If there was not an interaction between group and ICV, I would say to
use DOSS where demeaning does not make a difference. Since there is an
interaction, you have to use DODS, but the interpretation is no longer
easy. If you do not demean, then you are implictly testing for a
difference at ICV=0 (this is what "regressing out" means). If you
demean, you are implicitly testing at ICV=MeanICV. The problem is that
the results can change depending on the ICV you test it at.
On 08/29/2016 02:53 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
> Sorry for not specifying. Yes, we are looking at difference in volume
> between the two groups using DODS. What is the most statistically
> sound... raw values, demeaning across the entire sample, or demeaning
> with groups separately? FYI, I exported the ICV values to SAS and
> there is a significant different between the two groups for ICV.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Douglas N Greve
> <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> wrote:
>
> not sure what you are testing, but if you are, eg, looking at the
> difference between two groups regressing out ICV, then it can make a
> huge difference
>
>
> On 08/29/2016 12:36 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am wondering why results would change completely for between group
> > volume analysis when using demeaned/mean-centered ICV compared to
> > using ICV as a covariate in mri_glmfit? See the figures below.
> >
> > Does demeaning the covariate inherently change the results
> comapred to
> > the raw covariate values?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Corinna
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ > <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
harvard.edu >
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ >freesurfer
>
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 <tel:617-724-2358>
> Fax: 617-726-7422 <tel:617-726-7422>
>
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ >BugReporting
> FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
> <https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2 >
> www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
> <http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index. >html
> Outgoing:
> ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/ greve/
> <ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/ >greve/
>
> _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.
> Freesurfer mailing list
harvard.edu >
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ >freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
> whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
> the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline
> <http://www.partners.org/complianceline > . If the e-mail was sent
> to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/ greve/
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer