Dear,
I am not sure if the questions below were sent correctly to you, since I did not receive any copy of it.
Please find my message below.
Many thanks, looking forward to your reply.
Kind regards,
Nathalie Mertens
Van: Nathalie Mertens <nathalie.mertens@kuleuven.be>
Datum: dinsdag 18 augustus 2020 om 09:33
Aan: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Onderwerp: RBV PVC
Dear,
I do have some questions linked to RBV PVC implemented in Freesurfer:
- Could you please tell me how the RBV PVC is acquired? Is the RBV PVC acquired based on Muller-Gartner (on a region-level, and based on only
using gray- versus white matter), or when and how are the different regions from gtm_seg applied to obtain GTM?
- What would be the advantage of using your technique compared to for instance sGTM?
- Could you please tell me the difference in region-definition between aparc+aseg and the gtm_seg? (I saw that the latter contains less regions
compared to aparc+aseg.) What is the reason to use the latter compared to the aparc+aseg, based on the definitions of the regions? (I know that gtm_seg is used which has a high resolution, but not quite sure, apart from the resolution, why you are not using
aparc+aseg for the RBV PVC.)
- Is there a mask applied to the gtm_seg to exclude regions that are located outside the brain?
Many thanks for your answers.
Kind regards,
Nathalie