Hi Nick,
After trying all of the steps below, the surfaces are much improved, but
the pial surface still has problems, particularly in the temporal lobes
(see below). So, maybe this is the best we can do with this
image. Thank you for helping out with this.
Thanks,
Dana
At 06:58 PM 10/5/2009, Nick Schmansky wrote:
Dana,
First I would run:
recon-all -s subid -clean
to remove any prior control points and edits.
Then I would open nu.mgz:
tkmedit subjid nu.mgz
and *sparingly* put control points well into white matter areas on a
few
different slices. you only need a half dozen or so. to add
control
points, see:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/ControlPoints
except you will add them to nu.mgz, to make sure that T1.mgz gets
created properly.
Then create a file name xopts.txt containing these lines:
mri_normalize -gentle
Then run:
recon-all -s subjid -autorecon1 -expert
<path_to>/xopts.txt
and when done, open brainmask.mgz
tkmedit subjid brainmask.mgz
and check again to get a sense of the low value for white matter and
high value for gray matter, then run:
recon-all -s subjid -autorecon2 -seg-wlo wlo -seg-ghi ghi
replacing wlo and ghi with those values.
if the surfaces still look bad, you can add a line to the xopts.txt
file :
mris_make_surfaces -max_gray val -min_gray_at_white_border val
replacing the two 'val's with something you find appropriate, then
run:
recon-all -s subjid -autorecon2-pial -autorecon3 \
-expert <path_to>/xopts.txt
good luck!
Nick
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:56 -0400, Dana W. Moore wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Below is Bruce's response to a problem I'm having with the
gray/white
> segmentation. (Pasted below, you can see the brainmask.mgz volume
and
> surfaces--the entire brain is labeled as white matter). I
could use
> some guidance in carrying out his advice. He says to adjust
the
> intensity normalization using control points and then use expert
opts
> for mri_segment and mris_make_surfaces.
>
> When I look at the brain.mgz volume, the white matter tends to have
an
> intensity of 110, as it should, but the gray matter at times goes
as
> high as 115. I was thinking, I could set ghi to 115 and wlo to
110.
> Then, I am not sure how to actually run the corrections and
what
> language to use to implement the control points and mri_segment
> adjustments. I will save control points and then run:
recon-all
> -autorecon2-cp -autorecon3 -subjed <subject>. Can I
somehow include
> the mri_segment adjustments into this command, or do I have to
run
> that separately?
>
> I am also not sure how options for mris_make_surfaces might
help.
>
> I appreciate your help with this!
>
> Thanks,
> dana
>
>
>
>
> []
>
> At 04:40 PM 10/2/2009, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> > Hi Dana,
> >
> > it looks like the gray/white density estimation failed. Try
setting
> > them with the expert opts for mri_segment and
mris_make_surfaces
> > (Nick can point you in the right direction if you can't figure
it
> > out). Things like max gm at white border and such.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Bruce
>
>
> p.s. it also looks like the intensity normalization went too far
due
> to the low contrast. You'll probably need to add some control
points
> and run it with the -gentle option
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Dana W. Moore wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I am trying to salvage some images that were done with
poor
> > > gray/white boundary contrasts. First, FreeSurfer includes
an area
> > > of dura in the skull strip. I tried adjusting the
watershed but
> > > it made no differences. FreeSurfer is subsequently unable
to
> > > detect the gray/white boundary and labels the dura as
cortex:
> > >
> > > []
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking at the raw images, the gray/white boundaries are
faint but
> > > visible. Is there anything I can adjust to try to make
this work
> > > with FreeSurfer?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dana
> > >
> > >
> > > Dana W. Moore, Ph.D.
> > > Neuropsychology Fellow
> > > Cornell Neuropsychology Service
> > > Weill Medical College of Cornell University
> > > New York Presbyterian Hospital
> > > Department of Neurology & Neuroscience
> > > 428 East 72nd Street, Suite 500
> > > New York, NY 10021
> > > Phone: 212-746-2823
> > > Fax: 212-746-5584
> > > Email: dwm2003@med.cornell.edu
>
> Dana W. Moore, Ph.D.
> Neuropsychology Fellow
> Cornell Neuropsychology Service
> Weill Medical College of Cornell University
> New York Presbyterian Hospital
> Department of Neurology & Neuroscience
> 428 East 72nd Street, Suite 500
> New York, NY 10021
> Phone: 212-746-2823
> Fax: 212-746-5584
> Email: dwm2003@med.cornell.edu
>
>
Dana W. Moore, Ph.D.
Neuropsychology Fellow
Cornell Neuropsychology Service
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Department of Neurology & Neuroscience
428 East 72nd Street, Suite 500
New York, NY 10021
Phone: 212-746-2823
Fax: 212-746-5584
Email: dwm2003@med.cornell.edu