Hi Annie,
I have previously extracted individual regions from the 7 and 17
networks. You can download them here
(https://www.dropbox.com/s/u23nn3ov18tlhfs/Yeo_ ).JNeurophysiol11_SplitLabels. zip?dl=0
Please see the README in the folder for more explanations. There
should be a precuneus DMN region.
The 17 networks consist of 114 regions that have been previously published:
1) Krienen et al., Reconfigurable state-dependent functional coupling
modes cluster around a core functional architecture. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369:20130526, 2014
2) Yeo et al., Functional connectivity during rested wakefulness
predicts vulnerability to sleep deprivation. Neuroimage 111:147-158,
2015
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Thomas
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:08 PM, 陳昱潔 <poohann1122@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Dr. Yeo,
>
> Thank you for your previous help and reply. We've worked out the way to
> switch the resolution of parcellation and successfully extracted the
> anatomical information using your mask derived from iFC work.
>
> However, we came across a new problem to apply the cortical mask and need
> your kind help again. We aim to conduct a seed-based analysis to investigate
> structural covariance based on the network defined by iFC, and find your
> work of cortical parcellation conceptually perfectly suit our research
> question. Based on the current approach, however, it seemed that we could
> only extract the anatomical information from the whole well-defined network,
> but not the specific hub within the network (e.g., the anatomical
> information of the precuneus from the DMN). We wonder if you have any
> suggestion to resolve our problem, ie, to be specific, is there any way to
> only extract the discrete hub information rather than the whole network?
>
> We really appreciate your generous help. Thank you very much.
>
> p.s. This email would also forward to my senior colleague, Dr. Hsiang-Yuan
> Lin, who is a child and adolescent psychiatrist doing imaging research in
> Taiwan.
>
>
> 2015-05-13 19:15 GMT+08:00 陳昱潔 <poohann1122@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Professor Yeo :
>>
>> Thank you for helping us so much!
>> After mris_anatomical_stat I tried aparcstats2table to extract the table.
>> But I failed with generating the table.
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Annie
>>
>> 2015-05-12 8:29 GMT-04:00 Thomas Yeo <ythomas@csail.mit.edu>:
>>
>>> Hi Annie,
>>>
>>> I assume this means 5202 is your subject ID? Maybe you should check if
>>> /home/annie/test_run_allindex/5202/label/lh.Yeo2011_ 7Networks_N1000.annot
>>> exist?
>>>
>>> If so, you can run mris_anatomical_stats to generate statistics for
>>> the parcellation.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:29 PM, 陳昱潔 <poohann1122@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Professor Yeo :
>>> > After I rechecked the directory and run again mri_surf2surf
>>> > I got the result:
>>> > "Saving target data
>>> > Converting to target annot
>>> > Saving to target annot
>>> >
>>> > /home/annie/test_run_allindex/5202/label/lh.Yeo2011_ 7Networks_N1000.annot"
>>> > The file of 5202/label didn't come out with
>>> > lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
>>> > But it seems succeed, right?
>>> > How can I get the stat of this parcellation ?
>>> >
>>> > Thank you very much!
>>> >
>>> > Best wishes,
>>> > Annie
>>> >
>>> > 2015-05-12 6:06 GMT-04:00 Thomas Yeo <ythomas@csail.mit.edu>:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Annie,
>>> >>
>>> >> mri_surf2surf is complaining that it cannot write out the annotation.
>>> >>
>>> >> Just to clarify, is your subject called test_run_allindex? In other
>>> >> words, is the variable s equal to test_run_allindex?
>>> >>
>>> >> Does the directory "/home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/" exist? If
>>> >> not, then you first need to create the directory first, and then
>>> >> mri_surf2surf can write the resulting annotation file into the
>>> >> directory.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Thomas
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:46 PM, 陳昱潔 <poohann1122@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi Professor Yeo :
>>> >> >
>>> >> > We tried the code
>>> >> >>> mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject $s --hemi lh
>>> >> >>> --sval-annot
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> $FREESURFER_HOME/subjects/fsaverage/label/lh.Yeo2011_ 7Networks_N1000.annot
>>> >> >>> --tval $SUBJECTS_DIR/$s/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
>>> >> > However there came an error of "could not write annot file
>>> >> > /home/annie/test_run_allindex/label/lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_ N1000.annot
>>> >> > No such file or directory"
>>> >> > And we checked our individual subject's label there isn't
>>> >> > lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot
>>> >> > Should we generate/import the lh.Yeo2011_7Networks_N1000.annot into
>>> >> > our
>>> >> > subjects/label first?
>>> >> > What can we do ?
>>> >> > Thank you very much!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best wishes,
>>> >> > Annie
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2015-05-05 8:36 GMT-04:00 Thomas Yeo <ythomas@csail.mit.edu>:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Hi Annie,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Please cc the freesurfer list when you reply because there might be
>>> >> >> other people more qualified to answer your question.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Based on what you are saying, I think you can first use
>>> >> >> mri_surf2surf
>>> >> >> (with the "sval-annot" flag) to transform the 2011 functional
>>> >> >> networks
>>> >> >> .annot file from fsaverage space to the subject's native surface
>>> >> >> space. Type "mri_surf2surf --help" to see examples.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> You can then use mris_anatomical_stats to compute thickness
>>> >> >> statistics.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Cheers,
>>> >> >> Thomas
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:21 PM, 陳昱潔 <poohann1122@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Dear Pro. Yeo:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Very appreciate for your reply !
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > We are trying to use your definition of the functional network
>>> >> >> > regions
>>> >> >> > to
>>> >> >> > re-parcellate our images
>>> >> >> > and get the regions of volume or cortical thickness for our study
>>> >> >> > interest
>>> >> >> > of structural network.
>>> >> >> > However, we did not want to re-run the first recon-all again due
>>> >> >> > to
>>> >> >> > it's
>>> >> >> > spending to much time.
>>> >> >> > And we are still can't find the way to solve this problem.
>>> >> >> > Thank you very much for helping us!
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Best wishes,
>>> >> >> > Annie Chen
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > 2015-05-02 8:25 GMT+08:00 Thomas Yeo <ythomas@csail.mit.edu>:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Hi Yu-Chieh,
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> I am cc-ing the freesurfer list who may help you with your
>>> >> >> >> issues.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Can you explain what exactly you are trying do? The parcellation
>>> >> >> >> is
>>> >> >> >> released in different resolutions including fsaverage5. Why
>>> >> >> >> can't
>>> >> >> >> you
>>> >> >> >> just use the fsaverage5 parcellation?
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Cheers,
>>> >> >> >> Thomas
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:14 PM, 陳昱潔 <poohann1122@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> > Dear professor Yeo :
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > My name is Yu-chieh Chen , I am a graduated student from
>>> >> >> >> > National
>>> >> >> >> > Taiwan
>>> >> >> >> > University of medical school, and my supervisor is professor
>>> >> >> >> > Susan
>>> >> >> >> > Shur-Fen
>>> >> >> >> > Gau from department of psychiatry, National Taiwan University
>>> >> >> >> > Hospital &
>>> >> >> >> > College of Medicine. We are very interesting about your paper
>>> >> >> >> > published
>>> >> >> >> > in
>>> >> >> >> > 2011 which using resting MRI to separate brain regions to
>>> >> >> >> > functional
>>> >> >> >> > networks. We'd like to use your percellation to re-separate
>>> >> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> >> > brain
>>> >> >> >> > regions based on your released data in Freesurfer(
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > http://ftp.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ ).CorticalParcellation_Yeo2011
>>> >> >> >> > And
>>> >> >> >> > use
>>> >> >> >> > these volume of brain regions for our study, however, there
>>> >> >> >> > comes
>>> >> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> >> > problem that we assumed that we can change the fsaverage into
>>> >> >> >> > fsaverage5,
>>> >> >> >> > thus we may get the new volume of the parcellation_Yeo. But it
>>> >> >> >> > is
>>> >> >> >> > not
>>> >> >> >> > work.
>>> >> >> >> > So I send this email for help. Last , I am very appreciate
>>> >> >> >> > your
>>> >> >> >> > kindness
>>> >> >> >> > and
>>> >> >> >> > very sorry for my inappropriate and rough.
>>> >> >> >> > Thank you very much for read this email and sorry for occupied
>>> >> >> >> > your
>>> >> >> >> > time.
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Best wishes,
>>> >> >> >> > Yu-chieh Chen
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/ freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.