So I created a weighted regression analysis to look at the effect of memory load in a particular brain region. Basically, I weighted the paradigms by a behavioral measure that reflected the number of items actually remembered (as set size was increased).  As far as Doug told me there are basically 2 ways to weight your paradigm files.

Version 1:
Have 2 conditions, baseline (condition 0) and all the set sizes (condition 1).  Condition 1 would then be weighted by the behavioral measure.

Version 2:
Have 3 conditions, baseline (condition 0), and then I represented each presentation as two different conditions, one with a weight that is always 1 (condition 1), the other weighted according to the behavioral measure (condition 2).


The difference, as far as I understand it, in version 1, it is assumed that the response amplitude is ) when the weight is 0 (ie. that when you are attending to 0 items, brain activity = 0).  Whereas, version 2, tests the slope of the HRF amplitude vs weight without the assumption above.

However, I'm a bit confused as to the results I got.  When I looked at the data from both versions, version 1 provided a much higher amount of activation and more areas activated than version 2.  However, I believe version 2 better fits with the multiple regression analysis that is done in Brain Voyager. 

Can anyone give me a better explanation of what the difference between these analysis models is?

Katie