External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Bruce, 
In that paper, you reported that MP2RAGE underestimates cortical thickness relative to MEMPRAGE and also has slightly lower reproducibility. 
Since Recon-all does not seem to have built in functionality to deal with the background noise in MP2RAGE, I am wondering whether you still recommend MEMPRAGE over MP2RAGE. I only have regular MPRAGE for comparison at the moment. Thank you, 
Caspar 

On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 19:56 Fischl, Bruce <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
















Hi Caspar



 



Can you elaborate? What are the issues?



Bruce



 



From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

On Behalf Of Caspar M. Schwiedrzik


Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 2:27 AM


To: Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu


Subject: [Freesurfer] MEMPRAGE vs. MP2RAGE



 



        External Email - Use Caution        







Hi!







I was wondering whether the issues with surface reconstruction from MP2RAGE data that were reported for Freesurfer v5.1 in Fujimoto et al., 2014 still persist in more recent releases of Freesurfer, and whether there is information to what

extent they apply to 3T data?







Thank you!







Caspar







 













_______________________________________________

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu_mailman_listinfo_freesurfer&d=DwICAg&c=JeTkUgVztGMmhKYjxsy2rfoWYibK1YmxXez1G3oNStg&r=sgvCAzCi3iTXkTNRRVMpDnC6tu0lnijYpKXIX_UNme8&m=xQ8Cowc6OmPjU8ym3EVysBmtoEVDE6H47AkCObdzVy8&s=cUIYIUPYlPPYzq9yUoARG1sjLpuraBvjMrsd31fx1g8&e=