[Mne_analysis] offline averaging: priority of delay and baseline in MNE 2.6

[Matti Hamalainen]

Hi Jeff,

On Nov 5, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jeff Hanna wrote:

> I can't seem to find anything about this in the manual or in the  
> archives.
> When using an .ave file for offline averaging, what is the priority  
> of the
> delay function in relation to the bmin bmax functions? When I  
> determine the
> borders of the baseline, are they in relation to the new zero point  
> set by
> the delay, or are they absolute to the trigger (i.e. not affected by
> delay)?

The delay comes first. You can think of the delay as virtually moving  
the trigger event to another sample.

- Matti




---------

Matti Hamalainen, Ph.D.
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Massachusetts General Hospital

msh at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20091105/2baf908f/attachment.html