[Mne_analysis] question regarding mne_do_forward_solution

[Andrew R. Dykstra]

Hi all,

Is there a reason for the following text regarding the --meas argument of
mne_do_forward_solution:

"It is recommended that the average file is employed for evoked-response
data and the original raw data file otherwise."

If all the measurement file contributes is the sensor location/orientation
info and the device-head transform, does it matter from which file - raw or
averaged - these data are pulled?  The quoted text from the manual would
suggest that a new forward solution be computed for each average file even
if they all derive from the same raw measurement, but that doesn't seem to
make sense.

Cheers,
Andy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20130128/9e2d4d2e/attachment.html