Wow! That was fast.
I am running FreeSurfer 5.3 on top of CentOS6 (64-bit). My hardware is a PC powered by Intel® Core™ i5 CPU M 520 @ 2.40GHz × 4
Thank you for all help.
Cheers
Marcos.
Em Ter, 2013-10-08 às 09:00 -0400, Bruce Fischl escreveu:
Hi Marcos

I've fixed this problem, which is a bug in one of the open source math 
libraries we use. If you email us the details of your hardware/software 
environment we'll get you a patch.

cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Marcos Martins da 
Silva wrote:

> Hi, Bruce
> I proceeded as explained at http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange .
> Using ftp method, it started at good rate but after I transferred about 3/4 of the file the transfer rate decreased to some bytes (not Kbytes) per
> second. Tried using curl -T and it seemed to complete after about 50 min but I got this message on terminal:
> DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
> <html><head>
> <title>405 Method Not Allowed</title>
> </head><body>
> <h1>Method Not Allowed</h1>
> <p>The requested method PUT is not allowed for the URL /transfer/incoming.</p>
> <hr>
> <address>Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS) Server at surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Port 80</address>
> </body></html>
> 
> So I am not sure you received the file. You should find a suj46.zip corresponding to the complete folder from my subject 46. You will find the
> usual structure created by recon-all. At mri folder you will find all the usual volumes, the posterior* files generated by hippo-subfield
> processing and the files I created on my analysis. Please, could you check if you really received the file? If not, I will try again using plain
> ftp.
> Thank you again for your help.
> Marcos.
> Em Seg, 2013-10-07 às 09:21 -0400, Bruce Fischl escreveu:
> 
> hmmm, I guess you should upload the subject so that we can track it down
> On 
> Mon, 7 Oct 2013, Marcos Martins da Silva wrote:
> 
> > Hi, Bruce.
> > Thank you for your fast answer.
> > I used a script and It took less than 15 min to process all files from all subjects, except
> > the 3 files (surfaces) mris_smooth seems to enter a loop. When I tried to smooth
> > surfLeftHippobody I waited for more than 4 hours. Comparing to the total time I needed to
> > process all files I concluded something was wrong and esed control + C to interrupt the
> > process. I tested on 2 machines (mine is running CentOS 6 and the second is a Mac, both using
> > Freesurfer 5.3) and got the same result. Including they seem to stop at the same point. Do you
> > think it could need more time to finnish processing?
> > Alternatively, as I can use mris_smooth to process the whole left hippocampus (the problem
> > only appears when processing the body segment), I guess I could get a similar and perhaps
> > better result if I could make a label from each of the binary masks of the 3 segments (head,
> > body, tail), merge them in an annot file and finally load the whole surface and the annot file
> > so I get the 3 segments discriminated by color. I found on Freesurfer Wiki how to merge the
> > labels into an annot file but not how to make the labels from the binary masks.
> > Thank you for your attention.
> > 
> > 
> > 2013/10/4 Bruce Fischl <fischl@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >       how long have you waited?
> >
> >       On Fri, 4 Oct 2013, Marcos Martins da Silva wrote:
> > 
> >
> >             Hi, Freesurfers
> >             I am getting some interesting hippocampal surfaces with the following
> >             steps:
> >             1- recon-all -all -hippo-subfields
> >             2- mri-concat (only CA1, CA23, CA4DG and the tail complement volumes)
> >             3- a custom OCTAVE script to segment the concatenated volume from step
> >             2
> >             into Head, Body and Tail
> >             4- mri_binarize Head, Body and Tail volumes from step 3
> >             5- mri_tessellate the binary masks from step 4
> >             6- mri_smooth the surfaces from step 5
> >
> >             Using freeview I got a screenshot showing both hippocampi segmented
> >             (hipposurf3d.png is attached).
> >             This approach worked well for 16 subjects up to step 5. Step 6 was
> >             completed
> >             as well in 13 out 16 subjects.
> >
> >             The only problem was during left hippocampal body smoothing in 3
> >             subjects
> >             (all the other surfaces from all 16 subjects in were smoothed with no
> >             problem). For these 3 surfaces, mris_smooth simply freezes, with no
> >             error
> >             message. I must press control + C to quit the program. During the
> >             freezing I
> >             noticed high CPU use.
> >             It follows the exactly command I used and the screen output.
> >
> >             mris_smooth -nw -g 5 2 -a 1 -n 1 surfLeftHippoBody lh.surfHippoBody
> >             using Gaussian curvature smoothing with norm 5.00 with 2 smooth steps
> >             averaging curvature for 1 iterations
> >             smoothing for 1 iterations
> >             smoothing surface tessellation for 1 iterations...
> >             ------------------------------------------------------
> >             ------------------------------------------------------
> >             ------------------ pass 1 (num=2853) ------------------
> >             ------------------------------------------------------
> >             ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >             If I supress the gaussian parameters and run just something like:
> >             mris_smooth -nw -a 1 -n 1 surfLeftHippoBody lh.surfHippoBody
> >             or even
> >             mris_smooth -nw  surfLeftHippoBody lh.surfHippoBody
> >
> >             I got the smoothed surface with no errors but the final quality is not
> >             as
> >             good as when I use the gaussian parameters.
> >             I am attaching one of the problematic surface files so you can check
> >             it
> >             (surfLeftHippobody). Intersting if I use a surface with all left
> >             hippocampus
> >             (including head, problematic body and tail and) smoothing completes
> >             without
> >             error
> >             Thank you very much for any help.
> >             Marcos
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> > dispose of the e-mail.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> 
>