External Email - Use Caution
Hi,Thank you for your response. The images in the first figure represent the paramagnetic files (output from the Chi Separation algorithm). Thelh.whitesurface, registered using thetransformationvolume.datfile, has been overlaid on the paramagnetic volume (2nd Figure).Thanks,Shraddha
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2025 9:12 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] [External] Re: Assistance with mri_vol2surf: Missing Surface Values in Output
You don't often get email from dgreve@mgh.harvard.edu. Learn why this is important
What kind of image is that? FS will only work on T1-weighted. I'm surprised it did that good.
On 1/3/2025 2:12 PM, Pandey, Shraddha wrote:External Email - Use CautionHi,Thank you for your response. I suspect the gray regions might be problematic (incorrect) for the following reasons:
- When I overlay
lh.whiteon the original volume, I notice some misregistration (see the figure below).- To address this, I applied the
transformationvolume.datfile generated frombbregister, which I used to create the surface withmri_vol2surface.However, the transformedlh.whitesurface generated using thetransformationvolume.datfile appears to be incorrect—it seems to be rotated by 90 degrees (refer to the second figure below).I am unsure what I might be doing wrong. Could you please suggest what mistake I might be making?Thank you once again for your help.Shraddha
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Fischl, Bruce R.,PHD <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2024 9:33 AM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [External] Re: [Freesurfer] Assistance with mri_vol2surf: Missing Surface Values in OutputHi Shraddha
Why do you think the gray regions are a problem? They are just surface locations where the values mapped from the volume are below threshold. You can change the threshold if you bring up the overlay configuration window
cheers
Bruce
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Pandey, Shraddha
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2024 7:25 PM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Assistance with mri_vol2surf: Missing Surface Values in Output
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Free Surfer Experts,
I am currently working on generating a surface from a volume using the
mri_vol2surftool. The process I am following is as follows:
- I first create the registration file using
bbregisterwith the following command:bashbbregister --s "${sub}xx${ses}" --mov "$input_mri" --reg "$output_reg_file" --o "$output_vol_file" --init-header --t1
- Here, the goal is to generate the
.datregistration file.- Next, I use this
.datfile inmri_vol2surfto generate the surface with the following command:mri_vol2surf --mov "$input_volume" --reg "$output_reg_file" --hemi lh --projfrac 0.2 --o "$output_surface"
The input MRI for the
bbregistercommand is flash data, and the input volume formri_vol2surfis a paramagnetic volume that has been registered with the Flash data.However, the surface output generated by
mri_vol2surfcontains missing surface values (as shown in the figure below. For instance, the grey regions in the surface estimates).I would greatly appreciate any insights into why this might be occurring and how to resolve the issue.
Thank you for your time and assistance!
Regards,
Shraddha
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer