External Email - Use Caution
Hi Douglas,
Thank you for the response.
I did not use mris_preproc to prepared the data.
The data was mapped to fsaverage using recon-all with -qcache. I then loaded the l/rh.area.pial.fwhm15.fsaverage.mgh files into MATLAB using
SurfStatReadData and summed them across each vertex.
Would the terminal output of recon-all -qcache be helpful?
Best, Derek
![]()
Derek Sayre Andrews, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
The M.I.N.D Institute
University of California Davis
Telephone: +1 916 703 0360
Email: dandrews@UCDavis.edu
From: <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Friday, August 10, 2018 at 10:25 AM
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Area in Toddlers/Children
It should be preserving total surface area. Can you send your mris_preproc command line and the terminal output? It might be something with 5.1 as well.
On 8/9/18 3:49 PM, Derek Sayre Andrews wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer Developers and Experts,
I have been exploring various vertex wise (mass univariate) effects using freesurfer measures of cortical thickness and surface area in a cohort of toddlers/children aged 25-70 months.
When looking at the effect of age on surface area using individuals’ measures mapped to fsaverage and smoothed at 15mm fwhm (area.pial. fwhm15.fsaverage.mgh) I observed a widespread negative effect of age (i.e. decreased surface area with age). Given the age group of the cohort this seems implausible. Plotting the sum of each individuals lh+rh.area.pialfsaverage.fwhm15.mgh against age shows the relationship:
However, plotting the lh+rh total surface area returned by mris_anatomical_stats reveals a much more plausible relationship between surface area and age:
My working hypothesis is that the significantly smaller brain sizes of our cohort compared to fsaverage, and the fact(?) that -qcache does not preserve global surface area, is causing an “over adjustment” in our cohorts smallest brains when mapped to fsaverage.
Thus, my questions are three fold
- Is the mapping of our significantly smaller brains to fsaverage a potential explanation for the results we are seeing in our mass univariate analyses of surface area?
- If this is the case, would this effect be limited to surface area or also extend to other freesurfer measures including cortical thickness, lGI, sulcal depth etc.
- How would you recommend approaching vertex wise analyses in a cohort of this age? Create a study specific average subject using make_average_subject to map onto?
Thank you for your insight and guidance!
Best, Derek
PS: All processing was performed using freesurfer v5.1
Derek Sayre Andrews, PhD
Postdoctoral Scholar
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
The M.I.N.D Institute
University of California Davis
Telephone: +1 916 703 0360
Email: dandrews@UCDavis.edu
_______________________________________________Freesurfer mailing listFreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer