[Mne_analysis] jump artifacts after filtering

Denis-Alexander Engemann denis.engemann at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 09:34:54 EST 2015
Search archives:

General note,

if someone has the time and motivation to track down the subtle differences
in parametrisation of matlab VS scipy/mne filters I will pay that person a
huge beer next time we meet :)
There is definitely something to be understood and improved in that corner.

Cheers,
Denis


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Moorselaar, D. van <d.van.moorselaar at vu.nl>
wrote:

> Thank you for the quick response. I was running version 0.9. I have
> updated now to version 0.10 and the jump artifacts are indeed no longer
> present.
> There appears to be a offset shift though between matlab and mne filter
> (Matlab being consistently more negative), but I will look into this.
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best,
>
> Dirk
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Eric Larson <larson.eric.d at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Which version are you running? There was a bug some months ago that
> produced some jump artifacts, but it has been fixed in 0.10 (latest
> release) and master.
>
> Eric
> On Nov 11, 2015 6:01 AM, "Moorselaar, D. van" <d.van.moorselaar at vu.nl>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> At the moment I am working on a project in which I am comparing a
>> semi-automatic preprocessing procedure in Matlab (using EEGlab and
>> Fieldtrip toolboxes) to preprocessing in python using MNE (
>> github.com/dvanmoorselaar/eeg_analysis; still in development). I am able
>> to exactly replicate the results from the Matlab pipeline, potentially
>> allowing us to move all our eeg analyses to mne/python.
>> There is one problem however. While comparing the output in Matlab to
>> that in python per preprocessing step I noticed some weird jump artifacts
>> after applying a 0.5 high pass filter to the data:
>>
>> session.filter(l_freq = 0.5, h_freq = None, filter_length = 3073,
>> l_trans_bandwidth = 0.15)
>>
>> As visualized below (Matlab in red, Python in green), after referencing
>> the data are perfectly aligned (top figures). However, after applying a 0.5
>> high pass filter with the settings specified above (default Matlab
>> settings), the data now all of a sudden contain jump artifacts. These
>> artifacts are present at random intervals throughout the whole time series
>> and in all channels. At first I thought this might have something to do
>> with the chosen filter length (MNE give a warning that filter length should
>> be increased), however when I increased the filter length three times these
>> artifacts were still present (bottom right) in the data, although less
>> frequent and at different time points).
>>
>> <filter_artifact.png>
>> Also, I noticed that similar jump artifacts were present when applying a
>> 0.5 low pass filter instead of a high pass filter, potentially indicating
>> that something is off in the numpy fft convolution.  At first sight there
>> appeared nothing wrong with the power spectra of these filters.
>>
>> Is this a known problem or am I doing completely incorrect?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Dirk van Moorselaar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mne_analysis mailing list
>> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20151111/0048ad14/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list