not really, it seems like there is a bug. If you can localize it to just one or a  few subjects it would a lot easier to track down

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Siddharth Srivastava wrote:

Hi Bruce,
           These are about 28 images. I have not tried fewer...do you
think there
are some images with incorrect orientation in the cohort? That would show up
in the other location in the average i think...
sid.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:

I don't think so. How many subjects? Have you tried fewer?

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Siddharth Srivastava wrote:

 The surfaces look all right. It happens only to T1. It cant be a display

problem, can it??
sid.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

wrote:

 that is strange. Do the surfaces look ok? How many subjects are you

averaging? Does this happen if you only average one or a few?

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Siddharth Srivastava wrote:

 Hi everyone,

               I am attaching a tiff file showing the tkmedit view of
the average
T1 that freesurfer created during make_average_subject. I am a bit
concerned

about the cropping that is evident at the posterior aspect of the brain.
The

individual T1's are complete and ok, so i am guessing that something
went
wrong during the transform of the individual brain during the process.
Can
anyone help me find out the problem ? The average surfaces also look all
right.
              thanks,
              sid.