[Homer-users] HOMer version 3.1 official release
Ted Huppert
thuppert at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Wed Mar 17 17:09:36 EST 2004
AGHHHH! That's totally my fault. I had made the I and Q "fix" to HOMer
to preserve the imaginary component in the processing up until displaying
the data as suggested by Jon- Stupidly, I took the absolute value to
make it all real right before displaying. Its a
real easy fix that I post tonight (just fixed it on mine and it y'all look
in the code its obvious -in the HOMerFilt.m file under pushbutton_
update_callback - the last few lines or so- )
How can I find the magnitude of a complex number and preserve the sign? I
guess I can just say "real()" but that won't pick up the phase info (so I
might as well not had it as a complex number).
how about: sign(real(x))*abs(x) -or does that screw up the sign of the
phase correction???
BTW- that chnge was made in the code just last week- all older versions
are fine.
Sorry about that-
Ted
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Maria Angela Franceschini wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was trying the new version of homer, and there is an error (probably
> trivial). The DOD is calculated from an absolute value instead of been
> normalized to zero. I went back to homer version 2 (before Marge) and things
> are fine.
> mari
>
More information about the Homer-users
mailing list