Hi Michelle

are you doing anything out of the ordinary? Do you want to send us a dataset and we will take a look? I don't think 6.0 is very different from 5.3 in regard to skull stripping, although it is probably a bit better

Bruce

On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Michelle VanTieghem wrote:

Hello, 
I have posted several times about problems with skull-stripping with our dataset. We have tried gcut
and multiple other options in other packages (AFNI, FSL, ANTS) to remove skull from structural
images in our dataset with little success.

Recently, a colleague suggested this may be due to versions: that 6.0 deals with skull stripping
much better than 5.3. 

 I wanted to ask if indeed this could be the case before I go install 6.0 and re-run everything in
my study.

Thank you, 
Michelle 

--
Michelle VanTieghem
PhD student in Psychology
Developmental Affective Neuroscience Lab
Columbia University 
mrv2115@columbia.edu

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.