Hi Bruce,
I run FS 5.1. 
So for 5.1 version is it  normal that post editing aseg values ar different from pre editing even using autorecon2-cp?
Thanks again
Claudia


2013/7/24 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
I think it is, but I would visually inspect them. What FS version are you running? Earlier versions reran the aseg for autorecon2-cp, but 5.3 does not

n Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

Thanks Bruce,but I'm sure I ran autorecon2-cp autorecon3:


recon-all -autorecon2-cp -autorecon3 -subjid.

However, is it ok to use aseg values post editing even if they look different from the pre editing
ones?

Thanks a lot.

Claudia



2013/7/24 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
      Hi Claudia

      if you run autorecon2 you will rerun the aseg, which will use the control points to change
      the subcortical intensity normalization. If you don't want that to happen, you need to run
      -autorecon2-cp

      cheers
      Bruce


      On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

            Dear Freesurfers,we recently processed a sample of adult patients and then we
            reran autorecon-2 and
            autorecon-3 after editing contol points, white matter and pial surface.
            We exported the asegstat table both pre and post editing, and we got different
            volumes for most of the
            subjects.
            How is that possible, given that the kind of editing we performed is not
            supposed to affect subcortical
            segmentation?
            Thanks a lot.
            Claudia




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.