../surf/lh.sulc step 000: RMS=0.183 (target=0.015) step 005: RMS=0.145 (target=0.015) step 010: RMS=0.127 (target=0.015) step 015: RMS=0.114 (target=0.015) step 020: RMS=0.103 (target=0.015) step 025: RMS=0.095 (target=0.015) step 030: RMS=0.088 (target=0.015) step 035: RMS=0.082 (target=0.015) step 040: RMS=0.078 (target=0.015) step 045: RMS=0.075 (target=0.015) step 050: RMS=0.071 (target=0.015) step 055: RMS=0.069 (target=0.015) step 060: RMS=0.068 (target=0.015) step 065: RMS=0.067 (target=0.015) step 070: RMS=0.067 (target=0.015) step 075: RMS=0.066 (target=0.015) step 080: RMS=0.068 (target=0.015) step 085: RMS=0.069 (target=0.015) step 090: RMS=0.070 (target=0.015) inflation complete. inflation took 3.3 minutes mris_inflate utimesec 464.793340 mris_inflate stimesec 1.645749 mris_inflate ru_maxrss 616020 mris_inflate ru_ixrss 0 mris_inflate ru_idrss 0 mris_inflate ru_isrss 0 mris_inflate ru_minflt 88793 mris_inflate ru_majflt 0 mris_inflate ru_nswap 0 mris_inflate ru_inblock 0 mris_inflate ru_oublock 31160 mris_inflate ru_msgsnd 0 mris_inflate ru_msgrcv 0 mris_inflate ru_nsignals 0 mris_inflate ru_nvcsw 88758 mris_inflate ru_nivcsw 10032 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Inflation2 rh Fri Jul 14 14:49:58 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_inflate -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_inflate.rh.dat -n 15 ../surf/rh.smoothwm ../surf/rh.inflated niterations = 15 Reading ../surf/rh.smoothwm avg radius = 53.3 mm, total surface area = 107084 mm^2 writing inflated surface to ../surf/rh.inflated writing sulcal depths to ../surf/rh.sulc step 000: RMS=0.158 (target=0.015) step 005: RMS=0.117 (target=0.015) step 010: RMS=0.095 (target=0.015) step 015: RMS=0.080 (target=0.015) step 020: RMS=0.068 (target=0.015) step 025: RMS=0.058 (target=0.015) step 030: RMS=0.050 (target=0.015) step 035: RMS=0.044 (target=0.015) step 040: RMS=0.038 (target=0.015) step 045: RMS=0.034 (target=0.015) step 050: RMS=0.030 (target=0.015) step 055: RMS=0.027 (target=0.015) step 060: RMS=0.026 (target=0.015) step 065: RMS=0.024 (target=0.015) step 070: RMS=0.022 (target=0.015) step 075: RMS=0.021 (target=0.015) step 080: RMS=0.020 (target=0.015) step 085: RMS=0.020 (target=0.015) step 090: RMS=0.019 (target=0.015) inflation complete. inflation took 2.7 minutes mris_inflate utimesec 392.197376 mris_inflate stimesec 1.910709 mris_inflate ru_maxrss 512952 mris_inflate ru_ixrss 0 mris_inflate ru_idrss 0 mris_inflate ru_isrss 0 mris_inflate ru_minflt 73756 mris_inflate ru_majflt 0 mris_inflate ru_nswap 0 mris_inflate ru_inblock 0 mris_inflate ru_oublock 25864 mris_inflate ru_msgsnd 0 mris_inflate ru_msgrcv 0 mris_inflate ru_nsignals 0 mris_inflate ru_nvcsw 107106 mris_inflate ru_nivcsw 8359 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Curv .H and .K lh Fri Jul 14 14:52:43 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf mris_curvature -w lh.white.preaparc total integrated curvature = 343.445*4pi (4315.860) --> -342 handles ICI = 2081.9, FI = 9811.0, variation=1468736.676 writing Gaussian curvature to ./lh.white.preaparc.K...done. writing mean curvature to ./lh.white.preaparc.H...done. rm -f lh.white.H ln -s lh.white.preaparc.H lh.white.H rm -f lh.white.K ln -s lh.white.preaparc.K lh.white.K mris_curvature -thresh .999 -n -a 5 -w -distances 10 10 lh.inflated normalizing curvature values. averaging curvature patterns 5 times. sampling 10 neighbors out to a distance of 10 mm 1360 vertices thresholded to be in k1 ~ [-9.18 4.41], k2 ~ [-1.27 1.00] total integrated curvature = -3.776*4pi (-47.450) --> 5 handles ICI = 1.7, FI = 70.1, variation=1003.359 758 vertices thresholded to be in [-3.11 1.05] writing Gaussian curvature to ./lh.inflated.K...thresholding curvature at 99.90% level curvature mean = -0.010, std = 0.077 521 vertices thresholded to be in [-4.10 2.06] done. writing mean curvature to ./lh.inflated.H...curvature mean = -0.027, std = 0.122 done. #-------------------------------------------- #@# Curv .H and .K rh Fri Jul 14 14:57:27 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf mris_curvature -w rh.white.preaparc total integrated curvature = 107.786*4pi (1354.475) --> -107 handles ICI = 539.0, FI = 4176.3, variation=69264.994 writing Gaussian curvature to ./rh.white.preaparc.K...done. writing mean curvature to ./rh.white.preaparc.H...done. rm -f rh.white.H ln -s rh.white.preaparc.H rh.white.H rm -f rh.white.K ln -s rh.white.preaparc.K rh.white.K mris_curvature -thresh .999 -n -a 5 -w -distances 10 10 rh.inflated normalizing curvature values. averaging curvature patterns 5 times. sampling 10 neighbors out to a distance of 10 mm 731 vertices thresholded to be in k1 ~ [-0.59 0.21], k2 ~ [-0.13 0.11] total integrated curvature = 0.112*4pi (1.408) --> 1 handles ICI = 1.6, FI = 14.8, variation=238.255 456 vertices thresholded to be in [-0.02 0.02] writing Gaussian curvature to ./rh.inflated.K...thresholding curvature at 99.90% level curvature mean = 0.000, std = 0.001 337 vertices thresholded to be in [-0.24 0.11] done. writing mean curvature to ./rh.inflated.H...curvature mean = -0.016, std = 0.026 done. #----------------------------------------- #@# Curvature Stats lh Fri Jul 14 15:01:20 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf mris_curvature_stats -m --writeCurvatureFiles -G -o ../stats/lh.curv.stats -F smoothwm nmr01106 lh curv sulc Toggling save flag on curvature files [ ok ] Outputting results using filestem [ ../stats/lh.curv.stats ] Toggling save flag on curvature files [ ok ] Setting surface [ nmr01106/lh.smoothwm ] Reading surface... [ ok ] Setting texture [ curv ] Reading texture... [ ok ] Setting texture [ sulc ] Reading texture...Gb_filter = 0 [ ok ] Calculating Discrete Principal Curvatures... Determining geometric order for vertex faces... [####################] [ ok ] Determining KH curvatures... [####################] [ ok ] Determining k1k2 curvatures... [####################] [ ok ] deltaViolations [ 917 ] Gb_filter = 0 WARN: S lookup min: -0.220384 WARN: S explicit min: 0.000000 vertex = 499 #----------------------------------------- #@# Curvature Stats rh Fri Jul 14 15:01:38 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf mris_curvature_stats -m --writeCurvatureFiles -G -o ../stats/rh.curv.stats -F smoothwm nmr01106 rh curv sulc Toggling save flag on curvature files [ ok ] Outputting results using filestem [ ../stats/rh.curv.stats ] Toggling save flag on curvature files [ ok ] Setting surface [ nmr01106/rh.smoothwm ] Reading surface... [ ok ] Setting texture [ curv ] Reading texture... [ ok ] Setting texture [ sulc ] Reading texture...Gb_filter = 0 [ ok ] Calculating Discrete Principal Curvatures... Determining geometric order for vertex faces... [####################] [ ok ] Determining KH curvatures... [####################] [ ok ] Determining k1k2 curvatures... [####################] [ ok ] deltaViolations [ 628 ] Gb_filter = 0 WARN: S lookup min: -0.004141 WARN: S explicit min: 0.000000 vertex = 210 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Sphere lh Fri Jul 14 15:01:53 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_sphere -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_sphere.lh.dat -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.inflated ../surf/lh.sphere setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.62 2017/02/07 19:04:37 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading original vertex positions... unfolding cortex into spherical form... surface projected - minimizing metric distortion... == Number of threads available to mris_sphere for OpenMP = 4 == scaling brain by 0.244... MRISunfold() max_passes = 1 ------- tol=5.0e-01, sigma=0.0, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=2, l_area=1.000, l_dist=1.000 using quadratic fit line minimization complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 1.000000 desired_rms_height -1.000000 momentum 0.900000 nbhd_size 7 max_nbrs 8 niterations 25 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 0 (0) use curv 0 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 2 mris->hemisphere 0 randomSeed 1234 -------------------- mrisRemoveNegativeArea() pass 1: epoch 1 of 3 starting distance error %26.23 pass 1: epoch 2 of 3 starting distance error %25.90 unfolding complete - removing small folds... starting distance error %23.68 removing remaining folds... final distance error %23.76 MRISunfold() return, current seed 1234 -01: dt=0.0000, 42612 negative triangles 274: dt=0.9900, 42612 negative triangles 275: dt=0.9900, 40399 negative triangles 276: dt=0.9900, 40577 negative triangles 277: dt=0.9900, 39877 negative triangles 278: dt=0.9900, 39503 negative triangles 279: dt=0.9900, 39203 negative triangles 280: dt=0.9900, 38685 negative triangles 281: dt=0.9900, 38483 negative triangles 282: dt=0.9900, 38190 negative triangles 283: dt=0.9900, 37962 negative triangles 284: dt=0.9900, 37696 negative triangles 285: dt=0.9900, 37519 negative triangles 286: dt=0.9900, 37390 negative triangles 287: dt=0.9900, 37160 negative triangles 288: dt=0.9900, 36977 negative triangles 289: dt=0.9900, 36783 negative triangles 290: dt=0.9900, 36556 negative triangles 291: dt=0.9900, 36344 negative triangles 292: dt=0.9900, 36307 negative triangles 293: dt=0.9900, 36268 negative triangles 294: dt=0.9900, 36094 negative triangles 295: dt=0.9900, 35989 negative triangles 296: dt=0.9900, 35889 negative triangles 297: dt=0.9900, 35724 negative triangles 298: dt=0.9900, 35760 negative triangles 299: dt=0.9900, 35611 negative triangles 300: dt=0.9900, 35585 negative triangles 301: dt=0.9900, 35429 negative triangles 302: dt=0.9900, 35299 negative triangles 303: dt=0.9900, 35234 negative triangles 304: dt=0.9900, 35177 negative triangles 305: dt=0.9900, 35174 negative triangles 306: dt=0.9900, 35127 negative triangles 307: dt=0.9900, 35123 negative triangles 308: dt=0.9900, 35048 negative triangles 309: dt=0.9900, 35044 negative triangles 310: dt=0.9900, 34946 negative triangles 311: dt=0.9900, 35005 negative triangles 312: dt=0.9900, 34901 negative triangles 313: dt=0.9900, 34875 negative triangles 314: dt=0.9900, 34743 negative triangles 315: dt=0.9900, 34733 negative triangles 316: dt=0.9900, 34650 negative triangles 317: dt=0.9900, 34669 negative triangles 318: dt=0.9900, 34611 negative triangles 319: dt=0.9900, 34521 negative triangles 320: dt=0.9900, 34514 negative triangles 321: dt=0.9900, 34583 negative triangles 322: dt=0.9900, 34528 negative triangles 323: dt=0.9900, 34464 negative triangles 324: dt=0.9900, 34342 negative triangles 325: dt=0.9900, 34440 negative triangles 326: dt=0.9900, 34364 negative triangles 327: dt=0.9900, 34375 negative triangles 328: dt=0.9900, 34247 negative triangles 329: dt=0.9900, 34312 negative triangles 330: dt=0.9900, 34178 negative triangles 331: dt=0.9900, 34311 negative triangles 332: dt=0.9900, 34259 negative triangles 333: dt=0.9900, 34257 negative triangles 334: dt=0.9900, 34156 negative triangles 335: dt=0.9900, 34223 negative triangles 336: dt=0.9900, 34196 negative triangles 337: dt=0.9900, 34265 negative triangles 338: dt=0.9900, 34124 negative triangles 339: dt=0.9900, 34090 negative triangles 340: dt=0.9900, 34113 negative triangles 341: dt=0.9900, 34126 negative triangles 342: dt=0.9900, 34083 negative triangles 343: dt=0.9900, 34060 negative triangles 344: dt=0.9900, 33990 negative triangles 345: dt=0.9900, 34037 negative triangles 346: dt=0.9900, 34027 negative triangles 347: dt=0.9900, 34033 negative triangles 348: dt=0.9900, 33912 negative triangles 349: dt=0.9900, 34036 negative triangles 350: dt=0.9900, 33834 negative triangles 351: dt=0.9900, 33872 negative triangles 352: dt=0.9900, 33787 negative triangles 353: dt=0.9900, 33841 negative triangles 354: dt=0.9900, 33825 negative triangles 355: dt=0.9900, 33824 negative triangles 356: dt=0.9900, 33732 negative triangles 357: dt=0.9900, 33778 negative triangles 358: dt=0.9900, 33648 negative triangles 359: dt=0.9900, 33869 negative triangles 360: dt=0.9900, 33680 negative triangles 361: dt=0.9900, 33709 negative triangles 362: dt=0.9900, 33783 negative triangles 363: dt=0.9900, 33690 negative triangles 364: dt=0.9900, 33726 negative triangles 365: dt=0.9900, 33686 negative triangles 366: dt=0.9900, 33696 negative triangles 367: dt=0.9900, 33714 negative triangles 368: dt=0.9405, 33732 negative triangles 369: dt=0.9405, 33618 negative triangles 370: dt=0.9405, 33656 negative triangles 371: dt=0.9405, 33719 negative triangles 372: dt=0.9405, 33623 negative triangles 373: dt=0.9405, 33588 negative triangles 374: dt=0.9405, 33651 negative triangles 375: dt=0.9405, 33567 negative triangles 376: dt=0.9405, 33590 negative triangles 377: dt=0.9405, 33472 negative triangles 378: dt=0.9405, 33504 negative triangles 379: dt=0.9405, 33439 negative triangles 380: dt=0.9405, 33455 negative triangles 381: dt=0.9405, 33515 negative triangles 382: dt=0.9405, 33547 negative triangles 383: dt=0.9405, 33491 negative triangles 384: dt=0.9405, 33396 negative triangles 385: dt=0.9405, 33436 negative triangles 386: dt=0.9405, 33360 negative triangles 387: dt=0.9405, 33395 negative triangles 388: dt=0.9405, 33377 negative triangles 389: dt=0.9405, 33308 negative triangles 390: dt=0.9405, 33355 negative triangles 391: dt=0.9405, 33361 negative triangles 392: dt=0.9405, 33364 negative triangles 393: dt=0.9405, 33252 negative triangles 394: dt=0.9405, 33261 negative triangles 395: dt=0.9405, 33225 negative triangles 396: dt=0.9405, 33195 negative triangles 397: dt=0.9405, 33145 negative triangles 398: dt=0.9405, 33187 negative triangles 399: dt=0.9405, 33139 negative triangles 400: dt=0.9405, 33137 negative triangles 401: dt=0.9405, 33118 negative triangles 402: dt=0.9405, 33138 negative triangles 403: dt=0.9405, 33122 negative triangles 404: dt=0.9405, 33036 negative triangles 405: dt=0.9405, 33070 negative triangles 406: dt=0.9405, 33005 negative triangles 407: dt=0.9405, 32942 negative triangles 408: dt=0.9405, 32991 negative triangles 409: dt=0.9405, 32946 negative triangles 410: dt=0.9405, 32995 negative triangles 411: dt=0.9405, 32894 negative triangles 412: dt=0.9405, 32961 negative triangles 413: dt=0.9405, 32921 negative triangles 414: dt=0.9405, 32967 negative triangles 415: dt=0.9405, 32874 negative triangles 416: dt=0.9405, 32975 negative triangles 417: dt=0.9405, 32901 negative triangles 418: dt=0.9405, 32754 negative triangles 419: dt=0.9405, 32831 negative triangles 420: dt=0.9405, 32826 negative triangles 421: dt=0.9405, 32684 negative triangles 422: dt=0.9405, 32781 negative triangles 423: dt=0.9405, 32752 negative triangles 424: dt=0.9405, 32733 negative triangles 425: dt=0.9405, 32761 negative triangles 426: dt=0.9405, 32841 negative triangles 427: dt=0.9405, 32657 negative triangles 428: dt=0.9405, 32732 negative triangles 429: dt=0.9405, 32687 negative triangles 430: dt=0.9405, 32728 negative triangles 431: dt=0.9405, 32641 negative triangles 432: dt=0.9405, 32697 negative triangles 433: dt=0.9405, 32607 negative triangles 434: dt=0.9405, 32720 negative triangles 435: dt=0.9405, 32546 negative triangles 436: dt=0.9405, 32601 negative triangles 437: dt=0.9405, 32591 negative triangles 438: dt=0.9405, 32581 negative triangles 439: dt=0.9405, 32530 negative triangles 440: dt=0.9405, 32542 negative triangles 441: dt=0.9405, 32516 negative triangles 442: dt=0.9405, 32522 negative triangles 443: dt=0.9405, 32596 negative triangles 444: dt=0.9405, 32498 negative triangles 445: dt=0.9405, 32428 negative triangles 446: dt=0.9405, 32517 negative triangles 447: dt=0.9405, 32414 negative triangles 448: dt=0.9405, 32439 negative triangles 449: dt=0.9405, 32420 negative triangles 450: dt=0.9405, 32463 negative triangles 451: dt=0.9405, 32472 negative triangles 452: dt=0.9405, 32389 negative triangles 453: dt=0.9405, 32392 negative triangles 454: dt=0.9405, 32445 negative triangles 455: dt=0.9405, 32360 negative triangles 456: dt=0.9405, 32368 negative triangles 457: dt=0.9405, 32263 negative triangles 458: dt=0.9405, 32428 negative triangles 459: dt=0.9405, 32361 negative triangles 460: dt=0.9405, 32391 negative triangles 461: dt=0.9405, 32327 negative triangles 462: dt=0.9405, 32401 negative triangles 463: dt=0.9405, 32307 negative triangles 464: dt=0.9405, 32339 negative triangles 465: dt=0.9405, 32339 negative triangles 466: dt=0.9405, 32331 negative triangles 467: dt=0.8935, 32332 negative triangles 468: dt=0.8935, 32292 negative triangles 469: dt=0.8935, 32255 negative triangles 470: dt=0.8935, 32289 negative triangles 471: dt=0.8935, 32288 negative triangles 472: dt=0.8935, 32307 negative triangles 473: dt=0.8935, 32298 negative triangles 474: dt=0.8935, 32258 negative triangles 475: dt=0.8935, 32285 negative triangles 476: dt=0.8935, 32302 negative triangles 477: dt=0.8935, 32299 negative triangles 478: dt=0.8935, 32297 negative triangles 479: dt=0.8488, 32298 negative triangles 480: dt=0.8488, 32189 negative triangles 481: dt=0.8488, 32223 negative triangles 482: dt=0.8488, 32158 negative triangles 483: dt=0.8488, 32214 negative triangles 484: dt=0.8488, 32208 negative triangles 485: dt=0.8488, 32179 negative triangles 486: dt=0.8488, 32267 negative triangles 487: dt=0.8488, 32188 negative triangles 488: dt=0.8488, 32291 negative triangles 489: dt=0.8488, 32261 negative triangles 490: dt=0.8488, 32259 negative triangles 491: dt=0.8488, 32176 negative triangles 492: dt=0.8064, 32212 negative triangles 493: dt=0.8064, 32162 negative triangles 494: dt=0.8064, 32167 negative triangles 495: dt=0.8064, 32171 negative triangles 496: dt=0.8064, 32175 negative triangles 497: dt=0.8064, 32159 negative triangles 498: dt=0.8064, 32213 negative triangles 499: dt=0.8064, 32139 negative triangles 500: dt=0.8064, 32205 negative triangles 501: dt=0.8064, 32226 negative triangles 502: dt=0.8064, 32156 negative triangles 503: dt=0.8064, 32207 negative triangles 504: dt=0.8064, 32223 negative triangles 505: dt=0.8064, 32250 negative triangles 506: dt=0.8064, 32214 negative triangles 507: dt=0.8064, 32154 negative triangles 508: dt=0.8064, 32219 negative triangles 509: dt=0.7660, 32222 negative triangles 510: dt=0.7660, 32132 negative triangles 511: dt=0.7660, 32128 negative triangles 512: dt=0.7660, 32183 negative triangles 513: dt=0.7660, 32130 negative triangles 514: dt=0.7660, 32123 negative triangles 515: dt=0.7660, 32108 negative triangles 516: dt=0.7660, 32123 negative triangles 517: dt=0.7660, 32131 negative triangles 518: dt=0.7660, 32127 negative triangles 519: dt=0.7660, 32112 negative triangles 520: dt=0.7660, 32201 negative triangles 521: dt=0.7660, 32137 negative triangles 522: dt=0.7660, 32236 negative triangles 523: dt=0.7660, 32210 negative triangles 524: dt=0.7660, 32167 negative triangles 525: dt=0.7277, 32152 negative triangles 526: dt=0.7277, 32196 negative triangles 527: dt=0.7277, 32176 negative triangles 528: dt=0.7277, 32152 negative triangles 529: dt=0.7277, 32226 negative triangles 530: dt=0.7277, 32138 negative triangles 531: dt=0.7277, 32214 negative triangles 532: dt=0.7277, 32186 negative triangles 533: dt=0.7277, 32174 negative triangles 534: dt=0.7277, 32150 negative triangles 535: dt=0.6914, 32180 negative triangles 536: dt=0.6914, 32106 negative triangles 537: dt=0.6914, 32214 negative triangles 538: dt=0.6914, 32161 negative triangles 539: dt=0.6914, 32188 negative triangles 540: dt=0.6914, 32140 negative triangles 541: dt=0.6914, 32220 negative triangles 542: dt=0.6914, 32141 negative triangles 543: dt=0.6914, 32199 negative triangles 544: dt=0.6914, 32138 negative triangles 545: dt=0.6914, 32117 negative triangles 546: dt=0.6568, 32153 negative triangles 547: dt=0.6568, 32131 negative triangles 548: dt=0.6568, 32064 negative triangles 549: dt=0.6568, 32107 negative triangles 550: dt=0.6568, 32114 negative triangles 551: dt=0.6568, 32059 negative triangles 552: dt=0.6568, 31986 negative triangles 553: dt=0.6568, 32079 negative triangles 554: dt=0.6568, 32061 negative triangles 555: dt=0.6568, 32051 negative triangles 556: dt=0.6568, 32000 negative triangles 557: dt=0.6568, 32052 negative triangles 558: dt=0.6568, 32037 negative triangles 559: dt=0.6568, 32091 negative triangles 560: dt=0.6568, 32022 negative triangles 561: dt=0.6568, 32067 negative triangles 562: dt=0.6239, 32044 negative triangles 563: dt=0.6239, 31959 negative triangles 564: dt=0.6239, 31990 negative triangles 565: dt=0.6239, 31998 negative triangles 566: dt=0.6239, 31999 negative triangles 567: dt=0.6239, 32012 negative triangles 568: dt=0.6239, 32029 negative triangles 569: dt=0.6239, 32006 negative triangles 570: dt=0.6239, 32047 negative triangles 571: dt=0.6239, 31992 negative triangles 572: dt=0.6239, 31999 negative triangles 573: dt=0.6239, 31958 negative triangles 574: dt=0.6239, 31975 negative triangles 575: dt=0.6239, 32035 negative triangles 576: dt=0.6239, 31948 negative triangles 577: dt=0.6239, 31963 negative triangles 578: dt=0.6239, 31917 negative triangles 579: dt=0.6239, 31933 negative triangles 580: dt=0.6239, 31935 negative triangles 581: dt=0.6239, 31956 negative triangles 582: dt=0.6239, 31900 negative triangles 583: dt=0.6239, 31917 negative triangles 584: dt=0.6239, 31933 negative triangles 585: dt=0.6239, 31942 negative triangles 586: dt=0.6239, 31915 negative triangles 587: dt=0.6239, 31917 negative triangles 588: dt=0.6239, 31941 negative triangles 589: dt=0.6239, 31953 negative triangles 590: dt=0.6239, 31934 negative triangles 591: dt=0.6239, 31917 negative triangles 592: dt=0.6239, 31897 negative triangles 593: dt=0.6239, 31941 negative triangles 594: dt=0.6239, 31894 negative triangles 595: dt=0.6239, 31901 negative triangles 596: dt=0.6239, 31895 negative triangles 597: dt=0.6239, 31907 negative triangles 598: dt=0.6239, 31889 negative triangles 599: dt=0.6239, 31918 negative triangles 600: dt=0.6239, 31849 negative triangles 601: dt=0.6239, 31843 negative triangles 602: dt=0.6239, 31858 negative triangles 603: dt=0.6239, 31868 negative triangles 604: dt=0.6239, 31806 negative triangles 605: dt=0.6239, 31862 negative triangles 606: dt=0.6239, 31791 negative triangles 607: dt=0.6239, 31776 negative triangles 608: dt=0.6239, 31793 negative triangles 609: dt=0.6239, 31759 negative triangles 610: dt=0.6239, 31775 negative triangles 611: dt=0.6239, 31748 negative triangles 612: dt=0.6239, 31732 negative triangles 613: dt=0.6239, 31717 negative triangles 614: dt=0.6239, 31759 negative triangles 615: dt=0.6239, 31763 negative triangles 616: dt=0.6239, 31724 negative triangles 617: dt=0.6239, 31746 negative triangles 618: dt=0.6239, 31651 negative triangles 619: dt=0.6239, 31819 negative triangles 620: dt=0.6239, 31693 negative triangles 621: dt=0.6239, 31694 negative triangles 622: dt=0.6239, 31702 negative triangles 623: dt=0.6239, 31776 negative triangles 624: dt=0.6239, 31686 negative triangles 625: dt=0.6239, 31732 negative triangles 626: dt=0.6239, 31739 negative triangles 627: dt=0.6239, 31653 negative triangles 628: dt=0.5927, 31680 negative triangles 629: dt=0.5927, 31710 negative triangles 630: dt=0.5927, 31706 negative triangles 631: dt=0.5927, 31696 negative triangles 632: dt=0.5927, 31657 negative triangles 633: dt=0.5927, 31677 negative triangles 634: dt=0.5927, 31690 negative triangles 635: dt=0.5927, 31662 negative triangles 636: dt=0.5927, 31670 negative triangles 637: dt=0.5927, 31652 negative triangles 638: dt=0.5927, 31631 negative triangles 639: dt=0.5927, 31652 negative triangles 640: dt=0.5927, 31623 negative triangles 641: dt=0.5927, 31706 negative triangles 642: dt=0.5927, 31639 negative triangles 643: dt=0.5927, 31655 negative triangles 644: dt=0.5927, 31621 negative triangles 645: dt=0.5927, 31616 negative triangles 646: dt=0.5927, 31622 negative triangles 647: dt=0.5927, 31604 negative triangles 648: dt=0.5927, 31598 negative triangles 649: dt=0.5927, 31593 negative triangles 650: dt=0.5927, 31583 negative triangles 651: dt=0.5927, 31564 negative triangles 652: dt=0.5927, 31565 negative triangles 653: dt=0.5927, 31572 negative triangles 654: dt=0.5927, 31616 negative triangles 655: dt=0.5927, 31527 negative triangles 656: dt=0.5927, 31632 negative triangles 657: dt=0.5927, 31613 negative triangles 658: dt=0.5927, 31583 negative triangles 659: dt=0.5927, 31626 negative triangles 660: dt=0.5927, 31526 negative triangles 661: dt=0.5927, 31530 negative triangles 662: dt=0.5927, 31553 negative triangles 663: dt=0.5927, 31520 negative triangles 664: dt=0.5927, 31530 negative triangles 665: dt=0.5927, 31504 negative triangles 666: dt=0.5927, 31523 negative triangles 667: dt=0.5927, 31497 negative triangles 668: dt=0.5927, 31484 negative triangles 669: dt=0.5927, 31448 negative triangles 670: dt=0.5927, 31486 negative triangles 671: dt=0.5927, 31419 negative triangles 672: dt=0.5927, 31506 negative triangles 673: dt=0.5927, 31444 negative triangles 674: dt=0.5927, 31503 negative triangles 675: dt=0.5927, 31429 negative triangles 676: dt=0.5927, 31475 negative triangles 677: dt=0.5927, 31454 negative triangles 678: dt=0.5927, 31438 negative triangles 679: dt=0.5927, 31482 negative triangles 680: dt=0.5927, 31376 negative triangles 681: dt=0.5927, 31476 negative triangles 682: dt=0.5927, 31464 negative triangles 683: dt=0.5927, 31424 negative triangles 684: dt=0.5927, 31407 negative triangles 685: dt=0.5927, 31469 negative triangles 686: dt=0.5927, 31439 negative triangles 687: dt=0.5927, 31445 negative triangles 688: dt=0.5927, 31444 negative triangles 689: dt=0.5927, 31467 negative triangles 690: dt=0.5631, 31474 negative triangles 691: dt=0.5631, 31406 negative triangles 692: dt=0.5631, 31447 negative triangles 693: dt=0.5631, 31448 negative triangles 694: dt=0.5631, 31424 negative triangles 695: dt=0.5631, 31461 negative triangles 696: dt=0.5631, 31461 negative triangles 697: dt=0.5631, 31504 negative triangles 698: dt=0.5631, 31442 negative triangles 699: dt=0.5631, 31512 negative triangles 700: dt=0.5350, 31461 negative triangles 701: dt=0.5350, 31433 negative triangles 702: dt=0.5350, 31497 negative triangles 703: dt=0.5350, 31497 negative triangles 704: dt=0.5350, 31500 negative triangles 705: dt=0.5350, 31483 negative triangles 706: dt=0.5350, 31466 negative triangles 707: dt=0.5350, 31487 negative triangles 708: dt=0.5350, 31508 negative triangles 709: dt=0.5350, 31488 negative triangles 710: dt=0.5082, 31486 negative triangles 711: dt=0.5082, 31428 negative triangles 712: dt=0.5082, 31501 negative triangles 713: dt=0.5082, 31491 negative triangles 714: dt=0.5082, 31473 negative triangles 715: dt=0.5082, 31473 negative triangles 716: dt=0.5082, 31479 negative triangles 717: dt=0.5082, 31462 negative triangles 718: dt=0.5082, 31486 negative triangles 719: dt=0.5082, 31465 negative triangles 720: dt=0.4828, 31503 negative triangles 721: dt=0.4828, 31459 negative triangles 722: dt=0.4828, 31500 negative triangles 723: dt=0.4828, 31468 negative triangles 724: dt=0.4828, 31490 negative triangles 725: dt=0.4828, 31506 negative triangles 726: dt=0.4828, 31476 negative triangles 727: dt=0.4828, 31523 negative triangles 728: dt=0.4828, 31538 negative triangles 729: dt=0.4828, 31502 negative triangles 730: dt=0.4587, 31491 negative triangles expanding nbhd size to 1 731: dt=0.9900, 31430 negative triangles 732: dt=0.9900, 31341 negative triangles 733: dt=0.9900, 30764 negative triangles 734: dt=0.9900, 30585 negative triangles 735: dt=0.9900, 30487 negative triangles 736: dt=0.9900, 30422 negative triangles 737: dt=0.9900, 30387 negative triangles 738: dt=0.9900, 30320 negative triangles 739: dt=0.9900, 30228 negative triangles 740: dt=0.9900, 30281 negative triangles 741: dt=0.9900, 30184 negative triangles 742: dt=0.9900, 30130 negative triangles 743: dt=0.9900, 30115 negative triangles 744: dt=0.9900, 30063 negative triangles 745: dt=0.9900, 30091 negative triangles 746: dt=0.9900, 30066 negative triangles 747: dt=0.9900, 30068 negative triangles 748: dt=0.9900, 30026 negative triangles 749: dt=0.9900, 30035 negative triangles 750: dt=0.9900, 29971 negative triangles 751: dt=0.9900, 29976 negative triangles 752: dt=0.9900, 29969 negative triangles 753: dt=0.9900, 29977 negative triangles 754: dt=0.9900, 29921 negative triangles 755: dt=0.9900, 29932 negative triangles 756: dt=0.9900, 29916 negative triangles 757: dt=0.9900, 29900 negative triangles 758: dt=0.9900, 29865 negative triangles 759: dt=0.9900, 29848 negative triangles 760: dt=0.9900, 29781 negative triangles 761: dt=0.9900, 29818 negative triangles 762: dt=0.9900, 29787 negative triangles 763: dt=0.9900, 29761 negative triangles 764: dt=0.9900, 29770 negative triangles 765: dt=0.9900, 29805 negative triangles 766: dt=0.9900, 29763 negative triangles 767: dt=0.9900, 29770 negative triangles 768: dt=0.9900, 29742 negative triangles 769: dt=0.9900, 29771 negative triangles 770: dt=0.9900, 29707 negative triangles 771: dt=0.9900, 29676 negative triangles 772: dt=0.9900, 29698 negative triangles 773: dt=0.9900, 29703 negative triangles 774: dt=0.9900, 29672 negative triangles 775: dt=0.9900, 29693 negative triangles 776: dt=0.9900, 29643 negative triangles 777: dt=0.9900, 29638 negative triangles 778: dt=0.9900, 29597 negative triangles 779: dt=0.9900, 29601 negative triangles 780: dt=0.9900, 29577 negative triangles 781: dt=0.9900, 29611 negative triangles 782: dt=0.9900, 29591 negative triangles 783: dt=0.9900, 29613 negative triangles 784: dt=0.9900, 29575 negative triangles 785: dt=0.9900, 29624 negative triangles 786: dt=0.9900, 29548 negative triangles 787: dt=0.9900, 29586 negative triangles 788: dt=0.9900, 29525 negative triangles 789: dt=0.9900, 29551 negative triangles 790: dt=0.9900, 29513 negative triangles 791: dt=0.9900, 29527 negative triangles 792: dt=0.9900, 29482 negative triangles 793: dt=0.9900, 29551 negative triangles 794: dt=0.9900, 29519 negative triangles 795: dt=0.9900, 29508 negative triangles 796: dt=0.9900, 29514 negative triangles 797: dt=0.9900, 29538 negative triangles 798: dt=0.9900, 29536 negative triangles 799: dt=0.9900, 29546 negative triangles 800: dt=0.9900, 29510 negative triangles 801: dt=0.9900, 29505 negative triangles 802: dt=0.9900, 29470 negative triangles 803: dt=0.9900, 29466 negative triangles 804: dt=0.9900, 29438 negative triangles 805: dt=0.9900, 29446 negative triangles 806: dt=0.9900, 29431 negative triangles 807: dt=0.9900, 29454 negative triangles 808: dt=0.9900, 29416 negative triangles 809: dt=0.9900, 29395 negative triangles 810: dt=0.9900, 29417 negative triangles 811: dt=0.9900, 29361 negative triangles 812: dt=0.9900, 29411 negative triangles 813: dt=0.9900, 29418 negative triangles 814: dt=0.9900, 29392 negative triangles 815: dt=0.9900, 29364 negative triangles 816: dt=0.9900, 29381 negative triangles 817: dt=0.9900, 29359 negative triangles 818: dt=0.9900, 29378 negative triangles 819: dt=0.9900, 29350 negative triangles 820: dt=0.9900, 29325 negative triangles 821: dt=0.9900, 29332 negative triangles 822: dt=0.9900, 29287 negative triangles 823: dt=0.9900, 29304 negative triangles 824: dt=0.9900, 29297 negative triangles 825: dt=0.9900, 29316 negative triangles 826: dt=0.9900, 29292 negative triangles 827: dt=0.9900, 29292 negative triangles 828: dt=0.9900, 29269 negative triangles 829: dt=0.9900, 29319 negative triangles 830: dt=0.9900, 29284 negative triangles 831: dt=0.9900, 29257 negative triangles 832: dt=0.9900, 29257 negative triangles 833: dt=0.9900, 29241 negative triangles 834: dt=0.9900, 29194 negative triangles 835: dt=0.9900, 29231 negative triangles 836: dt=0.9900, 29233 negative triangles 837: dt=0.9900, 29258 negative triangles 838: dt=0.9900, 29200 negative triangles 839: dt=0.9900, 29161 negative triangles 840: dt=0.9900, 29168 negative triangles 841: dt=0.9900, 29163 negative triangles 842: dt=0.9900, 29127 negative triangles 843: dt=0.9900, 29147 negative triangles 844: dt=0.9900, 29123 negative triangles 845: dt=0.9900, 29103 negative triangles 846: dt=0.9900, 29098 negative triangles 847: dt=0.9900, 29141 negative triangles 848: dt=0.9900, 29131 negative triangles 849: dt=0.9900, 29130 negative triangles 850: dt=0.9900, 29128 negative triangles 851: dt=0.9900, 29100 negative triangles 852: dt=0.9900, 29040 negative triangles 853: dt=0.9900, 29065 negative triangles 854: dt=0.9900, 29068 negative triangles 855: dt=0.9900, 29051 negative triangles 856: dt=0.9900, 29039 negative triangles 857: dt=0.9900, 29045 negative triangles 858: dt=0.9900, 28994 negative triangles 859: dt=0.9900, 28986 negative triangles 860: dt=0.9900, 28986 negative triangles 861: dt=0.9900, 29028 negative triangles 862: dt=0.9900, 28987 negative triangles 863: dt=0.9900, 29000 negative triangles 864: dt=0.9900, 28961 negative triangles 865: dt=0.9900, 28974 negative triangles 866: dt=0.9900, 28976 negative triangles 867: dt=0.9900, 28954 negative triangles 868: dt=0.9900, 28928 negative triangles 869: dt=0.9900, 28939 negative triangles 870: dt=0.9900, 28929 negative triangles 871: dt=0.9900, 28978 negative triangles 872: dt=0.9900, 28945 negative triangles 873: dt=0.9900, 28951 negative triangles 874: dt=0.9900, 28877 negative triangles 875: dt=0.9900, 28913 negative triangles 876: dt=0.9900, 28917 negative triangles 877: dt=0.9900, 28919 negative triangles 878: dt=0.9900, 28859 negative triangles 879: dt=0.9900, 28883 negative triangles 880: dt=0.9900, 28872 negative triangles 881: dt=0.9900, 28908 negative triangles 882: dt=0.9900, 28870 negative triangles 883: dt=0.9900, 28879 negative triangles 884: dt=0.9900, 28810 negative triangles 885: dt=0.9900, 28880 negative triangles 886: dt=0.9900, 28853 negative triangles 887: dt=0.9900, 28872 negative triangles 888: dt=0.9900, 28817 negative triangles 889: dt=0.9900, 28828 negative triangles 890: dt=0.9900, 28824 negative triangles 891: dt=0.9900, 28815 negative triangles 892: dt=0.9900, 28789 negative triangles 893: dt=0.9900, 28805 negative triangles 894: dt=0.9900, 28776 negative triangles 895: dt=0.9900, 28781 negative triangles 896: dt=0.9900, 28751 negative triangles 897: dt=0.9900, 28790 negative triangles 898: dt=0.9900, 28712 negative triangles 899: dt=0.9900, 28719 negative triangles 900: dt=0.9900, 28695 negative triangles 901: dt=0.9900, 28681 negative triangles 902: dt=0.9900, 28694 negative triangles 903: dt=0.9900, 28700 negative triangles 904: dt=0.9900, 28661 negative triangles 905: dt=0.9900, 28665 negative triangles 906: dt=0.9900, 28672 negative triangles 907: dt=0.9900, 28645 negative triangles 908: dt=0.9900, 28614 negative triangles 909: dt=0.9900, 28669 negative triangles 910: dt=0.9900, 28609 negative triangles 911: dt=0.9900, 28620 negative triangles 912: dt=0.9900, 28598 negative triangles 913: dt=0.9900, 28594 negative triangles 914: dt=0.9900, 28572 negative triangles 915: dt=0.9900, 28592 negative triangles 916: dt=0.9900, 28563 negative triangles 917: dt=0.9900, 28570 negative triangles 918: dt=0.9900, 28539 negative triangles 919: dt=0.9900, 28556 negative triangles 920: dt=0.9900, 28536 negative triangles 921: dt=0.9900, 28569 negative triangles 922: dt=0.9900, 28559 negative triangles 923: dt=0.9900, 28568 negative triangles 924: dt=0.9900, 28500 negative triangles 925: dt=0.9900, 28542 negative triangles 926: dt=0.9900, 28493 negative triangles 927: dt=0.9900, 28488 negative triangles 928: dt=0.9900, 28491 negative triangles 929: dt=0.9900, 28507 negative triangles 930: dt=0.9900, 28477 negative triangles 931: dt=0.9900, 28465 negative triangles 932: dt=0.9900, 28479 negative triangles 933: dt=0.9900, 28447 negative triangles 934: dt=0.9900, 28461 negative triangles 935: dt=0.9900, 28427 negative triangles 936: dt=0.9900, 28421 negative triangles 937: dt=0.9900, 28419 negative triangles 938: dt=0.9900, 28408 negative triangles 939: dt=0.9900, 28389 negative triangles 940: dt=0.9900, 28368 negative triangles 941: dt=0.9900, 28353 negative triangles 942: dt=0.9900, 28363 negative triangles 943: dt=0.9900, 28397 negative triangles 944: dt=0.9900, 28358 negative triangles 945: dt=0.9900, 28362 negative triangles 946: dt=0.9900, 28314 negative triangles 947: dt=0.9900, 28348 negative triangles 948: dt=0.9900, 28368 negative triangles 949: dt=0.9900, 28400 negative triangles 950: dt=0.9900, 28361 negative triangles 951: dt=0.9900, 28355 negative triangles 952: dt=0.9900, 28328 negative triangles 953: dt=0.9900, 28329 negative triangles 954: dt=0.9900, 28269 negative triangles 955: dt=0.9900, 28274 negative triangles 956: dt=0.9900, 28276 negative triangles 957: dt=0.9900, 28311 negative triangles 958: dt=0.9900, 28277 negative triangles 959: dt=0.9900, 28231 negative triangles 960: dt=0.9900, 28228 negative triangles 961: dt=0.9900, 28212 negative triangles 962: dt=0.9900, 28214 negative triangles 963: dt=0.9900, 28216 negative triangles 964: dt=0.9900, 28201 negative triangles 965: dt=0.9900, 28219 negative triangles 966: dt=0.9900, 28189 negative triangles 967: dt=0.9900, 28210 negative triangles 968: dt=0.9900, 28177 negative triangles 969: dt=0.9900, 28219 negative triangles 970: dt=0.9900, 28157 negative triangles 971: dt=0.9900, 28217 negative triangles 972: dt=0.9900, 28169 negative triangles 973: dt=0.9900, 28171 negative triangles 974: dt=0.9900, 28174 negative triangles 975: dt=0.9900, 28148 negative triangles 976: dt=0.9900, 28117 negative triangles 977: dt=0.9900, 28155 negative triangles 978: dt=0.9900, 28133 negative triangles 979: dt=0.9900, 28136 negative triangles 980: dt=0.9900, 28083 negative triangles 981: dt=0.9900, 28110 negative triangles 982: dt=0.9900, 28109 negative triangles 983: dt=0.9900, 28123 negative triangles 984: dt=0.9900, 28099 negative triangles 985: dt=0.9900, 28075 negative triangles 986: dt=0.9900, 28105 negative triangles 987: dt=0.9900, 28086 negative triangles 988: dt=0.9900, 28066 negative triangles 989: dt=0.9900, 28088 negative triangles 990: dt=0.9900, 28091 negative triangles 991: dt=0.9900, 28068 negative triangles 992: dt=0.9900, 28050 negative triangles 993: dt=0.9900, 28046 negative triangles 994: dt=0.9900, 28036 negative triangles 995: dt=0.9900, 28042 negative triangles 996: dt=0.9900, 28050 negative triangles 997: dt=0.9900, 28062 negative triangles 998: dt=0.9900, 28061 negative triangles 999: dt=0.9900, 28026 negative triangles 1000: dt=0.9900, 27985 negative triangles 1001: dt=0.9900, 27997 negative triangles 1002: dt=0.9900, 27989 negative triangles 1003: dt=0.9900, 27976 negative triangles 1004: dt=0.9900, 27985 negative triangles 1005: dt=0.9900, 28023 negative triangles 1006: dt=0.9900, 28041 negative triangles 1007: dt=0.9900, 28047 negative triangles 1008: dt=0.9900, 28002 negative triangles 1009: dt=0.9900, 27994 negative triangles 1010: dt=0.9900, 27957 negative triangles 1011: dt=0.9900, 27938 negative triangles 1012: dt=0.9900, 27954 negative triangles 1013: dt=0.9900, 27956 negative triangles 1014: dt=0.9900, 27951 negative triangles 1015: dt=0.9900, 27974 negative triangles 1016: dt=0.9900, 27972 negative triangles 1017: dt=0.9900, 27961 negative triangles 1018: dt=0.9900, 27906 negative triangles 1019: dt=0.9900, 27934 negative triangles 1020: dt=0.9900, 27910 negative triangles 1021: dt=0.9900, 27906 negative triangles 1022: dt=0.9900, 27945 negative triangles 1023: dt=0.9900, 27973 negative triangles 1024: dt=0.9900, 27929 negative triangles 1025: dt=0.9900, 27943 negative triangles 1026: dt=0.9900, 27893 negative triangles 1027: dt=0.9900, 27909 negative triangles 1028: dt=0.9900, 27897 negative triangles 1029: dt=0.9900, 27907 negative triangles 1030: dt=0.9900, 27875 negative triangles 1031: dt=0.9900, 27913 negative triangles 1032: dt=0.9900, 27872 negative triangles 1033: dt=0.9900, 27891 negative triangles 1034: dt=0.9900, 27836 negative triangles 1035: dt=0.9900, 27873 negative triangles 1036: dt=0.9900, 27837 negative triangles 1037: dt=0.9900, 27861 negative triangles 1038: dt=0.9900, 27818 negative triangles 1039: dt=0.9900, 27847 negative triangles 1040: dt=0.9900, 27859 negative triangles 1041: dt=0.9900, 27856 negative triangles 1042: dt=0.9900, 27827 negative triangles 1043: dt=0.9900, 27808 negative triangles 1044: dt=0.9900, 27796 negative triangles 1045: dt=0.9900, 27785 negative triangles 1046: dt=0.9900, 27790 negative triangles 1047: dt=0.9900, 27775 negative triangles 1048: dt=0.9900, 27762 negative triangles 1049: dt=0.9900, 27801 negative triangles 1050: dt=0.9900, 27763 negative triangles 1051: dt=0.9900, 27766 negative triangles 1052: dt=0.9900, 27764 negative triangles 1053: dt=0.9900, 27725 negative triangles 1054: dt=0.9900, 27717 negative triangles 1055: dt=0.9900, 27732 negative triangles 1056: dt=0.9900, 27694 negative triangles 1057: dt=0.9900, 27718 negative triangles 1058: dt=0.9900, 27693 negative triangles 1059: dt=0.9900, 27700 negative triangles 1060: dt=0.9900, 27676 negative triangles 1061: dt=0.9900, 27706 negative triangles 1062: dt=0.9900, 27706 negative triangles 1063: dt=0.9900, 27721 negative triangles 1064: dt=0.9900, 27691 negative triangles 1065: dt=0.9900, 27718 negative triangles 1066: dt=0.9900, 27717 negative triangles 1067: dt=0.9900, 27715 negative triangles 1068: dt=0.9900, 27694 negative triangles 1069: dt=0.9900, 27686 negative triangles 1070: dt=0.9900, 27658 negative triangles 1071: dt=0.9900, 27668 negative triangles 1072: dt=0.9900, 27642 negative triangles 1073: dt=0.9900, 27676 negative triangles 1074: dt=0.9900, 27686 negative triangles 1075: dt=0.9900, 27694 negative triangles 1076: dt=0.9900, 27633 negative triangles 1077: dt=0.9900, 27660 negative triangles 1078: dt=0.9900, 27668 negative triangles 1079: dt=0.9900, 27630 negative triangles 1080: dt=0.9900, 27602 negative triangles 1081: dt=0.9900, 27635 negative triangles 1082: dt=0.9900, 27653 negative triangles 1083: dt=0.9900, 27622 negative triangles 1084: dt=0.9900, 27571 negative triangles 1085: dt=0.9900, 27592 negative triangles 1086: dt=0.9900, 27572 negative triangles 1087: dt=0.9900, 27583 negative triangles 1088: dt=0.9900, 27563 negative triangles 1089: dt=0.9900, 27555 negative triangles 1090: dt=0.9900, 27509 negative triangles 1091: dt=0.9900, 27555 negative triangles 1092: dt=0.9900, 27535 negative triangles 1093: dt=0.9900, 27535 negative triangles 1094: dt=0.9900, 27501 negative triangles 1095: dt=0.9900, 27549 negative triangles 1096: dt=0.9900, 27526 negative triangles 1097: dt=0.9900, 27548 negative triangles 1098: dt=0.9900, 27500 negative triangles 1099: dt=0.9900, 27491 negative triangles 1100: dt=0.9900, 27446 negative triangles 1101: dt=0.9900, 27492 negative triangles 1102: dt=0.9900, 27477 negative triangles 1103: dt=0.9900, 27527 negative triangles 1104: dt=0.9900, 27467 negative triangles 1105: dt=0.9900, 27481 negative triangles 1106: dt=0.9900, 27462 negative triangles 1107: dt=0.9900, 27488 negative triangles 1108: dt=0.9900, 27451 negative triangles 1109: dt=0.9900, 27461 negative triangles 1110: dt=0.9900, 27395 negative triangles 1111: dt=0.9900, 27429 negative triangles 1112: dt=0.9900, 27432 negative triangles 1113: dt=0.9900, 27423 negative triangles 1114: dt=0.9900, 27402 negative triangles 1115: dt=0.9900, 27426 negative triangles 1116: dt=0.9900, 27386 negative triangles 1117: dt=0.9900, 27413 negative triangles 1118: dt=0.9900, 27357 negative triangles 1119: dt=0.9900, 27375 negative triangles 1120: dt=0.9900, 27356 negative triangles 1121: dt=0.9900, 27392 negative triangles 1122: dt=0.9900, 27351 negative triangles 1123: dt=0.9900, 27350 negative triangles 1124: dt=0.9900, 27371 negative triangles 1125: dt=0.9900, 27410 negative triangles 1126: dt=0.9900, 27317 negative triangles 1127: dt=0.9900, 27326 negative triangles 1128: dt=0.9900, 27346 negative triangles 1129: dt=0.9900, 27384 negative triangles 1130: dt=0.9900, 27366 negative triangles 1131: dt=0.9900, 27395 negative triangles 1132: dt=0.9900, 27352 negative triangles 1133: dt=0.9900, 27354 negative triangles 1134: dt=0.9900, 27370 negative triangles 1135: dt=0.9900, 27335 negative triangles 1136: dt=0.9405, 27321 negative triangles 1137: dt=0.9405, 27308 negative triangles 1138: dt=0.9405, 27315 negative triangles 1139: dt=0.9405, 27332 negative triangles 1140: dt=0.9405, 27330 negative triangles 1141: dt=0.9405, 27331 negative triangles 1142: dt=0.9405, 27318 negative triangles 1143: dt=0.9405, 27352 negative triangles 1144: dt=0.9405, 27349 negative triangles 1145: dt=0.9405, 27336 negative triangles 1146: dt=0.9405, 27303 negative triangles 1147: dt=0.9405, 27327 negative triangles 1148: dt=0.9405, 27318 negative triangles 1149: dt=0.9405, 27313 negative triangles 1150: dt=0.9405, 27293 negative triangles 1151: dt=0.9405, 27301 negative triangles 1152: dt=0.9405, 27274 negative triangles 1153: dt=0.9405, 27293 negative triangles 1154: dt=0.9405, 27306 negative triangles 1155: dt=0.9405, 27271 negative triangles 1156: dt=0.9405, 27245 negative triangles 1157: dt=0.9405, 27258 negative triangles 1158: dt=0.9405, 27220 negative triangles 1159: dt=0.9405, 27231 negative triangles 1160: dt=0.9405, 27206 negative triangles 1161: dt=0.9405, 27259 negative triangles 1162: dt=0.9405, 27215 negative triangles 1163: dt=0.9405, 27199 negative triangles 1164: dt=0.9405, 27207 negative triangles 1165: dt=0.9405, 27176 negative triangles 1166: dt=0.9405, 27248 negative triangles 1167: dt=0.9405, 27222 negative triangles 1168: dt=0.9405, 27180 negative triangles 1169: dt=0.9405, 27212 negative triangles 1170: dt=0.9405, 27204 negative triangles 1171: dt=0.9405, 27175 negative triangles 1172: dt=0.9405, 27165 negative triangles 1173: dt=0.9405, 27155 negative triangles 1174: dt=0.9405, 27161 negative triangles 1175: dt=0.9405, 27158 negative triangles 1176: dt=0.9405, 27168 negative triangles 1177: dt=0.9405, 27160 negative triangles 1178: dt=0.9405, 27130 negative triangles 1179: dt=0.9405, 27167 negative triangles 1180: dt=0.9405, 27121 negative triangles 1181: dt=0.9405, 27153 negative triangles 1182: dt=0.9405, 27160 negative triangles 1183: dt=0.9405, 27119 negative triangles 1184: dt=0.9405, 27118 negative triangles 1185: dt=0.9405, 27121 negative triangles 1186: dt=0.9405, 27121 negative triangles 1187: dt=0.9405, 27104 negative triangles 1188: dt=0.9405, 27080 negative triangles 1189: dt=0.9405, 27086 negative triangles 1190: dt=0.9405, 27069 negative triangles 1191: dt=0.9405, 27095 negative triangles 1192: dt=0.9405, 27051 negative triangles 1193: dt=0.9405, 27060 negative triangles 1194: dt=0.9405, 27058 negative triangles 1195: dt=0.9405, 27070 negative triangles 1196: dt=0.9405, 27064 negative triangles 1197: dt=0.9405, 27016 negative triangles 1198: dt=0.9405, 27020 negative triangles 1199: dt=0.9405, 27016 negative triangles 1200: dt=0.9405, 27058 negative triangles 1201: dt=0.9405, 27040 negative triangles 1202: dt=0.9405, 27049 negative triangles 1203: dt=0.9405, 27033 negative triangles 1204: dt=0.9405, 26969 negative triangles 1205: dt=0.9405, 27026 negative triangles 1206: dt=0.9405, 26988 negative triangles 1207: dt=0.9405, 26969 negative triangles 1208: dt=0.9405, 26954 negative triangles 1209: dt=0.9405, 26962 negative triangles 1210: dt=0.9405, 26970 negative triangles 1211: dt=0.9405, 26944 negative triangles 1212: dt=0.9405, 26938 negative triangles 1213: dt=0.9405, 26938 negative triangles 1214: dt=0.9405, 26936 negative triangles 1215: dt=0.9405, 26943 negative triangles 1216: dt=0.9405, 26957 negative triangles 1217: dt=0.9405, 26935 negative triangles 1218: dt=0.9405, 26937 negative triangles 1219: dt=0.9405, 26912 negative triangles 1220: dt=0.9405, 26940 negative triangles 1221: dt=0.9405, 26950 negative triangles 1222: dt=0.9405, 26905 negative triangles 1223: dt=0.9405, 26900 negative triangles 1224: dt=0.9405, 26892 negative triangles 1225: dt=0.9405, 26907 negative triangles 1226: dt=0.9405, 26948 negative triangles 1227: dt=0.9405, 26908 negative triangles 1228: dt=0.9405, 26926 negative triangles 1229: dt=0.9405, 26940 negative triangles 1230: dt=0.9405, 26902 negative triangles 1231: dt=0.9405, 26876 negative triangles 1232: dt=0.9405, 26864 negative triangles 1233: dt=0.9405, 26906 negative triangles 1234: dt=0.9405, 26863 negative triangles 1235: dt=0.9405, 26847 negative triangles 1236: dt=0.9405, 26877 negative triangles 1237: dt=0.9405, 26849 negative triangles 1238: dt=0.9405, 26870 negative triangles 1239: dt=0.9405, 26828 negative triangles 1240: dt=0.9405, 26841 negative triangles 1241: dt=0.9405, 26801 negative triangles 1242: dt=0.9405, 26826 negative triangles 1243: dt=0.9405, 26812 negative triangles 1244: dt=0.9405, 26845 negative triangles 1245: dt=0.9405, 26828 negative triangles 1246: dt=0.9405, 26788 negative triangles 1247: dt=0.9405, 26834 negative triangles 1248: dt=0.9405, 26851 negative triangles 1249: dt=0.9405, 26799 negative triangles 1250: dt=0.9405, 26788 negative triangles 1251: dt=0.9405, 26799 negative triangles 1252: dt=0.9405, 26805 negative triangles 1253: dt=0.9405, 26766 negative triangles 1254: dt=0.9405, 26759 negative triangles 1255: dt=0.9405, 26781 negative triangles 1256: dt=0.9405, 26777 negative triangles 1257: dt=0.9405, 26828 negative triangles 1258: dt=0.9405, 26768 negative triangles 1259: dt=0.9405, 26792 negative triangles 1260: dt=0.9405, 26770 negative triangles 1261: dt=0.9405, 26787 negative triangles 1262: dt=0.9405, 26801 negative triangles 1263: dt=0.9405, 26813 negative triangles 1264: dt=0.8935, 26784 negative triangles 1265: dt=0.8935, 26771 negative triangles 1266: dt=0.8935, 26787 negative triangles 1267: dt=0.8935, 26788 negative triangles 1268: dt=0.8935, 26785 negative triangles 1269: dt=0.8935, 26807 negative triangles 1270: dt=0.8935, 26759 negative triangles 1271: dt=0.8935, 26762 negative triangles 1272: dt=0.8935, 26779 negative triangles 1273: dt=0.8935, 26787 negative triangles 1274: dt=0.8488, 26795 negative triangles 1275: 26794 negative triangles writing spherical brain to ../surf/lh.sphere spherical transformation took 3.81 hours mris_sphere utimesec 44883.009745 mris_sphere stimesec 17.256376 mris_sphere ru_maxrss 851848 mris_sphere ru_ixrss 0 mris_sphere ru_idrss 0 mris_sphere ru_isrss 0 mris_sphere ru_minflt 147894 mris_sphere ru_majflt 0 mris_sphere ru_nswap 0 mris_sphere ru_inblock 0 mris_sphere ru_oublock 28040 mris_sphere ru_msgsnd 0 mris_sphere ru_msgrcv 0 mris_sphere ru_nsignals 0 mris_sphere ru_nvcsw 591676 mris_sphere ru_nivcsw 557010 FSRUNTIME@ mris_sphere 3.8126 hours 1 threads #-------------------------------------------- #@# Sphere rh Fri Jul 14 18:50:39 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_sphere -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_sphere.rh.dat -seed 1234 ../surf/rh.inflated ../surf/rh.sphere setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.62 2017/02/07 19:04:37 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading original vertex positions... unfolding cortex into spherical form... surface projected - minimizing metric distortion... == Number of threads available to mris_sphere for OpenMP = 4 == scaling brain by 0.253... MRISunfold() max_passes = 1 ------- tol=5.0e-01, sigma=0.0, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=2, l_area=1.000, l_dist=1.000 using quadratic fit line minimization complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 1.000000 desired_rms_height -1.000000 momentum 0.900000 nbhd_size 7 max_nbrs 8 niterations 25 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 0 (0) use curv 0 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 2 mris->hemisphere 1 randomSeed 1234 -------------------- mrisRemoveNegativeArea() pass 1: epoch 1 of 3 starting distance error %21.30 pass 1: epoch 2 of 3 starting distance error %21.28 unfolding complete - removing small folds... starting distance error %20.27 removing remaining folds... final distance error %20.31 MRISunfold() return, current seed 1234 -01: dt=0.0000, 2473 negative triangles 189: dt=0.9900, 2473 negative triangles 190: dt=0.9900, 1667 negative triangles 191: dt=0.9900, 1493 negative triangles 192: dt=0.9900, 1400 negative triangles 193: dt=0.9900, 1297 negative triangles 194: dt=0.9900, 1238 negative triangles 195: dt=0.9900, 1174 negative triangles 196: dt=0.9900, 1126 negative triangles 197: dt=0.9900, 1054 negative triangles 198: dt=0.9900, 1044 negative triangles 199: dt=0.9900, 1003 negative triangles 200: dt=0.9900, 989 negative triangles 201: dt=0.9900, 993 negative triangles 202: dt=0.9900, 951 negative triangles 203: dt=0.9900, 939 negative triangles 204: dt=0.9900, 938 negative triangles 205: dt=0.9900, 920 negative triangles 206: dt=0.9900, 928 negative triangles 207: dt=0.9900, 888 negative triangles 208: dt=0.9900, 906 negative triangles 209: dt=0.9900, 854 negative triangles 210: dt=0.9900, 833 negative triangles 211: dt=0.9900, 836 negative triangles 212: dt=0.9900, 826 negative triangles 213: dt=0.9900, 820 negative triangles 214: dt=0.9900, 823 negative triangles 215: dt=0.9900, 797 negative triangles 216: dt=0.9900, 778 negative triangles 217: dt=0.9900, 770 negative triangles 218: dt=0.9900, 772 negative triangles 219: dt=0.9900, 753 negative triangles 220: dt=0.9900, 744 negative triangles 221: dt=0.9900, 739 negative triangles 222: dt=0.9900, 730 negative triangles 223: dt=0.9900, 700 negative triangles 224: dt=0.9900, 689 negative triangles 225: dt=0.9900, 697 negative triangles 226: dt=0.9900, 656 negative triangles 227: dt=0.9900, 664 negative triangles 228: dt=0.9900, 648 negative triangles 229: dt=0.9900, 646 negative triangles 230: dt=0.9900, 628 negative triangles 231: dt=0.9900, 611 negative triangles 232: dt=0.9900, 609 negative triangles 233: dt=0.9900, 613 negative triangles 234: dt=0.9900, 584 negative triangles 235: dt=0.9900, 590 negative triangles 236: dt=0.9900, 573 negative triangles 237: dt=0.9900, 568 negative triangles 238: dt=0.9900, 551 negative triangles 239: dt=0.9900, 542 negative triangles 240: dt=0.9900, 525 negative triangles 241: dt=0.9900, 513 negative triangles 242: dt=0.9900, 504 negative triangles 243: dt=0.9900, 493 negative triangles 244: dt=0.9900, 481 negative triangles 245: dt=0.9900, 480 negative triangles 246: dt=0.9900, 480 negative triangles 247: dt=0.9900, 458 negative triangles 248: dt=0.9900, 445 negative triangles 249: dt=0.9900, 436 negative triangles 250: dt=0.9900, 437 negative triangles 251: dt=0.9900, 441 negative triangles 252: dt=0.9900, 430 negative triangles 253: dt=0.9900, 420 negative triangles 254: dt=0.9900, 429 negative triangles 255: dt=0.9900, 408 negative triangles 256: dt=0.9900, 400 negative triangles 257: dt=0.9900, 400 negative triangles 258: dt=0.9900, 394 negative triangles 259: dt=0.9900, 391 negative triangles 260: dt=0.9900, 361 negative triangles 261: dt=0.9900, 380 negative triangles 262: dt=0.9900, 363 negative triangles 263: dt=0.9900, 356 negative triangles 264: dt=0.9900, 338 negative triangles 265: dt=0.9900, 319 negative triangles 266: dt=0.9900, 333 negative triangles 267: dt=0.9900, 326 negative triangles 268: dt=0.9900, 319 negative triangles 269: dt=0.9900, 328 negative triangles 270: dt=0.9900, 297 negative triangles 271: dt=0.9900, 303 negative triangles 272: dt=0.9900, 301 negative triangles 273: dt=0.9900, 276 negative triangles 274: dt=0.9900, 271 negative triangles 275: dt=0.9900, 278 negative triangles 276: dt=0.9900, 267 negative triangles 277: dt=0.9900, 271 negative triangles 278: dt=0.9900, 263 negative triangles 279: dt=0.9900, 260 negative triangles 280: dt=0.9900, 255 negative triangles 281: dt=0.9900, 261 negative triangles 282: dt=0.9900, 247 negative triangles 283: dt=0.9900, 249 negative triangles 284: dt=0.9900, 231 negative triangles 285: dt=0.9900, 249 negative triangles 286: dt=0.9900, 234 negative triangles 287: dt=0.9900, 225 negative triangles 288: dt=0.9900, 230 negative triangles 289: dt=0.9900, 223 negative triangles 290: dt=0.9900, 234 negative triangles 291: dt=0.9900, 231 negative triangles 292: dt=0.9900, 228 negative triangles 293: dt=0.9900, 220 negative triangles 294: dt=0.9900, 220 negative triangles 295: dt=0.9900, 212 negative triangles 296: dt=0.9900, 218 negative triangles 297: dt=0.9900, 212 negative triangles 298: dt=0.9900, 211 negative triangles 299: dt=0.9900, 220 negative triangles 300: dt=0.9900, 209 negative triangles 301: dt=0.9900, 191 negative triangles 302: dt=0.9900, 194 negative triangles 303: dt=0.9900, 193 negative triangles 304: dt=0.9900, 186 negative triangles 305: dt=0.9900, 190 negative triangles 306: dt=0.9900, 198 negative triangles 307: dt=0.9900, 175 negative triangles 308: dt=0.9900, 176 negative triangles 309: dt=0.9900, 169 negative triangles 310: dt=0.9900, 165 negative triangles 311: dt=0.9900, 169 negative triangles 312: dt=0.9900, 164 negative triangles 313: dt=0.9900, 153 negative triangles 314: dt=0.9900, 141 negative triangles 315: dt=0.9900, 139 negative triangles 316: dt=0.9900, 137 negative triangles 317: dt=0.9900, 139 negative triangles 318: dt=0.9900, 132 negative triangles 319: dt=0.9900, 119 negative triangles 320: dt=0.9900, 112 negative triangles 321: dt=0.9900, 116 negative triangles 322: dt=0.9900, 112 negative triangles 323: dt=0.9900, 111 negative triangles 324: dt=0.9900, 103 negative triangles 325: dt=0.9900, 105 negative triangles 326: dt=0.9900, 103 negative triangles 327: dt=0.9900, 98 negative triangles 328: dt=0.9900, 79 negative triangles 329: dt=0.9900, 89 negative triangles 330: dt=0.9900, 78 negative triangles 331: dt=0.9900, 79 negative triangles 332: dt=0.9900, 61 negative triangles 333: dt=0.9900, 72 negative triangles 334: dt=0.9900, 63 negative triangles 335: dt=0.9900, 54 negative triangles 336: dt=0.9900, 53 negative triangles 337: dt=0.9900, 43 negative triangles 338: dt=0.9900, 42 negative triangles 339: dt=0.9900, 40 negative triangles 340: dt=0.9900, 38 negative triangles 341: dt=0.9900, 32 negative triangles 342: dt=0.9900, 33 negative triangles 343: dt=0.9900, 23 negative triangles 344: dt=0.9900, 28 negative triangles 345: dt=0.9900, 22 negative triangles 346: dt=0.9900, 23 negative triangles 347: dt=0.9900, 23 negative triangles 348: dt=0.9900, 20 negative triangles 349: dt=0.9900, 18 negative triangles 350: dt=0.9900, 22 negative triangles 351: dt=0.9900, 17 negative triangles 352: dt=0.9900, 18 negative triangles 353: dt=0.9900, 23 negative triangles 354: dt=0.9900, 22 negative triangles 355: dt=0.9900, 15 negative triangles 356: dt=0.9900, 19 negative triangles 357: dt=0.9900, 16 negative triangles 358: dt=0.9900, 15 negative triangles 359: dt=0.9900, 15 negative triangles 360: dt=0.9900, 15 negative triangles 361: dt=0.9900, 14 negative triangles 362: dt=0.9900, 11 negative triangles 363: dt=0.9900, 16 negative triangles 364: dt=0.9900, 14 negative triangles 365: dt=0.9900, 8 negative triangles 366: dt=0.9900, 11 negative triangles 367: dt=0.9900, 10 negative triangles 368: dt=0.9900, 9 negative triangles 369: dt=0.9900, 10 negative triangles 370: dt=0.9900, 9 negative triangles 371: dt=0.9900, 6 negative triangles 372: dt=0.9900, 7 negative triangles 373: dt=0.9900, 4 negative triangles 374: dt=0.9900, 5 negative triangles 375: dt=0.9900, 4 negative triangles 376: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 377: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 378: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 379: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 380: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 381: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 382: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 383: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 384: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 385: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 386: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 387: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 388: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 389: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 390: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 391: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 392: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 393: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 394: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 395: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 396: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 397: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 398: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 399: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 400: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 401: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 402: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles expanding nbhd size to 1 403: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 404: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 405: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 406: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 407: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 408: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 409: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 410: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 411: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 412: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 413: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 414: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 415: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 416: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 417: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 418: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 419: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 420: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 421: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 422: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 423: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 424: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 425: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 426: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 427: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 428: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 429: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 430: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 431: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 432: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 433: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 434: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 435: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 436: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 437: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 438: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 439: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 440: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 441: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 442: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 443: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 444: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 445: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 446: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 447: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 448: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 449: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 450: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 451: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 452: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 453: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 454: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 455: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 456: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 457: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 458: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 459: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 460: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 461: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 462: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 463: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 464: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 465: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 466: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 467: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 468: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 469: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 470: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 471: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 472: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 473: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 474: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 475: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 476: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 477: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 478: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 479: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 480: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 481: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 482: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 483: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 484: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 485: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 486: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 487: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 488: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 489: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 490: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 491: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 492: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 493: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 494: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 495: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 496: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 497: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 498: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 499: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 500: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 501: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 502: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 503: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 504: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 505: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 506: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 507: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 508: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 509: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 510: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 511: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 512: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 513: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 514: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 515: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 516: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 517: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 518: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 519: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 520: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 521: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 522: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 523: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 524: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 525: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 526: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 527: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 528: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 529: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 530: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 531: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 532: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 533: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 534: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 535: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 536: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 537: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 538: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 539: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 540: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 541: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 542: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 543: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 544: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 545: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 546: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 547: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 548: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 549: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 550: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 551: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 552: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 553: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 554: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 555: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 556: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 557: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 558: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 559: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 560: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 561: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 562: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 563: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 564: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 565: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 566: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 567: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 568: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 569: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 570: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 571: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 572: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 573: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 574: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 575: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 576: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 577: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 578: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 579: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 580: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 581: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 582: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 583: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 584: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 585: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 586: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 587: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 588: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 589: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 590: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 591: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 592: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 593: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 594: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 595: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 596: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 597: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 598: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 599: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 600: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 601: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 602: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 603: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 604: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 605: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 606: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 607: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 608: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 609: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 610: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 611: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 612: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 613: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 614: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 615: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 616: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 617: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 618: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 619: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 620: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 621: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 622: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 623: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 624: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 625: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 626: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 627: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 628: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 629: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 630: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 631: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 632: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 633: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 634: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 635: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 636: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 637: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 638: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 639: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 640: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 641: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 642: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 643: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 644: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 645: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 646: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 647: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 648: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 649: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 650: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 651: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 652: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 653: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 654: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 655: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 656: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 657: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 658: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 659: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 660: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 661: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 662: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 663: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 664: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 665: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 666: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 667: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 668: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 669: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 670: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 671: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 672: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 673: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 674: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 675: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 676: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 677: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 678: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 679: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 680: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 681: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 682: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 683: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 684: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 685: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 686: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 687: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 688: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 689: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 690: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 691: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 692: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 693: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 694: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 695: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 696: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 697: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 698: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 699: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 700: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 701: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 702: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 703: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 704: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 705: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 706: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 707: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 708: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 709: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 710: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 711: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 712: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 713: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 714: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 715: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 716: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 717: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 718: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 719: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 720: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 721: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 722: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 723: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 724: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 725: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 726: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 727: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 728: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 729: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 730: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 731: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 732: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 733: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 734: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 735: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 736: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 737: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 738: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 739: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 740: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 741: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 742: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 743: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 744: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 745: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 746: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 747: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 748: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 749: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 750: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 751: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 752: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 753: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 754: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 755: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 756: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 757: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 758: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 759: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 760: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 761: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 762: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 763: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 764: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 765: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 766: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 767: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 768: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 769: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 770: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 771: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 772: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 773: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 774: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 775: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 776: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 777: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 778: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 779: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 780: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 781: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 782: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 783: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 784: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 785: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 786: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 787: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 788: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 789: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 790: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 791: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 792: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 793: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 794: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 795: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 796: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 797: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 798: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 799: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 800: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 801: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 802: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 803: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 804: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 805: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 806: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 807: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 808: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 809: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 810: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 811: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 812: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 813: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 814: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 815: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 816: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 817: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 818: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 819: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 820: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 821: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 822: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 823: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 824: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 825: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 826: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 827: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 828: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 829: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 830: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 831: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 832: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 833: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 834: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 835: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 836: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 837: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 838: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 839: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 840: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 841: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 842: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 843: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 844: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 845: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 846: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 847: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 848: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 849: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 850: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 851: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 852: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 853: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 854: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 855: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 856: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 857: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 858: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 859: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 860: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 861: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 862: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 863: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 864: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 865: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 866: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 867: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 868: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 869: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 870: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 871: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 872: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 873: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 874: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 875: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 876: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 877: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 878: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 879: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 880: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 881: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 882: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 883: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 884: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 885: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 886: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 887: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 888: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 889: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 890: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 891: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 892: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 893: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 894: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 895: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 896: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 897: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 898: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 899: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 900: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 901: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 902: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 903: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 904: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 905: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 906: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 907: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 908: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 909: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 910: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 911: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 912: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 913: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 914: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 915: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 916: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 917: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 918: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 919: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 920: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 921: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 922: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 923: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 924: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 925: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 926: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 927: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 928: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 929: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 930: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 931: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 932: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 933: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 934: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 935: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 936: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 937: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 938: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 939: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 940: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 941: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 942: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 943: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 944: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 945: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 946: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 947: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 948: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 949: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 950: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 951: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 952: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 953: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 954: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 955: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 956: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 957: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 958: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 959: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 960: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 961: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 962: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 963: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 964: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 965: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 966: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 967: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 968: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 969: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 970: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 971: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 972: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 973: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 974: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 975: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 976: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 977: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 978: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 979: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 980: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 981: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 982: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 983: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 984: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 985: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 986: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 987: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 988: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 989: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 990: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 991: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 992: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 993: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 994: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 995: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 996: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 997: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 998: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 999: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1000: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1001: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1002: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1003: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1004: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1005: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 1006: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1007: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1008: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1009: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1010: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1011: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1012: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1013: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1014: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1015: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 1016: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1017: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1018: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1019: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1020: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1021: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1022: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1023: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1024: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1025: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1026: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1027: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1028: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1029: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1030: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1031: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1032: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1033: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1034: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1035: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1036: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1037: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1038: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1039: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1040: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1041: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1042: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1043: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1044: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1045: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1046: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1047: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1048: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1049: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1050: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1051: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1052: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1053: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1054: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1055: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1056: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1057: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1058: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1059: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1060: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1061: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1062: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1063: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1064: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1065: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1066: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1067: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1068: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1069: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1070: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1071: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1072: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1073: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1074: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1075: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1076: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1077: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1078: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1079: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1080: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1081: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1082: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1083: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1084: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1085: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1086: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1087: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1088: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1089: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1090: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1091: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1092: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1093: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1094: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1095: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1096: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1097: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1098: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1099: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1100: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1101: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1102: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1103: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1104: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1105: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1106: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1107: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1108: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1109: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1110: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1111: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1112: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1113: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1114: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1115: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1116: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1117: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1118: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1119: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1120: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1121: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1122: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1123: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1124: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1125: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1126: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1127: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1128: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1129: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1130: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1131: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1132: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1133: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1134: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1135: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1136: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1137: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1138: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1139: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1140: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1141: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1142: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1143: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1144: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1145: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1146: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1147: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1148: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1149: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1150: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1151: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1152: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1153: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1154: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1155: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1156: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1157: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1158: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1159: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1160: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1161: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1162: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1163: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1164: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1165: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1166: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1167: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1168: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1169: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1170: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1171: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1172: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1173: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1174: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1175: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1176: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1177: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1178: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1179: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1180: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1181: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1182: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1183: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1184: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1185: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1186: dt=0.0172, 2 negative triangles 1187: dt=0.0172, 2 negative triangles 1188: dt=0.0172, 2 negative triangles 1189: dt=0.0172, 2 negative triangles 1190: 2 negative triangles writing spherical brain to ../surf/rh.sphere spherical transformation took 2.41 hours mris_sphere utimesec 29045.705381 mris_sphere stimesec 11.896191 mris_sphere ru_maxrss 712016 mris_sphere ru_ixrss 0 mris_sphere ru_idrss 0 mris_sphere ru_isrss 0 mris_sphere ru_minflt 124547 mris_sphere ru_majflt 0 mris_sphere ru_nswap 0 mris_sphere ru_inblock 0 mris_sphere ru_oublock 23272 mris_sphere ru_msgsnd 0 mris_sphere ru_msgrcv 0 mris_sphere ru_nsignals 0 mris_sphere ru_nvcsw 439879 mris_sphere ru_nivcsw 261830 FSRUNTIME@ mris_sphere 2.4069 hours 1 threads #-------------------------------------------- #@# Surf Reg lh Fri Jul 14 21:15:04 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_register -curv -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_register.lh.dat ../surf/lh.sphere /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif ../surf/lh.sphere.reg using smoothwm curvature for final alignment cwd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts cmdline mris_register -curv -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_register.lh.dat ../surf/lh.sphere /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif ../surf/lh.sphere.reg 0 inflated.H 1 sulc 2 smoothwm (computed) $Id: mris_register.c,v 1.64 2017/02/07 19:04:44 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading surface from ../surf/lh.sphere... reading template parameterization from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif... MRISregister() ------- max_passes = 4 min_degrees = 0.500000 max_degrees = 64.000000 nangles = 8 tol=5.0e-01, sigma=0.0, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=1, l_extern=10000.000, l_parea=0.200, l_nlarea=1.000, l_corr=1.000, l_dist=5.000 using quadratic fit line minimization complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 0.000000 desired_rms_height -1.000000 momentum 0.950000 nbhd_size -10 max_nbrs 10 niterations 25 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 16 (10) use curv 16 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 1 mris->hemisphere 0 randomSeed 0 tol=5.0e-01, sigma=0.0, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=1, l_extern=10000.000, l_parea=0.200, l_nlarea=1.000, l_corr=1.000, l_dist=5.000 using quadratic fit line minimization -------------------- 1 Reading lh.sulc curvature mean = 0.000, std = 4.731 curvature mean = 0.020, std = 0.811 curvature mean = 0.053, std = 0.789 Starting MRISrigidBodyAlignGlobal() d=64.00 min @ (0.00, -16.00, 0.00) sse = 1029586.2, tmin=4.1493 d=32.00 min @ (8.00, 8.00, 0.00) sse = 998925.4, tmin=8.1758 d=16.00 min @ (-4.00, -4.00, 0.00) sse = 976866.3, tmin=12.2900 d=8.00 min @ (2.00, 0.00, -2.00) sse = 973484.2, tmin=16.4290 d=4.00 min @ (0.00, 1.00, 1.00) sse = 971739.6, tmin=20.5991 d=2.00 min @ (0.00, -0.50, 0.00) sse = 971368.5, tmin=24.7778 d=1.00 min @ (0.00, 0.00, -0.25) sse = 971340.8, tmin=29.1386 d=0.50 min @ (0.12, 0.12, 0.00) sse = 971304.6, tmin=33.5879 tol=1.0e+00, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=1, l_extern=10000.000, l_parea=0.200, l_nlarea=1.000, l_corr=0.050, l_spring=0.500, l_dist=5.000 using quadratic fit line minimization MRISrigidBodyAlignGlobal() done 33.59 min curvature mean = 0.009, std = 0.777 curvature mean = 0.030, std = 0.898 curvature mean = 0.004, std = 0.762 curvature mean = 0.015, std = 0.937 curvature mean = 0.002, std = 0.749 curvature mean = 0.005, std = 0.954 2 Reading smoothwm curvature mean = -0.154, std = 39.926 curvature mean = 0.040, std = 0.231 curvature mean = 0.003, std = 0.004 curvature mean = 0.041, std = 0.284 curvature mean = 0.002, std = 0.020 curvature mean = 0.044, std = 0.302 curvature mean = 0.002, std = 0.020 curvature mean = 0.044, std = 0.312 curvature mean = 0.001, std = 0.038 MRISregister() return, current seed 0 -01: dt=0.0000, 49487 negative triangles 223: dt=0.9900, 49487 negative triangles 224: dt=0.9900, 43617 negative triangles 225: dt=0.9900, 42766 negative triangles 226: dt=0.9900, 42273 negative triangles 227: dt=0.9900, 42417 negative triangles 228: dt=0.9900, 42574 negative triangles 229: dt=0.9900, 42806 negative triangles 230: dt=0.9900, 42983 negative triangles 231: dt=0.9900, 42955 negative triangles 232: dt=0.9900, 43168 negative triangles 233: dt=0.9900, 43069 negative triangles 234: dt=0.9900, 42956 negative triangles 235: dt=0.9900, 42781 negative triangles 236: dt=0.9405, 42875 negative triangles 237: dt=0.9405, 42488 negative triangles 238: dt=0.9405, 42575 negative triangles 239: dt=0.9405, 42405 negative triangles 240: dt=0.9405, 42412 negative triangles 241: dt=0.9405, 42073 negative triangles 242: dt=0.9405, 42145 negative triangles 243: dt=0.9405, 41892 negative triangles 244: dt=0.9405, 41865 negative triangles 245: dt=0.9405, 41678 negative triangles 246: dt=0.9405, 41550 negative triangles 247: dt=0.9405, 41348 negative triangles 248: dt=0.9405, 41324 negative triangles 249: dt=0.9405, 41187 negative triangles 250: dt=0.9405, 41083 negative triangles 251: dt=0.9405, 40988 negative triangles 252: dt=0.9405, 40902 negative triangles 253: dt=0.9405, 40801 negative triangles 254: dt=0.9405, 40669 negative triangles 255: dt=0.9405, 40540 negative triangles 256: dt=0.9405, 40547 negative triangles 257: dt=0.9405, 40487 negative triangles 258: dt=0.9405, 40371 negative triangles 259: dt=0.9405, 40299 negative triangles 260: dt=0.9405, 40275 negative triangles 261: dt=0.9405, 40176 negative triangles 262: dt=0.9405, 40127 negative triangles 263: dt=0.9405, 40009 negative triangles 264: dt=0.9405, 39946 negative triangles 265: dt=0.9405, 39818 negative triangles 266: dt=0.9405, 39902 negative triangles 267: dt=0.9405, 39643 negative triangles 268: dt=0.9405, 39659 negative triangles 269: dt=0.9405, 39586 negative triangles 270: dt=0.9405, 39663 negative triangles 271: dt=0.9405, 39526 negative triangles 272: dt=0.9405, 39436 negative triangles 273: dt=0.9405, 39386 negative triangles 274: dt=0.9405, 39418 negative triangles 275: dt=0.9405, 39343 negative triangles 276: dt=0.9405, 39318 negative triangles 277: dt=0.9405, 39159 negative triangles 278: dt=0.9405, 39207 negative triangles 279: dt=0.9405, 39084 negative triangles 280: dt=0.9405, 39054 negative triangles 281: dt=0.9405, 39084 negative triangles 282: dt=0.9405, 39089 negative triangles 283: dt=0.9405, 38883 negative triangles 284: dt=0.9405, 39005 negative triangles 285: dt=0.9405, 38808 negative triangles 286: dt=0.9405, 38777 negative triangles 287: dt=0.9405, 38722 negative triangles 288: dt=0.9405, 38702 negative triangles 289: dt=0.9405, 38639 negative triangles 290: dt=0.9405, 38688 negative triangles 291: dt=0.9405, 38523 negative triangles 292: dt=0.9405, 38633 negative triangles 293: dt=0.9405, 38617 negative triangles 294: dt=0.9405, 38589 negative triangles 295: dt=0.9405, 38475 negative triangles 296: dt=0.9405, 38331 negative triangles 297: dt=0.9405, 38363 negative triangles 298: dt=0.9405, 38292 negative triangles 299: dt=0.9405, 38242 negative triangles 300: dt=0.9405, 38242 negative triangles 301: dt=0.9405, 38182 negative triangles 302: dt=0.9405, 38143 negative triangles 303: dt=0.9405, 38129 negative triangles 304: dt=0.9405, 38095 negative triangles 305: dt=0.9405, 38132 negative triangles 306: dt=0.9405, 38016 negative triangles 307: dt=0.9405, 38009 negative triangles 308: dt=0.9405, 37919 negative triangles 309: dt=0.9405, 37908 negative triangles 310: dt=0.9405, 37850 negative triangles 311: dt=0.9405, 37856 negative triangles 312: dt=0.9405, 37870 negative triangles 313: dt=0.9405, 37684 negative triangles 314: dt=0.9405, 37828 negative triangles 315: dt=0.9405, 37722 negative triangles 316: dt=0.9405, 37703 negative triangles 317: dt=0.9405, 37714 negative triangles 318: dt=0.9405, 37629 negative triangles 319: dt=0.9405, 37750 negative triangles 320: dt=0.9405, 37620 negative triangles 321: dt=0.9405, 37590 negative triangles 322: dt=0.9405, 37625 negative triangles 323: dt=0.9405, 37715 negative triangles 324: dt=0.9405, 37630 negative triangles 325: dt=0.9405, 37531 negative triangles 326: dt=0.9405, 37540 negative triangles 327: dt=0.9405, 37510 negative triangles 328: dt=0.9405, 37530 negative triangles 329: dt=0.9405, 37474 negative triangles 330: dt=0.9405, 37482 negative triangles 331: dt=0.9405, 37407 negative triangles 332: dt=0.9405, 37481 negative triangles 333: dt=0.9405, 37420 negative triangles 334: dt=0.9405, 37412 negative triangles 335: dt=0.9405, 37356 negative triangles 336: dt=0.9405, 37326 negative triangles 337: dt=0.9405, 37300 negative triangles 338: dt=0.9405, 37272 negative triangles 339: dt=0.9405, 37130 negative triangles 340: dt=0.9405, 37200 negative triangles 341: dt=0.9405, 37251 negative triangles 342: dt=0.9405, 37235 negative triangles 343: dt=0.9405, 37217 negative triangles 344: dt=0.9405, 37159 negative triangles 345: dt=0.9405, 37094 negative triangles 346: dt=0.9405, 37066 negative triangles 347: dt=0.9405, 36975 negative triangles 348: dt=0.9405, 37118 negative triangles 349: dt=0.9405, 36978 negative triangles 350: dt=0.9405, 37011 negative triangles 351: dt=0.9405, 36968 negative triangles 352: dt=0.9405, 37088 negative triangles 353: dt=0.9405, 36980 negative triangles 354: dt=0.9405, 36971 negative triangles 355: dt=0.9405, 36941 negative triangles 356: dt=0.9405, 36978 negative triangles 357: dt=0.9405, 36865 negative triangles 358: dt=0.9405, 36907 negative triangles 359: dt=0.9405, 36723 negative triangles 360: dt=0.9405, 36855 negative triangles 361: dt=0.9405, 36756 negative triangles 362: dt=0.9405, 36718 negative triangles 363: dt=0.9405, 36808 negative triangles 364: dt=0.9405, 36806 negative triangles 365: dt=0.9405, 36629 negative triangles 366: dt=0.9405, 36780 negative triangles 367: dt=0.9405, 36720 negative triangles 368: dt=0.9405, 36696 negative triangles 369: dt=0.9405, 36572 negative triangles 370: dt=0.9405, 36668 negative triangles 371: dt=0.9405, 36579 negative triangles 372: dt=0.9405, 36663 negative triangles 373: dt=0.9405, 36570 negative triangles 374: dt=0.9405, 36513 negative triangles 375: dt=0.9405, 36594 negative triangles 376: dt=0.9405, 36558 negative triangles 377: dt=0.9405, 36516 negative triangles 378: dt=0.9405, 36514 negative triangles 379: dt=0.9405, 36363 negative triangles 380: dt=0.9405, 36460 negative triangles 381: dt=0.9405, 36368 negative triangles 382: dt=0.9405, 36382 negative triangles 383: dt=0.9405, 36260 negative triangles 384: dt=0.9405, 36418 negative triangles 385: dt=0.9405, 36386 negative triangles 386: dt=0.9405, 36442 negative triangles 387: dt=0.9405, 36324 negative triangles 388: dt=0.9405, 36421 negative triangles 389: dt=0.9405, 36309 negative triangles 390: dt=0.9405, 36374 negative triangles 391: dt=0.9405, 36214 negative triangles 392: dt=0.9405, 36332 negative triangles 393: dt=0.9405, 36239 negative triangles 394: dt=0.9405, 36219 negative triangles 395: dt=0.9405, 36203 negative triangles 396: dt=0.9405, 36239 negative triangles 397: dt=0.9405, 36168 negative triangles 398: dt=0.9405, 36192 negative triangles 399: dt=0.9405, 36112 negative triangles 400: dt=0.9405, 36154 negative triangles 401: dt=0.9405, 36024 negative triangles 402: dt=0.9405, 36187 negative triangles 403: dt=0.9405, 36115 negative triangles 404: dt=0.9405, 36101 negative triangles 405: dt=0.9405, 36115 negative triangles 406: dt=0.9405, 36186 negative triangles 407: dt=0.9405, 36034 negative triangles 408: dt=0.9405, 36149 negative triangles 409: dt=0.9405, 36033 negative triangles 410: dt=0.9405, 36170 negative triangles 411: dt=0.8935, 36119 negative triangles 412: dt=0.8935, 36151 negative triangles 413: dt=0.8935, 36032 negative triangles 414: dt=0.8935, 36085 negative triangles 415: dt=0.8935, 36088 negative triangles 416: dt=0.8935, 36181 negative triangles 417: dt=0.8935, 36018 negative triangles 418: dt=0.8935, 36164 negative triangles 419: dt=0.8935, 35975 negative triangles 420: dt=0.8935, 36145 negative triangles 421: dt=0.8935, 35998 negative triangles 422: dt=0.8935, 36099 negative triangles 423: dt=0.8935, 36027 negative triangles 424: dt=0.8935, 36021 negative triangles 425: dt=0.8935, 36015 negative triangles 426: dt=0.8935, 36087 negative triangles 427: dt=0.8935, 36045 negative triangles 428: dt=0.8935, 36052 negative triangles 429: dt=0.8488, 36064 negative triangles 430: dt=0.8488, 35969 negative triangles 431: dt=0.8488, 35994 negative triangles 432: dt=0.8488, 35985 negative triangles 433: dt=0.8488, 35962 negative triangles 434: dt=0.8488, 36009 negative triangles 435: dt=0.8488, 35943 negative triangles 436: dt=0.8488, 35946 negative triangles 437: dt=0.8488, 35828 negative triangles 438: dt=0.8488, 35992 negative triangles 439: dt=0.8488, 35953 negative triangles 440: dt=0.8488, 35947 negative triangles 441: dt=0.8488, 35922 negative triangles 442: dt=0.8488, 35906 negative triangles 443: dt=0.8488, 35876 negative triangles 444: dt=0.8488, 35891 negative triangles 445: dt=0.8488, 35778 negative triangles 446: dt=0.8488, 35902 negative triangles 447: dt=0.8488, 35871 negative triangles 448: dt=0.8488, 35843 negative triangles 449: dt=0.8488, 35795 negative triangles 450: dt=0.8488, 35939 negative triangles 451: dt=0.8488, 35731 negative triangles 452: dt=0.8488, 35826 negative triangles 453: dt=0.8488, 35686 negative triangles 454: dt=0.8488, 35713 negative triangles 455: dt=0.8488, 35638 negative triangles 456: dt=0.8488, 35701 negative triangles 457: dt=0.8488, 35662 negative triangles 458: dt=0.8488, 35633 negative triangles 459: dt=0.8488, 35600 negative triangles 460: dt=0.8488, 35618 negative triangles 461: dt=0.8488, 35556 negative triangles 462: dt=0.8488, 35632 negative triangles 463: dt=0.8488, 35541 negative triangles 464: dt=0.8488, 35639 negative triangles 465: dt=0.8488, 35592 negative triangles 466: dt=0.8488, 35511 negative triangles 467: dt=0.8488, 35549 negative triangles 468: dt=0.8488, 35572 negative triangles 469: dt=0.8488, 35472 negative triangles 470: dt=0.8488, 35592 negative triangles 471: dt=0.8488, 35547 negative triangles 472: dt=0.8488, 35545 negative triangles 473: dt=0.8488, 35527 negative triangles 474: dt=0.8488, 35574 negative triangles 475: dt=0.8488, 35499 negative triangles 476: dt=0.8488, 35471 negative triangles 477: dt=0.8488, 35542 negative triangles 478: dt=0.8488, 35462 negative triangles 479: dt=0.8488, 35411 negative triangles 480: dt=0.8488, 35546 negative triangles 481: dt=0.8488, 35392 negative triangles 482: dt=0.8488, 35450 negative triangles 483: dt=0.8488, 35427 negative triangles 484: dt=0.8488, 35447 negative triangles 485: dt=0.8488, 35334 negative triangles 486: dt=0.8488, 35485 negative triangles 487: dt=0.8488, 35354 negative triangles 488: dt=0.8488, 35402 negative triangles 489: dt=0.8488, 35352 negative triangles 490: dt=0.8488, 35385 negative triangles 491: dt=0.8488, 35337 negative triangles 492: dt=0.8488, 35343 negative triangles 493: dt=0.8488, 35309 negative triangles 494: dt=0.8488, 35287 negative triangles 495: dt=0.8488, 35272 negative triangles 496: dt=0.8488, 35274 negative triangles 497: dt=0.8488, 35218 negative triangles 498: dt=0.8488, 35314 negative triangles 499: dt=0.8488, 35232 negative triangles 500: dt=0.8488, 35193 negative triangles 501: dt=0.8488, 35214 negative triangles 502: dt=0.8488, 35153 negative triangles 503: dt=0.8488, 35186 negative triangles 504: dt=0.8488, 35132 negative triangles 505: dt=0.8488, 35147 negative triangles 506: dt=0.8488, 35147 negative triangles 507: dt=0.8488, 35104 negative triangles 508: dt=0.8488, 35141 negative triangles 509: dt=0.8488, 35091 negative triangles 510: dt=0.8488, 35146 negative triangles 511: dt=0.8488, 35051 negative triangles 512: dt=0.8488, 35083 negative triangles 513: dt=0.8488, 35125 negative triangles 514: dt=0.8488, 35103 negative triangles 515: dt=0.8488, 34962 negative triangles 516: dt=0.8488, 35137 negative triangles 517: dt=0.8488, 35042 negative triangles 518: dt=0.8488, 35119 negative triangles 519: dt=0.8488, 34942 negative triangles 520: dt=0.8488, 35135 negative triangles 521: dt=0.8488, 34984 negative triangles 522: dt=0.8488, 35056 negative triangles 523: dt=0.8488, 34975 negative triangles 524: dt=0.8488, 35072 negative triangles 525: dt=0.8488, 34956 negative triangles 526: dt=0.8488, 34955 negative triangles 527: dt=0.8488, 34899 negative triangles 528: dt=0.8488, 34973 negative triangles 529: dt=0.8488, 34920 negative triangles 530: dt=0.8488, 34966 negative triangles 531: dt=0.8488, 34841 negative triangles 532: dt=0.8488, 34879 negative triangles 533: dt=0.8488, 34884 negative triangles 534: dt=0.8488, 34959 negative triangles 535: dt=0.8488, 34892 negative triangles 536: dt=0.8488, 34884 negative triangles 537: dt=0.8488, 34905 negative triangles 538: dt=0.8488, 34852 negative triangles 539: dt=0.8488, 34805 negative triangles 540: dt=0.8488, 34900 negative triangles 541: dt=0.8488, 34789 negative triangles 542: dt=0.8488, 34829 negative triangles 543: dt=0.8488, 34780 negative triangles 544: dt=0.8488, 34846 negative triangles 545: dt=0.8488, 34759 negative triangles 546: dt=0.8488, 34758 negative triangles 547: dt=0.8488, 34748 negative triangles 548: dt=0.8488, 34752 negative triangles 549: dt=0.8488, 34717 negative triangles 550: dt=0.8488, 34789 negative triangles 551: dt=0.8488, 34651 negative triangles 552: dt=0.8488, 34697 negative triangles 553: dt=0.8488, 34638 negative triangles 554: dt=0.8488, 34676 negative triangles 555: dt=0.8488, 34688 negative triangles 556: dt=0.8488, 34719 negative triangles 557: dt=0.8488, 34652 negative triangles 558: dt=0.8488, 34672 negative triangles 559: dt=0.8488, 34591 negative triangles 560: dt=0.8488, 34615 negative triangles 561: dt=0.8488, 34632 negative triangles 562: dt=0.8488, 34591 negative triangles 563: dt=0.8488, 34524 negative triangles 564: dt=0.8488, 34554 negative triangles 565: dt=0.8488, 34492 negative triangles 566: dt=0.8488, 34612 negative triangles 567: dt=0.8488, 34570 negative triangles 568: dt=0.8488, 34530 negative triangles 569: dt=0.8488, 34480 negative triangles 570: dt=0.8488, 34577 negative triangles 571: dt=0.8488, 34515 negative triangles 572: dt=0.8488, 34649 negative triangles 573: dt=0.8488, 34593 negative triangles 574: dt=0.8488, 34492 negative triangles 575: dt=0.8488, 34536 negative triangles 576: dt=0.8488, 34517 negative triangles 577: dt=0.8488, 34430 negative triangles 578: dt=0.8488, 34421 negative triangles 579: dt=0.8488, 34503 negative triangles 580: dt=0.8488, 34426 negative triangles 581: dt=0.8488, 34353 negative triangles 582: dt=0.8488, 34523 negative triangles 583: dt=0.8488, 34487 negative triangles 584: dt=0.8488, 34403 negative triangles 585: dt=0.8488, 34433 negative triangles 586: dt=0.8488, 34401 negative triangles 587: dt=0.8488, 34314 negative triangles 588: dt=0.8488, 34471 negative triangles 589: dt=0.8488, 34355 negative triangles 590: dt=0.8488, 34315 negative triangles 591: dt=0.8488, 34296 negative triangles 592: dt=0.8488, 34307 negative triangles 593: dt=0.8488, 34315 negative triangles 594: dt=0.8488, 34367 negative triangles 595: dt=0.8488, 34186 negative triangles 596: dt=0.8488, 34255 negative triangles 597: dt=0.8488, 34234 negative triangles 598: dt=0.8488, 34196 negative triangles 599: dt=0.8488, 34141 negative triangles 600: dt=0.8488, 34265 negative triangles 601: dt=0.8488, 34232 negative triangles 602: dt=0.8488, 34202 negative triangles 603: dt=0.8488, 34115 negative triangles 604: dt=0.8488, 34238 negative triangles 605: dt=0.8488, 34158 negative triangles 606: dt=0.8488, 34222 negative triangles 607: dt=0.8488, 34186 negative triangles 608: dt=0.8488, 34207 negative triangles 609: dt=0.8488, 34113 negative triangles 610: dt=0.8488, 34126 negative triangles 611: dt=0.8488, 34074 negative triangles 612: dt=0.8488, 34072 negative triangles 613: dt=0.8488, 34112 negative triangles 614: dt=0.8488, 34119 negative triangles 615: dt=0.8488, 34103 negative triangles 616: dt=0.8488, 34103 negative triangles 617: dt=0.8488, 34025 negative triangles 618: dt=0.8488, 34083 negative triangles 619: dt=0.8488, 34092 negative triangles 620: dt=0.8488, 33976 negative triangles 621: dt=0.8488, 33987 negative triangles 622: dt=0.8488, 34072 negative triangles 623: dt=0.8488, 33961 negative triangles 624: dt=0.8488, 34055 negative triangles 625: dt=0.8488, 33989 negative triangles 626: dt=0.8488, 33927 negative triangles 627: dt=0.8488, 33896 negative triangles 628: dt=0.8488, 33929 negative triangles 629: dt=0.8488, 33926 negative triangles 630: dt=0.8488, 33876 negative triangles 631: dt=0.8488, 33913 negative triangles 632: dt=0.8488, 33856 negative triangles 633: dt=0.8488, 33843 negative triangles 634: dt=0.8488, 33938 negative triangles 635: dt=0.8488, 33799 negative triangles 636: dt=0.8488, 33805 negative triangles 637: dt=0.8488, 33851 negative triangles 638: dt=0.8488, 33840 negative triangles 639: dt=0.8488, 33794 negative triangles 640: dt=0.8488, 33853 negative triangles 641: dt=0.8488, 33811 negative triangles 642: dt=0.8488, 33788 negative triangles 643: dt=0.8488, 33767 negative triangles 644: dt=0.8488, 33761 negative triangles 645: dt=0.8488, 33758 negative triangles 646: dt=0.8488, 33722 negative triangles 647: dt=0.8488, 33701 negative triangles 648: dt=0.8488, 33750 negative triangles 649: dt=0.8488, 33748 negative triangles 650: dt=0.8488, 33811 negative triangles 651: dt=0.8488, 33706 negative triangles 652: dt=0.8488, 33789 negative triangles 653: dt=0.8488, 33688 negative triangles 654: dt=0.8488, 33802 negative triangles 655: dt=0.8488, 33687 negative triangles 656: dt=0.8488, 33658 negative triangles 657: dt=0.8488, 33611 negative triangles 658: dt=0.8488, 33673 negative triangles 659: dt=0.8488, 33611 negative triangles 660: dt=0.8488, 33659 negative triangles 661: dt=0.8488, 33660 negative triangles 662: dt=0.8488, 33661 negative triangles 663: dt=0.8488, 33589 negative triangles 664: dt=0.8488, 33642 negative triangles 665: dt=0.8488, 33508 negative triangles 666: dt=0.8488, 33629 negative triangles 667: dt=0.8488, 33528 negative triangles 668: dt=0.8488, 33639 negative triangles 669: dt=0.8488, 33586 negative triangles 670: dt=0.8488, 33637 negative triangles 671: dt=0.8488, 33617 negative triangles 672: dt=0.8488, 33685 negative triangles 673: dt=0.8488, 33589 negative triangles 674: dt=0.8488, 33648 negative triangles 675: dt=0.8064, 33632 negative triangles 676: dt=0.8064, 33629 negative triangles 677: dt=0.8064, 33691 negative triangles 678: dt=0.8064, 33681 negative triangles 679: dt=0.8064, 33601 negative triangles 680: dt=0.8064, 33642 negative triangles 681: dt=0.8064, 33627 negative triangles 682: dt=0.8064, 33621 negative triangles 683: dt=0.8064, 33617 negative triangles 684: dt=0.8064, 33620 negative triangles 685: dt=0.7660, 33676 negative triangles 686: dt=0.7660, 33549 negative triangles 687: dt=0.7660, 33587 negative triangles 688: dt=0.7660, 33577 negative triangles 689: dt=0.7660, 33539 negative triangles 690: dt=0.7660, 33643 negative triangles 691: dt=0.7660, 33530 negative triangles 692: dt=0.7660, 33586 negative triangles 693: dt=0.7660, 33483 negative triangles 694: dt=0.7660, 33518 negative triangles 695: dt=0.7660, 33528 negative triangles 696: dt=0.7660, 33579 negative triangles 697: dt=0.7660, 33544 negative triangles 698: dt=0.7660, 33615 negative triangles 699: dt=0.7660, 33504 negative triangles 700: dt=0.7660, 33540 negative triangles 701: dt=0.7660, 33500 negative triangles 702: dt=0.7660, 33535 negative triangles 703: dt=0.7277, 33526 negative triangles 704: dt=0.7277, 33515 negative triangles 705: dt=0.7277, 33471 negative triangles 706: dt=0.7277, 33554 negative triangles 707: dt=0.7277, 33563 negative triangles 708: dt=0.7277, 33598 negative triangles 709: dt=0.7277, 33543 negative triangles 710: dt=0.7277, 33555 negative triangles 711: dt=0.7277, 33481 negative triangles 712: dt=0.7277, 33562 negative triangles 713: dt=0.7277, 33605 negative triangles 714: dt=0.7277, 33626 negative triangles 715: dt=0.6914, 33471 negative triangles 716: dt=0.6914, 33472 negative triangles 717: dt=0.6914, 33519 negative triangles 718: dt=0.6914, 33466 negative triangles 719: dt=0.6914, 33464 negative triangles 720: dt=0.6914, 33495 negative triangles 721: dt=0.6914, 33446 negative triangles 722: dt=0.6914, 33519 negative triangles 723: dt=0.6914, 33433 negative triangles 724: dt=0.6914, 33488 negative triangles 725: dt=0.6914, 33513 negative triangles 726: dt=0.6914, 33505 negative triangles 727: dt=0.6914, 33525 negative triangles 728: dt=0.6914, 33452 negative triangles 729: dt=0.6914, 33482 negative triangles 730: dt=0.6914, 33456 negative triangles 731: dt=0.6914, 33482 negative triangles 732: dt=0.6914, 33513 negative triangles 733: dt=0.6568, 33508 negative triangles 734: dt=0.6568, 33479 negative triangles 735: dt=0.6568, 33472 negative triangles 736: dt=0.6568, 33498 negative triangles 737: dt=0.6568, 33467 negative triangles 738: dt=0.6568, 33511 negative triangles 739: dt=0.6568, 33439 negative triangles 740: dt=0.6568, 33443 negative triangles 741: dt=0.6568, 33461 negative triangles 742: dt=0.6568, 33487 negative triangles 743: dt=0.6239, 33473 negative triangles 744: dt=0.6239, 33515 negative triangles 745: dt=0.6239, 33472 negative triangles 746: dt=0.6239, 33478 negative triangles 747: dt=0.6239, 33446 negative triangles 748: dt=0.6239, 33483 negative triangles 749: dt=0.6239, 33442 negative triangles 750: dt=0.6239, 33416 negative triangles 751: dt=0.6239, 33471 negative triangles 752: dt=0.6239, 33428 negative triangles 753: dt=0.6239, 33416 negative triangles 754: dt=0.6239, 33443 negative triangles 755: dt=0.6239, 33435 negative triangles 756: dt=0.6239, 33477 negative triangles 757: dt=0.6239, 33399 negative triangles 758: dt=0.6239, 33429 negative triangles 759: dt=0.6239, 33446 negative triangles 760: dt=0.6239, 33450 negative triangles 761: dt=0.6239, 33456 negative triangles 762: dt=0.6239, 33465 negative triangles 763: dt=0.6239, 33385 negative triangles 764: dt=0.6239, 33428 negative triangles 765: dt=0.6239, 33412 negative triangles 766: dt=0.6239, 33410 negative triangles 767: dt=0.6239, 33430 negative triangles 768: dt=0.6239, 33401 negative triangles 769: dt=0.6239, 33389 negative triangles 770: dt=0.6239, 33407 negative triangles 771: dt=0.6239, 33400 negative triangles 772: dt=0.6239, 33403 negative triangles 773: dt=0.6239, 33326 negative triangles 774: dt=0.6239, 33305 negative triangles 775: dt=0.6239, 33362 negative triangles 776: dt=0.6239, 33351 negative triangles 777: dt=0.6239, 33408 negative triangles 778: dt=0.6239, 33401 negative triangles 779: dt=0.6239, 33343 negative triangles 780: dt=0.6239, 33365 negative triangles 781: dt=0.6239, 33305 negative triangles 782: dt=0.6239, 33390 negative triangles 783: dt=0.6239, 33328 negative triangles 784: dt=0.5927, 33352 negative triangles 785: dt=0.5927, 33278 negative triangles 786: dt=0.5927, 33289 negative triangles 787: dt=0.5927, 33287 negative triangles 788: dt=0.5927, 33318 negative triangles 789: dt=0.5927, 33268 negative triangles 790: dt=0.5927, 33341 negative triangles 791: dt=0.5927, 33245 negative triangles 792: dt=0.5927, 33310 negative triangles 793: dt=0.5927, 33315 negative triangles 794: dt=0.5927, 33329 negative triangles 795: dt=0.5927, 33329 negative triangles 796: dt=0.5927, 33321 negative triangles 797: dt=0.5927, 33355 negative triangles 798: dt=0.5927, 33306 negative triangles 799: dt=0.5927, 33380 negative triangles 800: dt=0.5927, 33372 negative triangles 801: dt=0.5631, 33333 negative triangles 802: dt=0.5631, 33380 negative triangles 803: dt=0.5631, 33322 negative triangles 804: dt=0.5631, 33401 negative triangles 805: dt=0.5631, 33352 negative triangles 806: dt=0.5631, 33407 negative triangles 807: dt=0.5631, 33295 negative triangles 808: dt=0.5631, 33385 negative triangles 809: dt=0.5631, 33343 negative triangles 810: dt=0.5631, 33366 negative triangles 811: dt=0.5350, 33326 negative triangles 812: dt=0.5350, 33285 negative triangles 813: dt=0.5350, 33333 negative triangles 814: dt=0.5350, 33333 negative triangles 815: dt=0.5350, 33282 negative triangles 816: dt=0.5350, 33328 negative triangles 817: dt=0.5350, 33302 negative triangles 818: dt=0.5350, 33343 negative triangles 819: dt=0.5350, 33340 negative triangles 820: dt=0.5350, 33314 negative triangles 821: dt=0.5082, 33332 negative triangles 822: dt=0.5082, 33283 negative triangles 823: dt=0.5082, 33251 negative triangles 824: dt=0.5082, 33297 negative triangles 825: dt=0.5082, 33302 negative triangles 826: dt=0.5082, 33290 negative triangles 827: dt=0.5082, 33307 negative triangles 828: dt=0.5082, 33281 negative triangles 829: dt=0.5082, 33249 negative triangles 830: dt=0.5082, 33334 negative triangles 831: dt=0.4828, 33265 negative triangles 832: dt=0.4828, 33358 negative triangles 833: dt=0.4828, 33311 negative triangles 834: dt=0.4828, 33312 negative triangles 835: dt=0.4828, 33304 negative triangles 836: dt=0.4828, 33344 negative triangles 837: dt=0.4828, 33274 negative triangles 838: dt=0.4828, 33287 negative triangles 839: dt=0.4828, 33290 negative triangles 840: dt=0.4828, 33248 negative triangles 841: dt=0.4587, 33279 negative triangles expanding nbhd size to 1 842: dt=0.9900, 33332 negative triangles 843: dt=0.9900, 32939 negative triangles 844: dt=0.9900, 32489 negative triangles 845: dt=0.9900, 32382 negative triangles 846: dt=0.9900, 32286 negative triangles 847: dt=0.9900, 32243 negative triangles 848: dt=0.9900, 32140 negative triangles 849: dt=0.9900, 32083 negative triangles 850: dt=0.9900, 32081 negative triangles 851: dt=0.9900, 32077 negative triangles 852: dt=0.9900, 32049 negative triangles 853: dt=0.9900, 32067 negative triangles 854: dt=0.9900, 31989 negative triangles 855: dt=0.9900, 32077 negative triangles 856: dt=0.9900, 32026 negative triangles 857: dt=0.9900, 32076 negative triangles 858: dt=0.9900, 32005 negative triangles 859: dt=0.9900, 31975 negative triangles 860: dt=0.9900, 31967 negative triangles 861: dt=0.9900, 31974 negative triangles 862: dt=0.9900, 32013 negative triangles 863: dt=0.9900, 32031 negative triangles 864: dt=0.9900, 31960 negative triangles 865: dt=0.9900, 31958 negative triangles 866: dt=0.9900, 31937 negative triangles 867: dt=0.9900, 31951 negative triangles 868: dt=0.9900, 31910 negative triangles 869: dt=0.9900, 31949 negative triangles 870: dt=0.9900, 31951 negative triangles 871: dt=0.9900, 31935 negative triangles 872: dt=0.9900, 31959 negative triangles 873: dt=0.9900, 31931 negative triangles 874: dt=0.9900, 31893 negative triangles 875: dt=0.9900, 31881 negative triangles 876: dt=0.9900, 31856 negative triangles 877: dt=0.9900, 31882 negative triangles 878: dt=0.9900, 31859 negative triangles 879: dt=0.9900, 31870 negative triangles 880: dt=0.9900, 31837 negative triangles 881: dt=0.9900, 31861 negative triangles 882: dt=0.9900, 31845 negative triangles 883: dt=0.9900, 31862 negative triangles 884: dt=0.9900, 31830 negative triangles 885: dt=0.9900, 31830 negative triangles 886: dt=0.9900, 31793 negative triangles 887: dt=0.9900, 31759 negative triangles 888: dt=0.9900, 31718 negative triangles 889: dt=0.9900, 31735 negative triangles 890: dt=0.9900, 31756 negative triangles 891: dt=0.9900, 31733 negative triangles 892: dt=0.9900, 31673 negative triangles 893: dt=0.9900, 31658 negative triangles 894: dt=0.9900, 31662 negative triangles 895: dt=0.9900, 31602 negative triangles 896: dt=0.9900, 31604 negative triangles 897: dt=0.9900, 31594 negative triangles 898: dt=0.9900, 31587 negative triangles 899: dt=0.9900, 31569 negative triangles 900: dt=0.9900, 31563 negative triangles 901: dt=0.9900, 31535 negative triangles 902: dt=0.9900, 31474 negative triangles 903: dt=0.9900, 31507 negative triangles 904: dt=0.9900, 31454 negative triangles 905: dt=0.9900, 31458 negative triangles 906: dt=0.9900, 31415 negative triangles 907: dt=0.9900, 31432 negative triangles 908: dt=0.9900, 31395 negative triangles 909: dt=0.9900, 31370 negative triangles 910: dt=0.9900, 31368 negative triangles 911: dt=0.9900, 31384 negative triangles 912: dt=0.9900, 31324 negative triangles 913: dt=0.9900, 31317 negative triangles 914: dt=0.9900, 31332 negative triangles 915: dt=0.9900, 31322 negative triangles 916: dt=0.9900, 31300 negative triangles 917: dt=0.9900, 31274 negative triangles 918: dt=0.9900, 31229 negative triangles 919: dt=0.9900, 31254 negative triangles 920: dt=0.9900, 31217 negative triangles 921: dt=0.9900, 31184 negative triangles 922: dt=0.9900, 31159 negative triangles 923: dt=0.9900, 31149 negative triangles 924: dt=0.9900, 31132 negative triangles 925: dt=0.9900, 31120 negative triangles 926: dt=0.9900, 31141 negative triangles 927: dt=0.9900, 31112 negative triangles 928: dt=0.9900, 31085 negative triangles 929: dt=0.9900, 31056 negative triangles 930: dt=0.9900, 31051 negative triangles 931: dt=0.9900, 31060 negative triangles 932: dt=0.9900, 31006 negative triangles 933: dt=0.9900, 31038 negative triangles 934: dt=0.9900, 31018 negative triangles 935: dt=0.9900, 30989 negative triangles 936: dt=0.9900, 30974 negative triangles 937: dt=0.9900, 30985 negative triangles 938: dt=0.9900, 30956 negative triangles 939: dt=0.9900, 30926 negative triangles 940: dt=0.9900, 30928 negative triangles 941: dt=0.9900, 30920 negative triangles 942: dt=0.9900, 30893 negative triangles 943: dt=0.9900, 30852 negative triangles 944: dt=0.9900, 30841 negative triangles 945: dt=0.9900, 30848 negative triangles 946: dt=0.9900, 30838 negative triangles 947: dt=0.9900, 30839 negative triangles 948: dt=0.9900, 30817 negative triangles 949: dt=0.9900, 30815 negative triangles 950: dt=0.9900, 30790 negative triangles 951: dt=0.9900, 30753 negative triangles 952: dt=0.9900, 30734 negative triangles 953: dt=0.9900, 30704 negative triangles 954: dt=0.9900, 30725 negative triangles 955: dt=0.9900, 30699 negative triangles 956: dt=0.9900, 30734 negative triangles 957: dt=0.9900, 30706 negative triangles 958: dt=0.9900, 30693 negative triangles 959: dt=0.9900, 30662 negative triangles 960: dt=0.9900, 30662 negative triangles 961: dt=0.9900, 30638 negative triangles 962: dt=0.9900, 30645 negative triangles 963: dt=0.9900, 30619 negative triangles 964: dt=0.9900, 30652 negative triangles 965: dt=0.9900, 30622 negative triangles 966: dt=0.9900, 30632 negative triangles 967: dt=0.9900, 30575 negative triangles 968: dt=0.9900, 30601 negative triangles 969: dt=0.9900, 30626 negative triangles 970: dt=0.9900, 30617 negative triangles 971: dt=0.9900, 30554 negative triangles 972: dt=0.9900, 30536 negative triangles 973: dt=0.9900, 30501 negative triangles 974: dt=0.9900, 30528 negative triangles 975: dt=0.9900, 30551 negative triangles 976: dt=0.9900, 30508 negative triangles 977: dt=0.9900, 30523 negative triangles 978: dt=0.9900, 30509 negative triangles 979: dt=0.9900, 30508 negative triangles 980: dt=0.9900, 30496 negative triangles 981: dt=0.9900, 30476 negative triangles 982: dt=0.9900, 30453 negative triangles 983: dt=0.9900, 30438 negative triangles 984: dt=0.9900, 30462 negative triangles 985: dt=0.9900, 30417 negative triangles 986: dt=0.9900, 30369 negative triangles 987: dt=0.9900, 30391 negative triangles 988: dt=0.9900, 30403 negative triangles 989: dt=0.9900, 30411 negative triangles 990: dt=0.9900, 30376 negative triangles 991: dt=0.9900, 30387 negative triangles 992: dt=0.9900, 30351 negative triangles 993: dt=0.9900, 30383 negative triangles 994: dt=0.9900, 30349 negative triangles 995: dt=0.9900, 30263 negative triangles 996: dt=0.9900, 30307 negative triangles 997: dt=0.9900, 30322 negative triangles 998: dt=0.9900, 30299 negative triangles 999: dt=0.9900, 30274 negative triangles 1000: dt=0.9900, 30287 negative triangles 1001: dt=0.9900, 30283 negative triangles 1002: dt=0.9900, 30288 negative triangles 1003: dt=0.9900, 30247 negative triangles 1004: dt=0.9900, 30247 negative triangles 1005: dt=0.9900, 30245 negative triangles 1006: dt=0.9900, 30217 negative triangles 1007: dt=0.9900, 30217 negative triangles 1008: dt=0.9900, 30193 negative triangles 1009: dt=0.9900, 30192 negative triangles 1010: dt=0.9900, 30152 negative triangles 1011: dt=0.9900, 30162 negative triangles 1012: dt=0.9900, 30129 negative triangles 1013: dt=0.9900, 30087 negative triangles 1014: dt=0.9900, 30103 negative triangles 1015: dt=0.9900, 30064 negative triangles 1016: dt=0.9900, 30085 negative triangles 1017: dt=0.9900, 30102 negative triangles 1018: dt=0.9900, 30048 negative triangles 1019: dt=0.9900, 30054 negative triangles 1020: dt=0.9900, 30046 negative triangles 1021: dt=0.9900, 30001 negative triangles 1022: dt=0.9900, 29994 negative triangles 1023: dt=0.9900, 29968 negative triangles 1024: dt=0.9900, 29954 negative triangles 1025: dt=0.9900, 30015 negative triangles 1026: dt=0.9900, 29980 negative triangles 1027: dt=0.9900, 29935 negative triangles 1028: dt=0.9900, 29915 negative triangles 1029: dt=0.9900, 29916 negative triangles 1030: dt=0.9900, 29922 negative triangles 1031: dt=0.9900, 29949 negative triangles 1032: dt=0.9900, 29861 negative triangles 1033: dt=0.9900, 29915 negative triangles 1034: dt=0.9900, 29904 negative triangles 1035: dt=0.9900, 29849 negative triangles 1036: dt=0.9900, 29818 negative triangles 1037: dt=0.9900, 29805 negative triangles 1038: dt=0.9900, 29779 negative triangles 1039: dt=0.9900, 29757 negative triangles 1040: dt=0.9900, 29799 negative triangles 1041: dt=0.9900, 29766 negative triangles 1042: dt=0.9900, 29752 negative triangles 1043: dt=0.9900, 29718 negative triangles 1044: dt=0.9900, 29747 negative triangles 1045: dt=0.9900, 29681 negative triangles 1046: dt=0.9900, 29678 negative triangles 1047: dt=0.9900, 29686 negative triangles 1048: dt=0.9900, 29681 negative triangles 1049: dt=0.9900, 29664 negative triangles 1050: dt=0.9900, 29632 negative triangles 1051: dt=0.9900, 29666 negative triangles 1052: dt=0.9900, 29657 negative triangles 1053: dt=0.9900, 29620 negative triangles 1054: dt=0.9900, 29604 negative triangles 1055: dt=0.9900, 29607 negative triangles 1056: dt=0.9900, 29615 negative triangles 1057: dt=0.9900, 29582 negative triangles 1058: dt=0.9900, 29574 negative triangles 1059: dt=0.9900, 29569 negative triangles 1060: dt=0.9900, 29550 negative triangles 1061: dt=0.9900, 29572 negative triangles 1062: dt=0.9900, 29487 negative triangles 1063: dt=0.9900, 29525 negative triangles 1064: dt=0.9900, 29490 negative triangles 1065: dt=0.9900, 29471 negative triangles 1066: dt=0.9900, 29459 negative triangles 1067: dt=0.9900, 29486 negative triangles 1068: dt=0.9900, 29457 negative triangles 1069: dt=0.9900, 29486 negative triangles 1070: dt=0.9900, 29482 negative triangles 1071: dt=0.9900, 29433 negative triangles 1072: dt=0.9900, 29451 negative triangles 1073: dt=0.9900, 29450 negative triangles 1074: dt=0.9900, 29403 negative triangles 1075: dt=0.9900, 29417 negative triangles 1076: dt=0.9900, 29396 negative triangles 1077: dt=0.9900, 29416 negative triangles 1078: dt=0.9900, 29390 negative triangles 1079: dt=0.9900, 29395 negative triangles 1080: dt=0.9900, 29385 negative triangles 1081: dt=0.9900, 29368 negative triangles 1082: dt=0.9900, 29330 negative triangles 1083: dt=0.9900, 29335 negative triangles 1084: dt=0.9900, 29371 negative triangles 1085: dt=0.9900, 29341 negative triangles 1086: dt=0.9900, 29344 negative triangles 1087: dt=0.9900, 29391 negative triangles 1088: dt=0.9900, 29328 negative triangles 1089: dt=0.9900, 29331 negative triangles 1090: dt=0.9900, 29300 negative triangles 1091: dt=0.9900, 29353 negative triangles 1092: dt=0.9900, 29306 negative triangles 1093: dt=0.9900, 29281 negative triangles 1094: dt=0.9900, 29270 negative triangles 1095: dt=0.9900, 29300 negative triangles 1096: dt=0.9900, 29303 negative triangles 1097: dt=0.9900, 29288 negative triangles 1098: dt=0.9900, 29318 negative triangles 1099: dt=0.9900, 29272 negative triangles 1100: dt=0.9900, 29279 negative triangles 1101: dt=0.9900, 29291 negative triangles 1102: dt=0.9900, 29288 negative triangles 1103: dt=0.9900, 29305 negative triangles 1104: dt=0.9405, 29281 negative triangles 1105: dt=0.9405, 29246 negative triangles 1106: dt=0.9405, 29211 negative triangles 1107: dt=0.9405, 29260 negative triangles 1108: dt=0.9405, 29226 negative triangles 1109: dt=0.9405, 29283 negative triangles 1110: dt=0.9405, 29237 negative triangles 1111: dt=0.9405, 29218 negative triangles 1112: dt=0.9405, 29220 negative triangles 1113: dt=0.9405, 29227 negative triangles 1114: dt=0.9405, 29208 negative triangles 1115: dt=0.9405, 29214 negative triangles 1116: dt=0.9405, 29235 negative triangles 1117: dt=0.9405, 29196 negative triangles 1118: dt=0.9405, 29191 negative triangles 1119: dt=0.9405, 29166 negative triangles 1120: dt=0.9405, 29217 negative triangles 1121: dt=0.9405, 29181 negative triangles 1122: dt=0.9405, 29163 negative triangles 1123: dt=0.9405, 29168 negative triangles 1124: dt=0.9405, 29181 negative triangles 1125: dt=0.9405, 29139 negative triangles 1126: dt=0.9405, 29136 negative triangles 1127: dt=0.9405, 29165 negative triangles 1128: dt=0.9405, 29111 negative triangles 1129: dt=0.9405, 29093 negative triangles 1130: dt=0.9405, 29161 negative triangles 1131: dt=0.9405, 29122 negative triangles 1132: dt=0.9405, 29131 negative triangles 1133: dt=0.9405, 29119 negative triangles 1134: dt=0.9405, 29109 negative triangles 1135: dt=0.9405, 29108 negative triangles 1136: dt=0.9405, 29074 negative triangles 1137: dt=0.9405, 29086 negative triangles 1138: dt=0.9405, 29101 negative triangles 1139: dt=0.9405, 29089 negative triangles 1140: dt=0.9405, 29076 negative triangles 1141: dt=0.9405, 29076 negative triangles 1142: dt=0.9405, 29060 negative triangles 1143: dt=0.9405, 29027 negative triangles 1144: dt=0.9405, 29000 negative triangles 1145: dt=0.9405, 29014 negative triangles 1146: dt=0.9405, 28992 negative triangles 1147: dt=0.9405, 29025 negative triangles 1148: dt=0.9405, 29003 negative triangles 1149: dt=0.9405, 28977 negative triangles 1150: dt=0.9405, 29022 negative triangles 1151: dt=0.9405, 29019 negative triangles 1152: dt=0.9405, 28998 negative triangles 1153: dt=0.9405, 28997 negative triangles 1154: dt=0.9405, 28977 negative triangles 1155: dt=0.9405, 28991 negative triangles 1156: dt=0.9405, 29000 negative triangles 1157: dt=0.9405, 29016 negative triangles 1158: dt=0.9405, 29004 negative triangles 1159: dt=0.9405, 28976 negative triangles 1160: dt=0.9405, 28942 negative triangles 1161: dt=0.9405, 28941 negative triangles 1162: dt=0.9405, 28969 negative triangles 1163: dt=0.9405, 28975 negative triangles 1164: dt=0.9405, 28913 negative triangles 1165: dt=0.9405, 28908 negative triangles 1166: dt=0.9405, 28937 negative triangles 1167: dt=0.9405, 28973 negative triangles 1168: dt=0.9405, 28952 negative triangles 1169: dt=0.9405, 28936 negative triangles 1170: dt=0.9405, 28908 negative triangles 1171: dt=0.9405, 28985 negative triangles 1172: dt=0.9405, 28959 negative triangles 1173: dt=0.9405, 28958 negative triangles 1174: dt=0.9405, 28949 negative triangles 1175: dt=0.8935, 28945 negative triangles 1176: dt=0.8935, 28893 negative triangles 1177: dt=0.8935, 28910 negative triangles 1178: dt=0.8935, 28920 negative triangles 1179: dt=0.8935, 28905 negative triangles 1180: dt=0.8935, 28937 negative triangles 1181: dt=0.8935, 28953 negative triangles 1182: dt=0.8935, 28911 negative triangles 1183: dt=0.8935, 28956 negative triangles 1184: dt=0.8935, 28918 negative triangles 1185: dt=0.8935, 28941 negative triangles 1186: dt=0.8488, 28932 negative triangles 1187: dt=0.8488, 28916 negative triangles 1188: dt=0.8488, 28928 negative triangles 1189: dt=0.8488, 28936 negative triangles 1190: dt=0.8488, 28915 negative triangles 1191: dt=0.8488, 28883 negative triangles 1192: dt=0.8488, 28887 negative triangles 1193: dt=0.8488, 28923 negative triangles 1194: dt=0.8488, 28912 negative triangles 1195: dt=0.8488, 28917 negative triangles 1196: dt=0.8488, 28895 negative triangles 1197: dt=0.8488, 28856 negative triangles 1198: dt=0.8488, 28888 negative triangles 1199: dt=0.8488, 28929 negative triangles 1200: dt=0.8488, 28842 negative triangles 1201: dt=0.8488, 28853 negative triangles 1202: dt=0.8488, 28849 negative triangles 1203: dt=0.8488, 28885 negative triangles 1204: dt=0.8488, 28856 negative triangles 1205: dt=0.8488, 28854 negative triangles 1206: dt=0.8488, 28849 negative triangles 1207: dt=0.8488, 28845 negative triangles 1208: dt=0.8488, 28850 negative triangles 1209: dt=0.8488, 28852 negative triangles 1210: dt=0.8488, 28827 negative triangles 1211: dt=0.8488, 28837 negative triangles 1212: dt=0.8488, 28822 negative triangles 1213: dt=0.8488, 28821 negative triangles 1214: dt=0.8488, 28809 negative triangles 1215: dt=0.8488, 28806 negative triangles 1216: dt=0.8488, 28837 negative triangles 1217: dt=0.8488, 28785 negative triangles 1218: dt=0.8488, 28770 negative triangles 1219: dt=0.8488, 28816 negative triangles 1220: dt=0.8488, 28815 negative triangles 1221: dt=0.8488, 28811 negative triangles 1222: dt=0.8488, 28777 negative triangles writing registered surface to ../surf/lh.sphere.reg... 1223: dt=0.8488, 28790 negative triangles 1224: 28785 negative triangles registration took 8.09 hours mris_register utimesec 87574.935586 mris_register stimesec 37.994224 mris_register ru_maxrss 673300 mris_register ru_ixrss 0 mris_register ru_idrss 0 mris_register ru_isrss 0 mris_register ru_minflt 95006 mris_register ru_majflt 0 mris_register ru_nswap 0 mris_register ru_inblock 5584 mris_register ru_oublock 28040 mris_register ru_msgsnd 0 mris_register ru_msgrcv 0 mris_register ru_nsignals 0 mris_register ru_nvcsw 1266485 mris_register ru_nivcsw 697773 FSRUNTIME@ mris_register 8.0897 hours 1 threads #-------------------------------------------- #@# Surf Reg rh Sat Jul 15 05:20:28 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_register -curv -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_register.rh.dat ../surf/rh.sphere /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif ../surf/rh.sphere.reg using smoothwm curvature for final alignment cwd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts cmdline mris_register -curv -rusage /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/touch/rusage.mris_register.rh.dat ../surf/rh.sphere /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif ../surf/rh.sphere.reg 0 inflated.H 1 sulc 2 smoothwm (computed) $Id: mris_register.c,v 1.64 2017/02/07 19:04:44 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading surface from ../surf/rh.sphere... reading template parameterization from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif... MRISregister() ------- max_passes = 4 min_degrees = 0.500000 max_degrees = 64.000000 nangles = 8 tol=5.0e-01, sigma=0.0, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=1, l_extern=10000.000, l_parea=0.200, l_nlarea=1.000, l_corr=1.000, l_dist=5.000 using quadratic fit line minimization complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 0.000000 desired_rms_height -1.000000 momentum 0.950000 nbhd_size -10 max_nbrs 10 niterations 25 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 16 (10) use curv 16 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 1 mris->hemisphere 1 randomSeed 0 tol=5.0e-01, sigma=0.0, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=1, l_extern=10000.000, l_parea=0.200, l_nlarea=1.000, l_corr=1.000, l_dist=5.000 using quadratic fit line minimization -------------------- 1 Reading rh.sulc curvature mean = -0.000, std = 5.108 curvature mean = -0.001, std = 0.800 curvature mean = 0.047, std = 0.814 Starting MRISrigidBodyAlignGlobal() d=32.00 min @ (-8.00, 0.00, 0.00) sse = 741810.4, tmin=6.7986 d=16.00 min @ (4.00, 0.00, 4.00) sse = 723549.0, tmin=10.2610 d=8.00 min @ (-2.00, 0.00, -2.00) sse = 717719.9, tmin=13.8138 d=4.00 min @ (0.00, 0.00, 1.00) sse = 716386.2, tmin=17.4298 d=2.00 min @ (0.50, 0.00, 0.00) sse = 715917.9, tmin=21.0991 d=1.00 min @ (0.00, 0.00, -0.25) sse = 715684.8, tmin=24.7345 d=0.50 min @ (-0.12, 0.00, 0.00) sse = 715670.4, tmin=28.3642 tol=1.0e+00, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=1024, nbrs=1, l_extern=10000.000, l_parea=0.200, l_nlarea=1.000, l_corr=0.050, l_spring=0.500, l_dist=5.000 using quadratic fit line minimization MRISrigidBodyAlignGlobal() done 28.36 min curvature mean = -0.022, std = 0.786 curvature mean = 0.020, std = 0.927 curvature mean = -0.030, std = 0.775 curvature mean = 0.008, std = 0.965 curvature mean = -0.034, std = 0.769 curvature mean = 0.002, std = 0.981 2 Reading smoothwm curvature mean = -0.051, std = 0.395 curvature mean = 0.024, std = 0.222 curvature mean = 0.072, std = 0.264 curvature mean = 0.021, std = 0.275 curvature mean = 0.041, std = 0.394 curvature mean = 0.020, std = 0.301 curvature mean = 0.024, std = 0.521 curvature mean = 0.021, std = 0.309 curvature mean = 0.010, std = 0.637 MRISregister() return, current seed 0 -01: dt=0.0000, 613 negative triangles 161: dt=0.9900, 613 negative triangles expanding nbhd size to 1 162: dt=0.9900, 749 negative triangles 163: dt=0.9900, 582 negative triangles 164: dt=0.9900, 551 negative triangles 165: dt=0.9900, 546 negative triangles 166: dt=0.9900, 523 negative triangles 167: dt=0.9900, 502 negative triangles 168: dt=0.9900, 467 negative triangles 169: dt=0.9900, 451 negative triangles 170: dt=0.9900, 445 negative triangles 171: dt=0.9900, 425 negative triangles 172: dt=0.9900, 393 negative triangles 173: dt=0.9900, 379 negative triangles 174: dt=0.9900, 360 negative triangles 175: dt=0.9900, 360 negative triangles 176: dt=0.9900, 350 negative triangles 177: dt=0.9900, 335 negative triangles 178: dt=0.9900, 330 negative triangles 179: dt=0.9900, 331 negative triangles 180: dt=0.9900, 324 negative triangles 181: dt=0.9900, 306 negative triangles 182: dt=0.9900, 307 negative triangles 183: dt=0.9900, 300 negative triangles 184: dt=0.9900, 290 negative triangles 185: dt=0.9900, 272 negative triangles 186: dt=0.9900, 284 negative triangles 187: dt=0.9900, 269 negative triangles 188: dt=0.9900, 263 negative triangles 189: dt=0.9900, 261 negative triangles 190: dt=0.9900, 255 negative triangles 191: dt=0.9900, 253 negative triangles 192: dt=0.9900, 242 negative triangles 193: dt=0.9900, 227 negative triangles 194: dt=0.9900, 230 negative triangles 195: dt=0.9900, 217 negative triangles 196: dt=0.9900, 217 negative triangles 197: dt=0.9900, 223 negative triangles 198: dt=0.9900, 211 negative triangles 199: dt=0.9900, 206 negative triangles 200: dt=0.9900, 204 negative triangles 201: dt=0.9900, 207 negative triangles 202: dt=0.9900, 204 negative triangles 203: dt=0.9900, 195 negative triangles 204: dt=0.9900, 194 negative triangles 205: dt=0.9900, 194 negative triangles 206: dt=0.9900, 198 negative triangles 207: dt=0.9900, 187 negative triangles 208: dt=0.9900, 174 negative triangles 209: dt=0.9900, 178 negative triangles 210: dt=0.9900, 178 negative triangles 211: dt=0.9900, 168 negative triangles 212: dt=0.9900, 164 negative triangles 213: dt=0.9900, 153 negative triangles 214: dt=0.9900, 154 negative triangles 215: dt=0.9900, 160 negative triangles 216: dt=0.9900, 154 negative triangles 217: dt=0.9900, 155 negative triangles 218: dt=0.9900, 154 negative triangles 219: dt=0.9900, 146 negative triangles 220: dt=0.9900, 145 negative triangles 221: dt=0.9900, 145 negative triangles 222: dt=0.9900, 145 negative triangles 223: dt=0.9900, 141 negative triangles 224: dt=0.9900, 138 negative triangles 225: dt=0.9900, 134 negative triangles 226: dt=0.9900, 142 negative triangles 227: dt=0.9900, 137 negative triangles 228: dt=0.9900, 132 negative triangles 229: dt=0.9900, 135 negative triangles 230: dt=0.9900, 129 negative triangles 231: dt=0.9900, 125 negative triangles 232: dt=0.9900, 124 negative triangles 233: dt=0.9900, 121 negative triangles 234: dt=0.9900, 123 negative triangles 235: dt=0.9900, 122 negative triangles 236: dt=0.9900, 122 negative triangles 237: dt=0.9900, 120 negative triangles 238: dt=0.9900, 114 negative triangles 239: dt=0.9900, 103 negative triangles 240: dt=0.9900, 104 negative triangles 241: dt=0.9900, 102 negative triangles 242: dt=0.9900, 103 negative triangles 243: dt=0.9900, 96 negative triangles 244: dt=0.9900, 101 negative triangles 245: dt=0.9900, 113 negative triangles 246: dt=0.9900, 94 negative triangles 247: dt=0.9900, 96 negative triangles 248: dt=0.9900, 90 negative triangles 249: dt=0.9900, 89 negative triangles 250: dt=0.9900, 89 negative triangles 251: dt=0.9900, 91 negative triangles 252: dt=0.9900, 90 negative triangles 253: dt=0.9900, 90 negative triangles 254: dt=0.9900, 86 negative triangles 255: dt=0.9900, 84 negative triangles 256: dt=0.9900, 81 negative triangles 257: dt=0.9900, 80 negative triangles 258: dt=0.9900, 91 negative triangles 259: dt=0.9900, 83 negative triangles 260: dt=0.9900, 81 negative triangles 261: dt=0.9900, 78 negative triangles 262: dt=0.9900, 71 negative triangles 263: dt=0.9900, 69 negative triangles 264: dt=0.9900, 77 negative triangles 265: dt=0.9900, 74 negative triangles 266: dt=0.9900, 72 negative triangles 267: dt=0.9900, 74 negative triangles 268: dt=0.9900, 75 negative triangles 269: dt=0.9900, 70 negative triangles 270: dt=0.9900, 75 negative triangles 271: dt=0.9900, 70 negative triangles 272: dt=0.9900, 66 negative triangles 273: dt=0.9900, 67 negative triangles 274: dt=0.9900, 67 negative triangles 275: dt=0.9900, 70 negative triangles 276: dt=0.9900, 63 negative triangles 277: dt=0.9900, 66 negative triangles 278: dt=0.9900, 65 negative triangles 279: dt=0.9900, 64 negative triangles 280: dt=0.9900, 67 negative triangles 281: dt=0.9900, 62 negative triangles 282: dt=0.9900, 62 negative triangles 283: dt=0.9900, 61 negative triangles 284: dt=0.9900, 57 negative triangles 285: dt=0.9900, 57 negative triangles 286: dt=0.9900, 55 negative triangles 287: dt=0.9900, 60 negative triangles 288: dt=0.9900, 57 negative triangles 289: dt=0.9900, 55 negative triangles 290: dt=0.9900, 55 negative triangles 291: dt=0.9900, 55 negative triangles 292: dt=0.9900, 58 negative triangles 293: dt=0.9900, 51 negative triangles 294: dt=0.9900, 45 negative triangles 295: dt=0.9900, 44 negative triangles 296: dt=0.9900, 54 negative triangles 297: dt=0.9900, 50 negative triangles 298: dt=0.9900, 50 negative triangles 299: dt=0.9900, 48 negative triangles 300: dt=0.9900, 49 negative triangles 301: dt=0.9900, 44 negative triangles 302: dt=0.9900, 48 negative triangles 303: dt=0.9900, 45 negative triangles 304: dt=0.9900, 50 negative triangles 305: dt=0.9900, 42 negative triangles 306: dt=0.9900, 43 negative triangles 307: dt=0.9900, 44 negative triangles 308: dt=0.9900, 41 negative triangles 309: dt=0.9900, 39 negative triangles 310: dt=0.9900, 42 negative triangles 311: dt=0.9900, 42 negative triangles 312: dt=0.9900, 38 negative triangles 313: dt=0.9900, 43 negative triangles 314: dt=0.9900, 38 negative triangles 315: dt=0.9900, 43 negative triangles 316: dt=0.9900, 45 negative triangles 317: dt=0.9900, 38 negative triangles 318: dt=0.9900, 40 negative triangles 319: dt=0.9900, 41 negative triangles 320: dt=0.9900, 36 negative triangles 321: dt=0.9900, 40 negative triangles 322: dt=0.9900, 38 negative triangles 323: dt=0.9900, 39 negative triangles 324: dt=0.9900, 37 negative triangles 325: dt=0.9900, 32 negative triangles 326: dt=0.9900, 37 negative triangles 327: dt=0.9900, 28 negative triangles 328: dt=0.9900, 30 negative triangles 329: dt=0.9900, 29 negative triangles 330: dt=0.9900, 30 negative triangles 331: dt=0.9900, 28 negative triangles 332: dt=0.9900, 29 negative triangles 333: dt=0.9900, 27 negative triangles 334: dt=0.9900, 27 negative triangles 335: dt=0.9900, 33 negative triangles 336: dt=0.9900, 26 negative triangles 337: dt=0.9900, 30 negative triangles 338: dt=0.9900, 26 negative triangles 339: dt=0.9900, 26 negative triangles 340: dt=0.9900, 28 negative triangles 341: dt=0.9900, 26 negative triangles 342: dt=0.9900, 28 negative triangles 343: dt=0.9900, 26 negative triangles 344: dt=0.9900, 25 negative triangles 345: dt=0.9900, 25 negative triangles 346: dt=0.9900, 25 negative triangles 347: dt=0.9900, 24 negative triangles 348: dt=0.9900, 23 negative triangles 349: dt=0.9900, 19 negative triangles 350: dt=0.9900, 18 negative triangles 351: dt=0.9900, 21 negative triangles 352: dt=0.9900, 19 negative triangles 353: dt=0.9900, 17 negative triangles 354: dt=0.9900, 16 negative triangles 355: dt=0.9900, 14 negative triangles 356: dt=0.9900, 14 negative triangles 357: dt=0.9900, 13 negative triangles 358: dt=0.9900, 14 negative triangles 359: dt=0.9900, 10 negative triangles 360: dt=0.9900, 11 negative triangles 361: dt=0.9900, 11 negative triangles 362: dt=0.9900, 13 negative triangles 363: dt=0.9900, 9 negative triangles 364: dt=0.9900, 9 negative triangles 365: dt=0.9900, 6 negative triangles 366: dt=0.9900, 11 negative triangles 367: dt=0.9900, 5 negative triangles 368: dt=0.9900, 5 negative triangles 369: dt=0.9900, 4 negative triangles 370: dt=0.9900, 3 negative triangles 371: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 372: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 373: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 374: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 375: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 376: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 377: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 378: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 379: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 380: dt=0.9900, 2 negative triangles 381: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 382: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 383: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 384: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 385: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 386: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 387: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 388: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 389: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 390: dt=0.9405, 2 negative triangles 391: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 392: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 393: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 394: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 395: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 396: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 397: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 398: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 399: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 400: dt=0.8935, 2 negative triangles 401: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 402: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 403: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 404: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 405: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 406: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 407: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 408: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 409: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 410: dt=0.8488, 2 negative triangles 411: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 412: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 413: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 414: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 415: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 416: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 417: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 418: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 419: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 420: dt=0.8064, 2 negative triangles 421: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 422: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 423: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 424: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 425: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 426: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 427: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 428: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 429: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 430: dt=0.7660, 2 negative triangles 431: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 432: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 433: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 434: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 435: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 436: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 437: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 438: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 439: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 440: dt=0.7277, 2 negative triangles 441: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 442: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 443: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 444: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 445: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 446: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 447: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 448: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 449: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 450: dt=0.6914, 2 negative triangles 451: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 452: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 453: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 454: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 455: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 456: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 457: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 458: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 459: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 460: dt=0.6568, 2 negative triangles 461: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 462: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 463: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 464: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 465: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 466: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 467: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 468: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 469: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 470: dt=0.6239, 2 negative triangles 471: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 472: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 473: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 474: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 475: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 476: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 477: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 478: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 479: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 480: dt=0.5927, 2 negative triangles 481: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 482: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 483: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 484: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 485: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 486: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 487: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 488: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 489: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 490: dt=0.5631, 2 negative triangles 491: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 492: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 493: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 494: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 495: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 496: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 497: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 498: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 499: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 500: dt=0.5350, 2 negative triangles 501: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 502: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 503: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 504: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 505: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 506: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 507: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 508: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 509: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 510: dt=0.5082, 2 negative triangles 511: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 512: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 513: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 514: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 515: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 516: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 517: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 518: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 519: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 520: dt=0.4828, 2 negative triangles 521: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 522: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 523: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 524: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 525: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 526: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 527: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 528: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 529: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 530: dt=0.4587, 2 negative triangles 531: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 532: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 533: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 534: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 535: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 536: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 537: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 538: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 539: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 540: dt=0.4357, 2 negative triangles 541: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 542: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 543: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 544: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 545: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 546: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 547: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 548: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 549: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 550: dt=0.4139, 2 negative triangles 551: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 552: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 553: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 554: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 555: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 556: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 557: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 558: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 559: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 560: dt=0.3932, 2 negative triangles 561: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 562: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 563: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 564: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 565: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 566: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 567: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 568: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 569: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 570: dt=0.3736, 2 negative triangles 571: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 572: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 573: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 574: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 575: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 576: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 577: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 578: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 579: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 580: dt=0.3549, 2 negative triangles 581: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 582: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 583: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 584: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 585: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 586: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 587: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 588: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 589: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 590: dt=0.3372, 2 negative triangles 591: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 592: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 593: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 594: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 595: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 596: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 597: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 598: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 599: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 600: dt=0.3203, 2 negative triangles 601: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 602: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 603: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 604: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 605: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 606: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 607: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 608: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 609: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 610: dt=0.3043, 2 negative triangles 611: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 612: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 613: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 614: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 615: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 616: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 617: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 618: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 619: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 620: dt=0.2891, 2 negative triangles 621: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 622: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 623: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 624: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 625: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 626: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 627: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 628: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 629: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 630: dt=0.2746, 2 negative triangles 631: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 632: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 633: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 634: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 635: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 636: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 637: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 638: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 639: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 640: dt=0.2609, 2 negative triangles 641: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 642: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 643: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 644: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 645: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 646: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 647: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 648: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 649: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 650: dt=0.2478, 2 negative triangles 651: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 652: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 653: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 654: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 655: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 656: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 657: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 658: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 659: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 660: dt=0.2354, 2 negative triangles 661: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 662: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 663: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 664: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 665: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 666: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 667: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 668: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 669: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 670: dt=0.2237, 2 negative triangles 671: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 672: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 673: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 674: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 675: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 676: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 677: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 678: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 679: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 680: dt=0.2125, 2 negative triangles 681: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 682: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 683: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 684: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 685: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 686: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 687: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 688: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 689: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 690: dt=0.2019, 2 negative triangles 691: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 692: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 693: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 694: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 695: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 696: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 697: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 698: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 699: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 700: dt=0.1918, 2 negative triangles 701: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 702: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 703: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 704: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 705: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 706: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 707: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 708: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 709: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 710: dt=0.1822, 2 negative triangles 711: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 712: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 713: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 714: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 715: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 716: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 717: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 718: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 719: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 720: dt=0.1731, 2 negative triangles 721: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 722: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 723: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 724: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 725: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 726: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 727: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 728: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 729: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 730: dt=0.1644, 2 negative triangles 731: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 732: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 733: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 734: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 735: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 736: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 737: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 738: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 739: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 740: dt=0.1562, 2 negative triangles 741: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 742: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 743: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 744: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 745: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 746: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 747: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 748: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 749: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 750: dt=0.1484, 2 negative triangles 751: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 752: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 753: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 754: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 755: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 756: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 757: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 758: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 759: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 760: dt=0.1410, 2 negative triangles 761: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 762: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 763: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 764: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 765: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 766: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 767: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 768: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 769: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 770: dt=0.1339, 2 negative triangles 771: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 772: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 773: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 774: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 775: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 776: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 777: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 778: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 779: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 780: dt=0.1272, 2 negative triangles 781: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 782: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 783: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 784: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 785: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 786: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 787: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 788: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 789: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 790: dt=0.1209, 2 negative triangles 791: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 792: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 793: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 794: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 795: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 796: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 797: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 798: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 799: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 800: dt=0.1148, 2 negative triangles 801: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 802: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 803: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 804: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 805: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 806: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 807: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 808: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 809: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 810: dt=0.1091, 2 negative triangles 811: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 812: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 813: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 814: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 815: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 816: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 817: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 818: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 819: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 820: dt=0.1036, 2 negative triangles 821: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 822: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 823: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 824: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 825: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 826: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 827: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 828: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 829: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 830: dt=0.0984, 2 negative triangles 831: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 832: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 833: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 834: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 835: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 836: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 837: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 838: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 839: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 840: dt=0.0935, 2 negative triangles 841: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 842: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 843: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 844: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 845: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 846: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 847: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 848: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 849: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 850: dt=0.0888, 2 negative triangles 851: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 852: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 853: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 854: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 855: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 856: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 857: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 858: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 859: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 860: dt=0.0844, 2 negative triangles 861: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 862: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 863: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 864: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 865: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 866: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 867: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 868: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 869: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 870: dt=0.0802, 2 negative triangles 871: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 872: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 873: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 874: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 875: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 876: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 877: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 878: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 879: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 880: dt=0.0762, 2 negative triangles 881: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 882: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 883: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 884: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 885: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 886: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 887: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 888: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 889: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 890: dt=0.0724, 2 negative triangles 891: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 892: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 893: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 894: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 895: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 896: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 897: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 898: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 899: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 900: dt=0.0687, 2 negative triangles 901: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 902: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 903: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 904: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 905: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 906: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 907: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 908: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 909: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 910: dt=0.0653, 2 negative triangles 911: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 912: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 913: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 914: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 915: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 916: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 917: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 918: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 919: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 920: dt=0.0620, 2 negative triangles 921: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 922: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 923: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 924: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 925: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 926: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 927: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 928: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 929: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 930: dt=0.0589, 2 negative triangles 931: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 932: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 933: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 934: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 935: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 936: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 937: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 938: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 939: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 940: dt=0.0560, 2 negative triangles 941: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 942: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 943: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 944: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 945: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 946: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 947: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 948: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 949: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 950: dt=0.0532, 2 negative triangles 951: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 952: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 953: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 954: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 955: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 956: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 957: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 958: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 959: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 960: dt=0.0505, 2 negative triangles 961: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 962: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 963: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 964: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 965: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 966: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 967: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 968: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 969: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 970: dt=0.0480, 2 negative triangles 971: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 972: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 973: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 974: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 975: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 976: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 977: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 978: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 979: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 980: dt=0.0456, 2 negative triangles 981: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 982: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 983: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 984: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 985: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 986: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 987: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 988: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 989: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 990: dt=0.0433, 2 negative triangles 991: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 992: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 993: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 994: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 995: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 996: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 997: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 998: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 999: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1000: dt=0.0412, 2 negative triangles 1001: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1002: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1003: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1004: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1005: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1006: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1007: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1008: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1009: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1010: dt=0.0391, 2 negative triangles 1011: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1012: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1013: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1014: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1015: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1016: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1017: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1018: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1019: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1020: dt=0.0371, 2 negative triangles 1021: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1022: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1023: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1024: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1025: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1026: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1027: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1028: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1029: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1030: dt=0.0353, 2 negative triangles 1031: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1032: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1033: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1034: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1035: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1036: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1037: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1038: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1039: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1040: dt=0.0335, 2 negative triangles 1041: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1042: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1043: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1044: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1045: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1046: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1047: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1048: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1049: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1050: dt=0.0319, 2 negative triangles 1051: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1052: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1053: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1054: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1055: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1056: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1057: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1058: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1059: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1060: dt=0.0303, 2 negative triangles 1061: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1062: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1063: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1064: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1065: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1066: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1067: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1068: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1069: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1070: dt=0.0287, 2 negative triangles 1071: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1072: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1073: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1074: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1075: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1076: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1077: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1078: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1079: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1080: dt=0.0273, 2 negative triangles 1081: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1082: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1083: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1084: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1085: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1086: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1087: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1088: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1089: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1090: dt=0.0259, 2 negative triangles 1091: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1092: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1093: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1094: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1095: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1096: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1097: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1098: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1099: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1100: dt=0.0246, 2 negative triangles 1101: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1102: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1103: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1104: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1105: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1106: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1107: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1108: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1109: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1110: dt=0.0234, 2 negative triangles 1111: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1112: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1113: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1114: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1115: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1116: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1117: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1118: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1119: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1120: dt=0.0222, 2 negative triangles 1121: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1122: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1123: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1124: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1125: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1126: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1127: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1128: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1129: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1130: dt=0.0211, 2 negative triangles 1131: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1132: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1133: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1134: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1135: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1136: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1137: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1138: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1139: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1140: dt=0.0201, 2 negative triangles 1141: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1142: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1143: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1144: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1145: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1146: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1147: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1148: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1149: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1150: dt=0.0191, 2 negative triangles 1151: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1152: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1153: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1154: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1155: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1156: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1157: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1158: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1159: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles 1160: dt=0.0181, 2 negative triangles writing registered surface to ../surf/rh.sphere.reg... 1161: dt=0.0172, 2 negative triangles 1162: 2 negative triangles registration took 6.38 hours mris_register utimesec 70000.472310 mris_register stimesec 33.655883 mris_register ru_maxrss 564700 mris_register ru_ixrss 0 mris_register ru_idrss 0 mris_register ru_isrss 0 mris_register ru_minflt 80480 mris_register ru_majflt 0 mris_register ru_nswap 0 mris_register ru_inblock 5584 mris_register ru_oublock 23272 mris_register ru_msgsnd 0 mris_register ru_msgrcv 0 mris_register ru_nsignals 0 mris_register ru_nvcsw 1196688 mris_register ru_nivcsw 541403 FSRUNTIME@ mris_register 6.3773 hours 1 threads #-------------------------------------------- #@# Jacobian white lh Sat Jul 15 11:43:06 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_jacobian ../surf/lh.white.preaparc ../surf/lh.sphere.reg ../surf/lh.jacobian_white reading surface from ../surf/lh.white.preaparc... writing curvature file ../surf/lh.jacobian_white #-------------------------------------------- #@# Jacobian white rh Sat Jul 15 11:43:14 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_jacobian ../surf/rh.white.preaparc ../surf/rh.sphere.reg ../surf/rh.jacobian_white reading surface from ../surf/rh.white.preaparc... writing curvature file ../surf/rh.jacobian_white #-------------------------------------------- #@# AvgCurv lh Sat Jul 15 11:43:21 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mrisp_paint -a 5 /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif#6 ../surf/lh.sphere.reg ../surf/lh.avg_curv averaging curvature patterns 5 times... reading surface from ../surf/lh.sphere.reg... reading template parameterization from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif... writing curvature file to ../surf/lh.avg_curv... #-------------------------------------------- #@# AvgCurv rh Sat Jul 15 11:43:29 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mrisp_paint -a 5 /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif#6 ../surf/rh.sphere.reg ../surf/rh.avg_curv averaging curvature patterns 5 times... reading surface from ../surf/rh.sphere.reg... reading template parameterization from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.folding.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.tif... writing curvature file to ../surf/rh.avg_curv... #----------------------------------------- #@# Cortical Parc lh Sat Jul 15 11:43:34 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_ca_label -l ../label/lh.cortex.label -aseg ../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz -seed 1234 nmr01106 lh ../surf/lh.sphere.reg /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.DKaparc.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.gcs ../label/lh.aparc.annot setting seed for random number generator to 1234 using ../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz aseg volume to correct midline $Id: mris_ca_label.c,v 1.37 2014/02/04 17:46:42 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading atlas from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/lh.DKaparc.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.gcs... reading color table from GCSA file.... average std = 0.8 using min determinant for regularization = 0.006 0 singular and 342 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized input 0: MEAN CURVATURE, flags 0, avgs 5, name mean_curvature labeling surface... 4854 labels changed using aseg relabeling using gibbs priors... 000: 7728 changed, 398436 examined... 001: 1967 changed, 31660 examined... 002: 568 changed, 10604 examined... 003: 251 changed, 3294 examined... 004: 144 changed, 1422 examined... 005: 79 changed, 760 examined... 006: 29 changed, 395 examined... 007: 18 changed, 162 examined... 008: 10 changed, 90 examined... 009: 6 changed, 63 examined... 010: 7 changed, 40 examined... 011: 2 changed, 37 examined... 012: 1 changed, 13 examined... 013: 1 changed, 7 examined... 014: 1 changed, 8 examined... 015: 1 changed, 6 examined... 016: 0 changed, 7 examined... 872 labels changed using aseg 000: 363 total segments, 323 labels (7287 vertices) changed 001: 65 total segments, 25 labels (2499 vertices) changed 002: 42 total segments, 2 labels (5 vertices) changed 003: 40 total segments, 0 labels (0 vertices) changed 10 filter iterations complete (10 requested, 23 changed) rationalizing unknown annotations with cortex label relabeling unknown label... relabeling corpuscallosum label... 4522 vertices marked for relabeling... 4522 labels changed in reclassification. writing output to ../label/lh.aparc.annot... classification took 1 minutes and 11 seconds. #----------------------------------------- #@# Cortical Parc rh Sat Jul 15 11:44:45 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_ca_label -l ../label/rh.cortex.label -aseg ../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz -seed 1234 nmr01106 rh ../surf/rh.sphere.reg /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.DKaparc.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.gcs ../label/rh.aparc.annot setting seed for random number generator to 1234 using ../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz aseg volume to correct midline $Id: mris_ca_label.c,v 1.37 2014/02/04 17:46:42 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading atlas from /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/average/rh.DKaparc.atlas.acfb40.noaparc.i12.2016-08-02.gcs... reading color table from GCSA file.... average std = 0.7 using min determinant for regularization = 0.004 0 singular and 309 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized input 0: MEAN CURVATURE, flags 0, avgs 5, name mean_curvature labeling surface... 1816 labels changed using aseg relabeling using gibbs priors... 000: 5511 changed, 330866 examined... 001: 1402 changed, 22868 examined... 002: 426 changed, 7570 examined... 003: 143 changed, 2481 examined... 004: 51 changed, 818 examined... 005: 20 changed, 309 examined... 006: 8 changed, 115 examined... 007: 2 changed, 40 examined... 008: 2 changed, 13 examined... 009: 3 changed, 13 examined... 010: 0 changed, 11 examined... 282 labels changed using aseg 000: 166 total segments, 124 labels (957 vertices) changed 001: 48 total segments, 6 labels (10 vertices) changed 002: 42 total segments, 0 labels (0 vertices) changed 10 filter iterations complete (10 requested, 19 changed) rationalizing unknown annotations with cortex label relabeling unknown label... relabeling corpuscallosum label... 3942 vertices marked for relabeling... 3942 labels changed in reclassification. writing output to ../label/rh.aparc.annot... classification took 0 minutes and 50 seconds. #-------------------------------------------- #@# Make Pial Surf lh Sat Jul 15 11:45:36 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_make_surfaces -orig_white white.preaparc -orig_pial white.preaparc -aseg ../mri/aseg.presurf -mgz -T1 brain.finalsurfs -max_gray_at_csf_border 60 -max_csf 35 nmr01106 lh using white.preaparc starting white location... using white.preaparc starting pial locations... using aseg volume ../mri/aseg.presurf to prevent surfaces crossing the midline INFO: assuming MGZ format for volumes. using brain.finalsurfs as T1 volume... $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.172 2017/02/16 19:42:36 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/filled.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brain.finalsurfs.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/wm.mgz... 62122 bright wm thresholded. 6589 bright non-wm voxels segmented. reading original surface position from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.orig... computing class statistics... border white: 757455 voxels (1.89%) border gray 784249 voxels (1.96%) WM (99.0): 100.1 +- 6.2 [70.0 --> 110.0] GM (83.0) : 79.9 +- 12.4 [30.0 --> 110.0] setting MIN_GRAY_AT_WHITE_BORDER to 72.6 (was 70) setting MAX_BORDER_WHITE to 114.2 (was 105) setting MIN_BORDER_WHITE to 85.0 (was 85) setting MAX_CSF to 35.0 (was 40) setting MAX_GRAY to 101.8 (was 95) setting MAX_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 60.0 (was 75) setting MIN_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 47.9 (was 40) spring scale = 1.34 using class modes intead of means, discounting robust sigmas.... intensity peaks found at WM=108+-12.2, GM=85+-9.6 mean inside = 98.0, mean outside = 82.5 smoothing surface for 5 iterations... reading initial white vertex positions from white.preaparc... reading colortable from annotation file... colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/tanha_002/users/greve/fsdev.build/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) repositioning cortical surface to gray/white boundary smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000 vertex spacing 0.64 +- 0.22 (0.00-->3.85) (max @ vno 272372 --> 272373) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->2.79) mean absolute distance = 1.18 +- 1.37 11079 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 1 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 3 with 61 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 551 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 5 with 272 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 6 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 2 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 8 with 380 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 10 with 46 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 11 with 62 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 12 with 6 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 13 with 21 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 2 vertex label from ripped group mean border=97.8, 6809 (6741) missing vertices, mean dist -0.3 [1.9 (%39.5)->0.6 (%60.5))] %39 local maxima, %45 large gradients and %10 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=2.0, host=compu, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 0.000000 desired_rms_height 0.000000 momentum 0.000000 nbhd_size 0 max_nbrs 0 niterations 100 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 0 (0) use curv 0 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 2 mris->hemisphere 0 randomSeed 0 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000 vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.21 (0.01-->3.61) (max @ vno 391121 --> 391122) face area 0.17 +- 0.09 (0.00-->3.25) mean absolute distance = 0.58 +- 0.87 10207 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2893417.2, rms=4.101 001: dt: 0.5000, sse=2473955.0, rms=3.098 (24.459%) rms = 2.91, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 002: dt: 0.5000, sse=2484882.8, rms=2.913 (5.971%) 003: dt: 0.2500, sse=2138366.5, rms=2.596 (10.872%) 004: dt: 0.2500, sse=2072065.0, rms=2.489 (4.145%) rms = 2.45, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 005: dt: 0.2500, sse=1936477.8, rms=2.446 (1.730%) rms = 2.44, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 006: dt: 0.1250, sse=1897766.6, rms=2.445 (0.040%) positioning took 2.6 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 2 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 2 with 38 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 555 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 6 with 266 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 2 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 11 with 310 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 13 with 5 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 14 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 15 with 57 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 16 with 8 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 17 with 47 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 18 with 15 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 19 with 10 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=97.7, 5831 (3215) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.8 (%52.6)->0.4 (%47.4))] %69 local maxima, %22 large gradients and % 3 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=1.0, host=compu, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500 vertex spacing 0.64 +- 0.21 (0.01-->3.78) (max @ vno 391120 --> 391123) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->3.02) mean absolute distance = 0.40 +- 0.64 10171 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2441077.2, rms=3.611 rms = 2.85, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 007: dt: 0.5000, sse=2485782.2, rms=2.851 (21.056%) 008: dt: 0.2500, sse=2110214.0, rms=2.496 (12.436%) rms = 2.33, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 009: dt: 0.2500, sse=2259420.0, rms=2.331 (6.598%) rms = 2.32, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 010: dt: 0.1250, sse=1927041.4, rms=2.325 (0.280%) positioning took 1.7 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 2 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 0 with 2 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 2 with 43 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 6 with 511 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 7 with 272 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 10 with 324 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 13 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 14 with 55 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 15 with 11 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 16 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 17 with 32 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 18 with 13 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 19 with 22 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=98.2, 5754 (2325) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.5 (%61.4)->0.3 (%38.6))] %77 local maxima, %15 large gradients and % 3 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=1, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 vertex spacing 0.64 +- 0.22 (0.01-->3.98) (max @ vno 391120 --> 391123) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->2.99) mean absolute distance = 0.31 +- 0.49 11055 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2071835.0, rms=2.746 rms = 2.49, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 011: dt: 0.5000, sse=2321902.2, rms=2.493 (9.202%) 012: dt: 0.2500, sse=2110114.5, rms=2.334 (6.402%) 013: dt: 0.2500, sse=2079182.9, rms=2.223 (4.760%) rms = 2.24, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 014: dt: 0.1250, sse=1697930.4, rms=2.160 (2.824%) rms = 2.15, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 015: dt: 0.1250, sse=1833584.4, rms=2.149 (0.506%) positioning took 2.4 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... deleting segment 1 with 40 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 3 with 10 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 470 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 5 with 268 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 6 with 311 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 8 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 9 with 41 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 10 with 8 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 11 with 5 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 12 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 13 with 29 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 14 with 14 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 15 with 22 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=98.2, 6167 (1965) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.4 (%56.1)->0.3 (%43.9))] %80 local maxima, %12 large gradients and % 2 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.2, host=compu, nav=0, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 writing white matter surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.white... writing smoothed curvature to lh.curv 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1890800.6, rms=2.325 rms = 2.30, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 016: dt: 0.5000, sse=2117057.2, rms=2.300 (1.059%) 017: dt: 0.2500, sse=2055206.0, rms=2.178 (5.300%) 018: dt: 0.2500, sse=1864377.1, rms=2.123 (2.540%) rms = 2.11, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 019: dt: 0.2500, sse=1914147.5, rms=2.107 (0.745%) 020: dt: 0.1250, sse=1719972.0, rms=1.957 (7.099%) 021: dt: 0.1250, sse=1705047.9, rms=1.902 (2.848%) rms = 1.88, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 022: dt: 0.1250, sse=1634505.0, rms=1.879 (1.219%) positioning took 2.9 minutes removing intersecting faces 000: 17 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 17 intersecting terminating search with 17 intersecting generating cortex label... 45 non-cortical segments detected only using segment with 24896 vertices erasing segment 0 (vno[0] = 89667) erasing segment 1 (vno[0] = 104581) erasing segment 2 (vno[0] = 108768) erasing segment 4 (vno[0] = 128704) erasing segment 5 (vno[0] = 130631) erasing segment 6 (vno[0] = 136720) erasing segment 7 (vno[0] = 160015) erasing segment 8 (vno[0] = 160100) erasing segment 9 (vno[0] = 162016) erasing segment 10 (vno[0] = 181373) erasing segment 11 (vno[0] = 185282) erasing segment 12 (vno[0] = 198646) erasing segment 13 (vno[0] = 214756) erasing segment 14 (vno[0] = 217188) erasing segment 15 (vno[0] = 231660) erasing segment 16 (vno[0] = 233134) erasing segment 17 (vno[0] = 252982) erasing segment 18 (vno[0] = 254495) erasing segment 19 (vno[0] = 254539) erasing segment 20 (vno[0] = 257061) erasing segment 21 (vno[0] = 257079) erasing segment 22 (vno[0] = 258980) erasing segment 23 (vno[0] = 259047) erasing segment 24 (vno[0] = 269175) erasing segment 25 (vno[0] = 269243) erasing segment 26 (vno[0] = 270939) erasing segment 27 (vno[0] = 273079) erasing segment 28 (vno[0] = 274635) erasing segment 29 (vno[0] = 274656) erasing segment 30 (vno[0] = 274685) erasing segment 31 (vno[0] = 285464) erasing segment 32 (vno[0] = 285514) erasing segment 33 (vno[0] = 294046) erasing segment 34 (vno[0] = 316137) erasing segment 35 (vno[0] = 329660) erasing segment 36 (vno[0] = 331056) erasing segment 37 (vno[0] = 332523) erasing segment 38 (vno[0] = 334036) erasing segment 39 (vno[0] = 335611) erasing segment 40 (vno[0] = 340699) erasing segment 41 (vno[0] = 392775) erasing segment 42 (vno[0] = 393685) erasing segment 43 (vno[0] = 393974) erasing segment 44 (vno[0] = 395590) writing cortex label to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/label/lh.cortex.label... writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.curv writing smoothed area to lh.area writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.area vertex spacing 0.64 +- 0.22 (0.00-->4.00) (max @ vno 391120 --> 391123) face area 0.17 +- 0.10 (0.00-->2.75) repositioning cortical surface to gray/csf boundary. smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000 averaging target values for 5 iterations... inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 0 with 3 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 3 with 265 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 5 with 9 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group removing 1 vertex label from ripped group removing 2 vertex label from ripped group smoothing surface for 5 iterations... reading initial pial vertex positions from white.preaparc... mean border=69.1, 6096 (6096) missing vertices, mean dist 0.5 [0.5 (%0.0)->1.7 (%100.0))] % 7 local maxima, %18 large gradients and %69 min vals, 1386 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=2.0, host=compu, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000 averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=70884184.0, rms=30.510 001: dt: 0.5000, sse=54822900.0, rms=26.780 (12.227%) 002: dt: 0.5000, sse=42494740.0, rms=23.517 (12.185%) 003: dt: 0.5000, sse=33597164.0, rms=20.845 (11.363%) 004: dt: 0.5000, sse=27067394.0, rms=18.639 (10.581%) 005: dt: 0.5000, sse=21722290.0, rms=16.615 (10.861%) 006: dt: 0.5000, sse=16909952.0, rms=14.551 (12.421%) 007: dt: 0.5000, sse=12682010.0, rms=12.458 (14.381%) 008: dt: 0.5000, sse=9321722.0, rms=10.502 (15.703%) 009: dt: 0.5000, sse=7029632.5, rms=8.925 (15.017%) 010: dt: 0.5000, sse=5632496.5, rms=7.809 (12.508%) 011: dt: 0.5000, sse=4929602.0, rms=7.181 (8.041%) 012: dt: 0.5000, sse=4558645.0, rms=6.825 (4.960%) 013: dt: 0.5000, sse=4393169.5, rms=6.658 (2.447%) 014: dt: 0.5000, sse=4295807.0, rms=6.556 (1.523%) rms = 6.51, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 015: dt: 0.5000, sse=4254367.5, rms=6.511 (0.683%) 016: dt: 0.2500, sse=3716731.5, rms=5.896 (9.457%) 017: dt: 0.2500, sse=3643710.0, rms=5.809 (1.466%) rms = 5.80, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 018: dt: 0.2500, sse=3636273.0, rms=5.798 (0.202%) 019: dt: 0.1250, sse=3384979.5, rms=5.485 (5.383%) 020: dt: 0.1250, sse=3335300.8, rms=5.423 (1.143%) rms = 5.41, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 021: dt: 0.1250, sse=3325114.0, rms=5.409 (0.257%) positioning took 12.9 minutes mean border=64.1, 19670 (2071) missing vertices, mean dist 0.2 [0.2 (%7.3)->0.7 (%92.7))] % 8 local maxima, %16 large gradients and %66 min vals, 3762 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=1.0, host=compu, nav=8, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500 averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=9226179.0, rms=10.234 022: dt: 0.5000, sse=6262839.5, rms=8.106 (20.792%) 023: dt: 0.5000, sse=5141488.0, rms=7.155 (11.739%) 024: dt: 0.5000, sse=4789205.5, rms=6.819 (4.687%) 025: dt: 0.5000, sse=4488625.0, rms=6.529 (4.262%) rms = 6.48, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 026: dt: 0.5000, sse=4446486.0, rms=6.480 (0.756%) 027: dt: 0.2500, sse=3796919.5, rms=5.749 (11.275%) 028: dt: 0.2500, sse=3723174.0, rms=5.663 (1.490%) rms = 5.74, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 029: dt: 0.1250, sse=3610048.8, rms=5.524 (2.457%) 030: dt: 0.1250, sse=3499947.2, rms=5.381 (2.585%) 031: dt: 0.1250, sse=3453939.5, rms=5.323 (1.088%) rms = 5.31, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 032: dt: 0.1250, sse=3440326.8, rms=5.305 (0.333%) positioning took 11.6 minutes mean border=63.8, 27811 (1506) missing vertices, mean dist 0.1 [0.1 (%30.9)->0.3 (%69.1))] % 9 local maxima, %14 large gradients and %65 min vals, 2923 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=3574992.0, rms=5.413 rms = 5.95, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 033: dt: 0.2500, sse=3471100.5, rms=5.281 (2.426%) rms = 5.31, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... rms = 5.25, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 034: dt: 0.1250, sse=3448078.5, rms=5.251 (0.571%) positioning took 3.0 minutes mean border=63.3, 44961 (1435) missing vertices, mean dist 0.0 [0.1 (%33.2)->0.2 (%66.8))] %10 local maxima, %13 large gradients and %62 min vals, 2778 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.2, host=compu, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 writing pial surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.pial... writing smoothed curvature to lh.curv.pial 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=3445920.0, rms=5.252 rms = 5.52, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 035: dt: 0.2500, sse=3368290.8, rms=5.155 (1.853%) rms = 5.14, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 036: dt: 0.2500, sse=3344206.2, rms=5.139 (0.306%) 037: dt: 0.1250, sse=3254095.0, rms=5.016 (2.401%) 038: dt: 0.1250, sse=3195511.2, rms=4.940 (1.506%) rms = 4.93, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 039: dt: 0.1250, sse=3187492.0, rms=4.932 (0.161%) positioning took 5.6 minutes removing intersecting faces 000: 57 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 57 intersecting terminating search with 57 intersecting writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.curv.pial writing smoothed area to lh.area.pial writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.area.pial vertex spacing 0.71 +- 0.35 (0.01-->5.51) (max @ vno 160475 --> 162586) face area 0.20 +- 0.17 (0.00-->4.70) measuring cortical thickness... writing cortical thickness estimate to 'thickness' file. 0 of 398436 vertices processed 25000 of 398436 vertices processed 50000 of 398436 vertices processed 75000 of 398436 vertices processed 100000 of 398436 vertices processed 125000 of 398436 vertices processed 150000 of 398436 vertices processed 175000 of 398436 vertices processed 200000 of 398436 vertices processed 225000 of 398436 vertices processed 250000 of 398436 vertices processed 275000 of 398436 vertices processed 300000 of 398436 vertices processed 325000 of 398436 vertices processed 350000 of 398436 vertices processed 375000 of 398436 vertices processed 0 of 398436 vertices processed 25000 of 398436 vertices processed 50000 of 398436 vertices processed 75000 of 398436 vertices processed 100000 of 398436 vertices processed 125000 of 398436 vertices processed 150000 of 398436 vertices processed 175000 of 398436 vertices processed 200000 of 398436 vertices processed 225000 of 398436 vertices processed 250000 of 398436 vertices processed 275000 of 398436 vertices processed 300000 of 398436 vertices processed 325000 of 398436 vertices processed 350000 of 398436 vertices processed 375000 of 398436 vertices processed thickness calculation complete, 31:723 truncations. 77132 vertices at 0 distance 213847 vertices at 1 distance 207538 vertices at 2 distance 125892 vertices at 3 distance 66163 vertices at 4 distance 32785 vertices at 5 distance 15753 vertices at 6 distance 7939 vertices at 7 distance 4378 vertices at 8 distance 2722 vertices at 9 distance 1745 vertices at 10 distance 1323 vertices at 11 distance 1071 vertices at 12 distance 869 vertices at 13 distance 684 vertices at 14 distance 588 vertices at 15 distance 482 vertices at 16 distance 421 vertices at 17 distance 376 vertices at 18 distance 402 vertices at 19 distance 652 vertices at 20 distance writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.thickness positioning took 53.5 minutes #-------------------------------------------- #@# Make Pial Surf rh Sat Jul 15 12:39:05 EDT 2017 /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mris_make_surfaces -orig_white white.preaparc -orig_pial white.preaparc -aseg ../mri/aseg.presurf -mgz -T1 brain.finalsurfs -max_gray_at_csf_border 60 -max_csf 35 nmr01106 rh using white.preaparc starting white location... using white.preaparc starting pial locations... using aseg volume ../mri/aseg.presurf to prevent surfaces crossing the midline INFO: assuming MGZ format for volumes. using brain.finalsurfs as T1 volume... $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.172 2017/02/16 19:42:36 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/filled.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brain.finalsurfs.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.presurf.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/wm.mgz... 62122 bright wm thresholded. 6589 bright non-wm voxels segmented. reading original surface position from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.orig... computing class statistics... border white: 757455 voxels (1.89%) border gray 784249 voxels (1.96%) WM (99.0): 100.1 +- 6.2 [70.0 --> 110.0] GM (83.0) : 79.9 +- 12.4 [30.0 --> 110.0] setting MIN_GRAY_AT_WHITE_BORDER to 67.6 (was 70) setting MAX_BORDER_WHITE to 114.2 (was 105) setting MIN_BORDER_WHITE to 80.0 (was 85) setting MAX_CSF to 35.0 (was 40) setting MAX_GRAY to 101.8 (was 95) setting MAX_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 60.0 (was 75) setting MIN_GRAY_AT_CSF_BORDER to 42.9 (was 40) spring scale = 1.34 using class modes intead of means, discounting robust sigmas.... intensity peaks found at WM=108+-6.1, GM=80+-8.7 mean inside = 98.8, mean outside = 82.8 smoothing surface for 5 iterations... reading initial white vertex positions from white.preaparc... reading colortable from annotation file... colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/tanha_002/users/greve/fsdev.build/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) repositioning cortical surface to gray/white boundary smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000 vertex spacing 0.66 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.83) (max @ vno 217890 --> 235926) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->9.13) mean absolute distance = 1.16 +- 1.31 9689 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... deleting segment 1 with 38 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 3 with 60 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 412 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 5 with 249 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 6 with 21 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 7 with 71 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 8 with 45 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 9 with 20 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 10 with 4 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 11 with 222 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 12 with 6 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=96.4, 912 (878) missing vertices, mean dist -0.3 [1.9 (%38.1)->0.6 (%61.9))] %49 local maxima, %38 large gradients and % 9 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=2.0, host=compu, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 complete_dist_mat 0 rms 0 smooth_averages 0 remove_neg 0 ico_order 0 which_surface 0 target_radius 0.000000 nfields 0 scale 0.000000 desired_rms_height 0.000000 momentum 0.000000 nbhd_size 0 max_nbrs 0 niterations 100 nsurfaces 0 SURFACES 3 flags 0 (0) use curv 0 no sulc 0 no rigid align 0 mris->nsize 2 mris->hemisphere 1 randomSeed 0 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000 vertex spacing 0.66 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.29) (max @ vno 66513 --> 70427) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->10.28) mean absolute distance = 0.60 +- 0.84 9533 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2220740.8, rms=4.400 001: dt: 0.5000, sse=1558093.5, rms=2.856 (35.078%) 002: dt: 0.5000, sse=1466648.2, rms=2.564 (10.236%) rms = 2.54, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 003: dt: 0.5000, sse=1470943.9, rms=2.542 (0.864%) 004: dt: 0.2500, sse=1247675.9, rms=1.696 (33.268%) 005: dt: 0.2500, sse=1167333.8, rms=1.524 (10.151%) 006: dt: 0.2500, sse=1141733.2, rms=1.459 (4.255%) rms = 1.42, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 007: dt: 0.2500, sse=1122834.2, rms=1.420 (2.662%) rms = 1.39, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 008: dt: 0.1250, sse=1088527.2, rms=1.387 (2.337%) positioning took 2.6 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... removing 2 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 0 with 2 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 1 with 41 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 2 with 59 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 3 with 368 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 241 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 6 with 16 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 7 with 65 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 8 with 3 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 9 with 34 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 10 with 22 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 11 with 20 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 12 with 230 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=96.2, 914 (310) missing vertices, mean dist -0.2 [0.8 (%50.9)->0.4 (%49.1))] %78 local maxima, %15 large gradients and % 2 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=1.0, host=compu, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500 vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.41) (max @ vno 66513 --> 70427) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->10.58) mean absolute distance = 0.40 +- 0.62 10814 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1767198.6, rms=3.524 009: dt: 0.5000, sse=1497858.1, rms=2.504 (28.945%) rms = 2.44, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 010: dt: 0.5000, sse=1513958.6, rms=2.435 (2.742%) 011: dt: 0.2500, sse=1247691.9, rms=1.559 (35.968%) 012: dt: 0.2500, sse=1185990.8, rms=1.371 (12.057%) 013: dt: 0.2500, sse=1169637.9, rms=1.312 (4.331%) rms = 1.27, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 014: dt: 0.2500, sse=1167087.0, rms=1.272 (3.025%) rms = 1.23, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 015: dt: 0.1250, sse=1130894.8, rms=1.225 (3.704%) positioning took 2.2 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... deleting segment 0 with 43 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 11 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 5 with 351 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 6 with 220 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 7 with 11 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 8 with 18 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 9 with 44 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 10 with 5 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 2 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 11 with 2 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 12 with 52 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 13 with 6 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 14 with 20 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 15 with 222 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=96.6, 1023 (212) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.4 (%59.7)->0.3 (%40.3))] %86 local maxima, % 9 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=1, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.22 (0.00-->6.46) (max @ vno 66513 --> 70427) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->10.23) mean absolute distance = 0.32 +- 0.50 11222 vertices more than 2 sigmas from mean. averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1329127.5, rms=2.225 rms = 1.89, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 016: dt: 0.5000, sse=1331418.9, rms=1.887 (15.189%) 017: dt: 0.2500, sse=1227454.2, rms=1.377 (27.059%) 018: dt: 0.2500, sse=1145665.5, rms=1.248 (9.341%) rms = 1.22, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 019: dt: 0.2500, sse=1119085.4, rms=1.222 (2.055%) 020: dt: 0.1250, sse=1092691.5, rms=1.147 (6.184%) rms = 1.12, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 021: dt: 0.1250, sse=1069099.4, rms=1.122 (2.172%) positioning took 1.9 minutes inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... deleting segment 0 with 44 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 2 with 10 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 3 with 347 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 4 with 220 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 5 with 11 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 7 with 3 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 4 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 10 with 18 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 11 with 42 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 12 with 5 points - only 0.00% unknown removing 3 vertex label from ripped group deleting segment 13 with 3 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 14 with 42 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 15 with 20 points - only 0.00% unknown deleting segment 16 with 219 points - only 0.00% unknown mean border=96.6, 1223 (178) missing vertices, mean dist -0.1 [0.3 (%55.1)->0.3 (%44.9))] %88 local maxima, % 7 large gradients and % 1 min vals, 0 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.2, host=compu, nav=0, nbrs=2, l_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 writing white matter surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.white... writing smoothed curvature to rh.curv 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=1154920.4, rms=1.610 rms = 1.45, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 022: dt: 0.5000, sse=1169090.1, rms=1.446 (10.174%) rms = 1.18, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 023: dt: 0.2500, sse=1176990.5, rms=1.177 (18.610%) 024: dt: 0.1250, sse=1057198.0, rms=1.013 (13.942%) 025: dt: 0.1250, sse=1023560.0, rms=0.962 (5.057%) rms = 0.95, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 026: dt: 0.1250, sse=1034314.9, rms=0.952 (1.044%) positioning took 1.6 minutes generating cortex label... 29 non-cortical segments detected only using segment with 13482 vertices erasing segment 0 (vno[0] = 112696) erasing segment 1 (vno[0] = 116351) erasing segment 3 (vno[0] = 130526) erasing segment 4 (vno[0] = 137819) erasing segment 5 (vno[0] = 141956) erasing segment 6 (vno[0] = 145144) erasing segment 7 (vno[0] = 149610) erasing segment 8 (vno[0] = 151317) erasing segment 9 (vno[0] = 175707) erasing segment 10 (vno[0] = 193780) erasing segment 11 (vno[0] = 198872) erasing segment 12 (vno[0] = 207243) erasing segment 13 (vno[0] = 229622) erasing segment 14 (vno[0] = 230898) erasing segment 15 (vno[0] = 233707) erasing segment 16 (vno[0] = 237835) erasing segment 17 (vno[0] = 239297) erasing segment 18 (vno[0] = 242087) erasing segment 19 (vno[0] = 243638) erasing segment 20 (vno[0] = 247993) erasing segment 21 (vno[0] = 250405) erasing segment 22 (vno[0] = 250430) erasing segment 23 (vno[0] = 251470) erasing segment 24 (vno[0] = 252489) erasing segment 25 (vno[0] = 263868) erasing segment 26 (vno[0] = 273596) erasing segment 27 (vno[0] = 329037) erasing segment 28 (vno[0] = 329154) writing cortex label to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/label/rh.cortex.label... writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.curv writing smoothed area to rh.area writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.area vertex spacing 0.65 +- 0.22 (0.01-->6.62) (max @ vno 176537 --> 328567) face area 0.18 +- 0.12 (0.00-->9.90) repositioning cortical surface to gray/csf boundary. smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 2.000 averaging target values for 5 iterations... inhibiting deformation at non-cortical midline structures... smoothing surface for 5 iterations... reading initial pial vertex positions from white.preaparc... mean border=67.2, 854 (854) missing vertices, mean dist 0.5 [0.7 (%0.0)->1.8 (%100.0))] % 7 local maxima, %17 large gradients and %72 min vals, 1112 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=2.0, host=compu, nav=16, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 1.000 averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=60603148.0, rms=30.601 001: dt: 0.5000, sse=45563932.0, rms=26.471 (13.496%) 002: dt: 0.5000, sse=34793400.0, rms=23.062 (12.879%) 003: dt: 0.5000, sse=27402192.0, rms=20.393 (11.571%) 004: dt: 0.5000, sse=22026030.0, rms=18.206 (10.726%) 005: dt: 0.5000, sse=17402136.0, rms=16.086 (11.644%) 006: dt: 0.5000, sse=13177608.0, rms=13.867 (13.797%) 007: dt: 0.5000, sse=9500786.0, rms=11.593 (16.394%) 008: dt: 0.5000, sse=6725980.5, rms=9.525 (17.841%) 009: dt: 0.5000, sse=4924941.5, rms=7.898 (17.083%) 010: dt: 0.5000, sse=3890419.0, rms=6.790 (14.027%) 011: dt: 0.5000, sse=3342427.0, rms=6.122 (9.844%) 012: dt: 0.5000, sse=3056539.0, rms=5.742 (6.202%) 013: dt: 0.5000, sse=2890509.2, rms=5.508 (4.075%) 014: dt: 0.5000, sse=2819009.0, rms=5.404 (1.892%) 015: dt: 0.5000, sse=2760888.0, rms=5.317 (1.609%) rms = 5.28, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 016: dt: 0.5000, sse=2739176.0, rms=5.284 (0.627%) 017: dt: 0.2500, sse=2339358.0, rms=4.597 (13.001%) 018: dt: 0.2500, sse=2270357.8, rms=4.476 (2.633%) rms = 4.47, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 019: dt: 0.2500, sse=2271278.2, rms=4.475 (0.017%) 020: dt: 0.1250, sse=2117294.5, rms=4.179 (6.621%) rms = 4.13, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 021: dt: 0.1250, sse=2093807.9, rms=4.134 (1.072%) positioning took 9.5 minutes mean border=62.5, 12210 (167) missing vertices, mean dist 0.2 [0.2 (%8.3)->0.7 (%91.7))] % 9 local maxima, %15 large gradients and %69 min vals, 3107 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=1.0, host=compu, nav=8, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.500 averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=6594828.0, rms=9.232 022: dt: 0.5000, sse=4274815.5, rms=6.996 (24.219%) 023: dt: 0.5000, sse=3506427.5, rms=6.101 (12.794%) 024: dt: 0.5000, sse=3224584.8, rms=5.724 (6.184%) 025: dt: 0.5000, sse=3063469.5, rms=5.508 (3.761%) 026: dt: 0.5000, sse=3000042.8, rms=5.408 (1.815%) 027: dt: 0.5000, sse=2935227.5, rms=5.321 (1.608%) rms = 5.29, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 028: dt: 0.5000, sse=2917536.8, rms=5.287 (0.652%) 029: dt: 0.2500, sse=2479751.8, rms=4.547 (13.984%) 030: dt: 0.2500, sse=2404549.8, rms=4.417 (2.869%) rms = 4.52, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 031: dt: 0.1250, sse=2334668.0, rms=4.284 (3.016%) 032: dt: 0.1250, sse=2252829.0, rms=4.121 (3.810%) rms = 4.08, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 033: dt: 0.1250, sse=2234796.0, rms=4.085 (0.870%) positioning took 9.4 minutes mean border=62.0, 19206 (114) missing vertices, mean dist 0.0 [0.1 (%37.9)->0.3 (%62.1))] %10 local maxima, %13 large gradients and %68 min vals, 2086 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.5, host=compu, nav=4, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 averaging target values for 5 iterations... 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2442422.8, rms=4.398 rms = 4.97, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 034: dt: 0.2500, sse=2358612.2, rms=4.241 (3.573%) rms = 4.24, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... rms = 4.21, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 035: dt: 0.1250, sse=2342125.8, rms=4.209 (0.761%) positioning took 2.3 minutes mean border=61.5, 35088 (105) missing vertices, mean dist 0.0 [0.1 (%40.6)->0.2 (%59.4))] %10 local maxima, %12 large gradients and %63 min vals, 1974 gradients ignored tol=1.0e-04, sigma=0.2, host=compu, nav=2, nbrs=2, l_surf_repulse=5.000, l_tspring=1.000, l_nspring=0.668, l_intensity=0.200, l_curv=1.000 mom=0.00, dt=0.50 writing pial surface to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.pial... writing smoothed curvature to rh.curv.pial 000: dt: 0.0000, sse=2405772.2, rms=4.332 rms = 4.56, time step reduction 1 of 3 to 0.250... 036: dt: 0.2500, sse=2340633.2, rms=4.213 (2.755%) 037: dt: 0.2500, sse=2290065.5, rms=4.135 (1.834%) rms = 4.21, time step reduction 2 of 3 to 0.125... 038: dt: 0.1250, sse=2261751.0, rms=4.077 (1.416%) 039: dt: 0.1250, sse=2219590.5, rms=3.991 (2.094%) rms = 3.95, time step reduction 3 of 3 to 0.062... 040: dt: 0.1250, sse=2199952.5, rms=3.955 (0.917%) positioning took 4.5 minutes removing intersecting faces 000: 6 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 1 001: 6 intersecting terminating search with 6 intersecting writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.curv.pial writing smoothed area to rh.area.pial writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.area.pial vertex spacing 0.73 +- 0.35 (0.03-->7.61) (max @ vno 235926 --> 217890) face area 0.21 +- 0.19 (0.00-->9.73) measuring cortical thickness... writing cortical thickness estimate to 'thickness' file. 0 of 330866 vertices processed 25000 of 330866 vertices processed 50000 of 330866 vertices processed 75000 of 330866 vertices processed 100000 of 330866 vertices processed 125000 of 330866 vertices processed 150000 of 330866 vertices processed 175000 of 330866 vertices processed 200000 of 330866 vertices processed 225000 of 330866 vertices processed 250000 of 330866 vertices processed 275000 of 330866 vertices processed 300000 of 330866 vertices processed 325000 of 330866 vertices processed 0 of 330866 vertices processed 25000 of 330866 vertices processed 50000 of 330866 vertices processed 75000 of 330866 vertices processed 100000 of 330866 vertices processed 125000 of 330866 vertices processed 150000 of 330866 vertices processed 175000 of 330866 vertices processed 200000 of 330866 vertices processed 225000 of 330866 vertices processed 250000 of 330866 vertices processed 275000 of 330866 vertices processed 300000 of 330866 vertices processed 325000 of 330866 vertices processed thickness calculation complete, 212:1408 truncations. 61017 vertices at 0 distance 183654 vertices at 1 distance 184167 vertices at 2 distance 110211 vertices at 3 distance 55267 vertices at 4 distance 24751 vertices at 5 distance 10789 vertices at 6 distance 4651 vertices at 7 distance 2085 vertices at 8 distance 986 vertices at 9 distance 508 vertices at 10 distance 322 vertices at 11 distance 195 vertices at 12 distance 153 vertices at 13 distance 121 vertices at 14 distance 74 vertices at 15 distance 72 vertices at 16 distance 67 vertices at 17 distance 64 vertices at 18 distance 65 vertices at 19 distance 93 vertices at 20 distance writing curvature file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.thickness positioning took 43.5 minutes #-------------------------------------------- #@# Refine Pial Surfs w/ T2/FLAIR Sat Jul 15 13:22:36 EDT 2017 bbregister --s nmr01106 --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz --lta /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.lta --init-coreg --T2 tmp /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554 Log file is /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat.log Sat Jul 15 13:22:37 EDT 2017 setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects cd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/bin/bbregister --s nmr01106 --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz --lta /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.lta --init-coreg --T2 $Id: bbregister,v 1.75 2016/05/10 20:02:28 greve Exp $ Linux compute-0-37 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer/dev mri_convert /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii mri_convert.bin /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz... TR=8000.00, TE=387.00, TI=2150.00, flip angle=120.00 i_ras = (-0.11874, -0.992901, -0.00697291) j_ras = (-0.0476783, 0.012716, -0.998782) k_ras = (-0.99178, 0.118263, 0.0488498) writing to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii... mri_coreg --s nmr01106 --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --regdat /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.init.dat --reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/mri_coreg.lta --nthreads 4 --dof 6 --sep 4 --ftol .0001 --linmintol .01 --no-ref-mask $Id: mri_coreg.c,v 1.27 2016/04/30 15:11:49 greve Exp $ cwd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts cmdline mri_coreg --s nmr01106 --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --regdat /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.init.dat --reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/mri_coreg.lta --nthreads 4 --dof 6 --sep 4 --ftol .0001 --linmintol .01 --no-ref-mask sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 user tgholipo dof 6 nsep 1 cras0 1 ftol 0.000100 linmintol 0.010000 bf 1 bflim 30.000000 bfnsamp 30 SmoothRef 0 SatPct 99.990000 MovOOB 0 optschema 1 Reading in mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii Reading in ref /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brainmask.mgz Setting cras translation parameters to align centers Creating random numbers for coordinate dithering Performing intensity dithering Initial parameters -0.6023 -4.8416 -0.0543 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Separation list (1): 4 min = 4 DoSmoothing 1 DoCoordDither 1 DoIntensityDither 1 nitersmax 4 ftol 1.000e-04 linmintol 1.000e-02 SatPct 99.990000 Hist FWHM 7.000000 7.000000 nthreads 4 movsat = 231.0000 mov gstd 1.9188 1.9188 1.9188 Smoothing mov refsat = 132.0000 ref gstd 1.9189 1.9189 1.9189 Smoothing ref COREGpreproc() done Testing if mov and target overlap Init cost -1.0617814421 nhits = 356683 out of 40001688, Percent Overlap: 57.1 Initial RefRAS-to-MovRAS 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -0.60235; 0.00000 1.00000 0.00000 -4.84164; 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 -0.05431; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Initial RefVox-to-MovVox 0.11851 0.00696 -0.99097 287.06738; 0.04759 0.99683 0.01269 -20.73750; 0.98985 -0.04875 0.11803 -53.08070; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; sep = 4 ----------------------------------- COREGoptBruteForce() 30 1 30 Turning on MovOOB for BruteForce Search #BF# sep= 4 iter=0 lim=30.0 delta=2.00 -0.60235 1.15836 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0555959 Turning MovOOB back off after brute force search --------------------------------- Init Powel Params dof = 6 Starting OpenPowel2(), sep = 4 InitialCost -1.0691541433 #@# 4 188 -0.60235 1.15836 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0691541 fs_powell::minimize nparams 6 maxfev 4 ftol 0.000100 linmin_xtol_ 0.010000 powell nthiter 0: fret = -1.069154 #@# 4 190 0.39765 1.15836 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0698822 #@# 4 194 0.01569 1.15836 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0698999 #@# 4 195 0.18737 1.15836 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0699395 #@# 4 202 0.19737 0.54033 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0701801 #@# 4 204 0.19737 0.56527 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0701815 #@# 4 205 0.19737 0.60172 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0701827 #@# 4 208 0.19737 0.59172 -2.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0701829 #@# 4 211 0.19737 0.59172 -1.05431 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0708572 #@# 4 216 0.19737 0.59172 -1.15072 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0708656 #@# 4 218 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0708660 #@# 4 222 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0716127 #@# 4 226 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.61803 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0716499 #@# 4 227 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.77138 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0716902 #@# 4 228 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.78138 0.00000 0.00000 -1.0716903 #@# 4 235 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.78138 0.38197 0.00000 -1.0717183 #@# 4 236 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.78138 0.26347 0.00000 -1.0717272 #@# 4 238 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.78138 0.27932 0.00000 -1.0717283 #@# 4 247 0.19737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0717292 powell nthiter 1: fret = -1.071729 #@# 4 257 0.20737 0.59172 -1.14072 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0717300 #@# 4 267 0.22435 0.73554 -1.14072 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0717558 #@# 4 268 0.22435 0.74666 -1.14072 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0717560 #@# 4 275 0.22435 0.76666 -0.14072 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0719589 #@# 4 279 0.22435 0.76666 -0.52269 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0721719 #@# 4 281 0.22435 0.76666 -0.55758 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0721735 #@# 4 283 0.22435 0.76666 -0.54758 0.78138 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0721737 #@# 4 290 0.22435 0.76666 -0.54758 1.16334 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0723618 #@# 4 291 0.22435 0.76666 -0.54758 1.15334 0.27932 -0.03872 -1.0723621 #@# 4 301 0.22435 0.76666 -0.54758 1.14334 0.41939 -0.03872 -1.0723774 #@# 4 313 0.25133 0.94161 0.04557 1.50531 0.55945 -0.03872 -1.0725542 #@# 4 320 0.24690 0.91291 -0.05173 1.44594 0.53648 -0.03872 -1.0725596 powell nthiter 2: fret = -1.072560 #@# 4 329 0.25717 0.91466 -0.04580 1.44956 0.53788 -0.03872 -1.0725600 #@# 4 337 0.25717 0.82235 -0.04580 1.44956 0.53788 -0.03872 -1.0725659 #@# 4 346 0.25717 0.82235 -0.04580 1.44956 0.53788 -0.06106 -1.0725664 #@# 4 347 0.25717 0.82235 -0.04580 1.44956 0.53788 -0.07106 -1.0725665 #@# 4 356 0.25717 0.82235 -0.04580 1.41730 0.53788 -0.07106 -1.0725685 #@# 4 367 0.25717 0.82235 -0.04580 1.41730 0.54882 -0.07106 -1.0725687 #@# 4 375 0.25857 0.83142 -0.01506 1.43606 0.55608 -0.07106 -1.0725702 #@# 4 376 0.25918 0.83538 -0.00163 1.44425 0.55925 -0.07106 -1.0725708 Powell done niters total = 2 OptTimeSec 35.4 sec OptTimeMin 0.59 min nEvals 380 Final parameters 0.25918245 0.83537823 -0.00163275 1.44425023 0.55924660 -0.07105680 Final cost -1.072570756123597 --------------------------------- mri_coreg utimesec 505.040222 mri_coreg stimesec 1.605755 mri_coreg ru_maxrss 902108 mri_coreg ru_ixrss 0 mri_coreg ru_idrss 0 mri_coreg ru_isrss 0 mri_coreg ru_minflt 422517 mri_coreg ru_majflt 12 mri_coreg ru_nswap 0 mri_coreg ru_inblock 9688 mri_coreg ru_oublock 16 mri_coreg ru_msgsnd 0 mri_coreg ru_msgrcv 0 mri_coreg ru_nsignals 0 mri_coreg ru_nvcsw 2560 mri_coreg ru_nivcsw 4437 Final RefRAS-to-MovRAS 0.99995 -0.00124 0.00976 0.25918; 0.00099 0.99968 0.02520 0.83538; -0.00979 -0.02519 0.99963 -0.00163; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Final RefVox-to-MovVox 0.11942 0.03309 -0.99033 276.13412; 0.03781 0.99662 0.03786 -21.38741; 0.99016 -0.04205 0.11799 -54.15796; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Final parameters 0.2592 0.8354 -0.0016 1.4443 0.5592 -0.0711 nhits = 356679 out of 40001688, Percent Overlap: 57.1 mri_coreg RunTimeSec 199.5 sec To check run: tkregisterfv --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --targ /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brainmask.mgz --reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/mri_coreg.lta --s nmr01106 --surfs mri_coreg done mri_segreg --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --init-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.init.dat --out-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat --subsamp-brute 100 --subsamp 100 --tol 1e-4 --tol1d 1e-3 --brute -4 4 4 --surf white --gm-proj-frac 0.5 --gm-gt-wm 0.5 $Id: mri_segreg.c,v 1.113 2016/05/10 03:23:20 greve Exp $ setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects cd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mri_segreg --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --init-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.init.dat --out-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat --subsamp-brute 100 --subsamp 100 --tol 1e-4 --tol1d 1e-3 --brute -4 4 4 --surf white --gm-proj-frac 0.5 --gm-gt-wm 0.5 sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 user tgholipo movvol /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii regfile /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.init.dat subject nmr01106 dof 6 outregfile /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat UseMask 0 UseLH 1 UseRH 1 nsubsamp 100 PenaltySign -1 PenaltySlope 0.500000 PenaltyCenter 0.000000 surfname white GMProjFrac 0.500000 WMProjAbs 2.000000 lhcostfile (null) rhcostfile (null) interp trilinear (1) frame 0 TolPowell 0.000100 nMaxItersPowell 36 n1dmin 3 Profile 0 Gdiag_no -1 AddNoise 0 (0) SynthSeed 1501050869 TransRandMax 0.000000 RotRandMax 0.000000 Translations 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Rotations 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Input reg 0.11965 0.99226 0.03315 5.34980; -0.99209 0.11822 0.04213 0.10916; 0.03789 -0.03793 0.99856 -1.48022; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Loading mov Projecting LH Surfs Loading lh.white surf Loading lh.thickness for GM GM Proj: 1 0.500000 2.000000 WM Proj: 0 0.500000 2.000000 Projecting RH Surfs Loading rh.white surf Loading rh.thickness for GM Projecting RH Surfs Using lh.cortex.label Using rh.cortex.label Computing relative cost 0 -25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.015355 1 -25.0 -25.0 25.0 1.000145 2 -25.0 25.0 -25.0 0.991197 3 -25.0 25.0 25.0 1.014245 4 25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.002191 5 25.0 -25.0 25.0 0.998444 6 25.0 25.0 -25.0 1.030804 7 25.0 25.0 25.0 1.020301 REL: 8 0.260162 8.072683 1.009085 rel = 0.25782 Initial costs ---------------- Number of surface hits 6869 WM Intensity 127.8701 +/- 17.2028 Ctx Intensity 150.7773 +/- 20.6462 Pct Contrast 16.1102 +/- 21.8565 Cost 0.2602 RelCost 0.2578 ------------------------------------ Brute force preopt -4 4 4, n = 729 0 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 1.0136 1.0136 0.0 1 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 1.0123 1.0123 0.0 2 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 4.0000 0.9989 0.9989 0.0 5 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 4.0000 0.9686 0.9686 0.0 7 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 4.0000 0.0000 0.9633 0.9633 0.0 15 -4.0000 -4.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 4.0000 -4.0000 0.9539 0.9539 0.0 34 -4.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 -4.0000 4.0000 0.0000 0.9491 0.9491 0.0 39 -4.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -4.0000 0.9485 0.9485 0.0 41 -4.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000 0.9323 0.9323 0.0 97 -4.0000 0.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 4.0000 0.0000 0.8988 0.8988 0.0 121 -4.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8940 0.8940 0.0 124 -4.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000 0.0000 0.8898 0.8898 0.0 274 0.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 -4.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8590 0.8590 0.1 364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2602 0.2602 0.1 Brute Force -------------------------- Min cost was 0.260162 Number of iterations 729 Search time 8.994000 sec Parameters at best (transmm, rotdeg) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -------------------------------------------- Starting Powell Minimization Init Powel Params dof = 6 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 fs_powell::minimize nparams 6 maxfev 36 ftol 0.000100 linmin_xtol_ 0.001000 powell nthiter 0: fret = 0.260162 7 -0.262 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2473521646 9 -0.261 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2473473900 13 -0.252 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2473403946 14 -0.255 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2473379635 15 -0.254 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2473378116 22 -0.254 0.100 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2440265031 23 -0.254 0.133 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2439455359 26 -0.254 0.128 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2439371711 35 -0.254 0.128 0.076 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2420504925 37 -0.254 0.128 0.075 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2420365397 39 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2419544706 49 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.054 0.000 0.000 0.2414566320 50 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.057 0.000 0.000 0.2414565979 52 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 0.000 0.000 0.2414531367 60 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.192 0.000 0.2393287005 61 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.130 0.000 0.2381917266 62 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.121 0.000 0.2381787115 64 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.075 0.000 0.2378156673 66 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.092 0.000 0.2376791647 67 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.090 0.000 0.2376754606 68 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.000 0.2376741783 77 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.075 0.2357217785 78 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.105 0.2354855306 79 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.113 0.2354074913 82 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.128 0.2353870386 83 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.122 0.2353818169 84 -0.254 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2353812846 powell nthiter 1: fret = 0.235381 93 -0.192 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2339421420 95 -0.196 0.128 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2339259646 105 -0.196 0.181 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2330288153 106 -0.196 0.205 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2330149887 107 -0.196 0.194 0.065 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2329842513 116 -0.196 0.194 0.161 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2309082714 118 -0.196 0.194 0.154 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2308580827 120 -0.196 0.194 0.139 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2307752375 121 -0.196 0.194 0.138 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2307723542 122 -0.196 0.194 0.131 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2307658091 123 -0.196 0.194 0.133 0.056 -0.089 0.123 0.2307622244 133 -0.196 0.194 0.133 0.036 -0.089 0.123 0.2307351562 134 -0.196 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.089 0.123 0.2307273702 144 -0.196 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.243 0.123 0.2304447996 145 -0.196 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.123 0.2278611680 157 -0.196 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2278592566 160 -0.138 0.260 0.200 0.033 -0.253 0.128 0.2265765750 powell nthiter 2: fret = 0.227859 167 -0.104 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2253717331 168 -0.075 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2253269689 169 -0.086 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2252894623 170 -0.087 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2252881198 171 -0.090 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2252875265 174 -0.089 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2252875053 175 -0.088 0.194 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2252872107 184 -0.088 0.211 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2251759331 185 -0.088 0.209 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2251732130 186 -0.088 0.208 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2251715446 188 -0.088 0.207 0.133 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2251714179 196 -0.088 0.207 0.189 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2246393661 198 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.044 -0.171 0.126 0.2243139047 209 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.171 0.126 0.2243133406 218 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.197 0.126 0.2233384606 219 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.224 0.126 0.2230096940 220 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.223 0.126 0.2230045092 221 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.220 0.126 0.2229949197 224 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.219 0.126 0.2229931783 232 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.219 0.105 0.2228286691 235 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.219 0.113 0.2228248159 236 -0.088 0.207 0.167 0.043 -0.219 0.111 0.2228235787 239 0.020 0.221 0.202 0.041 -0.267 0.096 0.2199387348 242 0.196 0.242 0.258 0.038 -0.344 0.071 0.2198819512 243 0.110 0.232 0.231 0.039 -0.306 0.083 0.2194970772 245 0.076 0.227 0.220 0.040 -0.291 0.088 0.2194858674 247 0.092 0.229 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.086 0.2194236460 250 0.091 0.229 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.086 0.2194234838 powell nthiter 3: fret = 0.219423 260 0.091 0.229 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.115 0.2191569149 263 0.091 0.229 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.120 0.2191511564 265 0.091 0.229 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2191496188 274 0.091 0.261 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189801750 275 0.091 0.258 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189540763 276 0.091 0.251 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189494973 278 0.091 0.254 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189405805 279 0.091 0.255 0.225 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189402149 288 0.091 0.255 0.220 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189242467 289 0.091 0.255 0.216 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189159103 291 0.091 0.255 0.213 0.040 -0.298 0.118 0.2189149573 301 0.091 0.255 0.213 0.064 -0.298 0.118 0.2188895799 303 0.091 0.255 0.213 0.075 -0.298 0.118 0.2188380893 305 0.091 0.255 0.213 0.076 -0.298 0.118 0.2188378668 314 0.091 0.255 0.213 0.076 -0.320 0.118 0.2183056904 316 0.091 0.255 0.213 0.076 -0.324 0.118 0.2182915470 324 0.133 0.260 0.227 0.076 -0.343 0.113 0.2177146263 326 0.137 0.260 0.228 0.076 -0.344 0.112 0.2176878059 327 0.141 0.261 0.229 0.075 -0.346 0.112 0.2176844685 328 0.140 0.261 0.229 0.076 -0.346 0.112 0.2176830260 329 0.139 0.261 0.229 0.076 -0.346 0.112 0.2176829889 powell nthiter 4: fret = 0.217683 340 0.139 0.261 0.229 0.076 -0.346 0.128 0.2175669812 343 0.139 0.261 0.229 0.076 -0.346 0.127 0.2175663100 353 0.139 0.273 0.229 0.076 -0.346 0.127 0.2174543412 354 0.139 0.274 0.229 0.076 -0.346 0.127 0.2174520283 365 0.139 0.274 0.234 0.076 -0.346 0.127 0.2174342397 366 0.139 0.274 0.233 0.076 -0.346 0.127 0.2174310973 387 0.139 0.274 0.233 0.076 -0.363 0.127 0.2173443434 389 0.139 0.274 0.233 0.076 -0.356 0.127 0.2173067158 398 0.133 0.274 0.231 0.076 -0.353 0.128 0.2172815587 400 0.133 0.273 0.231 0.076 -0.353 0.128 0.2172809590 powell nthiter 5: fret = 0.217281 422 0.133 0.277 0.231 0.076 -0.353 0.128 0.2172481101 423 0.133 0.281 0.231 0.076 -0.353 0.128 0.2172312072 437 0.133 0.281 0.232 0.076 -0.353 0.128 0.2172298937 448 0.133 0.281 0.232 0.075 -0.353 0.128 0.2172286265 458 0.133 0.281 0.232 0.075 -0.360 0.128 0.2172234327 459 0.133 0.281 0.232 0.075 -0.357 0.128 0.2172133498 469 0.131 0.281 0.231 0.075 -0.356 0.128 0.2172093656 470 0.131 0.281 0.231 0.075 -0.356 0.128 0.2172092697 481 0.130 0.284 0.231 0.074 -0.357 0.128 0.2172013085 powell nthiter 6: fret = 0.217201 499 0.130 0.284 0.231 0.074 -0.357 0.125 0.2171906951 510 0.129 0.283 0.231 0.074 -0.356 0.125 0.2171901530 512 0.129 0.283 0.231 0.074 -0.357 0.125 0.2171898864 555 0.129 0.286 0.231 0.074 -0.358 0.125 0.2171898072 556 0.129 0.285 0.231 0.074 -0.357 0.125 0.2171879261 557 0.129 0.285 0.231 0.074 -0.357 0.125 0.2171877520 Powell done niters = 6 Computing relative cost 0 -25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.014337 1 -25.0 -25.0 25.0 0.999519 2 -25.0 25.0 -25.0 0.991872 3 -25.0 25.0 25.0 1.018258 4 25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.009760 5 25.0 -25.0 25.0 1.002587 6 25.0 25.0 -25.0 1.025605 7 25.0 25.0 25.0 1.018978 REL: 8 0.217188 8.080915 1.010114 rel = 0.215013 Number of iterations 6 Min cost was 0.217188 Number of FunctionCalls 564 TolPowell 0.000100 nMaxItersPowell 36 OptimizationTime 6.970000 sec Parameters at optimum (transmm) 0.12891 0.28482 0.23090 Parameters at optimum (rotdeg) 0.07412 -0.35719 0.12486 Final costs ---------------- Number of surface hits 6869 WM Intensity 127.7518 +/- 17.3782 Ctx Intensity 151.5995 +/- 20.1788 Pct Contrast 16.8812 +/- 21.0416 Cost 0.2172 RelCost 0.2578 Reg at min cost was 0.12158 0.99222 0.02684 5.48758; -0.99188 0.12044 0.04090 0.40757; 0.03735 -0.03159 0.99880 -1.21580; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Writing optimal reg to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat, type = 14 Original Reg 0.11965 0.99226 0.03315 5.34980; -0.99209 0.11822 0.04213 0.10916; 0.03789 -0.03793 0.99856 -1.48022; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Original Reg - Optimal Reg -0.00193 0.00004 0.00632 -0.13778; -0.00021 -0.00221 0.00123 -0.29841; 0.00054 -0.00634 -0.00024 -0.26443; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000; Computing change in lh position LH rmsDiffMean 0.424864 Computing change in rh position Surface-RMS-Diff-mm 0.407835 0.180072 0.893288 mri_segreg done mri_segreg --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --init-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat --out-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat --interp trilinear --wm-proj-abs 2 --tol 1e-8 --tol1d 1e-3 --c0 0 --mincost /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat.mincost --dof 6 --nmax 36 --param /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat.param --surf white --brute -0.1 0.1 0.1 --cur-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.curopt.dat --gm-proj-frac 0.5 --nsub 1 --gm-gt-wm 0.5 $Id: mri_segreg.c,v 1.113 2016/05/10 03:23:20 greve Exp $ setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects cd /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts mri_segreg --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii --init-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat --out-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat --interp trilinear --wm-proj-abs 2 --tol 1e-8 --tol1d 1e-3 --c0 0 --mincost /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat.mincost --dof 6 --nmax 36 --param /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat.param --surf white --brute -0.1 0.1 0.1 --cur-reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/reg.curopt.dat --gm-proj-frac 0.5 --nsub 1 --gm-gt-wm 0.5 sysname Linux hostname compute-0-37 machine x86_64 user tgholipo movvol /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/template.nii regfile /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/tmp.bbregister.2554/bbr.pass1.dat subject nmr01106 dof 6 outregfile /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat UseMask 0 UseLH 1 UseRH 1 nsubsamp 1 PenaltySign -1 PenaltySlope 0.500000 PenaltyCenter 0.000000 surfname white GMProjFrac 0.500000 WMProjAbs 2.000000 lhcostfile (null) rhcostfile (null) interp trilinear (1) frame 0 TolPowell 0.000000 nMaxItersPowell 36 n1dmin 3 Profile 0 Gdiag_no -1 AddNoise 0 (0) SynthSeed 1500970558 TransRandMax 0.000000 RotRandMax 0.000000 Translations 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Rotations 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Input reg 0.12158 0.99222 0.02684 5.48758; -0.99188 0.12044 0.04090 0.40757; 0.03735 -0.03159 0.99880 -1.21580; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Loading mov Projecting LH Surfs Loading lh.white surf Loading lh.thickness for GM GM Proj: 1 0.500000 2.000000 WM Proj: 0 0.500000 2.000000 Projecting RH Surfs Loading rh.white surf Loading rh.thickness for GM Projecting RH Surfs Using lh.cortex.label Using rh.cortex.label Computing relative cost 0 -25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.006965 1 -25.0 -25.0 25.0 1.001305 2 -25.0 25.0 -25.0 1.005694 3 -25.0 25.0 25.0 1.015935 4 25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.006969 5 25.0 -25.0 25.0 1.010147 6 25.0 25.0 -25.0 1.023733 7 25.0 25.0 25.0 1.007707 REL: 8 0.231447 8.078457 1.009807 rel = 0.229199 Initial costs ---------------- Number of surface hits 686982 WM Intensity 127.8726 +/- 17.3016 Ctx Intensity 151.5691 +/- 19.7746 Pct Contrast 16.8419 +/- 20.8681 Cost 0.2314 RelCost 0.2292 ------------------------------------ Brute force preopt -0.1 0.1 0.1, n = 729 0 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 0.2278 0.2278 0.0 3 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 0.0000 -0.1000 0.2234 0.2234 0.0 6 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 0.1000 -0.1000 0.2233 0.2233 0.0 12 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 -0.1000 0.2232 0.2232 0.0 16 -0.1000 -0.1000 -0.1000 0.0000 0.1000 0.0000 0.2229 0.2229 0.0 30 -0.1000 -0.1000 0.0000 -0.1000 0.0000 -0.1000 0.2202 0.2202 0.0 148 -0.1000 0.0000 0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2198 0.2198 0.0 274 0.0000 -0.1000 0.0000 -0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2195 0.2195 0.1 283 0.0000 -0.1000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2189 0.2189 0.1 364 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2172 0.2172 0.1 Brute Force -------------------------- Min cost was 0.217188 Number of iterations 729 Search time 8.319000 sec Parameters at best (transmm, rotdeg) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -------------------------------------------- Starting Powell Minimization Init Powel Params dof = 6 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 fs_powell::minimize nparams 6 maxfev 36 ftol 0.000000 linmin_xtol_ 0.001000 powell nthiter 0: fret = 0.231447 7 -0.078 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2310073376 8 -0.063 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2309781477 9 -0.062 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2309772806 10 -0.056 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2309761763 12 -0.058 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2309755755 21 -0.058 -0.054 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2305646786 22 -0.058 -0.058 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2305515295 23 -0.058 -0.078 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2305458615 25 -0.058 -0.069 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2305355065 34 -0.058 -0.069 0.037 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2302103493 35 -0.058 -0.069 0.047 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2301981342 38 -0.058 -0.069 0.049 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2301977023 39 -0.058 -0.069 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.2301977014 54 -0.058 -0.069 0.050 0.000 -0.011 0.000 0.2301631295 63 -0.058 -0.069 0.050 0.000 -0.011 -0.027 0.2300616617 64 -0.058 -0.069 0.050 0.000 -0.011 -0.026 0.2300610113 65 -0.058 -0.069 0.050 0.000 -0.011 -0.025 0.2300604631 powell nthiter 1: fret = 0.230060 76 -0.062 -0.069 0.050 0.000 -0.011 -0.025 0.2300583511 88 -0.062 -0.070 0.050 0.000 -0.011 -0.025 0.2300580341 104 -0.062 -0.070 0.050 -0.001 -0.011 -0.025 0.2300579704 112 -0.062 -0.070 0.050 -0.001 -0.010 -0.025 0.2300578000 121 -0.062 -0.070 0.050 -0.001 -0.010 -0.026 0.2300577934 128 -0.063 -0.071 0.050 -0.001 -0.009 -0.026 0.2300575975 129 -0.063 -0.071 0.050 -0.001 -0.009 -0.026 0.2300573217 132 -0.063 -0.071 0.050 -0.001 -0.009 -0.026 0.2300573166 powell nthiter 2: fret = 0.230057 Powell done niters = 2 Computing relative cost 0 -25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.006794 1 -25.0 -25.0 25.0 1.000912 2 -25.0 25.0 -25.0 1.005752 3 -25.0 25.0 25.0 1.017203 4 25.0 -25.0 -25.0 1.007941 5 25.0 -25.0 25.0 1.009673 6 25.0 25.0 -25.0 1.023986 7 25.0 25.0 25.0 1.006923 REL: 8 0.230057 8.079185 1.009898 rel = 0.227802 Number of iterations 2 Min cost was 0.230057 Number of FunctionCalls 197 TolPowell 0.000000 nMaxItersPowell 36 OptimizationTime 71.531000 sec Parameters at optimum (transmm) -0.06291 -0.07073 0.04975 Parameters at optimum (rotdeg) -0.00133 -0.00909 -0.02627 Final costs ---------------- Number of surface hits 686982 WM Intensity 127.8823 +/- 17.2601 Ctx Intensity 151.6558 +/- 19.6634 Pct Contrast 16.8992 +/- 20.7971 Cost 0.2301 RelCost 0.2292 Reg at min cost was 0.12112 0.99228 0.02670 5.42505; -0.99193 0.11998 0.04091 0.33430; 0.03739 -0.03144 0.99881 -1.16519; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Writing optimal reg to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat, type = 14 Original Reg 0.12158 0.99222 0.02684 5.48758; -0.99188 0.12044 0.04090 0.40757; 0.03735 -0.03159 0.99880 -1.21580; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Original Reg - Optimal Reg 0.00046 -0.00006 0.00014 0.06253; 0.00005 0.00046 -0.00001 0.07328; -0.00004 -0.00015 -0.00000 -0.05061; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000; Computing change in lh position LH rmsDiffMean 0.099260 Computing change in rh position Surface-RMS-Diff-mm 0.107022 0.019150 0.149085 mri_segreg done MinCost: 0.230057 127.882350 151.655767 16.899166 tkregister2_cmdl --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz --reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat --noedit --ltaout /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.lta tkregister_tcl /usr/local/freesurfer/dev/tktools/tkregister2.tcl INFO: no target volume specified, assuming FreeSurfer orig volume. target volume orig movable volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz reg file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.dat LoadVol 0 ZeroCRAS 0 $Id: tkregister2.c,v 1.133 2016/08/02 21:17:11 greve Exp $ Diagnostic Level -1 ---- Input registration matrix -------- 0.12112 0.99228 0.02670 5.42505; -0.99193 0.11998 0.04091 0.33430; 0.03739 -0.03144 0.99881 -1.16519; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; float2int = 0 --------------------------------------- INFO: loading target /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz INFO: target does not conform to COR format, so I'm going to reslice to COR. This will not affect the final registration. Ttarg: -------------------- -1.00000 0.00000 0.00000 128.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000 -128.00000; 0.00000 -1.00000 0.00000 128.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; INFO: loading movable /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz Tmov: -------------------- -0.75000 0.00000 0.00000 105.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.75000 -96.00000; 0.00000 -0.75000 0.00000 120.00000; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; mkheaderreg = 0, float2int = 0 ---- Input registration matrix -------- 0.12112 0.99228 0.02670 5.42505; -0.99193 0.11998 0.04091 0.33430; 0.03739 -0.03144 0.99881 -1.16519; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Determinant 1 subject = nmr01106 RegMat --------------------------- 0.12112 0.99228 0.02670 5.42505; -0.99193 0.11998 0.04091 0.33430; 0.03739 -0.03144 0.99881 -1.16519; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; Cleaning up Started at Sat Jul 15 13:22:37 EDT 2017 Ended at Sat Jul 15 13:28:50 EDT 2017 BBR-Run-Time-Sec 373 bbregister Done To check results, run: tkregisterfv --mov /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz --reg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.lta --surfs cp /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.auto.lta /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.lta mri_convert -odt float -at /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.lta -rl /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.prenorm.mgz mri_convert.bin -odt float -at /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.lta -rl /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.prenorm.mgz $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.227 2017/02/16 19:15:42 greve Exp $ reading from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig/FLAIRraw.mgz... TR=8000.00, TE=387.00, TI=2150.00, flip angle=120.00 i_ras = (-0.11874, -0.992901, -0.00697291) j_ras = (-0.0476783, 0.012716, -0.998782) k_ras = (-0.99178, 0.118263, 0.0488498) INFO: Reading transformation from file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.lta... Reading transform with LTAreadEx() reading template info from volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/orig.mgz... INFO: Applying transformation from file /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/transforms/FLAIRraw.lta... --------------------------------- INFO: Transform Matrix (linear_ras_to_ras) 0.99994 0.00248 -0.01027 -0.15858; -0.00267 0.99982 -0.01862 -0.64154; 0.01022 0.01865 0.99977 0.01022; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; --------------------------------- Applying LTAtransformInterp (resample_type 1) changing data type from short to float (noscale = 0)... writing to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.prenorm.mgz... mri_normalize -sigma 0.5 -nonmax_suppress 0 -min_dist 1 -aseg /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/aseg.presurf.mgz -surface /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/rh.white identity.nofile -surface /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.white identity.nofile /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.prenorm.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.norm.mgz using Gaussian smoothing of bias field, sigma=0.500 disabling nonmaximum suppression retaining points that are at least 1.000mm from the boundary using segmentation for initial intensity normalization reading from /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.prenorm.mgz... computing distance transform computing distance transform 210241 non wm control points removed building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing, sigma = 0... smoothing bias field with sigma=0.500 writing normalized volume to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.norm.mgz mri_mask /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.norm.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brainmask.mgz /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.mgz DoAbs = 0 Writing masked volume to /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/FLAIR.mgz...done. /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/scripts cp -v /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.pial /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.woFLAIR.pial `/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.pial' -> `/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/surf/lh.woFLAIR.pial' mris_make_surfaces -orig_white white -orig_pial woFLAIR.pial -aseg ../mri/aseg -nowhite -mgz -T1 brain.finalsurfs -FLAIR ../mri/FLAIR -nsigma_above 3 -nsigma_below 3 -max_gray_at_csf_border 60 -max_csf 35 nmr01106 lh reading previously compute gray/white surface deforming surfaces based on FLAIR volume ../mri/FLAIR using T2 threshold of 3.00 sigmas above the mean (default=2) using T2 threshold of 3.00 sigmas below the mean (default=2) using white starting white location... using woFLAIR.pial starting pial locations... using aseg volume ../mri/aseg to prevent surfaces crossing the midline INFO: assuming MGZ format for volumes. using brain.finalsurfs as T1 volume... setting default FLAIR deformation parameters to: T2_max_inside = 300.0 T2_min_inside = 110.0 T2_min_outside = 130.0 T2_max_outside = 300.0 max_pial_averages = 4 max_outward_dist = 3.0 Ghisto_min_inside_peak_pct = 0.01 Ghisto_min_outside_peak_pct = 0.50 parms.l_repulse = 0.025 parms.l_curv = 0.5 parms.l_nspring = 1.0 parms.l_location = 0.5 $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.172 2017/02/16 19:42:36 fischl Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.793 2017/02/16 19:43:03 fischl Exp $ reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/filled.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/brain.finalsurfs.mgz... reading volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.mgz... mghRead(/autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.mgz, -1): could not open file mris_make_surfaces: could not read segmentation volume /autofs/cluster/neuromind/taha/7tproject/subjects/nmr01106/mri/../mri/aseg.mgz Linux compute-0-37 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all -s nmr01106 exited with ERRORS at Sat Jul 15 13:32:41 EDT 2017 To report a problem, see http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting