They’re different modules with different algorithms, which give different yet very highly correlated results. So, whatever you use the volumes for further down the stream, the results should be very similar with either version.
Cheers,
/Eugenio
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
From: <freesurfer-bounces@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of "Al Qadi, Ameen" <ameen.alqadi@icahn.mssm.edu>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Monday, September 7, 2020 at 14:37
To: "Fischl, Bruce" <BFISCHL@mgh.harvard.edu>, Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Fwd: Whole Thalamus Volume
External Email - Use Caution
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Al Qadi, Ameen <ameen.alqadi@icahn.mssm.edu>
Date: Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:09 PM
Subject: Whole Thalamus Volume
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Dear Freesurfer Developers,
I noticed a significant disparity in the left and right whole thalamus volumes between
aseg.stats generated from recon-all and ThalamicNuclei.v12.T1.volumes.txt
generated from the thalamic nuclei segmentation. Which set of volumes is the correct one to use?
Best,
Ameen
--
Ameen Al Qadi
MSBS Candidate
Icahn School Of Medicine at Mount Sinai '20
+1-646-500-1521
--
Ameen Al Qadi
MSBS Candidate
Icahn School Of Medicine at Mount Sinai '20
+1-646-500-1521