unsubscribe me

thanks.


From: "freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 8:09:19 AM
Subject: Freesurfer Digest, Vol 77, Issue 22

Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to
    freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    freesurfer-request@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
    freesurfer-owner@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Displaying significant difference with a threshold of
      cluster size (Douglas N Greve)
  2. Re: Displaying significant difference with a threshold    of
      cluster size (liang wang)
  3. Troubleshooting: Are these pial and wm surface    acceptable?
      (xuemei lei)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:42:39 -0400
From: Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Displaying significant difference with a
    threshold of    cluster size
To: liang wang <wanglbit@gmail.com>
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID: <4C3A028F.7070800@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

You should correct for multiple comparisons using cluster-wise
correction. See the tutorials on group analysis on our wiki.

doug

liang wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using mri_glmfit, I found significant between-group difference in
> cortical thickness in some regions. However, there are a lot regions
> with very small vertices surviving the given threshold. What I need to
> do is displaying large clusters (e.g. having 20 vertices at least)
> assumed as "true" difference. I don't know how to make it by a
> selected threshold of cluster size . Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>
> Liang
>
> --
> Liang Wang, PhD
> Postdoctoral Fellow
> Woodward Lab
> Department of Psychiatry
> University of British Columbia
> BC Mental Health & Addiction Services
> 938 West 28th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4
> Telephone: 1-604-875-2000 (ext. 4735)
> Fax: 1-604-875-3871
> Email: wanglbit@gmail.com <mailto:wanglbit@gmail.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:16:17 -0700
From: liang wang <wanglbit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Displaying significant difference with a
    threshold    of cluster size
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID:
    <AANLkTinU0knZdFiivSrtnnF4LuV_SlK5iH7eftriOV1-@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello Doug,

Thanks for your kind response. I have tried to use mri_glmfit-sim to correct
the results. However, no significant differences were observed. To compare
with other studies, I would like to report the results (p < 0.001,
uncorrected) and mention that they will disappear if corrected by
cluster-based threshold method. Is it a acceptable way?

Liang

2010/7/11 Douglas N Greve <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

> You should correct for multiple comparisons using cluster-wise correction.
> See the tutorials on group analysis on our wiki.
>
> doug
>
> liang wang wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Using mri_glmfit, I found significant between-group difference in cortical
>> thickness in some regions. However, there are a lot regions with very small
>> vertices surviving the given threshold. What I need to do is displaying
>> large clusters (e.g. having 20 vertices at least) assumed as "true"
>> difference. I don't know how to make it by a selected threshold of cluster
>> size . Any suggestions would be appreciated.
>>
>> Liang
>>
>> --
>> Liang Wang, PhD
>> Postdoctoral Fellow
>> Woodward Lab
>> Department of Psychiatry
>> University of British Columbia
>> BC Mental Health & Addiction Services
>> 938 West 28th Avenue
>> Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4
>> Telephone: 1-604-875-2000 (ext. 4735)
>> Fax: 1-604-875-3871
>> Email: wanglbit@gmail.com <mailto:wanglbit@gmail.com>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>
>


--
Liang Wang, PhD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Woodward Lab
Department of Psychiatry
University of British Columbia
BC Mental Health & Addiction Services
938 West 28th Avenue
Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4
Telephone: 1-604-875-2000 (ext. 4735)
Fax: 1-604-875-3871
Email: wanglbit@gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20100711/abba1269/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:09:16 +0800
From: xuemei lei <bnuxuemei@gmail.com>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Troubleshooting: Are these pial and wm surface
    acceptable?
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID:
    <AANLkTimaQMUKYwq4AXMY3obVmThd1Jrm5988xitKtd7r@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi All
  I  recently started with FreeSurfer, and I am not sure about  the pial
and wm surface in the subcortical regions( eg. Hippocampus and
amygdala,Medial temporal lobe). I have attatched the figures. Are these pial
and wm surfaces acceptable? I have no ideas about the criterion and the
right surface in this regions reconstracted by Freesurfer.
  Please let me know!
  thank you  very much!

--
Xuemei Lei
National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China. 100875
Tel: +86-13269171259
Email: bnuxuemei@gmail.com
Blog: www.dubo.in
Web: http://psychbrain.bnu.edu.cn
==============================================
Welcome to the Blog: www.dubo.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20100712/dae11918/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 188581 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20100712/dae11918/attachment.png

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

End of Freesurfer Digest, Vol 77, Issue 22
******************************************


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.