Wed Jan 11 10:58:28 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/bin/recon-all -all -subjid subject_1010 -expert /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts/expert.opts subjid subject_1010 setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects FREESURFER_HOME /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer Actual FREESURFER_HOME /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer build-stamp.txt: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.1.0 Linux clare-OptiPlex-990 2.6.35-31-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 28 19:29:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux cputime unlimited filesize unlimited datasize unlimited stacksize 8192 kbytes coredumpsize 0 kbytes memoryuse unlimited vmemoryuse unlimited descriptors 1024 memorylocked 64 kbytes maxproc unlimited total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 16422716 12909604 3513112 0 234696 10972640 -/+ buffers/cache: 1702268 14720448 Swap: 19795964 165920 19630044 ######################################## program versions used $Id: recon-all,v 1.379.2.17 2011/05/20 22:48:18 nicks Exp $ $Id: mri_motion_correct.fsl,v 1.14 2011/03/02 20:16:39 nicks Exp $ mri_convert -all-info ProgramName: mri_convert ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:28-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 FLIRT version 5.5 $Id: talairach_avi,v 1.9 2011/03/02 18:38:06 nicks Exp $ mri_convert --version stable5 ProgramName: tkregister2_cmdl ProgramArguments: --all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:28-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: tkregister2.c,v 1.121.2.1 2011/03/28 20:25:16 greve Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 Program nu_correct, built from: Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@minerva (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) on 2010-02-20 at 17:32:37 ProgramName: mri_make_uchar ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_make_uchar.c,v 1.4 2011/03/02 00:04:14 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_normalize.c,v 1.73 2011/03/11 20:55:38 fischl Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_watershed ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_watershed.cpp,v 1.96 2011/03/16 21:23:49 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_gcut ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_gcut.cpp,v 1.14 2011/03/02 00:04:16 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_segment ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_segment.c,v 1.40 2011/03/02 00:04:24 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_label2label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_label2label.c,v 1.40.2.1 2011/05/19 17:21:56 greve Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_em_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_em_register.c,v 1.84 2011/03/16 21:23:48 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_ca_normalize ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_ca_normalize.c,v 1.52 2011/03/02 00:04:14 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_ca_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:29-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_ca_register.c,v 1.78 2011/03/02 14:27:40 fischl Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_ca_label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_ca_label.c,v 1.96 2011/03/02 00:04:13 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_pretess ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_pretess.c,v 1.20 2011/03/02 00:04:23 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_fill ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_fill.c,v 1.118 2011/03/16 21:23:49 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_tessellate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.36 2011/03/02 00:04:25 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_concatenate_lta ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_concatenate_lta.c,v 1.10 2011/03/16 21:23:48 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_normalize_tp2 ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_normalize_tp2.c,v 1.8 2011/03/02 00:04:23 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_smooth ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_smooth.c,v 1.28 2011/03/02 00:04:34 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_inflate ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_inflate.c,v 1.43 2011/03/02 00:04:32 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_curvature ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:30-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_curvature.c,v 1.31 2011/03/02 00:04:30 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_sphere ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.57 2011/03/02 00:04:34 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_fix_topology ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.48 2011/03/02 00:04:32 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_topo_fixer ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_topo_fixer.cpp,v 1.29 2011/03/02 00:04:34 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_ca_label ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_ca_label.c,v 1.35 2011/03/02 00:04:27 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_euler_number ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_euler_number.c,v 1.8 2011/03/02 00:04:32 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_make_surfaces ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_make_surfaces.c,v 1.127 2011/03/02 00:04:33 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_register.c,v 1.59 2011/03/02 00:04:33 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_volmask ProgramArguments: --all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_volmask.cpp,v 1.25 2011/03/02 00:04:34 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_anatomical_stats ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:31-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_anatomical_stats.c,v 1.72 2011/03/02 00:04:26 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mrisp_paint ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mrisp_paint.c,v 1.11 2011/03/02 00:04:35 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_curvature_stats ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_curvature_stats.c,v 1.64 2011/03/02 00:04:30 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mris_calc ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mris_calc.c,v 1.37.2.4 2011/04/04 00:53:08 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 $Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.52 2011/03/16 21:23:49 nicks Exp $ ProgramName: mri_robust_register ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.52 2011/03/16 21:23:49 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 $Id: mri_robust_template.cpp,v 1.37 2011/03/02 00:04:24 nicks Exp $ ProgramName: mri_robust_template ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_robust_template.cpp,v 1.37 2011/03/02 00:04:24 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_and ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_and.c,v 1.4 2011/03/02 00:04:13 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_or ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_or.c,v 1.3 2011/03/02 00:04:13 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_fuse_segmentations ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_fuse_segmentations.c,v 1.8 2011/03/02 00:04:15 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ProgramName: mri_segstats ProgramArguments: -all-info ProgramVersion: $Name: stable5 $ TimeStamp: 2012/01/11-10:58:32-GMT BuildTimeStamp: May 22 2011 08:23:31 CVS: $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.75.2.2 2011/04/27 22:18:58 nicks Exp $ User: clare Machine: clare-OptiPlex-990 Platform: Linux PlatformVersion: 2.6.35-31-generic CompilerName: GCC CompilerVersion: 30400 ####################################### GCADIR /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average GCA RB_all_2008-03-26.gca GCASkull RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca AvgCurvTif average.curvature.filled.buckner40.tif GCSDIR /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average GCS curvature.buckner40.filled.desikan_killiany.2010-03-25.gcs ####################################### #-------------------------------------------- #@# MotionCor Wed Jan 11 10:58:32 GMT 2012 Found 1 runs /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig/001.mgz Checking for (invalid) multi-frame inputs... WARNING: only one run found. This is OK, but motion correction cannot be performed on one run, so I'll copy the run to rawavg and continue. cp /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig/001.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/rawavg.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010 mri_convert /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/rawavg.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig.mgz --conform mri_convert /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/rawavg.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig.mgz --conform $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $ reading from /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/rawavg.mgz... TR=11.00, TE=4.94, TI=-1.00, flip angle=15.00 i_ras = (-0, -1, 0) j_ras = (-0, -0, -1) k_ras = (-1, -0, 0) Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (232, 256, 176) voxels. Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 256 voxels for all directions changing data type from short to uchar (noscale = 0)... MRIchangeType: Building histogram Reslicing using trilinear interpolation writing to /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig.mgz... mri_add_xform_to_header -c /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/orig.mgz INFO: extension is mgz #-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Wed Jan 11 10:58:42 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri talairach_avi --i orig.mgz --xfm transforms/talairach.auto.xfm cp transforms/talairach.auto.xfm transforms/talairach.xfm #-------------------------------------------- #@# Talairach Failure Detection Wed Jan 11 10:59:10 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri talairach_afd -T 0.005 -xfm transforms/talairach.xfm talairach_afd: Talairach Transform: transforms/talairach.xfm OK (p=0.6716, pval=0.3663 >= threshold=0.0050) awk -f /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/bin/extract_talairach_avi_QA.awk /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/transforms/talairach_avi.log TalAviQA: 0.97686 z-score: 0 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Nu Intensity Correction Wed Jan 11 10:59:10 GMT 2012 mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --n 2 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/bin/mri_nu_correct.mni --i orig.mgz --o nu.mgz --uchar transforms/talairach.xfm --n 2 nIters 2 $Id: mri_nu_correct.mni,v 1.18 2011/03/02 20:16:39 nicks Exp $ Linux clare-OptiPlex-990 2.6.35-31-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 28 19:29:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux Wed Jan 11 10:59:10 GMT 2012 Program nu_correct, built from: Package MNI N3, version 1.10, compiled by nicks@minerva (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) on 2010-02-20 at 17:32:37 tmpdir is ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_convert orig.mgz ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu0.mnc -odt float mri_convert orig.mgz ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu0.mnc -odt float $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $ reading from orig.mgz... TR=11.00, TE=4.94, TI=-1.00, flip angle=15.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, 0) j_ras = (0, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 0) changing data type from uchar to float (noscale = 0)... writing to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu0.mnc... -------------------------------------------------------- Iteration 1 Wed Jan 11 10:59:11 GMT 2012 nu_correct -clobber ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu0.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu1.mnc -tmpdir ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/0/ [clare@clare-OptiPlex-990:/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/] [2012-01-11 10:59:12] running: /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/0/ ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu0.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu1.imp Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Number of iterations: 19 CV of field change: 0.000934945 [clare@clare-OptiPlex-990:/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/] [2012-01-11 10:59:24] running: /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu0.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/0//template.mnc Transforming slices:......................................................................................Done Transforming slices:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done -------------------------------------------------------- Iteration 2 Wed Jan 11 10:59:26 GMT 2012 nu_correct -clobber ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu1.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc -tmpdir ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/1/ [clare@clare-OptiPlex-990:/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/] [2012-01-11 10:59:26] running: /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/mni/bin/nu_estimate_np_and_em -parzen -log -sharpen 0.15 0.01 -iterations 50 -stop 0.001 -shrink 4 -auto_mask -nonotify -b_spline 1 -distance 200 -quiet -execute -clobber -nokeeptmp -tmpdir ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/1/ ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu1.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.imp Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Processing:.................................................................Done Number of iterations: 11 CV of field change: 0.000947363 [clare@clare-OptiPlex-990:/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/] [2012-01-11 10:59:33] running: /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/mni/bin/make_template -quiet -shrink 3 ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu1.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/1//template.mnc Transforming slices:......................................................................................Done Transforming slices:................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Done mri_binarize --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc --min -1 --o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz $Id: mri_binarize.c,v 1.26.2.1 2011/04/08 15:40:50 greve Exp $ cwd /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri cmdline mri_binarize --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc --min -1 --o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz sysname Linux hostname clare-OptiPlex-990 machine x86_64 user clare input ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc frame 0 nErode3d 0 nErode2d 0 output ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz Binarizing based on threshold min -1 max +infinity binval 1 binvalnot 0 Found 16777216 values in range Counting number of voxels Found 16777216 voxels in final mask mri_binarize done mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz --i orig.mgz --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/input.mean.dat $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.75.2.2 2011/04/27 22:18:58 nicks Exp $ cwd cmdline mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz --i orig.mgz --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/input.mean.dat sysname Linux hostname clare-OptiPlex-990 machine x86_64 user clare Loading ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz Loading orig.mgz Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 1 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation 0 1 16777216 1.67772e+07 Reporting on 1 segmentations Computing spatial average of each frame 0 Writing to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/input.mean.dat mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/output.mean.dat $Id: mri_segstats.c,v 1.75.2.2 2011/04/27 22:18:58 nicks Exp $ cwd cmdline mri_segstats --id 1 --seg ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz --i ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc --sum ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/sum.junk --avgwf ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/output.mean.dat sysname Linux hostname clare-OptiPlex-990 machine x86_64 user clare Loading ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/ones.mgz Loading ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc Voxel Volume is 1 mm^3 Generating list of segmentation ids Found 1 segmentations Computing statistics for each segmentation 0 1 16777216 1.67772e+07 Reporting on 1 segmentations Computing spatial average of each frame 0 Writing to ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/output.mean.dat mris_calc -o ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc mul .99048961322436450610 Saving result to './tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc' (type = MINC ) [ ok ] mri_convert ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc nu.mgz --like orig.mgz mri_convert ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc nu.mgz --like orig.mgz $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $ reading from ./tmp.mri_nu_correct.mni.6411/nu2.mnc... TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-1, 0, 0) j_ras = (0, 0, -1) k_ras = (0, 1, 0) INFO: transform src into the like-volume: orig.mgz writing to nu.mgz... mri_make_uchar nu.mgz transforms/talairach.xfm nu.mgz type change took 0 minutes and 6 seconds. mapping ( 5, 141) to ( 3, 110) Wed Jan 11 11:00:02 GMT 2012 mri_nu_correct.mni done #-------------------------------------------- #@# Intensity Normalization Wed Jan 11 11:00:02 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_normalize -g 1 -b 20 -n 5 nu.mgz T1.mgz using max gradient = 1.000 using control point with intensity 20.0 below target. performing 3d normalization 5 times reading from nu.mgz... normalizing image... talairach transform 0.962 0.020 0.013 -3.561; -0.037 0.920 0.196 -37.120; -0.023 -0.159 1.088 -3.214; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; INFO: Modifying talairach volume c_(r,a,s) based on average_305 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 1 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 2 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 3 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 4 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 5 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... writing output to T1.mgz 3D bias adjustment took 3 minutes and 12 seconds. MRIsplineNormalize(): npeaks = 15 Starting OpenSpline(): npoints = 15 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 109 gm peak at 87 (87), valley at 54 (54) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 73 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 83 (83), valley at 45 (45) csf peak at 42, setting threshold to 69 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 83 (83), valley at 45 (45) csf peak at 42, setting threshold to 69 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 83 (83), valley at 45 (45) csf peak at 42, setting threshold to 69 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 83 (83), valley at 45 (45) csf peak at 42, setting threshold to 69 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Skull Stripping Wed Jan 11 11:03:15 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_em_register -skull nu.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta aligning to atlas containing skull, setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 5 reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach_with_skull.log reading '/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca'... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 average std = 23.1 using min determinant for regularization = 53.4 0 singular and 5702 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized reading 'nu.mgz'... freeing gibbs priors...done. bounding unknown intensity as < 20.2 or > 943.7 total sample mean = 92.0 (1443 zeros) ************************************************ spacing=8, using 3481 sample points, tol=1.00e-05... ************************************************ register_mri: find_optimal_transform find_optimal_transform: nsamples 3481, passno 0, spacing 8 resetting wm mean[0]: 117 --> 126 resetting gm mean[0]: 74 --> 74 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=6.0 skull bounding box = (42, 20, 17) --> (207, 255, 232) using (97, 98, 125) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 126, using box (77,69,98) --> (117, 127,151) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 108 after smoothing, mri peak at 108, scaling input intensities by 1.167 scaling channel 0 by 1.16667 initial log_p = -10411.0 ************************************************ First Search limited to translation only. ************************************************ Found translation: (-1.7, 17.6, -14.2): log p = -10346.455 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 0 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-10336.0, old_max_log_p =-10346.5 (thresh=-10336.1) 1.000 0.000 0.000 -1.705; 0.000 1.111 0.298 -29.644; 0.000 -0.298 1.111 3.276; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 1 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-10336.0, old_max_log_p =-10336.0 (thresh=-10325.7) 1.000 0.000 0.000 -1.705; 0.000 1.111 0.298 -29.644; 0.000 -0.298 1.111 3.276; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reducing scale to 0.2500 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 2 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-10333.9, old_max_log_p =-10336.0 (thresh=-10325.7) 0.979 0.017 -0.072 7.861; 0.000 1.099 0.256 -25.314; 0.065 -0.261 1.118 -11.583; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reducing scale to 0.0625 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 3 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-10332.5, old_max_log_p =-10333.9 (thresh=-10323.5) 0.980 0.019 -0.081 8.670; 0.001 1.093 0.274 -27.045; 0.073 -0.279 1.114 -10.268; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; min search scale 0.025000 reached *********************************************** Computing MAP estimate using 3481 samples... *********************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.97973 0.01906 -0.08108 8.67047; 0.00107 1.09327 0.27417 -27.04503; 0.07349 -0.27870 1.11390 -10.26785; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 3481 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.97973 0.01906 -0.08108 8.67047; 0.00107 1.09327 0.27417 -27.04503; 0.07349 -0.27870 1.11390 -10.26785; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 006: -log(p) = 10332.5 tol 0.000010 Resulting transform: 0.980 0.019 -0.081 8.670; 0.001 1.093 0.274 -27.045; 0.073 -0.279 1.114 -10.268; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -10332.5 (old=-10411.0) transform before final EM align: 0.980 0.019 -0.081 8.670; 0.001 1.093 0.274 -27.045; 0.073 -0.279 1.114 -10.268; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; ************************************************** EM alignment process ... Computing final MAP estimate using 382743 samples. ************************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.97973 0.01906 -0.08108 8.67047; 0.00107 1.09327 0.27417 -27.04503; 0.07349 -0.27870 1.11390 -10.26785; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 382743 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.97973 0.01906 -0.08108 8.67047; 0.00107 1.09327 0.27417 -27.04503; 0.07349 -0.27870 1.11390 -10.26785; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; dfp_em_step_func: 007: -log(p) = 1145887.2 after pass:transform: ( 0.98, 0.02, -0.08, 8.67) ( 0.00, 1.09, 0.28, -27.05) ( 0.07, -0.28, 1.11, -10.27) dfp_em_step_func: 008: -log(p) = 1145862.5 after pass:transform: ( 0.98, 0.02, -0.08, 8.67) ( 0.00, 1.09, 0.28, -27.05) ( 0.07, -0.28, 1.11, -10.27) IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESpass 2 through quasi-newton minimization... dfp_em_step_func: 009: -log(p) = 1145855.8 after pass:transform: ( 0.98, 0.02, -0.08, 8.67) ( 0.00, 1.10, 0.28, -27.05) ( 0.07, -0.28, 1.11, -10.27) dfp_em_step_func: 010: -log(p) = 1145850.6 after pass:transform: ( 0.98, 0.02, -0.08, 8.67) ( 0.00, 1.10, 0.28, -27.05) ( 0.07, -0.28, 1.11, -10.27) IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESpass 3 through quasi-newton minimization... IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 012: -log(p) = 1145850.6 tol 0.000000 final transform: 0.980 0.019 -0.081 8.670; 0.004 1.095 0.277 -27.045; 0.074 -0.278 1.114 -10.268; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; writing output transformation to transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta... registration took 13 minutes and 35 seconds. mri_watershed -T1 -brain_atlas /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta T1.mgz brainmask.auto.mgz Mode: T1 normalized volume Mode: Use the information of atlas (default parms, --help for details) gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 ********************************************************* The input file is T1.mgz The output file is brainmask.auto.mgz Weighting the input with atlas information before watershed *************************WATERSHED************************** Sorting... first estimation of the COG coord: x=128 y=101 z=128 r=92 first estimation of the main basin volume: 3347791 voxels Looking for seedpoints 2 found in the cerebellum 16 found in the rest of the brain global maximum in x=104, y=78, z=96, Imax=255 CSF=18, WM_intensity=110, WM_VARIANCE=5 WM_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MIN=110, WM_HALF_MAX=110, WM_MAX=110 preflooding height equal to 10 percent done. Analyze... main basin size=26950149803 voxels, voxel volume =1.000 = 26950149803 mmm3 = 26950150.144 cm3 done. PostAnalyze...Basin Prior 309 basins merged thanks to atlas ***** 0 basin(s) merged in 1 iteration(s) ***** 0 voxel(s) added to the main basin done. Weighting the input with prior template ****************TEMPLATE DEFORMATION**************** second estimation of the COG coord: x=127,y=102, z=114, r=10957 iterations ^^^^^^^^ couldn't find WM with original limits - expanding ^^^^^^ GLOBAL CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=41 , nb = 41724 RIGHT_CER CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=12 , nb = 1692 LEFT_CER CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=19 , nb = 1836 RIGHT_BRAIN CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=35 , nb = 19188 LEFT_BRAIN CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=44 , nb = 17838 OTHER CSF_MIN=1, CSF_intensity=2, CSF_MAX=6 , nb = 1170 CSF_MAX TRANSITION GM_MIN GM GLOBAL before analyzing : 41, 49, 57, 89 after analyzing : 41, 54, 57, 62 RIGHT_CER before analyzing : 12, 21, 56, 91 after analyzing : 12, 44, 56, 55 LEFT_CER before analyzing : 19, 34, 61, 91 after analyzing : 19, 52, 61, 61 RIGHT_BRAIN before analyzing : 35, 48, 59, 85 after analyzing : 35, 55, 59, 62 LEFT_BRAIN before analyzing : 44, 52, 58, 86 after analyzing : 44, 56, 58, 63 OTHER before analyzing : 6, 6, 20, 79 after analyzing : 6, 18, 25, 33 mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain highly tesselated surface with 10242 vertices matching...71 iterations *********************VALIDATION********************* curvature mean = -0.013, std = 0.009 curvature mean = 76.021, std = 7.760 No Rigid alignment: -atlas Mode Off (basic atlas / no registration) before rotation: sse = 2.73, sigma = 4.05 after rotation: sse = 2.73, sigma = 4.05 Localization of inacurate regions: Erosion-Dilation steps the sse mean is 2.93, its var is 4.03 before Erosion-Dilatation 0.74% of inacurate vertices after Erosion-Dilatation 0.00% of inacurate vertices Validation of the shape of the surface done. Scaling of atlas fields onto current surface fields ********FINAL ITERATIVE TEMPLATE DEFORMATION******** Compute Local values csf/gray Fine Segmentation...49 iterations mri_strip_skull: done peeling brain Brain Size = 2067964 voxels, voxel volume = 1.000 mm3 = 2067964 mmm3 = 2067.964 cm3 ****************************** Saving brainmask.auto.mgz done cp brainmask.auto.mgz brainmask.mgz #------------------------------------- #@# EM Registration Wed Jan 11 11:17:12 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_em_register -uns 3 -mask brainmask.mgz nu.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca transforms/talairach.lta aligning to atlas containing skull, setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 3 using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach.log reading '/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca'... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 average std = 6.9 using min determinant for regularization = 4.7 0 singular and 1812 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized reading 'nu.mgz'... freeing gibbs priors...done. bounding unknown intensity as < 14.9 or > 790.2 total sample mean = 84.4 (994 zeros) ************************************************ spacing=8, using 2772 sample points, tol=1.00e-05... ************************************************ register_mri: find_optimal_transform find_optimal_transform: nsamples 2772, passno 0, spacing 8 resetting wm mean[0]: 102 --> 107 resetting gm mean[0]: 64 --> 64 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=21.0 skull bounding box = (53, 29, 29) --> (198, 180, 217) using (101, 79, 123) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 107, using box (83,60,100) --> (118, 97,146) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 108 after smoothing, mri peak at 107, scaling input intensities by 1.000 scaling channel 0 by 1 initial log_p = -7560.3 ************************************************ First Search limited to translation only. ************************************************ Found translation: (-4.0, 18.7, -6.3): log p = -7153.909 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 0 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-7051.5, old_max_log_p =-7153.9 (thresh=-7146.8) 1.000 0.000 0.000 -3.977; 0.000 1.055 0.103 1.828; 0.000 -0.150 0.843 26.325; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 1 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-7051.5, old_max_log_p =-7051.5 (thresh=-7044.4) 1.000 0.000 0.000 -3.977; 0.000 1.055 0.103 1.828; 0.000 -0.150 0.843 26.325; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reducing scale to 0.2500 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 2 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-7025.5, old_max_log_p =-7051.5 (thresh=-7044.4) 1.018 0.038 -0.026 -5.359; -0.033 1.081 0.049 9.480; 0.033 -0.079 0.831 14.333; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 3 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-7002.2, old_max_log_p =-7025.5 (thresh=-7018.5) 0.980 -0.000 -0.026 3.378; -0.002 1.123 0.050 1.277; 0.035 -0.082 0.862 12.796; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 4 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-7001.0, old_max_log_p =-7002.2 (thresh=-6995.2) 0.960 0.071 -0.019 -1.967; -0.063 1.092 0.106 4.096; 0.035 -0.158 0.873 17.223; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reducing scale to 0.0625 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 5 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-6982.8, old_max_log_p =-7001.0 (thresh=-6994.0) 0.959 0.051 -0.006 -2.710; -0.049 1.099 0.070 6.964; 0.017 -0.114 0.876 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 6 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-6974.5, old_max_log_p =-6982.8 (thresh=-6975.8) 0.962 0.052 -0.006 -3.165; -0.049 1.099 0.070 6.964; 0.017 -0.114 0.876 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 7 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-6974.5, old_max_log_p =-6974.5 (thresh=-6967.6) 0.962 0.052 -0.006 -3.165; -0.049 1.099 0.070 6.964; 0.017 -0.114 0.876 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; min search scale 0.025000 reached *********************************************** Computing MAP estimate using 2772 samples... *********************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.96210 0.05164 -0.00585 -3.16550; -0.04886 1.09946 0.06979 6.96448; 0.01710 -0.11422 0.87558 15.73879; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 2772 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.96210 0.05164 -0.00585 -3.16550; -0.04886 1.09946 0.06979 6.96448; 0.01710 -0.11422 0.87558 15.73879; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 010: -log(p) = 6974.5 tol 0.000010 Resulting transform: 0.962 0.052 -0.006 -3.165; -0.049 1.099 0.070 6.964; 0.017 -0.114 0.876 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -6974.5 (old=-7560.3) transform before final EM align: 0.962 0.052 -0.006 -3.165; -0.049 1.099 0.070 6.964; 0.017 -0.114 0.876 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; ************************************************** EM alignment process ... Computing final MAP estimate using 312841 samples. ************************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 0.96210 0.05164 -0.00585 -3.16550; -0.04886 1.09946 0.06979 6.96448; 0.01710 -0.11422 0.87558 15.73879; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 312841 Quasinewton: input matrix 0.96210 0.05164 -0.00585 -3.16550; -0.04886 1.09946 0.06979 6.96448; 0.01710 -0.11422 0.87558 15.73879; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; dfp_em_step_func: 011: -log(p) = 834323.4 after pass:transform: ( 0.97, 0.06, 0.00, -3.17) ( -0.04, 1.10, 0.08, 6.96) ( 0.01, -0.12, 0.87, 15.74) dfp_em_step_func: 012: -log(p) = 834319.4 after pass:transform: ( 0.97, 0.06, 0.00, -3.17) ( -0.04, 1.10, 0.08, 6.96) ( 0.01, -0.12, 0.87, 15.74) IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESpass 2 through quasi-newton minimization... IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 014: -log(p) = 834319.4 tol 0.000000 final transform: 0.969 0.057 0.002 -3.165; -0.043 1.102 0.076 6.964; 0.014 -0.117 0.874 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.lta... registration took 19 minutes and 34 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# CA Normalize Wed Jan 11 11:36:46 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_ca_normalize -c ctrl_pts.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz nu.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca transforms/talairach.lta norm.mgz writing control point volume to ctrl_pts.mgz using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... reading 1 input volumes reading atlas from '/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca'... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 reading transform from 'transforms/talairach.lta'... reading input volume from nu.mgz... resetting wm mean[0]: 102 --> 107 resetting gm mean[0]: 64 --> 64 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=21.0 skull bounding box = (53, 29, 29) --> (198, 180, 217) using (101, 79, 123) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 107, using box (83,60,100) --> (118, 97,146) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 108 after smoothing, mri peak at 107, scaling input intensities by 1.000 scaling channel 0 by 1 using 244171 sample points... INFO: compute sample coordinates transform 0.969 0.057 0.002 -3.165; -0.043 1.102 0.076 6.964; 0.014 -0.117 0.874 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; INFO: transform used finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 41584 control points for structure... bounding box (124, 39, 24) --> (195, 144, 215) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 100.0 --> 211.0 0 of 11 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 40735 control points for structure... bounding box (60, 39, 24) --> (128, 142, 216) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 95.0 --> 211.0 0 of 13 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 3012 control points for structure... bounding box (127, 115, 53) --> (176, 156, 115) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 104.0 --> 211.0 2 of 9 (22.2%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 2764 control points for structure... bounding box (77, 115, 51) --> (126, 153, 116) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 97.0 --> 211.0 0 of 14 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Brain_Stem.... found 3520 control points for structure... bounding box (108, 109, 93) --> (143, 171, 128) Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 92.0 --> 211.0 0 of 17 (0.0%) samples deleted using 64 total control points for intensity normalization... bias field = 0.921 +- 0.104 0 of 62 control points discarded finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 41584 control points for structure... bounding box (124, 39, 24) --> (195, 144, 215) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 89.0 --> 199.0 0 of 94 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 40735 control points for structure... bounding box (60, 39, 24) --> (128, 142, 216) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 93.0 --> 199.0 0 of 107 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 3012 control points for structure... bounding box (127, 115, 53) --> (176, 156, 115) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 82.0 --> 199.0 0 of 39 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 2764 control points for structure... bounding box (77, 115, 51) --> (126, 153, 116) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 85.0 --> 199.0 0 of 27 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Brain_Stem.... found 3520 control points for structure... bounding box (108, 109, 93) --> (143, 171, 128) Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 75.0 --> 199.0 0 of 58 (0.0%) samples deleted using 325 total control points for intensity normalization... bias field = 1.009 +- 0.059 0 of 325 control points discarded finding control points in Left_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 41584 control points for structure... bounding box (124, 39, 24) --> (195, 144, 215) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 90.0 --> 204.0 0 of 265 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebral_White_Matter.... found 40735 control points for structure... bounding box (60, 39, 24) --> (128, 142, 216) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 91.0 --> 204.0 0 of 227 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 3012 control points for structure... bounding box (127, 115, 53) --> (176, 156, 115) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 80.0 --> 204.0 0 of 67 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter.... found 2764 control points for structure... bounding box (77, 115, 51) --> (126, 153, 116) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter: limiting intensities to 80.0 --> 204.0 0 of 46 (0.0%) samples deleted finding control points in Brain_Stem.... found 3520 control points for structure... bounding box (108, 109, 93) --> (143, 171, 128) Brain_Stem: limiting intensities to 89.0 --> 204.0 47 of 88 (53.4%) samples deleted using 693 total control points for intensity normalization... bias field = 1.003 +- 0.047 1 of 646 control points discarded writing normalized volume to norm.mgz... writing control points to ctrl_pts.mgz freeing GCA...done. normalization took 1 minutes and 14 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# CA Reg Wed Jan 11 11:38:00 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_ca_register -nobigventricles -T transforms/talairach.lta -align-after -mask brainmask.mgz norm.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca transforms/talairach.m3z not handling expanded ventricles... using previously computed transform transforms/talairach.lta renormalizing sequences with structure alignment, equivalent to: -renormalize -regularize_mean 0.500 -regularize 0.500 using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach.log reading input volume 'norm.mgz'... reading GCA '/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca'... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 freeing gibbs priors...done. average std[0] = 5.0 label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) det(m_affine) = 0.94 (predicted orig area = 8.5) label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ setting smoothness coefficient to 0.039 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.845, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18886.777 ms 0001: dt=295.936000, rms=0.783 (7.267%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18942.816 ms 0002: dt=129.472000, rms=0.774 (1.141%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18904.521 ms 0003: dt=129.472000, rms=0.768 (0.814%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18901.984 ms 0004: dt=129.472000, rms=0.765 (0.469%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19285.004 ms 0005: dt=443.904000, rms=0.757 (0.929%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18899.596 ms 0006: dt=73.984000, rms=0.753 (0.538%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20082.193 ms 0007: dt=1479.680000, rms=0.743 (1.354%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18921.680 ms 0008: dt=110.976000, rms=0.739 (0.527%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20089.793 ms 0009: dt=517.888000, rms=0.737 (0.331%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20074.402 ms 0010: dt=129.472000, rms=0.736 (0.173%), neg=0, invalid=766 0011: dt=129.472000, rms=0.735 (0.070%), neg=0, invalid=766 0012: dt=129.472000, rms=0.734 (0.150%), neg=0, invalid=766 0013: dt=129.472000, rms=0.732 (0.221%), neg=0, invalid=766 0014: dt=129.472000, rms=0.731 (0.221%), neg=0, invalid=766 0015: dt=129.472000, rms=0.729 (0.186%), neg=0, invalid=766 0016: dt=129.472000, rms=0.728 (0.209%), neg=0, invalid=766 0017: dt=129.472000, rms=0.726 (0.239%), neg=0, invalid=766 0018: dt=129.472000, rms=0.724 (0.210%), neg=0, invalid=766 0019: dt=129.472000, rms=0.724 (0.131%), neg=0, invalid=766 0020: dt=129.472000, rms=0.722 (0.185%), neg=0, invalid=766 0021: dt=129.472000, rms=0.721 (0.217%), neg=0, invalid=766 0022: dt=129.472000, rms=0.719 (0.172%), neg=0, invalid=766 0023: dt=129.472000, rms=0.719 (0.115%), neg=0, invalid=766 0024: dt=129.472000, rms=0.718 (0.134%), neg=0, invalid=766 0025: dt=129.472000, rms=0.716 (0.226%), neg=0, invalid=766 0026: dt=129.472000, rms=0.715 (0.200%), neg=0, invalid=766 0027: dt=129.472000, rms=0.714 (0.114%), neg=0, invalid=766 0028: dt=129.472000, rms=0.713 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20346.656 ms 0029: dt=443.904000, rms=0.712 (0.249%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 25140.475 ms 0030: dt=0.000135, rms=0.712 (-0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.712, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19087.662 ms 0031: dt=129.472000, rms=0.708 (0.479%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20366.021 ms 0032: dt=129.472000, rms=0.708 (0.088%), neg=0, invalid=766 0033: dt=129.472000, rms=0.706 (0.154%), neg=0, invalid=766 0034: dt=129.472000, rms=0.706 (0.118%), neg=0, invalid=766 0035: dt=129.472000, rms=0.705 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20267.697 ms 0036: dt=295.936000, rms=0.704 (0.164%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19071.703 ms 0037: dt=27.744000, rms=0.704 (0.013%), neg=0, invalid=766 0038: dt=27.744000, rms=0.704 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.154 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.716, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17977.701 ms 0039: dt=20.736000, rms=0.715 (0.133%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19277.703 ms 0040: dt=82.944000, rms=0.711 (0.487%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19047.590 ms 0041: dt=124.416000, rms=0.703 (1.191%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19221.236 ms 0042: dt=20.983607, rms=0.697 (0.849%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20854.316 ms 0043: dt=0.025336, rms=0.697 (0.011%), neg=0, invalid=766 0044: dt=0.025336, rms=0.697 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.697, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19159.068 ms 0045: dt=103.680000, rms=0.691 (0.873%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19212.041 ms 0046: dt=36.288000, rms=0.689 (0.269%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19095.352 ms 0047: dt=145.152000, rms=0.686 (0.470%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19009.047 ms 0048: dt=25.920000, rms=0.685 (0.179%), neg=0, invalid=766 0049: dt=25.920000, rms=0.684 (0.113%), neg=0, invalid=766 0050: dt=25.920000, rms=0.683 (0.164%), neg=0, invalid=766 0051: dt=25.920000, rms=0.681 (0.199%), neg=0, invalid=766 0052: dt=25.920000, rms=0.680 (0.231%), neg=0, invalid=766 0053: dt=25.920000, rms=0.678 (0.280%), neg=0, invalid=766 0054: dt=25.920000, rms=0.676 (0.306%), neg=0, invalid=766 0055: dt=25.920000, rms=0.674 (0.294%), neg=0, invalid=766 0056: dt=25.920000, rms=0.672 (0.270%), neg=0, invalid=766 0057: dt=25.920000, rms=0.670 (0.255%), neg=0, invalid=766 0058: dt=25.920000, rms=0.669 (0.247%), neg=0, invalid=766 0059: dt=25.920000, rms=0.667 (0.270%), neg=0, invalid=766 0060: dt=25.920000, rms=0.665 (0.259%), neg=0, invalid=766 0061: dt=25.920000, rms=0.663 (0.238%), neg=0, invalid=766 0062: dt=25.920000, rms=0.662 (0.206%), neg=0, invalid=766 0063: dt=25.920000, rms=0.661 (0.185%), neg=0, invalid=766 0064: dt=25.920000, rms=0.660 (0.186%), neg=0, invalid=766 0065: dt=25.920000, rms=0.658 (0.200%), neg=0, invalid=766 0066: dt=25.920000, rms=0.657 (0.194%), neg=0, invalid=766 0067: dt=25.920000, rms=0.656 (0.179%), neg=0, invalid=766 0068: dt=25.920000, rms=0.655 (0.162%), neg=0, invalid=766 0069: dt=25.920000, rms=0.654 (0.165%), neg=0, invalid=766 0070: dt=25.920000, rms=0.653 (0.152%), neg=0, invalid=766 0071: dt=25.920000, rms=0.652 (0.141%), neg=0, invalid=766 0072: dt=25.920000, rms=0.651 (0.120%), neg=0, invalid=766 0073: dt=25.920000, rms=0.650 (0.094%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20329.354 ms 0074: dt=145.152000, rms=0.650 (0.049%), neg=0, invalid=766 0075: dt=145.152000, rms=0.650 (-0.324%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.588 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.678, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20454.654 ms 0076: dt=5.333333, rms=0.678 (0.045%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19215.646 ms 0077: dt=1.600000, rms=0.678 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0078: dt=1.600000, rms=0.678 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 0079: dt=1.600000, rms=0.678 (-0.012%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.678, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19245.832 ms 0080: dt=1.200000, rms=0.678 (0.003%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20308.787 ms 0081: dt=0.300000, rms=0.678 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 0082: dt=0.300000, rms=0.678 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0083: dt=0.300000, rms=0.678 (-0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.754, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18985.451 ms 0084: dt=6.082192, rms=0.733 (2.782%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19045.391 ms 0085: dt=6.666667, rms=0.729 (0.580%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18973.867 ms 0086: dt=2.304000, rms=0.729 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=766 0087: dt=2.304000, rms=0.728 (0.015%), neg=0, invalid=766 0088: dt=2.304000, rms=0.728 (-0.024%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.728, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17963.068 ms 0089: dt=0.000000, rms=0.728 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 5.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.785, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19224.793 ms 0090: dt=0.005002, rms=0.785 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0091: dt=0.005002, rms=0.785 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.785, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18002.807 ms 0092: dt=0.320000, rms=0.784 (0.066%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17982.924 ms 0093: dt=0.340000, rms=0.784 (0.037%), neg=0, invalid=766 0094: dt=0.340000, rms=0.784 (0.042%), neg=0, invalid=766 0095: dt=0.340000, rms=0.784 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=766 0096: dt=0.340000, rms=0.784 (-0.012%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 10.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.711, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17833.527 ms 0097: dt=0.448000, rms=0.697 (2.025%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15444.033 ms 0098: dt=0.000000, rms=0.697 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=766 0099: dt=0.050000, rms=0.697 (-0.249%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.697, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16888.879 ms 0100: dt=0.001750, rms=0.697 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16601.408 ms 0101: dt=0.000250, rms=0.697 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15558.747 ms 0102: dt=0.000000, rms=0.697 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 renormalizing by structure alignment.... renormalizing input #0 gca peak = 0.11725 (24) mri peak = 0.10464 (34) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (1474 voxels, overlap=0.653) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (1474 voxels, peak = 29), gca=28.8 gca peak = 0.14022 (22) mri peak = 0.13953 (30) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (1907 voxels, overlap=0.634) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (1907 voxels, peak = 29), gca=28.6 gca peak = 0.24234 (100) mri peak = 0.06762 (96) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 0.95 x + 0.0 (558 voxels, overlap=0.913) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 0.95 x + 0.0 (558 voxels, peak = 95), gca=95.0 gca peak = 0.19192 (97) mri peak = 0.07166 (94) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (465 voxels, overlap=0.837) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (465 voxels, peak = 95), gca=94.6 gca peak = 0.24007 (63) mri peak = 0.08208 (75) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (670 voxels, overlap=0.021) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (670 voxels, peak = 72), gca=72.4 gca peak = 0.29892 (64) mri peak = 0.06384 (80) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.17 x + 0.0 (766 voxels, overlap=0.039) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.17 x + 0.0 (766 voxels, peak = 75), gca=75.2 gca peak = 0.12541 (104) mri peak = 0.08689 (107) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (108447 voxels, overlap=0.812) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (108447 voxels, peak = 107), gca=106.6 gca peak = 0.13686 (104) mri peak = 0.07402 (105) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (112226 voxels, overlap=0.866) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (112226 voxels, peak = 107), gca=106.6 gca peak = 0.11691 (63) mri peak = 0.04676 (93) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.35 x + 0.0 (49172 voxels, overlap=0.000) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.35 x + 0.0 (49172 voxels, peak = 85), gca=85.1 gca peak = 0.13270 (63) mri peak = 0.05883 (95) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (50750 voxels, overlap=0.000) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.38 x + 0.0 (50750 voxels, peak = 87), gca=86.6 gca peak = 0.15182 (70) mri peak = 0.11636 (84) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.17 x + 0.0 (857 voxels, overlap=0.044) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.17 x + 0.0 (857 voxels, peak = 82), gca=82.2 gca peak = 0.14251 (76) mri peak = 0.08500 (85) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (1051 voxels, overlap=0.614) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (1051 voxels, peak = 82), gca=81.7 gca peak = 0.12116 (60) mri peak = 0.05582 (72) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.25 x + 0.0 (31398 voxels, overlap=0.003) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.25 x + 0.0 (31398 voxels, peak = 75), gca=75.0 gca peak = 0.12723 (61) mri peak = 0.05205 (75) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.25 x + 0.0 (31236 voxels, overlap=0.006) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.25 x + 0.0 (31236 voxels, peak = 76), gca=76.2 gca peak = 0.22684 (88) mri peak = 0.07519 (88) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (12385 voxels, overlap=0.975) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (12385 voxels, peak = 90), gca=90.2 gca peak = 0.21067 (87) mri peak = 0.06521 (88) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (10808 voxels, overlap=0.969) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (10808 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.2 gca peak = 0.25455 (62) mri peak = 0.07342 (67) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (396 voxels, overlap=0.419) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (396 voxels, peak = 68), gca=68.2 gca peak = 0.39668 (62) mri peak = 0.10758 (72) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (407 voxels, overlap=0.141) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (407 voxels, peak = 71), gca=71.3 gca peak = 0.10129 (93) mri peak = 0.06654 (97) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (6308 voxels, overlap=0.932) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (6308 voxels, peak = 95), gca=95.3 gca peak = 0.12071 (89) mri peak = 0.06566 (93) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (5670 voxels, overlap=0.783) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (5670 voxels, peak = 93), gca=93.4 gca peak = 0.13716 (82) mri peak = 0.06787 (88) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (2999 voxels, overlap=0.700) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (2999 voxels, peak = 90), gca=90.2 gca peak = 0.15214 (84) mri peak = 0.07127 (89) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (3204 voxels, overlap=0.792) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (3204 voxels, peak = 90), gca=90.3 gca peak = 0.08983 (85) mri peak = 0.07223 (88) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (15222 voxels, overlap=0.777) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (15222 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.2 gca peak = 0.11809 (92) mri peak = 0.08475 (95) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (1409 voxels, overlap=0.705) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (1409 voxels, peak = 94), gca=94.3 gca peak = 0.12914 (94) mri peak = 0.08978 (96) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1471 voxels, overlap=0.832) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1471 voxels, peak = 94), gca=94.0 gca peak = 0.21100 (36) mri peak = 0.15385 (24) gca peak = 0.13542 (27) mri peak = 0.11980 (27) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (467 voxels, overlap=0.927) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (467 voxels, peak = 28), gca=28.3 gca peak Unknown = 0.94427 ( 0) gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.21802 (40) gca peak Third_Ventricle = 0.21100 (36) gca peak CSF = 0.17123 (45) gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.25875 (69) gca peak Left_undetermined = 0.96240 (36) gca peak Left_vessel = 0.33262 (65) gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.09846 (46) gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.28113 (34) gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.27120 (72) gca peak Right_vessel = 0.61915 (60) gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.12775 (51) gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.45329 (44) gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.11729 (81) gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.10912 (56) gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.33287 (75) not using caudate to estimate GM means estimating mean gm scale to be 1.22 x + 0.0 estimating mean wm scale to be 1.02 x + 0.0 estimating mean csf scale to be 1.18 x + 0.0 saving intensity scales to talairach.label_intensities.txt label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ setting smoothness coefficient to 0.008 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.674, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16532.104 ms 0103: dt=92.480000, rms=0.647 (4.065%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18890.162 ms 0104: dt=129.472000, rms=0.642 (0.779%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18900.891 ms 0105: dt=295.936000, rms=0.638 (0.677%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18927.203 ms 0106: dt=92.480000, rms=0.635 (0.390%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19421.320 ms 0107: dt=129.472000, rms=0.634 (0.239%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20551.504 ms 0108: dt=129.472000, rms=0.633 (0.172%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19692.934 ms 0109: dt=129.472000, rms=0.632 (0.158%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21197.102 ms 0110: dt=129.472000, rms=0.631 (0.113%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19213.361 ms 0111: dt=129.472000, rms=0.630 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20395.455 ms 0112: dt=129.472000, rms=0.629 (0.086%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19306.404 ms 0113: dt=295.936000, rms=0.628 (0.164%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19142.904 ms 0114: dt=55.488000, rms=0.628 (0.103%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20066.307 ms 0115: dt=221.952000, rms=0.627 (0.073%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18891.271 ms 0116: dt=129.472000, rms=0.626 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20082.564 ms 0117: dt=92.480000, rms=0.626 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=766 0118: dt=92.480000, rms=0.626 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=766 0119: dt=92.480000, rms=0.625 (0.086%), neg=0, invalid=766 0120: dt=92.480000, rms=0.625 (0.101%), neg=0, invalid=766 0121: dt=92.480000, rms=0.624 (0.116%), neg=0, invalid=766 0122: dt=92.480000, rms=0.623 (0.130%), neg=0, invalid=766 0123: dt=92.480000, rms=0.622 (0.153%), neg=0, invalid=766 0124: dt=92.480000, rms=0.621 (0.158%), neg=0, invalid=766 0125: dt=92.480000, rms=0.620 (0.141%), neg=0, invalid=766 0126: dt=92.480000, rms=0.619 (0.129%), neg=0, invalid=766 0127: dt=92.480000, rms=0.619 (0.129%), neg=0, invalid=766 0128: dt=92.480000, rms=0.619 (0.027%), neg=0, invalid=766 0129: dt=92.480000, rms=0.618 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=766 0130: dt=92.480000, rms=0.618 (0.047%), neg=0, invalid=766 0131: dt=92.480000, rms=0.618 (0.060%), neg=0, invalid=766 0132: dt=92.480000, rms=0.617 (0.069%), neg=0, invalid=766 0133: dt=92.480000, rms=0.617 (0.019%), neg=0, invalid=766 0134: dt=0.722500, rms=0.617 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 13018.513 ms 0135: dt=0.505750, rms=0.617 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 13013.294 ms 0136: dt=0.505750, rms=0.617 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.617, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11836.219 ms 0137: dt=0.108375, rms=0.617 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 8310.807 ms 0138: dt=0.000000, rms=0.617 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.031 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.617, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 8322.103 ms 0139: dt=0.000000, rms=0.617 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.617, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 8306.006 ms 0140: dt=0.000000, rms=0.617 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.118 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.619, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 8314.616 ms 0141: dt=0.000000, rms=0.619 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.619, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17727.568 ms 0142: dt=44.800000, rms=0.584 (5.590%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17713.979 ms 0143: dt=38.400000, rms=0.575 (1.617%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17724.250 ms 0144: dt=23.125000, rms=0.568 (1.221%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16114.000 ms 0145: dt=2.800000, rms=0.567 (0.190%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17303.725 ms 0146: dt=8.000000, rms=0.564 (0.404%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17200.207 ms 0147: dt=11.200000, rms=0.562 (0.426%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16972.803 ms 0148: dt=11.200000, rms=0.560 (0.398%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16571.738 ms 0149: dt=11.200000, rms=0.557 (0.473%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16766.639 ms 0150: dt=11.200000, rms=0.556 (0.278%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17976.037 ms 0151: dt=44.800000, rms=0.550 (1.057%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17913.893 ms 0152: dt=7.891156, rms=0.549 (0.155%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17910.758 ms 0153: dt=44.800000, rms=0.544 (0.850%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16889.783 ms 0154: dt=8.000000, rms=0.544 (0.077%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18108.035 ms 0155: dt=44.800000, rms=0.540 (0.608%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18083.213 ms 0156: dt=8.086957, rms=0.540 (0.110%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16662.346 ms 0157: dt=11.200000, rms=0.539 (0.167%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19288.119 ms 0158: dt=128.000000, rms=0.534 (0.998%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16270.810 ms 0159: dt=2.800000, rms=0.533 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15559.955 ms 0160: dt=0.600000, rms=0.533 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=766 0161: dt=0.037500, rms=0.533 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.400 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.544, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 14312.686 ms 0162: dt=0.015750, rms=0.544 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11054.398 ms 0163: dt=0.000984, rms=0.544 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15366.846 ms 0164: dt=0.000450, rms=0.544 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0165: dt=0.000056, rms=0.544 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0166: dt=0.000004, rms=0.544 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.544, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 8349.323 ms 0167: dt=0.000000, rms=0.544 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 1.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.567, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18475.035 ms 0168: dt=1.280000, rms=0.562 (0.829%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16759.582 ms 0169: dt=0.448000, rms=0.562 (0.142%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18347.717 ms 0170: dt=1.872340, rms=0.560 (0.235%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16757.609 ms 0171: dt=0.028000, rms=0.560 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0172: dt=0.028000, rms=0.560 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.560, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16572.805 ms 0173: dt=0.448000, rms=0.560 (0.137%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18258.035 ms 0174: dt=1.792000, rms=0.557 (0.359%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16579.225 ms 0175: dt=0.700000, rms=0.557 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17794.309 ms 0176: dt=1.714286, rms=0.557 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16621.600 ms 0177: dt=0.448000, rms=0.557 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=766 0178: dt=0.448000, rms=0.557 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=766 0179: dt=0.448000, rms=0.557 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=766 0180: dt=0.448000, rms=0.557 (-0.013%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.535, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16503.088 ms 0181: dt=0.112000, rms=0.531 (0.819%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16127.057 ms 0182: dt=0.028000, rms=0.530 (0.166%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15642.284 ms 0183: dt=0.028000, rms=0.529 (0.151%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18600.246 ms 0184: dt=0.096000, rms=0.526 (0.494%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 18785.951 ms 0185: dt=0.080000, rms=0.525 (0.336%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15427.581 ms 0186: dt=0.028000, rms=0.524 (0.104%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17904.191 ms 0187: dt=0.119223, rms=0.522 (0.415%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16648.086 ms 0188: dt=0.080000, rms=0.521 (0.217%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17398.643 ms 0189: dt=0.096000, rms=0.520 (0.234%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16802.992 ms 0190: dt=0.028000, rms=0.519 (0.057%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17623.564 ms 0191: dt=0.080000, rms=0.519 (0.158%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 17411.432 ms 0192: dt=0.112000, rms=0.518 (0.197%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16812.965 ms 0193: dt=0.028000, rms=0.517 (0.039%), neg=0, invalid=766 0194: dt=0.028000, rms=0.517 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=766 0195: dt=0.028000, rms=0.517 (0.074%), neg=0, invalid=766 0196: dt=0.028000, rms=0.516 (0.104%), neg=0, invalid=766 0197: dt=0.028000, rms=0.516 (0.122%), neg=0, invalid=766 0198: dt=0.028000, rms=0.515 (0.133%), neg=0, invalid=766 0199: dt=0.014000, rms=0.515 (0.010%), neg=0, invalid=766 0200: dt=0.014000, rms=0.515 (0.023%), neg=0, invalid=766 0201: dt=0.014000, rms=0.515 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=766 0202: dt=0.014000, rms=0.514 (0.035%), neg=0, invalid=766 0203: dt=0.014000, rms=0.514 (0.045%), neg=0, invalid=766 0204: dt=0.014000, rms=0.514 (0.047%), neg=0, invalid=766 0205: dt=0.014000, rms=0.514 (0.052%), neg=0, invalid=766 0206: dt=0.014000, rms=0.513 (0.056%), neg=0, invalid=766 0207: dt=0.014000, rms=0.513 (0.054%), neg=0, invalid=766 0208: dt=0.014000, rms=0.513 (0.059%), neg=0, invalid=766 0209: dt=0.014000, rms=0.512 (0.059%), neg=0, invalid=766 0210: dt=0.014000, rms=0.512 (0.055%), neg=0, invalid=766 0211: dt=0.014000, rms=0.512 (0.055%), neg=0, invalid=766 0212: dt=0.014000, rms=0.512 (0.053%), neg=0, invalid=766 0213: dt=0.014000, rms=0.511 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=766 0214: dt=0.014000, rms=0.511 (0.049%), neg=0, invalid=766 0215: dt=0.014000, rms=0.511 (0.044%), neg=0, invalid=766 0216: dt=0.014000, rms=0.511 (0.042%), neg=0, invalid=766 0217: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.040%), neg=0, invalid=766 0218: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.037%), neg=0, invalid=766 0219: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=766 0220: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=766 0221: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 0222: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0223: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0224: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0225: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.003%), neg=0, invalid=766 0226: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.006%), neg=0, invalid=766 0227: dt=0.014000, rms=0.510 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16506.699 ms 0228: dt=0.096000, rms=0.510 (0.010%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15338.072 ms 0229: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 0230: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0231: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=766 0232: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.003%), neg=0, invalid=766 0233: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 0234: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 0235: dt=0.028000, rms=0.510 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.510, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 16499.367 ms 0236: dt=0.116453, rms=0.508 (0.387%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 14172.678 ms 0237: dt=0.007000, rms=0.508 (0.019%), neg=0, invalid=766 0238: dt=0.007000, rms=0.507 (0.018%), neg=0, invalid=766 0239: dt=0.007000, rms=0.507 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=766 0240: dt=0.007000, rms=0.507 (0.046%), neg=0, invalid=766 0241: dt=0.007000, rms=0.507 (0.055%), neg=0, invalid=766 0242: dt=0.007000, rms=0.506 (0.066%), neg=0, invalid=766 0243: dt=0.007000, rms=0.506 (0.072%), neg=0, invalid=766 0244: dt=0.007000, rms=0.506 (0.078%), neg=0, invalid=766 0245: dt=0.007000, rms=0.505 (0.079%), neg=0, invalid=766 0246: dt=0.007000, rms=0.505 (0.081%), neg=0, invalid=766 0247: dt=0.007000, rms=0.504 (0.082%), neg=0, invalid=766 0248: dt=0.007000, rms=0.504 (0.081%), neg=0, invalid=766 0249: dt=0.007000, rms=0.504 (0.078%), neg=0, invalid=766 0250: dt=0.007000, rms=0.503 (0.074%), neg=0, invalid=766 0251: dt=0.007000, rms=0.503 (0.070%), neg=0, invalid=766 0252: dt=0.007000, rms=0.503 (0.067%), neg=0, invalid=766 0253: dt=0.007000, rms=0.502 (0.061%), neg=0, invalid=766 0254: dt=0.007000, rms=0.502 (0.057%), neg=0, invalid=766 0255: dt=0.007000, rms=0.502 (0.048%), neg=0, invalid=766 0256: dt=0.007000, rms=0.502 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=766 0257: dt=0.007000, rms=0.501 (0.039%), neg=0, invalid=766 0258: dt=0.007000, rms=0.501 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=766 0259: dt=0.007000, rms=0.501 (0.028%), neg=0, invalid=766 0260: dt=0.007000, rms=0.501 (0.024%), neg=0, invalid=766 0261: dt=0.007000, rms=0.501 (0.017%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 15324.657 ms 0262: dt=0.000000, rms=0.501 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ setting smoothness coefficient to 0.118 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.499, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20061.682 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 10 after 25 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 0 0263: dt=25.600000, rms=0.493 (1.036%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20038.377 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 21 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 1 starting rms=0.002, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10145.496 ms iter 1, dt=0.002565: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (60.767%) 0264: dt=38.400000, rms=0.489 (0.815%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20067.393 ms 0265: dt=11.200000, rms=0.489 (0.106%), neg=0, invalid=766 0266: dt=11.200000, rms=0.489 (0.076%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 13 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0267: dt=11.200000, rms=0.488 (0.132%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 5 after 31 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 0 0268: dt=11.200000, rms=0.487 (0.147%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 5 after 23 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 0 0269: dt=11.200000, rms=0.487 (0.096%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 31 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0270: dt=11.200000, rms=0.486 (0.105%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 4 after 50 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 0 0271: dt=11.200000, rms=0.486 (0.031%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20299.713 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 63 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0272: dt=9.600000, rms=0.486 (0.056%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20080.365 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 60 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0273: dt=2.800000, rms=0.486 (0.016%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10163.399 ms iter 1, dt=0.012000: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.003 (21.979%) 0274: dt=2.800000, rms=0.486 (0.009%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 6 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0275: dt=2.800000, rms=0.486 (0.007%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 4 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0276: dt=2.800000, rms=0.486 (0.011%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 6 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10163.031 ms iter 1, dt=0.012000: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.002 (16.005%) 0277: dt=2.800000, rms=0.485 (0.051%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 6 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0278: dt=2.800000, rms=0.485 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.485, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20048.438 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 28 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10168.243 ms iter 1, dt=0.000875: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.002 (31.226%) 0279: dt=38.400000, rms=0.479 (1.386%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20062.412 ms 0280: dt=11.200000, rms=0.477 (0.405%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20066.324 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 16 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10164.006 ms iter 1, dt=0.000875: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.002 (21.762%) 0281: dt=44.800000, rms=0.475 (0.366%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20054.801 ms 0282: dt=11.200000, rms=0.474 (0.225%), neg=0, invalid=766 0283: dt=11.200000, rms=0.473 (0.089%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 1 starting rms=0.002, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10173.412 ms iter 1, dt=0.000875: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.002 (11.615%) 0284: dt=11.200000, rms=0.473 (0.161%), neg=0, invalid=766 0285: dt=11.200000, rms=0.472 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=766 0286: dt=11.200000, rms=0.472 (0.110%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0287: dt=11.200000, rms=0.471 (0.131%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0288: dt=11.200000, rms=0.471 (0.139%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0289: dt=11.200000, rms=0.470 (0.142%), neg=0, invalid=766 0290: dt=11.200000, rms=0.469 (0.130%), neg=0, invalid=766 0291: dt=11.200000, rms=0.469 (0.100%), neg=0, invalid=766 0292: dt=11.200000, rms=0.468 (0.094%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20050.588 ms 0293: dt=11.200000, rms=0.468 (0.037%), neg=0, invalid=766 0294: dt=11.200000, rms=0.468 (0.042%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0295: dt=11.200000, rms=0.468 (0.048%), neg=0, invalid=766 0296: dt=11.200000, rms=0.468 (0.054%), neg=0, invalid=766 0297: dt=11.200000, rms=0.467 (0.037%), neg=0, invalid=766 0298: dt=11.200000, rms=0.467 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 5 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0299: dt=11.200000, rms=0.467 (0.058%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.400 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.472, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21223.826 ms 0300: dt=0.720000, rms=0.472 (-0.004%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.472, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21224.656 ms 0301: dt=4.480000, rms=0.472 (0.103%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21246.299 ms 0302: dt=4.032000, rms=0.471 (0.068%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0303: dt=4.032000, rms=0.471 (0.060%), neg=0, invalid=766 0304: dt=4.032000, rms=0.471 (-0.024%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 1.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.479, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20078.545 ms 0305: dt=0.000000, rms=0.479 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.479, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21224.766 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 5 after 7 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0306: dt=0.448000, rms=0.478 (0.038%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21276.988 ms 0307: dt=0.448000, rms=0.478 (0.033%), neg=0, invalid=766 0308: dt=0.448000, rms=0.478 (0.021%), neg=0, invalid=766 0309: dt=0.448000, rms=0.478 (-0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.468, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21220.201 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 494 after 17 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0310: dt=1.706236, rms=0.437 (6.508%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21211.727 ms 0311: dt=0.000375, rms=0.437 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=766 0312: dt=0.000375, rms=0.437 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.437, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21231.504 ms 0313: dt=0.006000, rms=0.437 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21233.189 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0314: dt=0.016000, rms=0.437 (0.008%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21206.533 ms 0315: dt=0.007000, rms=0.437 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0316: dt=0.007000, rms=0.437 (-0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.425, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21209.949 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 404 after 9 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0317: dt=0.921366, rms=0.415 (2.450%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21203.104 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0318: dt=0.000250, rms=0.415 (-0.036%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0319: dt=0.000250, rms=0.415 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 0320: dt=0.000250, rms=0.415 (-0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.415, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21201.479 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0321: dt=0.000438, rms=0.415 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21204.670 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 1 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0322: dt=0.000750, rms=0.415 (0.002%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21208.533 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 24 after 6 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0323: dt=0.080000, rms=0.414 (0.102%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21331.801 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0324: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.044%), neg=0, invalid=766 0325: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.010%), neg=0, invalid=766 0326: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.022%), neg=0, invalid=766 0327: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.029%), neg=0, invalid=766 0328: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.036%), neg=0, invalid=766 0329: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=766 0330: dt=0.007000, rms=0.414 (0.044%), neg=0, invalid=766 0331: dt=0.007000, rms=0.413 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=766 0332: dt=0.007000, rms=0.413 (0.041%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.412, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21344.609 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 172 after 19 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0333: dt=0.384000, rms=0.407 (1.062%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21189.543 ms 0334: dt=0.000438, rms=0.407 (-0.008%), neg=0, invalid=766 0335: dt=0.000438, rms=0.407 (0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0336: dt=0.000438, rms=0.407 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0337: dt=0.000438, rms=0.407 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.407, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21199.100 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 6 after 7 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0338: dt=0.006000, rms=0.407 (0.021%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21196.271 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 258 after 29 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 0 0339: dt=0.513423, rms=0.400 (1.654%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21240.098 ms 0340: dt=0.000438, rms=0.400 (0.010%), neg=0, invalid=766 0341: dt=0.000438, rms=0.400 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0342: dt=0.000438, rms=0.400 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0343: dt=0.000438, rms=0.400 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 0344: dt=0.000438, rms=0.400 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21223.197 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 5 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0345: dt=0.020000, rms=0.400 (0.004%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21279.004 ms 0346: dt=0.000312, rms=0.400 (-0.001%), neg=0, invalid=766 label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) ***************** morphing with label term set to 0 ******************************* label assignment complete, 0 changed (0.00%) **************** pass 1 of 1 ************************ setting smoothness coefficient to 0.118 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.400, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20922.516 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 10 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0347: dt=1.600000, rms=0.400 (-0.107%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.400, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19814.963 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 14 after 64 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 0 0348: dt=11.200000, rms=0.399 (0.178%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19736.328 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 20 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 2 starting rms=0.003, neg=2, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9679.737 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 0, old_neg 2, delta 2, rms=0.001 (68.375%) 0349: dt=9.600000, rms=0.399 (0.064%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 13 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.004, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9780.616 ms iter 1, dt=0.000031: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (67.493%) 0350: dt=9.600000, rms=0.399 (0.022%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 5 after 0 iterations, nbhd size=0, neg = 0 0351: dt=9.600000, rms=0.399 (0.091%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 29 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 1 starting rms=0.005, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9662.394 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (67.965%) 0352: dt=9.600000, rms=0.398 (0.046%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 4 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 2 starting rms=0.005, neg=2, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9888.115 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 0, old_neg 2, delta 2, rms=0.001 (74.704%) 0353: dt=9.600000, rms=0.398 (0.066%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 9 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 3 starting rms=0.006, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9944.082 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 2, old_neg 3, delta 1, rms=0.001 (74.921%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10566.492 ms iter 2, dt=0.000123: new neg 0, old_neg 2, delta 2, rms=0.001 (33.651%) 0354: dt=9.600000, rms=0.398 (0.042%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 0.400 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.398, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21158.449 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 5 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9620.274 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.001 (57.352%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10205.049 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (31.802%) 0355: dt=1.008000, rms=0.398 (0.049%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20820.971 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 2 starting rms=0.005, neg=2, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9646.515 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 2, delta 1, rms=0.001 (69.763%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10239.717 ms iter 2, dt=0.000102: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (36.774%) 0356: dt=1.008000, rms=0.398 (0.043%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 3 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9686.620 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.002 (50.237%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9925.024 ms iter 2, dt=0.000036: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (31.820%) 0357: dt=1.008000, rms=0.398 (0.020%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 14 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9619.393 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 2, old_neg 1, delta -1, rms=0.002 (47.272%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9653.826 ms iter 2, dt=0.000015: new neg 0, old_neg 2, delta 2, rms=0.001 (39.599%) 0358: dt=1.008000, rms=0.398 (-0.044%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.398, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21131.070 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 60 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 2 starting rms=0.005, neg=2, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10067.261 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 2, delta 1, rms=0.002 (65.150%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10663.825 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (42.667%) 0359: dt=3.600000, rms=0.397 (0.261%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21253.229 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 46 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 2 starting rms=0.005, neg=2, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10178.256 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 2, old_neg 2, delta 0, rms=0.002 (58.999%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9636.822 ms iter 2, dt=0.000026: new neg 0, old_neg 2, delta 2, rms=0.001 (25.654%) 0360: dt=4.545455, rms=0.396 (0.227%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 77 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9685.419 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (65.195%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10192.070 ms iter 2, dt=0.000410: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (38.759%) 0361: dt=4.545455, rms=0.396 (0.032%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 49 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9700.538 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (65.022%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10256.214 ms iter 2, dt=0.000036: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (31.400%) 0362: dt=4.545455, rms=0.394 (0.311%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 60 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 4 starting rms=0.006, neg=4, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10036.080 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 4, delta 3, rms=0.002 (69.825%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10397.242 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (43.145%) 0363: dt=4.545455, rms=0.394 (0.091%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 43 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9679.972 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (66.115%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9641.566 ms iter 2, dt=0.000036: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (37.091%) 0364: dt=4.545455, rms=0.394 (0.099%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 42 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9682.747 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 2, old_neg 3, delta 1, rms=0.002 (60.886%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9658.813 ms iter 2, dt=0.000020: new neg 0, old_neg 2, delta 2, rms=0.001 (29.753%) 0365: dt=4.545455, rms=0.393 (0.107%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 68 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10135.026 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (66.350%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10808.711 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (38.412%) 0366: dt=4.545455, rms=0.393 (0.034%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21125.455 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 22 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9733.061 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (67.625%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10283.318 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (43.241%) 0367: dt=4.032000, rms=0.393 (0.100%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21072.152 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 18 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11054.882 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (68.128%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11048.119 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (39.165%) 0368: dt=3.456000, rms=0.393 (0.052%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 17 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10211.322 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (67.770%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11343.309 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (38.893%) 0369: dt=3.456000, rms=0.392 (0.056%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 19 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10687.813 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (68.670%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11889.494 ms iter 2, dt=0.000102: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (38.812%) 0370: dt=3.456000, rms=0.392 (0.034%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 13 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 3 starting rms=0.005, neg=3, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9936.977 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 3, delta 2, rms=0.002 (66.603%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9709.391 ms iter 2, dt=0.000036: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (34.520%) 0371: dt=3.456000, rms=0.392 (0.045%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 14 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9723.209 ms iter 1, dt=0.000023: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.002 (51.086%) gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 10209.929 ms iter 2, dt=0.000143: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (38.891%) 0372: dt=3.456000, rms=0.392 (0.005%), neg=0, invalid=766 setting smoothness coefficient to 1.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.394, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 19876.596 ms 0373: dt=0.000000, rms=0.394 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.394, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21045.520 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 6 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 1 starting rms=0.003, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9793.433 ms iter 1, dt=0.000031: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (71.466%) 0374: dt=0.384000, rms=0.393 (0.011%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21152.420 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 6 after 14 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0375: dt=0.384000, rms=0.393 (0.030%), neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21117.049 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 6 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0376: dt=0.080357, rms=0.393 (0.006%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 1 after 5 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0377: dt=0.080357, rms=0.393 (0.006%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 2 after 6 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 0 0378: dt=0.080357, rms=0.393 (0.011%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 9 after 16 iterations, nbhd size=2, neg = 0 0379: dt=0.080357, rms=0.393 (0.011%), neg=0, invalid=766 iter 0, gcam->neg = 9 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=1, neg = 1 starting rms=0.002, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 12367.717 ms iter 1, dt=0.000030: new neg 0, old_neg 1, delta 1, rms=0.001 (69.664%) 0380: dt=0.080357, rms=0.393 (-0.008%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.391, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20942.182 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 48 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.002, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9760.223 ms iter 1, dt=0.000000: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.002 (0.000%) ---------- unfolding failed - restoring original position -------------------- 0381: dt=0.096000, rms=0.391 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.391, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21283.857 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 157 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 1 starting rms=0.004, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9925.364 ms iter 1, dt=0.000000: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.004 (-0.000%) ---------- unfolding failed - restoring original position -------------------- 0382: dt=0.192000, rms=0.391 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.391, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21820.035 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 48 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.002, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9961.807 ms iter 1, dt=0.000000: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.002 (0.000%) ---------- unfolding failed - restoring original position -------------------- 0383: dt=0.096000, rms=0.391 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.391, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21086.656 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 157 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 1 starting rms=0.004, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9682.750 ms iter 1, dt=0.000000: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.004 (0.000%) ---------- unfolding failed - restoring original position -------------------- 0384: dt=0.192000, rms=0.391 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 resetting metric properties... setting smoothness coefficient to 2.000 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=2.000... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.391, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 20826.953 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 48 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=4, neg = 1 starting rms=0.002, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 9762.127 ms iter 1, dt=0.000000: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.002 (0.000%) ---------- unfolding failed - restoring original position -------------------- 0385: dt=0.096000, rms=0.391 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 blurring input image with Gaussian with sigma=0.500... 0000: dt=0.000, rms=0.391, neg=0, invalid=766 gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 21788.850 ms iter 0, gcam->neg = 157 after 200 iterations, nbhd size=3, neg = 1 starting rms=0.004, neg=1, removing folds in lattice.... gcamFindOptimalTimeStep: Complete in 11164.339 ms iter 1, dt=0.000000: new neg 1, old_neg 1, delta 0, rms=0.004 (0.000%) ---------- unfolding failed - restoring original position -------------------- 0386: dt=0.192000, rms=0.391 (0.000%), neg=0, invalid=766 writing output transformation to transforms/talairach.m3z... GCAMwrite GCAMwrite:: m3z loop GCAMwrite:: the command is: gzip -f -c > transforms/talairach.m3z registration took 2 hours, 39 minutes and 0 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# CA Reg Inv Wed Jan 11 14:17:00 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_ca_register -invert-and-save transforms/talairach.m3z Loading, Inverting, Saving, Exiting ... Reading transforms/talairach.m3z zcat transforms/talairach.m3z Inverting GCAM Saving inverse #-------------------------------------- #@# Remove Neck Wed Jan 11 14:17:41 GMT 2012 mri_remove_neck -radius 25 nu.mgz transforms/talairach.m3z /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca nu_noneck.mgz erasing everything more than 25 mm from possible brain reading atlas '/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca'... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 reading input volume 'nu.mgz'... reading transform 'transforms/talairach.m3z'... zcat transforms/talairach.m3z removing structures at least 25 mm from brain... 10301611 nonbrain voxels erased writing output to nu_noneck.mgz... nonbrain removal took 0 minutes and 45 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# SkullLTA Wed Jan 11 14:18:27 GMT 2012 mri_em_register -skull -t transforms/talairach.lta nu_noneck.mgz /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta aligning to atlas containing skull, setting unknown_nbr_spacing = 5 using previously computed transform transforms/talairach.lta reading 1 input volumes... logging results to talairach_with_skull.log reading '/home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_withskull_2008-03-26.gca'... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 average std = 23.1 using min determinant for regularization = 53.4 0 singular and 5702 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized reading 'nu_noneck.mgz'... freeing gibbs priors...done. bounding unknown intensity as < 20.2 or > 943.7 total sample mean = 92.0 (1443 zeros) ************************************************ spacing=8, using 3481 sample points, tol=1.00e-05... ************************************************ register_mri: find_optimal_transform find_optimal_transform: nsamples 3481, passno 0, spacing 8 resetting wm mean[0]: 117 --> 126 resetting gm mean[0]: 74 --> 74 input volume #1 is the most T1-like using real data threshold=5.0 skull bounding box = (40, 19, 14) --> (215, 204, 233) using (98, 81, 124) as brain centroid... mean wm in atlas = 126, using box (76,58,97) --> (119, 103,151) to find MRI wm before smoothing, mri peak at 108 after smoothing, mri peak at 107, scaling input intensities by 1.178 scaling channel 0 by 1.17757 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 0 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-10335.7, old_max_log_p =-10381.5 (thresh=-10371.1) 0.969 0.057 0.002 -3.165; -0.047 1.177 -0.025 11.629; 0.008 0.050 0.878 -0.623; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 1 nscales = 0 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 1.000: max_log_p=-10334.9, old_max_log_p =-10335.7 (thresh=-10325.3) 1.115 0.066 0.002 -22.504; -0.051 1.265 -0.027 3.417; 0.008 0.050 0.878 -0.623; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reducing scale to 0.2500 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 2 nscales = 1 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.250: max_log_p=-10324.7, old_max_log_p =-10334.9 (thresh=-10324.6) 1.133 -0.021 -0.053 -11.638; 0.025 1.315 -0.004 -11.755; 0.073 0.009 0.828 -0.957; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reducing scale to 0.0625 **************************************** Nine parameter search. iteration 3 nscales = 2 ... **************************************** Result so far: scale 0.062: max_log_p=-10316.1, old_max_log_p =-10324.7 (thresh=-10314.4) 1.136 0.012 -0.039 -15.852; -0.002 1.314 0.003 -7.977; 0.054 -0.001 0.828 3.350; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; min search scale 0.025000 reached *********************************************** Computing MAP estimate using 3481 samples... *********************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-05 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 1.13560 0.01209 -0.03915 -15.85244; -0.00221 1.31350 0.00319 -7.97653; 0.05426 -0.00074 0.82767 3.35013; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 3481 Quasinewton: input matrix 1.13560 0.01209 -0.03915 -15.85244; -0.00221 1.31350 0.00319 -7.97653; 0.05426 -0.00074 0.82767 3.35013; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 005: -log(p) = 10316.1 tol 0.000010 Resulting transform: 1.136 0.012 -0.039 -15.852; -0.002 1.314 0.003 -7.977; 0.054 -0.001 0.828 3.350; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; pass 1, spacing 8: log(p) = -10316.1 (old=-10381.5) transform before final EM align: 1.136 0.012 -0.039 -15.852; -0.002 1.314 0.003 -7.977; 0.054 -0.001 0.828 3.350; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; ************************************************** EM alignment process ... Computing final MAP estimate using 382743 samples. ************************************************** dt = 5.00e-06, momentum=0.80, tol=1.00e-07 l_intensity = 1.0000 Aligning input volume to GCA... Transform matrix 1.13560 0.01209 -0.03915 -15.85244; -0.00221 1.31350 0.00319 -7.97653; 0.05426 -0.00074 0.82767 3.35013; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; nsamples 382743 Quasinewton: input matrix 1.13560 0.01209 -0.03915 -15.85244; -0.00221 1.31350 0.00319 -7.97653; 0.05426 -0.00074 0.82767 3.35013; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 1.00000; dfp_em_step_func: 006: -log(p) = 1145712.2 after pass:transform: ( 1.13, 0.01, -0.04, -15.85) ( -0.01, 1.30, -0.00, -7.98) ( 0.05, 0.00, 0.83, 3.35) IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESpass 2 through quasi-newton minimization... IFLAG= -1 LINE SEARCH FAILED. SEE DOCUMENTATION OF ROUTINE MCSRCH ERROR RETURN OF LINE SEARCH: INFO= 3 POSSIBLE CAUSES: FUNCTION OR GRADIENT ARE INCORRECT OR INCORRECT TOLERANCESoutof QuasiNewtonEMA: 008: -log(p) = 1145712.2 tol 0.000000 final transform: 1.132 0.012 -0.040 -15.852; -0.010 1.302 -0.003 -7.977; 0.055 0.000 0.830 3.350; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; writing output transformation to transforms/talairach_with_skull.lta... registration took 13 minutes and 12 seconds. #-------------------------------------- #@# SubCort Seg Wed Jan 11 14:31:39 GMT 2012 mri_ca_label -align -nobigventricles norm.mgz transforms/talairach.m3z /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz renormalizing sequences with structure alignment, equivalent to: -renormalize -renormalize_mean 0.500 -regularize 0.500 not handling expanded ventricles... reading 1 input volumes... reading classifier array from /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca... gcaAllocMax: node dims 64 64 64 gcaAllocMax: prior dims 128 128 128 gcaAllocMax: max_labels 0 reading input volume from norm.mgz... average std[0] = 6.9 reading transform from transforms/talairach.m3z... zcat transforms/talairach.m3z Atlas used for the 3D morph was /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/average/RB_all_2008-03-26.gca average std = 6.9 using min determinant for regularization = 4.7 0 singular and 0 ill-conditioned covariance matrices regularized labeling volume... renormalizing by structure alignment.... renormalizing input #0 gca peak = 0.15151 (27) mri peak = 0.12100 (32) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (1028 voxels, overlap=0.688) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (1028 voxels, peak = 31), gca=31.0 gca peak = 0.14982 (20) mri peak = 0.12946 (30) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.33 x + 0.0 (3207 voxels, overlap=0.476) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.33 x + 0.0 (3207 voxels, peak = 26), gca=26.5 gca peak = 0.28003 (97) mri peak = 0.10726 (96) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 0.95 x + 0.0 (445 voxels, overlap=1.000) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 0.95 x + 0.0 (445 voxels, peak = 92), gca=92.2 gca peak = 0.18160 (96) mri peak = 0.10913 (98) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (449 voxels, overlap=1.000) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (449 voxels, peak = 96), gca=96.0 gca peak = 0.27536 (62) mri peak = 0.08260 (75) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (806 voxels, overlap=0.140) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (806 voxels, peak = 74), gca=74.4 gca peak = 0.32745 (63) mri peak = 0.09659 (80) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (775 voxels, overlap=0.001) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (775 voxels, peak = 76), gca=75.6 gca peak = 0.08597 (105) mri peak = 0.09182 (107) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (86108 voxels, overlap=0.743) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (86108 voxels, peak = 108), gca=107.6 gca peak = 0.09209 (106) mri peak = 0.07619 (107) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (80883 voxels, overlap=0.743) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (80883 voxels, peak = 106), gca=106.0 gca peak = 0.07826 (63) mri peak = 0.04627 (83) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (60908 voxels, overlap=0.038) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.30 x + 0.0 (60908 voxels, peak = 82), gca=81.9 gca peak = 0.08598 (64) mri peak = 0.04805 (88) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.33 x + 0.0 (56066 voxels, overlap=0.006) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.33 x + 0.0 (56066 voxels, peak = 85), gca=84.8 gca peak = 0.24164 (71) mri peak = 0.10496 (86) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.17 x + 0.0 (865 voxels, overlap=0.000) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.17 x + 0.0 (865 voxels, peak = 83), gca=83.4 gca peak = 0.18227 (75) mri peak = 0.10411 (85) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (778 voxels, overlap=0.567) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 1.10 x + 0.0 (778 voxels, peak = 82), gca=82.5 gca peak = 0.10629 (62) mri peak = 0.06036 (74) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (31135 voxels, overlap=0.073) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (31135 voxels, peak = 76), gca=76.0 gca peak = 0.11668 (59) mri peak = 0.06422 (75) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (30355 voxels, overlap=0.041) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (30355 voxels, peak = 72), gca=72.3 gca peak = 0.17849 (88) mri peak = 0.09465 (91) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (7696 voxels, overlap=0.959) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (7696 voxels, peak = 90), gca=90.2 gca peak = 0.16819 (86) mri peak = 0.09163 (88) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (7694 voxels, overlap=0.972) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (7694 voxels, peak = 88), gca=88.2 gca peak = 0.41688 (64) mri peak = 0.09761 (79) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (461 voxels, overlap=0.001) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.23 x + 0.0 (461 voxels, peak = 78), gca=78.4 gca peak = 0.42394 (62) mri peak = 0.09868 (77) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (563 voxels, overlap=0.000) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.20 x + 0.0 (563 voxels, peak = 74), gca=74.4 gca peak = 0.10041 (96) mri peak = 0.07359 (95) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (5089 voxels, overlap=0.957) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (5089 voxels, peak = 96), gca=96.0 gca peak = 0.13978 (88) mri peak = 0.07157 (93) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (5395 voxels, overlap=0.872) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.05 x + 0.0 (5395 voxels, peak = 92), gca=92.4 gca peak = 0.08514 (81) mri peak = 0.08465 (88) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (2526 voxels, overlap=0.667) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (2526 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.1 gca peak = 0.09624 (82) mri peak = 0.07615 (88) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (2475 voxels, overlap=0.634) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (2475 voxels, peak = 88), gca=88.2 gca peak = 0.07543 (88) mri peak = 0.07151 (89) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (15949 voxels, overlap=0.765) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (15949 voxels, peak = 90), gca=90.2 gca peak = 0.12757 (95) mri peak = 0.08047 (95) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (1556 voxels, overlap=0.767) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (1556 voxels, peak = 97), gca=97.4 gca peak = 0.17004 (92) mri peak = 0.08440 (96) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1669 voxels, overlap=0.887) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1669 voxels, peak = 92), gca=92.0 gca peak = 0.21361 (36) mri peak = 0.16290 (32) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 0.85 x + 0.0 (108 voxels, overlap=0.717) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 0.85 x + 0.0 (108 voxels, peak = 31), gca=30.6 gca peak = 0.26069 (23) mri peak = 0.12316 (26) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (283 voxels, overlap=0.842) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 1.15 x + 0.0 (283 voxels, peak = 26), gca=26.4 gca peak Unknown = 0.94427 ( 0) gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.31795 (35) gca peak CSF = 0.14367 (38) gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.57033 (70) gca peak Left_undetermined = 1.00000 (35) gca peak Left_vessel = 0.65201 (62) gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.09084 (48) gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.31129 (32) gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.30219 (72) gca peak Right_vessel = 0.83418 (60) gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.10189 (48) gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.72939 (42) gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.14821 (82) gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.10354 (53) gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.34849 (76) not using caudate to estimate GM means estimating mean gm scale to be 1.24 x + 0.0 estimating mean wm scale to be 1.01 x + 0.0 estimating mean csf scale to be 1.12 x + 0.0 saving intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt renormalizing by structure alignment.... renormalizing input #0 gca peak = 0.11716 (31) mri peak = 0.12100 (32) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1028 voxels, overlap=0.901) Left_Lateral_Ventricle (4): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1028 voxels, peak = 31), gca=31.0 gca peak = 0.14751 (27) mri peak = 0.12946 (30) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (3207 voxels, overlap=0.807) Right_Lateral_Ventricle (43): linear fit = 1.08 x + 0.0 (3207 voxels, peak = 29), gca=29.0 gca peak = 0.25643 (93) mri peak = 0.10726 (96) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (445 voxels, overlap=1.000) Right_Pallidum (52): linear fit = 1.02 x + 0.0 (445 voxels, peak = 95), gca=95.3 gca peak = 0.18193 (96) mri peak = 0.10913 (98) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (449 voxels, overlap=1.000) Left_Pallidum (13): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (449 voxels, peak = 96), gca=96.0 gca peak = 0.23266 (75) mri peak = 0.08260 (75) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (806 voxels, overlap=0.992) Right_Hippocampus (53): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (806 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.1 gca peak = 0.26006 (76) mri peak = 0.09659 (80) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (775 voxels, overlap=0.999) Left_Hippocampus (17): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (775 voxels, peak = 74), gca=74.1 gca peak = 0.08360 (108) mri peak = 0.09182 (107) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (86108 voxels, overlap=0.789) Right_Cerebral_White_Matter (41): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (86108 voxels, peak = 108), gca=108.0 gca peak = 0.09206 (106) mri peak = 0.07619 (107) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (80883 voxels, overlap=0.743) Left_Cerebral_White_Matter (2): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (80883 voxels, peak = 106), gca=106.0 gca peak = 0.05847 (82) mri peak = 0.04627 (83) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (60908 voxels, overlap=0.928) Left_Cerebral_Cortex (3): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (60908 voxels, peak = 82), gca=82.0 gca peak = 0.06460 (84) mri peak = 0.04805 (88) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (56066 voxels, overlap=0.910) Right_Cerebral_Cortex (42): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (56066 voxels, peak = 84), gca=84.0 gca peak = 0.21546 (83) mri peak = 0.10496 (86) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (865 voxels, overlap=1.000) Right_Caudate (50): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (865 voxels, peak = 83), gca=83.0 gca peak = 0.13752 (82) mri peak = 0.10411 (85) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (778 voxels, overlap=0.863) Left_Caudate (11): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (778 voxels, peak = 80), gca=80.0 gca peak = 0.08915 (76) mri peak = 0.06036 (74) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (31135 voxels, overlap=0.973) Left_Cerebellum_Cortex (8): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (31135 voxels, peak = 76), gca=76.0 gca peak = 0.10444 (73) mri peak = 0.06422 (75) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (30355 voxels, overlap=0.970) Right_Cerebellum_Cortex (47): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (30355 voxels, peak = 73), gca=73.0 gca peak = 0.16674 (89) mri peak = 0.09465 (91) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (7696 voxels, overlap=0.990) Left_Cerebellum_White_Matter (7): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (7696 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.0 gca peak = 0.14598 (89) mri peak = 0.09163 (88) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (7694 voxels, overlap=0.996) Right_Cerebellum_White_Matter (46): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (7694 voxels, peak = 89), gca=89.0 gca peak = 0.32081 (78) mri peak = 0.09761 (79) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (461 voxels, overlap=1.000) Left_Amygdala (18): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (461 voxels, peak = 78), gca=78.0 gca peak = 0.32996 (74) mri peak = 0.09868 (77) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (563 voxels, overlap=0.998) Right_Amygdala (54): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (563 voxels, peak = 74), gca=74.0 gca peak = 0.10049 (96) mri peak = 0.07359 (95) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (5089 voxels, overlap=0.957) Left_Thalamus_Proper (10): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (5089 voxels, peak = 96), gca=96.0 gca peak = 0.11293 (92) mri peak = 0.07157 (93) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (5395 voxels, overlap=0.993) Right_Thalamus_Proper (49): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (5395 voxels, peak = 92), gca=92.0 gca peak = 0.08504 (87) mri peak = 0.08465 (88) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2526 voxels, overlap=0.932) Left_Putamen (12): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2526 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.0 gca peak = 0.09708 (88) mri peak = 0.07615 (88) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2475 voxels, overlap=0.947) Right_Putamen (51): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (2475 voxels, peak = 88), gca=88.0 gca peak = 0.07236 (87) mri peak = 0.07151 (89) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (15949 voxels, overlap=0.815) Brain_Stem (16): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (15949 voxels, peak = 87), gca=87.0 gca peak = 0.14554 (97) mri peak = 0.08047 (95) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1556 voxels, overlap=0.803) Right_VentralDC (60): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1556 voxels, peak = 97), gca=97.0 gca peak = 0.17369 (92) mri peak = 0.08440 (96) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1669 voxels, overlap=0.887) Left_VentralDC (28): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (1669 voxels, peak = 92), gca=92.0 gca peak = 0.22917 (32) mri peak = 0.16290 (32) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (108 voxels, overlap=0.910) Third_Ventricle (14): linear fit = 1.00 x + 0.0 (108 voxels, peak = 32), gca=32.0 gca peak = 0.20195 (27) mri peak = 0.12316 (26) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (283 voxels, overlap=0.784) Fourth_Ventricle (15): linear fit = 0.98 x + 0.0 (283 voxels, peak = 26), gca=26.3 gca peak Unknown = 0.94427 ( 0) gca peak Left_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.26961 (42) gca peak CSF = 0.22950 (51) gca peak Left_Accumbens_area = 0.51271 (77) gca peak Left_undetermined = 0.95107 (36) gca peak Left_vessel = 0.63670 (62) gca peak Left_choroid_plexus = 0.09084 (48) gca peak Right_Inf_Lat_Vent = 0.28322 (38) gca peak Right_Accumbens_area = 0.25853 (86) gca peak Right_vessel = 0.83418 (60) gca peak Right_choroid_plexus = 0.10189 (48) gca peak Fifth_Ventricle = 0.68165 (47) gca peak WM_hypointensities = 0.14431 (83) gca peak non_WM_hypointensities = 0.09346 (54) gca peak Optic_Chiasm = 0.34131 (76) not using caudate to estimate GM means estimating mean gm scale to be 0.99 x + 0.0 estimating mean wm scale to be 1.00 x + 0.0 estimating mean csf scale to be 1.01 x + 0.0 saving intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt saving sequentially combined intensity scales to aseg.auto_noCCseg.label_intensities.txt 96031 gm and wm labels changed (%24 to gray, %76 to white out of all changed labels) 625 hippocampal voxels changed. 0 amygdala voxels changed. pass 1: 135536 changed. image ll: -2.421, PF=1.000 pass 2: 26870 changed. image ll: -2.415, PF=1.000 pass 3: 9315 changed. pass 4: 3754 changed. writing labeled volume to aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz... auto-labeling took 11 minutes and 52 seconds. mri_cc -aseg aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz -o aseg.auto.mgz -lta /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/transforms/cc_up.lta subject_1010 will read input aseg from aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz writing aseg with cc labels to aseg.auto.mgz will write lta as /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/transforms/cc_up.lta reading aseg from /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz reading norm from /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/norm.mgz 46932 voxels in left wm, 59119 in right wm, xrange [124, 133] searching rotation angles z=[-9 5], y=[-8 6] searching scale 1 Z rot -9.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -9.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -9.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -8.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -8.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -8.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -8.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -7.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -7.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -7.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -7.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -6.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -6.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -6.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -6.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -5.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -5.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -5.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -5.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -4.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -4.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -4.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -4.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -3.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -2.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.2 searching scale 1 Z rot -1.0 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.7 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.5 searching scale 1 Z rot -0.2 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.0 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.3 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.5 searching scale 1 Z rot 0.8 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.0 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.3 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.5 searching scale 1 Z rot 1.8 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.0 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.3 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.5 searching scale 1 Z rot 2.8 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.0 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.3 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.5 searching scale 1 Z rot 3.8 searching scale 1 Z rot 4.0 searching scale 1 Z rot 4.3 global minimum found at slice 128.4, rotations (-1.28, -2.47) final transformation (x=128.4, yr=-1.284, zr=-2.472): 0.999 0.043 -0.022 -1.070; -0.043 0.999 0.001 50.495; 0.022 -0.000 1.000 1.153; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; updating x range to be [126, 131] in xformed coordinates best xformed slice 129 cc center is found at 129 149 142 eigenvectors: -0.001 -0.000 1.000; 0.041 -0.999 -0.000; 0.999 0.041 0.001; writing aseg with callosum to /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri/aseg.auto.mgz... corpus callosum matter segmentation took 0.6 minutes #-------------------------------------- #@# Merge ASeg Wed Jan 11 14:44:08 GMT 2012 cp aseg.auto.mgz aseg.mgz #-------------------------------------------- #@# Intensity Normalization2 Wed Jan 11 14:44:08 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_normalize -aseg aseg.mgz -mask brainmask.mgz -b 20 -n 5 norm.mgz brain.mgz using segmentation for initial intensity normalization using control point with intensity 20.0 below target. performing 3d normalization 5 times reading from norm.mgz... normalizing image... removing outliers in the aseg WM... 165 control points removed building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 1 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 2 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 3 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 4 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... 3d normalization pass 5 of 5 building Voronoi diagram... performing soap bubble smoothing... writing output to brain.mgz 3D bias adjustment took 4 minutes and 5 seconds. using MR volume brainmask.mgz to mask input volume... white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 38 (38) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 43 (43) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 43 (43) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 43 (43) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 white matter peak found at 111 white matter peak found at 110 gm peak at 88 (88), valley at 43 (43) csf peak at 46, setting threshold to 74 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Mask BFS Wed Jan 11 14:48:15 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_mask -T 5 brain.mgz brainmask.mgz brain.finalsurfs.mgz threshold mask volume at 5 DoAbs = 0 Found 2027432 voxels in mask Writing masked volume to brain.finalsurfs.mgz...done. #-------------------------------------------- #@# WM Segmentation Wed Jan 11 14:48:16 GMT 2012 mri_segment brain.mgz wm.seg.mgz doing initial intensity segmentation... using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels... computing class statistics for intensity windows... WM (106.0): 106.5 +- 5.8 [80.0 --> 125.0] GM (75.0) : 71.9 +- 15.5 [30.0 --> 96.0] setting bottom of white matter range to 87.4 setting top of gray matter range to 102.8 doing initial intensity segmentation... using local statistics to label ambiguous voxels... using local geometry to label remaining ambiguous voxels... reclassifying voxels using Gaussian border classifier... removing voxels with positive offset direction... smoothing T1 volume with sigma = 0.250 removing 1-dimensional structures... 23946 sparsely connected voxels removed... thickening thin strands.... 20 segments, 4000 filled 11944 bright non-wm voxels segmented. 16847 diagonally connected voxels added... white matter segmentation took 1.9 minutes writing output to wm.seg.mgz... mri_edit_wm_with_aseg -keep-in wm.seg.mgz brain.mgz aseg.mgz wm.asegedit.mgz preserving editing changes in input volume... auto filling took 0.30 minutes reading wm segmentation from wm.seg.mgz... 216 voxels added to wm to prevent paths from MTL structures to cortex 2612 additional wm voxels added 0 additional wm voxels added SEG EDIT: 47472 voxels turned on, 108563 voxels turned off. propagating editing to output volume from wm.seg.mgz 115,126,128 old 0 new 0 115,126,128 old 0 new 0 writing edited volume to wm.asegedit.mgz.... mri_pretess wm.asegedit.mgz wm norm.mgz wm.mgz Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (xy+): 57 found - 57 modified | TOTAL: 57 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 57 modified | TOTAL: 57 pass 1 (xy-): 68 found - 68 modified | TOTAL: 125 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 68 modified | TOTAL: 125 pass 1 (yz+): 48 found - 48 modified | TOTAL: 173 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 48 modified | TOTAL: 173 pass 1 (yz-): 65 found - 65 modified | TOTAL: 238 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 65 modified | TOTAL: 238 pass 1 (xz+): 65 found - 65 modified | TOTAL: 303 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 65 modified | TOTAL: 303 pass 1 (xz-): 69 found - 69 modified | TOTAL: 372 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 69 modified | TOTAL: 372 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (+++): 107 found - 107 modified | TOTAL: 107 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 107 modified | TOTAL: 107 pass 1 (+++): 92 found - 92 modified | TOTAL: 199 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 92 modified | TOTAL: 199 pass 1 (+++): 108 found - 108 modified | TOTAL: 307 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 108 modified | TOTAL: 307 pass 1 (+++): 135 found - 135 modified | TOTAL: 442 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 135 modified | TOTAL: 442 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (++): 337 found - 337 modified | TOTAL: 337 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 337 modified | TOTAL: 337 pass 1 (+-): 382 found - 382 modified | TOTAL: 719 pass 2 (+-): 1 found - 383 modified | TOTAL: 720 pass 3 (+-): 0 found - 383 modified | TOTAL: 720 pass 1 (--): 297 found - 297 modified | TOTAL: 1017 pass 2 (--): 1 found - 298 modified | TOTAL: 1018 pass 3 (--): 0 found - 298 modified | TOTAL: 1018 pass 1 (-+): 343 found - 343 modified | TOTAL: 1361 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 343 modified | TOTAL: 1361 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (xy+): 41 found - 41 modified | TOTAL: 41 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 41 modified | TOTAL: 41 pass 1 (xy-): 45 found - 45 modified | TOTAL: 86 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 45 modified | TOTAL: 86 pass 1 (yz+): 48 found - 48 modified | TOTAL: 134 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 48 modified | TOTAL: 134 pass 1 (yz-): 41 found - 41 modified | TOTAL: 175 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 41 modified | TOTAL: 175 pass 1 (xz+): 55 found - 55 modified | TOTAL: 230 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 55 modified | TOTAL: 230 pass 1 (xz-): 39 found - 39 modified | TOTAL: 269 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 39 modified | TOTAL: 269 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (+++): 6 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 6 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 6 modified | TOTAL: 6 pass 1 (+++): 14 found - 14 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 14 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 1 (+++): 9 found - 9 modified | TOTAL: 29 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 9 modified | TOTAL: 29 pass 1 (+++): 8 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 37 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 37 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (++): 19 found - 19 modified | TOTAL: 19 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 19 modified | TOTAL: 19 pass 1 (+-): 32 found - 32 modified | TOTAL: 51 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 32 modified | TOTAL: 51 pass 1 (--): 23 found - 23 modified | TOTAL: 74 pass 2 (--): 0 found - 23 modified | TOTAL: 74 pass 1 (-+): 22 found - 22 modified | TOTAL: 96 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 22 modified | TOTAL: 96 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (xy+): 8 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 8 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 8 pass 1 (xy-): 4 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 12 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 12 pass 1 (yz+): 8 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 8 modified | TOTAL: 20 pass 1 (yz-): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 23 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 23 pass 1 (xz+): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 26 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 26 pass 1 (xz-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 27 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 27 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (+++): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 2 (+++): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 2 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (++): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 3 pass 1 (+-): 4 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 7 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 7 pass 1 (--): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 8 pass 2 (--): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 8 pass 1 (-+): 4 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 12 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 4 modified | TOTAL: 12 Iteration Number : 4 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 4 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 4 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Total Number of Modified Voxels = 2618 (out of 848637: 0.308495) binarizing input wm segmentation... Ambiguous edge configurations... mri_pretess done #-------------------------------------------- #@# Fill Wed Jan 11 14:50:35 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/mri mri_fill -a ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log -xform transforms/talairach.lta -segmentation aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz wm.mgz filled.mgz logging cutting plane coordinates to ../scripts/ponscc.cut.log... INFO: Using transforms/talairach.lta and its offset for Talairach volume ... using segmentation aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz... reading input volume...done. searching for cutting planes...voxel to talairach voxel transform 0.969 0.057 0.002 -3.166; -0.043 1.102 0.076 6.964; 0.014 -0.117 0.874 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; voxel to talairach voxel transform 0.969 0.057 0.002 -3.166; -0.043 1.102 0.076 6.964; 0.014 -0.117 0.874 15.739; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; reading segmented volume aseg.auto_noCCseg.mgz... Looking for area (min, max) = (350, 1400) area[0] = 2616 (min = 350, max = 1400), aspect = 1.40 (min = 0.10, max = 0.75) need search nearby using seed (129, 122, 153), TAL = (-1.0, 25.0, 6.0) talairach voxel to voxel transform 1.029 -0.053 0.002 3.592; 0.041 0.897 -0.078 -4.882; -0.011 0.121 1.134 -18.726; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; segmentation indicates cc at (129, 122, 153) --> (-1.0, 25.0, 6.0) done. writing output to filled.mgz... filling took 0.6 minutes talairach cc position changed to (-1.00, 25.00, 6.00) Erasing brainstem...done. seed_search_size = 9, min_neighbors = 5 search rh wm seed point around talairach space:(17.00, 25.00, 6.00) SRC: (111.70, 97.09, 168.27) search lh wm seed point around talairach space (-19.00, 25.00, 6.00), SRC: (148.76, 98.56, 167.87) compute mri_fill using aseg Erasing Brain Stem and Cerebellum ... Define left and right masks using aseg: Building Voronoi diagram ... Using the Voronoi diagram to separate WM into two hemispheres ... Find the largest connected component for each hemisphere ... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Tessellate lh Wed Jan 11 14:51:10 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts mri_pretess ../mri/filled.mgz 255 ../mri/norm.mgz ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (xy+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (xy+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (xy-): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 2 (xy-): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 4 pass 1 (yz+): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 7 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 7 pass 1 (yz-): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 10 pass 2 (yz-): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 10 pass 1 (xz+): 7 found - 7 modified | TOTAL: 17 pass 2 (xz+): 0 found - 7 modified | TOTAL: 17 pass 1 (xz-): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 18 pass 2 (xz-): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 18 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 1 pass 1 (++): 2 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 2 (++): 0 found - 2 modified | TOTAL: 2 pass 1 (+-): 3 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 2 (+-): 0 found - 3 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 5 pass 1 (-+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 6 pass 2 (-+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 6 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 1 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 2 (yz+): 0 found - 1 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 1 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 2 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (xy+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xy-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (yz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (xz-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Iteration Number : 3 pass 1 (++): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (+-): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (--): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 pass 1 (-+): 0 found - 0 modified | TOTAL: 0 Total Number of Modified Voxels = 25 (out of 410097: 0.006096) Ambiguous edge configurations... mri_pretess done mri_tessellate ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz 255 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix $Id: mri_tessellate.c,v 1.36 2011/03/02 00:04:25 nicks Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.693.2.2 2011/04/27 19:21:05 nicks Exp $ slice 30: 220 vertices, 264 faces slice 40: 5790 vertices, 6093 faces slice 50: 18092 vertices, 18635 faces slice 60: 34339 vertices, 34935 faces slice 70: 49783 vertices, 50391 faces slice 80: 65592 vertices, 66217 faces slice 90: 80129 vertices, 80758 faces slice 100: 95939 vertices, 96621 faces slice 110: 111549 vertices, 112242 faces slice 120: 126893 vertices, 127629 faces slice 130: 142778 vertices, 143606 faces slice 140: 159358 vertices, 160253 faces slice 150: 175160 vertices, 176110 faces slice 160: 189158 vertices, 190097 faces slice 170: 200727 vertices, 201604 faces slice 180: 210466 vertices, 211313 faces slice 190: 219315 vertices, 220175 faces slice 200: 226692 vertices, 227515 faces slice 210: 231043 vertices, 231691 faces slice 220: 231390 vertices, 231978 faces slice 230: 231390 vertices, 231978 faces slice 240: 231390 vertices, 231978 faces slice 250: 231390 vertices, 231978 faces using the conformed surface RAS to save vertex points... writing ../surf/lh.orig.nofix using vox2ras matrix: -1.000 0.000 0.000 128.000; 0.000 0.000 1.000 -128.000; 0.000 -1.000 0.000 128.000; 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000; rm -f ../mri/filled-pretess255.mgz mris_extract_main_component ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig.nofix counting number of connected components... 231390 voxel in cpt #1: X=-588 [v=231390,e=695934,f=463956] located at (-32.261101, -15.272030, 32.642189) For the whole surface: X=-588 [v=231390,e=695934,f=463956] One single component has been found nothing to do done #-------------------------------------------- #@# Smooth1 lh Wed Jan 11 14:51:15 GMT 2012 mris_smooth -nw -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts setting seed for random number generator to 1234 smoothing surface tessellation for 10 iterations... smoothing complete - recomputing first and second fundamental forms... #-------------------------------------------- #@# Inflation1 lh Wed Jan 11 14:51:20 GMT 2012 mris_inflate -no-save-sulc ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts avg radius = 52.9 mm, total surface area = 116052 mm^2 writing inflated surface to ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix inflation took 0.6 minutes Not saving sulc step 000: RMS=0.123 (target=0.015) step 005: RMS=0.095 (target=0.015) step 010: RMS=0.081 (target=0.015) step 015: RMS=0.073 (target=0.015) step 020: RMS=0.068 (target=0.015) step 025: RMS=0.064 (target=0.015) step 030: RMS=0.061 (target=0.015) step 035: RMS=0.058 (target=0.015) step 040: RMS=0.055 (target=0.015) step 045: RMS=0.054 (target=0.015) step 050: RMS=0.053 (target=0.015) step 055: RMS=0.053 (target=0.015) step 060: RMS=0.052 (target=0.015) inflation complete. Not saving sulc #-------------------------------------------- #@# QSphere lh Wed Jan 11 14:51:57 GMT 2012 /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts mris_sphere -q -seed 1234 ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix doing quick spherical unfolding. setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 $Id: mris_sphere.c,v 1.57 2011/03/02 00:04:34 nicks Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.693.2.2 2011/04/27 19:21:05 nicks Exp $ reading original vertex positions... unfolding cortex into spherical form... surface projected - minimizing metric distortion... vertex spacing 0.78 +- 0.56 (0.00-->8.64) (max @ vno 158474 --> 160146) face area 0.02 +- 0.03 (-0.59-->0.50) scaling brain by 0.255... inflating to sphere (rms error < 2.00) 000: dt: 0.0000, rms radial error=177.062, avgs=0 005/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.800, avgs=0 010/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=176.239, avgs=0 015/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=175.501, avgs=0 020/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=174.661, avgs=0 025/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=173.763, avgs=0 030/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=172.831, avgs=0 035/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=171.883, avgs=0 040/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=170.927, avgs=0 045/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.969, avgs=0 050/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=169.012, avgs=0 055/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=168.059, avgs=0 060/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=167.111, avgs=0 065/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=166.171, avgs=0 070/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=165.238, avgs=0 075/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=164.310, avgs=0 080/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=163.387, avgs=0 085/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=162.470, avgs=0 090/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=161.557, avgs=0 095/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=160.649, avgs=0 100/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=159.747, avgs=0 105/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=158.850, avgs=0 110/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.957, avgs=0 115/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=157.071, avgs=0 120/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=156.189, avgs=0 125/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=155.312, avgs=0 130/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=154.440, avgs=0 135/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=153.574, avgs=0 140/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=152.712, avgs=0 145/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.856, avgs=0 150/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=151.005, avgs=0 155/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=150.158, avgs=0 160/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=149.317, avgs=0 165/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=148.480, avgs=0 170/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=147.648, avgs=0 175/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=146.821, avgs=0 180/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.998, avgs=0 185/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=145.180, avgs=0 190/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=144.367, avgs=0 195/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=143.559, avgs=0 200/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=142.754, avgs=0 205/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.955, avgs=0 210/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=141.160, avgs=0 215/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=140.369, avgs=0 220/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=139.583, avgs=0 225/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.801, avgs=0 230/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=138.023, avgs=0 235/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=137.250, avgs=0 240/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=136.481, avgs=0 245/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=135.717, avgs=0 250/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.957, avgs=0 255/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=134.201, avgs=0 260/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=133.450, avgs=0 265/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=132.703, avgs=0 270/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.960, avgs=0 275/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=131.221, avgs=0 280/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=130.486, avgs=0 285/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.755, avgs=0 290/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=129.028, avgs=0 295/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=128.306, avgs=0 300/300: dt: 0.9000, rms radial error=127.587, avgs=0 spherical inflation complete. epoch 1 (K=10.0), pass 1, starting sse = 28953.85 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/10 = 0.00019 epoch 2 (K=40.0), pass 1, starting sse = 5726.16 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.00/10 = 0.00021 epoch 3 (K=160.0), pass 1, starting sse = 899.73 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.03/10 = 0.00272 epoch 4 (K=640.0), pass 1, starting sse = 150.99 taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... taking momentum steps... pass 1 complete, delta sse/iter = 0.13/11 = 0.01174 finalwriting spherical brain to ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix spherical transformation took 0.07 hours distance error %100000.00 #-------------------------------------------- #@# Fix Topology lh Wed Jan 11 14:56:23 GMT 2012 cp ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig cp ../surf/lh.inflated.nofix ../surf/lh.inflated /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts mris_fix_topology -mgz -sphere qsphere.nofix -ga -seed 1234 subject_1010 lh reading spherical homeomorphism from 'qsphere.nofix' using genetic algorithm with optimized parameters setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 ************************************************************* Topology Correction Parameters retessellation mode: genetic search number of patches/generation : 10 number of generations : 10 surface mri loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 volume mri loglikelihood coefficient : 10.0 normal dot loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 quadratic curvature loglikelihood coefficient : 1.0 volume resolution : 2 eliminate vertices during search : 1 initial patch selection : 1 select all defect vertices : 0 ordering dependant retessellation: 0 use precomputed edge table : 0 smooth retessellated patch : 2 match retessellated patch : 1 verbose mode : 0 ************************************************************* INFO: assuming .mgz format $Id: mris_fix_topology.c,v 1.48 2011/03/02 00:04:32 nicks Exp $ $Id: mrisurf.c,v 1.693.2.2 2011/04/27 19:21:05 nicks Exp $ before topology correction, eno=-588 (nv=231390, nf=463956, ne=695934, g=295) using quasi-homeomorphic spherical map to tessellate cortical surface... Correction of the Topology Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 10 iterations marking ambiguous vertices... 58361 ambiguous faces found in tessellation segmenting defects... 213 defects found, arbitrating ambiguous regions... analyzing neighboring defects... -merging segment 9 into 4 -merging segment 13 into 10 -merging segment 29 into 30 -merging segment 38 into 37 -merging segment 40 into 37 -merging segment 101 into 57 -merging segment 102 into 57 -merging segment 117 into 57 -merging segment 125 into 57 -merging segment 68 into 59 -merging segment 105 into 78 -merging segment 104 into 99 -merging segment 133 into 122 -merging segment 135 into 134 -merging segment 147 into 136 -merging segment 148 into 136 -merging segment 144 into 138 -merging segment 154 into 153 195 defects to be corrected 0 vertices coincident reading input surface /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/surf/lh.qsphere.nofix... reading brain volume from brain... reading wm segmentation from wm... Computing Initial Surface Statistics -face loglikelihood: -9.5015 (-4.7507) -vertex loglikelihood: -6.1140 (-3.0570) -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.5091 (-3.5091) -quad curv loglikelihood: -6.0671 (-3.0335) Total Loglikelihood : -25.1916 CORRECTING DEFECT 0 (vertices=57, convex hull=106) After retessellation of defect 0, euler #=-190 (197791,583478,385497) : difference with theory (-192) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 1 (vertices=23, convex hull=60) After retessellation of defect 1, euler #=-189 (197800,583530,385541) : difference with theory (-191) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 2 (vertices=24, convex hull=66) After retessellation of defect 2, euler #=-188 (197810,583582,385584) : difference with theory (-190) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 3 (vertices=17, convex hull=26) After retessellation of defect 3, euler #=-187 (197812,583597,385598) : difference with theory (-189) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 4 (vertices=155, convex hull=145) After retessellation of defect 4, euler #=-185 (197827,583713,385701) : difference with theory (-188) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 5 (vertices=224, convex hull=227) After retessellation of defect 5, euler #=-184 (197920,584107,386003) : difference with theory (-187) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 6 (vertices=49, convex hull=78) After retessellation of defect 6, euler #=-183 (197929,584163,386051) : difference with theory (-186) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 7 (vertices=33, convex hull=36) After retessellation of defect 7, euler #=-182 (197932,584182,386068) : difference with theory (-185) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 8 (vertices=59, convex hull=64) After retessellation of defect 8, euler #=-181 (197950,584266,386135) : difference with theory (-184) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 9 (vertices=63, convex hull=94) After retessellation of defect 9, euler #=-179 (197959,584334,386196) : difference with theory (-183) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 10 (vertices=109, convex hull=142) After retessellation of defect 10, euler #=-178 (197996,584509,386335) : difference with theory (-182) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 11 (vertices=21, convex hull=57) After retessellation of defect 11, euler #=-177 (198005,584561,386379) : difference with theory (-181) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 12 (vertices=30, convex hull=71) After retessellation of defect 12, euler #=-176 (198026,584649,386447) : difference with theory (-180) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 13 (vertices=26, convex hull=55) After retessellation of defect 13, euler #=-175 (198035,584694,386484) : difference with theory (-179) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 14 (vertices=44, convex hull=76) After retessellation of defect 14, euler #=-174 (198050,584768,386544) : difference with theory (-178) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 15 (vertices=106, convex hull=105) After retessellation of defect 15, euler #=-173 (198068,584867,386626) : difference with theory (-177) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 16 (vertices=566, convex hull=378) After retessellation of defect 16, euler #=-172 (198240,585612,387200) : difference with theory (-176) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 17 (vertices=61, convex hull=77) After retessellation of defect 17, euler #=-171 (198249,585670,387250) : difference with theory (-175) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 18 (vertices=44, convex hull=93) After retessellation of defect 18, euler #=-170 (198263,585752,387319) : difference with theory (-174) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 19 (vertices=140, convex hull=185) After retessellation of defect 19, euler #=-169 (198292,585929,387468) : difference with theory (-173) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 20 (vertices=32, convex hull=72) After retessellation of defect 20, euler #=-168 (198302,585991,387521) : difference with theory (-172) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 21 (vertices=26, convex hull=54) After retessellation of defect 21, euler #=-167 (198313,586046,387566) : difference with theory (-171) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 22 (vertices=37, convex hull=61) After retessellation of defect 22, euler #=-166 (198325,586104,387613) : difference with theory (-170) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 23 (vertices=149, convex hull=141) After retessellation of defect 23, euler #=-165 (198334,586191,387692) : difference with theory (-169) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 24 (vertices=632, convex hull=315) After retessellation of defect 24, euler #=-164 (198415,586589,388010) : difference with theory (-168) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 25 (vertices=25, convex hull=54) After retessellation of defect 25, euler #=-163 (198423,586636,388050) : difference with theory (-167) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 26 (vertices=6, convex hull=33) After retessellation of defect 26, euler #=-162 (198426,586655,388067) : difference with theory (-166) = -4 CORRECTING DEFECT 27 (vertices=127, convex hull=115) After retessellation of defect 27, euler #=-160 (198455,586792,388177) : difference with theory (-165) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 28 (vertices=20, convex hull=41) After retessellation of defect 28, euler #=-159 (198460,586821,388202) : difference with theory (-164) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 29 (vertices=24, convex hull=54) After retessellation of defect 29, euler #=-158 (198469,586870,388243) : difference with theory (-163) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 30 (vertices=159, convex hull=178) After retessellation of defect 30, euler #=-157 (198521,587106,388428) : difference with theory (-162) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 31 (vertices=29, convex hull=25) After retessellation of defect 31, euler #=-156 (198523,587124,388445) : difference with theory (-161) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 32 (vertices=353, convex hull=306) After retessellation of defect 32, euler #=-155 (198679,587737,388903) : difference with theory (-160) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 33 (vertices=33, convex hull=55) After retessellation of defect 33, euler #=-154 (198695,587806,388957) : difference with theory (-159) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 34 (vertices=5536, convex hull=1334) After retessellation of defect 34, euler #=-153 (200228,593169,392788) : difference with theory (-158) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 35 (vertices=12, convex hull=24) After retessellation of defect 35, euler #=-152 (200230,593180,392798) : difference with theory (-157) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 36 (vertices=322, convex hull=86) After retessellation of defect 36, euler #=-151 (200254,593286,392881) : difference with theory (-156) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 37 (vertices=28, convex hull=52) After retessellation of defect 37, euler #=-150 (200267,593341,392924) : difference with theory (-155) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 38 (vertices=50, convex hull=76) After retessellation of defect 38, euler #=-149 (200276,593402,392977) : difference with theory (-154) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 39 (vertices=75, convex hull=87) After retessellation of defect 39, euler #=-148 (200285,593462,393029) : difference with theory (-153) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 40 (vertices=40, convex hull=80) After retessellation of defect 40, euler #=-147 (200294,593524,393083) : difference with theory (-152) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 41 (vertices=20, convex hull=36) After retessellation of defect 41, euler #=-146 (200303,593561,393112) : difference with theory (-151) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 42 (vertices=137, convex hull=124) After retessellation of defect 42, euler #=-145 (200335,593726,393246) : difference with theory (-150) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 43 (vertices=40, convex hull=59) After retessellation of defect 43, euler #=-144 (200349,593791,393298) : difference with theory (-149) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 44 (vertices=322, convex hull=399) After retessellation of defect 44, euler #=-143 (200553,594588,393892) : difference with theory (-148) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 45 (vertices=69, convex hull=80) After retessellation of defect 45, euler #=-142 (200570,594677,393965) : difference with theory (-147) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 46 (vertices=109, convex hull=150) After retessellation of defect 46, euler #=-141 (200594,594818,394083) : difference with theory (-146) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 47 (vertices=36, convex hull=74) After retessellation of defect 47, euler #=-140 (200609,594896,394147) : difference with theory (-145) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 48 (vertices=265, convex hull=182) After retessellation of defect 48, euler #=-139 (200638,595068,394291) : difference with theory (-144) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 49 (vertices=61, convex hull=109) After retessellation of defect 49, euler #=-138 (200655,595165,394372) : difference with theory (-143) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 50 (vertices=166, convex hull=187) After retessellation of defect 50, euler #=-137 (200696,595381,394548) : difference with theory (-142) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 51 (vertices=23, convex hull=59) After retessellation of defect 51, euler #=-136 (200708,595439,394595) : difference with theory (-141) = -5 CORRECTING DEFECT 52 (vertices=9214, convex hull=2871) After retessellation of defect 52, euler #=-141 (203572,605661,401948) : difference with theory (-140) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 53 (vertices=87, convex hull=108) After retessellation of defect 53, euler #=-140 (203581,605734,402013) : difference with theory (-139) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 54 (vertices=414, convex hull=268) After retessellation of defect 54, euler #=-138 (203663,606121,402320) : difference with theory (-138) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 55 (vertices=20, convex hull=44) After retessellation of defect 55, euler #=-137 (203672,606162,402353) : difference with theory (-137) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 56 (vertices=15, convex hull=36) After retessellation of defect 56, euler #=-136 (203674,606179,402369) : difference with theory (-136) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 57 (vertices=22, convex hull=41) After retessellation of defect 57, euler #=-135 (203676,606200,402389) : difference with theory (-135) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 58 (vertices=5, convex hull=19) After retessellation of defect 58, euler #=-134 (203677,606207,402396) : difference with theory (-134) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 59 (vertices=48, convex hull=37) After retessellation of defect 59, euler #=-133 (203679,606226,402414) : difference with theory (-133) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 60 (vertices=21, convex hull=48) After retessellation of defect 60, euler #=-132 (203687,606269,402450) : difference with theory (-132) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 61 (vertices=48, convex hull=29) After retessellation of defect 61, euler #=-131 (203697,606309,402481) : difference with theory (-131) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 62 (vertices=33, convex hull=46) After retessellation of defect 62, euler #=-130 (203710,606364,402524) : difference with theory (-130) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 63 (vertices=7, convex hull=29) After retessellation of defect 63, euler #=-129 (203712,606379,402538) : difference with theory (-129) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 64 (vertices=80, convex hull=104) After retessellation of defect 64, euler #=-128 (203722,606453,402603) : difference with theory (-128) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 65 (vertices=5, convex hull=21) After retessellation of defect 65, euler #=-127 (203722,606459,402610) : difference with theory (-127) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 66 (vertices=142, convex hull=163) After retessellation of defect 66, euler #=-126 (203786,606725,402813) : difference with theory (-126) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 67 (vertices=215, convex hull=263) After retessellation of defect 67, euler #=-125 (203927,607270,403218) : difference with theory (-125) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 68 (vertices=25, convex hull=49) After retessellation of defect 68, euler #=-124 (203936,607312,403252) : difference with theory (-124) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 69 (vertices=23, convex hull=40) After retessellation of defect 69, euler #=-123 (203949,607364,403292) : difference with theory (-123) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 70 (vertices=5, convex hull=21) Warning - incorrect dp selected!!!!(-80.279594 >= -80.279599 ) After retessellation of defect 70, euler #=-122 (203951,607376,403303) : difference with theory (-122) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 71 (vertices=28, convex hull=59) After retessellation of defect 71, euler #=-121 (203961,607431,403349) : difference with theory (-121) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 72 (vertices=1010, convex hull=478) After retessellation of defect 72, euler #=-120 (204344,608831,404367) : difference with theory (-120) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 73 (vertices=31, convex hull=25) After retessellation of defect 73, euler #=-119 (204346,608846,404381) : difference with theory (-119) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 74 (vertices=236, convex hull=89) After retessellation of defect 74, euler #=-118 (204370,608958,404470) : difference with theory (-118) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 75 (vertices=11, convex hull=24) After retessellation of defect 75, euler #=-117 (204372,608971,404482) : difference with theory (-117) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 76 (vertices=5, convex hull=16) After retessellation of defect 76, euler #=-116 (204374,608981,404491) : difference with theory (-116) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 77 (vertices=47, convex hull=42) After retessellation of defect 77, euler #=-115 (204380,609012,404517) : difference with theory (-115) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 78 (vertices=15, convex hull=34) After retessellation of defect 78, euler #=-114 (204382,609032,404536) : difference with theory (-114) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 79 (vertices=69, convex hull=92) After retessellation of defect 79, euler #=-114 (204404,609141,404623) : difference with theory (-113) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 80 (vertices=57, convex hull=86) After retessellation of defect 80, euler #=-113 (204427,609244,404704) : difference with theory (-112) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 81 (vertices=534, convex hull=353) After retessellation of defect 81, euler #=-112 (204583,609916,405221) : difference with theory (-111) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 82 (vertices=85, convex hull=64) After retessellation of defect 82, euler #=-111 (204620,610050,405319) : difference with theory (-110) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 83 (vertices=39, convex hull=28) After retessellation of defect 83, euler #=-110 (204626,610082,405346) : difference with theory (-109) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 84 (vertices=18, convex hull=41) After retessellation of defect 84, euler #=-109 (204635,610124,405380) : difference with theory (-108) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 85 (vertices=59, convex hull=29) After retessellation of defect 85, euler #=-108 (204642,610156,405406) : difference with theory (-107) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 86 (vertices=85, convex hull=110) After retessellation of defect 86, euler #=-107 (204677,610306,405522) : difference with theory (-106) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 87 (vertices=121, convex hull=118) After retessellation of defect 87, euler #=-106 (204715,610480,405659) : difference with theory (-105) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 88 (vertices=65, convex hull=84) After retessellation of defect 88, euler #=-105 (204745,610612,405762) : difference with theory (-104) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 89 (vertices=240, convex hull=138) After retessellation of defect 89, euler #=-104 (204782,610787,405901) : difference with theory (-103) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 90 (vertices=44, convex hull=57) After retessellation of defect 90, euler #=-103 (204796,610857,405958) : difference with theory (-102) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 91 (vertices=97, convex hull=28) After retessellation of defect 91, euler #=-102 (204803,610884,405979) : difference with theory (-101) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 92 (vertices=25, convex hull=25) After retessellation of defect 92, euler #=-101 (204805,610896,405990) : difference with theory (-100) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 93 (vertices=95, convex hull=146) After retessellation of defect 93, euler #=-99 (204861,611131,406171) : difference with theory (-99) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 94 (vertices=6, convex hull=11) After retessellation of defect 94, euler #=-98 (204862,611137,406177) : difference with theory (-98) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 95 (vertices=9, convex hull=21) After retessellation of defect 95, euler #=-97 (204864,611150,406189) : difference with theory (-97) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 96 (vertices=9, convex hull=13) After retessellation of defect 96, euler #=-96 (204865,611156,406195) : difference with theory (-96) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 97 (vertices=9, convex hull=11) After retessellation of defect 97, euler #=-95 (204866,611162,406201) : difference with theory (-95) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 98 (vertices=159, convex hull=102) After retessellation of defect 98, euler #=-94 (204878,611243,406271) : difference with theory (-94) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 99 (vertices=217, convex hull=103) After retessellation of defect 99, euler #=-93 (204922,611417,406402) : difference with theory (-93) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 100 (vertices=242, convex hull=128) After retessellation of defect 100, euler #=-92 (204932,611509,406485) : difference with theory (-92) = 0 CORRECTING DEFECT 101 (vertices=40, convex hull=68) After retessellation of defect 101, euler #=-92 (204948,611586,406546) : difference with theory (-91) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 102 (vertices=27, convex hull=64) After retessellation of defect 102, euler #=-91 (204964,611656,406601) : difference with theory (-90) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 103 (vertices=83, convex hull=92) After retessellation of defect 103, euler #=-90 (204998,611791,406703) : difference with theory (-89) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 104 (vertices=16, convex hull=30) After retessellation of defect 104, euler #=-89 (204998,611798,406711) : difference with theory (-88) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 105 (vertices=6, convex hull=19) After retessellation of defect 105, euler #=-88 (204999,611809,406722) : difference with theory (-87) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 106 (vertices=19, convex hull=36) After retessellation of defect 106, euler #=-87 (205004,611835,406744) : difference with theory (-86) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 107 (vertices=20, convex hull=32) After retessellation of defect 107, euler #=-86 (205008,611857,406763) : difference with theory (-85) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 108 (vertices=113, convex hull=99) After retessellation of defect 108, euler #=-86 (205025,611956,406845) : difference with theory (-84) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 109 (vertices=9, convex hull=14) After retessellation of defect 109, euler #=-85 (205026,611962,406851) : difference with theory (-83) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 110 (vertices=426, convex hull=133) After retessellation of defect 110, euler #=-84 (205068,612152,407000) : difference with theory (-82) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 111 (vertices=120, convex hull=65) After retessellation of defect 111, euler #=-83 (205080,612223,407060) : difference with theory (-81) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 112 (vertices=90, convex hull=47) After retessellation of defect 112, euler #=-82 (205094,612283,407107) : difference with theory (-80) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 113 (vertices=114, convex hull=27) After retessellation of defect 113, euler #=-81 (205104,612323,407138) : difference with theory (-79) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 114 (vertices=822, convex hull=309) After retessellation of defect 114, euler #=-80 (205132,612558,407346) : difference with theory (-78) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 115 (vertices=55, convex hull=66) After retessellation of defect 115, euler #=-79 (205148,612632,407405) : difference with theory (-77) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 116 (vertices=28, convex hull=58) After retessellation of defect 116, euler #=-78 (205158,612687,407451) : difference with theory (-76) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 117 (vertices=29, convex hull=37) After retessellation of defect 117, euler #=-77 (205165,612722,407480) : difference with theory (-75) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 118 (vertices=19, convex hull=19) After retessellation of defect 118, euler #=-76 (205167,612733,407490) : difference with theory (-74) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 119 (vertices=124, convex hull=98) After retessellation of defect 119, euler #=-75 (205221,612936,407640) : difference with theory (-73) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 120 (vertices=45, convex hull=41) After retessellation of defect 120, euler #=-74 (205234,612993,407685) : difference with theory (-72) = 2 CORRECTING DEFECT 121 (vertices=69, convex hull=128) After retessellation of defect 121, euler #=-72 (205243,613079,407764) : difference with theory (-71) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 122 (vertices=1487, convex hull=543) After retessellation of defect 122, euler #=-69 (205605,614479,408805) : difference with theory (-70) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 123 (vertices=6, convex hull=16) After retessellation of defect 123, euler #=-68 (205606,614486,408812) : difference with theory (-69) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 124 (vertices=627, convex hull=268) After retessellation of defect 124, euler #=-66 (205640,614725,409019) : difference with theory (-68) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 125 (vertices=40, convex hull=71) After retessellation of defect 125, euler #=-65 (205649,614780,409066) : difference with theory (-67) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 126 (vertices=107, convex hull=107) After retessellation of defect 126, euler #=-64 (205704,614998,409230) : difference with theory (-66) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 127 (vertices=80, convex hull=79) After retessellation of defect 127, euler #=-63 (205726,615098,409309) : difference with theory (-65) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 128 (vertices=154, convex hull=231) After retessellation of defect 128, euler #=-62 (205829,615511,409620) : difference with theory (-64) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 129 (vertices=25, convex hull=44) After retessellation of defect 129, euler #=-61 (205839,615557,409657) : difference with theory (-63) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 130 (vertices=154, convex hull=62) After retessellation of defect 130, euler #=-60 (205880,615706,409766) : difference with theory (-62) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 131 (vertices=50, convex hull=73) After retessellation of defect 131, euler #=-59 (205903,615806,409844) : difference with theory (-61) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 132 (vertices=97, convex hull=81) After retessellation of defect 132, euler #=-58 (205922,615896,409916) : difference with theory (-60) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 133 (vertices=25, convex hull=22) After retessellation of defect 133, euler #=-57 (205924,615910,409929) : difference with theory (-59) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 134 (vertices=64, convex hull=66) After retessellation of defect 134, euler #=-56 (205943,615995,409996) : difference with theory (-58) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 135 (vertices=17, convex hull=31) After retessellation of defect 135, euler #=-55 (205947,616017,410015) : difference with theory (-57) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 136 (vertices=156, convex hull=190) After retessellation of defect 136, euler #=-53 (206010,616297,410234) : difference with theory (-56) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 137 (vertices=43, convex hull=60) After retessellation of defect 137, euler #=-52 (206027,616371,410292) : difference with theory (-55) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 138 (vertices=41, convex hull=54) After retessellation of defect 138, euler #=-51 (206041,616437,410345) : difference with theory (-54) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 139 (vertices=315, convex hull=251) After retessellation of defect 139, euler #=-50 (206114,616772,410608) : difference with theory (-53) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 140 (vertices=23, convex hull=49) After retessellation of defect 140, euler #=-49 (206128,616830,410653) : difference with theory (-52) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 141 (vertices=12, convex hull=26) After retessellation of defect 141, euler #=-48 (206131,616847,410668) : difference with theory (-51) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 142 (vertices=75, convex hull=91) After retessellation of defect 142, euler #=-47 (206140,616917,410730) : difference with theory (-50) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 143 (vertices=56, convex hull=74) After retessellation of defect 143, euler #=-46 (206163,617020,410811) : difference with theory (-49) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 144 (vertices=33, convex hull=66) After retessellation of defect 144, euler #=-45 (206184,617114,410885) : difference with theory (-48) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 145 (vertices=19, convex hull=29) After retessellation of defect 145, euler #=-44 (206188,617135,410903) : difference with theory (-47) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 146 (vertices=30, convex hull=27) After retessellation of defect 146, euler #=-43 (206188,617150,410919) : difference with theory (-46) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 147 (vertices=170, convex hull=161) After retessellation of defect 147, euler #=-42 (206267,617462,411153) : difference with theory (-45) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 148 (vertices=23, convex hull=20) After retessellation of defect 148, euler #=-41 (206268,617471,411162) : difference with theory (-44) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 149 (vertices=52, convex hull=71) After retessellation of defect 149, euler #=-40 (206280,617540,411220) : difference with theory (-43) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 150 (vertices=44, convex hull=67) After retessellation of defect 150, euler #=-39 (206293,617603,411271) : difference with theory (-42) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 151 (vertices=75, convex hull=87) After retessellation of defect 151, euler #=-38 (206314,617706,411354) : difference with theory (-41) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 152 (vertices=64, convex hull=69) After retessellation of defect 152, euler #=-37 (206323,617762,411402) : difference with theory (-40) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 153 (vertices=40, convex hull=80) After retessellation of defect 153, euler #=-36 (206342,617852,411474) : difference with theory (-39) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 154 (vertices=108, convex hull=125) After retessellation of defect 154, euler #=-35 (206386,618038,411617) : difference with theory (-38) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 155 (vertices=5, convex hull=11) After retessellation of defect 155, euler #=-34 (206386,618041,411621) : difference with theory (-37) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 156 (vertices=53, convex hull=36) After retessellation of defect 156, euler #=-33 (206397,618090,411660) : difference with theory (-36) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 157 (vertices=6, convex hull=18) After retessellation of defect 157, euler #=-32 (206398,618098,411668) : difference with theory (-35) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 158 (vertices=154, convex hull=190) After retessellation of defect 158, euler #=-31 (206416,618244,411797) : difference with theory (-34) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 159 (vertices=59, convex hull=86) After retessellation of defect 159, euler #=-30 (206434,618339,411875) : difference with theory (-33) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 160 (vertices=26, convex hull=26) After retessellation of defect 160, euler #=-29 (206436,618353,411888) : difference with theory (-32) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 161 (vertices=20, convex hull=46) After retessellation of defect 161, euler #=-28 (206445,618398,411925) : difference with theory (-31) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 162 (vertices=24, convex hull=39) After retessellation of defect 162, euler #=-27 (206446,618417,411944) : difference with theory (-30) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 163 (vertices=30, convex hull=73) After retessellation of defect 163, euler #=-26 (206455,618466,411985) : difference with theory (-29) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 164 (vertices=32, convex hull=61) After retessellation of defect 164, euler #=-25 (206464,618516,412027) : difference with theory (-28) = -3 CORRECTING DEFECT 165 (vertices=41, convex hull=69) After retessellation of defect 165, euler #=-25 (206469,618563,412069) : difference with theory (-27) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 166 (vertices=56, convex hull=96) After retessellation of defect 166, euler #=-24 (206494,618688,412170) : difference with theory (-26) = -2 CORRECTING DEFECT 167 (vertices=47, convex hull=65) After retessellation of defect 167, euler #=-24 (206503,618743,412216) : difference with theory (-25) = -1 CORRECTING DEFECT 168 (vertices=222, convex hull=180) After retessellation of defect 168, euler #=-25 (206563,619018,412430) : difference with theory (-24) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 169 (vertices=17, convex hull=25) After retessellation of defect 169, euler #=-24 (206563,619024,412437) : difference with theory (-23) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 170 (vertices=35, convex hull=80) After retessellation of defect 170, euler #=-23 (206581,619110,412506) : difference with theory (-22) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 171 (vertices=176, convex hull=221) After retessellation of defect 171, euler #=-22 (206653,619422,412747) : difference with theory (-21) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 172 (vertices=37, convex hull=60) Warning - incorrect dp selected!!!!(-81.460773 >= -81.460779 ) After retessellation of defect 172, euler #=-21 (206661,619468,412786) : difference with theory (-20) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 173 (vertices=57, convex hull=30) After retessellation of defect 173, euler #=-20 (206664,619486,412802) : difference with theory (-19) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 174 (vertices=18, convex hull=27) After retessellation of defect 174, euler #=-19 (206665,619499,412815) : difference with theory (-18) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 175 (vertices=29, convex hull=79) After retessellation of defect 175, euler #=-18 (206680,619578,412880) : difference with theory (-17) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 176 (vertices=18, convex hull=54) After retessellation of defect 176, euler #=-17 (206689,619625,412919) : difference with theory (-16) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 177 (vertices=26, convex hull=46) After retessellation of defect 177, euler #=-16 (206696,619662,412950) : difference with theory (-15) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 178 (vertices=42, convex hull=75) After retessellation of defect 178, euler #=-15 (206717,619753,413021) : difference with theory (-14) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 179 (vertices=34, convex hull=73) After retessellation of defect 179, euler #=-14 (206726,619810,413070) : difference with theory (-13) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 180 (vertices=24, convex hull=19) After retessellation of defect 180, euler #=-13 (206726,619818,413079) : difference with theory (-12) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 181 (vertices=34, convex hull=73) After retessellation of defect 181, euler #=-12 (206745,619905,413148) : difference with theory (-11) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 182 (vertices=38, convex hull=29) After retessellation of defect 182, euler #=-11 (206748,619926,413167) : difference with theory (-10) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 183 (vertices=32, convex hull=67) After retessellation of defect 183, euler #=-10 (206757,619980,413213) : difference with theory (-9) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 184 (vertices=45, convex hull=82) After retessellation of defect 184, euler #=-9 (206776,620071,413286) : difference with theory (-8) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 185 (vertices=66, convex hull=87) After retessellation of defect 185, euler #=-8 (206798,620177,413371) : difference with theory (-7) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 186 (vertices=57, convex hull=16) After retessellation of defect 186, euler #=-7 (206801,620192,413384) : difference with theory (-6) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 187 (vertices=63, convex hull=96) After retessellation of defect 187, euler #=-6 (206827,620311,413478) : difference with theory (-5) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 188 (vertices=173, convex hull=134) After retessellation of defect 188, euler #=-5 (206854,620458,413599) : difference with theory (-4) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 189 (vertices=27, convex hull=29) After retessellation of defect 189, euler #=-4 (206858,620481,413619) : difference with theory (-3) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 190 (vertices=39, convex hull=14) After retessellation of defect 190, euler #=-3 (206859,620487,413625) : difference with theory (-2) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 191 (vertices=15, convex hull=19) After retessellation of defect 191, euler #=-2 (206861,620499,413636) : difference with theory (-1) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 192 (vertices=24, convex hull=35) After retessellation of defect 192, euler #=-1 (206863,620518,413654) : difference with theory (0) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 193 (vertices=134, convex hull=78) After retessellation of defect 193, euler #=0 (206875,620596,413721) : difference with theory (1) = 1 CORRECTING DEFECT 194 (vertices=32, convex hull=54) After retessellation of defect 194, euler #=1 (206881,620637,413757) : difference with theory (2) = 1 computing original vertex metric properties... storing new metric properties... computing tessellation statistics... vertex spacing 0.90 +- 0.40 (0.02-->20.91) (max @ vno 105509 --> 209840) face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00) performing soap bubble on retessellated vertices for 0 iterations... vertex spacing 0.90 +- 0.40 (0.02-->20.91) (max @ vno 105509 --> 209840) face area 0.00 +- 0.00 (0.00-->0.00) tessellation finished, orienting corrected surface... 698 mutations (35.8%), 1253 crossovers (64.2%), 1748 vertices were eliminated building final representation... 24509 vertices and 0 faces have been removed from triangulation after topology correction, eno=1 (nv=206881, nf=413757, ne=620637, g=0) writing corrected surface to /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/surf/lh.orig... edge (204421<-->204426) has one single face 404595 ! edge (204421<-->204428) has one single face 404592 ! edge (204426<-->204428) has one single face 404604 ! edge (204426<-->204421) has one single face 404595 ! edge (204428<-->204426) has one single face 404604 ! edge (204428<-->204421) has one single face 404592 ! 0.000 % of the vertices (0 vertices) exhibit an orientation change topology fixing took 183.6 minutes edge 220500 <--> 220512 has 1 face(s)! (404595) 220500 109561 220512 !!! edge 220500 <--> 220520 has 1 face(s)! (404592) 220500 220520 220509 !!! edge 220512 <--> 220520 has 1 face(s)! (404604) 220512 220513 220520 !!! 3 defective edges removing intersecting faces 000: 5633 intersecting 001: 1096 intersecting 002: 784 intersecting 003: 545 intersecting 004: 467 intersecting 005: 345 intersecting 006: 312 intersecting 007: 284 intersecting 008: 265 intersecting 009: 255 intersecting 010: 257 intersecting 011: 248 intersecting 012: 236 intersecting 013: 234 intersecting 014: 239 intersecting 015: 232 intersecting 016: 230 intersecting 017: 221 intersecting 018: 202 intersecting 019: 184 intersecting 020: 175 intersecting 021: 165 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 2 022: 165 intersecting 023: 181 intersecting 024: 174 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 3 025: 174 intersecting 026: 178 intersecting 027: 183 intersecting expanding nbhd size to 4 028: 183 intersecting 029: 186 intersecting 030: 191 intersecting 031: 197 intersecting 032: 205 intersecting 033: 207 intersecting 034: 223 intersecting 035: 212 intersecting 036: 208 intersecting 037: 216 intersecting 038: 211 intersecting 039: 213 intersecting 040: 190 intersecting 041: 176 intersecting 042: 152 intersecting 043: 154 intersecting 044: 125 intersecting 045: 123 intersecting 046: 121 intersecting 047: 119 intersecting 048: 113 intersecting 049: 104 intersecting 050: 96 intersecting 051: 93 intersecting 052: 82 intersecting 053: 64 intersecting 054: 57 intersecting 055: 39 intersecting mris_euler_number ../surf/lh.orig mris_fix_topology failed! (euler number != 2) Trying mris_topo_fixer... cp ../surf/lh.orig.nofix ../surf/lh.orig euler # = v-e+f = 2g-2: 206881 - 620637 + 413757 = 1 --> 1 holes F =2V-4: 413757 != 413762-4 (1) 2E=3F: 1241274 != 1241271 (3) total defect index = 4 cp ../surf/lh.qsphere.nofix ../surf/lh.qsphere cp ../surf/lh.smoothwm.nofix ../surf/lh.smoothwm /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/scripts mris_topo_fixer -mgz -warnings -seed 1234 subject_1010 lh verbose mode on (medium mode): printing warnings setting seed for random number genererator to 1234 Before topology correction, eno=-588 (nv=231390, nf=463956, ne=695934, g=295) Surface Diagnostics: eno=-588 (nv=231390, nf=463956, ne=695934) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 The original surface is a valid manifold Counting the number of connected components The original surface has one component The original surface does not self-intersect The surface has 295 loops (X=-588) Finding true center and radius of Spherical Surface...done Surface centered at (0,0,0) with radius 100.0 in 10 iterations identify defects... marking ambiguous vertices... 59419 ambiguous faces found in tessellation segmenting defects... analyzing defects for overlaps... INFO: assuming .mgz format reading input surface /home/clare/freesurfer/freesurfer/subjects/subject_1010/surf/lh.orig... reading brain volume from brain... reading wm segmentation from wm... Detecting contrast direction: right direction [ GM (86.53) < WM (100.25) ] Computing Initial Surface Statistics -face loglikelihood: -6.1966 (-3.0983) -vertex loglikelihood: -6.1069 (-3.0535) -normal dot loglikelihood: -3.5078 (-3.5078) -quad curv loglikelihood: -5.7927 (-2.8964) Total Loglikelihood : -21.6041 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 1 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 1: 108 vertices location: [ (152,95,37) - average intensity = 93.904 ] -gray ( 88.13 , 7.04 ) -white ( 99.51 , 3.86 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.125702 [log = -2.670702 ]- 99.512169 [log = -2.455211 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 183(183) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [28,83] BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.05136 mri =0.000 curv = 0.832 unmri = -0.278 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.83 , q= 1.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.83 , q= 1.66 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.08641 mri =0.000 curv = 0.598 unmri = -0.306 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.60 , q= 1.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.60 , q= 1.20 ) 57 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected max face = 183(239) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [28,83] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.67254 mri =0.000 curv = 2.346 unmri = 0.290 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.35 , q= 4.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.35 , q= 4.69 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.06096 mri =0.000 curv = 1.533 unmri = -0.073 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.53 , q= 3.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.53 , q= 3.07 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.22945 mri =0.000 curv = 1.257 unmri = 0.201 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.26 , q= 2.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.26 , q= 2.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.47027 mri =0.000 curv = 0.452 unmri = -0.336 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.46747 mri =0.000 curv = 0.451 unmri = -0.337 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.46624 mri =0.000 curv = 0.451 unmri = -0.337 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.37207 mri =0.000 curv = 0.475 unmri = -0.526 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.47 , q= 0.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.47 , q= 0.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.36679 mri =0.000 curv = 0.473 unmri = -0.526 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.47 , q= 0.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.47 , q= 0.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.36623 mri =0.000 curv = 0.473 unmri = -0.526 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.47 , q= 0.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.47 , q= 0.95 ) 59 patches have been generated - 26 self-intersected max face = 183(279) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [28,83] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.92245 mri =0.000 curv = 0.370 unmri = -0.557 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.37 , q= 0.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.37 , q= 0.74 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.91696 mri =0.000 curv = 0.368 unmri = -0.557 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.37 , q= 0.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.37 , q= 0.74 ) 56 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.91696 # generated patches : 172 (71 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -582 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-582 (nv=231464, nf=464092, ne=696138) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 2 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 2: 51 vertices location: [ (142,90,37) - average intensity = 94.084 ] -gray ( 86.98 , 5.11 ) -white ( 99.39 , 3.64 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.982597 [log = -2.651227 ]- 99.390419 [log = -2.305019 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 78(78) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,41] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.77120 mri =0.000 curv = 0.807 unmri = 2.543 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.61 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.38504 mri =0.000 curv = 0.257 unmri = -5.415 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.26 , q= 0.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.26 , q= 0.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.54419 mri =0.000 curv = 0.199 unmri = -5.342 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.20 , q= 0.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.20 , q= 0.40 ) 27 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 4.54419 # generated patches : 27 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -580 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-580 (nv=231494, nf=464148, ne=696222) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 3 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 3: 49 vertices location: [ (158,96,38) - average intensity = 92.214 ] -gray ( 81.43 , 24.05 ) -white ( 92.23 , 26.42 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (81.432167 [log = -5.078768 ]- 92.226730 [log = -3.678866 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 75(75) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,40] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.64375 mri =0.000 curv = 9.676 unmri = -8.061 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.68 , q= 19.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.68 , q= 19.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.13223 mri =0.000 curv = 1.353 unmri = -5.543 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.35 , q= 2.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.35 , q= 2.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.30627 mri =0.000 curv = 1.087 unmri = -6.656 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.56534 mri =0.000 curv = 1.023 unmri = -6.656 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.02 , q= 2.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.02 , q= 2.05 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 2.56534 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -578 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-578 (nv=231516, nf=464188, ne=696282) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 4 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 4!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -578 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-578 (nv=231516, nf=464188, ne=696282) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 5 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 5: 187 vertices location: [ (164,114,40) - average intensity = 92.588 ] -gray ( 84.44 , 11.14 ) -white ( 100.07 , 4.55 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (84.435150 [log = -3.633473 ]- 100.065598 [log = -2.885875 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 344(344) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [53,148] BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.28801 mri =0.000 curv = 5.524 unmri = -0.809 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.52 , q= 11.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.52 , q= 11.05 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -14.97223 mri =0.000 curv = 6.094 unmri = -9.404 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.09 , q= 12.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.09 , q= 12.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.53572 mri =0.000 curv = 4.690 unmri = -18.223 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.69 , q= 9.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.69 , q= 9.38 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.59197 mri =0.000 curv = 4.558 unmri = -22.822 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.56 , q= 9.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.56 , q= 9.12 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 11.20755 mri =0.000 curv = 7.469 unmri = -41.083 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.47 , q= 14.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.47 , q= 14.94 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 12.76701 mri =0.000 curv = 6.803 unmri = -39.978 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.80 , q= 13.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.80 , q= 13.61 ) 113 patches have been generated - 49 self-intersected max face = 344(448) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [53,148] BEST FITNESS (o)is 8.63589 mri =0.000 curv = 7.777 unmri = -39.745 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.78 , q= 15.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.78 , q= 15.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.01910 mri =0.000 curv = 7.682 unmri = -39.746 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.68 , q= 15.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.68 , q= 15.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 15.32560 mri =0.000 curv = 6.167 unmri = -39.994 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.17 , q= 12.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.17 , q= 12.33 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 20.58482 mri =0.000 curv = 6.756 unmri = -47.610 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.76 , q= 13.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.76 , q= 13.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.71734 mri =0.000 curv = 5.737 unmri = -44.667 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.74 , q= 11.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.74 , q= 11.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.72061 mri =0.000 curv = 5.735 unmri = -44.662 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.74 , q= 11.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.74 , q= 11.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 24.10232 mri =0.000 curv = 5.144 unmri = -44.678 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.14 , q= 10.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.14 , q= 10.29 ) 116 patches have been generated - 55 self-intersected max face = 344(592) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [53,148] BEST FITNESS (o)is 19.00917 mri =0.000 curv = 5.513 unmri = -41.063 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.51 , q= 11.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.51 , q= 11.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.74453 mri =0.000 curv = 5.041 unmri = -41.909 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.04 , q= 10.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.04 , q= 10.08 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 28.47496 mri =0.000 curv = 4.624 unmri = -46.970 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.62 , q= 9.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.62 , q= 9.25 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 28.56034 mri =0.000 curv = 4.587 unmri = -46.909 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.59 , q= 9.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.59 , q= 9.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 28.70537 mri =0.000 curv = 4.598 unmri = -47.097 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.60 , q= 9.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.60 , q= 9.20 ) 114 patches have been generated - 62 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 28.70537 # generated patches : 343 (166 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -572 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-572 (nv=231678, nf=464500, ne=696750) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 6 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 6: 326 vertices location: [ (157,124,42) - average intensity = 94.608 ] -gray ( 84.36 , 12.11 ) -white ( 100.38 , 3.84 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (84.361458 [log = -3.740478 ]- 100.380646 [log = -2.319273 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 561(561) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [85,234] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.89939 mri =0.000 curv = 0.222 unmri = 0.013 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.22 , q= 0.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.22 , q= 0.44 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.29144 mri =0.000 curv = 0.643 unmri = -5.863 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.64 , q= 1.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.64 , q= 1.29 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.70792 mri =0.000 curv = 0.525 unmri = -5.807 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.05 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.74865 mri =0.000 curv = 0.508 unmri = -5.782 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.51 , q= 1.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.51 , q= 1.02 ) 183 patches have been generated - 39 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 3.74865 # generated patches : 183 (39 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -570 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-570 (nv=231704, nf=464548, ne=696822) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 7 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 7: 81 vertices location: [ (161,103,40) - average intensity = 92.787 ] -gray ( 86.85 , 8.25 ) -white ( 98.51 , 4.26 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.849510 [log = -2.791855 ]- 98.513657 [log = -2.717549 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 137(137) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -50.13003 mri =0.000 curv = 12.810 unmri = -1.110 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.81 , q= 25.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.81 , q= 25.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.73991 mri =0.000 curv = 4.800 unmri = -1.461 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.80 , q= 9.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.80 , q= 9.60 ) 45 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected max face = 137(197) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [22,65] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.53816 mri =0.000 curv = 9.037 unmri = -2.611 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.04 , q= 18.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.04 , q= 18.07 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.16605 mri =0.000 curv = 7.235 unmri = -2.772 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.23 , q= 14.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.23 , q= 14.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.13496 mri =0.000 curv = 5.976 unmri = -2.770 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.98 , q= 11.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.98 , q= 11.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.23799 mri =0.000 curv = 4.523 unmri = 0.144 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.52 , q= 9.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.52 , q= 9.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.23070 mri =0.000 curv = 3.516 unmri = 0.165 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.52 , q= 7.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.52 , q= 7.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.23070 mri =0.000 curv = 3.516 unmri = 0.165 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.52 , q= 7.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.52 , q= 7.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.97905 mri =0.000 curv = 3.491 unmri = 0.014 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.49 , q= 6.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.49 , q= 6.98 ) 44 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -13.97905 # generated patches : 89 (44 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -566 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-566 (nv=231766, nf=464664, ne=696996) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 8 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 8!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -566 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-566 (nv=231766, nf=464664, ne=696996) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 9 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 9: 91 vertices location: [ (165,126,43) - average intensity = 91.420 ] -gray ( 85.93 , 8.79 ) -white ( 98.84 , 3.67 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.926842 [log = -3.272159 ]- 98.837158 [log = -2.376746 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 163(163) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.09439 mri =0.000 curv = 5.420 unmri = -0.585 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.42 , q= 10.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.42 , q= 10.84 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.03335 mri =0.000 curv = 0.687 unmri = 3.285 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.69 , q= 1.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.69 , q= 1.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.93205 mri =0.000 curv = 0.972 unmri = 0.043 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.97 , q= 1.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.97 , q= 1.94 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.91953 mri =0.000 curv = 0.968 unmri = 0.046 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.97 , q= 1.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.97 , q= 1.94 ) 50 patches have been generated - 16 self-intersected max face = 163(203) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.33725 mri =0.000 curv = 4.719 unmri = -0.539 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.72 , q= 9.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.72 , q= 9.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.13876 mri =0.000 curv = 2.103 unmri = 3.728 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.21 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.39884 mri =0.000 curv = 2.763 unmri = 0.346 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.76 , q= 5.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.76 , q= 5.53 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.12782 mri =0.000 curv = 2.695 unmri = 0.347 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.39 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.36449 mri =0.000 curv = 1.583 unmri = -0.966 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.58 , q= 3.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.58 , q= 3.17 ) 51 patches have been generated - 26 self-intersected max face = 163(243) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.07169 mri =0.000 curv = 6.898 unmri = -1.519 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.90 , q= 13.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.90 , q= 13.80 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.18591 mri =0.000 curv = 6.676 unmri = -1.519 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.68 , q= 13.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.68 , q= 13.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.18608 mri =0.000 curv = 1.505 unmri = 4.167 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.50 , q= 3.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.50 , q= 3.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.41617 mri =0.000 curv = 1.238 unmri = 3.463 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.24 , q= 2.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.24 , q= 2.48 ) 53 patches have been generated - 29 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -8.41617 # generated patches : 154 (71 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -560 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-560 (nv=231886, nf=464892, ne=697338) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 10 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 10: 50 vertices location: [ (169,112,44) - average intensity = 93.788 ] -gray ( 79.89 , 26.70 ) -white ( 90.72 , 29.89 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (79.886246 [log = -4.989913 ]- 90.717232 [log = -5.887207 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 78(78) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,41] BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.95107 mri =0.000 curv = 2.452 unmri = 16.144 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 6.60552 mri =0.000 curv = 3.499 unmri = -20.600 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.50 , q= 7.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.50 , q= 7.00 ) 26 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 6.60552 # generated patches : 26 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -558 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-558 (nv=231908, nf=464932, ne=697398) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 11 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 11: 108 vertices location: [ (168,79,48) - average intensity = 95.077 ] -gray ( 88.44 , 6.93 ) -white ( 99.57 , 4.28 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.438339 [log = -2.767510 ]- 99.570023 [log = -2.686397 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 190(190) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [30,86] BEST FITNESS (o)is -38.37440 mri =0.000 curv = 9.677 unmri = -0.332 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.68 , q= 19.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.68 , q= 19.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.83289 mri =0.000 curv = 3.288 unmri = -0.318 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.30482 mri =0.000 curv = 2.846 unmri = -4.078 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.69 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.23165 mri =0.000 curv = 2.867 unmri = -4.237 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.87 , q= 5.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.87 , q= 5.73 ) 61 patches have been generated - 29 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.23165 # generated patches : 61 (29 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -556 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-556 (nv=231960, nf=465032, ne=697548) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 12 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 12: 179 vertices location: [ (132,136,48) - average intensity = 94.107 ] -gray ( 85.92 , 4.82 ) -white ( 99.03 , 2.83 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.917313 [log = -2.457149 ]- 99.033134 [log = -1.970854 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 306(306) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.34553 mri =0.000 curv = 0.209 unmri = 16.511 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.31988 mri =0.000 curv = 0.210 unmri = 16.479 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.42 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -12.49844 mri =0.000 curv = 5.167 unmri = -8.171 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.17 , q= 10.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.17 , q= 10.33 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 4.66905 mri =0.000 curv = 0.930 unmri = -8.388 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.86 ) 94 patches have been generated - 36 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 4.66905 # generated patches : 94 (36 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -554 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-554 (nv=232000, nf=465108, ne=697662) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 13 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 13: 56 vertices location: [ (131,68,49) - average intensity = 93.923 ] -gray ( 88.81 , 4.25 ) -white ( 99.88 , 2.98 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.809990 [log = -2.512564 ]- 99.883034 [log = -2.035825 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 86(86) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,44] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.82945 mri =0.000 curv = 0.289 unmri = -0.326 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.29 , q= 0.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.29 , q= 0.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.81210 mri =0.000 curv = 0.285 unmri = -0.326 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.28 , q= 0.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.28 , q= 0.57 ) 28 patches have been generated - 6 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.81210 # generated patches : 28 (6 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -552 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-552 (nv=232022, nf=465148, ne=697722) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 14 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 14!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -552 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-552 (nv=232022, nf=465148, ne=697722) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 15 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 15: 58 vertices location: [ (128,77,50) - average intensity = 94.407 ] -gray ( 89.93 , 4.01 ) -white ( 99.37 , 3.81 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.925926 [log = -2.428496 ]- 99.374947 [log = -2.462632 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 91(91) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.21977 mri =0.000 curv = 0.558 unmri = -2.453 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.23828 mri =0.000 curv = 0.554 unmri = -2.454 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.25856 mri =0.000 curv = 0.549 unmri = -2.454 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.55 , q= 1.10 ) 30 patches have been generated - 5 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 0.25856 # generated patches : 30 (5 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -550 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-550 (nv=232044, nf=465188, ne=697782) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 16 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 16: 47 vertices location: [ (133,114,51) - average intensity = 92.901 ] -gray ( 83.79 , 6.56 ) -white ( 97.30 , 3.11 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (83.794785 [log = -2.550696 ]- 97.304649 [log = -1.991453 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 76(76) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,40] BEST FITNESS (o)is -51.80002 mri =0.000 curv = 13.531 unmri = -2.323 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.53 , q= 27.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.53 , q= 27.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -37.93355 mri =0.000 curv = 8.714 unmri = 3.079 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.71 , q= 17.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.71 , q= 17.43 ) 25 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -37.93355 # generated patches : 25 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -548 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-548 (nv=232088, nf=465272, ne=697908) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 17 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 17!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -548 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-548 (nv=232088, nf=465272, ne=697908) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 18 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 18: 75 vertices location: [ (165,66,53) - average intensity = 92.452 ] -gray ( 86.85 , 8.63 ) -white ( 97.62 , 3.19 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.846420 [log = -2.860923 ]- 97.615219 [log = -2.082297 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 129(129) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [20,62] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.26213 mri =0.000 curv = 1.552 unmri = 0.055 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.10 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.99496 mri =0.000 curv = 0.782 unmri = 0.866 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.78 , q= 1.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.78 , q= 1.56 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.92843 mri =0.000 curv = 0.766 unmri = 0.863 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.77 , q= 1.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.77 , q= 1.53 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.37594 mri =0.000 curv = 0.525 unmri = -1.724 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.29722 mri =0.000 curv = 0.505 unmri = -1.722 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.50 , q= 1.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.50 , q= 1.01 ) 40 patches have been generated - 19 self-intersected max face = 129(169) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [20,62] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.81849 mri =0.000 curv = 1.122 unmri = -1.668 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.12 , q= 2.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.12 , q= 2.24 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.27234 mri =0.000 curv = 0.533 unmri = -0.859 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.53 , q= 1.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.53 , q= 1.07 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.18614 mri =0.000 curv = 0.511 unmri = -0.859 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.51 , q= 1.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.51 , q= 1.02 ) 40 patches have been generated - 16 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.18614 # generated patches : 80 (35 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -544 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-544 (nv=232132, nf=465352, ne=698028) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 19 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 19: 296 vertices location: [ (146,113,56) - average intensity = 86.831 ] -gray ( 86.84 , 4.59 ) -white ( 98.30 , 2.87 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.838310 [log = -2.391149 ]- 98.299469 [log = -1.945979 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 538(538) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [82,225] BEST FITNESS (o)is -23.12524 mri =0.000 curv = 2.820 unmri = 11.844 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.82 , q= 5.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.82 , q= 5.64 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 124.87175 mri =0.000 curv = 1.721 unmri = -131.756 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.72 , q= 3.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.72 , q= 3.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 257.16464 mri =0.000 curv = 1.616 unmri = -263.628 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.23 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 287.86161 mri =0.000 curv = 2.032 unmri = -295.991 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.03 , q= 4.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.03 , q= 4.06 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 386.49065 mri =0.000 curv = 2.848 unmri = -397.884 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) 164 patches have been generated - 71 self-intersected max face = 538(630) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [82,225] BEST FITNESS (o)is 371.41289 mri =0.000 curv = 3.657 unmri = -386.041 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.66 , q= 7.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.66 , q= 7.31 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 454.63322 mri =0.000 curv = 2.474 unmri = -464.528 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.47 , q= 4.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.47 , q= 4.95 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 504.36259 mri =0.000 curv = 2.812 unmri = -515.609 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.81 , q= 5.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.81 , q= 5.62 ) 165 patches have been generated - 71 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 504.36258 # generated patches : 329 (142 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -540 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-540 (nv=232214, nf=465508, ne=698262) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 20 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 20: 801 vertices location: [ (173,129,58) - average intensity = 95.831 ] -gray ( 86.09 , 9.49 ) -white ( 99.46 , 3.40 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.089828 [log = -3.226204 ]- 99.455894 [log = -2.136883 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 1495(1495) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [225,608] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.98117 mri =0.000 curv = 1.875 unmri = 1.483 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.87 , q= 3.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.87 , q= 3.75 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -8.50142 mri =0.000 curv = 2.788 unmri = -2.651 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.79 , q= 5.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.79 , q= 5.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.98839 mri =0.000 curv = 1.773 unmri = -2.105 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.77 , q= 3.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.77 , q= 3.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.73797 mri =0.000 curv = 1.709 unmri = -5.098 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.71 , q= 3.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.71 , q= 3.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.98383 mri =0.000 curv = 2.601 unmri = -12.386 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.60 , q= 5.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.60 , q= 5.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.02009 mri =0.000 curv = 2.218 unmri = -10.893 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.22 , q= 4.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.22 , q= 4.44 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 31.44064 mri =0.000 curv = 2.148 unmri = -40.031 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.15 , q= 4.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.15 , q= 4.30 ) 488 patches have been generated - 207 self-intersected max face = 1495(1615) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [225,608] BEST FITNESS (o)is 29.19110 mri =0.000 curv = 2.340 unmri = -38.550 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.34 , q= 4.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.34 , q= 4.68 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 39.42011 mri =0.000 curv = 2.310 unmri = -48.661 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 41.96979 mri =0.000 curv = 2.771 unmri = -53.053 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.54 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 44.10837 mri =0.000 curv = 2.912 unmri = -55.758 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.91 , q= 5.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.91 , q= 5.82 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 50.56424 mri =0.000 curv = 2.570 unmri = -60.846 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.57 , q= 5.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.57 , q= 5.14 ) 494 patches have been generated - 180 self-intersected max face = 1495(1715) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [225,608] BEST FITNESS (o)is 48.35023 mri =0.000 curv = 2.753 unmri = -59.363 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.75 , q= 5.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.75 , q= 5.51 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 49.34071 mri =0.000 curv = 3.539 unmri = -63.497 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.54 , q= 7.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.54 , q= 7.08 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 52.93783 mri =0.000 curv = 2.772 unmri = -64.027 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.54 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 57.94978 mri =0.000 curv = 2.714 unmri = -68.804 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.43 ) 503 patches have been generated - 206 self-intersected max face = 1495(1755) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [225,608] BEST FITNESS (o)is 55.79352 mri =0.000 curv = 2.883 unmri = -67.324 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.77 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 59.67819 mri =0.000 curv = 2.880 unmri = -71.198 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 61.61823 mri =0.000 curv = 2.780 unmri = -72.739 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.56 ) 494 patches have been generated - 192 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 61.61823 # generated patches : 1979 (785 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -532 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-532 (nv=232388, nf=465840, ne=698760) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 21 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 21: 392 vertices location: [ (131,109,63) - average intensity = 92.533 ] -gray ( 85.13 , 5.97 ) -white ( 98.48 , 3.40 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.125336 [log = -2.933785 ]- 98.482689 [log = -2.151095 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 719(719) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [109,298] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.73873 mri =0.000 curv = 1.553 unmri = -0.473 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.86495 mri =0.000 curv = 1.407 unmri = -0.761 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.41 , q= 2.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.41 , q= 2.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.16591 mri =0.000 curv = 0.809 unmri = -3.403 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 5.18111 mri =0.000 curv = 1.333 unmri = -10.515 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.33 , q= 2.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.33 , q= 2.67 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 5.38749 mri =0.000 curv = 1.144 unmri = -9.965 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.29 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 6.17627 mri =0.000 curv = 1.080 unmri = -10.496 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.08 , q= 2.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.08 , q= 2.16 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 6.61934 mri =0.000 curv = 0.937 unmri = -10.367 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.87 ) 237 patches have been generated - 102 self-intersected max face = 719(787) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [109,298] BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.83205 mri =0.000 curv = 1.502 unmri = -10.839 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.50 , q= 3.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.50 , q= 3.00 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.36042 mri =0.000 curv = 0.939 unmri = -11.116 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.88 ) 239 patches have been generated - 114 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 7.36042 # generated patches : 476 (216 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -528 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-528 (nv=232448, nf=465952, ne=698928) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 22 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 22: 100 vertices location: [ (178,118,56) - average intensity = 93.116 ] -gray ( 78.95 , 15.33 ) -white ( 100.61 , 3.26 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (78.945221 [log = -4.649077 ]- 100.614288 [log = -2.132158 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 169(169) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [26,78] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2783.72197 mri =0.000 curv = 697.148 unmri = -4.870 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=697.15 , q= 1394.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=697.15 , q= 1394.30 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.69157 mri =0.000 curv = 0.937 unmri = 14.945 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.87 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.14826 mri =0.000 curv = 4.876 unmri = -2.357 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.88 , q= 9.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.88 , q= 9.75 ) 53 patches have been generated - 28 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -17.14826 # generated patches : 53 (28 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -526 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-526 (nv=232470, nf=465992, ne=698988) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 23 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 23: 95 vertices location: [ (127,125,58) - average intensity = 92.538 ] -gray ( 82.51 , 5.59 ) -white ( 97.54 , 2.82 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (82.513512 [log = -2.595611 ]- 97.544350 [log = -2.012988 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 156(156) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [24,72] BEST FITNESS (o)is 6.93420 mri =0.000 curv = 0.803 unmri = -10.146 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.80 , q= 1.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.80 , q= 1.61 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.03375 mri =0.000 curv = 0.258 unmri = -10.065 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.26 , q= 0.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.26 , q= 0.52 ) 48 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 9.03375 # generated patches : 48 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -524 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-524 (nv=232500, nf=466048, ne=699072) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 24 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 24: 230 vertices location: [ (180,98,61) - average intensity = 93.182 ] -gray ( 86.38 , 8.92 ) -white ( 100.31 , 2.99 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.378639 [log = -3.433088 ]- 100.312469 [log = -2.027037 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 389(389) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [59,166] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.90596 mri =0.000 curv = 0.301 unmri = -0.296 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.30 , q= 0.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.30 , q= 0.60 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.85462 mri =0.000 curv = 1.133 unmri = -8.385 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.27 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.98143 mri =0.000 curv = 1.097 unmri = -8.368 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.19 ) 119 patches have been generated - 31 self-intersected max face = 389(461) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [59,166] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.42446 mri =0.000 curv = 1.375 unmri = -4.078 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.75 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.85391 mri =0.000 curv = 1.523 unmri = -6.947 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.82468 mri =0.000 curv = 1.265 unmri = -6.885 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.27 , q= 2.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.27 , q= 2.53 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.26951 mri =0.000 curv = 1.022 unmri = -8.358 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.02 , q= 2.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.02 , q= 2.04 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 5.32949 mri =0.000 curv = 2.000 unmri = -13.329 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.00 ) 124 patches have been generated - 33 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 5.32949 # generated patches : 243 (64 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -520 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-520 (nv=232564, nf=466168, ne=699252) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 25 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 25: 74 vertices location: [ (129,90,60) - average intensity = 94.163 ] -gray ( 90.39 , 3.43 ) -white ( 101.24 , 2.80 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (90.390289 [log = -2.166172 ]- 101.241531 [log = -1.982791 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 120(120) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [19,58] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.09597 mri =0.000 curv = 0.810 unmri = 4.857 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.81 , q= 1.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -2.85673 mri =0.000 curv = 2.099 unmri = -5.538 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.20 ) 40 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.85673 # generated patches : 40 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -518 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-518 (nv=232586, nf=466208, ne=699312) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 26 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 26!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -518 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-518 (nv=232586, nf=466208, ne=699312) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 27 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 27!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -518 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-518 (nv=232586, nf=466208, ne=699312) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 28 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 28: 53 vertices location: [ (177,91,59) - average intensity = 94.242 ] -gray ( 87.47 , 6.86 ) -white ( 99.91 , 3.21 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.470924 [log = -3.395598 ]- 99.907616 [log = -2.159122 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 89(89) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -45.32295 mri =0.000 curv = 11.397 unmri = -0.266 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.40 , q= 22.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.40 , q= 22.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.42868 mri =0.000 curv = 1.033 unmri = 2.298 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.07 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.09424 mri =0.000 curv = 1.039 unmri = 1.939 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.04 , q= 2.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.04 , q= 2.08 ) 30 patches have been generated - 16 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.09423 # generated patches : 30 (16 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -516 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-516 (nv=232624, nf=466280, ne=699420) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 29 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 29: 222 vertices location: [ (181,113,62) - average intensity = 94.581 ] -gray ( 78.93 , 13.77 ) -white ( 100.34 , 2.99 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (78.931091 [log = -3.952194 ]- 100.341469 [log = -2.048562 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 388(388) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [59,165] BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.05814 mri =0.000 curv = 0.945 unmri = -6.837 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 10.64697 mri =0.000 curv = 1.407 unmri = -16.277 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.41 , q= 2.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.41 , q= 2.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 14.05331 mri =0.000 curv = 1.522 unmri = -20.142 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) 125 patches have been generated - 57 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 14.05331 # generated patches : 125 (57 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -514 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-514 (nv=232766, nf=466560, ne=699840) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 30 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 30!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -514 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-514 (nv=232766, nf=466560, ne=699840) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 31 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 31!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -514 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-514 (nv=232766, nf=466560, ne=699840) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 32 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 32: 778 vertices location: [ (180,124,70) - average intensity = 96.375 ] -gray ( 81.62 , 18.14 ) -white ( 99.64 , 15.76 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (81.617455 [log = -4.336417 ]- 99.642746 [log = -2.256494 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 1437(1437) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [217,585] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.94753 mri =0.000 curv = 1.940 unmri = 5.188 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.94 , q= 3.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.94 , q= 3.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.91757 mri =0.000 curv = 1.933 unmri = 5.186 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.93 , q= 3.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.93 , q= 3.87 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.37063 mri =0.000 curv = 2.521 unmri = -14.454 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.52 , q= 5.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.52 , q= 5.04 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 26.05969 mri =0.000 curv = 2.317 unmri = -35.328 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.63 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 36.24835 mri =0.000 curv = 2.738 unmri = -47.199 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.74 , q= 5.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.74 , q= 5.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 71.68013 mri =0.000 curv = 2.084 unmri = -80.017 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.08 , q= 4.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.08 , q= 4.17 ) 445 patches have been generated - 177 self-intersected max face = 1437(1661) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [217,585] BEST FITNESS (o)is 61.93558 mri =0.000 curv = 2.049 unmri = -70.132 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.05 , q= 4.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.05 , q= 4.10 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 85.05781 mri =0.000 curv = 2.002 unmri = -93.067 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.00 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 88.17311 mri =0.000 curv = 3.517 unmri = -102.243 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.52 , q= 7.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.52 , q= 7.03 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 115.06393 mri =0.000 curv = 4.538 unmri = -133.217 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.54 , q= 9.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.54 , q= 9.08 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 117.73696 mri =0.000 curv = 2.318 unmri = -127.008 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.64 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 117.73696 mri =0.000 curv = 2.318 unmri = -127.008 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.64 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 119.84422 mri =0.000 curv = 3.320 unmri = -133.124 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) 459 patches have been generated - 197 self-intersected max face = 1437(1725) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [217,585] BEST FITNESS (o)is 110.27488 mri =0.000 curv = 3.241 unmri = -123.239 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.24 , q= 6.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.24 , q= 6.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 122.45235 mri =0.000 curv = 3.252 unmri = -135.460 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.25 , q= 6.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.25 , q= 6.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 124.66739 mri =0.000 curv = 3.736 unmri = -139.611 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.74 , q= 7.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.74 , q= 7.47 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 135.29183 mri =0.000 curv = 3.664 unmri = -149.946 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.66 , q= 7.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.66 , q= 7.33 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 137.44136 mri =0.000 curv = 3.454 unmri = -151.259 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.45 , q= 6.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.45 , q= 6.91 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 162.99729 mri =0.000 curv = 3.574 unmri = -177.293 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.57 , q= 7.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.57 , q= 7.15 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 164.75117 mri =0.000 curv = 3.562 unmri = -179.000 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.56 , q= 7.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.56 , q= 7.12 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 166.26155 mri =0.000 curv = 3.435 unmri = -180.003 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.87 ) 436 patches have been generated - 170 self-intersected max face = 1437(1781) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [217,585] BEST FITNESS (o)is 168.80660 mri =0.000 curv = 3.333 unmri = -182.138 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.67 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 169.58508 mri =0.000 curv = 5.614 unmri = -192.041 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.61 , q= 11.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.61 , q= 11.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 169.97406 mri =0.000 curv = 4.878 unmri = -189.485 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.88 , q= 9.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.88 , q= 9.76 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 173.92954 mri =0.000 curv = 4.193 unmri = -190.703 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.19 , q= 8.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.19 , q= 8.39 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 173.93735 mri =0.000 curv = 3.708 unmri = -188.768 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 181.79492 mri =0.000 curv = 3.758 unmri = -196.825 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.76 , q= 7.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.76 , q= 7.52 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 182.83033 mri =0.000 curv = 3.643 unmri = -197.403 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.64 , q= 7.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.64 , q= 7.29 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 184.24256 mri =0.000 curv = 3.474 unmri = -198.138 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.47 , q= 6.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.47 , q= 6.95 ) 434 patches have been generated - 138 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 184.24255 # generated patches : 1774 (682 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -506 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-506 (nv=232982, nf=466976, ne=700464) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 33 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 33: 52 vertices location: [ (156,134,61) - average intensity = 94.095 ] -gray ( 90.56 , 3.46 ) -white ( 99.45 , 3.05 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (90.561440 [log = -2.162008 ]- 99.447914 [log = -2.068196 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 83(83) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,43] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.40701 mri =0.000 curv = 1.685 unmri = 1.666 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.38765 mri =0.000 curv = 1.139 unmri = 1.832 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.28 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.32405 mri =0.000 curv = 0.920 unmri = 1.646 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.92 , q= 1.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.92 , q= 1.84 ) 26 patches have been generated - 7 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -5.32405 # generated patches : 26 (7 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -504 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-504 (nv=233014, nf=467036, ne=700554) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 34 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 34!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -504 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-504 (nv=233014, nf=467036, ne=700554) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 35 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 35!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -504 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-504 (nv=233014, nf=467036, ne=700554) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 36 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 36!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -504 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-504 (nv=233014, nf=467036, ne=700554) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 37 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 37!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -504 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-504 (nv=233014, nf=467036, ne=700554) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 38 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 38: 48 vertices location: [ (131,80,68) - average intensity = 96.233 ] -gray ( 89.78 , 3.05 ) -white ( 102.95 , 3.13 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.784813 [log = -2.085119 ]- 102.951126 [log = -2.083791 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 77(77) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,41] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.45281 mri =0.000 curv = 0.406 unmri = -0.172 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.41 , q= 0.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.41 , q= 0.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.45065 mri =0.000 curv = 0.405 unmri = -0.171 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.41 , q= 0.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.41 , q= 0.81 ) 26 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.45065 # generated patches : 26 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -502 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-502 (nv=233036, nf=467076, ne=700614) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 39 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 39!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -502 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-502 (nv=233036, nf=467076, ne=700614) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 40 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 40!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -502 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-502 (nv=233036, nf=467076, ne=700614) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 41 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 41!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -502 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-502 (nv=233036, nf=467076, ne=700614) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 42 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 42: 243 vertices location: [ (174,131,73) - average intensity = 95.289 ] -gray ( 89.83 , 6.25 ) -white ( 100.58 , 3.62 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.825745 [log = -2.705984 ]- 100.579834 [log = -2.281345 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 417(417) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [64,177] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.13965 mri =0.000 curv = 2.666 unmri = -0.523 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.33 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.07201 mri =0.000 curv = 1.302 unmri = 0.865 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.60 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -5.58181 mri =0.000 curv = 2.959 unmri = -6.255 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.92148 mri =0.000 curv = 1.111 unmri = -0.522 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.22 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.88844 mri =0.000 curv = 1.250 unmri = -2.113 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.50 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -1.56524 mri =0.000 curv = 2.330 unmri = -7.753 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.33 , q= 4.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.33 , q= 4.66 ) 138 patches have been generated - 59 self-intersected max face = 417(481) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [64,177] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.87834 mri =0.000 curv = 3.289 unmri = -8.277 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.32401 mri =0.000 curv = 2.074 unmri = -4.974 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.07 , q= 4.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.07 , q= 4.15 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.28462 mri =0.000 curv = 1.826 unmri = -7.019 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) 145 patches have been generated - 86 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.28462 # generated patches : 283 (145 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -498 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-498 (nv=233196, nf=467388, ne=701082) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 43 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 43!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -498 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-498 (nv=233196, nf=467388, ne=701082) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 44 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 44: 493 vertices location: [ (181,84,75) - average intensity = 94.090 ] -gray ( 84.56 , 8.91 ) -white ( 99.64 , 4.29 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (84.560806 [log = -3.515435 ]- 99.638321 [log = -2.250418 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 859(859) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [130,354] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.67434 mri =0.000 curv = 0.097 unmri = 15.286 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.10 , q= 0.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.10 , q= 0.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.86906 mri =0.000 curv = 0.352 unmri = 13.460 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.35 , q= 0.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.35 , q= 0.70 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.67142 mri =0.000 curv = 0.116 unmri = 14.209 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.12 , q= 0.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.12 , q= 0.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 5.48981 mri =0.000 curv = 0.895 unmri = -9.068 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.89 , q= 1.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.89 , q= 1.79 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 7.12932 mri =0.000 curv = 1.071 unmri = -11.415 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.07 , q= 2.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.07 , q= 2.14 ) 349 patches have been generated - 271 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 7.12932 # generated patches : 349 (271 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -496 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-496 (nv=233256, nf=467504, ne=701256) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 45 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 45: 60 vertices location: [ (138,110,72) - average intensity = 95.687 ] -gray ( 88.13 , 8.96 ) -white ( 100.28 , 8.94 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.133713 [log = -2.563215 ]- 100.279594 [log = -2.160309 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 104(104) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [17,52] BEST FITNESS (o)is -125.21513 mri =0.000 curv = 30.040 unmri = 5.056 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.04 , q= 60.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.04 , q= 60.08 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.59614 mri =0.000 curv = 0.532 unmri = -3.723 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.53 , q= 1.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.53 , q= 1.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.64994 mri =0.000 curv = 0.519 unmri = -3.727 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.52 , q= 1.04 ) 34 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 1.64994 # generated patches : 34 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -494 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-494 (nv=233282, nf=467552, ne=701328) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 46 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 46: 143 vertices location: [ (189,111,73) - average intensity = 95.798 ] -gray ( 79.14 , 11.55 ) -white ( 101.08 , 3.09 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (79.135765 [log = -3.131948 ]- 101.077194 [log = -2.025090 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 252(252) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [39,111] BEST FITNESS (o)is -22.05948 mri =0.000 curv = 4.964 unmri = 2.204 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.96 , q= 9.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.96 , q= 9.93 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.40746 mri =0.000 curv = 3.340 unmri = 7.046 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -19.20290 mri =0.000 curv = 4.141 unmri = 2.641 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.14 , q= 8.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.14 , q= 8.28 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -7.35084 mri =0.000 curv = 4.741 unmri = -11.613 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.74 , q= 9.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.74 , q= 9.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.61219 mri =0.000 curv = 3.746 unmri = -11.372 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.75 , q= 7.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.75 , q= 7.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.25660 mri =0.000 curv = 3.106 unmri = -12.681 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.11 , q= 6.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.11 , q= 6.21 ) 78 patches have been generated - 35 self-intersected max face = 252(360) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [39,111] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.26019 mri =0.000 curv = 3.935 unmri = -10.478 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.93 , q= 7.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.93 , q= 7.87 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.01154 mri =0.000 curv = 3.012 unmri = -10.035 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.38549 mri =0.000 curv = 2.926 unmri = -14.089 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.85 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.39176 mri =0.000 curv = 2.922 unmri = -14.081 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.84 ) 79 patches have been generated - 27 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 2.39176 # generated patches : 157 (62 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -490 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-490 (nv=233378, nf=467736, ne=701604) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 47 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 47: 170 vertices location: [ (184,116,73) - average intensity = 96.456 ] -gray ( 78.66 , 28.69 ) -white ( 90.58 , 32.40 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (78.656387 [log = -4.212479 ]- 90.580009 [log = -6.192432 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 306(306) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is 15.55033 mri =0.000 curv = 2.310 unmri = -24.789 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 67.97488 mri =0.000 curv = 2.551 unmri = -78.178 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.55 , q= 5.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.55 , q= 5.10 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 93.75311 mri =0.000 curv = 3.226 unmri = -106.656 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.23 , q= 6.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.23 , q= 6.45 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 99.85315 mri =0.000 curv = 2.800 unmri = -111.053 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.60 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 101.18175 mri =0.000 curv = 3.070 unmri = -113.463 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.14 ) 95 patches have been generated - 43 self-intersected max face = 306(374) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [47,132] BEST FITNESS (o)is 124.81848 mri =0.000 curv = 3.236 unmri = -137.761 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.24 , q= 6.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.24 , q= 6.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 131.62017 mri =0.000 curv = 3.291 unmri = -144.785 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 131.63088 mri =0.000 curv = 3.291 unmri = -144.794 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 131.76901 mri =0.000 curv = 3.263 unmri = -144.819 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.26 , q= 6.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.26 , q= 6.53 ) 98 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 131.76901 # generated patches : 193 (94 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -486 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-486 (nv=233444, nf=467860, ne=701790) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 48 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 48!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -486 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-486 (nv=233444, nf=467860, ne=701790) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 49 with euler number -33 (17 loops) computing statistics for defect 49: 6000 vertices location: [ (184,113,97) - average intensity = 95.999 ] -gray ( 75.93 , 17.96 ) -white ( 100.47 , 11.85 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (75.925224 [log = -3.865272 ]- 100.473091 [log = -2.339964 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 11653(11653) - loop = 1 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.00741 mri =0.000 curv = 1.311 unmri = 18.765 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.31 , q= 2.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.31 , q= 2.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 6.42380 mri =0.000 curv = 1.323 unmri = -11.714 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.65 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 29.55180 mri =0.000 curv = 1.328 unmri = -34.865 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.33 , q= 2.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.33 , q= 2.66 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 50.93636 mri =0.000 curv = 1.621 unmri = -57.420 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.24 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 92.91623 mri =0.000 curv = 1.371 unmri = -98.401 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.37 , q= 2.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.37 , q= 2.74 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 94.35542 mri =0.000 curv = 1.659 unmri = -100.992 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.32 ) 263 patches have been generated - 143 self-intersected max face = 11653(12237) - loop = 2 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 31.45089 mri =0.000 curv = 1.662 unmri = -38.099 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.32 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 42.16272 mri =0.000 curv = 1.672 unmri = -48.851 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.67 , q= 3.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.67 , q= 3.34 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 117.78740 mri =0.000 curv = 1.757 unmri = -124.815 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.76 , q= 3.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.76 , q= 3.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 124.30186 mri =0.000 curv = 1.642 unmri = -130.871 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.28 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 132.28173 mri =0.000 curv = 1.663 unmri = -138.935 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.66 , q= 3.33 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 144.60798 mri =0.000 curv = 1.722 unmri = -151.497 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.72 , q= 3.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.72 , q= 3.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 146.71790 mri =0.000 curv = 2.750 unmri = -157.718 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.75 , q= 5.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.75 , q= 5.50 ) 262 patches have been generated - 147 self-intersected max face = 11653(12377) - loop = 3 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 126.24098 mri =0.000 curv = 2.726 unmri = -137.145 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.45 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 141.32425 mri =0.000 curv = 2.734 unmri = -152.260 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 170.21241 mri =0.000 curv = 2.832 unmri = -181.541 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 244.76295 mri =0.000 curv = 2.803 unmri = -255.974 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.61 ) 251 patches have been generated - 127 self-intersected max face = 11653(12441) - loop = 4 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 246.79788 mri =0.000 curv = 2.797 unmri = -257.987 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.59 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 249.74493 mri =0.000 curv = 2.795 unmri = -260.927 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.59 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 268.26207 mri =0.000 curv = 2.884 unmri = -279.797 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.77 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 280.77506 mri =0.000 curv = 3.010 unmri = -292.814 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.02 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 304.91526 mri =0.000 curv = 2.848 unmri = -316.309 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) 257 patches have been generated - 138 self-intersected max face = 11653(12621) - loop = 5 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 306.23147 mri =0.000 curv = 2.853 unmri = -317.645 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 328.42159 mri =0.000 curv = 2.928 unmri = -340.132 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.86 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 334.41061 mri =0.000 curv = 2.851 unmri = -345.816 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 342.46253 mri =0.000 curv = 3.047 unmri = -354.651 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.09 ) 247 patches have been generated - 128 self-intersected max face = 11653(12781) - loop = 6 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 343.78182 mri =0.000 curv = 3.051 unmri = -355.987 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.10 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 345.49204 mri =0.000 curv = 3.013 unmri = -357.543 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 350.48756 mri =0.000 curv = 3.079 unmri = -362.802 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.08 , q= 6.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.08 , q= 6.16 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 365.99548 mri =0.000 curv = 3.126 unmri = -378.499 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.13 , q= 6.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.13 , q= 6.25 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 386.30791 mri =0.000 curv = 3.379 unmri = -399.823 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.38 , q= 6.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.38 , q= 6.76 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 387.70781 mri =0.000 curv = 3.050 unmri = -399.907 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.10 ) 251 patches have been generated - 126 self-intersected max face = 11653(12825) - loop = 7 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 389.02721 mri =0.000 curv = 3.054 unmri = -401.243 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 401.59945 mri =0.000 curv = 3.613 unmri = -416.053 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 420.30555 mri =0.000 curv = 3.048 unmri = -432.499 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.05 , q= 6.10 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 425.05722 mri =0.000 curv = 3.090 unmri = -437.418 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.18 ) 283 patches have been generated - 184 self-intersected max face = 11653(12925) - loop = 8 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 426.37733 mri =0.000 curv = 3.094 unmri = -438.754 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 430.71201 mri =0.000 curv = 3.093 unmri = -443.085 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.19 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 441.39097 mri =0.000 curv = 3.284 unmri = -454.529 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.57 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 490.82916 mri =0.000 curv = 2.981 unmri = -502.755 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.98 , q= 5.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.98 , q= 5.96 ) 286 patches have been generated - 188 self-intersected max face = 11653(13089) - loop = 9 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 492.14797 mri =0.000 curv = 2.986 unmri = -504.091 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.97 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 507.16987 mri =0.000 curv = 3.174 unmri = -519.865 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.35 ) 290 patches have been generated - 201 self-intersected max face = 11653(13181) - loop = 10 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 508.49145 mri =0.000 curv = 3.177 unmri = -521.201 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.18 , q= 6.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.18 , q= 6.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 510.59916 mri =0.000 curv = 3.153 unmri = -523.211 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.15 , q= 6.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.15 , q= 6.31 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 510.85710 mri =0.000 curv = 3.211 unmri = -523.702 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.42 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 514.34442 mri =0.000 curv = 3.258 unmri = -527.375 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.26 , q= 6.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.26 , q= 6.52 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 524.71540 mri =0.000 curv = 3.306 unmri = -537.940 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.61 ) 295 patches have been generated - 205 self-intersected max face = 11653(13253) - loop = 11 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 526.03888 mri =0.000 curv = 3.309 unmri = -539.276 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 527.62369 mri =0.000 curv = 3.782 unmri = -542.754 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.78 , q= 7.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.78 , q= 7.56 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 528.40022 mri =0.000 curv = 3.344 unmri = -541.776 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.69 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 528.40532 mri =0.000 curv = 3.343 unmri = -541.777 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.69 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 531.89423 mri =0.000 curv = 3.389 unmri = -545.450 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.78 ) 306 patches have been generated - 210 self-intersected max face = 11653(13305) - loop = 12 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 533.21889 mri =0.000 curv = 3.392 unmri = -546.786 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.78 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 533.97038 mri =0.000 curv = 3.907 unmri = -549.600 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.91 , q= 7.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.91 , q= 7.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 534.77354 mri =0.000 curv = 3.719 unmri = -549.648 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.72 , q= 7.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.72 , q= 7.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 535.84582 mri =0.000 curv = 4.083 unmri = -552.179 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.08 , q= 8.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.08 , q= 8.17 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 571.89571 mri =0.000 curv = 3.439 unmri = -585.653 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) 315 patches have been generated - 248 self-intersected max face = 11653(13405) - loop = 13 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 573.22114 mri =0.000 curv = 3.442 unmri = -586.989 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 574.51884 mri =0.000 curv = 3.430 unmri = -588.238 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.43 , q= 6.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.43 , q= 6.86 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 575.88192 mri =0.000 curv = 4.116 unmri = -592.347 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.12 , q= 8.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.12 , q= 8.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 585.90648 mri =0.000 curv = 3.476 unmri = -599.811 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.48 , q= 6.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.48 , q= 6.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 608.19512 mri =0.000 curv = 3.676 unmri = -622.901 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.68 , q= 7.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.68 , q= 7.35 ) 317 patches have been generated - 259 self-intersected max face = 11653(14001) - loop = 14 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 609.52408 mri =0.000 curv = 3.678 unmri = -624.237 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.68 , q= 7.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.68 , q= 7.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 609.66702 mri =0.000 curv = 4.024 unmri = -625.765 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.02 , q= 8.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.02 , q= 8.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 612.64420 mri =0.000 curv = 4.279 unmri = -629.758 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.28 , q= 8.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.28 , q= 8.56 ) 246 patches have been generated - 130 self-intersected max face = 11653(14101) - loop = 15 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 615.12118 mri =0.000 curv = 4.295 unmri = -632.299 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.29 , q= 8.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.29 , q= 8.59 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 626.67717 mri =0.000 curv = 4.310 unmri = -643.916 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.31 , q= 8.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.31 , q= 8.62 ) 272 patches have been generated - 165 self-intersected max face = 11653(14157) - loop = 16 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 628.48340 mri =0.000 curv = 4.364 unmri = -645.941 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.36 , q= 8.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.36 , q= 8.73 ) 327 patches have been generated - 283 self-intersected max face = 11653(14201) - loop = 17 (17) - ntries = [117,4671] BEST FITNESS (o)is 466.16865 mri =0.000 curv = 4.918 unmri = -485.839 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.92 , q= 9.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.92 , q= 9.84 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 563.22748 mri =0.000 curv = 4.309 unmri = -580.463 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.31 , q= 8.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.31 , q= 8.62 ) 350 patches have been generated - 348 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 563.22748 # generated patches : 4818 (3230 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -452 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-452 (nv=234830, nf=470564, ne=705846) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 50 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 50!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -452 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-452 (nv=234830, nf=470564, ne=705846) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 51 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 51: 47 vertices location: [ (159,51,75) - average intensity = 90.643 ] -gray ( 86.76 , 7.66 ) -white ( 98.16 , 4.82 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.757851 [log = -2.799926 ]- 98.160698 [log = -2.835487 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 79(79) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,42] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.87054 mri =0.000 curv = 6.965 unmri = 0.010 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.97 , q= 13.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.97 , q= 13.93 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.86936 mri =0.000 curv = 1.433 unmri = -3.864 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.43 , q= 2.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.43 , q= 2.87 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.79687 mri =0.000 curv = 0.707 unmri = -1.031 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.71 , q= 1.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.71 , q= 1.41 ) 27 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.79687 # generated patches : 27 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -450 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-450 (nv=234862, nf=470624, ne=705936) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 52 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 52: 86 vertices location: [ (171,57,77) - average intensity = 92.272 ] -gray ( 85.34 , 7.45 ) -white ( 97.87 , 3.86 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.335953 [log = -3.431990 ]- 97.865402 [log = -2.340212 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 142(142) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [22,67] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.78807 mri =0.000 curv = 1.049 unmri = 6.591 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.05 , q= 2.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.05 , q= 2.10 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.87841 mri =0.000 curv = 2.265 unmri = -11.940 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.27 , q= 4.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.27 , q= 4.53 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 10.73557 mri =0.000 curv = 0.500 unmri = -12.734 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.50 , q= 1.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.50 , q= 1.00 ) 44 patches have been generated - 20 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 10.73557 # generated patches : 44 (20 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -448 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-448 (nv=234906, nf=470708, ne=706062) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 53 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 53: 112 vertices location: [ (191,102,82) - average intensity = 94.802 ] -gray ( 77.66 , 14.40 ) -white ( 101.25 , 3.27 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (77.659691 [log = -3.948502 ]- 101.251366 [log = -2.111585 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 197(197) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [31,89] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.07041 mri =0.000 curv = 3.067 unmri = -3.197 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.13 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.09406 mri =0.000 curv = 3.033 unmri = -9.039 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.07 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.69072 mri =0.000 curv = 2.311 unmri = -11.934 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.77192 mri =0.000 curv = 2.295 unmri = -11.952 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.30 , q= 4.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.30 , q= 4.59 ) 66 patches have been generated - 36 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 2.77192 # generated patches : 66 (36 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -446 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-446 (nv=234952, nf=470796, ne=706194) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 54 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 54: 66 vertices location: [ (136,105,80) - average intensity = 94.827 ] -gray ( 89.01 , 3.37 ) -white ( 101.00 , 3.23 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.014748 [log = -2.180935 ]- 101.002213 [log = -2.104078 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 103(103) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [16,51] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.15225 mri =0.000 curv = 0.243 unmri = -0.821 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.15120 mri =0.000 curv = 0.243 unmri = -0.822 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.13667 mri =0.000 curv = 0.240 unmri = -0.821 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.12745 mri =0.000 curv = 0.237 unmri = -0.823 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.24 , q= 0.47 ) 32 patches have been generated - 1 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.12745 # generated patches : 32 (1 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -444 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-444 (nv=234974, nf=470836, ne=706254) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 55 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 55: 33 vertices location: [ (158,46,81) - average intensity = 94.794 ] -gray ( 87.12 , 6.83 ) -white ( 98.26 , 3.93 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.116173 [log = -2.522423 ]- 98.263237 [log = -2.306786 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 56(56) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [9,32] BEST FITNESS (o)is -123.14676 mri =0.000 curv = 30.589 unmri = 0.792 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.59 , q= 61.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.59 , q= 61.18 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -60.05576 mri =0.000 curv = 15.270 unmri = -1.026 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=15.27 , q= 30.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=15.27 , q= 30.54 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.77326 mri =0.000 curv = 2.884 unmri = -0.764 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.77 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.00913 mri =0.000 curv = 1.131 unmri = -0.514 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.26 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.99183 mri =0.000 curv = 1.127 unmri = -0.514 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.25 ) 19 patches have been generated - 3 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.99183 # generated patches : 19 (3 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -442 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-442 (nv=234996, nf=470876, ne=706314) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 56 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 56: 207 vertices location: [ (184,128,83) - average intensity = 98.002 ] -gray ( 93.11 , 3.25 ) -white ( 101.35 , 4.26 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (93.106133 [log = -2.035592 ]- 101.351585 [log = -2.499923 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 378(378) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [58,161] BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.32798 mri =0.000 curv = 3.023 unmri = 12.235 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.05 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -17.27004 mri =0.000 curv = 3.514 unmri = 3.212 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.51 , q= 7.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.51 , q= 7.03 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -14.49765 mri =0.000 curv = 3.711 unmri = -0.346 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) 120 patches have been generated - 45 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.49765 # generated patches : 120 (45 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -440 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-440 (nv=235026, nf=470932, ne=706398) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 57 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 57: 66 vertices location: [ (184,76,84) - average intensity = 95.410 ] -gray ( 87.91 , 7.68 ) -white ( 100.20 , 2.48 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.912239 [log = -3.338807 ]- 100.195900 [log = -1.825027 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 109(109) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [17,54] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.73268 mri =0.000 curv = 1.750 unmri = -0.269 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.75 , q= 3.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.75 , q= 3.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.99698 mri =0.000 curv = 1.153 unmri = 1.384 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.15 , q= 2.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.15 , q= 2.31 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -5.57894 mri =0.000 curv = 2.433 unmri = -4.152 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.87 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.98497 mri =0.000 curv = 1.268 unmri = -0.086 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.27 , q= 2.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.27 , q= 2.54 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -3.84472 mri =0.000 curv = 2.004 unmri = -4.172 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.52463 mri =0.000 curv = 0.677 unmri = 0.818 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.68 , q= 1.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.68 , q= 1.35 ) 34 patches have been generated - 5 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.52463 # generated patches : 34 (5 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -438 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-438 (nv=235066, nf=471008, ne=706512) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 58 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 58: 108 vertices location: [ (135,107,86) - average intensity = 92.990 ] -gray ( 85.92 , 18.73 ) -white ( 96.05 , 20.87 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.916634 [log = -2.921405 ]- 96.052116 [log = -2.967525 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 186(186) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [29,84] BEST FITNESS (o)is -42.63832 mri =0.000 curv = 10.403 unmri = 1.028 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.40 , q= 20.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.40 , q= 20.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.95205 mri =0.000 curv = 4.280 unmri = 1.831 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.28 , q= 8.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.28 , q= 8.56 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 14.98879 mri =0.000 curv = 0.668 unmri = -17.659 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.67 , q= 1.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.67 , q= 1.34 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 17.75213 mri =0.000 curv = 0.875 unmri = -21.252 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.87 , q= 1.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.87 , q= 1.75 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 21.88257 mri =0.000 curv = 2.572 unmri = -32.170 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.57 , q= 5.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.57 , q= 5.14 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 24.56711 mri =0.000 curv = 2.320 unmri = -33.849 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.64 ) 60 patches have been generated - 26 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 24.56711 # generated patches : 60 (26 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -436 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-436 (nv=235112, nf=471096, ne=706644) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 59 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 59: 179 vertices location: [ (144,114,88) - average intensity = 94.522 ] -gray ( 87.65 , 3.38 ) -white ( 101.71 , 3.31 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.650116 [log = -2.176177 ]- 101.707886 [log = -2.029059 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 308(308) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [47,133] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.92956 mri =0.000 curv = 3.087 unmri = 3.583 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.09 , q= 6.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.81257 mri =0.000 curv = 0.373 unmri = 1.320 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.37 , q= 0.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.37 , q= 0.75 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -1.58721 mri =0.000 curv = 1.602 unmri = -4.819 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.60 , q= 3.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.60 , q= 3.20 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -1.02879 mri =0.000 curv = 1.474 unmri = -4.868 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.47 , q= 2.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.47 , q= 2.95 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 0.58146 mri =0.000 curv = 1.427 unmri = -6.288 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.43 , q= 2.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.43 , q= 2.85 ) 96 patches have been generated - 42 self-intersected max face = 308(360) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [47,133] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.00695 mri =0.000 curv = 3.440 unmri = -2.753 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.43098 mri =0.000 curv = 1.101 unmri = -4.833 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.54948 mri =0.000 curv = 1.217 unmri = -5.419 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.22 , q= 2.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.22 , q= 2.43 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.43530 mri =0.000 curv = 1.152 unmri = -6.045 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.15 , q= 2.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.15 , q= 2.30 ) 98 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected max face = 308(424) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [47,133] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.96971 mri =0.000 curv = 3.618 unmri = -2.502 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.62 , q= 7.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.62 , q= 7.24 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.78395 mri =0.000 curv = 0.927 unmri = -4.492 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.79236 mri =0.000 curv = 0.927 unmri = -4.501 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.79724 mri =0.000 curv = 0.927 unmri = -4.505 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.80654 mri =0.000 curv = 0.927 unmri = -4.515 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) 97 patches have been generated - 50 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 0.80654 # generated patches : 291 (139 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -430 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-430 (nv=235208, nf=471276, ne=706914) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 60 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 60: 461 vertices location: [ (185,95,91) - average intensity = 93.157 ] -gray ( 83.40 , 9.69 ) -white ( 99.03 , 3.17 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (83.400864 [log = -3.654683 ]- 99.026573 [log = -2.089231 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 759(759) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [115,314] BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.71653 mri =0.000 curv = 0.424 unmri = 19.019 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.85 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -19.30171 mri =0.000 curv = 0.426 unmri = 17.600 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.43 , q= 0.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.43 , q= 0.85 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.43266 mri =0.000 curv = 0.454 unmri = 15.615 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.91 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.10613 mri =0.000 curv = 0.394 unmri = 14.531 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.39 , q= 0.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.39 , q= 0.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.74479 mri =0.000 curv = 0.398 unmri = 13.152 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.40 , q= 0.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.40 , q= 0.80 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.29191 mri =0.000 curv = 0.418 unmri = 11.621 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.42 , q= 0.84 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 14.75545 mri =0.000 curv = 1.437 unmri = -20.505 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.44 , q= 2.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.44 , q= 2.87 ) 267 patches have been generated - 163 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 14.75545 # generated patches : 267 (163 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -428 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-428 (nv=235264, nf=471384, ne=707076) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 61 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 61: 71 vertices location: [ (170,133,88) - average intensity = 94.655 ] -gray ( 89.80 , 2.81 ) -white ( 99.83 , 3.50 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.800369 [log = -1.984269 ]- 99.830299 [log = -2.167696 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 114(114) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,56] BEST FITNESS (o)is -18.47456 mri =0.000 curv = 3.617 unmri = 4.009 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.62 , q= 7.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.62 , q= 7.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -14.81781 mri =0.000 curv = 3.709 unmri = -0.016 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.71 , q= 7.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.24475 mri =0.000 curv = 0.800 unmri = 0.046 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.80 , q= 1.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.80 , q= 1.60 ) 36 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.24475 # generated patches : 36 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -426 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-426 (nv=235298, nf=471448, ne=707172) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 62 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 62!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -426 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-426 (nv=235298, nf=471448, ne=707172) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 63 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 63: 109 vertices location: [ (176,132,90) - average intensity = 94.818 ] -gray ( 92.06 , 7.13 ) -white ( 99.41 , 8.43 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (92.058815 [log = -1.995254 ]- 99.407921 [log = -2.191685 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 181(181) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [28,82] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.39696 mri =0.000 curv = 0.560 unmri = -0.843 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.95020 mri =0.000 curv = 1.473 unmri = -6.840 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.47 , q= 2.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.47 , q= 2.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.49424 mri =0.000 curv = 2.227 unmri = -11.402 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.23 , q= 4.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.23 , q= 4.45 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.44550 mri =0.000 curv = 0.939 unmri = -11.201 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.94 , q= 1.88 ) 56 patches have been generated - 8 self-intersected max face = 181(253) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [28,82] BEST FITNESS (o)is 8.37035 mri =0.000 curv = 0.919 unmri = -12.044 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.92 , q= 1.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.92 , q= 1.84 ) 56 patches have been generated - 9 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 8.37035 # generated patches : 112 (17 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -422 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-422 (nv=235358, nf=471560, ne=707340) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 64 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 64: 54 vertices location: [ (138,107,90) - average intensity = 92.873 ] -gray ( 87.44 , 7.80 ) -white ( 101.94 , 4.50 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.436577 [log = -2.537335 ]- 101.939697 [log = -2.215640 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 90(90) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.83927 mri =0.000 curv = 1.495 unmri = -4.141 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.99 ) 30 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.83927 # generated patches : 30 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -420 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-420 (nv=235386, nf=471612, ne=707418) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 65 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 65: 46 vertices location: [ (141,37,90) - average intensity = 93.634 ] -gray ( 82.74 , 6.91 ) -white ( 98.09 , 2.91 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (82.735580 [log = -2.756625 ]- 98.093567 [log = -1.975855 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 71(71) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.78334 mri =0.000 curv = 0.340 unmri = 3.423 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.34 , q= 0.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.34 , q= 0.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.75522 mri =0.000 curv = 0.333 unmri = 3.424 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.33 , q= 0.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.33 , q= 0.67 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.13641 mri =0.000 curv = 1.553 unmri = -3.075 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.11 ) 24 patches have been generated - 11 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -3.13641 # generated patches : 24 (11 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -418 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-418 (nv=235412, nf=471660, ne=707490) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 66 with euler number -45 (23 loops) computing statistics for defect 66: 9578 vertices location: [ (175,104,120) - average intensity = 94.936 ] -gray ( 85.91 , 10.03 ) -white ( 101.12 , 3.50 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.907944 [log = -3.246449 ]- 101.117477 [log = -2.210246 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 18499(18499) - loop = 1 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.14916 mri =0.000 curv = 2.309 unmri = -2.089 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -3.82720 mri =0.000 curv = 2.283 unmri = -5.307 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.28 , q= 4.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.28 , q= 4.57 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 8.76942 mri =0.000 curv = 2.234 unmri = -17.703 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.23 , q= 4.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.23 , q= 4.47 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 14.43193 mri =0.000 curv = 2.253 unmri = -23.444 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.25 , q= 4.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.25 , q= 4.51 ) 187 patches have been generated - 86 self-intersected max face = 18499(18571) - loop = 2 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.90710 mri =0.000 curv = 2.542 unmri = -18.074 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.54 , q= 5.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.54 , q= 5.08 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.27566 mri =0.000 curv = 2.243 unmri = -27.248 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.24 , q= 4.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.24 , q= 4.49 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 33.91023 mri =0.000 curv = 2.486 unmri = -43.853 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.49 , q= 4.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.49 , q= 4.97 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 41.60321 mri =0.000 curv = 2.383 unmri = -51.135 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.77 ) 191 patches have been generated - 98 self-intersected max face = 18499(18823) - loop = 3 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 31.86093 mri =0.000 curv = 2.378 unmri = -41.371 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.76 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 35.37422 mri =0.000 curv = 2.401 unmri = -44.978 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.40 , q= 4.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.40 , q= 4.80 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 41.54382 mri =0.000 curv = 2.378 unmri = -51.055 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.76 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 46.75042 mri =0.000 curv = 2.414 unmri = -56.405 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.41 , q= 4.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.41 , q= 4.83 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 58.34772 mri =0.000 curv = 2.358 unmri = -67.780 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.36 , q= 4.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.36 , q= 4.72 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 60.56465 mri =0.000 curv = 2.390 unmri = -70.127 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.78 ) 190 patches have been generated - 94 self-intersected max face = 18499(18971) - loop = 4 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 62.30288 mri =0.000 curv = 2.478 unmri = -72.215 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.48 , q= 4.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.48 , q= 4.96 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 65.53939 mri =0.000 curv = 2.452 unmri = -75.346 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 67.71551 mri =0.000 curv = 2.543 unmri = -77.888 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.54 , q= 5.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.54 , q= 5.09 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 68.31092 mri =0.000 curv = 2.372 unmri = -77.800 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.74 ) 196 patches have been generated - 105 self-intersected max face = 18499(19043) - loop = 5 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 70.05575 mri =0.000 curv = 2.458 unmri = -79.889 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.92 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 72.48784 mri =0.000 curv = 2.411 unmri = -82.130 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.41 , q= 4.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.41 , q= 4.82 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 73.40963 mri =0.000 curv = 2.437 unmri = -83.157 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 77.00597 mri =0.000 curv = 2.365 unmri = -86.466 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.73 ) 195 patches have been generated - 100 self-intersected max face = 18499(19195) - loop = 6 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 78.74837 mri =0.000 curv = 2.452 unmri = -88.555 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 80.21627 mri =0.000 curv = 2.452 unmri = -90.024 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.90 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 81.37077 mri =0.000 curv = 2.386 unmri = -90.916 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.39 , q= 4.77 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 82.94483 mri =0.000 curv = 2.862 unmri = -94.393 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.86 , q= 5.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.86 , q= 5.72 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 89.88889 mri =0.000 curv = 2.372 unmri = -99.376 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.74 ) 187 patches have been generated - 92 self-intersected max face = 18499(19267) - loop = 7 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 91.63804 mri =0.000 curv = 2.457 unmri = -101.465 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.91 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 94.99085 mri =0.000 curv = 2.436 unmri = -104.733 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 95.07634 mri =0.000 curv = 2.399 unmri = -104.671 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.40 , q= 4.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.40 , q= 4.80 ) 191 patches have been generated - 97 self-intersected max face = 18499(19307) - loop = 8 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 91.81079 mri =0.000 curv = 2.404 unmri = -101.425 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.40 , q= 4.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.40 , q= 4.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 99.44218 mri =0.000 curv = 2.420 unmri = -109.120 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.84 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 109.66810 mri =0.000 curv = 2.406 unmri = -119.292 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.41 , q= 4.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.41 , q= 4.81 ) 195 patches have been generated - 114 self-intersected max face = 18499(19379) - loop = 9 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 111.41977 mri =0.000 curv = 2.490 unmri = -121.381 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.49 , q= 4.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.49 , q= 4.98 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 113.94536 mri =0.000 curv = 2.430 unmri = -123.664 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.86 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 114.03439 mri =0.000 curv = 2.427 unmri = -123.742 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.85 ) 191 patches have been generated - 102 self-intersected max face = 18499(19443) - loop = 10 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 115.78227 mri =0.000 curv = 2.512 unmri = -125.830 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.02 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 117.25074 mri =0.000 curv = 2.512 unmri = -127.299 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.02 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.02 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 117.75918 mri =0.000 curv = 2.591 unmri = -128.122 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.59 , q= 5.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.59 , q= 5.18 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 122.33134 mri =0.000 curv = 2.609 unmri = -132.768 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.61 , q= 5.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.61 , q= 5.22 ) 195 patches have been generated - 109 self-intersected max face = 18499(19499) - loop = 11 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 124.08722 mri =0.000 curv = 2.692 unmri = -134.857 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.38 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 125.07017 mri =0.000 curv = 2.616 unmri = -135.535 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 125.28590 mri =0.000 curv = 2.618 unmri = -135.756 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.62 , q= 5.24 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 125.55219 mri =0.000 curv = 2.693 unmri = -136.325 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.39 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 126.49262 mri =0.000 curv = 2.655 unmri = -137.113 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.31 ) 189 patches have been generated - 96 self-intersected max face = 18499(19547) - loop = 12 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 121.06775 mri =0.000 curv = 2.963 unmri = -132.919 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.93 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 125.31050 mri =0.000 curv = 2.668 unmri = -135.982 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.34 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 128.66944 mri =0.000 curv = 2.672 unmri = -139.359 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.34 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 128.99130 mri =0.000 curv = 2.767 unmri = -140.058 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.53 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 157.58167 mri =0.000 curv = 2.638 unmri = -168.135 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.28 ) 203 patches have been generated - 119 self-intersected max face = 18499(19735) - loop = 13 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 159.18715 mri =0.000 curv = 2.971 unmri = -171.072 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.97 , q= 5.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.97 , q= 5.94 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 160.32113 mri =0.000 curv = 2.645 unmri = -170.902 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.65 , q= 5.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.65 , q= 5.29 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 160.52029 mri =0.000 curv = 2.732 unmri = -171.448 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.46 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 166.44379 mri =0.000 curv = 2.647 unmri = -177.033 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.65 , q= 5.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.65 , q= 5.29 ) 195 patches have been generated - 110 self-intersected max face = 18499(19831) - loop = 14 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 161.44558 mri =0.000 curv = 2.707 unmri = -172.274 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 166.54086 mri =0.000 curv = 2.585 unmri = -176.881 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.59 , q= 5.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.59 , q= 5.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 166.55653 mri =0.000 curv = 2.580 unmri = -176.875 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.58 , q= 5.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.58 , q= 5.16 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 168.57664 mri =0.000 curv = 2.662 unmri = -179.225 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.32 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 170.11733 mri =0.000 curv = 2.824 unmri = -181.414 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.82 , q= 5.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.82 , q= 5.65 ) 194 patches have been generated - 114 self-intersected max face = 18499(19879) - loop = 15 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 170.63821 mri =0.000 curv = 2.840 unmri = -181.997 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.84 , q= 5.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.84 , q= 5.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 172.85983 mri =0.000 curv = 2.831 unmri = -184.182 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) 184 patches have been generated - 97 self-intersected max face = 18499(19919) - loop = 16 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 159.74578 mri =0.000 curv = 6.280 unmri = -184.866 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.28 , q= 12.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.28 , q= 12.56 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 167.46787 mri =0.000 curv = 3.130 unmri = -179.988 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.13 , q= 6.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.13 , q= 6.26 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 171.29021 mri =0.000 curv = 2.875 unmri = -182.790 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.75 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 173.57228 mri =0.000 curv = 2.957 unmri = -185.401 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.91 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 175.94014 mri =0.000 curv = 2.930 unmri = -187.659 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.86 ) 187 patches have been generated - 99 self-intersected max face = 18499(19967) - loop = 17 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 162.86429 mri =0.000 curv = 6.370 unmri = -188.343 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.37 , q= 12.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.37 , q= 12.74 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 172.32682 mri =0.000 curv = 2.919 unmri = -184.001 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.84 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 173.58596 mri =0.000 curv = 3.002 unmri = -185.595 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.00 , q= 6.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.00 , q= 6.00 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 175.44554 mri =0.000 curv = 2.916 unmri = -187.109 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.92 , q= 5.83 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 176.65536 mri =0.000 curv = 3.056 unmri = -188.878 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.06 , q= 6.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.06 , q= 6.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 176.88714 mri =0.000 curv = 2.950 unmri = -188.686 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.95 , q= 5.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.95 , q= 5.90 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 178.20377 mri =0.000 curv = 2.962 unmri = -190.052 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) 180 patches have been generated - 95 self-intersected max face = 18499(20027) - loop = 18 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 178.39950 mri =0.000 curv = 3.070 unmri = -190.680 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.14 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 179.15149 mri =0.000 curv = 2.982 unmri = -191.079 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.98 , q= 5.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.98 , q= 5.96 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 179.83479 mri =0.000 curv = 3.289 unmri = -192.989 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.58 ) 184 patches have been generated - 101 self-intersected max face = 18499(20083) - loop = 19 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 166.85033 mri =0.000 curv = 6.706 unmri = -193.674 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.71 , q= 13.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.71 , q= 13.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 175.56002 mri =0.000 curv = 3.276 unmri = -188.664 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 176.23939 mri =0.000 curv = 3.279 unmri = -189.354 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.56 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 179.34487 mri =0.000 curv = 3.274 unmri = -192.439 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.27 , q= 6.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.27 , q= 6.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 180.78734 mri =0.000 curv = 3.307 unmri = -194.016 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.61 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 180.83730 mri =0.000 curv = 3.347 unmri = -194.225 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.35 , q= 6.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.35 , q= 6.69 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 181.40664 mri =0.000 curv = 3.297 unmri = -194.596 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.59 ) 191 patches have been generated - 107 self-intersected max face = 18499(20139) - loop = 20 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 168.46448 mri =0.000 curv = 6.704 unmri = -195.280 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.70 , q= 13.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.70 , q= 13.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 177.48608 mri =0.000 curv = 3.295 unmri = -190.665 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 177.70876 mri =0.000 curv = 3.293 unmri = -190.880 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 180.27070 mri =0.000 curv = 3.310 unmri = -193.510 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 180.38553 mri =0.000 curv = 3.440 unmri = -194.147 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.44 , q= 6.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 182.35954 mri =0.000 curv = 3.316 unmri = -195.623 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.63 ) 194 patches have been generated - 111 self-intersected max face = 18499(20203) - loop = 21 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 181.75811 mri =0.000 curv = 3.385 unmri = -195.299 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.77 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 181.86961 mri =0.000 curv = 3.301 unmri = -195.073 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.60 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 182.38649 mri =0.000 curv = 3.319 unmri = -195.663 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) 211 patches have been generated - 137 self-intersected max face = 18499(20255) - loop = 22 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 181.25106 mri =0.000 curv = 3.331 unmri = -194.577 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.66 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 181.25113 mri =0.000 curv = 3.332 unmri = -194.577 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.66 ) 215 patches have been generated - 148 self-intersected max face = 18499(20311) - loop = 23 (23) - ntries = [86,7410] BEST FITNESS (o)is 143.50120 mri =0.000 curv = 3.320 unmri = -156.781 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.64 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 151.40148 mri =0.000 curv = 3.294 unmri = -164.579 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.29 , q= 6.59 ) 251 patches have been generated - 205 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 151.40147 # generated patches : 4496 (2536 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -372 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-372 (nv=236490, nf=473724, ne=710586) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 67 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 67: 135 vertices location: [ (190,125,91) - average intensity = 95.224 ] -gray ( 80.15 , 15.92 ) -white ( 100.95 , 4.14 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (80.145279 [log = -3.676424 ]- 100.954216 [log = -2.493267 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 232(232) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [36,103] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.35530 mri =0.000 curv = 0.454 unmri = -1.462 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.91 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.33524 mri =0.000 curv = 0.449 unmri = -1.462 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.45 , q= 0.90 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.31723 mri =0.000 curv = 0.443 unmri = -1.456 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.44 , q= 0.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.44 , q= 0.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.25066 mri =0.000 curv = 0.913 unmri = -5.901 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.91 , q= 1.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.91 , q= 1.83 ) 74 patches have been generated - 34 self-intersected max face = 232(288) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [36,103] BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.49010 mri =0.000 curv = 1.301 unmri = -6.693 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.60 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.67206 mri =0.000 curv = 1.254 unmri = -6.688 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 12.18655 mri =0.000 curv = 1.336 unmri = -17.530 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.34 , q= 2.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.34 , q= 2.67 ) 72 patches have been generated - 36 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 12.18655 # generated patches : 146 (70 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -368 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-368 (nv=236562, nf=473860, ne=710790) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 68 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 68: 532 vertices location: [ (177,132,107) - average intensity = 92.697 ] -gray ( 86.82 , 11.11 ) -white ( 101.52 , 3.33 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.817902 [log = -2.892597 ]- 101.521179 [log = -2.138166 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 973(973) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [147,399] BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.56368 mri =0.000 curv = 1.469 unmri = 1.688 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.47 , q= 2.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.47 , q= 2.94 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.46087 mri =0.000 curv = 1.454 unmri = 1.644 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.45 , q= 2.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.45 , q= 2.91 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -5.80414 mri =0.000 curv = 3.486 unmri = -8.138 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.49 , q= 6.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.49 , q= 6.97 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -2.02823 mri =0.000 curv = 2.532 unmri = -8.099 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.53 , q= 5.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.53 , q= 5.06 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -1.90545 mri =0.000 curv = 2.151 unmri = -6.700 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.15 , q= 4.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.15 , q= 4.30 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 5.11957 mri =0.000 curv = 1.705 unmri = -11.939 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.70 , q= 3.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.70 , q= 3.41 ) 299 patches have been generated - 94 self-intersected max face = 973(1061) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [147,399] BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.49113 mri =0.000 curv = 1.649 unmri = -10.086 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.65 , q= 3.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.65 , q= 3.30 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.74180 mri =0.000 curv = 1.624 unmri = -10.238 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.74744 mri =0.000 curv = 1.624 unmri = -10.242 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.75555 mri =0.000 curv = 1.624 unmri = -10.251 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.25 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 10.06352 mri =0.000 curv = 2.254 unmri = -19.079 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.25 , q= 4.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.25 , q= 4.51 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 10.30704 mri =0.000 curv = 1.897 unmri = -17.896 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.90 , q= 3.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.90 , q= 3.79 ) 303 patches have been generated - 102 self-intersected max face = 973(1117) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [147,399] BEST FITNESS (o)is -70.63871 mri =0.000 curv = 1.860 unmri = 63.198 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.86 , q= 3.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.86 , q= 3.72 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -62.77817 mri =0.000 curv = 2.015 unmri = 54.720 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.01 , q= 4.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.01 , q= 4.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.78447 mri =0.000 curv = 2.235 unmri = 17.845 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.23 , q= 4.47 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.23 , q= 4.47 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.87397 mri =0.000 curv = 2.202 unmri = 3.066 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.20 , q= 4.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.20 , q= 4.40 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.67299 mri =0.000 curv = 2.607 unmri = -1.754 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.61 , q= 5.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.61 , q= 5.21 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.07724 mri =0.000 curv = 2.828 unmri = -18.391 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 8.14628 mri =0.000 curv = 2.664 unmri = -18.800 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.33 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.97560 mri =0.000 curv = 1.814 unmri = -17.230 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.63 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 10.62379 mri =0.000 curv = 2.640 unmri = -21.183 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.28 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 13.15704 mri =0.000 curv = 2.419 unmri = -22.832 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.84 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 13.75097 mri =0.000 curv = 2.170 unmri = -22.431 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.17 , q= 4.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.17 , q= 4.34 ) 320 patches have been generated - 149 self-intersected max face = 973(1189) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [147,399] BEST FITNESS (o)is -22.14061 mri =0.000 curv = 2.159 unmri = 13.505 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.32 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.92375 mri =0.000 curv = 2.362 unmri = -4.523 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.36 , q= 4.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.36 , q= 4.72 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.50437 mri =0.000 curv = 2.719 unmri = -7.372 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.72 , q= 5.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.72 , q= 5.44 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.45660 mri =0.000 curv = 2.702 unmri = -7.352 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.40 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 7.65297 mri =0.000 curv = 2.829 unmri = -18.969 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.83 , q= 5.66 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 14.20402 mri =0.000 curv = 2.498 unmri = -24.194 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.50 , q= 5.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.50 , q= 5.00 ) 396 patches have been generated - 299 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 14.20402 # generated patches : 1318 (644 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -360 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-360 (nv=236742, nf=474204, ne=711306) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 69 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 69!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -360 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-360 (nv=236742, nf=474204, ne=711306) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 70 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 70: 37 vertices location: [ (181,72,93) - average intensity = 94.278 ] -gray ( 88.27 , 6.41 ) -white ( 98.17 , 3.05 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.265282 [log = -2.980868 ]- 98.165565 [log = -2.057159 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 61(61) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [10,34] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.67808 mri =0.000 curv = 3.406 unmri = 2.054 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.41 , q= 6.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.41 , q= 6.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.54596 mri =0.000 curv = 2.067 unmri = -0.722 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.07 , q= 4.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.07 , q= 4.13 ) 21 patches have been generated - 9 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -7.54596 # generated patches : 21 (9 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -358 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-358 (nv=236764, nf=474244, ne=711366) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 71 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 71!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -358 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-358 (nv=236764, nf=474244, ne=711366) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 72 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 72!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -358 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-358 (nv=236764, nf=474244, ne=711366) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 73 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 73: 196 vertices location: [ (140,105,94) - average intensity = 91.873 ] -gray ( 76.48 , 20.76 ) -white ( 91.41 , 22.42 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (76.476044 [log = -4.912684 ]- 91.410645 [log = -3.874253 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 337(337) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [52,145] BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.35015 mri =0.000 curv = 1.485 unmri = 11.409 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.97 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -16.51797 mri =0.000 curv = 7.939 unmri = -15.238 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.94 , q= 15.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.94 , q= 15.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 17.62791 mri =0.000 curv = 0.287 unmri = -18.776 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.29 , q= 0.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.29 , q= 0.57 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.00706 mri =0.000 curv = 0.208 unmri = -18.841 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.29041 mri =0.000 curv = 0.207 unmri = -19.117 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.21 , q= 0.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 19.31152 mri =0.000 curv = 0.713 unmri = -22.165 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.71 , q= 1.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.71 , q= 1.43 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 19.53859 mri =0.000 curv = 0.334 unmri = -20.873 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.33 , q= 0.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.33 , q= 0.67 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 93.21961 mri =0.000 curv = 1.209 unmri = -98.055 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 96.44408 mri =0.000 curv = 1.489 unmri = -102.402 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.98 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 162.30415 mri =0.000 curv = 5.482 unmri = -184.231 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.48 , q= 10.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.48 , q= 10.96 ) 105 patches have been generated - 36 self-intersected max face = 337(517) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [52,145] BEST FITNESS (o)is 152.92930 mri =0.000 curv = 5.595 unmri = -175.308 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.59 , q= 11.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.59 , q= 11.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 171.49312 mri =0.000 curv = 4.770 unmri = -190.572 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.77 , q= 9.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.77 , q= 9.54 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 177.70217 mri =0.000 curv = 8.750 unmri = -212.701 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.75 , q= 17.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.75 , q= 17.50 ) 104 patches have been generated - 51 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 177.70216 # generated patches : 209 (87 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=236946, nf=474600, ne=711900) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 74 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 74!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=236946, nf=474600, ne=711900) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 75 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 75!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=236946, nf=474600, ne=711900) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 76 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 76!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=236946, nf=474600, ne=711900) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 77 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 77!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=236946, nf=474600, ne=711900) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 78 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 78!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -354 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-354 (nv=236946, nf=474600, ne=711900) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 79 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 79: 62 vertices location: [ (172,131,98) - average intensity = 91.531 ] -gray ( 89.18 , 2.70 ) -white ( 98.35 , 3.97 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.184471 [log = -1.882821 ]- 98.347229 [log = -2.370214 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 112(112) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,55] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.67598 mri =0.000 curv = 4.586 unmri = -6.669 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.59 , q= 9.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.59 , q= 9.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.48777 mri =0.000 curv = 2.500 unmri = -5.512 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.50 , q= 5.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.50 , q= 5.00 ) 37 patches have been generated - 16 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -4.48777 # generated patches : 37 (16 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -352 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-352 (nv=236976, nf=474656, ne=711984) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 80 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 80: 43 vertices location: [ (185,137,99) - average intensity = 87.821 ] -gray ( 81.31 , 33.33 ) -white ( 99.13 , 5.23 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (81.314690 [log = -4.230665 ]- 99.126762 [log = -2.463431 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 66(66) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [11,36] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.24038 mri =0.000 curv = 1.240 unmri = -0.719 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.24 , q= 2.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.24 , q= 2.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.92979 mri =0.000 curv = 0.169 unmri = 2.252 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.17 , q= 0.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.17 , q= 0.34 ) 23 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -2.92979 # generated patches : 23 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -350 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-350 (nv=237002, nf=474704, ne=712056) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 81 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 81!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -350 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-350 (nv=237002, nf=474704, ne=712056) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 82 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 82!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -350 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-350 (nv=237002, nf=474704, ne=712056) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 83 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 83: 52 vertices location: [ (158,55,102) - average intensity = 92.605 ] -gray ( 86.82 , 3.26 ) -white ( 98.02 , 2.56 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.823219 [log = -2.074542 ]- 98.018303 [log = -1.856364 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 89(89) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -49.23195 mri =0.000 curv = 12.354 unmri = -0.183 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.35 , q= 24.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.35 , q= 24.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -42.38695 mri =0.000 curv = 10.621 unmri = -0.097 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.62 , q= 21.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.62 , q= 21.24 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.02428 mri =0.000 curv = 1.973 unmri = 1.134 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.97 , q= 3.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.97 , q= 3.95 ) 29 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -9.02428 # generated patches : 29 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -348 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-348 (nv=237032, nf=474760, ne=712140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 84 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 84!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -348 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-348 (nv=237032, nf=474760, ne=712140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 85 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 85: 123 vertices location: [ (188,80,109) - average intensity = 96.233 ] -gray ( 81.73 , 9.77 ) -white ( 100.98 , 2.76 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (81.729012 [log = -3.204890 ]- 100.982246 [log = -1.957201 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 207(207) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [32,93] BEST FITNESS (o)is -38.13448 mri =0.000 curv = 1.177 unmri = 33.428 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.18 , q= 2.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.18 , q= 2.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.19118 mri =0.000 curv = 2.128 unmri = -8.702 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.26 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.86179 mri =0.000 curv = 1.740 unmri = -9.821 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.74 , q= 3.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.74 , q= 3.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.08975 mri =0.000 curv = 3.837 unmri = -18.438 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.84 , q= 7.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.84 , q= 7.67 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.72961 mri =0.000 curv = 1.906 unmri = -17.354 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.91 , q= 3.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 12.74117 mri =0.000 curv = 1.453 unmri = -18.552 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.45 , q= 2.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.45 , q= 2.91 ) 67 patches have been generated - 34 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 12.74117 # generated patches : 67 (34 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -346 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-346 (nv=237090, nf=474872, ne=712308) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 86 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 86!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -346 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-346 (nv=237090, nf=474872, ne=712308) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 87 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 87!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -346 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-346 (nv=237090, nf=474872, ne=712308) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 88 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 88: 308 vertices location: [ (173,74,113) - average intensity = 94.211 ] -gray ( 85.20 , 5.20 ) -white ( 99.15 , 3.04 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.199318 [log = -2.604061 ]- 99.152184 [log = -2.058081 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 506(506) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [77,212] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.77546 mri =0.000 curv = 2.852 unmri = 19.368 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.73793 mri =0.000 curv = 2.852 unmri = 19.331 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.68496 mri =0.000 curv = 2.853 unmri = 19.271 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.47865 mri =0.000 curv = 3.005 unmri = 18.460 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.00 , q= 6.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.00 , q= 6.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.35016 mri =0.000 curv = 3.341 unmri = 16.987 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.95560 mri =0.000 curv = 2.447 unmri = 15.169 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.45 , q= 4.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.74665 mri =0.000 curv = 2.436 unmri = 15.001 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) 183 patches have been generated - 117 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -24.74665 # generated patches : 183 (117 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -344 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-344 (nv=237196, nf=475080, ne=712620) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 89 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 89: 207 vertices location: [ (185,85,111) - average intensity = 96.555 ] -gray ( 86.93 , 9.01 ) -white ( 100.57 , 3.49 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.927498 [log = -3.900393 ]- 100.573128 [log = -2.173475 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 355(355) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [54,152] BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.24271 mri =0.000 curv = 1.229 unmri = 15.326 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.23 , q= 2.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.23 , q= 2.46 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.77888 mri =0.000 curv = 0.897 unmri = 3.191 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.90 , q= 1.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.90 , q= 1.79 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 8.38226 mri =0.000 curv = 1.592 unmri = -14.749 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.18 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 10.51613 mri =0.000 curv = 1.809 unmri = -17.751 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 13.59831 mri =0.000 curv = 1.316 unmri = -18.861 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.63 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 13.87241 mri =0.000 curv = 1.211 unmri = -18.718 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.42 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 25.11903 mri =0.000 curv = 1.554 unmri = -31.335 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.11 ) 112 patches have been generated - 25 self-intersected max face = 355(511) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [54,152] BEST FITNESS (o)is 29.78507 mri =0.000 curv = 1.395 unmri = -35.364 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.39 , q= 2.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.39 , q= 2.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 29.79254 mri =0.000 curv = 1.394 unmri = -35.368 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.39 , q= 2.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.39 , q= 2.79 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 31.34456 mri =0.000 curv = 1.828 unmri = -38.656 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.66 ) 136 patches have been generated - 72 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 31.34456 # generated patches : 248 (97 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -340 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-340 (nv=237310, nf=475300, ne=712950) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 90 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 90: 43 vertices location: [ (168,96,111) - average intensity = 93.344 ] -gray ( 89.26 , 2.80 ) -white ( 100.90 , 2.98 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.261497 [log = -1.981793 ]- 100.895096 [log = -2.059112 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 71(71) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [12,38] BEST FITNESS (o)is -170.73888 mri =0.000 curv = 42.905 unmri = -0.880 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=42.90 , q= 85.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=42.90 , q= 85.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -73.68539 mri =0.000 curv = 18.182 unmri = 0.959 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=18.18 , q= 36.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=18.18 , q= 36.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -32.40506 mri =0.000 curv = 6.907 unmri = 4.777 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.91 , q= 13.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.91 , q= 13.81 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -32.00843 mri =0.000 curv = 7.467 unmri = 2.141 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.47 , q= 14.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.47 , q= 14.93 ) 24 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -32.00843 # generated patches : 24 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -338 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-338 (nv=237340, nf=475356, ne=713034) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 91 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 91: 38 vertices location: [ (135,42,111) - average intensity = 95.036 ] -gray ( 89.43 , 5.96 ) -white ( 99.05 , 3.26 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.427727 [log = -2.800680 ]- 99.052101 [log = -2.196958 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 62(62) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [10,35] BEST FITNESS (o)is -27.31704 mri =0.000 curv = 6.938 unmri = -0.434 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.94 , q= 13.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.94 , q= 13.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -19.00033 mri =0.000 curv = 4.899 unmri = -0.595 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.90 , q= 9.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.90 , q= 9.80 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.19785 mri =0.000 curv = 3.725 unmri = 2.298 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.73 , q= 7.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.73 , q= 7.45 ) 21 patches have been generated - 12 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -17.19785 # generated patches : 21 (12 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -336 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-336 (nv=237368, nf=475408, ne=713112) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 92 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 92!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -336 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-336 (nv=237368, nf=475408, ne=713112) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 93 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 93!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -336 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-336 (nv=237368, nf=475408, ne=713112) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 94 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 94: 55 vertices location: [ (164,118,112) - average intensity = 77.067 ] -gray ( 81.71 , 6.24 ) -white ( 93.19 , 10.04 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (81.711060 [log = -2.569777 ]- 93.188301 [log = -4.645869 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 91(91) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -160.34670 mri =0.000 curv = 23.529 unmri = 66.230 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=23.53 , q= 47.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=23.53 , q= 47.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -58.58147 mri =0.000 curv = 21.022 unmri = -25.508 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.02 , q= 42.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.02 , q= 42.04 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -40.92756 mri =0.000 curv = 21.122 unmri = -43.559 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.12 , q= 42.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.12 , q= 42.24 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 21.66418 mri =0.000 curv = 17.504 unmri = -91.679 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.50 , q= 35.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.50 , q= 35.01 ) 31 patches have been generated - 15 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 21.66418 # generated patches : 31 (15 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -334 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-334 (nv=237394, nf=475456, ne=713184) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 95 with euler number -9 (5 loops) computing statistics for defect 95: 1152 vertices location: [ (188,127,121) - average intensity = 94.486 ] -gray ( 80.19 , 14.27 ) -white ( 99.59 , 4.48 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (80.185776 [log = -4.073774 ]- 99.588051 [log = -2.534774 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 2150(2150) - loop = 1 (5) - ntries = [324,870] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.13212 mri =0.000 curv = 1.557 unmri = 4.906 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.56 , q= 3.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.56 , q= 3.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.94529 mri =0.000 curv = 1.480 unmri = -3.973 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.48 , q= 2.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.48 , q= 2.96 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.99113 mri =0.000 curv = 1.555 unmri = -5.229 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.56 , q= 3.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.56 , q= 3.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.63606 mri =0.000 curv = 1.382 unmri = -15.166 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.76 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 35.85305 mri =0.000 curv = 1.487 unmri = -41.800 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.49 , q= 2.97 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 36.95636 mri =0.000 curv = 1.807 unmri = -44.186 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.81 , q= 3.61 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 59.15635 mri =0.000 curv = 1.674 unmri = -65.852 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.67 , q= 3.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.67 , q= 3.35 ) 692 patches have been generated - 329 self-intersected max face = 2150(2198) - loop = 2 (5) - ntries = [324,870] BEST FITNESS (o)is 53.76660 mri =0.000 curv = 1.795 unmri = -60.946 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.79 , q= 3.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.79 , q= 3.59 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 74.63834 mri =0.000 curv = 1.595 unmri = -81.018 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 76.68156 mri =0.000 curv = 1.593 unmri = -83.054 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.59 , q= 3.19 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 97.16311 mri =0.000 curv = 2.516 unmri = -107.227 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.52 , q= 5.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.52 , q= 5.03 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 106.45737 mri =0.000 curv = 1.876 unmri = -113.962 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.88 , q= 3.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.88 , q= 3.75 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 110.58362 mri =0.000 curv = 2.193 unmri = -119.357 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.19 , q= 4.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.19 , q= 4.39 ) 708 patches have been generated - 351 self-intersected max face = 2150(2326) - loop = 3 (5) - ntries = [324,870] BEST FITNESS (o)is 105.26483 mri =0.000 curv = 2.297 unmri = -114.451 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.30 , q= 4.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.30 , q= 4.59 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 117.17819 mri =0.000 curv = 2.152 unmri = -125.787 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.15 , q= 4.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.15 , q= 4.30 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 119.00730 mri =0.000 curv = 2.178 unmri = -127.720 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.18 , q= 4.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.18 , q= 4.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 119.05251 mri =0.000 curv = 2.158 unmri = -127.685 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.32 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 122.61257 mri =0.000 curv = 2.300 unmri = -131.812 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.30 , q= 4.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.30 , q= 4.60 ) 709 patches have been generated - 376 self-intersected max face = 2150(2446) - loop = 4 (5) - ntries = [324,870] BEST FITNESS (o)is 117.40680 mri =0.000 curv = 2.375 unmri = -126.906 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.75 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 127.55079 mri =0.000 curv = 2.373 unmri = -137.044 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.37 , q= 4.75 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 129.64775 mri =0.000 curv = 2.804 unmri = -140.866 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.61 ) 739 patches have been generated - 438 self-intersected max face = 2150(2510) - loop = 5 (5) - ntries = [324,870] BEST FITNESS (o)is 63.10251 mri =0.000 curv = 2.776 unmri = -74.208 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 193.01342 mri =0.000 curv = 3.820 unmri = -208.293 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.82 , q= 7.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.82 , q= 7.64 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 193.45277 mri =0.000 curv = 3.917 unmri = -209.121 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.92 , q= 7.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.92 , q= 7.83 ) 906 patches have been generated - 798 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 193.45277 # generated patches : 3754 (2292 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -324 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-324 (nv=237684, nf=476016, ne=714024) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 96 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 96!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -324 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-324 (nv=237684, nf=476016, ne=714024) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 97 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 97!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -324 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-324 (nv=237684, nf=476016, ne=714024) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 98 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 98: 271 vertices location: [ (153,117,119) - average intensity = 91.773 ] -gray ( 83.08 , 10.18 ) -white ( 98.00 , 6.25 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (83.079857 [log = -3.364133 ]- 97.998444 [log = -2.702993 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 507(507) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [77,213] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.31515 mri =0.000 curv = 1.189 unmri = -2.441 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.19 , q= 2.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.19 , q= 2.38 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 9.20746 mri =0.000 curv = 1.425 unmri = -14.909 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.43 , q= 2.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.43 , q= 2.85 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 9.24824 mri =0.000 curv = 1.397 unmri = -14.836 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.40 , q= 2.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.40 , q= 2.79 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 9.37831 mri =0.000 curv = 1.347 unmri = -14.765 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.35 , q= 2.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.35 , q= 2.69 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 9.54074 mri =0.000 curv = 1.318 unmri = -14.812 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.64 ) 156 patches have been generated - 62 self-intersected max face = 507(547) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [77,213] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.90894 mri =0.000 curv = 2.272 unmri = -3.181 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.27 , q= 4.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.27 , q= 4.54 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 3.38574 mri =0.000 curv = 1.638 unmri = -9.938 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.28 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 8.37734 mri =0.000 curv = 2.168 unmri = -17.049 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.17 , q= 4.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.17 , q= 4.34 ) 171 patches have been generated - 90 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 8.37734 # generated patches : 327 (152 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -320 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-320 (nv=237758, nf=476156, ne=714234) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 99 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 99!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -320 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-320 (nv=237758, nf=476156, ne=714234) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 100 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 100!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -320 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-320 (nv=237758, nf=476156, ne=714234) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 101 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 101!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -320 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-320 (nv=237758, nf=476156, ne=714234) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 102 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 102: 112 vertices location: [ (146,38,119) - average intensity = 94.133 ] -gray ( 85.23 , 7.54 ) -white ( 97.09 , 2.66 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.231537 [log = -3.617560 ]- 97.093002 [log = -1.913362 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 200(200) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [31,90] BEST FITNESS (o)is -21.76857 mri =0.000 curv = 4.939 unmri = 2.014 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.94 , q= 9.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.94 , q= 9.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.16120 mri =0.000 curv = 2.317 unmri = 4.895 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.32 , q= 4.63 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.03313 mri =0.000 curv = 1.598 unmri = -3.360 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.60 , q= 3.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.60 , q= 3.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.76093 mri =0.000 curv = 1.249 unmri = -4.233 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.50 ) 63 patches have been generated - 30 self-intersected max face = 200(248) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [31,90] BEST FITNESS (o)is -240.40290 mri =0.000 curv = 61.475 unmri = -5.496 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=61.47 , q= 122.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=61.47 , q= 122.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.24851 mri =0.000 curv = 1.645 unmri = -6.331 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.64 , q= 3.29 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.71205 mri =0.000 curv = 1.027 unmri = -8.819 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.72593 mri =0.000 curv = 1.026 unmri = -8.831 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 6.72233 mri =0.000 curv = 1.054 unmri = -10.940 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.05 , q= 2.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.05 , q= 2.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 6.97198 mri =0.000 curv = 1.035 unmri = -11.111 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.07 ) 66 patches have been generated - 34 self-intersected max face = 200(304) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [31,90] BEST FITNESS (o)is -462.96170 mri =0.000 curv = 118.798 unmri = -12.230 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=118.80 , q= 237.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=118.80 , q= 237.60 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.44571 mri =0.000 curv = 1.228 unmri = -3.467 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.23 , q= 2.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.23 , q= 2.46 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.90208 mri =0.000 curv = 1.006 unmri = -3.122 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.01 , q= 2.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.01 , q= 2.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.06338 mri =0.000 curv = 4.169 unmri = -16.612 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.17 , q= 8.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.17 , q= 8.34 ) 66 patches have been generated - 33 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -0.06338 # generated patches : 195 (97 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -314 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-314 (nv=237860, nf=476348, ne=714522) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 103 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 103: 95 vertices location: [ (142,47,123) - average intensity = 93.150 ] -gray ( 88.91 , 5.96 ) -white ( 99.03 , 3.36 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.908775 [log = -2.645151 ]- 99.025520 [log = -2.191639 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 164(164) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [26,76] BEST FITNESS (o)is -34.88759 mri =0.000 curv = 7.528 unmri = 4.775 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.53 , q= 15.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.53 , q= 15.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.52162 mri =0.000 curv = 6.415 unmri = 0.861 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.42 , q= 12.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.42 , q= 12.83 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.55015 mri =0.000 curv = 4.943 unmri = 0.780 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.94 , q= 9.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.94 , q= 9.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.48622 mri =0.000 curv = 5.024 unmri = 0.391 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.02 , q= 10.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.02 , q= 10.05 ) 57 patches have been generated - 32 self-intersected max face = 164(204) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [26,76] BEST FITNESS (o)is -102.06865 mri =0.000 curv = 24.976 unmri = 2.164 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=24.98 , q= 49.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=24.98 , q= 49.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -26.30863 mri =0.000 curv = 3.864 unmri = 10.852 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.86 , q= 7.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.86 , q= 7.73 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.44407 mri =0.000 curv = 3.614 unmri = 9.990 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) 59 patches have been generated - 34 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -24.44407 # generated patches : 116 (66 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -310 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-310 (nv=237948, nf=476516, ne=714774) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 104 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 104: 725 vertices location: [ (184,85,126) - average intensity = 92.023 ] -gray ( 75.84 , 12.12 ) -white ( 99.69 , 3.41 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (75.836243 [log = -3.567275 ]- 99.694351 [log = -2.219358 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 1328(1328) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [200,541] BEST FITNESS (o)is -213.80898 mri =0.000 curv = 1.411 unmri = 208.164 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.41 , q= 2.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.41 , q= 2.82 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 4.93439 mri =0.000 curv = 1.088 unmri = -9.285 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.18 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 5.06075 mri =0.000 curv = 1.154 unmri = -9.677 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.15 , q= 2.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.15 , q= 2.31 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 5.54648 mri =0.000 curv = 1.066 unmri = -9.811 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.07 , q= 2.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.07 , q= 2.13 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 5.77555 mri =0.000 curv = 1.093 unmri = -10.146 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.09 , q= 2.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 6.10603 mri =0.000 curv = 1.175 unmri = -10.805 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.17 , q= 2.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.17 , q= 2.35 ) 449 patches have been generated - 239 self-intersected max face = 1328(1416) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [200,541] BEST FITNESS (o)is -35.73817 mri =0.000 curv = 1.303 unmri = 30.527 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.61 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.61 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -29.54142 mri =0.000 curv = 5.507 unmri = 7.514 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.51 , q= 11.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.51 , q= 11.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.84056 mri =0.000 curv = 2.098 unmri = 3.447 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.81129 mri =0.000 curv = 2.114 unmri = 3.354 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.11 , q= 4.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.11 , q= 4.23 ) 469 patches have been generated - 276 self-intersected max face = 1328(1680) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [200,541] BEST FITNESS (o)is -90.20649 mri =0.000 curv = 1.979 unmri = 82.289 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.98 , q= 3.96 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.98 , q= 3.96 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -58.05491 mri =0.000 curv = 2.681 unmri = 47.332 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.36 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.36 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -47.05032 mri =0.000 curv = 2.130 unmri = 38.530 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.26 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -44.02742 mri =0.000 curv = 2.772 unmri = 32.941 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.54 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -43.49911 mri =0.000 curv = 1.946 unmri = 35.717 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.95 , q= 3.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.95 , q= 3.89 ) 465 patches have been generated - 260 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -43.49911 # generated patches : 1383 (775 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -304 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-304 (nv=238254, nf=477116, ne=715674) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 105 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 105: 110 vertices location: [ (130,88,126) - average intensity = 94.096 ] -gray ( 103.97 , 10.94 ) -white ( 107.90 , 9.38 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (103.974991 [log = -3.916523 ]- 107.896576 [log = -2.906217 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 201(201) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [31,90] BEST FITNESS (o)is -55.86581 mri =0.000 curv = 8.330 unmri = 22.548 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.66 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.33 , q= 16.66 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 19.16831 mri =0.000 curv = 2.246 unmri = -28.153 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.25 , q= 4.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.25 , q= 4.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 19.17333 mri =0.000 curv = 2.245 unmri = -28.152 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.24 , q= 4.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.24 , q= 4.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.37755 mri =0.000 curv = 2.311 unmri = -30.623 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.31 , q= 4.62 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 355.76420 mri =0.000 curv = 4.652 unmri = -374.374 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.65 , q= 9.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.65 , q= 9.30 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 377.91198 mri =0.000 curv = 4.948 unmri = -397.705 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.95 , q= 9.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.95 , q= 9.90 ) 62 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected max face = 201(273) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [31,90] BEST FITNESS (o)is 335.88822 mri =0.000 curv = 8.628 unmri = -370.401 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.63 , q= 17.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.63 , q= 17.26 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 388.55350 mri =0.000 curv = 4.203 unmri = -405.367 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.20 , q= 8.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.20 , q= 8.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 388.56315 mri =0.000 curv = 4.203 unmri = -405.375 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.20 , q= 8.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.20 , q= 8.41 ) 62 patches have been generated - 31 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 388.56314 # generated patches : 124 (49 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -300 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-300 (nv=238314, nf=477228, ne=715842) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 106 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 106!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -300 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-300 (nv=238314, nf=477228, ne=715842) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 107 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 107: 35 vertices location: [ (161,54,124) - average intensity = 94.293 ] -gray ( 88.14 , 7.23 ) -white ( 98.70 , 3.13 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.139107 [log = -3.172692 ]- 98.704887 [log = -2.138033 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 56(56) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [9,32] BEST FITNESS (o)is -46.20744 mri =0.000 curv = 11.527 unmri = 0.099 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.53 , q= 23.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.53 , q= 23.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.72955 mri =0.000 curv = 2.992 unmri = -0.238 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.98 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.32178 mri =0.000 curv = 1.986 unmri = 1.376 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.99 , q= 3.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.99 , q= 3.97 ) 18 patches have been generated - 8 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -9.32178 # generated patches : 18 (8 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -298 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-298 (nv=238336, nf=477268, ne=715902) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 108 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 108: 126 vertices location: [ (191,123,128) - average intensity = 94.386 ] -gray ( 84.67 , 12.05 ) -white ( 100.27 , 3.69 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (84.669746 [log = -3.266150 ]- 100.265160 [log = -2.231331 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 212(212) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [33,95] BEST FITNESS (o)is -35.25343 mri =0.000 curv = 7.274 unmri = 6.159 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.27 , q= 14.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.27 , q= 14.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -34.94366 mri =0.000 curv = 7.348 unmri = 5.553 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.35 , q= 14.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.35 , q= 14.70 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.75492 mri =0.000 curv = 6.495 unmri = 4.775 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.49 , q= 12.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.49 , q= 12.99 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -29.40393 mri =0.000 curv = 6.161 unmri = 4.760 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.16 , q= 12.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.16 , q= 12.32 ) 70 patches have been generated - 37 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -29.40393 # generated patches : 70 (37 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -296 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-296 (nv=238406, nf=477404, ne=716106) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 109 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 109!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -296 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-296 (nv=238406, nf=477404, ne=716106) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 110 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 110: 181 vertices location: [ (161,46,131) - average intensity = 91.842 ] -gray ( 87.73 , 6.38 ) -white ( 96.86 , 2.64 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.732880 [log = -2.767031 ]- 96.860100 [log = -1.901276 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 332(332) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [51,143] BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.34145 mri =0.000 curv = 2.419 unmri = -1.336 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.84 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.79415 mri =0.000 curv = 1.240 unmri = -5.755 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.24 , q= 2.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.24 , q= 2.48 ) 104 patches have been generated - 44 self-intersected max face = 332(404) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [51,143] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.31304 mri =0.000 curv = 2.101 unmri = -7.091 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.10 , q= 4.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.28113 mri =0.000 curv = 2.093 unmri = -7.091 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.09 , q= 4.19 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.09 , q= 4.19 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.22761 mri =0.000 curv = 2.079 unmri = -7.090 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.08 , q= 4.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.08 , q= 4.16 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.45010 mri =0.000 curv = 1.422 unmri = -7.138 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.42 , q= 2.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.42 , q= 2.84 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.30950 mri =0.000 curv = 1.212 unmri = -7.159 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.21 , q= 2.42 ) 108 patches have been generated - 52 self-intersected max face = 332(452) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [51,143] BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.52017 mri =0.000 curv = 1.993 unmri = -8.494 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.99 , q= 3.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.99 , q= 3.99 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.85505 mri =0.000 curv = 1.283 unmri = -5.988 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.28 , q= 2.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.28 , q= 2.57 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 6.44399 mri =0.000 curv = 2.761 unmri = -17.490 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.76 , q= 5.52 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.76 , q= 5.52 ) 114 patches have been generated - 63 self-intersected max face = 332(512) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [51,143] BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.17705 mri =0.000 curv = 3.324 unmri = -20.472 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.32 , q= 6.65 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.23198 mri =0.000 curv = 3.310 unmri = -20.473 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.31 , q= 6.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 17.59802 mri =0.000 curv = 2.899 unmri = -29.195 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.80 ) 112 patches have been generated - 59 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 17.59802 # generated patches : 438 (218 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -288 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-288 (nv=238548, nf=477672, ne=716508) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 111 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 111: 106 vertices location: [ (133,54,130) - average intensity = 95.845 ] -gray ( 90.23 , 3.42 ) -white ( 101.40 , 3.39 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (90.232704 [log = -2.145360 ]- 101.402977 [log = -2.139146 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 182(182) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [28,83] BEST FITNESS (o)is -97.58730 mri =0.000 curv = 24.550 unmri = -0.613 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=24.55 , q= 49.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=24.55 , q= 49.10 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -47.35962 mri =0.000 curv = 1.383 unmri = 41.829 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.77 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -34.57822 mri =0.000 curv = 7.740 unmri = 3.617 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.74 , q= 15.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.74 , q= 15.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -29.20684 mri =0.000 curv = 6.121 unmri = 4.724 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.12 , q= 12.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.12 , q= 12.24 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.05387 mri =0.000 curv = 5.645 unmri = 5.474 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.65 , q= 11.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.65 , q= 11.29 ) 59 patches have been generated - 30 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -28.05387 # generated patches : 59 (30 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -286 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-286 (nv=238580, nf=477732, ne=716598) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 112 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 112: 304 vertices location: [ (152,125,132) - average intensity = 89.330 ] -gray ( 85.16 , 4.27 ) -white ( 93.27 , 7.56 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.163826 [log = -2.498801 ]- 93.269958 [log = -3.045083 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 561(561) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [85,234] BEST FITNESS (o)is -60.23293 mri =0.000 curv = 13.604 unmri = 5.817 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.60 , q= 27.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=13.60 , q= 27.21 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -28.35242 mri =0.000 curv = 3.910 unmri = 12.713 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.91 , q= 7.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.91 , q= 7.82 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.00601 mri =0.000 curv = 3.868 unmri = -1.467 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.87 , q= 7.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.87 , q= 7.74 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -2.39991 mri =0.000 curv = 4.650 unmri = -16.199 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.65 , q= 9.30 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.65 , q= 9.30 ) 191 patches have been generated - 95 self-intersected max face = 561(641) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [85,234] BEST FITNESS (o)is -38.85974 mri =0.000 curv = 12.311 unmri = -10.385 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.31 , q= 24.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=12.31 , q= 24.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.80468 mri =0.000 curv = 4.246 unmri = -5.180 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.25 , q= 8.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.25 , q= 8.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.80399 mri =0.000 curv = 4.246 unmri = -5.180 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.25 , q= 8.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.25 , q= 8.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.64238 mri =0.000 curv = 5.226 unmri = -10.262 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.23 , q= 10.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.23 , q= 10.45 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.29614 mri =0.000 curv = 6.108 unmri = -15.136 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.11 , q= 12.22 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.11 , q= 12.22 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.84568 mri =0.000 curv = 5.814 unmri = -19.412 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.81 , q= 11.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.81 , q= 11.63 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.91984 mri =0.000 curv = 4.809 unmri = -18.315 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.81 , q= 9.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.81 , q= 9.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.51244 mri =0.000 curv = 4.319 unmri = -17.790 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.32 , q= 8.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.32 , q= 8.64 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.80484 mri =0.000 curv = 4.215 unmri = -17.666 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.22 , q= 8.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.22 , q= 8.43 ) 171 patches have been generated - 58 self-intersected max face = 561(693) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [85,234] BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.06668 mri =0.000 curv = 4.428 unmri = -19.777 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.43 , q= 8.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.43 , q= 8.86 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.27746 mri =0.000 curv = 5.525 unmri = -25.378 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.53 , q= 11.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.53 , q= 11.05 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 5.32975 mri =0.000 curv = 4.962 unmri = -25.178 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.96 , q= 9.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.96 , q= 9.92 ) 180 patches have been generated - 61 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 5.32975 # generated patches : 542 (214 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -280 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-280 (nv=238674, nf=477908, ne=716862) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 113 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 113: 79 vertices location: [ (188,113,131) - average intensity = 97.033 ] -gray ( 87.73 , 8.75 ) -white ( 100.61 , 3.51 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.727875 [log = -4.209183 ]- 100.611107 [log = -2.247733 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 142(142) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [22,67] BEST FITNESS (o)is -131.33576 mri =0.000 curv = 31.251 unmri = 6.333 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=31.25 , q= 62.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=31.25 , q= 62.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -131.32569 mri =0.000 curv = 31.250 unmri = 6.327 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=31.25 , q= 62.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=31.25 , q= 62.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -116.37926 mri =0.000 curv = 30.356 unmri = -5.044 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.36 , q= 60.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.36 , q= 60.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -116.33183 mri =0.000 curv = 30.342 unmri = -5.038 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.34 , q= 60.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=30.34 , q= 60.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -111.25748 mri =0.000 curv = 29.065 unmri = -5.004 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=29.07 , q= 58.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=29.07 , q= 58.13 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -92.41312 mri =0.000 curv = 24.417 unmri = -5.255 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=24.42 , q= 48.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=24.42 , q= 48.83 ) 48 patches have been generated - 25 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -92.41312 # generated patches : 48 (25 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -278 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-278 (nv=238734, nf=478024, ne=717036) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 114 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 114!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -278 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-278 (nv=238734, nf=478024, ne=717036) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 115 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 115!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -278 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-278 (nv=238734, nf=478024, ne=717036) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 116 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 116: 55 vertices location: [ (183,139,130) - average intensity = 92.955 ] -gray ( 85.99 , 8.32 ) -white ( 97.85 , 4.17 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.988136 [log = -2.690877 ]- 97.853065 [log = -2.284686 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 87(87) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [14,45] BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.56205 mri =0.000 curv = 0.580 unmri = -0.759 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.58 , q= 1.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.58 , q= 1.16 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.55757 mri =0.000 curv = 0.579 unmri = -0.759 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.58 , q= 1.16 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.58 , q= 1.16 ) 28 patches have been generated - 5 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.55757 # generated patches : 28 (5 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -276 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-276 (nv=238756, nf=478064, ne=717096) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 117 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 117!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -276 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-276 (nv=238756, nf=478064, ne=717096) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 118 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 118!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -276 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-276 (nv=238756, nf=478064, ne=717096) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 119 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 119!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -276 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-276 (nv=238756, nf=478064, ne=717096) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 120 with euler number -13 (7 loops) computing statistics for defect 120: 1256 vertices location: [ (183,123,142) - average intensity = 94.586 ] -gray ( 85.62 , 11.10 ) -white ( 99.57 , 4.62 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.617157 [log = -3.417909 ]- 99.568481 [log = -2.514694 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 2347(2347) - loop = 1 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.58125 mri =0.000 curv = 2.142 unmri = -1.988 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.14 , q= 4.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.14 , q= 4.28 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.39388 mri =0.000 curv = 2.326 unmri = -12.699 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.33 , q= 4.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.33 , q= 4.65 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 4.57980 mri =0.000 curv = 4.038 unmri = -20.730 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.04 , q= 8.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.04 , q= 8.08 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 6.85714 mri =0.000 curv = 2.467 unmri = -16.725 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.47 , q= 4.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.47 , q= 4.93 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 8.59734 mri =0.000 curv = 2.156 unmri = -17.223 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.16 , q= 4.31 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 37.95851 mri =0.000 curv = 2.071 unmri = -46.243 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.07 , q= 4.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.07 , q= 4.14 ) 638 patches have been generated - 280 self-intersected max face = 2347(2451) - loop = 2 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is 39.73511 mri =0.000 curv = 2.124 unmri = -48.231 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.12 , q= 4.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.12 , q= 4.25 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 40.47796 mri =0.000 curv = 2.436 unmri = -50.221 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.87 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 43.10296 mri =0.000 curv = 5.722 unmri = -65.992 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.72 , q= 11.44 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.72 , q= 11.44 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 51.73483 mri =0.000 curv = 3.017 unmri = -63.802 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.03 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 53.05784 mri =0.000 curv = 2.424 unmri = -62.753 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.42 , q= 4.85 ) 640 patches have been generated - 330 self-intersected max face = 2347(2515) - loop = 3 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is 54.86725 mri =0.000 curv = 2.468 unmri = -64.740 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.47 , q= 4.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.47 , q= 4.94 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 55.69490 mri =0.000 curv = 3.116 unmri = -68.158 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.12 , q= 6.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.12 , q= 6.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 56.50637 mri =0.000 curv = 3.397 unmri = -70.093 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.40 , q= 6.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.40 , q= 6.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 63.60983 mri =0.000 curv = 2.780 unmri = -74.729 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.78 , q= 5.56 ) 644 patches have been generated - 322 self-intersected max face = 2347(2627) - loop = 4 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is 60.30577 mri =0.000 curv = 3.387 unmri = -73.854 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.77 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 61.78929 mri =0.000 curv = 3.104 unmri = -74.204 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.10 , q= 6.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.10 , q= 6.21 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 64.53918 mri =0.000 curv = 2.726 unmri = -75.443 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.73 , q= 5.45 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 72.29859 mri =0.000 curv = 2.905 unmri = -83.918 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.81 ) 648 patches have been generated - 339 self-intersected max face = 2347(2747) - loop = 5 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is 68.75560 mri =0.000 curv = 3.561 unmri = -83.000 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.56 , q= 7.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.56 , q= 7.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 70.38686 mri =0.000 curv = 2.897 unmri = -81.974 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.90 , q= 5.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 72.27721 mri =0.000 curv = 2.959 unmri = -84.112 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 74.68343 mri =0.000 curv = 3.171 unmri = -87.366 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.34 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 74.80353 mri =0.000 curv = 3.302 unmri = -88.010 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.30 , q= 6.60 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 77.42400 mri =0.000 curv = 3.368 unmri = -90.897 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.37 , q= 6.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.37 , q= 6.74 ) 618 patches have been generated - 324 self-intersected max face = 2347(2839) - loop = 6 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is 73.97773 mri =0.000 curv = 3.992 unmri = -89.944 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.99 , q= 7.98 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.99 , q= 7.98 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 75.22866 mri =0.000 curv = 3.393 unmri = -88.801 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.39 , q= 6.79 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 79.89037 mri =0.000 curv = 3.613 unmri = -94.344 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 80.17348 mri =0.000 curv = 3.622 unmri = -94.663 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.62 , q= 7.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.62 , q= 7.24 ) 625 patches have been generated - 328 self-intersected max face = 2347(2899) - loop = 7 (7) - ntries = [285,949] BEST FITNESS (o)is 76.80151 mri =0.000 curv = 4.227 unmri = -93.710 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.23 , q= 8.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.23 , q= 8.45 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 78.14332 mri =0.000 curv = 3.986 unmri = -94.086 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.99 , q= 7.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.99 , q= 7.97 ) 685 patches have been generated - 432 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 78.14332 # generated patches : 4498 (2355 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -262 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-262 (nv=239070, nf=478664, ne=717996) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 121 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 121!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -262 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-262 (nv=239070, nf=478664, ne=717996) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 122 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 122: 106 vertices location: [ (179,140,133) - average intensity = 96.123 ] -gray ( 85.51 , 17.09 ) -white ( 96.26 , 19.13 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.512733 [log = -2.717359 ]- 96.255478 [log = -3.006731 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 178(178) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [28,81] BEST FITNESS (o)is -25.66911 mri =0.000 curv = 3.360 unmri = 12.227 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.36 , q= 6.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.36 , q= 6.72 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 44.04649 mri =0.000 curv = 0.561 unmri = -46.291 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.56 , q= 1.12 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 60.53598 mri =0.000 curv = 1.294 unmri = -65.713 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.29 , q= 2.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.29 , q= 2.59 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 61.69724 mri =0.000 curv = 0.949 unmri = -65.495 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.95 , q= 1.90 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.95 , q= 1.90 ) 57 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 61.69724 # generated patches : 57 (24 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -260 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-260 (nv=239120, nf=478760, ne=718140) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 123 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 123: 55 vertices location: [ (189,136,132) - average intensity = 90.964 ] -gray ( 79.78 , 24.25 ) -white ( 90.08 , 26.40 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (79.779991 [log = -4.664655 ]- 90.078941 [log = -4.998971 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 92(92) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,47] BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.33646 mri =0.000 curv = 1.317 unmri = -5.605 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.32 , q= 2.63 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.60728 mri =0.000 curv = 1.251 unmri = -5.611 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.25 , q= 2.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.68772 mri =0.000 curv = 1.228 unmri = -5.601 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.23 , q= 2.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.23 , q= 2.46 ) 32 patches have been generated - 17 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 0.68772 # generated patches : 32 (17 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -258 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-258 (nv=239142, nf=478800, ne=718200) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 124 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 124!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -258 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-258 (nv=239142, nf=478800, ne=718200) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 125 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 125!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -258 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-258 (nv=239142, nf=478800, ne=718200) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 126 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 126!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -258 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-258 (nv=239142, nf=478800, ne=718200) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 127 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 127: 205 vertices location: [ (161,146,136) - average intensity = 93.570 ] -gray ( 87.65 , 5.51 ) -white ( 99.55 , 4.80 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.651169 [log = -2.487769 ]- 99.551956 [log = -2.547439 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 381(381) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [58,162] BEST FITNESS (o)is -66.48193 mri =0.000 curv = 16.642 unmri = -0.084 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.64 , q= 33.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.64 , q= 33.28 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -36.10370 mri =0.000 curv = 1.456 unmri = 30.280 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.46 , q= 2.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.46 , q= 2.91 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -24.24370 mri =0.000 curv = 1.560 unmri = 18.005 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.56 , q= 3.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.56 , q= 3.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -23.54664 mri =0.000 curv = 6.090 unmri = -0.813 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.09 , q= 12.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.09 , q= 12.18 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.76339 mri =0.000 curv = 2.004 unmri = 8.748 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.00 , q= 4.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.62246 mri =0.000 curv = 3.140 unmri = -0.937 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.28 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.17888 mri =0.000 curv = 2.137 unmri = -1.370 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.14 , q= 4.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.14 , q= 4.27 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.12134 mri =0.000 curv = 2.135 unmri = -1.418 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.27 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -4.85604 mri =0.000 curv = 4.001 unmri = -11.148 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.00 , q= 8.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.00 , q= 8.00 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -1.42093 mri =0.000 curv = 2.430 unmri = -8.300 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.43 , q= 4.86 ) 125 patches have been generated - 52 self-intersected max face = 381(517) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [58,162] BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.41992 mri =0.000 curv = 2.907 unmri = -11.207 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.91 , q= 5.81 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.91 , q= 5.81 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.32355 mri =0.000 curv = 2.958 unmri = -15.156 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.96 , q= 5.92 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 3.42379 mri =0.000 curv = 2.796 unmri = -14.606 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.59 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.80 , q= 5.59 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 4.41039 mri =0.000 curv = 2.985 unmri = -16.349 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.98 , q= 5.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.98 , q= 5.97 ) 129 patches have been generated - 58 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 4.41039 # generated patches : 254 (110 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -254 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-254 (nv=239272, nf=479052, ne=718578) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 128 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 128: 259 vertices location: [ (154,117,138) - average intensity = 92.958 ] -gray ( 90.98 , 4.00 ) -white ( 100.07 , 3.43 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (90.975159 [log = -2.132619 ]- 100.069756 [log = -2.147025 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 485(485) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [74,204] BEST FITNESS (o)is -71.19848 mri =0.000 curv = 17.371 unmri = 1.713 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.37 , q= 34.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=17.37 , q= 34.74 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -68.44729 mri =0.000 curv = 15.732 unmri = 5.518 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=15.73 , q= 31.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=15.73 , q= 31.46 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -48.69049 mri =0.000 curv = 11.787 unmri = 1.544 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.79 , q= 23.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.79 , q= 23.57 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -43.81745 mri =0.000 curv = 10.505 unmri = 1.796 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.51 , q= 21.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=10.51 , q= 21.01 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -40.03588 mri =0.000 curv = 11.566 unmri = -6.228 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.57 , q= 23.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.57 , q= 23.13 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.34111 mri =0.000 curv = 8.002 unmri = 1.335 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.00 , q= 16.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.00 , q= 16.00 ) 152 patches have been generated - 56 self-intersected max face = 485(701) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [74,204] BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.23107 mri =0.000 curv = 7.495 unmri = 3.251 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.49 , q= 14.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.49 , q= 14.99 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -33.22681 mri =0.000 curv = 7.493 unmri = 3.254 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.49 , q= 14.99 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.49 , q= 14.99 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -32.18571 mri =0.000 curv = 7.352 unmri = 2.778 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.35 , q= 14.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.35 , q= 14.70 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -28.34438 mri =0.000 curv = 8.336 unmri = -5.001 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.34 , q= 16.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.34 , q= 16.67 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -27.25473 mri =0.000 curv = 8.089 unmri = -5.101 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.09 , q= 16.18 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.09 , q= 16.18 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -18.19929 mri =0.000 curv = 8.891 unmri = -17.366 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.89 , q= 17.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.89 , q= 17.78 ) 149 patches have been generated - 52 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -18.19929 # generated patches : 301 (108 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -250 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-250 (nv=239414, nf=479328, ne=718992) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 129 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 129: 302 vertices location: [ (185,136,139) - average intensity = 90.308 ] -gray ( 86.92 , 9.52 ) -white ( 99.22 , 4.19 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (86.920593 [log = -2.456273 ]- 99.217247 [log = -2.373753 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 561(561) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [85,234] BEST FITNESS (o)is -17.44501 mri =0.000 curv = 5.013 unmri = -2.607 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.01 , q= 10.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.01 , q= 10.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.53815 mri =0.000 curv = 2.439 unmri = -1.218 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.44 , q= 4.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -7.41185 mri =0.000 curv = 2.263 unmri = -1.639 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.26 , q= 4.53 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.26 , q= 4.53 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.02804 mri =0.000 curv = 3.026 unmri = -12.131 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.03 , q= 6.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 2.64399 mri =0.000 curv = 2.140 unmri = -11.203 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.14 , q= 4.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.14 , q= 4.28 ) 182 patches have been generated - 93 self-intersected max face = 561(649) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [85,234] BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.03124 mri =0.000 curv = 2.127 unmri = -6.475 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.13 , q= 4.25 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.28292 mri =0.000 curv = 2.271 unmri = -18.369 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.27 , q= 4.54 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.27 , q= 4.54 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 10.04631 mri =0.000 curv = 2.517 unmri = -20.114 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.52 , q= 5.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.52 , q= 5.03 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 10.62425 mri =0.000 curv = 6.895 unmri = -38.204 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.89 , q= 13.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.89 , q= 13.79 ) 170 patches have been generated - 84 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 10.62425 # generated patches : 352 (177 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -246 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-246 (nv=239482, nf=479456, ne=719184) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 130 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 130: 68 vertices location: [ (140,42,137) - average intensity = 96.704 ] -gray ( 91.12 , 4.66 ) -white ( 99.62 , 3.30 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (91.123825 [log = -2.153439 ]- 99.623451 [log = -2.165264 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 114(114) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [18,56] BEST FITNESS (o)is -86.78946 mri =0.000 curv = 21.464 unmri = 0.933 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.46 , q= 42.93 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=21.46 , q= 42.93 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.41836 mri =0.000 curv = 2.028 unmri = 5.307 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.03 , q= 4.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.03 , q= 4.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.83265 mri =0.000 curv = 1.572 unmri = 5.544 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.57 , q= 3.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.57 , q= 3.14 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.49299 mri =0.000 curv = 0.984 unmri = 7.556 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.98 , q= 1.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.98 , q= 1.97 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.88630 mri =0.000 curv = 0.748 unmri = 7.895 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.75 , q= 1.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.75 , q= 1.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.76246 mri =0.000 curv = 0.752 unmri = 7.756 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.75 , q= 1.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.75 , q= 1.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -8.67720 mri =0.000 curv = 0.577 unmri = 6.370 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.58 , q= 1.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.58 , q= 1.15 ) 38 patches have been generated - 18 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -8.67720 # generated patches : 38 (18 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -244 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-244 (nv=239560, nf=479608, ne=719412) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 131 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 131: 48 vertices location: [ (173,103,136) - average intensity = 95.474 ] -gray ( 89.62 , 5.64 ) -white ( 99.67 , 4.58 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (89.616676 [log = -2.249725 ]- 99.667252 [log = -2.642345 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 79(79) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,42] BEST FITNESS (o)is -38.22345 mri =0.000 curv = 9.369 unmri = 0.748 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.37 , q= 18.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=9.37 , q= 18.74 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.95749 mri =0.000 curv = 1.256 unmri = 1.932 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.26 , q= 2.51 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.26 , q= 2.51 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.33793 mri =0.000 curv = 1.026 unmri = 2.234 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.24863 mri =0.000 curv = 1.074 unmri = 1.953 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.07 , q= 2.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.07 , q= 2.15 ) 28 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.24863 # generated patches : 28 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -242 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-242 (nv=239594, nf=479672, ne=719508) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 132 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 132: 119 vertices location: [ (158,136,138) - average intensity = 93.872 ] -gray ( 88.90 , 3.59 ) -white ( 101.65 , 3.55 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.900505 [log = -2.253503 ]- 101.651260 [log = -2.173605 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 210(210) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [33,94] BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.78353 mri =0.000 curv = 1.013 unmri = 0.733 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.01 , q= 2.03 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.01 , q= 2.03 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.60851 mri =0.000 curv = 1.183 unmri = -2.123 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.18 , q= 2.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.18 , q= 2.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.07765 mri =0.000 curv = 1.062 unmri = -2.170 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.06 , q= 2.12 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.06 , q= 2.12 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.87339 mri =0.000 curv = 1.033 unmri = -2.258 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.07 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.07 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.84797 mri =0.000 curv = 1.027 unmri = -2.259 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.03 , q= 2.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -1.58374 mri =0.000 curv = 0.926 unmri = -2.122 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.93 , q= 1.85 ) 67 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -1.58374 # generated patches : 67 (22 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -240 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-240 (nv=239634, nf=479748, ne=719622) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 133 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 133!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -240 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-240 (nv=239634, nf=479748, ne=719622) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 134 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 134!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -240 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-240 (nv=239634, nf=479748, ne=719622) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 135 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 135!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -240 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-240 (nv=239634, nf=479748, ne=719622) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 136 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 136!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -240 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-240 (nv=239634, nf=479748, ne=719622) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 137 with euler number -5 (3 loops) computing statistics for defect 137: 159 vertices location: [ (182,78,139) - average intensity = 95.460 ] -gray ( 85.66 , 8.71 ) -white ( 99.01 , 3.26 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (85.656761 [log = -4.544944 ]- 99.011681 [log = -2.121827 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 292(292) - loop = 1 (3) - ntries = [45,127] BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.23816 mri =0.000 curv = 5.241 unmri = -5.725 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.24 , q= 10.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.24 , q= 10.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.85017 mri =0.000 curv = 5.183 unmri = -5.882 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.18 , q= 10.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.18 , q= 10.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.34481 mri =0.000 curv = 4.947 unmri = -5.441 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.95 , q= 9.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.95 , q= 9.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.35967 mri =0.000 curv = 4.461 unmri = -4.483 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.46 , q= 8.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.46 , q= 8.92 ) 91 patches have been generated - 41 self-intersected max face = 292(404) - loop = 2 (3) - ntries = [45,127] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.90425 mri =0.000 curv = 4.028 unmri = -10.209 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.03 , q= 8.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.03 , q= 8.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.90299 mri =0.000 curv = 4.028 unmri = -10.208 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.03 , q= 8.06 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.03 , q= 8.06 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.67205 mri =0.000 curv = 4.469 unmri = -13.203 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.47 , q= 8.94 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.47 , q= 8.94 ) 93 patches have been generated - 48 self-intersected max face = 292(468) - loop = 3 (3) - ntries = [45,127] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.76592 mri =0.000 curv = 8.068 unmri = -18.507 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.07 , q= 16.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=8.07 , q= 16.14 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -0.24520 mri =0.000 curv = 4.854 unmri = -19.170 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.85 , q= 9.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.85 , q= 9.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.77905 mri =0.000 curv = 4.421 unmri = -18.461 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.42 , q= 8.84 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.42 , q= 8.84 ) 90 patches have been generated - 45 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 0.77905 # generated patches : 274 (134 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -234 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-234 (nv=239760, nf=479988, ne=719982) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 138 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 138!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -234 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-234 (nv=239760, nf=479988, ne=719982) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 139 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 139!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -234 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-234 (nv=239760, nf=479988, ne=719982) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 140 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 140: 494 vertices location: [ (151,146,143) - average intensity = 89.040 ] -gray ( 84.26 , 18.71 ) -white ( 95.61 , 20.91 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (84.261185 [log = -3.285157 ]- 95.612144 [log = -3.118556 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 948(948) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [143,389] BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.83959 mri =0.000 curv = 1.854 unmri = 6.422 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.85 , q= 3.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.85 , q= 3.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 5.10912 mri =0.000 curv = 1.196 unmri = -9.894 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.20 , q= 2.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.20 , q= 2.39 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 27.11741 mri =0.000 curv = 1.983 unmri = -35.051 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.98 , q= 3.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.98 , q= 3.97 ) 295 patches have been generated - 106 self-intersected max face = 948(1020) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [143,389] BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.61253 mri =0.000 curv = 2.506 unmri = -28.637 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.51 , q= 5.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 22.77519 mri =0.000 curv = 1.915 unmri = -30.436 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.92 , q= 3.83 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.92 , q= 3.83 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 39.21530 mri =0.000 curv = 2.461 unmri = -49.058 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.92 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 68.03755 mri =0.000 curv = 2.455 unmri = -77.858 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.91 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.46 , q= 4.91 ) 304 patches have been generated - 127 self-intersected max face = 948(1136) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [143,389] BEST FITNESS (o)is 59.91977 mri =0.000 curv = 2.880 unmri = -71.439 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.88 , q= 5.76 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 63.73899 mri =0.000 curv = 2.376 unmri = -73.242 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.75 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 86.20078 mri =0.000 curv = 2.659 unmri = -96.836 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.66 , q= 5.32 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 88.71957 mri =0.000 curv = 2.840 unmri = -100.078 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.84 , q= 5.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.84 , q= 5.68 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 90.23671 mri =0.000 curv = 2.675 unmri = -100.938 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.68 , q= 5.35 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 91.41452 mri =0.000 curv = 2.938 unmri = -103.165 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) 297 patches have been generated - 128 self-intersected max face = 948(1224) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [143,389] BEST FITNESS (o)is 90.16188 mri =0.000 curv = 2.849 unmri = -101.558 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.85 , q= 5.70 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 100.20966 mri =0.000 curv = 3.615 unmri = -114.669 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.61 , q= 7.23 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 101.29806 mri =0.000 curv = 3.373 unmri = -114.788 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.37 , q= 6.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.37 , q= 6.75 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 101.48788 mri =0.000 curv = 3.363 unmri = -114.939 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.36 , q= 6.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.36 , q= 6.73 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 102.07079 mri =0.000 curv = 3.183 unmri = -114.803 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.18 , q= 6.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.18 , q= 6.37 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 102.25431 mri =0.000 curv = 3.167 unmri = -114.924 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.33 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 102.26962 mri =0.000 curv = 3.169 unmri = -114.945 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.34 ) 302 patches have been generated - 118 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 102.26962 # generated patches : 1198 (479 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -226 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-226 (nv=239926, nf=480304, ne=720456) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 141 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 141: 163 vertices location: [ (131,104,142) - average intensity = 92.768 ] -gray ( 81.95 , 16.04 ) -white ( 98.72 , 7.27 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (81.948105 [log = -4.090818 ]- 98.720032 [log = -2.559388 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 307(307) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [47,133] BEST FITNESS (o)is -110.72656 mri =0.000 curv = 28.356 unmri = -2.696 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=28.36 , q= 56.71 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=28.36 , q= 56.71 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -83.68851 mri =0.000 curv = 16.444 unmri = 17.913 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.44 , q= 32.89 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.44 , q= 32.89 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -83.61816 mri =0.000 curv = 16.436 unmri = 17.874 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.44 , q= 32.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=16.44 , q= 32.87 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -59.40568 mri =0.000 curv = 11.606 unmri = 12.980 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.61 , q= 23.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.61 , q= 23.21 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -36.83649 mri =0.000 curv = 7.462 unmri = 6.988 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.46 , q= 14.92 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=7.46 , q= 14.92 ) 99 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -36.83649 # generated patches : 99 (47 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -224 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-224 (nv=239964, nf=480376, ne=720564) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 142 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 142: 116 vertices location: [ (169,110,140) - average intensity = 91.425 ] -gray ( 91.14 , 2.97 ) -white ( 98.98 , 3.11 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (91.141479 [log = -1.992369 ]- 98.978889 [log = -2.044086 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 217(217) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [34,97] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.27714 mri =0.000 curv = 0.696 unmri = 11.492 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.70 , q= 1.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.70 , q= 1.39 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.05882 mri =0.000 curv = 1.845 unmri = -14.437 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.84 , q= 3.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.84 , q= 3.69 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 20.27189 mri =0.000 curv = 1.549 unmri = -26.469 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.55 , q= 3.10 ) 68 patches have been generated - 34 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 20.27189 # generated patches : 68 (34 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -222 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-222 (nv=240002, nf=480448, ne=720672) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 143 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 143!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -222 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-222 (nv=240002, nf=480448, ne=720672) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 144 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 144: 95 vertices location: [ (181,102,141) - average intensity = 93.666 ] -gray ( 87.81 , 13.67 ) -white ( 97.95 , 13.58 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (87.806190 [log = -3.445238 ]- 97.945534 [log = -2.312387 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 162(162) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is -148.49575 mri =0.000 curv = 36.685 unmri = 1.758 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=36.68 , q= 73.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=36.68 , q= 73.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -58.31801 mri =0.000 curv = 14.140 unmri = 1.758 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.14 , q= 28.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.14 , q= 28.28 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -16.74574 mri =0.000 curv = 2.711 unmri = 5.900 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.42 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.82841 mri =0.000 curv = 1.132 unmri = -0.698 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.26 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.13 , q= 2.26 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 11.45428 mri =0.000 curv = 0.881 unmri = -14.977 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.88 , q= 1.76 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.88 , q= 1.76 ) 51 patches have been generated - 16 self-intersected max face = 162(262) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [25,75] BEST FITNESS (o)is 12.49559 mri =0.000 curv = 0.789 unmri = -15.650 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.79 , q= 1.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.79 , q= 1.58 ) 50 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 12.49559 # generated patches : 101 (39 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -218 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-218 (nv=240076, nf=480588, ne=720882) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 145 with euler number -11 (6 loops) computing statistics for defect 145: 966 vertices location: [ (134,119,151) - average intensity = 96.454 ] -gray ( 82.26 , 14.41 ) -white ( 100.24 , 6.48 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (82.263458 [log = -4.058349 ]- 100.239380 [log = -2.902910 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 1828(1828) - loop = 1 (6) - ntries = [275,741] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.67978 mri =0.000 curv = 2.932 unmri = -2.049 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.86 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.86 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -3.79464 mri =0.000 curv = 2.927 unmri = -7.911 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.85 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.93 , q= 5.85 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 0.78742 mri =0.000 curv = 3.792 unmri = -15.954 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.79 , q= 7.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.79 , q= 7.58 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 2.47338 mri =0.000 curv = 3.280 unmri = -15.595 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.56 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.28 , q= 6.56 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 2.95547 mri =0.000 curv = 3.168 unmri = -15.628 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.34 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 4.48360 mri =0.000 curv = 3.056 unmri = -16.707 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.06 , q= 6.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.06 , q= 6.11 ) 567 patches have been generated - 244 self-intersected max face = 1828(1884) - loop = 2 (6) - ntries = [275,741] BEST FITNESS (o)is 6.85960 mri =0.000 curv = 2.975 unmri = -18.759 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.97 , q= 5.95 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.97 , q= 5.95 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 14.79888 mri =0.000 curv = 2.940 unmri = -26.559 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 14.79888 mri =0.000 curv = 2.940 unmri = -26.559 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.88 ) 589 patches have been generated - 305 self-intersected max face = 1828(1940) - loop = 3 (6) - ntries = [275,741] BEST FITNESS (o)is 17.15234 mri =0.000 curv = 2.865 unmri = -28.612 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.86 , q= 5.73 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.86 , q= 5.73 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.75915 mri =0.000 curv = 2.986 unmri = -30.704 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.97 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.99 , q= 5.97 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.84969 mri =0.000 curv = 3.072 unmri = -31.136 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.14 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.14 ) 582 patches have been generated - 295 self-intersected max face = 1828(2008) - loop = 4 (6) - ntries = [275,741] BEST FITNESS (o)is 20.82606 mri =0.000 curv = 3.006 unmri = -32.851 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.01 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.01 , q= 6.01 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.19481 mri =0.000 curv = 3.021 unmri = -33.277 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.04 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 22.59966 mri =0.000 curv = 3.344 unmri = -35.975 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.34 , q= 6.69 ) 628 patches have been generated - 341 self-intersected max face = 1828(2068) - loop = 5 (6) - ntries = [275,741] BEST FITNESS (o)is 19.63446 mri =0.000 curv = 3.409 unmri = -33.272 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.41 , q= 6.82 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.41 , q= 6.82 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 20.47630 mri =0.000 curv = 3.206 unmri = -33.298 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.41 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 20.69874 mri =0.000 curv = 3.201 unmri = -33.504 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.20 , q= 6.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.20 , q= 6.40 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 22.97028 mri =0.000 curv = 3.174 unmri = -35.668 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.35 ) 657 patches have been generated - 412 self-intersected max face = 1828(2292) - loop = 6 (6) - ntries = [275,741] BEST FITNESS (o)is -136.52794 mri =0.000 curv = 3.188 unmri = 123.775 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.19 , q= 6.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.19 , q= 6.38 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -125.54936 mri =0.000 curv = 3.144 unmri = 112.971 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.29 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -81.86419 mri =0.000 curv = 3.043 unmri = 69.693 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.04 , q= 6.09 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.04 , q= 6.09 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -49.08954 mri =0.000 curv = 4.553 unmri = 30.876 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.55 , q= 9.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.55 , q= 9.11 ) 694 patches have been generated - 487 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -49.08954 # generated patches : 3717 (2084 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -206 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-206 (nv=240448, nf=481308, ne=721962) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 146 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 146: 81 vertices location: [ (150,112,141) - average intensity = 94.731 ] -gray ( 84.29 , 23.24 ) -white ( 93.68 , 25.58 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (84.285561 [log = -3.561144 ]- 93.680992 [log = -4.223914 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 145(145) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [23,68] BEST FITNESS (o)is -20.84232 mri =0.000 curv = 1.345 unmri = 15.462 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.35 , q= 2.69 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.35 , q= 2.69 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.40642 mri =0.000 curv = 1.376 unmri = -14.909 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.75 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.50775 mri =0.000 curv = 1.376 unmri = -15.010 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.75 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.38 , q= 2.75 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 9.54069 mri =0.000 curv = 1.188 unmri = -14.293 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.19 , q= 2.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.19 , q= 2.38 ) 46 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected max face = 145(201) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [23,68] BEST FITNESS (o)is -81.42978 mri =0.000 curv = 26.999 unmri = -26.567 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=27.00 , q= 54.00 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=27.00 , q= 54.00 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 8.43734 mri =0.000 curv = 5.899 unmri = -32.032 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.90 , q= 11.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.90 , q= 11.80 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.25898 mri =0.000 curv = 2.700 unmri = -29.058 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.40 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 18.73783 mri =0.000 curv = 2.383 unmri = -28.269 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.77 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.38 , q= 4.77 ) 46 patches have been generated - 23 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 18.73783 # generated patches : 92 (45 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -202 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-202 (nv=240522, nf=481448, ne=722172) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 147 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 147: 55 vertices location: [ (161,121,140) - average intensity = 95.458 ] -gray ( 91.01 , 3.81 ) -white ( 99.23 , 3.06 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (91.008888 [log = -2.192854 ]- 99.230179 [log = -2.044888 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 91(91) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [15,46] BEST FITNESS (o)is -11.84561 mri =0.000 curv = 3.176 unmri = -0.857 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.18 , q= 6.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.18 , q= 6.35 ) 31 patches have been generated - 13 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -11.84561 # generated patches : 31 (13 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -200 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-200 (nv=240544, nf=481488, ne=722232) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 148 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 148!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -200 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-200 (nv=240544, nf=481488, ne=722232) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 149 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 149!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -200 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-200 (nv=240544, nf=481488, ne=722232) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 150 with euler number -7 (4 loops) computing statistics for defect 150: 160 vertices location: [ (154,55,144) - average intensity = 94.520 ] -gray ( 90.55 , 3.16 ) -white ( 101.31 , 3.17 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (90.550720 [log = -1.972313 ]- 101.306244 [log = -2.113563 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 298(298) - loop = 1 (4) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -12.10568 mri =0.000 curv = 3.242 unmri = -0.863 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.24 , q= 6.48 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.24 , q= 6.48 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.33205 mri =0.000 curv = 1.202 unmri = 5.526 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.20 , q= 2.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.20 , q= 2.40 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -4.62114 mri =0.000 curv = 2.055 unmri = -3.598 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.05 , q= 4.11 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.05 , q= 4.11 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.85775 mri =0.000 curv = 2.576 unmri = -7.448 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.58 , q= 5.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.58 , q= 5.15 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -2.18115 mri =0.000 curv = 1.826 unmri = -5.122 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) 95 patches have been generated - 38 self-intersected max face = 298(346) - loop = 2 (4) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.95974 mri =0.000 curv = 1.360 unmri = 4.518 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.36 , q= 2.72 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.36 , q= 2.72 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.10918 mri =0.000 curv = 3.023 unmri = -5.984 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.05 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.02 , q= 6.05 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.15169 mri =0.000 curv = 1.687 unmri = -2.597 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.37 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is -2.30981 mri =0.000 curv = 3.138 unmri = -10.241 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.28 ) 97 patches have been generated - 47 self-intersected max face = 298(386) - loop = 3 (4) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -5.41301 mri =0.000 curv = 4.154 unmri = -11.203 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.15 , q= 8.31 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.15 , q= 8.31 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.88334 mri =0.000 curv = 4.022 unmri = -11.205 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.02 , q= 8.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=4.02 , q= 8.04 ) 99 patches have been generated - 52 self-intersected max face = 298(426) - loop = 4 (4) - ntries = [46,129] BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.25759 mri =0.000 curv = 5.789 unmri = -8.900 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.79 , q= 11.58 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.79 , q= 11.58 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.69101 mri =0.000 curv = 6.051 unmri = -10.512 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.05 , q= 12.10 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.05 , q= 12.10 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.42873 mri =0.000 curv = 5.247 unmri = -11.560 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.25 , q= 10.49 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.25 , q= 10.49 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -6.04430 mri =0.000 curv = 5.201 unmri = -14.760 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.20 , q= 10.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=5.20 , q= 10.40 ) 102 patches have been generated - 53 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -6.04430 # generated patches : 393 (190 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -192 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-192 (nv=240720, nf=481824, ne=722736) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 151 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 151: 65 vertices location: [ (174,106,143) - average intensity = 95.417 ] -gray ( 92.53 , 2.88 ) -white ( 103.09 , 3.77 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (92.527214 [log = -1.985531 ]- 103.090347 [log = -2.331019 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 117(117) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [19,57] BEST FITNESS (o)is -55.65808 mri =0.000 curv = 14.340 unmri = -1.703 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.34 , q= 28.68 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=14.34 , q= 28.68 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.53684 mri =0.000 curv = 1.620 unmri = 8.058 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.24 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.62 , q= 3.24 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -13.13826 mri =0.000 curv = 1.692 unmri = 6.370 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.38 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.05901 mri =0.000 curv = 1.520 unmri = 3.979 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.52 , q= 3.04 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -9.23061 mri =0.000 curv = 2.937 unmri = -2.519 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.87 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.94 , q= 5.87 ) 40 patches have been generated - 21 self-intersected max face = 117(169) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [19,57] BEST FITNESS (o)is -42.52219 mri =0.000 curv = 11.672 unmri = -4.164 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.67 , q= 23.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=11.67 , q= 23.34 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -15.50381 mri =0.000 curv = 2.773 unmri = 4.412 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.77 , q= 5.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -14.62653 mri =0.000 curv = 3.687 unmri = -0.123 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.69 , q= 7.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.69 , q= 7.37 ) 38 patches have been generated - 19 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : -14.62653 # generated patches : 78 (40 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -188 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-188 (nv=240788, nf=481952, ne=722928) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 152 with euler number -1 (1 loops) computing statistics for defect 152: 51 vertices location: [ (167,55,144) - average intensity = 94.622 ] -gray ( 88.59 , 6.02 ) -white ( 98.09 , 3.23 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.592834 [log = -2.590297 ]- 98.093277 [log = -2.043873 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 79(79) - loop = 1 (1) - ntries = [13,42] BEST FITNESS (o)is -30.16123 mri =0.000 curv = 6.775 unmri = 3.060 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.78 , q= 13.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=6.78 , q= 13.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -2.68702 mri =0.000 curv = 1.104 unmri = -1.729 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.10 , q= 2.21 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 1.87886 mri =0.000 curv = 0.298 unmri = -3.071 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.30 , q= 0.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=0.30 , q= 0.60 ) 26 patches have been generated - 10 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 1.87886 # generated patches : 26 (10 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -186 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-186 (nv=240816, nf=482004, ne=723006) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 153 with euler number -3 (2 loops) computing statistics for defect 153: 83 vertices location: [ (171,58,145) - average intensity = 93.537 ] -gray ( 80.57 , 22.32 ) -white ( 90.86 , 24.28 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (80.571922 [log = -3.418318 ]- 90.863625 [log = -4.470348 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 141(141) - loop = 1 (2) - ntries = [22,66] BEST FITNESS (o)is 6.20589 mri =0.000 curv = 1.107 unmri = -10.635 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.21 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.11 , q= 2.21 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 7.96249 mri =0.000 curv = 1.138 unmri = -12.513 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.28 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.14 , q= 2.28 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 20.70325 mri =0.000 curv = 1.601 unmri = -27.106 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.60 , q= 3.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.60 , q= 3.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.74055 mri =0.000 curv = 1.440 unmri = -27.502 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.44 , q= 2.88 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.44 , q= 2.88 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 21.80574 mri =0.000 curv = 1.691 unmri = -28.568 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.38 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.69 , q= 3.38 ) 47 patches have been generated - 24 self-intersected max face = 141(197) - loop = 2 (2) - ntries = [22,66] BEST FITNESS (o)is 31.84496 mri =0.000 curv = 1.835 unmri = -39.185 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.67 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 31.89885 mri =0.000 curv = 1.826 unmri = -39.201 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.83 , q= 3.65 ) 44 patches have been generated - 22 self-intersected INITIAL FITNESS : 0.00000 FINAL FITNESS : 31.89885 # generated patches : 91 (46 self-intersecting) AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -182 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-182 (nv=240868, nf=482100, ne=723150) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 154 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 154!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -182 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-182 (nv=240868, nf=482100, ne=723150) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 155 with euler number 1 (0 loops) Nothing to correct for defect 155!! AFTER CORRECTION, EULER IS -182 Surface Diagnostics: eno=-182 (nv=240868, nf=482100, ne=723150) # of border vertices [ #v ~ #f ] 0 # of edges with single face 0 # of edges with more than 2 faces 0 # of corner configurations 0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Correcting Topology of defect 156 with euler number -21 (11 loops) computing statistics for defect 156: 1704 vertices location: [ (161,135,158) - average intensity = 91.251 ] -gray ( 88.30 , 5.03 ) -white ( 100.76 , 3.76 ) -gray ( 87.98 , 16.92 ) -white ( 101.27 , 14.29 ) -intensity (88.299187 [log = -2.238688 ]- 100.758156 [log = -2.243073 ]) -curv (k1=-0.125 (0.674) , r1 = 8.015 | k2=-0.058 (0.167), r2 = 17.225 ) -curv (k1=-0.088 (0.708) , r1 = 11.320 | k2=-0.031 (0.242), r2 = 32.096 ) max face = 3287(3287) - loop = 1 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is -10.42497 mri =0.000 curv = 1.300 unmri = 5.223 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.60 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.30 , q= 2.60 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is -4.53566 mri =0.000 curv = 3.584 unmri = -9.801 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.58 , q= 7.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.58 , q= 7.17 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 0.90651 mri =0.000 curv = 2.038 unmri = -9.059 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.04 , q= 4.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.04 , q= 4.08 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 14.70978 mri =0.000 curv = 1.170 unmri = -19.389 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.17 , q= 2.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.17 , q= 2.34 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 41.93899 mri =0.000 curv = 2.634 unmri = -52.474 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.63 , q= 5.27 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.63 , q= 5.27 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 50.18789 mri =0.000 curv = 2.600 unmri = -60.589 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.60 , q= 5.20 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.60 , q= 5.20 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 52.19770 mri =0.000 curv = 1.161 unmri = -56.840 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.16 , q= 2.32 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.16 , q= 2.32 ) 380 patches have been generated - 165 self-intersected max face = 3287(3523) - loop = 2 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 46.36521 mri =0.000 curv = 1.313 unmri = -51.617 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.31 , q= 2.63 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.31 , q= 2.63 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 72.08269 mri =0.000 curv = 1.391 unmri = -77.648 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.39 , q= 2.78 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.39 , q= 2.78 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 95.78271 mri =0.000 curv = 1.172 unmri = -100.471 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.17 , q= 2.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.17 , q= 2.34 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 96.30211 mri =0.000 curv = 2.287 unmri = -105.448 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.29 , q= 4.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.29 , q= 4.57 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 100.47852 mri =0.000 curv = 1.400 unmri = -106.077 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.40 , q= 2.80 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.40 , q= 2.80 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 168.40768 mri =0.000 curv = 1.585 unmri = -174.746 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.58 , q= 3.17 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.58 , q= 3.17 ) 386 patches have been generated - 172 self-intersected max face = 3287(3639) - loop = 3 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 162.61756 mri =0.000 curv = 1.726 unmri = -169.523 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.73 , q= 3.45 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.73 , q= 3.45 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 176.23348 mri =0.000 curv = 1.775 unmri = -183.333 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.77 , q= 3.55 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.77 , q= 3.55 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 185.85694 mri =0.000 curv = 1.672 unmri = -192.546 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.67 , q= 3.34 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=1.67 , q= 3.34 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 207.00598 mri =0.000 curv = 2.626 unmri = -217.509 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.63 , q= 5.25 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.63 , q= 5.25 ) 373 patches have been generated - 162 self-intersected max face = 3287(3707) - loop = 4 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 201.27884 mri =0.000 curv = 2.752 unmri = -212.286 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.75 , q= 5.50 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.75 , q= 5.50 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 210.08488 mri =0.000 curv = 2.870 unmri = -221.566 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.87 , q= 5.74 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.87 , q= 5.74 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 217.03791 mri =0.000 curv = 2.717 unmri = -227.905 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.72 , q= 5.43 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.72 , q= 5.43 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 247.07856 mri =0.000 curv = 2.665 unmri = -257.740 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.33 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 247.36610 mri =0.000 curv = 2.699 unmri = -258.162 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.70 , q= 5.40 ) 407 patches have been generated - 215 self-intersected max face = 3287(3819) - loop = 5 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 241.65837 mri =0.000 curv = 2.820 unmri = -252.938 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.82 , q= 5.64 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.82 , q= 5.64 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 250.74413 mri =0.000 curv = 2.643 unmri = -261.315 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.64 , q= 5.29 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 254.25665 mri =0.000 curv = 3.786 unmri = -269.401 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.79 , q= 7.57 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.79 , q= 7.57 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 256.90237 mri =0.000 curv = 2.667 unmri = -267.571 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.33 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.67 , q= 5.33 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 257.31227 mri =0.000 curv = 2.687 unmri = -268.062 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.37 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.37 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 259.38989 mri =0.000 curv = 2.693 unmri = -270.160 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.39 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.69 , q= 5.39 ) 396 patches have been generated - 170 self-intersected max face = 3287(3967) - loop = 6 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 253.70111 mri =0.000 curv = 2.809 unmri = -264.937 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.81 , q= 5.62 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.81 , q= 5.62 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 260.79407 mri =0.000 curv = 2.706 unmri = -271.617 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.41 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=2.71 , q= 5.41 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 270.40841 mri =0.000 curv = 3.065 unmri = -282.669 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.13 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.13 ) 396 patches have been generated - 176 self-intersected max face = 3287(4055) - loop = 7 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 264.74731 mri =0.000 curv = 3.175 unmri = -277.446 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.35 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.17 , q= 6.35 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 271.83358 mri =0.000 curv = 3.073 unmri = -284.127 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.07 , q= 6.15 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 275.43565 mri =0.000 curv = 3.573 unmri = -289.729 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.57 , q= 7.15 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.57 , q= 7.15 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 279.92491 mri =0.000 curv = 3.042 unmri = -292.091 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.04 , q= 6.08 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.04 , q= 6.08 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 280.44346 mri =0.000 curv = 3.228 unmri = -293.355 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.23 , q= 6.46 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.23 , q= 6.46 ) 404 patches have been generated - 181 self-intersected max face = 3287(4143) - loop = 8 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] BEST FITNESS (o)is 274.79954 mri =0.000 curv = 3.333 unmri = -288.132 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.67 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.33 , q= 6.67 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 278.58230 mri =0.000 curv = 3.896 unmri = -294.168 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.90 , q= 7.79 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.90 , q= 7.79 ) BEST FITNESS (o)is 283.87308 mri =0.000 curv = 3.143 unmri = -296.446 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.29 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.14 , q= 6.29 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 289.96685 mri =0.000 curv = 3.202 unmri = -302.777 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.20 , q= 6.40 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.20 , q= 6.40 ) BEST FITNESS (M) is 290.41524 mri =0.000 curv = 3.210 unmri = -303.255 ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.42 ) ( f=0.00 , v=0.00 , c=3.21 , q= 6.42 ) 425 patches have been generated - 219 self-intersected max face = 3287(4195) - loop = 9 (11) - ntries = [181,1325] ERROR: _FindFacePath: could not find path! Linux clare-OptiPlex-990 2.6.35-31-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 28 19:29:10 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux recon-all -s subject_1010 exited with ERRORS at Wed Jan 11 21:18:48 GMT 2012 To report a problem, see http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting