Hi Bruce,

Thanks for your answer.
What do you think would be better, run recon-all on the original data (with lesions) then edit the aseg for the juxtacortical lesions or use a lesion filling on the T1 and then run recon-all on it.
Thanks again.

Cheers,

Ismail

PhD candidate
Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
Bordeaux, France

2016-12-09 22:58 GMT+01:00 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
I Ismail

yes, if you have juxtacortical lesions you should label them as such in
the aseg, then I think it should work

cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, Ismail Koubiyr
wrote:

> Dear Freesurfer experts,
> We are facing a problem in our study and would need your advice on it.
> We want to get an accurate measurement for the cortical thickness from our
> MS patients data. For that we are using 3D T1 and FLAIR (recon-all will be
> used with the FLAIR option so that we can a more accurate pial surface).
> However, we were wondering if running recon-all on the raw data would lead
> to some errors specially because of the juxtacortical lesions or not. Or, is
> it better to first apply a lesion filling using our lesion mask ?
> I should specify that we will use the longitudinal pipeline if it is of any
> use.
>
> Thank you all.
>
> Ismail
>
> PhD candidate
> Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM
> Bordeaux, France
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.