[Mne_analysis] Discrepancy between mne_analyze and mne-python

Eric Larson larson.eric.d at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 11:54:12 EDT 2016
Search archives:

That's strange, they should match up. Can you share a snippet of code, the
-trans.fif, and the sparse head.fif file somewhere?


On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Sam Zorowitz <szorowi1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I was wondering if any might be able to suggest a reason why I'm seeing
> differences for the EEG co-registration of a subject between mne_analyze
> and mne-python. I've attached two images, one showing the co-registration
> from mne_analyze and one using mne.viz.plot_trans. Both images are from the
> same subject; the same digitization; and the same -trans.fif file.
> I ask because I am wondering if this is related to the very wonky
> topo-plot I am seeing for this subject, where the EEG sensors are located
> in bizarre locations on the scalp.
> Thanks!
> -Sam
> _______________________________________________
> Mne_analysis mailing list
> Mne_analysis at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/mne_analysis
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/mne_analysis/attachments/20160405/0b2c77c9/attachment.html 

More information about the Mne_analysis mailing list