Hi Bruce,

I don't think it is.. It would of course be impossible to establish a 1:1 correspondence between regions, given that the H.-Oxf. is based on volumetric labeling of folding patterns.

Assuming there is no quantitative correspondence/transformation, if one were to still want to establish a correspondence between regions of the two atlaes, would one be only left with doing this manually/by eyeballing, e.g. by doing a volumetric projection of the DKT (if that is even possible) and viewing that superimposed on the H._Oxf?

Cheers

Tudor

On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 16:42, Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

Hi Tudor

sorry, I don't think there is a direct correspondence. Is the Oxford
atlas even on the surface?

cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Tudor Popescu wrote:

>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I have a network of interest described in terms of regions from the Harvard-Oxford atlas. I would
> next need to describe this network in terms of regions from the DKT (Desikan–Killiany–Tourville)
> atlas.
>
> I have not found hints of any correspondence table or script among the files in the
> dataverse.harvard.edu repository, nor in the Klein&Tourville 2012 paper. How is this sort of
> correspondence best established, in a way that also quantifies the transformation's accuracy (amount
> of overlap) for each parcelated region? Many thanks!
>
> Best wishes,
> Tudor
>
>_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer