Hello FreeSurfer experts,

 

I am using a mass-univariate pipeline to assess cortical thickness changes longitudinally at a regional level (based on the D-K atlas), and have been following this thread: MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg76987.html.

 

My pipeline is set up so that lme_mass_fit, lme_mass_F, and lme_mass_FDR are all run independently in a for-loop for each individual ROI, rather than altogether. Is this correct? As well, would using FDR2 be more advantageous than FDR?

 

 

Best,

Daniel Bondi