what is it that is noisy? The angle map or the p-value map? Can you send
pics?
doug

On 08/06/2012 12:41 PM, Thomas Janssens wrote:

Hi,

I am currently analyzing some retinotopy data.

For the polar angle stimulus we had both clockwise and counterclockwise stimuli.

Both of them started at the top of the screen (12 o'clock), each run includes 4 full cycles and ends with the last wedge slightly before/after 12o'clock.

We have created seperate paradigm files (direction pos /  direction neg) for the clockwise and counterclockwise runs and followed the steps as indicated by the "FsFastIndividualRetinotopyAnalysis".

However, when we run the Freesurfer retinotopy analysis on the whole data set, the polar angle is very noisy.

When we run the same analysis separately for the clockwise and counterclockwise runs separately, the results look much better.

Could anyone tell me what I am doing wrong?

Thanks!

Thomas

_______________________________________________

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer