Hello Doug,
Thanks for your kind response. I have tried to use mri_glmfit-sim to correct the results. However, no significant differences were observed. To compare with other studies, I would like to report the results (p < 0.001, uncorrected) and mention that they will disappear if corrected by cluster-based threshold method. Is it a acceptable way?
Liang
You should correct for multiple comparisons using cluster-wise correction. See the tutorials on group analysis on our wiki.
doug
liang wang wrote:
Email: wanglbit@gmail.com <mailto:wanglbit@gmail.com>Hi,
Using mri_glmfit, I found significant between-group difference in cortical thickness in some regions. However, there are a lot regions with very small vertices surviving the given threshold. What I need to do is displaying large clusters (e.g. having 20 vertices at least) assumed as "true" difference. I don't know how to make it by a selected threshold of cluster size . Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Liang
--
Liang Wang, PhD
Postdoctoral Fellow
Woodward Lab
Department of Psychiatry
University of British Columbia
BC Mental Health & Addiction Services
938 West 28th Avenue
Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4
Telephone: 1-604-875-2000 (ext. 4735)
Fax: 1-604-875-3871
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
greve@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html