I think it will be threads.

On 11/19/2020 10:21 PM, d m wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution        

Thanks.

Just to confirm, the openmp reflects threads and not cores? In other words, on we have a 4 core machine with hyperthreading, so with 4 cores we have 8 threads available.

In that scenario, would the -openmp 4 option reflect 4 cores/8 threads or just 4 threads.

Thanks again.

d.m.
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <DGREVE@mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 6:09 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] -openmp vs -threads, -parallel options in recon-all
 
They are exactly the same. The two flags go to the same code.
From: freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of d m <fmrilog@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 5:59 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] -openmp vs -threads, -parallel options in recon-all
 

        External Email - Use Caution        

Hello,

What is the difference between the -openmp and -threads option for recon-all?

Do they reflect the same thing: Number of threads used concurrently?

If we want to use 10 threads for the recon-all command, which option should we use? -openmp or -threads? How does this relate to the -parallel option?

Does every part of recon-all use multi-threading or only does only a subset of parts within recon-all use multi-threading?

Thanks in advance.

d.m.

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-->