It is hard to tell from those images, but the registration does not look that bad. It would be more informative to have images that are not on the midline.

On 6/27/2019 4:09 PM, Nasiriavanaki, Zahra wrote:

Dear Freesurfers

Hi

I checked the functional to anatomical data registration using tkregister-sess -s $subj -fsd bold -per-run -bbr-sum. (The functional data is only collected from parietal and occipital lobes in 7T scanner).

The values obtained from tkregister-sess are too high (0.95) for 7 out of 8 runs.

When I looked at the snapshots obtained from QA_tools, they looked ok (top row images). But, when I looked at the volumes of the individual runs using tkregister2 command, the registration doesn't look good (bottom row images).

tkregister2 --s $subj --mov /$subj/bold/011/template.nii.gz --surf --reg new.dat --regheader .

I'm wondering if I need to do manual edits, and I appreciate any advice on that.

Thanks

Mona

Zahra (Mona) Nasiriavanaki

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

Massachusetts General Hospital

149 13th Street, 149-2615

Charlestown, MA, USA, 02129
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer