yes, definitely for cortical surfaces
Bruce

On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Watson, Christopher wrote:

I don't know, but I'm pretty sure the Freesurfer team will recommend you use v5.3.0. There are emails saying as much.
Chris
________________________________________
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of clarissa yasuda [clayasuda@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:54 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: [Freesurfer] different results between 5.1.0 and 5.2.0

Dear FreeSurfer Experts

As in some other posts, I have also observed some differences between the two releases.  The values from cuneus (thickness) are similar to the post from Ritobrato Datta, Ph.D. on 18 march.

But I also observed some differences in volume of right / left thalami. Did anybody observe such asymmetry??
I am now running analysis with patients and controls on data from 5.2.0 and got surprised with this asymmetry.

Here I am showing the average I obtained:

       R PALLIDUM      L PALLIDUM       R THAL L THAL          RH_CUNEUS       LH_CUNEUS
5.1 (350 SUBJECTS)      1580    1688     6701   6970.31         1.845   1.857

5.2 (115 SUBJECTS, subgroup of 350)     1519    1367                    6520    7401            2.42    2.40

Is there any approach to correct it on 5.2 ??
Thanks in advance
clarissa

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.