Hi Bruce, just checking in to see if you have had an opportunity to take a look at the data I sent over?

Thanks

Corinna

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Corinna Bauer <corinnab83@gmail.com> wrote:

Sure. I'm uploading now. The above is approximately slice 75, although the control points/wm surface problem is seen throughout in this subject.

Thanks

Corinna

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Hi Corinna

it's hard to tell what's going on from a single slice. If you upload the subject and tell us the specific coordinates that you see problems in we will take a look

cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Corinna Bauer wrote:

Hello all,We are analyzing data from our collaborators and are running into
some difficulties with the accuracy of the pial and wm boundaries. The
wm.mgz appears to follow the actual WM, independent of the wm surface
boundary. Attached is an example showing two types of problems.
1. the WM surface is inaccurate regardless of the number of control points
used.
2. The pial surface is inaccurate, missing a bunch of the sulcal and gyral
patterns of the left parietal lobe (see area around cursor).

For completeness, I have also included the wm.mgz at the same slice. 

I should mention that these problems has been occurring in multiple
subjects.

Any suggestions??

Thanks

Corinna

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.