[Mne_analysis] mne report command

Gustavo Sudre gsudre at pobox.com
Fri Jul 11 20:59:25 EDT 2014
Search archives:

I second Alex and Dan's comments… great job Mainak! I'd certainly use the current version as is. But just to make it even better, on top of the previous comments, it might be nice to see a planar plot of the evoked (averaged) response…


On Jul 11, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Gramfort <alexandre.gramfort at telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:

> hi,
>> By default don't include events with value of 0 (maybe include it as
>> an option). In most cases these are not true events.
> the events are actually 1 not 0. This remark suggests me that we
> should not use standard y ticks/scaling for plot_events
>> The covariance matrix scaling for gradiometers in the sample file seems flat.
> I this it's correct. It's empty room with SSP applied.
>> At least an option to force a scaling factor for each file type
>> (because it can be confusing for example that the left and right
>> visual evoked examples have different scalings for the gradiometers).
>> It would be most helpful to split the Trans plot into multiple plots.
>> One with just the outer_skin (opaque) and array (transparent) (I would
>> prefer a sagittal view perhaps a view from the front is helpful too).
>> Another one to five plots (multiple angles) of the outer skin
>> (transparent) with the digitized points (scaled to indicate distance
>> from the surface).
> we can indeed do better. Maybe you can take a look at the plot_trans
> function and improve it a bit?
>> Paring down the amount of information shown in the Raw examples would
>> be helpful.
> +1
>> I would also like to see a set order to the file (preferably based on
>> a default flow for example: raw, -ave, -cov, trans, fwd, inv).
> good point. +1
>> I would love to see the -eve file information included in the
>> information with the raw information (in the same section). (even in
>> cases where there is no -eve file (as find events can get this)).
> I like this too.
>> I'd also like to see some of the names changed to make a better
>> association with the actual filenames/filenaming conventions (this may
>> prove to be controversial). For example Evoked -> Average (these are
>> -ave.fif). Instead of MRI at the top right (maybe BEM).
> I suggested Evoked and MRI :) reason is that MRI can be displayed
> without BEM and Evoked can contain other things than average (std dev
> for example).
>> But I would be happy to use this as is. It looks very good!
> +1
> again really nice job Mainak.
> thanks heaps Dan for the valuable feedback.
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
> dispose of the e-mail.

More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list