Dear member of the list,
I've compared the output of mri_compute_seg_overlap (FS 5.1.0 and 5.3.0) against an home-made script to calculate the DICE coefficients between two asg.mgz files.
The results ranges from being perfectly equal (e.g. label 58) up to an error at the second decimal place (e.g. label 42), which is not acceptable.
Where do you think is the origin of these inconsistencies?