Dear Experts,
I am a beginner to the use of Freesurfer and
having just installed version 5.1.0 (Centos 64bit) I have been going
through the processing pipeline with one of our own datasets (3T GE
Excite II scanner - coronal T1-weighted volumetric acquisition sequence
with 1.1-mm thick slices). recon-all works fine and I have been looking
at the outputs.
I have a question regarding the subcortical segmentation especially
around the basal ganglia - during the intensity normalisation it appears
to have assigned similar high (110) voxel values to parts of the internal capsule,
pallidum and thalamus (pic1- brainmask.mgz), though the actual
segmentation (pic2-aseg) looks reasonable when compared with the
native image (pic3-raw T1) (though I appreciate one is normalised
and the other is not). Should I be worried about this (and if so how
can I correct ?) or is this intensity normalisation used only in the
surface stream with a different intensity normalisation used in the
volume stream ? Or ... is it used in the volume stream but the other
parts of the model (eg priors from atlas etc) compensate in some way.
Thanks.
Mo
PS I can post screen