I check the recon-all.log. It appears that the cortical region for caudalanteriorcongulate for this subject is very small.. 

table columns are:
     number of vertices
     total surface area (mm^2)
     total gray matter volume (mm^3)
     average cortical thickness +- standard deviation (mm)
     integrated rectified mean curvature
     integrated rectified Gaussian curvature
     folding index
     intrinsic curvature index
     structure name

597    390    747  1.952 0.684     0.137     0.104      395     2.7  bankssts
29     18     42  2.705 0.791     0.131     0.040        0     0.1  caudalanteriorcingulate

Daniel

-- 
Yung-Jui "Daniel" Yang, PhD
Postdoctoral Researcher
Yale Child Study Center
New Haven, CT
(203) 737-5454

On 8/5/13 5:52 PM, "Douglas Greve" <greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

That is a little strange. Can you look at the wmparc.mgz to see if it is there? Also look at the aparc+aseg.mgz to see how big the cortical region for caudalanteriorcingulate is. The wmparc is based on the aparc part of aparc+aseg.
doug




On 8/5/13 12:49 PM, Yang, Daniel wrote:
Dear FreeSurfer Experts,

I'm looking at stats/wmparc.stats, and there are some inconsistencies between subjects. I am wondering what might be the cause.

For one subject (say subject 1), part of the information appears to be:

# NRows 66 
# NTableCols 10 
# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName normMean normStdDev normMin normMax normRange  
  1 3001      1869     1869.0  wm-lh-bankssts                   101.6999     9.1445    69.0000   127.0000    58.0000 
  2 3003      1776     1776.0  wm-lh-caudalmiddlefrontal         98.1676     8.5074    75.0000   125.0000    50.0000 
  3 3005       710      710.0  wm-lh-cuneus                     103.7088    10.1493    78.0000   134.0000    56.0000 
  4 3006       106      106.0  wm-lh-entorhinal                  84.5902     9.0358    55.0000    96.0000    41.0000 

For the other subject (subject 2), it appears to be:

# NRows 70 
# NTableCols 10 
# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName normMean normStdDev normMin normMax normRange  
  1 3001      1012     1012.0  wm-lh-bankssts                    93.6101    10.0971    71.0000   130.0000    59.0000 
  2 3002      1732     1732.0  wm-lh-caudalanteriorcingulate    104.3373    10.6871    58.0000   126.0000    68.0000 
  3 3003      4743     4743.0  wm-lh-caudalmiddlefrontal         95.2809    11.5139    66.0000   117.0000    51.0000 
  4 3005      1488     1488.0  wm-lh-cuneus                      91.9310    10.1995    64.0000   126.0000    62.0000 
  5 3006       398      398.0  wm-lh-entorhinal                  75.3343     9.0664    55.0000   101.0000    46.0000 

Thus, in subject 1, there is no estimate for 3002, wm-lh-caudalanteriorcingulate, and the NRows is different.

Could you please help? Both are analyzed by FreeSurfer 5.1.0.

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
Yung-Jui "Daniel" Yang, PhD
Postdoctoral Researcher
Yale Child Study Center
New Haven, CT
(203) 737-5454


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer