Hello,
When running recon-all –qcache –s <subject> with a
view to running qdec analyses I get the following error message, which I think
I understand, however I am having trouble with the –make all option of
recon-all that is recommended in a previous thread:
“Reading curvature file /PICKACARDB01/surf/lh.jacobian_white
ERROR: number of vertices in
/PICKACARDB01/surf/lh.jacobian_white does not match surface (150934, 150818)
ERROR: reading curvature file
recon-all exited with ERRORS at Tue Dec 9 ...”
This subject was originally run on 4.0.1
(Linux-centos4_x86_64 version)
And then corrected and rerun on 4.0.3 (Linux-centos4_x86_64
version)
(I understand that this is not always a good thing to do
rerunning on a different version so don’t know if this has anything to do with
it..). I think I am correct in saying that they problem might be due to
rerunning portions of recon-all (in this case we reran from –autorecon2-wm to
correct a wm error) such that the new surface vertices do not match such that
the lh.jacobian_white file in this case is now invalid.
My query is as follows:
I have experimented with running “recon-all
–s <subject> -make all” to fix the above problem but it seems to be going
through the entirety of the recon-all processing stream... I thought it only
ran the parts that were missing, or in the case that dependency files are older
than a particular file. Have I misunderstood this flag, or is it running
through the whole of recon-all simply because we are running it on 4.0.3, so it
is updating all of the recon-all files up to autorecon2-wm that were created
from version 4.0.1?
It is interesting that the error happens in this case only
on the jacobian_white surface, in other subjects it has occurred for all smoothing
surface files on a single hemisphere (.e.g. volume, sulc, curv, thickness,
jacobian_white ..) and in many just the .volume files are missing... it is
confusing.
Naturally I would love to avoid reprocessing these subjects
from scratch! But I can see how this might not be possible.
Thanks very much for your time,
Rysia