Hi,<br><br>here&#39;s an email from Don Hagler from February 2009:<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">




<div>
It seems to me that vertex areas in the native subject space are not meaningful.  The orig surfaces should be uniformly tesselated; however, topology correction and final surface finding should introduce complicated and probably uninteresting variation.<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br>i couldn&#39;t find a direct reply to this remark, hence my question:<br>is this true? and if so, does this imply that native space surface measurements (as given in the aparc.stats file) are uninteresting for statistical analysis?<br>
<br>best,<br>-joost<br><br></div></div>