Do you know when the next version is slated to launch?  That being said, if I wanted to salvage my work so far, is it best to just use the original "subcortical" output as is (if I was not trying to change it in the first place?).

-Mark Fletcher

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Hi Mark

it's hard to say if it's a "bug", but it is definitely a change in
behavior that will go away with 5.2 (that is, we will no longer
regenerate the aseg when you add control points).

cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mark
Fletcher wrote:

> Dear FreeSurfers,
>
> After adding WMCP to a number of my subjects (which corrected the problem),
> I retrieved to cortical and subcortical volumes from my subjects using the
> "aparcstats2table". I had used "aparcstats2table" before and after adding
> the control points.  Accurately, the regions I wanted to change, did change
> in volume.  However, the subcortical volumes post WMCP changed a lot as
> well?   Some regions changed more than 20% after adding WMCP to other
> regions?  Is this normal?  Should I go with the original "subcortical"
> segmentation volumes, or the new ones?   Is this part of the known bug in
> version 5.1.0 mentioned in the release notes about "running recon-all" a
> second time?  Please advise?
>
> Sincerely ,
> Mark Fletcher
>
>


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.