I would definitely rerun, for the sake of reproducibility. The results are sensitive not only to changes in the subfield module (which I believe I didn’t modify in between your release and the final 6.0), but also to changes in the main FreeSurfer stream. So, your results are different than what you’d get by rerunning everything with the final 6.0 version.

/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias

ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/

On 7 Feb 2017, at 20:18, Smagula, Stephen Fearns <sfs26@pitt.edu> wrote:

Dear Dr. Iglesias,

Using the originally released version 6 (the one that was "unreleased") I ran the recon -all -all and the subfield segmentations on a sample. I noticed that the program was taken down then put back online after some updates.

Do you recommend we re-run these segmentations with the newly released version? That is, if the segmentation ran with the "old FreeSurfer 6", would you expect there to be any difference with the new release?

Thank you,

Stephen Smagula

Post-doc

University of Pittsburgh

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.