Can you send a few examples?External Email - Use Caution
Hello list,
I noticed that I find the quality of the neocortical segmentation of vs 6 better than vs 7.1.1., but the subcortical segmentation of 7.1.1 better than vs 6.
I think it is ok, though you may run into some pushback from reviewers as it is non-standard.
Is it valid to do analyses of neocortical and subcortical areas based on different Freesurfer versions? Even when, say, correlating them to each other? Or, in line with this to use the hippocampal and amygdala subfields from vs 7.1.1 in combination with neocortex (eg thickness estimates) of vs 6?
Thank you!
Annelies
Annelies van't Westeinde | PHD Candidate
Department of Women's and Children's Health | Karolinska Institutet
171 77 Solna | Karolinskavägen 37A
+46 760967499
annelies.vant.westeinde@ki.se | ki.se
______________________________________
Karolinska Institutet – a medical university
När du skickar e-post till Karolinska Institutet (KI) innebär detta att KI kommer att behandla dina personuppgifter. Här finns information om hur KI behandlar personuppgifter.
Sending email to Karolinska Institutet (KI) will result in KI processing your personal data. You can read more about KI’s processing of personal data here.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer