Hi Bruce,

Is there a flag for this on recon-all?  Or do you need to use mri_make_surfaces directly?

Best,
Michael

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Joshua

yes, we already have upgraded mris_make_surfaces to take higher res data
and refine the surfaces with it. Haven't tried it on the aseg yet, but if
you upload a sample dataset I could see how hard it is.

cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 14 May 2012,
Joshua Lee wrote:

> Dear Freesurfers,
>
> Over the last years, MR imaging technology hasimproved such that sub 1-mm
> isotropic scans can be obtained with good signal to noise characteristics.
> For example, our lab uses 0.7mm isotropic structural MR images. I understand
> that the Freesurfer pipeline will up-sample these to 1mm isotropic, but it
> seems a shame that so much information is left unused which could be used to
> improve the accuracy of sub-cortical and cortical segmentation. My question
> is whether there are any plans at Freesurfer to change the reference
> standard resolution from 1mm isotropic, or provide another solution that can
> help researchers make the most of your technology.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Joshua
> -
> Joshua
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.