Is this something I can change in my dmrirc file or do I need to run flirt on it's own?

Thanks,

Kiely

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Priti Srinivasan <rspriti@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Kiely, For flirt, try using corratio, cost function instead of mutualinfo
(which is the default in trac-all) to see if that solves your registration
problem.


> Hi Kiely - Looks like you used flirt for the intra-subject registration,
> so you can look in trac-all.log for the flirt command line that registers
> diffusion to anatomical and play around with the parameters.
>
> You can also use bbregister instead of flirt for the intra-subject
> registration - it has the option to initialize with flirt or with SPM.
>
> Hope this helps,
> a.y
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2012, Kiely Donnelly wrote:
>
>> Hi Priti - Thanks for your help. The inter-subject registration seems to
>> have run OK, but there must be something wrong with the intra-subject
>> registration. When I try to view it using freeview, it's completely dark
>> - I
>> don't see a brain at all. Is there a way to troubleshoot this?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kiely 
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Priti Srinivasan
>> <rspriti@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>       Hi Kiely,
>>
>>       Have you checked your inter and intra subject registrations? The
>>       control
>>       points going off the dwi is not only for one paths but for all
>>       the paths.
>>       If the registration goes terribly wrong, this can happen. You
>>       can take a
>>       look at
>>
>>       /dmri/lowb_brain_anat.flt.nii.gz (For intra subject registration
>>       diff-anat)
>>
>>       and
>>
>>       /dmri/brain_anat_mni.nii.gz (For inter-subject registration
>>       anat-mni)
>>
>>       I would start by checking that first.
>>
>>       Priti
>>
>>       > Hello--
>>       >
>>       > I have run Tracula successfully for ~75 healthy subjects.
>>       However, the
>>       > pathway reconstruction seems to fail for a handful of people.
>>       I've
>>       > attached
>>       > the log file for one of these subjects. It appears that the
>>       control points
>>       > are not within the dwi. A similar problem occurred in a
>>       subject with
>>       > substantial signal loss in the dwi, but that doesn't seem to
>>       be the case
>>       > for this particular person. I have been creating the entire
>>       set of tracts,
>>       > but at this point, I'm only interested in the SLFt and SLFp.
>>       >
>>       > Thanks,
>>       >
>>       > Kiely
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Freesurfer mailing list
>> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
>> it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
>> and properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
>> Doctoral Candidate, Clinical Neuropsychology
>> University of Cincinnati
>>
>>_______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer




--
Kiely M. Donnelly, M.A.
Doctoral Candidate, Clinical Neuropsychology
University of Cincinnati